Bravo, CNN: Still Bringing Us the Finest Nooz

Actual Headline: Suspect in Pelosi threats case weeps at court hearing.

Actual Opening Paragraphs:

A man accused of threatening House Speaker Nancy Pelosi wept Thursday as he talked to his attorney before a federal court hearing.

Gregory L. Giusti, 48, was arrested Wednesday in San Francisco, California, where Pelosi's home district is located, according to FBI spokesman Joseph Schadler.

No further details were immediately available about the case.
No further details?!—What a copout! Was he sniffling? Was his nose running? Did he use a tissue, or did someone offer him a handkerchief? I NEED FURTHER DETAILS ABOUT THE WEEPING, CNN!

In all seriousness, I point out that this terrorist's weeping has been turned into an important news item for a reason: It further serves the narrative that each of these Totally-Not-Terrorists of the American Rightwing are independent actors, whose motivations formed in solitude, their actions exclusively attributable to lunacy. Men who cry, of course, are axiomatically unstable, each tear a wet little drip of evidence of the mental illness that is the exclusive source of their behavior.

It's a cunning little potion of sexism and disablism, delivered stealthily in an unmarked package, designed to assure you don't worry; it's only a few bad apples; pay no attention to the swelling indication that there's a dark ideology on the rise, fueling hatred and justifying extremism and tacitly encouraging violence…

Just look at this hapless, crazy loser. He's crying.

The media believes its purpose (and the government agrees) is to quell the hysterics and alarmists who shout that such men are not created in a void, by representing those men as silly characters. Pitiable, even.

Which make them sympathetic to other men like them.

The media creates rightwing martyrs, in its effort to discredit the left. And the beat goes on…

Open Wide...

Today's Edition of "Conniving and Sinister"

[Background here; also see here.]



Blank

See Deeky's archive of all previous Conniving & Sinister strips here.

[In which Liss reimagines the long-running comic "Frank & Ernest," about two old straight white guys "telling it like it is," as a fat feminist white woman and a biracial queerbait telling it like it actually is from their perspectives. Hilarity ensues.]

Open Wide...

Seen


For those who can't see the image, it's a car window written with that paint that is usually reserved for JV Volleyball teams and Just Married announcements.

It reads "I Heart Vag".

Go team!

[Cross-posted.]

Open Wide...

Patrick McCollum & the "Five Faiths" Rule

by Shaker Michelle, a 21-year-old feminist/heathen/writer/recent transplant to Austin.

Via Jason at The Wild Hunt, I learned about Wiccan chaplain Patrick McCollum, who is currently engaged in a battle to overturn California's exclusionary chaplains hiring practice:

A case coming before the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals could end up having major legal ramifications for all religious minorities in the United States. Wiccan chaplain Patrick McCollum has been fighting for years to overturn the State of California's "five faiths policy", which limits the hiring of paid chaplains to Protestant, Catholic, Jewish, Muslim, and Native American adherents. While McCollum has suffered setbacks in his quest, with a California federal district court ruling in early 2009 that he had no standing to bring his suit, he recently gained support on appeal from several civil and religious rights groups who argue that his case should be heard.

...While decisions made so far have focused only on whether McCollum has standing as a taxpayer or non-inmate to bring his suit, a new Amicus Curiae filed by the National Legal Foundation, on behalf of a conservative activist organization called WallBuilders, argues that McCollum has no standing because modern Pagans aren't guaranteed the same Constitutional rights and protections as Christian or monotheist citizens.
It's important to note that, even before the amicus was filed, the CDCR was making the same argument:
[T]he State's attorney general's office, has made the argument that religion in California is two-tiered, and that the five state faiths (the first tiered faiths) are afforded all of the equal rights and protections granted under the Constitution, but that all other faiths including Pagans, are second tier ... and are only afforded lesser rights, similar to one another. It is this concept that Pagans and other minority faiths are somehow less endowed, that I am fighting to overcome.
In the same interview, Mr. McCollum talks about some of the abuse he's gone through as a Wiccan chaplain, in government institutions and at the hands of government officers. Descriptions of some of the events may be triggering.

When I first encountered this story, my first thought was to spread the word a bit. I proceeded to post about the story on a forum I frequent, and the arguments I encountered are enclosed below, for your entertainment and head-desking.

The first responder proceeded to mansplain to me about how hysterical I was, along with telling me that he doesn't care if prisoners are discriminated against, and arguing that this is not a case of religious discrimination, despite all evidence to the contrary. Even aside from the treatment of the prisoners, the current ruling limits the hiring of paid chaplains to the "five faiths," so a chaplain outside of the five faiths cannot be hired, no matter how qualified they are.

Another poster said she thought this ruling sounded wrong, but she didn't know what paganism was, at all. I explained that paganism is extremely hard to define, as it's an umbrella term, but generally consists of religions that are not Christianity, Judaism, or Islam, that do have a reverence for the natural world, and that self-identify as being pagan; that pagans can be duotheists, monotheists, hard or soft polytheists, pantheists, animists, or people who regard the gods as metaphors for natural forces and changing seasons. Very broad term, is my point.

She responds with (paraphrased, but only slightly) "Oh. Well, now that I know that, why can't the Native American chaplain just do pagans too? They all sound the same."

You can't make this shit up. It's okay to have a different chaplain for Protestants and Catholics, but all those other weird religions? They're all the same!

Obviously, that's incredibly insulting to everyone involved. Even aside from the (I would hope) obvious issues with that statement, there's the existent tension between some practitioners of Native American religions and members of some pagan circles in which there has been rampant appropriation of Native culture.

And then there was my favorite, who started off with the argument that that theoretically Christian chaplains should be able to counsel pagans correctly (really? we all know how well THAT would work out in the majority of cases). There was also the "we should all just be able to get along and hold hands and sing kumbaya because aren't all of our religions really the same" refrain. Um, no, and also, way to miss the point.

When I mentioned the abuse Mr. McCollum suffered, along with the vandalizing of the Air Force Academy's worship center for Earth-based religions, she reponded by playing the "whoever treated him like that obviously weren't real Christians" card, followed by the "I have New Age, Wiccan, and Egyptologist friends!" card.

Yes, folks: Egyptologists. Obviously, here we have an expert. Also, this is after making it abundantly clear that pagan =/= Wiccan and that many pagans find that attitude that we're all the same frustrating. I need to make a bingo card, I think.

We are, thankfully, making progress in America with the acceptance of pagans. There's the aforementioned Air Force Academy worship center, as well as the New Jersey holiday ruling - but obviously & unfortunately, we have a long way to go.

Open Wide...

I Write Letters

Dear Jeffrey Zaslow,

If you're going to write a retrofuck gender essentialist article about the unique golden specialness of male friendships, at least have the decency to admit you're not talking about "men," but about a specific cross-section of straight men.

Because, frankly, in the year 2010, this kind of bullshit is just unconscionable:

[I]t's a mistake to judge men's interactions by assuming we need to be like women. Research shows that men often open up about emotional issues to wives, mothers, sisters and platonic female friends. That's partly because they assume male friends will be of little help. It may also be due to fears of seeming effeminate or gay.
See what you did there? Gay men are thus defined as not actually being Men at all, but some other category altogether that Men fear being thought a part of.

Wow. I hope you are just a lazy writer and not a terrible person!

Love,
Liss

P.S. It's weird how your entire premise falls apart if you include the experiences, typically including strong friendships with women, of gay men, huh? I'm sure that's just a coincidence!

Cc. Anna N.

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime



Oasis: "Whatever"

Open Wide...

At Last

Know what's better than a three-ring circus...? A three-ring circus with TWO ringleaders! Especially two incendiary, mendacious, opportunistic, authoritarian, kyriarchy-enforcing lady ringleaders who are also TOTES HOT!

Two of the country's most popular Republicans, Rep. Michele Bachmann (Minn.) and former Alaska governor Sarah Palin, teamed up Wednesday for a rollicking campaign rally that targeted President Obama as weak on national security and doomed to a single term.

...Several thousand people showed up to see Bachmann and Palin, both famous for their fiery populism and ability to rile opponents. Darlings of "tea party" conservatives, the women were appearing together for the first time, and they welcomed the crowd's embrace. Palin headlined a fundraiser for Bachmann later in the day.

The rally was a lively assault on Democrats in Congress and the White House. The emcee, talk radio host Chris Baker, drew cheers and laughter when he said the party in power in Washington is a "lying, thieving ... bunch of commies."

...[Bachmann] reminded another audience recently of her 2008 comment that Obama might have "anti-American views," declaring, "I said I had very serious concerns that Barack Obama had anti-American views, and now I look like Nostradamus."

...Many in the audience wore buttons with side-by-side images of Palin and Bachmann. One man's a sweatshirt had an image of Mount Rushmore and the words "Right Wing Extremist: Guess I'm in Good Company."

Betty Soban, an admiring constituent of Bachmann's, said: "My family left Germany because of Hitler and socialized medicine. I see it happening here." Important to her, she said, are "freedom of ownership. Freedom of our guns. Freedom of having babies."
By which, of course, she means the freedom to force other women to have babies.

That sounds like a real fun event. It's too bad I couldn't be there, but I was busy advocating for the equality of all women, from which Palin and Bachmann benefit even as they trade on being rightwing tokens who demean the very activism that has afforded them the public platform on which they bask in the luxury of their disdain.

Open Wide...

Paws Here, Edinburgh

Just a quick note to introduce the topic from me, and then I'll get straight to the message. A young woman who runs an adoption centre/ animal shelter in Edinburgh, Scotland with her partner (and some other very dedicated volunteers), has decided to take up her teaspoon and begin advocating for change in a public way, and thinking she's got a great thing going and wanting to support it, I bethought me to bring over a letter she's written to a local politician beginning a campaign to close down the rodent and rabbit "mills" in Britain, as the puppy mills were closed a few years ago.

Among her good works is a dedication to providing a home for animals whose adopters can't care for them for various reasons, specifically including regular contact with the social work agencies in her region, giving shelter to animals whose adopters must go into care or hospital.

If you have the wherewithal to help her out in any way, I'd call it a mighty teaspoon wielded for those who don't have the voice/power/knowledge to argue for themselves - which is pretty much a good chunk of what we do here, y'know?

A warning for the sensitive of stomach: Rachel pulls no punches in her letter, including somewhat graphic (but appropriate, I think) descriptions of some of the sadder cases she has to deal with.

Dear Fred Mackintosh,

My name is Rachel, I run an independent animal shelter in Morningside which focuses particularly on rabbits and rodents, and today, as with most days, I'm worried.

As usual we are at full capacity. 20 rabbits here, more in foster homes, 10 on a waiting list to come in. All the shelters, SSPCA and independent, are full of rabbits. We've had word that a rabbit rescue in East Lothian has had to close down under the pressure. It's something we can well understand.

Yesterday two more rabbits were brought in by a young family to be rehomed. The father fills out our Rabbit Welfare Association survey, and puts three hesitant, almost embarrassed ticks in the boxes marked “bought from a pet shop”, “bought for a child” and “child lost interest”. The ticks are the last in a long line of other ticks from other families who have decided that the same boxes apply to them. We hear this so often that it is becoming some kind of horrific joke around here. This is happening daily. Rabbits live for 10-12 years. People buy them for kids and give them up within a year. It is not difficult to see that there is a major problem here. The rabbits will have to be spayed before we can rehome them. We're lucky, very lucky. A good small animal vet (a rare thing) has agreed to give us much reduced charity prices for having these animals spayed, neutered, vaccinated and treated there. So the operation for these rabbits will cost us £130. Vaccinations will be more. We rehome a rabbit for a £30 donation. You can already see the problem. In animal welfare we have a saying, “it is impossible to breed, keep and sell animals ethically and make a profit.” Pet shops and breeding mills are making a profit from breeding and selling animals. What does that imply?

We take down the rabbits' details and reassure the family that we only rehome to the best possible homes, that we do home checks, have application forms for adoption, never split up bonded pairs, and regularly turn down people who we do not believe will be suitable pet owners. We tell them to contact us any time to find out how the bunnies are doing. We know from experience that we will probably never hear from them again.

Rabbits are bigger than you might think from looking at the tiny baby bunnies in pet shops where they are often weak, too young to be weaned, wrongly gendered, ill, poorly bred and sold to anyone. Today I have to take one of our bigger rabbits to the vet for ongoing treatment for his bed sores. I want you to stop for a moment and think about how an otherwise healthy animal comes in to an animal shelter with gaping, infected sores on his feet and underbelly. It is from being kept in a hutch too small for him to even move, on dirty, urine-soaked bedding, for his entire life. The vet students from the local veterinary school come here for a week at a time to learn about small animal husbandry, and we have one here this week as well as a disadvantaged teenager who is getting work experience through a government scheme to help her and other young people like her to find work, and one of our regular volunteers. I don't know how I'd get through today without them.

Part way through the day another rabbit is brought in. Pretty soon we realise that something is badly wrong – that this is one of those cases where owners bring in a pet because the animal is ill and they do not want to pay for veterinary care. They are too ashamed to tell us this most of the time, and often it is too late for us or our vets to do anything but make them comfortable. We do what we can. We try to give their last few hours the peace, dignity and freedom from pain that were missing from their lives. This rabbit doesn't look as bad as some, though, and could be in with a chance. Another trip to the vet. There will be permanent partial paralysis of the hind quarters and bunny will have to be medicated for life, making it a near certainty that he will never be adopted. A full diagnosis will be made in a week's time, when the pain killers have had some effect and he has settled down in this new environment. X-rays will be needed. We will need to raise hundreds of pounds in a week, on top of our normal bills and costs. I let our volunteers know that this is the situation – it is not a new one.

The end of the day comes and I am still worried. Today we rehomed one hamster. It is not enough. We are running low on hay, relying on donated bags. What will happen if we run out? We try to raise money to fund the work we do by selling pet products – dog food, hamster cages, cat litter and so on. But our shelves are nearly bare because we simply do not have the funds to pay for an order of products. A bill from the waste disposal people. A bill for the license. Hundreds of pounds that we don't have, that even if we did have should be spent on x-rays for that bunny today that drags his hind legs across his cage to the food dish in excruciating pain. I give him his pain medication. I take a last-minute phone call, and add more rabbits to the waiting list for spaces here.

And, despairing, I am thinking one thing. Why are breeding mills and pet shops still producing and selling these animals like so many toys? Puppy mills are, thankfully, a thing of the past. Yet rabbits are the most neglected pet in Britain, according to the SSPCA and the Rabbit Welfare Association, and are still being mass produced in rabbit and rodent mills like the Essex Breeding Centre, and sold to absolutely anyone by pet shops and superstores. We have had pets brought in by social workers that were sold to people with extreme learning difficulties who cannot even look after themselves. Guinea pigs that are kept in hamster cages. Rabbits belonging to children who neglected to feed them until they were starved to the point of death. Rats tortured by having their toes cut off repeatedly. Pets suffering such extreme psychological trauma from their abuse and neglect that they never recovered. These are not isolated incidents! This is happening every single day. This is the reality of my working life. Rabbits are the third most popular pet in Britain, yet shelters are so full of them that some are having to close down under the pressure. The current system is not working, and trying to police the pet owners is nearly impossible. The problem needs to be fixed at the source.

I don't know how you can help. I just know that you CAN help. You've not gotten to where you are without being a resourceful person – a person who can make things happen. Please do what you can to get this issue heard and dealt with. I know what it's like to feel like the problem is insurmountable – it's something I have to deal with every day, that hollow feeling that it is too much, that we will never make a difference. But politicians and animal welfare workers have this in common: we have the attitude that no matter what the odds, no matter how tiring or thankless the effort, we have to try to make a difference because if we don't, who will?

There's a time when we have to stand up against obvious injustice and give our voices to those who have none. That time is now.

Thank you for your time,

Rachel Plummer.

-=-=-

The shelter's website is here, and they have a community on LJ at paws_here. They can be reached by e-mail at pets@pawshereedinburgh.co.uk.

Open Wide...

Fun with Contemptible Dichotomies

So. Lauren Slater has written an article for Self magazine so awesome that both MSNBC and AOL reprinted it. The article asks the very important question: "Would You Rather be Fat and Happy or Thin and Sad?"

From the perspective of a happy (and happy-go-lucky) fat woman, that question is so absurd I can hardly believe anyone asks it. That people do, with seriousness, reminds me once again why being publicly, shamelessly, unshakably fat and happy is an act of both will and bravery.

The associated poll at AOL is yet further reminder:


People would rather be thin and miserable than look like me and be happy. Well. I would take that more personally if I didn't understand that it's because so many people can't imagine the possibility of looking like me and being happy, because they know the power of their own hostile prejudice, at the blunt end of which they wouldn't want to try to live a happy life.

[H/Ts to Shakers Molliecat and SamanthaExplosion.]

Open Wide...

Open Thread

Photobucket

Hosted by Green River soda. (And two glasses of water.)

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Suggested by Shaker Ledasmom: What author do you wish could go on writing forever, assuming they kept writing quality books?

Open Wide...

Quote of the Day

"When we get fat, we fool ourselves with every kind of lie imaginable. By 2008, my weight started creeping up and I said, 'Oh, I still look good at 150. I still look good at 155. I still look okay at 165. Some of my clothes still fit at 175.' And nobody was saying 'You're fat.' I was like a bank robber who was getting away with it."Kirstie Alley, equating being fat with being a criminal, and just generally, as per usual, really not helping.

Open Wide...

Daily Kitteh



Lady Sleepington of Couchworth

Open Wide...

A Grumbles Extolment!

The finest book for young-men and boys alike since Struwwelpeter is at long last alighting upon Book-store shelves, after too long in dormancy! Yes, I am speaking of Exercises for Gentlemen: 50 Exercises to Do With Your Suit On (Orig. Pub. Date 1908) by my good friend, the sterling and upright Alfred B. Olsen (MD). As you are doubtless aware, Alfie is superintendent of the Surrey Hills Hydropathic Sanitarium, the superior establishment for procuring a milk-and-egg colonic purge or, as my ship's yeoman Bruce is keen on, a relaxing afternoon in the baths, in the company of other physique-minded chums.

As Alfie's masculine words remind us, "as a general rule, flabby muscles may be taken to denote a general mental, if not moral, flabbiness." All the wondrous exercises in these pages can be performed in the comfort of one's parlor, or even the cramped confines of one's Airship. All without the need to disrobe! That last tiddly-bit has not penetrated the wavy tufts haloing Bruce's skull, as I repeatedly find him lounging about the dormitory sans undergarments.

As one-time Head Detector of Potions, Elixirs, and Poisons for the US Government and Its Occupied Territories it is with great assurance you can accept my mustache-bristling endorsement of Alfred B. "Alfie" Olsen (MD)'s book. Send the houseboy out for your copy today!

[Previous Grumblings: Benjamin H. Grumbles, Progress: Dagnabbit!, A Day in the Life of Benjamin H. Grumbles, What in the Sam Hill Are You Rascals Thinking?, Friday Cat Blogging, Damnable Milkshakery, Grumbles' Gashouse, Dash It All, McCain Is Off His Trolley, I Say, Somebody Bet on the Bob-Tailed Nag, Grumbles Writes Letters, Hosiery Is No Laughing Matter, Fear Not, Shakesvillians!, Bunsen's Balderdash!, Taint a Good Man, A Hearty Yawp of Well Wishes, The Grandest Male Organ, Bully for Science!]

Open Wide...

Today in Still Not Terrorism

[Trigger warning.]

FBI arrests man for threatening Pelosi: "Several federal officials said the man made dozens of calls to Pelosi's homes in California and Washington, as well as to her husband's business office. They said he recited her home address and said if she wanted to see it again, she would not support the health care overhaul bill that since has been enacted."

Open Wide...

Paging the Clean-Up Crew


[Image is the cover of this week's issue of Newsweek, with a picture of the Virgin Mary accompanied by the text: "What Would Mary Do? How Women Can Save the Catholic Church From Its Sins. By Lisa Miller."]

Shaker MJ emails that the question which emerges from "the depths of my escaped-Catholic brain [is]: Women haven't been good enough to be considered anything but second class in the Catholic world since Mary gave birth—and now we should fix your mess?!"

Totes.

The cover story itself, in fairness, is not so much about "how women can save the Catholic Church" as much as it is about how shaking up the insular, hermetically-sealed, all-male leadership can allegedly save the Catholic Church.

Also in fairness, the article is shit, riddled with tiresome stereotypes, strawmen, and the laughably trite invocation of Lynndie England as a Requisite Sober Reminder that "women in power can be as ruthless and self-serving as men." Margaret Thatcher is positively livid that she's gone out of fashion as Exhibit A in any respectable Requisite Sober Reminder, and the female equivalent of Pol Pot paces anxiously as she waits to be born into her long-overdue existence.

I'm no apologist for England or her condemnable actions, but in an article detailing the inherent corruption in insular, hermetically-sealed, male-dominated institutions, picking as evidence that women are Just As Bad a woman on the ass-bottom rung of an insular, hermetically-sealed, male-dominated institution who served as a scapegoat for her male leadership is just bad goddamn writing, apart from anything else.

As is this: "The problem is not, as so many progressives claim, the fact of their celibacy. Nor is it their costumes—the miters and capes—though these vanities do serve as reminders of the great distance between the men with power and the people without." Uh-huh. When was the last time you heard a progressive (or anyone) claim the genesis of institutional sex abuse was the robes? I'm gonna go with...never.

It's too bad, really, because the thesis of the story isn't wrong—institutions in which power is exclusively concentrated in the hands of a highly privileged class are generally rife with corruption and abuse. That is one of the primary arguments in support of diversity and multiculturalism.

But the execution was not awesome. And the cover is in a class of FAIL all its own.

Open Wide...

I Get Letters

... From Jesus!

From: Jesus
To: deeky@gashlycrumbenterprises.com
Subject: Discover the love of God; Jesus Christ wants to give you salvation and eternal life
Date: Apr 7, 2010 12:15 AM


DID YOU KNOW THAT JESUS LOVES YOU AND DIED ON THE CROSS FOR YOUR SINS?

He has already paid the price for you.
You just need to receive Him into your heart and confess that Jesus Christ is the Lord of your life and your Savior.

Invite Him today to enter your heart. ¡Dare! And now follow this prayer:

Lord Jesus:
- I confess I am a sinner and I invite you into my heart.
- Forgive my sins.
- I give in to you.
- Thank you for this eternal life that you're giving me right now.
- I now confess you as my Lord and Savior.
- Fill me with your Holy Spirit.
- Make your will in my life; help me to find you and obey you.

Read the Bible and find a Christian church to be taught the Word of God.

Go to: http://www.realjesusywebsite.com/

God bless you.
God bless me indeed!

[X-posted.]

Open Wide...

Today's Edition of "Conniving and Sinister"

[Background here and here.]



Blank

See Deeky's archive of all previous Conniving & Sinister strips here.

[In which Liss reimagines the long-running comic "Frank & Ernest," about two old straight white guys "telling it like it is," as a fat feminist white woman and a biracial queerbait telling it like it actually is from their perspectives. Hilarity ensues.]

Open Wide...

This is a real thing in the world.

Via email...

Liss: This is a real thing in the world.

Deeky: Please tell me that was published April first.

Liss: NOPE! And I am already planning a JAZZLING SESSION where I shave my ladybits and you shave your head and then we get MATCHING JAZZLE!!! It'll be like a girls' spa day, but SPARKLIER!!!

Deeky: LOL! I can't shave my head. It's too lumpy and misshapen.

Liss: I hear that lumpy and misshapen heads make PERFECT HEADDAZZLING CANVASSES so you, my friend, are in LUCK. Sweet, sweet luck.

Deeky: LOLOLOL!!!

Open Wide...

On Collective (and Selective) Memory

You know, I am not at all surprised by the fact that Virginia's Governor Robert McDonnell proclaimed April Confederate History Month. My (Louisiana) parish has done it before and I'm sure it's not an anomaly in the South.

But what gets me, what always gets me, when I see people loving on the Confederacy and declaring that their flags and memorials are all about heritage, is the selective, largely one-sided memory they have. The "Old South" may have been all moonlight and magnolias in their recollections, but there were four million or so people who, I'll bet, remembered it quite differently.

Encouraging people to remember the Confederacy includes encouraging them to remember that those states left the Union largely because of their fear that Abraham Lincoln would not just stop the expansion of slavery, but abolish it all together. Remember that these people were willing to go to war to protect their right to own and exploit other people. That dims the moonlight a little bit.

The irony is, it is "heritage" to remember the Confederacy, but we are never supposed to talk about slavery. McDonnell urges people to "to recognize how our history has led to our present," but when we talk about how slavery has very real effects on our present, that is dismissed. It ended a century and a half ago, after all, and to talk about it is to search for grievances and dwell on the past or however that argument goes. The proclamation itself makes no mention of slavery, just vague allusions to "a time very different than ours today." McDonnell himself suggested that slavery was not important enough to merit mention in a proclamation about remembering the Confederacy.

That is not the only contradiction in that proclamation:

all Virginians can appreciate the fact that when ultimately overwhelmed by the insurmountable numbers and resources of the Union Army, the surviving, imprisoned and injured Confederate soldiers gave their word and allegiance to the United States of America, and returned to their homes and families to rebuild their communities in peace
No, they didn't. They fought like hell to reinstate and then maintain their previous control over every aspect of southern life, at the cost of thousands of lives and the continued denial of the most basic civic rights.

And then, the admonition that "this defining chapter in Virginia’s history should not be forgotten," as if that has ever been a possibility. (Some) white southerners and their sympathizers have been busy since the end of the Civil War making sure we never forget their noble "Lost Cause" or how near-perfect the South was before the intrusion and unwarranted intervention of the North. Confederate flags haven't just been on people's bumper stickers or their back windows. They've flown over state capitol buildings and been woven into new flags. We are not in danger of forgetting "this defining chapter."

I think what we are in danger of forgetting--and I say this as a history teacher in Texas absolutely appalled at what the Texas Board of Education is doing to the social studies curriculum--is that not everyone has had the same experiences of every event in U.S. history and that those "defining chapters" have tended to be interpreted very differently by people forced into the margins of society. That doesn't make those interpretations any less valid or real or "American."

It is enraging and hurtful to me that people expect us to learn, to teach, to glorify history in a way that disappears us, our experiences and our contributions. The history of this nation is not composed solely of the experiences and opinions of the dominant group(s).

Neither should its collective memory be.

ETA: I was in such a hurry, I neglected to give hat tips to Shaker Koach, Liss, and Spudsy, who all provided links.

Open Wide...