OMG LOL John McCain Is Such An Asshole

Check out his new campaign advert:

[John McCain, wearing a Navy baseball cap and casual clothes, walks along the border fence with another white male, wearing a uniform, who is identified as Sheriff Paul Babeu of Pinal County, Arizona. They both look Very Serious.]

McCain: Drug and human smuggling, home invasions, murder.

Babeu: We're out-manned. Of all the illegals in America, more than half come through Arizona.

McCain: Have we got the right plan?

Babeu: Plan's perfect. [Text onscreen: McCain/Kyl Border Security Action Plan: National Guard Now. CompleteTheDangedFence.com] You bring troops, [Text onscreen: 3,000 New Border Control Agents] state, county, and local law enforcement together. [Text onscreen: Complete the Fence]

McCain: And complete the danged fence!

Babeu: It'll work this time. [Text onscreen: Paul Babeu is appearing only in his personal capacity. McCain squints into the sun, all tough-guy like.] Senator, you're one of us.

[Freeze-frame on John McCain's face. Text: Arizona's John McCain.]

McCain: I'm John McCain and I approve this message.
He approves this DANGED message!

Open Wide...

Happy Birthday, 'Liss!

As everyone knows, we here at Shakesville do every single thing that Melissa wants us to (/snark), so the theme of this year's cake was not a question.

However, we had more than one cook in the kitchen this year, so I'm posting both the cakes that were made.

First, this lovely offering from SKM and The Lady Eve:
and my own humble video offering to the QCoFM, on this, the anniversary of her nativity (for those without sound, the soundtrack is the Beatles "Birthday"):



Big huge titty-wrap hugs and happiest of Happy Birthdays to you, Melissa -- on a LOST day, no less!

Open Wide...

Open Thread

Photobucket

Hosted by Daffy.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Suggested by Shaker Quixotess: What's one movie that you wish you could get everyone to see?

Open Wide...

Betty White on SNL Open Thread

Saturday Night Live host Betty White surrounded by returning alums L-R Rachel Dratch, Amy Poehler, Tina Fey, Maya Rudolph, Anna Gasteyer, and Molly Shannon.

So. After Teh Internetz decided to "ironically" launch a grassroots campaign to champion the idea of recent Superbowl commercial sensation Betty White hosting SNL, seemingly ignorant of her legendary history as a hilarious lady that renders White's hosting less "ironic" than "way more sensible than the parade of talentless jackholes who usually host," the Golden Girl hosted this weekend alongside a bevy of other returning funny ladies, turning SNL into, for one glistening moment, a show in which women were centerpieces instead of stupid fucking props.

***Trigger Warning: Which still didn't preclude the inclusion of one of the WORST recurring sketches ever on SNL—which is really saying something—the Scared Straight sketch, which is just a series of horrible rape jokes. And it was included even though Debbie Downer, Bronx Beat, and Joyologist sketches hit the cutting room floor, so to speak—only viewable because rehearsal was taped; they didn't air.***

And, although Betty White was great, and the episode was funnier than usual, and even though I know that bawdy humor has always been a part of White's shtick (it's one of the reasons I love her!), I was disappointed at how many of the sketches ultimately came down to laughing at the ABSURD IDEA that an older woman could still be sexual. Which, ya know, isn't actually an absurd idea at all.

Discuss.

Open Wide...

Today's Edition of "Conniving and Sinister"



Blank

See Deeky's archive of all previous Conniving & Sinister strips here.

[In which Liss reimagines the long-running comic "Frank & Ernest," about two old straight white guys "telling it like it is," as a fat feminist white woman and a biracial queerbait telling it like it actually is from their perspectives. Hilarity ensues.]

Open Wide...

In Which I Substitute an Email Exchange With Melissa for an Actual Post

I was just scrubbing the kitchen at my folks' house, where I will be until after my mother's latest hip replacement. Out of the corner of my eye I caught an ad for the new film Letters to Juliet, which led to the following email exchange:

From: [SKM]
Subject: Did I mishear...
Date: May 10, 2010 1:57:47 PM CDT
To: [Melissa]


...or did the ad for Letters to Juliet that just ran on The Food Network feature a blond white dude saying to his blond, white girlfriend, "If I met my Juliet, I'd just grab her from that balcony and be done with it!"?

Really?

I must have misheard.

I fear I did not.

But then, I am scrubbing the kitchen...
From: [Melissa]
Subject: RE: Did I mishear...
Date: May 10, 2010 2:03:48 PM CDT
To: [SKM]


Oh dear. Oh dear oh dear oh dear.

I watched Romancing the Stone this weekend -- y'know, because it was on, so I HAD to watch it! -- and I was despairing to Iain how that movie would never get made today, because Joan Wilder ultimately saves herself and her sister, while Jack T. Colton is off wrestling with an alligator (or crocodile, or wev).

I'm sad for girls growing up today.

From: [SKM]
Subject: Re: Did I mishear...
Date: May 10, 2010 2:23:45 PM CDT
To: [Melissa]


Yes! I watch Romancing The Stone whenever it's on, too. Can't. Stop. Watching!

Other movies that would never get made today: Jumpin' Jack Flash and Warlock.

From: [Melissa]
Subject: RE: Did I mishear...
Date: May 10, 2010 2:25:20 PM CDT
To: [SKM]


Dragonslayer.

Tootsie.

Yentl.

From: [SKM]
Subject: Re: Did I mishear...
Date: May 10, 2010 2:31:05 PM CDT
To: [Melissa]

Have we had a thread on this? If not, sounds ripe for one of those "in which I substitute email with Liss for a post" numbers...

From: [Melissa]
Subject: RE: Did I mishear...
Date: May 10, 2010 2:41:25 PM CDT
To: [SKM]


If we have, it's been a looooooong while. Maybe a QotD once upon a time.

Go for it!

[H]ere are some more of my nominees, which you are welcome to use or not use as you see fit. :)

Labyrinth

Lady Jane

Splash (yes, Splash -- he goes to live in HER world!)

Btw, on the flipside of this, there are some movies being made now that WOULDN'T have been made when we were kids, like Whale Rider and Akeelah and the Bee and Quinceñera (all of which I love), so there's that.

Which brings up an interesting point about how marginalized girls are carrying the torch of feminism, while privileged girls are cast as the stars in the backlash. Interesting, that.
Yes. Interesting. Feel free to discuss.

Open Wide...

Quote of the Day

"In the underclass (black, white and Hispanic alike), intact families are now an endangered species."—Ideologically moribund dipshit Ross Douthat, using his New York Times column to wring his hands about how the times they are a-changing.

Note to Ross Douthat: These days, lots of families fail by design to fit your definition of "intact," i.e. "the ideal of the two-parent family," wherein those two parents are married and of the opposite sex. But that doesn't mean they're broken. Yeesh.

But I guess I oughtn't expect to be reasonable someone who spends a good portion of his column wrestling with the idea that it's somehow cheating, some sort of smug chicanery, that the East Coast liberals whose families look most like his ideal only achieve that model via their tricksy immoral reliance on abortion.

Yeah, well, Mr. Conservative Genius, call me when you're ready to try our idea: A robust network of social services to service all Americans equally, including those shattered riffraff in the underclass.

Open Wide...

Know Who I Like?

Cynthia Nixon. I totes had The Manhattan Project on tape when I was a kid, and I thought Jenny Anderman was the shit. I'm probably the only person whose first reaction upon seeing her as Miranda in Sex and the City was: "Hey, it's Jenny Anderman!"

Anyway. Here's an interview with Cynthia Nixon in The Advocate.

Open Wide...

Daily Dose o' Cute

This weekend, we discovered Dudley's favorite sleeping position:






And Matilda-Dudz relations finally began to thaw:


And we went to the dog park, where Dudz has evidently decided his role is maître d', as he politely trots to the front gate to greet every new dog and two-legs who comes to the park. He was also super frisky yesterday, and loved galloping in mad circles around the picnic table.


That's not him barking; we still haven't heard a peep out of him yet!

He also made friends with a little Jack Russell puppy who was like his own personal mini-me:


Watching them run around together was ridiculously cute. Iain and I decided at one point to go for a stroll around the park, leaving Dudz to play, but he came bounding after us and walked so nicely in between us all the way up the hill and around the park. He'd wander off to investigate periodically, and then come back to our sides, as if he'd always belonged there.

Open Wide...

Robots Have Let Me Down

[Trigger warning for strobe light effects in a graphic below the fold.]

Everyone one knows I love robots:



Get me an electric necktie, stat!

Last week I was thrilled to read that our anodized friends were teleporting in to the Los Golfo de México to save our proverbial bacon. Is there nothing robots can't do, I asked after reading the headline "Robots position giant box over oil-spewing well."

But it turns out robots aren't all they're cracked up to be.

Nope. The bots dropped the proverbial ball in the murky, leviathan depths. The malfunctioning oil well still spews sticky, black death and the robots have packed their bags gone home. (Where exactly do robots go home to, that's what I wanna know!) Environmental catastrophe: One. Robots: Zero.

Maybe that was a fluke, right? No. No, it isn't. Another new headline: "The day the machines took over Wall Street". WTF? Robots make shitty daytraders, I guess. Last Thursday's plunge (also into murky and leviathan depths) "is being blamed on computerized trading mechanisms." Stockmarket: Zero. Robots: Zero. Deeky's portfolio: -5351.

Thanks, robots! What's next?



Oh, yeah, that.

Open Wide...

OFFS

The rightwing homobigot brigade is already going totes apeshit about the possibility? rumors? fact?—I don't claim to know, and frankly it's none of my business—that SCOTUS nominee Elena Kagan is a lesbian.

Kyle over at Right Wing Watch is doing an awesome job keeping up with all the nonsense:

* The American Family Association: "No Lesbian is Qualified to Sit on the Supreme Court"

* Americans for Truth: LaBarbera Demands to Know if Kagan "Has a Personal Interest in Lesbianism"

* Focus on The Family Opposes Kagan Due To Her "Commitment to the LGBT Agenda"

Honestly, these people are almost incomprehensibly absurd.

Open Wide...

Shaker Help Request

Shaker koach emails:

I teach a graduate-level course focusing on censorship and freedom of speech. I endeavor to place several different viewpoints before my students and to challenge their thinking; many come to the class with an unexamined anti-censorship stance, which I would like to challenge with compelling arguments for some limitations on speech/expression. There are some classic examples of problematic speech, types of speech that people have, or want to, restrict:

* hate speech (particularly sexist and racist/ethnic slurs)
* corporate speech (rules about marketing, truthfulness, etc.)
* symbolic speech (such as burning the flag)
* anonymous speech

This is where I need help! As you may remember from various comment threads, I'm personally in favor of wide-open speech with practically no restrictions. But I know many Shakers are not. So, do you have any go-to sources for the "limit some speech for practical reasons" sort of argument? Any ideas would be most appreciated.

I know there are—there must be—good sources out there explaining why we should ban hate speech or regulate advertising or other such actions. That's what I'm looking for. Ideally, these sources would be academic, peer-reviewed, 5-35 pages (an article, a book chapter or two, etc.). I'd ideally like to include philosophical/ theoretical arguments, as well as some practical examples/ issues. Less academic sources, such as newspaper articles or blogs, would work in a pinch. I have looked through many databases offered by my university and haven't found much that's useful; I assume I'm not searching well.

Thanks in advance for any help!
Have at it, Shakers!

[Related Reading: On Hate Speech; On Hate Crimes.]

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime



Lena Horne: "Stormy Weather"

Open Wide...

Monday Blogaround

This blogaround brought to you by Shaxco, makers of Deeky's Underoos for Grown-Ass Men.

Recommended Reading:

Bri: Don't Be Love-Handling Me Thankyou Very Much

Mar: Damned Homeless People and Their Hunger

Chris: The Racial Politics of Regressive Storytelling

Michael: Kristin Chenoweth Lays Into Homophobic Article in Newsweek

Marti: Weekly Transadvocate Twitter Digest

Melissa: Cannes: 18 Male Directors and NO FEMALE DIRECTORS!

Leave your links in comments...

Open Wide...

Yay, Hugh Jackman! Yay, Lipton!

So, everyone already knows I love Hugh Jackman, right? (As do some other people around here.) Okay, well, if you didn't before, you do now!

So you can only imagine my love for this effervescent advert he did for Lipton Ice Tea:


[Jackman takes a sip of Lipton Ice Tea while sitting in a hotel lobby in Asia, then jumps up and dances his way through the hotel, shimmying with staff and guests along the way, a journey which culminates in an elaborate group dance number in the lobby back where he started. He comes out of one spin only for all the others to be gone, and we realize he's been in one spot, dancing alone, imagining the whole thing. He composes himself and sits back down, waving down a staff member for another tea. A voiceover says: "Enjoy the natural effect of tea. Lipton Ice Tea. Drink positive."]

The hat tip goes to Andy, who notes: "The folks over at Lipton chose Jackman to be their spokesperson because, according to them, 'he is a true entertainer who can dance, sing and act. We will use all of his skills.' I can't disagree one bit."

Nor can I.

With all the times I've got to write about some advert playing on stereotypes and prejudices and oppressive narratives, it quite genuinely feels awesome to be able to share an ad that made me grin from ear to ear.

Contact Lipton here to thank them.

Open Wide...

PSA Update

The Illinois Department of Public Health has abruptly yanked the PSA site connected to their "He's the 1" ad which caused quite a stir in Chicago last week.

The ads, of course, can still be seen in the papers and posted outside. It will be interesting to see if they run in the gay magazines again this week.

Also, the topic of HIV reinfection (or "superinfection") was discussed in last week's post quite a bit. There is a lot of good information on this very important topic at The Body.

Thanks for the teaspooning, Shakers!

(Tip 'o the Energy Dome to Lifelube. Caution: may be NSFW.)

Open Wide...

Dancing with the Victim-Blamers

by Shaker QLH

[Trigger warning for stalking, victim-blaming.]

In July of 2009, someone posted footage on-line of a naked woman videotaped through a hotel's peephole. The footage was of Erin Andrews, a sports reporter for ESPN, who swiftly acted to remove the video and press charges.

In her sole interview on the matter, Andrews "described the situation as a 'nightmare,' and stated that at the time she discovered the video she believed her career would end."

A suspect was arrested in October of 2009 and convicted in March of 2010. The very next month, "it was revealed that Andrews had been receiving email death threats since September 2009. The FBI was notified and security around her was tightened."

Stalked in 2009, with a conviction this March. Sent death threats since (not simply in, but since) September, to the point that the FBI became involved this April.

Erin Andrews' birthday is May 4th. I imagine that after the stalking conviction in March and having to deal with the FBI in April, she'd have liked May to go considerably better.

On Tuesday, May 4th, Elisabeth Hasselback used some time on "The View" to discuss Erin Andrews' ongoing appearances on "Dancing with the Stars."

"For the past three weeks, she's been wearing next to nothing," Hasselbeck said, mounting her soapbox. "I think in light of what happened and as illegal and as inexcusable as it was for that guy to peep on her in her hotel room, in some ways, if I'm that guy, I'm like, 'Man, I just could've waited 12 weeks and seen this—a little bit less—without the prison time.'"
The victim-blaming burns, and it displays a fundamental misunderstanding of what stalking and peeping are really about. The point isn't simply to see naked flesh; the Internet and local video store can supply plenty of that. The perpetrator wouldn't get the same rush from bumping into her in a bikini on a beach. The point is for it to be against her will, without her knowledge, something she doesn't know about and wouldn't consent to. Erin Andrews walks onto the dance floor in front of cameras, fully aware that she's being broadcast. In her hotel room, fixing her hair, alone behind a locked door, she thinks that she's alone. She thinks that she's safe. He knows that she's not.

The next day, Hasselback returned with an apology. Apparently she'd called Andrews for a private apology, at the suggestion of her five-year-old daughter, and here's what she told viewers:
"I went home and wasn't feeling that great about it, and I went home and I'm sitting with Grace, my 5-year-old, and she said, 'Mommy, why do you look so sad?' And I said, 'Well, Grace, today Mommy hurt someone's feelings," she said, tearing up.

"Yesterday when we were talking about Erin, even though I'm focused on the detestable human being who's behind bars thankfully, who's really made her life a living hell, I ended up hurting her…I told her and I promised her I would use my words more mindfully like I try to do to build people up and not break them down."
Hasselback's framing of having been "focused on the detestable human being" and having accidentally "ended up hurting" Andrews is a bizarre twist on reality, since she was clearly focused on Andrews' behavior and was plainly slut-shaming her for her appearance. This apology doesn't demonstrate that Hasselback genuinely understands where she went wrong. If she had a radical breakthrough about her deeply-entrenched victim-blaming attitude within twenty-four hours, the wording of her apology clearly doesn't reflect that.

What I also found interesting was the mix of reactions to what Hasselback said. People, reporters included, seem to have trouble supporting Andrews without taking specifically misogynist digs at Hasselback.

Many people from "Dancing with the Stars" tweeted their support for Andrews. But while Niecy Nash called Hasselback's comments, "Insensitive, in poor taste and remedial and foolish," Andrews' dance partner on the show (also her costume designer) called Hasselback jealous and stupid, playing on a popular misogynist theme that women only speak negatively about each other because they're jealous.

At the Miami Herald, in an article titled "Elisabeth Hasselbeck: stiletto in mouth" (because "foot in mouth" isn't nearly as evocative, right?), the reporter made sure to tell us that while Hasselback "yapped" about Andrews' outfit, she herself was "in a chest- and arm-baring sundress). Then, "Elisabeth tearfully apologized."

While E! directly called Hasselback's words "some creative victim-blaming," they also called Hasselback "teary" and said that she "not only turned on the waterworks, but somehow found a way to make it all about herself."

They also created a "Daily 10 Battle of the Blondes Poll," because the fact that both women are blonde is somehow hugely relevant to the story. The poll question: "Should Erin forgive Elisabeth for slamming her outfit?" Because, obviously, that's all it boils down to: one blonde chick said something nasty about another blonde chick's clothes, because women are catty like that, amirite? I'll bet her shoes were out of season, too!

By far, the best commentary I saw was from the L.A. Times, which, in comparison to everything else I read, sounded downright feminist.
The man, Michael Barrett, was sentenced to prison shortly before Andrews began her Dancing With The Stars competition and Andrews was emotional in speaking about the sentencing which she believed wasn't severe enough.

Hasselbeck's opinion here was that Barrett should have not bothered with hotel room peepholes and just waited to see DWTS. Hasselbeck also seemed to be suggesting that Andrews, because she was a victim of a man who committed a crime, should have altered her own behavior, maybe not dressed the same as all the other women competitors on the show.

Whether you believe Andrews is hurting her job credibility by appearing on the show (an argument that doesn't seem to be made for athletes like Chad Ochocinco and Evan Lysacek who are also still in the competition), it is patently unfair to think that Andrews needed to change her plans because she was the victim of a crime. It's a ballroom dance competition for goodness sakes. Gauze, sequins, short skirts, plunging necklines (boys and girls)? That's the deal. And the deal doesn't include an Erin Andrews exception because, well, you know, boys will be boys.
Note: If you click through to the linked articles, please do not read comments. I ran into the usual cesspool of misogyny and victim-blaming. The fact that it's a blonde-on-blonde catfight, starring a broad who's dared to enter the men's world of sports reporting, has excited a lot of fucknecks.

Open Wide...

RIP Lena Horne

Lena Horne, "who was the first black performer to be signed to a long-term contract by a major Hollywood studio and who went on to achieve international fame as a singer," has died at age 92.

Ms. Horne might have become a major movie star, but she was born 50 years too early, and languished at MGM in the 1940s because of the color of her skin... Ms. Horne was stuffed into one "all-star" musical after another — "Thousands Cheer" (1943), "Broadway Rhythm" (1944), "Two Girls and a Sailor" (1944), "Ziegfeld Follies" (1946), "Words and Music" (1948) — to sing a song or two that could easily be snipped from the movie when it played in the South, where the idea of an African-American performer in anything but a subservient role in a movie with an otherwise all-white cast was unthinkable.

"The only time I ever said a word to another actor who was white was Kathryn Grayson in a little segment of 'Show Boat'" included in "Till the Clouds Roll By" (1946), a movie about the life of Jerome Kern, Ms. Horne said in an interview in 1990.

...Looking back at the age of 80, Ms. Horne said: "My identity is very clear to me now. I am a black woman. I'm free. I no longer have to be a 'credit.' I don't have to be a symbol to anybody; I don't have to be a first to anybody. I don't have to be an imitation of a white woman that Hollywood sort of hoped I'd become. I'm me, and I'm like nobody else."
I know the exact moment I saw Lena Horne for the first time. I was 11, and she made a guest appearance on "The Cosby Show," as herself, in an episode where Claire (Phylicia Rashad) took Cliff (Bill Cosby) to see her perform for his birthday. I remember thinking how beautiful and glamorous she was, and falling utterly in love with her voice, which has remained to this day one of my absolute favorites—totally recognizable, totally unmistakable, totally butter.

RIP Ms. Horne.

[Note: If there are less flattering things to be said about Ms. Horne, they have been excluded because I am unaware of them, not as the result of any deliberate intent to whitewash her life. Please feel welcome to comment on the entirety of her work and life in this thread.]

Open Wide...

Elena Kagan Is Obama's SCOTUS Nominee

Elena Kagan, currently serving as Obama's Solicitor General, will reportedly be nominated today as retiring Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy John Paul Stevens' replacement.

In settling on Ms. Kagan, the president chose a well-regarded 50-year-old lawyer who served as a staff member in all three branches of government and was the first woman to be dean of Harvard Law School. If confirmed, she would be the youngest member and the third woman on the current court, but the first justice in nearly four decades without any prior judicial experience.
Because Kagan's got no bench experience, her nomination is being compared to Bush's nomination of Harriet Miers, which is not totally fair given Kagan's depth of experience and much more impressive résumé, but is not totally unfair, either, given Kagan's position in the administration.

To be totally honest, I'm personally more concerned about Kagan's lack of experience on the bench not because I feel it's universally inappropriate (or even necessarily a bad idea) to nominate someone with a more nontraditional background to SCOTUS, but because it doesn't provide an easy way to assess her judicial philosophy.

Paul Campos notes that Kagan is a blank slate, and LeMew notes: "When you're reduced to noting that a prospective nominee for the highest court in the land is a 'brilliant conversationalist' and that other Harvardites think she's good people, one has pretty much conceded that the pick is Ivy League nepotism of the worst sort."

Indeed so. Which leaves everyone guessing.

There are clues, hints, suggestions, whiffs that she might be a good progressive:
Kagan's professional biography reveals that she has spent the last several decades working closely with some of the country's best known left and center-left figures. ... [She] clerked for Thurgood Marshall, another liberal icon, whom Kagan has called her legal hero and the greatest lawyer of the 20th Century.

...Kagan's (admittedly scant) writings on the subject suggest that she might instead embrace Marshall's view that the Constitution should be interpreted expansively to provide rigorous protections for the dispossessed. In eulogizing her former boss in a 1993 law review article, Kagan observed that Marshall's pragmatic jurisprudential approach considered not just the law as written, but "the way in which law acted on people's lives." As Kagan noted, this approach demanded "special solicitude for the despised and disadvantaged." Kagan lauded this view of the judicial role, saying that "however much some recent justices have sniped" at Marshall's vision, it remained "a thing of glory." In the article's closing, Kagan nodded to the progressive view that the Constitution grows and adapts to meet the needs of a changing society, giving Marshall "credit" for our "modern Constitution."

Even if Kagan's judicial beliefs don't align with Marshall's in all particulars, her willingness to praise his general judicial principles suggests that she, like Marshall, sees the Constitution as a dynamic bulwark against majoritarian tyranny and political persecution.
Which sounds pretty good. But.

If you're a progressive, she's made troubling comments about executive power, has troubling ties to Goldman Sachs, and has a more-than-troubling record of diversity in hiring while dean of Harvard Law.

So. She's without a comprehensive record of flatly-stated positions on key issues, and she's rumored to be a good progressive, but there are indications she might really be a centrist. Sounds like someone else I know.

This nomination is, in my assessment, classic Obama.

I give a big "wev" to what I imagine her judicial stylings will be on the bench, and a thumbs-up to seeing another woman making her way to the Court.

Open Wide...