Ok, I admit this was inspired by hearing "Danger Zone" on the radio the other day in the car:
What is your favorite song from a movie?
This was hard for me to come up with one but I have to say it's probably this:
"By attending the National Prayer Breakfast, elected leaders lend legitimacy to an organization whose ideas and practices are antithetical to the American ideals of transparency and high ethical standards. As a result, CREW strongly urges you to decline to attend the breakfast and to ask those in your caucuses to do the same."—Melanie Sloan, Executive Director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), in a letter (pdf) exhorting President Barack Obama, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, and House Minority Leader John Boehner to skip The Family's National Prayer Breakfast this week.
I'm going to go ahead and guess this will be another round of: Sure, it pisses off progressives when Dems attend, but we've got to pander to the ringwing, and, hell, where else are the lefties gonna go har har?
Still, kudos to CREW for laying out the case so splendidly and expecting more.
No, really.
Yep. Mr. Universe would be so happy.
"She'll chat with you endlessly about your interests. And she'll have sex whenever you please. [...] "She doesn't vacuum or cook, but she does almost everything else," said her inventor, Douglas Hines."Cause what we really need in the world is yet another commercialization of women's bodies for men's sexual desire, yet another way for men to become acclimated to the idea that women aren't really people.
by Shaker L
It was our fourth (or maybe fourth-and-a-half) date and we have plans for dinner and gawking at people in L.A. pretending to be cowboys. We always had fun and I expected tonight to be no exception. Except... a pattern had emerged where I felt a little sexually bullied. Not powerfully aggressed on, just a little invisible. As if his approach to increasing intimacy was it's-better-to-ask-for-forgiveness-than-permission.
Suffice to say, I didn't like it.
So we got in the car but, before we took off, I told him, in the nicest possible way (really), that I felt bullied and a little invisible sometimes. I asked him to be more gentle and to check in with me a bit more. I bookended the request with how much fun I was having with him and how I was pleasantly surprised as to how much I liked him and all that good stuff.
Now, how might a well-adjusted, emotionally-mature man who is genuinely interested in me respond?
Yeah, that's not what he did.
He told me that no one had ever expressed such a sentiment to him before and that he was a super gentle guy and would never do anything violent to any woman. Then he said that he never felt like he was aggressing on me in any way. "But if you feel that way, well I guess that's how you feel." He asked me if I could give him an example, so I did. And he said that that was not how he remembered it, "but I guess if that's how you remember it, then that's how you remember it."
Um, so far no good dude.
But even so! I responded reassuringly (even as I noted that he had turned the tables such that I had to respond reassuringly to him when I was the one feeling threatened) and reiterated that I liked him and was telling him these things exactly because I wanted to go forward blah blah blah.
And then he broke up with me!
First he said that he didn't think things were going to work out anyway because I was going on a trip for 10 days. At which I made a confused face and he explained that I'd probably want to do whatever I wanted to do on that trip and, not that we were serious or monogamous or anything, but...
And I made a confused face again.
So then he said that it probably sounded like he was breaking up with me because I wasn't on the fast track to sex (no, not at all!) and that that wasn't the case (even though we were, literally, at the precipe of a date).
Instead, he said, there were just some dealbreakers (that he hadn't bothered to bring up till now). And I said, "oh, ok" (and at this point I'm just plain amused), "um, do you want to run them by me just to be sure or no?" So then he says, well I have this picture of Jesus in my car (which is true) and, you know...
And so I said, "okay so you're religious?" and he was like "yeah... blah blah blah" and also Jesus is white in this picture and I'm sure you're thinking "shouldn't Jesus be dark-skinned because it was the Mediterranean" and stuff...
And I made a really confused face.
Because how could he have known that the misrepresentation of Christ is the reason I have to break up with every guy I ever meet! Curse be oh those gazillion images that ensure my singlehood just because they exist!
Yeah, so then I got out of the car, went home, called my friends, laughed, and went out to see a band.
Earlier today, President Obama sent Congress a $3.83 trillion budget that will "pour more money into the fight against high unemployment, boost taxes on the wealthy and freeze spending for a wide swath of government programs. The deficit for this year would surge to a record-breaking $1.56 trillion, topping last year's then unprecedented $1.41 trillion gap. The deficit would remain above $1 trillion in 2011."
Washington Post: "To put people back to work, Obama proposes to spend about $100 billion immediately on a jobs bill that would include tax cuts for small businesses, social-safety-net programs, and aid to state and local governments. To reduce deficits, he would impose new fees on some of the nation's largest banks and permit a range of tax cuts to expire for families earning more than $250,000 a year, in addition to freezing non-security spending for three years."
New York Times:
No budget proposal is ever enacted wholesale by Congress, and the spreadsheet-boggling numbers in the White House plan are sure to produce anguished partisan and ideological debates over how best to address the deficit and the nation’s lingering economic problems between now and the start of the new fiscal year next Oct. 1 — if indeed Congress manages to complete its work by then, right before the midterm elections.Mmm, I love the smell of bipartisanship in the morning. Or afternoon. Whatever.
...In brief remarks in the Grand Foyer at the White House, the president outlined the principles contained in his budget, saying: "Changing spending as usual depends on changing politics as usual." He offered several examples of programs he believes should be eliminated and urged Congress to follow suit.
"I'm asking Republicans and Democrats alike to take a fresh look at programs they supported in the past to see what's working and see what's not and trim back accordingly," Mr. Obama said.
"It's not a left-wing budget. It's not a right-wing budget," White House Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer said in a briefing for reporters Sunday. "It's a pragmatic budget. It's a common-sense budget.Oh jaysus. Not that old chestnut again.
This blogaround brought to you by Shaxco, makers of Liss and Deeky's Lostfan Organic Sedatives. Note: This product has been recalled for poor performance.
Recommended Reading:
Marcella: Carnival Against Sexual Violence 87
Chally: The Thirteenth Carnival of Feminists
Resistance: Orphans, orphans, orphans!
Andy: Pope Benedict Precedes UK Visit with Bashing of Gays, Equality
Nura Iro Maaji: Early Marriage and the State of Adolescent Girls in Kano State, Nigeria, Part 1 [Part 2 will be up later today.]
Anna: Action Item (US): Ask your rep to co-sponsor the Technology Bill of Rights for the Blind
LeMew: Blaming the Victim
Melissa: Johnny. JOHNNY. WTF?!!
Leave your links in comments...
Hollywood might represent another side of the American Dream, but to many it often embodies a true nightmare, especially for young actors. Dustin Diamond is best known for his character Samuel Screech Powers in the late '80s and '90s on the long-running American TV teen sitcom Saved by the Bell (SBTB). Diamond's new book gives readers the disheartening story of an ex-child star. Dustin faced serious challenges moving his career beyond his comic role as the smart, funny, and endearing nerd of Bayside High School on the show that made him an audience favourite. Through his eyes, we uncover Hollywood's myths and see what happens when the lights go out and career expectations are shattered. Dustin also reveals how working as a child actor on SBTB created emotional turmoil that hurt his life at home and his future. For the first-time, Diamond presents the inside story of the young cast from Saved by the Bell that the viewing public thought were so lucky...In hardcover.
Our friend C.L. Minou has a great new piece up at The Guardian's Cif about Julie Bindel's dangerous transphobia (which we've previously discussed).
What is astonishing about Bindel's writing on transsexuals, which has been published in the Guardian, is how often it resembles the diatribes of anti-gay bigots: the disregard of our own voices, the disbelief that transness is anything but a degeneracy, and the general air of condescension and paternalism.Read the whole thing here.
Gays and lesbians have long known that such diatribes are not merely "offensive," but dangerous – as is transphobic writing like Bindel's, and for the same reason: they support social attitudes that have often proven deadly for trans people. According to the Transgender Day of Remembrance web site, 130 people were murdered in 2009 simply because they were transgendered – and those were only the deaths that were reported. Like gay and lesbian people, trans people face the very real threat of violence every day simply for being themselves. Very often, even in places where legal protection exists for gays and lesbians, no similar protection exists for trans people.
That Stonewall, an organisation named for riots that were led in part by a trans woman, Sylvia Rivera, should honour a writer with such disdain for the transgendered was a profound insult. Its action deserved protest, but protest is not censorship, as Campbell argued. Neither is the NUS applying its "no-platform" policy to Bindel nor other groups who no longer want her to appear at their functions. This is more a sign of an evolution of the modern feminist movement away from its historic transphobia towards an inclusive model; one that, as Laurie Penny puts it, "...holds that gender identity, rather than being written in our genes, is an emotional, personal and sexual state of being that can be expressed in myriad different ways that encompass and extend beyond the binary categories of 'man' and 'woman'".
New York Times: Forces Pushing Obama on 'Don't Ask, Don’t Tell'.
Not the armed forces. Not the radicalized marching forces of the Gay Agenda's Sod Squad. Political forces:
It is undeniable that a variety of 21st-century forces — a new generation in the military, a change in climate at the top levels of the Pentagon, pressure on the president from a critical interest group, even Senator Kirsten E. Gillibrand's anticipated Democratic primary battle in New York — converged to begin repeal of a 1993 law that has led to the discharge of more than 13,000 gay men and lesbians, including desperately needed Arabic translators.Awesome to see forces like "decency" and "fairness" and "equality" still not making the list. But those are silly words for babies, not concepts with which Important Grown-Ups Who Do Politics concern themselves.
"In the middle of two wars and in the middle of this giant security threat," Representative John A. Boehner of Ohio, the Republican leader, said Sunday on "Meet the Press" on NBC, "why would we want to get into this debate?"Good question. How about we just not debate it and repeal the ban tout de suite? No, no—Boehner's right. We should definitely wait until there are no more security threats in the world and then have the debate. As soon as there's World Peace, then we can talk about gays and lesbians joining the military!
I saw some pretty intersting items up for grabs at the antique mall this weekend. I'm not sure there are rules for what does or doesn't qualify as "antique" but I'd hazard a guess some of these aren't "antique," so much as "old crap."
I snapped some images of a few antique lunchboxes. And by antique, I mean, beat to shit.
The comments links on the main page are working again.
The Disqus threads look kinda funky at the moment, but just bear with me, and I'll try to get that back to normal as soon as possible. I'm also aware that the number of comments isn't showing up in IE, and I'm trying to resolve that.
Thanks for your continued patience as we play with the template and try to get everything working and looking good again.
My profound thanks to Portly Dyke, who has been a serious rockstar this weekend trying to get this thing figured out and creating a workable template for us. And also to Iain, who is totes a champion and provider of reserve patience when mine wears out.
