Brace Yourselves, Fatsronauts

During the President's State of the Union address, he announced that First Lady Michelle Obama would soon be launching a national anti-obesity campaign centered on childhood obesity. Lynn Sweet reports that the campaign will be elaborately debuted tomorrow:

Mrs. Obama's East Wing said she will be "joined by members of the president's cabinet, as well as media, sports, entertainment, and business leaders," plus mayors, member of the medical community and others at the White House event. On Tuesday evening, Mrs. Obama will sit down with CNN's Larry King for an interview about obesity and her first year as first lady. She will take questions from viewers.

"Over the past three decades, childhood obesity rates in America have tripled; nearly one third of children in America are now overweight or obese," the East Wing said in a statement. "The First Lady will announce the elements of the nationwide campaign, which will put us on track to solve the problem of childhood obesity in a generation."
Right from the get-go, the messaging on this is flatly atrocious. Positioning this as an "anti-obesity" campaign is just going to reinforce—and justify—fat hatred. Obama (and anti-obesity crusaders like her) can argue from here to Kingdom Come and back again that "anti-obesity" campaigns aren't about hating fat people, but the reality is that "obesity" doesn't exist outwith people. And, unlike a disease like, say, diabetes, there's an endemic institutional prejudice against fat people. There's a reason why "fat joke" is a term with which everyone's familiar, and "diabetic joke" isn't.

Recently, Iain—who is fat, diabetic, and athletic—began training for the Chicago Marathon. To me, this is wholly unremarkable, because I know how fit he is. But of those who know him and have expressed surprised, their shock was not that a diabetic person who has experienced symmetrical peripheral polyneuropathy was training for a marathon, but that a fat person was training for a marathon.

"Obesity" simply defines fat people in a way that most other physical differences (rightly or wrongly) called disease don't.

I am a fat person; being fat is a defining part of who I am because fat-hatred is something with which I contend on a regular basis—and my reaction to it determines how I am perceived by the world.

That's not something over which I, or any fat person, has any control.

And as long as we are externally defined by our fatness, "anti-obesity" is, quite literally, an attack on a part of us, on us.

"Anti-obesity" will remain functionally indistinguishable from "anti-obese person."

How about an "anti high-fructose corn syrup" campaign? How about an "anti feeding families shitty food is cheaper than feeding families healthy food" campaign? How about an "anti farm subsidies" campaign?

Oh. Right. Because that might hurt the feelings of corporations. Better that we spare the delicate fee-fees of corporations and make life even harder for fat kids.

[Commenting Guidelines: I support a Health at Every Size model. Commenters wishing to debate about fat, the aesthetics of fat, the ethics of fat, DEATHFAT!, or in any other way engage in fat-hating and/or the shaming/blaming of fat people, will find no harbor for that in this thread. We have debated "fat" before here; we're not doing it again.]

Open Wide...

Between Storms

Pittsburgh and the surrounding areas are digging out from the big snowstorm on Friday/Saturday. Snowfall totals around Allegheny County were between 15 and 23 inches. In Pittsburgh, we got 20 inches and Friday's 11.4-inch snowfall beat the one-day total of 10.4 in. It was 4 degrees Fahrenheit when I got up this morning, so this snow is not going anywhere on its own.

My internet connection was out for a day and a half this weekend, and another winter storm advisory takes effect tomorrow morning. So, in case I get cut off again, here are a few images from between snowstorms.

On Saturday morning, I awoke to find that my usual view of downtown Pittsburgh looked like this:

A snow-covered roof and a tree bent with the weight of snow
There was about 14 inches of snow on the roof next door, and the tree, which usually does not obscure the window at all, was bent all the way down to the neighbor's roof with snow.

Open Wide...

Superbowl Ads: Open Thread

I watched nothing but the last three game minutes of the Superbowl yesterday, and didn't see any of the commercials until this morning. Shaker plussziedfeminist sent me this one from Dove, which is just absolutely absurd.


Singing voiceover (over images of a man throughout his life, starting with sperm fertilizing an egg, a crying baby, elementary school class picture, playing high school football, getting married, etc.): Get born, get slapped, now get to school / Get good at sports, always look cool / Get [?], get strong, know how to fight / Stay out late, but be polite / Find a nice girl who'll say "I do" / Then have three kids who'll look just like you / [?] the leaves from the hedge and mow the yard / "Honey, can you open this jar?" / If you hear a noise in the middle of the night, check it out with a flashlight! / You've reached the stage where you feel at ease / You've come this far and it wasn't a breeze / You can take on anything; of course you can! / Because...you're a MAN!

Spoken voiceover (over image of man looking self-satisfied, then in shower, then images of product): Now that you're comfortable with who you are, isn't it time for comfortable skin? At last there's Dove for Men. Introducing Dove Men + Care. A new range body and face wash. Be comfortable in your own skin.
And Shaker TheFatLadySings mentioned this one from Dodge (voiced over by Michael C. Hall—sob!) in comments:

Voiceover (over images of various men looking utterly morose and defeated): I will get up and walk the dog at 6:30am. I will eat some fruit as part of my breakfast. I will shave. I will clean the sink after I shave. I will be at work by 8am. I will sit through two-hour meetings. I will say yes when you want me to say yes. I will be quiet when you don't want to hear me say no. I will take your call. I will listen to your opinion of my friends. I will listen to your friends' opinions of my friends. I will be civil to your mother. I will put the seat down. I will separate the recycling. I will carry your lip balm. I will watch your vampire TV shows with you. I will take my socks off before getting into bed. I will put my underwear in the basket. And because I do this [cut to image of black Dodge Charger speeding on the open road], I will drive the car I WANT TO DRIVE. Charger: MAN'S LAST STAND. [The words appear onscreen in all caps. More images of car, set to Bond-like music.]
The thing I love most about this second one is that the entire narrative is submission to nagging women, with "I will be at work by 8am. I will sit through two-hour meetings." stuck in the middle. Um. Okay. Right. Because women totes structured and run corporate America. Blink.

The few others I've seen, including the talking eTrade baby sexualized and having an affair on his baby girlfriend with a "milkaholic" baby whore (?!), have been dreadful. A lot of terribly sexist swill. We are deep into the backlash, Shakers.

Discuss.

Open Wide...

Open Thread


Hosted by Humpty Dumpty.

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime



Billie Holiday: "Strange Fruit"

Open Wide...

Russian Debate About Rights of the Disabled

(Trigger warning: this post discusses a progressive response to a violent 'solution' to the problem of people with disabilities, as well as some language which will be very offensive to people with disabilities)

As I've mentioned before, I'm a translator by trade (and yes, please, if you have work!), of French, German and Russian to English.

One of my Russian friends posted a link today to a post on Livejournal - which has always had a thriving Russian-speaking community, where it's called "zheh-zheh", analogous to our "el-jay" - about a journalist on a Moscow radio station who'd posed the question: "Do 'defective' children have the right to life?"

Seriously. With a question mark. The radio report was following up on an intense public debate about so-called "mercy killing", inspired by an article by a journalist named A.P. Nikonov.

The post contains the text of a letter sent to the Russian President, and to the Ombudsperson for Children, by some parents of children with Down Syndrome. Now, there's not a lot we can contribute from outside to that debate; I've included a rough translation of the text of the post below. I wanted to say publicly that they have my support, of little value though it may be, and that I hope they have great success.

Mostly I wanted to point out that, although it looks from the outside to be (and is, in many ways) a very socially conservative country, Russia has its own progressives, and they're fighting the good fight just as we are.

If anything, they're currently fighting a more dangerous fight than we - well, not as much Russia anymore, but certainly in other countries around the world, each having their own clusters of progressivist elements, many of them facing serious consequences, from loss of housing or employment to imprisonment, torture, and/or execution.

And this is where I turn to an unabashed plug for Amnesty International. I've had the pleasure of being a small-scale activist for AI for many years, writing my letters to ambassadors and heads of state, demanding human rights for prisoners of conscience, or those facing cruel and unusual punishment.

Many of those unjustly held, imprisoned without the usual rights obtaining to membership in the human race, are progressives like you and I, who just happen to have been born in a place with a somewhat more repressive government (and how deep the shame to know that my government, and that of the US, have been complicit in a horrid abuse of human rights at Guantanamo). People like Nelson Mandela of South Africa, Aung San Suu Kyi of Myanmar, the Dalai Lama of Tibet, and thousands more, punished for having the nerve to put forward the radical idea of treating all people with basic respect.

The nice thing about Amnesty is, it's *easy* to be an activist for them. You just write letters, mostly. Sure, they need money like any organization, but you can contribute even if you don't have money to give, which is one reason I like them so much.

So, yeah. Plug, plug. Also, bravo/a to our Russian colleagues, and good luck to them with their petition.

The translated post (I'm dashing this off quickly, and if I make any notable errors, I'm hoping one of our resident Shaker russophones can let me know):

Dear friends and professionals!

The debate is everywhere right now about the 'issue' raised by the journalist A.P.Nikonov, in his piece "Mercy-killing: to relieve suffering". The radio station Echo of Moscow posed a question: "Do 'defective' children have the right to life?" Just like that, with a question mark. Apparently this radio journalist has forgotten that in our country, every citizen has the guaranteed right to life, and that we are party to a UN Convention which separately stipulates that people living with developmental disabilities (or, in the language of the journalist, 'defectives') have the same rights as other citizens.

An online community of parents raising children with Down Syndrome (these children having become one of the main targets) are sending a letter of protest to the President of our country (in his role as guarantor of the Constitution), and to Pavel Astakhov, ombudsperson for children in Russia. The letter reads as follows:

Dear Pavel:

We, the parents of children with Down Syndrome, ask you to protect us and our children from those who abuse us in the media, namely A.P. Nikonov, in his article "Mercy-killing: to relieve suffering", and the radio broadcast "Echo of Moscow", specifically the one about "Do 'defective' children have the right to life?"

We believe that it is unacceptable to label our children 'chunks of meat', or 'biomass', or 'broken diskette', or 'retard'.

We believe that the honour and dignity of parents of children with disabilities have been harmed by such statements as "Most normal people turn over their defective children to state custody," and "They're crazy, these little mothers," and "They screw up their own lives, turn themselves into holy martyrs," and so on.

We believe there was much that was offensive in the language and tone in both article and broadcast, as well as the very idea of a public discussion of presenting a possible 'solution' to the parents/mother: euthanasia, so soon as the child is born (the so-called 'post-natal abortion').

We believe that such statements as "And you and your family's lives won't be screwed up, and the state - and I, as a taxpayer - won't have to rear this monster in a home," and the thesis of "deep sleep" for "substandard children who will be a burden on the society, in preference to those who are healthy".

We believe that the touching-off of this intense public debate, using offensive terminology, and given Mr. Nikonov's statements aimed at the most vulnerable members of our society, causes grave damage to the cause - newly taken up in our society - of moving towards accommodating the needs of those living with disabilities, and understanding their difficulties.

And we believe that the consequences of such publications/broadcasts can be very serious, particularly with note of the fact that more and more children with disabilities are remaining with their families.

We ask you, as Ombudsperson for Children in Russia, and as a lawyer, to evaluate these messages yourself, and to protect the honour and dignity of parents of children with disabilities, as well as the rights of our children, who are the most socially vulnerable people in our society. Also, we strongly urge you to prevent future dissemination of messages which express contempt for, or urge humiliation of, persons with disabilities.

(signatures follow, and instructions for how to send messages to the right people)

Open Wide...

Open Thread


Hosted by the cutest little knitted squid evarrr and a cup of coffee.

This week's open threads have been brought to you by squid. Squid: Bringing the awesome since 1742.

Open Wide...

Open Thread


Hosted by the Cat in the (Squid) Hat.

Open Wide...

The Virtual Pub Is Open


[Explanations: fatso-fu. lol your fat. pathetic anger bread. hey your gay.]

TFIF, Shakers!

Belly up to the bar,
and name your poison!

Open Wide...

Important Announcement

If I have to listen to one more dipshit say they're rooting for the New Orleans Saints in the Superbowl "ya know, because of Katrina," my head is going to fucking explode.*

Because here's the thing: I keep hearing that saccharine, pithy, bullshit well-wishing for the inconceivably wealthy football players who play in the Superdome falling out of many of the same mouths I heard victim-blaming the poor, infirm, disabled, elderly, adolescent, infant, and/or otherwise unprivileged—or just fucking unlucky—people who were trapped in and around the Superdome in the aftermath of Katrina, hungry, thirsty, scared, unsafe, surrounded by the dead and dying, and swimming in a river of piss and shit.

No. You don't get to be indifferent to human suffering while it's happening, and then five years later go on about how you hope that town wins the Superbowl because of all that suffering, like you're some kind of compassionate hero.

If you can root for football players to win a fucking game, but can't root for your fellow Americans to be delivered from a waking nightmare no person should even have to contemplate, there's something deeply wrong with you.

And you really just need to STFU about your magical football hopes for NOLA. Because you're a jackass.

-------------------------------

* No, I'm not talking about people who remark, quite rightly, that this is good for the city of New Orleans, economically and spiritually.

Open Wide...

Today's Edition of "Conniving and Sinister"



Blank

Strips One, Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, Seven, Eight, Nine, Ten, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109. In which Liss reimagines the long-running comic "Frank & Ernest," about two old straight white guys "telling it like it is," as a fat feminist white woman and a biracial queerbait telling it like it actually is from their perspectives. Hilarity ensues.

Open Wide...

SNN: Breaking News

This just in:

Several days ago, Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-o_O) officially withdrew herself as a speaker from the terribly exciting Tea Party Convention, "due to conflicting advice on whether Congresswoman Bachmann’s participation in the upcoming Tea Party Nation Convention would be in line with the Committee on Standards."

As it turns out, her withdrawal had nothing to do with standards. Portions of Bachmann's planner have been leaked clearly showing that she had the next couple of days blocked out for secret meetings with several Al-Qaeda terrorist cells.

Pass it on.

Open Wide...

Texting! With Liss and Deeks!

Deeky @ 9:31am: When your tired ass gets out of bed and has a moment, can you add the Assvertising code to the bottom of my post in drafts?

[Liss ignores this text for an hour because she left her phone in the living room.]

Liss @ 10:37am: I only just noticed this text now – sorry! I'll add it right away!

[Liss adds text; publishes posts; checks email. Finds email from Deeky asking if she ever got that damn text.]

Liss: I just got your email. I guess we're telekinetic now.

Deeky: That was inevitable.

Liss: LOL!

Deeky: So, what am I thinking about right now?

Liss: Wieners.

Deeky: I hate you.

Liss: LOLOLOL! Yeah, 'cuz I was right!

Open Wide...

Photo of the Day



Because it's turned into that kind of day...

Open Wide...

Friday Blogaround

This blogaround brought to you by Shaxco, publishers of "From Here to Absurdity: The Collected Letters of Liss and Deeky."

Recommended Reading:

Echidne: Some Good News

Mannion: What They Told Each Other at Lunch Yesterday

Andy: CBS to Air Second Focus on the Family Tebow Ad on Pre-Game Show

Tami: More Exploitation of Brown Bodies

Fannie: Dude Mansplains the Lesbian Life Experience

LeMew: The Court and African-Americans

Leave your links in comments...

Open Wide...

Quote of the Day

"The vice president needs to step up to his constitutional duty as presiding officer of the Senate and begin overturning those age-old parliamentary precedents that now allow partisan obstructionists to eviscerate all semblance of majority rule. Until that's done, Republicans will have no incentive to agree to any real compromises, Democrats will continue trying to pass legislation without them, and everyone will come out a loser."Steven Pearlstein, in the Washington Post, commenting on "The myth of Washington bipartisanship and the art of true compromise."

Open Wide...

Obama Gives Choice A Pass

Here's an intersting (meaning "infuriating") bit of analysis from the Guttmacher Institute. President Obama's new budget fails to address any of the current anti-choice policies currently in place, including the Hyde Amendment.

On abortion rights, however, the president is taking a pass. There can be little doubt that the fact that health care reform legislation remains in limbo has something to do with that—with the options on an ultimate compromise on abortion coverage ranging from terrible to horrible. Also tied up in health care reform is the fate of two other key provisions: one to make it easier for states to expand eligibility for family planning under Medicaid and a second to establish new funding for home visiting programs for low-income first-time mothers. [Emphasis mine.]
More here.

Remember how we were all told we just had to vote Dem, because who else was going to protect Roe v Wade? Yeah, okay.

Open Wide...

OFFS

Shaker ErinM emails (which I am posting with her permission):

From the "We don't sexualize little girls enough already" Department. Miley Cyrus' little sister Noah, age nine, NINE, is launching a lingerie line for kids. The article is pretty gross as well, with its slut-shaming of a nine year old. I weep for little girls everywhere, and hope this line is a miserable, miserable failure, because parents refuse to put their little girls in sexually suggestive clothing. It's a vain hope, I know, but I still hope.
Just...no.

Open Wide...

Anti-Choicers Targeting Black Women in Atlanta

Renee at Womanist Musings emailed me about "an anti-abortion group in Atlanta [that] is targeting Black women by putting up billboards stating that Black children are an endangered species." No, really.


Renee notes:
As proof of this claim they offer the fact that Blacks account for 30% of the general population and 56% of the abortions.

...We already know that a woman living alone with a child is more likely to be poor and therefore when we factor in racism, it is quite obvious that poverty would increase. Would it really be so hard to suggest that part of the reason that the rate of abortion is so high is because Black women are already aware of the herculean task and are simply opting out due to a lack of community support and government funding?
It's not an unreasonable suggestion at all, of course. We know, for example, that 73% of women (pdf) seeking to terminate a pregnancy cite "Can't afford a baby now" as their reason for seeking an abortion.
In the qualitative sample, of women who stated that they could not afford to have a child now, the majority had children already. Financial difficulties included the absence of support from the father of either the current pregnancy or the woman's other children, anticipating not being able to continue working or to find work while pregnant or caring for a newborn, not having the resources to support a child whose conception was not planned and lacking health insurance.
Additionally, about one-fourth of participants in the qualitative sample cited her own health or possible health problems with the fetus as reasons for the abortion, citing concerns including "a lack of prenatal care." The US Department of Health and Human Services reports that "about 30 percent of Hispanic and 20 percent of black Americans lack a usual source of health care compared with less than 16 percent of whites."

Renee notes that this subject, the targeting of black women by anti-choice campaigns, isn't getting nearly the same attention as, for example, the Focus on the Family ad that is due to run during the Superbowl: "Finally, as scared as White women may be to interact because of the racial undertones of this argument, I must ask don't Black women matter? ... If abortion were to be outlawed tomorrow, more children may indeed be born, however you would also see a rise in the deaths of Black women due to back alley abortions. The Black woman has a right to life and this must be forcefully asserted."

A right to an autonomous life that includes the right to choose, which must be forcefully defended.

And, in my opinion, if not the opinion of glibertarian shits whose privilege affords them a personal security they erroneously attribute to bootstraps, a right to a life rich with opportunity, and comfortable in the security of a strong social safety net that means never having to decide between paying the electric bill or paying for prenatal care.

That any country who forces women to make such decisions has the temerity to call itself civilized is beyond me.

Open Wide...

Daily Kitteh



Potter says "Leave me alone!"

Open Wide...