Let the Games Begin

Max Fisher, from the Atlantic Wire, has a great rundown of articles that talk about the imminent CPAC showdown between the Tea Party (I still can't believe I just typed "Tea Party") and the current GOP. Both factions are ready to put their Borg game on and completely assimilate the other into a huge collective of shit.

And all that doesn't even matter to me, because all I care about is Max Fisher.

So, here's a brief glimpse into Max's countless achievements prior to joining the Atlantic Wire:


(If you can't view the video, it's a montage from Rushmore, of the student activities of its main character, Max Fischer.)

[H/T to ThinkProgress]

Open Wide...

Half-Assed Diversity

Blacks, Latinos, and women of any color have lost ground at Silicon Valley tech companies:

Hispanics and blacks made up a smaller share of the valley's computer workers in 2008 than they did in 2000, a Mercury News review of federal data shows, even as their share grew across the nation. Women in computer-related occupations saw declines around the country, but they are an even smaller proportion of the work force here.

...An analysis by the Mercury News of the combined work force of 10 of the valley's largest companies — including Hewlett-Packard, Intel, Cisco Systems, eBay and AMD — shows that while the collective work force of those 10 companies grew by 16 percent between 1999 and 2005, an already small population of black workers dropped by 16 percent, while the number of Hispanic workers declined by 11 percent. By 2005, only about 2,200 of the 30,000 Silicon Valley-based workers at those 10 companies were black or Hispanic.

The share of women at those 10 companies declined to 33 percent in 2005, from 37 percent in 1999. There was also a decline in the share of management-level jobs held by women.

"It's just disappointing," said Shellye Archambeau, the African-American CEO of MetricStream, a Palo Alto-based company that provides governance, risk and compliance support to global corporations such as BP and Pfizer. "The valley is a very strong place, but the fact that we are so lacking in female leadership, in African-American leadership, and frankly in Latino leadership in tech, you just sit there and say, 'Imagine what it could be.'"

...In Silicon Valley companies, men and women in technical careers are equally likely to hold mid-level jobs, but men are 2.7 times more likely than women to be promoted to a high-ranking tech jobs such as vice president of engineering, or senior engineering manager, Simard and Henderson found in a 2009 study.

...Aristotle Saunders, a 32-year-old Marvell engineer, volunteers with school kids in Oakland, dissecting iPods to interest them in a tech career. He thinks the lack of visible middle-class minority neighborhoods in Silicon Valley makes it even tougher to recruit minorities to tech jobs here.

"I sort of have that chameleon feel where I can fit in anywhere, but I can see where people raised in a black neighborhood would feel really uncomfortable," said Saunders, whose parents are African-American and Filipino and who grew up in a predominantly white neighborhood in Southern California. "Even though Silicon Valley is based on a principle of meritocracy, where they value people based on their skills rather than their class or ethnic background, I think it's still a challenge."
One of the biggest flaws in a lot of the diversity programs championed in corporate America is that there is a disproportionate (and often exclusive) focus on diversity in hiring, the idea being that the biggest roadblock for marginalized people is just getting a foot in the door.

But corporate American culture still strongly privileges whiteness, maleness, straightness, cisness, able-bodiedness. When "diversity programs" don't include a concerted, comprehensive effort to undermine the kyriarchal culture of a firm, people hired in as part of a diversity program will continue to be marginalized.

While dudes bond over fantasy football leagues that are openly discussed in the workplace, their female colleagues are left on the margins. While dudes bond over drinks after work, their straight female colleagues are heading home to (still) do the lion's share of childcare (possibly while their male partners are getting a leg up at work by going out for a drink with their male coworkers). While dudes bond over the latest expensive tech gadgets, their female coworkers are stressing out about how to pay their bills, because they make as much as 30% less and have to spend a huge chunk of their paycheck on clothes, undergarments, shoes, make-up, and haircare to adhere to a beauty standard that doesn't apply to their male colleagues.

The communication habits of white men, treated by corporate America as the natural and best and only way to communicate, leaves people from backgrounds who didn't grow up speaking that language (literally and/or figuratively) feeling frustrated and excluded. White male colleagues who aren't aware that "the rules" of corporate America have been designed to suit them regard their not-whitemale colleagues as unqualified, as not understanding "how to play the game." Not-whitemales have a more difficult time getting their ideas heard, their concerns addressed. Not-whitemales who figure out how to speak the right language are promoted, thus reinforcing the cycle of non-diversity, even as diversity is hailed a hero.

These are the problems of half-assed diversity programs. And the result is that, 10 years after everyone was kissing Silicon Valley's ass for its embrace of diversity, the companies' inclusion is sliding backwards, especially at the top.

Diversity without multiculturalism is just hiring people who look different and expecting them to act the same. If these companies want to get serious about diversity, then they need to reflect that in their culture, not just their hiring records.

[H/T to Shaker Quercki.]

Open Wide...

Deeky's Office Tip #372

[In which I offer career advice for the young professional.]

If you randomly print out something every once in a while and have to walk across the room to the printer to pick it up, it gives the impression that you're busy working on an important project.

(Thanks for the graphic go to Liss, who apparently thinks I work in a prison.)

Open Wide...

Open Thread


Hosted by Zoƫ Washburne.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Suggested by Shaker Cay: What's the greatest risk you ever took? How did it turn out?


This guy.

And I am certainly the greatest risk he ever took, too. I gave up my job and my home to move to his country, and then he gave up his country to immigrate to mine. Being together on the same shore meant getting married; we did the deed in an Illinois courthouse after having spent mere weeks in each other's presence over the course of just more than a year. The wild thing is, it didn't even feel like the risk that it actually was.

It's turned out pretty damn well so far. I love him like whoa.

Open Wide...

Oh, Republicans. You Are So Very Silly.

South Carolina State Representative Mike Pitts (R-Idiculous) has introduced legislation "that would ban what he calls 'the unconstitutional substitution of Federal Reserve Notes for silver and gold coin' in South Carolina."

If the bill were to become law, South Carolina would no longer accept or use anything other than silver and gold coins as a form of payment for any debt, meaning paper money would be out in the Palmetto State.

Pitts said the intent of the bill is to give South Carolina the ability to 'function through gold and silver coinage' and give the state a 'base of currency' in the event of a complete implosion of the U.S. economic system.

...Critics point out that silver and gold coins can't actually serve as a form of currency.

"You can't put a set value on a pure silver or gold coin because its actual value fluctuates," one expert said. "You can say a gold coin is worth $50 but it would actually be worth whatever the market says it's worth, based on supply and demand. In reality, what you have is a bartering good, not a form of currency."
Details schmetails! What I want to know is the exchange rate on my buttload of Ronpaulbux!

Open Wide...

Daily Kitteh



Livs, with an irresistible face.

Open Wide...

Quote of the Day

"It says a lot about the Republican party that they would anoint as their 'rising star' someone who in 2010 is actually stripping away from Americans legal protections against discrimination.."Hari Sevugan, spokesperson for former Virginia Governor Tim Kaine (D), whose successor, Gov. Bob McDonnell (R) has signed an executive order rolling back employment protections for LGB state workers instituted under Kaine.

File Under: Rank (and File) Bigotry. Party of assholes.

[H/T to Shaker CJ_in_VA.]

Open Wide...

Today's Edition of "Conniving and Sinister"



Blank

Strips One, Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, Seven, Eight, Nine, Ten, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117. In which Liss reimagines the long-running comic "Frank & Ernest," about two old straight white guys "telling it like it is," as a fat feminist white woman and a biracial queerbait telling it like it actually is from their perspectives. Hilarity ensues.

Open Wide...

Texting! With Liss and Deeky!

Sometime after Lost last night.

Deeky: Did you see that commercial for the shitastic Jennifer Aniston movie?

Liss: Which one? The one where Gerard Buttfor is her ex-husband?

Deeky: Yes! And he's a bounty hunter and he gets to abduct her and throw her in the trunk of his car... Hardeeharhar.

Liss: It makes me barf every time I see the trailer.

Deeky: I love how "From the director of Hitch" is supposed to be some kind of selling point.

Liss: "From the director of poop and fartz."

Deeky: LOL!

Open Wide...

Important Announcement

This is the greatest outfit in the history of the Olympics:


[Click to embiggen.]

That is all.

Open Wide...

Submitted Without Comment

[Trigger warning.]

Conservative Political Action Conference to feature a Nancy Pelosi piƱata and a Harry Reid punching bag for guests to take turns beating.

(H/T to Shaker Thunderbird.)

Open Wide...

Unfriendly Skies

In the wake of Kevin Smith's too-fat-to-fly ousting by Southwest, Shaker Esme emails some more examples of fuckery from airlines:

TSA forces travelling policeman to remove his disabled four-year-old son's leg-braces.

and:

US Airways Philadelphia alert sparked by Jewish prayer.

One trend I've noticed in these types of stories is that it seems rare for security to deprive able-bodied white English-speaking Christian men of necessary items to fly. Instead, the people targeted are people of color (wooooo profiling), women (carrying such dangerous items as breast milk, or breasts), people who speak in a language other than English, people who pray in ways of non-Christian religions (Jews and Muslims), and people using items to accommodate a disability (wheelchairs, braces, medicine).

Of course, the terrorism that is most likely to kill people in America comes in the forms of hate crimes, and domestic acts of terror performed primarily by Christian white men.

Also, it's incredibly sad that THE SECOND COMMENTER on the BoingBoing piece uses the word "lame." Irony, thy name is Internet Dumbshit.
At some point, some genius like Richard Branson is going to realize so many people are finding other ways to travel to avoid these sorts of abuses by traditional carriers, that there's a fuckload of money to be made in an airline that services "nontraditional" flyers.

If I had a billion dollars laying around, Fly Freak Airlines, accommodating fat asses with big seats and treating every individual passenger like a human being, would be cruising on the nation's runways, like, yesterday.

Open Wide...

Wednesday Blogaround

This blogaround brought to you by Shaxco, proud distributors of SKM's Snazzy Science Trapper Keepers.

Recommended Reading:

Marcella: Carnival Against Sexual Violence 88

Andy: Expert: 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' Repeal in 'Grave Peril'; HRC, Obama Must Act

Resistance: Behind the Symbol

Jennifer: All You Need Is...

Digby: History for Dummies

Lindsay: When Someone Says No, You Have to Listen

Chris: I Get Email

Leave your links in comments...

Open Wide...

Tha teaghlach math a' fuireach anns an taigh sin.

I love not being a mother.

To say that is simply a statement of fact about myself. It does not contain an implicit condemnation of other women's choices.

I have friends and family members who love being mothers, with the usual caveats and qualifications and moments of exasperation and even regret. And, quite honestly, I'm fairly certain if, by some strange and unexpected twist of fate, I had become a mother, I'd love being a mother, too.

But that near-certainty still doesn't make me want to be one. Because, with absolute certainty, I love not being a mother.

The only thing I don't love about not being a mother is being constantly asked why I'm not one.

It's such an intimate question, casually asked by perfect strangers, frequently in circumstances I don't anticipate will turn into a referendum on my reproductive choices. People trying to sell us something—furniture, a car, cabinetry, a major appliance—are the most egregious and shameless offenders, marching straight toward impropriety without hesitation and dragging my womb out onto the showroom floor for everyone to examine.

Intrusive questions about whether my parts work are deeply unpleasant, but the worst inquiry I get is: When are you two going to start a family?

I hate everything about that question, from its wanton familiarity to its profoundly contemptible implication that Iain and I aren't already a family.

We started a family the moment we decided to spend our lives together. We committed ourselves, long before we were married, to build a life with one another, and our shared life looks like that of any other family—we love, we fight, we make dinner, we go on holiday, we rake leaves, we pick out a paint color for the bathroom. But for the intentional absence of children, the snapshots of our life are totally unremarkable.

We are a family.

To ask when we will start a family is to miss the point entirely. It's not that our family hasn't been started; it's that our family is already complete.

Open Wide...

NYPD Stop-and-Frisked More than Half Million New Yorkers Last Year

[Trigger warning.]

I am absolutely gobsmacked by the press release I just received from the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) about "the fourth quarter data for 2009 on stop-and-frisks just released by the New York City Police Department." CCR has found that not only were a record number of 575,304 people stopped and frisked by police, but that 87% of them were either Black or Latin@.

Said CCR Executive Director Vincent Warren, "2009 was the worst year for stop-and-frisks on record. For many kids, getting stopped by the police while walking home from school has become a normal afterschool activity, and that's tragic. The public is demanding constructive change and an end to racially-biased policing by the NYPD."

The City often claims the racial disparity in stops is accounted for by the racial breakdown of crime suspects, but the data from the first three quarters of 2009 (fourth quarter detail unavailable at this time) reveal that "fits relevant description" is the reason for a stop only 15 percent of the time. Far and away the most often cited reason for a stop by the police is the vague and undefined, "furtive movements" (nearly 50 percent of all stops), and "casing a victim or location" (nearly 30 percent of all stops). Also listed are "inappropriate attire for season," "wearing clothes commonly used in a crime," and "suspicious bulge," among other boxes an officer can check off on the form.

Only 1.3 percent of the year's stops resulted in the discovery of a weapon, and only 6% of the stops resulted in arrests.

Said CCR Attorney Darius Charney, "This kind of heavy-handed policing promotes mistrust, doubt and fear of police officers in communities of color and only serves to make the police's job more difficult."
Look, I'm no cop-hater; my grandfather was a cop. In fact, he was a detective with the NYPD. But I do hate that cops are being given free rein to police in a way that is not only evident harassment but rife with the potential for the physical abuse of so-called suspects.

If a cop is a white supremacist, and all that's required to cover hir ass is a bullshit justification like "furtive movements," what's to stop hir from using the stop-and-frisk to secure opportunity to act out hir violent bigotry?

If a cop is a sexual predator, and all that's required to cover hir ass is a bullshit justification like "furtive movements," what's to stop hir from using the stop-and-frisk as part of hir predation?

That the obvious answer to these questions is "nothing" underlines how utterly fucked-up this situation really is.

Oh, and in case you were wondering, Blacks and Latin@s, who comprised 87% of the NYPD's stop-and-frisks last year, are respectively 25% and 28% of New York City's total population.

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime



Iggy Pop: "Search and Destroy"

Open Wide...

Assvertising, Part 100

Daughter: Morning!

Dad: You got in pretty late last night

Daughter: Dad, I'm not 16 anymore.

Dad: Still, it was late

Daughter: Well, you won't have to worry about that anymore (reveals an engagement ring)

Dad. Todd's a lucky man...that's what I told him when we talked last week.
This commercial is not new, but I heard it for the first time this morning on the Weather Channel, as I was getting my daily Winter Weather Advisory.

Folgers has a robust tradition of sexist commercials, and The Frisky covered this one last month. The comments there are, alas, mostly of the "I don't see the sexism" and "It's cute and sweet--deal with it" and "must we look for sexism and invent things to be offended about" variety. It's a total bingo card. Buggie at the Feministing community covered the ad as well, and the comments there had a feeling of "of course parents worry about their kids being out late" and "shrug--it's just a tradition".

The posts at The Frisky and Feministing point out that the advert shows ownership of the daughter changing hands from father to husband. I would add that the father has granted his permission for this change of ownership at the request of the husband-to-be and without the daughter's knowledge. The commercial would have us believe that it's a sweet and loving gesture. Apparently, many people agree.

The dad's smugness as he lets his daughter know she isn't doing anything without his say-so riles me.

I am equally disturbed by the sexism of the commercial and the fact that this woman-as-property concept is so normalized that many (maybe even most) people don't see a problem with it and even find it charming.

I'm not saying that you and you and you should drop your family traditions. Just don't tell me they are not sexist and expect a credulous response.

[Assvertising: Parts One, Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, Seven, Eight, Nine, Ten, Eleven, Twelve, Thirteen, Fourteen, Fifteen, Sixteen, Seventeen, Eighteen, Nineteen, Twenty, Twenty-One, Twenty-Two, Twenty-Three, Twenty-Four, Twenty-Five, Twenty-Six, Twenty-Seven, Twenty-Eight, Twenty-Nine, Thirty, Thirty-One, Thirty-Two, Thirty-Three, Thirty-Four, Thirty-Five, Thirty-Six, Thirty-Seven, Thirty-Eight, Thirty-Nine, Forty, Forty-One, Forty-Two, Forty-Three, Forty-Four, Forty-Five, Forty-Six, Forty-Seven, Forty-Eight, Forty-Nine, Fifty, Fifty-One, Fifty-Two, Fifty-Three, Fifty-Four, Fifty-Five, Fifty-Six, Fifty-Seven, Fifty-Eight, Fifty-Nine, Sixty, Sixty-One, Sixty-Two, Sixty-Three, Sixty-Four, Sixty-Five, Sixty-Six, Sixty-Seven, Sixty-Eight, Sixty-Nine, Seventy, Seventy-One, Seventy-Two, Seventy-Three, Seventy-Four, Seventy-Five, Seventy-Six, Seventy-Seven, Seventy-Eight, Seventy-Nine, Eighty, Eighty-One, Eighty-Two, Eighty-Three, Eighty-Four, Eighty-Five, Eighty-Six, Eighty-Seven, Eighty-Eight, Eighty-Nine, Ninety, Ninety-One, Ninety-Two, Ninety-Three, Ninety-Four, Ninety-Five, Ninety-Six, Ninety-Seven, Ninety-Eight, Ninety-Nine.]

Open Wide...

Lost Open Thread


Last night's episode will be discussed in infinitesimal detail, so if you haven't seen it, and don't want any spoilers, move along...

Open Wide...

Oh, Hillary!

Zing:

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton could not escape U.S. politics during her trip to Saudi Arabia.

Early [yesterday] morning during a town hall meeting with students at Dar Al Hekma College, a student asked Clinton if she thinks Sarah Palin will be president and whether Hillary would move to Canada if Palin were elected.

The audience laughed -- so did Clinton -- before she said, "Well, the short answer is no. I will not be immigrating. I will be visiting as often as I can."

Open Wide...