Roeder: I Was "Defending Innocent Life"

[Trigger warning.]

This guy makes my teeth clench together so hard I feel like I may spontaneously generate a new universe between my molars:

A man accused of shooting a Kansas abortion provider confessed to the slaying Monday, telling The Associated Press that he killed the doctor to protect unborn children.

Scott Roeder, 51, of Kansas City, Mo., spoke to the AP in a telephone call from jail, saying he plans to argue at his trial that he was justified in shooting Dr. George Tiller at the abortion provider's Wichita church in May.

"Because of the fact preborn children's lives were in imminent danger this was the action I chose. ... I want to make sure that the focus is, of course, obviously on the preborn children and the necessity to defend them," Roeder said.

"Defending innocent life — that is what prompted me. It is pretty simple," he said.
I just love this rationale and the rage-inducing parsing contained within. He's not a TOTAL FUCKING HYPOCRITE, you see, because he's specifically pro innocent life, so Dr. Tiller doesn't count.

Not that Dr. Tiller had broken any actual laws or anything (making him actually and technically "innocent"). But Tiller broke God's Law, according to Roeder, so he was justified in killing him. Interesting calculation, that. I wonder if Roeder would then support my right to kill anyone who broke a law I thought should be on the books, based on my random and personal belief system. (I don't want to kill anyone—but that's not really the point, now, is it?) Meanwhile...
His confession came on the same day several strident abortion opponents released their "Defensive Action Statement 3rd Edition" that proclaims any force that can be used to defend the life of a "born child is legitimate to defend the life of an unborn child." The statement's 21 signers demand Roeder's jurors be allowed to consider the "question of when life begins" in deciding whether lethal force was justified.

Among the signers are Eric Rudolph, James Kopp and Shelley Shannon — all serving prison time for targeting abortion doctors.
So, unless I'm mistaken, the signers are effectively signaling their intent to kill more abortion providers, which leaves me with two questions: 1. Does this not render them, according to their own twisted rationale, legitimate targets of anyone who wants to prevent the murders they intend to commit? 2. Why the fuck are they not in jail?

Open Wide...

Richmond Rape Case: 911 Caller Was Another Teenage Girl

[Trigger warning. Background on case here; follow-ups here and here.]

Via CNN, I find that the 911 caller who finally alerted police about the recent gang rape of a 15-year-old girl was another teenage girl, Margarita Vargas, who wasn't even there but heard about the rape from people talking about it around her neighborhood.

There are some triggery and/or generally objectionable things about this video—I strongly doubt that the young men watching the rape were "silent" and not egging each other on; I really don't like a card to the survivor being read at all, no less the one they chose, which implies that being a victim and a strong survivor are mutually exclusive identities (excuse me, but I was victimized by a person and survived the event)—but it's worth watching/reading for Vargas, who is (unfortunately) extraordinary.

And isn't it interesting that no mention is made of Vargas' gender. She's just "another teenager with a conscience," as if it's incidental that the one teenager about whom we've heard in this mess who identified with the basic humanity of the survivor is also female.

[Transcript below.]
Reporter Dan Simon, in voiceover: Richmond police say 10 or more people watched a young woman be raped and stood silent, reaching for their phones to take pictures, not to call 911. That call would come from someone who wasn't even there. 911 Operator on Audio Recording: 911, where's your emergency? Margarita Vargas on Audio Recording: Hi, um, it's in Richmond High School. Vargas, in news footage: I'm proud of myself. I feel, like, I know that I did the right thing. Simon, in voiceover: This is 18-year-old Margarita Vargas, who says she made that call after word had spread through the neighborhood that a girl had been raped on Richmond High's campus and was still there, motionless on the ground. 911 Operator on Audio Recording: Is she on the school property? Vargas on Audio Recording: Yeah, she's, like, in, in, in the back, though—she's back by the dumpsters. Vargas, in news footage: I was thinking to myself, I'm like, she probably would've been there the whole night, you know, until somebody wake up and see her there. Simon, in voiceover: Vargas says she can't believe that no one else apparently had the instinct to call. They were scared, she thinks, of being labeled a snitch. Vargas, in news footage: In Richmond, they, they either get killed; they get—something bad happens to them, you know, like they say: "Snitches get stitches." That's like the little phrase that they use, I hear. But, you know, I don't really consider me snitching. [edit; walking down the street with Simon] She was probably there for awhile; that's what I heard. Simon, in voiceover: When Vargas got to the scene that night to have a look, she says police were already there and the victim was on a stretcher being placed into an ambulance. Vargas, in news footage: I don't think she was wearing clothes, 'cause they wrapped her up very tight in a, in a, in a white [clears throat] blanket. Simon, sitting amidst cards and gifts for victim: This case has really touched a nerve across the country, so much so that the Richmond Police Department has received a significant amount of mail addressed to the victim; here is a card that reads, in part, "I pray that this event will not destroy you or your faith, that you will not be a victim, but a strong survivor. Simon, in voiceover: That the victim survived may not have even been possible had it not been for another teenager with a conscience. Dan Simon, CNN—Richmond, California.

Open Wide...

Daily Kitteh

My Cell Phone Takes Crappy Pix Edition


Matilda and Olivia confab re: world domination in an office chair.


Sophie rolls around looking cute.

After I snapped this picture of Sophs, she actually curled all the way backwards and grabbed one of her back feet and then pulled it into her mouth and NOM NOM NOM. It was so funny and adorable I had to leap immediately from the chair and snorgle her silly.

Open Wide...

Emma Update


That, for those who can't view the image, is a screen cap of Bernard-Henri Lévy's pro-Polanski petition, from which Emma Thompson's name has been removed. JOYBLUB!!!

Thank you, Ms. Thompson. You have long been a hero to many women's rights champions, myself included, for your inspiring activism against sex trafficking, racism, and sizism, among other causes, and your support of Polanski was heartbreaking. Your reversal is an affirming and motivating victory for demoralized anti-rape advocates, and I both applaud and am personally grateful for your openness, your willingness to listen and to revisit your position.

And Caitlin, for about the thousandth time: You rock.

Thanks also to Shaker HazelStone who worked with Caitlin and me to prepare a press release in order to honor Ms. Thompson's decision to remove her name from the petition.

UPDATE: And thanks to the Jezebels for their mad pestering skillz!

[Parts One, Two, Three, Four, Five.]

Open Wide...

Today's Edition of "Conniving and Sinister"



Blank

Strips One, Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, Seven, Eight, Nine, Ten, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64. In which Liss reimagines the long-running comic "Frank & Ernest," about two old straight white guys "telling it like it is," as a fat feminist white woman and a biracial queerbait telling it like it actually is from their perspectives. Hilarity ensues.

Open Wide...

On Female Filmmakers

Recently, Diane Tucker interviewed me for an article she was writing about the National Film Registry ignoring female filmmakers. The article has been published here (and you can vote to nominate the work of Frances Marion, Mary Ellen Bute, Julia Reichert, Jessie Maple, and Penny Marshall—information on whom Tucker has provided at the link—to the National Film Registry here until November 20).

The movie business "is absolutely consistently more difficult for women from beginning to the end," said Debra Zimmerman, executive director of the nonprofit organization Women Make Movies.

How difficult? Did you know that a woman has never won the Oscar for best directing? Maybe more to the point, only three have ever been nominated: Lena Wertmuller for 1975's Seven Beauties, Jane Campion for 1993's The Piano, and Sofia Coppola for 2003's Lost in Translation.

"It always comes back to male being treated as the default state of humanity, and female a deviation therefrom. This creates a culture in which men's stories are considered human stories to which everyone is expected to relate, while women's stories are considered an inferior subset," said cultural anthropologist Melissa McEwan, who writes about the political marginalization of gender-based groups on the Web site Shakesville.

Each time a woman's story is dismissed as "less than," it makes women "others" and makes them seem mysterious and incomprehensible to men, explained McEwan. "This underwrites the justification for ignoring women's stories on the ground they are inaccessible and uninteresting to men."

...It's a self-reinforcing cycle that results in women-centered films being branded genre films, McEwan told The Huffington Post. "Nora Ephron makes 'chick flicks', but Michael Bay doesn't make 'dick flicks'; he just makes movies."

Even Ephron, the writer-director whose hit movies include Sleepless in Seattle and You've Got Mail, finds it difficult to get studios to greenlight her scripts and scoffed, "I always think every movie should begin with a logo that says, for example, Warner Bros. did everything in its power to keep from making this movie."
Read the whole thing here. And don't forget to support women's nominations. (You, too, Shaker men!)

Open Wide...

What a Trainwreck

And now the fate of healthcare reform hangs in an intra-party fight over abortion:

In a move that will intensify the coming war over how to treat abortion in the health care bill, more than three dozen House Dems have signed a letter to Nancy Pelosi firmly pledging to vote against the bill if it contains an anti-abortion amendment.

A source sends over a working copy of the letter without the signatories, and the source says it currently bears the signatures of 41 House Dems. They're all vowing to vote No on a bill if it contains the Stupak amendment — enough to sink the bill.
As Members of Congress we believe that women should have access to a full range of reproductive health care. Health care reform must not be misused as an opportunity to restrict women's access to reproductive health services.

The Stupak-Pitts amendment to H.R. 3962, The Affordable Healthcare for America Act, represents an unprecedented and unacceptable restriction on women's ability to access the full range of reproductive health services to which they are lawfully entitled. We will not vote for a conference report that contains language that restricts women's right to choose any further than current law.
That's unequivocal, with no wiggle room.
Good to see Dems with some bloody principles.

Except...remember when being pro-choice was a standard Democratic principle?

I'm reminded all over again of the fight in '04 when Harry Reid became Senate Minority Leader, despite being anti-choice, and the fight in '05 about Bob Casey, the anti-choice Dem who stole Rick Santorum's Senate seat, and all the other various inside baseball arguments surrounding the Blue Dog-Big Orange-Conservative Democrat-win-at-all-costs fuckery that demoted women's fundamental right to bodily autonomy to a negotiable platform plank.

Five years ago, progressive feminists were cast as hysterics for shouting that conceding ground on choice, that not requiring a strong pro-choice position among the party's elected ranks (no less the party's leadership), would eventually lead to compromises that even classic Democrats could not abide. And here we are.

And all I can do is watch in horror as the party tears itself in half because it prioritized winning over undiluted support for equality.

Meanwhile, let us not forget that abortion rights were considered a legit bargaining chip because it was MORE IMPORTANT to win back the Congress and the White House so we could end those two wars and stop extraordinary rendition and close Guantanamo and end the era of presidential secrecy and...

That the trade-off ain't working any better for the people who were willing to throw my rights under the bus is no comfort at all. In fact, it somehow makes the whole goddamned mess even worse.

Open Wide...

We haven’t yet begun to fight…

Full disclosure – a bitch "reworked" President Obama's Making history email…just a wee bit…

Shall we?

Y'all,

Over the weekend, at 11:15 p.m. Saturday night, the House of Representatives voted to fuck women over when they passed a health insurance reform bill with an anti-choice amendment that includes a ban on private abortion coverage and would prohibit it in the public option. Despite countless attempts to lobby the House, enough members caved to anti-choice freaks 'cause some Dems managed to convince themselves that passing a health care reform bill that leaves women flattened by a bus is a legislative victory.

Legislating away reproductive health care is not how we define a victory.

Fucking women over and then acting shocked when we tell their ass there's gonna be a reckoning ain't special…it ain't new…and it ain't slick.

But change is in the air.

Members didn't just witness a massive legislative fail -- they helped make it happen.

Each "yes" vote was a fubar stand, backed up by countless hours of bullshit and misinformation…temper tantrums dressed up as town halls and hundreds of thousands of calls made by a handful of people and paid phoners urging members to throw women under the bus through that anti-choice amendment from hell.

Women stood up. Women spoke up. And once again we were ignored.

This is not a time to celebrate but they can bet their ass we aren't fixin' to rest.

Those who voted for reform that will not include coverage for women's reproductive health care deserve our wrath, and the next phase of this fight has already begun.

The final Senate bill hasn't even been released yet, but those who are organized against reproductive justice are already pressing hard to make sure real reform, reform that includes women's health care needs and addresses our concerns, fails even worse than it did in the House.

So, my fellow reproductive justice activists, it is time for us to build a massive neighborhood-by-neighborhood operation to bring women's voices to Congress.

It's safe to say we've seen the result of our lack of representation this weekend.

The coming days will put our movement to the ultimate test.

Winning will require each of us to give everything we can…again...starting right now.

Please donate $5…or whatever you can afford…to a pro-choice organization so we can finish this fight.

Pick up the phone and call the White House, your Senator and then call your friends and family and tell them to get their happy asses on the phone to do the same – real reform includes women's health care and victory is not achieved by throwing women under the bus!

The health care reform bill vote brought those in power closer to denying those in need the secure, affordable care that is our right. It was also a demonstration of how real progressive change is never made on the backs of the oppressed.

Even after last year's election, many politicians still think that the old formula of saying one thing to women's faces then doing a different thing when it comes time to vote…after we work our asses off to get them elected so that they could TAKE A MOTHERFUCKING STAND when it counted…would be enough to keep everyone happy.

Now, they're about to learn a lesson…because women intend to make it crystal clear: the old rules have changed -- and we will not be ignored.

In the final phases of last year's election, President Obama often reminded folks, "Don't think for a minute that power concedes without a fight," and damn it all if that isn't especially true today.

But that's okay -- we're not afraid of a fight. And we're willing and able to prove, when all of us work together, we have what it takes to win a real victory that includes women's health care.

Please lend your voice to pro-choice legislative action to win this fight and ensure that real health care reform…ya'know, the kind that includes reproductive health care for all Americans including women…reaches President Obama's desk by the end of this year:

Let's remind these fools exactly who helped make history last year…

…and let us re-commit to sending pro-choice progressive candidates capable of demonstrating bitchitude when it counts to Congress in 2010.

That reads sooooo much better than the original, don't you think?

Blink.

Y'all with me?

Let's do this!

Cross posted from AngryBlackBitch.com.

Open Wide...

Monday Blogaround

This blogaround brought to you by Shaxco, makers of Spudsy's Delicious Scooter Snak-Paks, for the zipster on the go.

Recommended Reading:

UPDATE: Feminist Majority Foundation: "The Stupak amendment far from being abortion neutral is an unacceptable, giant step backward for women."

Melissa: The Stupak-Pitts Amendment Hall of Shame

Amanda: Misogyny Hijacks Health Care Reform Vote

The Red Queen: Second Class Health Care for Second Class Citizens

Atrios: The Worst Person in the World

Angry Asian Man: Health Care Bill's Lone Republican Supporter: Anh 'Joseph' Cao

Andy: Health Care Bill Provision Would Fix Unjust Tax Laws for Gays

Leave your links in comments...

Open Wide...

Random That Mitchell and Webb Look Clip



Bawdy 1970's Hospital

[Cross-posted.]

Open Wide...

Quote of the Day

"There are people here, and there are youth here who aren't going to sit back and let legislation like this get passed again."Shagah Zakerion, one of the organizers of a rally at the State Capitol in Oklahoma to protest House Bill 1595, which will "collect personal details about every single abortion performed in the state and post them on a public website. ... Portions of the law were supposed to take effect on Nov. 1, but a judge delayed activation pending the outcome of a legal challenge."

The backlash to the backlash begins.

[H/T to Shaker IvyCeltress.]

Open Wide...

This is a real thing in the world.

Y'know—for kids!

I saw a commercial last night for the Duck Hunter, a new toy/game in which you set off an adorable little flying duck into the air—then SHOOT AT IT TO KILL IT! KILL IT! KILL IT! I couldn't yet find video of the advert (which features a dad and his son, naturally, enjoying Duck Hunter together and well away from any female things), but here's a dispatch from the Consumer Electronics Show, in which the correspondent is very excited about this adorable killing toy.


[Transcript and game image below; more demonstration video here.]

Target recommends it as a great Christmas gift! "Manufacturer's Suggested Age: 8 Years and Up."

Although hunting isn't a part of my personal culture, I sort of get the hunt-kill-eat variety; only one generation separates me from my people who raised and butchered their own livestock and poultry. Hunting purely for sport, on the other hand, I just flatly loathe. The thrill of killing is something I find distasteful and cruel—and, if I'm being honest, not a little bit frightening. Which is why Duck Hunter gives me a case of the creeps: It's skeet shooting with the added benefit (!) of getting to feel like you're killing a living thing. Joy.

Hi, this is Dan for Tech Digest and Shiny Shiny and I'm here at CES 2009 Unveiled. And I normally—I'm gettin' a little bit sick of these, uh, polystyrene flying objects, but this one [holds up Duck Hunter duck] is a little bit different—because it comes with [holds up Duck Hunter gun] a gun! Now this—what you do here—this is the Duck Hunter: You set it off [sets off duck to start flying, but doesn't let it go; its wings flap and make a loud chirping sound], like that, which is loud [turns off duck]; it then flies; you then take the gun, and you shoot it.

Now, when you shoot the thing, first of all, when you hit it once—let me see if I can do it. [turns duck back on; points gun at it and shoots; turns duck off] Ooh! There we go. It stutters—and if you do that three times, the thing crashes and dies to the ground. So you get the genuine killing experience, which is fantastic!

Um, it'll be out around the springtime; it's gonna retail at $29, which I think is bloody good value! I'll have three! And there is also an extreme pack as well, with all sorts of bits and pieces for $10 more, but I say get the bargain [one]. Look out for it.

Open Wide...

The Trials and Travails of Transness: My Body, My Choice

by Shaker Alexmac, a transgender woman studying at the University of Florida.

[Part 7 in an ongoing series: Part 1; Part 2; Part 3; Part 4; Part 5; Part 6.]

While transgender people have a large historical and cultural connection to the Cis LGB community, Transgender people (especially transsexuals) also have a lot in common with the feminist movement. Specifically, the reproductive rights movement. Just the most recent example is in health care reform, with Rep. Stupak and his merry band of anti-choice democrats attacking insurance coverage of abortion (apparently successfully...sigh) and a right-wing group attacking potential coverage for transition treatment costs. In fact they are using the same logic to attack it. They don't want to potentially pay to help the "trannies" or the "dirty sluts" who want access to legal medical procedures. Medical access is extremely important for trans people, especially because any transsexual who desires to be recognized by officials as their target sex must interact with the medical establishment and follow the legal procedures.

Let's first explore the actual process of medical transition as set forth by the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH), the organization of therapists and doctors which set up the current rules for transition. The rules can be found in the its 6th edition Standards of Care (pdf), hereafter SOC.

The first step for people wishing to transition is a visit to your friendly local gender therapist who must be convinced that hir patient is a "real" transexual. This is a major hurdle for many trans-people, who must bear not only the cost of an indefinite number of therapy sessions, but also the burden of proving to their therapists that they are trans. Depending on the therapist you find, it can be as simple as meeting hir and explaining how you feel, or as complicated as having to attend sessions presenting as the gender to which you want to transition without regard for any potential threats to personal safety, personal comfort with dressing as one's target gender before any physical alterations have begun, or any other considerations. In the latter case, you also often have to present in a very stereotypical way (for your target gender) or you aren't "serious" about transition.

An anecdote of this treatment can be seen Viviane Namaste's book Invisible Lives (via Whipping Girl).

One woman explained that she was initially denied hormones by her therapist when she showed up wearing 'male' clothes. She recounts: "I just went back, and this time I did all my makeup, inside and outside my eyes, wore my little fake fur jacket and my tight black plants. And she said 'you've come a long way since I saw you first. And now I am convinced that you're a transsexual.'"
Once this first hurdle is passed, the next one is hormones. If your therapist thinks you are sufficiently trans for their approval, they will write you a letter to see a doctor who can prescribe the hormones. Once you see the doctor (another big expense), you are then branded by the insurance company with a pre-existing condition, and more than likely none of your treatment costs from here on out will be covered.

You can then begin hormones, which won't be covered unless you have an experienced doctor to cook up a story for your medicine (I am being treated for a urinary condition. *wink*wink*)

The next step is up to you. You can continue to pass as your assigned gender while the hormones begin to change your body, or you can start the real-life experience at this point. The real-life experience is when a person lives full time as hir desired gender. Trans people must live full-time for at least 12 months and then they can be considered for surgery. During this time, they continue to see their therapists and, once the waiting period is over, they need to get a letter from two therapists before they can be approved for surgery. If all these conditions are met, then the trans person can have gender reassignment surgery (GRS).

Now, the SOC does allow some flexibility, but this is the process for the most part. It is set up as a gatekeeper model to test how badly trans people want to transition and is not set up to focus on actually improving the mental health of trans people. Up until last month, Thailand did not follow the SOC and that allowed many people to avoid at least some of the hoops, but looks like that loop is closed. For those who are too poor to see a therapist and doctor, there are black market hormones, silicone injections and even back-alley butchers to perform surgery for them. (For more insight on how the SOCs are inherently abusive economically, physically, and emotionally, due to the power therapists and doctors are given over trans people, read here.)

Is any of this sounding familiar? Trans people, like fertile cis-women, are not allowed to choose for themselves to have access to a legal medical procedure which can seriously affect their quality of life. We are both paternalistically denied treatment with the excuse that some may regret their decisions. Likewise, the poor among us are unable to access treatment due to cost, and are in danger of harm when forced to seek unregulated treatment. We face the same enemies, with right-wingers depicting GRS as mutilation and abortion as murder.

Unfortunately, some of those who are fighting for reproductive rights turn around and attack trans people with the same sort of attacks used against reproductive rights, undermining their message. With feminists such as Janice Raymond claiming that transsexuals should be "morally mandated out of existence," functionally saying "my body, my choice" and then turning around and telling trans people, "your body, my choice."

Transsexual people who want to medically transition should be trusted to make decisions about their own bodies. We should also fight for those who do not want to medically transition to be respected. Feminists and transsexual people are natural allies in the fight for access to medical treatment and make sure the motto "my body, my choice" applies to everyone.

Open Wide...

Virtual Book Tour: The Nearest Exit May Be Behind You

by Shaker Peggy Sue, a badass queer femme by day and badass roller derby queer femme by night and holy crap she loves this book.

S. Bear Bergman is an inveterate storyteller and award winning playwright. Zie is also the author of Butch is a Noun, a seminal work about butchness that should be mandatory reading for any and everyone interested in gender identity. It also "…makes butchness accessible to those who are new to the concept, and makes gender outlaws of all stripes feel as though they have come home—if home is a place where everyone understands you and approves of your haircut."

Bear's latest work is called The Nearest Exit May Be Behind You. Another compilation of deeply meaningful and personal essays, The Nearest Exit May Be Behind You tackles complex questions of gender, identity and the intersection of both with wit, gentle humor and pockets of great joy.

As a big fan of Shakesville (and an even bigger S. Bear Bergman fan), I'm delighted to offer up this interview where we talk about queerness, advice for cisgender people and capri pants.

Okay, let's get the identity part out there first. How do you identify?

These days, I mostly identify as overcommitted.

Not what you meant? Oh.

Relative to the topics of the book, I identify as butch, as transmasculine, and as queer. I also identify as Jewish (as a race, ethnicity, and religion), enabled/able-bodied, middle class, fat, and ballroom-dance lead.


Why?

Why does anyone identify as anything? Those are the things I am, or have come to understand myself to be, or how I wish to be seen in the world. They're also the labels I find most close to what I actually feel, or do. But I could go on for...well, for a while, describing exactly how some things work for me, or why, or what certain things mean to me, as I use them today.


Butch is a Noun was essays, as is The Nearest Exit May Be Behind You. Why essays?

I seem to do well in an essay format. I'm not a great fiction writer, except the occasional bit of smut, and I could probably do a cohesive book of nonfiction—memoir-style—but many of the things that eventually got into The Nearest Exit wouldn't have fit, because they're more academic. Plus memoir tends to be chronological, which I am not that great at. I think, at heart, I am an essayist (and like most essayists a bit of an egotist, since I clearly imagine that people will be interested in what I think about, oh, anything).


The title of Nearest Exit comes from an intense encounter with a seatmate on an airplane. Do you, as a queer and queerly gendered person, have suggestions for other queers on how to negotiate hostility from cis and/or non-queer people?

I'm not very good at it, is the problem. So I really hesitate to give advice. Usually what I do is act like kind of an ass, which doesn't seem to help anything. The best I am ever able to do, if we measure by the results, is "kill 'em with kindness" as my mother likes to say: I am so friendly, so helpful, so charming and so polite that they feel ashamed of themselves.


How about for cisgendered people when they have questions of people in the queer and/or trans community (or both)?

This is a very good question. It is a great question, because this is a thing that has been somewhat on my mind of late. I would like to suggest a few guidelines for straight people and/or cisgender people on the subject of When You Want To Learn More...

1. The best thing you can do is read. There are a lot of facts in books and on the internet, just waiting for you to learn them. There is no reason to start making your friends and acquaintances explain their lives to you when professionals have already covered the basics. Get all your facts from books or reputable websites.

1a. Don't complain that this is too much work. The nice people at PFLAG (pflag.org) have published reading lists, FAQs, whatever.

2. Once you've done your homework, then you can think about asking your queer or trans friends questions about what you've learned, and how they experience it. That is, don't ask them about what something means (Why is Pride always in June?) but do ask about their experiences of it (Do you remember your very first Pride March?).

3. Don't assume all the stories will be awful, and don't look shocked if someone queer or trans is really pretty much fine. Though I've had family struggles and personal issues and a variety of other things, my life now is actually totally great. Be prepared to sympathize, but also be prepared to celebrate.

4. Remember that not everyone's experience or vocabulary are the same. We're all individuals, we all come from and move through different experience. Don't assume that because you and I had a long, flirty, informative lunch that you now know everything about all transpeople. Likewise, don't map what you know about some other transperson on to me. For example, I am fine for people to /know/ my first name but it's never okay to call me that. For some transfolks, their old name is a source of real pain. For some, they don't change their names at all. Don't assume. Can I say that again? Don't assume.

5. Figure out if the question you're asking is appropriate to how well you know someone. Would you ask someone else you know this well about their genitals? No? Then don't ask me about mine. Would you ask someone else, similarly, about the mechanics of having their kid? No? Then don't ask a queer or trans person the same question.


You write a lot about how your gender is rarely questioned these days, in part because of your male partner. How is that different from your life before him? Have you encountered negative opinions from the queer community because you have a male partner?

My partner isn't male, he's a transman. The difference is that male is a sex, and man is a gender. So is transman, which is how my fantastic transsexual husband identifies himself.

There have been some complex reactions to the changes in my life since Butch Is A Noun. I'm pleased that many people seem to understand that my changes don't have anything to do with them, and that I am /not/ suggesting that they will change, or that they won't—as ever, I'm just reporting how things went for me.


In the book, you reference your Judaism. How has and does your Jewishness influence your queerness? And vice versa?

I go into that, at some length, in the book—it's a complex question, and one that usually takes at least two chapters or 30 minutes to answer. I think I have to say "Read the book!" for this one.


I find your wonderful manners absolutely captivating. Who in the world taught you all that?

My parents started me off and laid a very good foundation. I was always a very polite kid, even if I was also perhaps slightly argumentative. I learned a lot from them, and my grandparents, about manners. As a teenager, I was taken in hand by a cadre of high femmes and drag queens who tuned me up further, teaching me how to make myself the best possible foil and frame for them.

Also, I think, I have a natural bent toward performativity, and a lot of stage training. These things also make me more attuned to the people around me, more likely to perform a little or create a space in which someone I admire can perform a little. Plus, let's not kid ourselves: it's fun! It's a lot of fun.


You wrote "As a girl child, I was never asked to be seen and not heard." How did your family react to your butchness? Your trans-ness?

They've reacted in various ways, over time. There was kind of a long slow grinding battle on certain subjects, like whether I would shave my legs—and some of that shit lasted for, literally, a decade. It was not always easy. But my family is very....well, communicative, even if we "communicate" at the top of our lungs, and at the same time that someone else is also trying to "communicate". But we don't hold things in. We fight about them, we say judgmental things, we make each other feel bad, we feel bad that we made each other feel bad, we apologize and make up, and then we do it all again.

It's not exactly a streamlined process, but it works. And now we mostly do well—certainly, they love me and support me, certainly they adore my husband. Have we moved entirely beyond the snotty comments about my haircut? No. Then again, when does any Jewish mother stop commenting on her kids' hair and clothes? Maybe I need to stop assigning it all to my gender.


You wrote "Gender is an a la carte" arrangement. Can you explain what that means to you?

I mean that it seems to me we have an idea, culturally, that you identify a gender and then you have to, must, on your honor, do every single thing the culture associates with that gender and none of the things it does not. That's a load of rubbish, but it's well-supported by the media, especially, so we believe in it like it were the truth. It's perfectly okay to do and be whatever you want, however much it may be a mix of gendered attributes.

Not as many people do this as want to, I think, because society doesn't really like it. It's confusing, and so people get all weird about it. But it's possible to just pick exactly what you want. You do not have to have whatever someone else thinks comes with your main dish.

Did I just create a gender metaphor in which the genitals are the main dish? Let's just keep going, shall we?


Do you really wear capris? Really?

Well. I wear 3/4 length shorts, sometimes. Man-pris. With nice leather slides and a linen shirt. Cute for a fat guy.

No, really, it is. Wait, PSue, where are you going?

Open Wide...

Seen

In the large display in the front window of a Kenneth Cole* store in Chicago:

YOU PROMISED.

WE VOTED.

NOW DELIVER!


I just find it incredibly interesting that impatience with the President's performance is now a marketing gimmick.

(*I'm pretty sure it was Kenneth Cole; I was buzzing by on my scooter when I saw this, so I may be wrong.)

Open Wide...

Lieberman

He knows a terrorist when he sees one based on totally inappropriate speculation.

Open Wide...

Open Thread



Hosted by Atreyu and Falkor.

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime

Hawaii Five-0

Open Wide...

Open Thread



Hosted by The DeCastros.

Tiger Rag.mp3


Open Wide...

Happy Blogiversary...

...to our own Mustang Bobby, celebrating six years of barking and woofing.

...and to our slithery sister Echidne, also celebrating six years of hissing.

The blogosphere is a better place because you two are in it.

Open Wide...