In Which I Substitute an Email Exchange for an Actual Post

Between me and Melissa this afternoon:

MB: I'm all fired up hearing Ross Douthat and Pat Buchanan et al saying that in 2012, Sarah Palin's quitting will all be forgotten and she’ll be the rock star. They really think we’re all idiots.

MM: The scary thing is that they could be right. Because they know themselves well enough to know that, given the right circumstances, they'd happily turn her into a rock star. Sigh.

MB: Yeah, but instead of getting Bruce Springsteen, they’re giving us Milli Vanilli.

Open Wide...

Julie & Julia

I've been looking forward to Julie & Julia for quite some time—and not just because, as Iain put it this weekend while we looked over a list of the remaining movies to be released this year, "Our Excitement List is at zero." But I have to admit, the trailer is making me a little nervous:


Amy Adams fat? Even her face? "Risking [her] well-being" for the "deranged assignment" of cooking foods that must be eaten in small portions? (Do I hear a message that women can't possibly control themselves when rich food is put in front of them?)

I fear that I will like only half of this movie. I hope the marketing is just bad. *crosses fingers* I can't imagine that Nora Ephron would go to the trouble of making a movie about Julia Child and have its message be one of self-denial and self-loathing. Please Maude, no.

Open Wide...

Daily Kitteh

Sophs and her BFF Kenny Blogginz




"Purrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr."

Open Wide...

Fun with Site Meter


You are all in totally the right place, for quite possibly totally the wrong reasons, lol.

Previously in Fun with Site Meter: One, Two, Three, Four.

Open Wide...

What's Funny Here?

Audra Shay, vice chairwoman of the Young Republicans, finds racist slurs about the president LOL-worthy.

Shay posted something dumb about health care, on her Facebook, and one of her friends responded, as anyone would, with an angry string of slurs.
Two minutes later, Piker posted again saying "Obama Bin Lauden [sic] is the new terrorist… Muslim is on there side [sic]… need to take this country back from all of these mad coons… and illegals."

Eight minutes after that, at 2:02, Shay weighed in on Piker's comments: "You tell em Eric! lol."
Oops. Shay later backpedaled, claiming ignorance (heh), then quickly moved to de-friend her critics.

So, even if you buy her story about not knowing what she was laughing at (which I don't) what else is funny about the comment? Equating the president with a Bin Ladin and calling the president a terrorist? Othering Muslims? The swipe at "illegals"?

Open Wide...

Riots in China Leave Hundreds Dead

Wall Street Journal:

The death toll in riots in China's northwestern Xinjiang region rose sharply Monday, with state media saying that 156 people had been killed in what appears to be one of the deadliest episodes of unrest in China in decades.

Police said at least 828 other people were injured in violence that began Sunday in Urumqi, Xinjiang's capital. Witnesses said the conflicts pitted security forces against demonstrators, and members of the region's Turkic-speaking Uighur ethnic group against members of the country's Han Chinese majority. Many among the predominantly Muslim Uighurs have chafed at Chinese government rule.

...Uighur activists said hundreds of Uighurs, many of them students, had gathered Sunday to protest racial discrimination and call for government action against the perpetrators of an attack last month on Uighur migrant workers at a toy factory in southern China. In that incident, a group of Han Chinese broke into a factory dormitory housing Uighur workers. State media reported that two people were killed. Uighur groups say the death toll may have been higher.

The protests appear to have spun out of control late Sunday, with clashes between protestors and police as well as ethnic violence around the city.

...Uighurs have long complained about restrictions on their civil liberties and religious practices imposed by a Chinese government fearful of political dissent in strategically important Xinjiang, which covers one-sixth of China's territory and is also an important oil-and-gas-producing region.
Sounds a lot like last year's uprising in Tibet, which was also a result of heavy-handed Chinese government intervention in an ethnic minority region. (Also reminiscent of the 2007 uprising in Myanmar/Burma, which was the result of similar oppressions.) I am by no means an expert on this subject, so I leave it to those more informed to provide context and commentary in comments.

Open Wide...

Crazy Like a Fox

I've got a new piece up at The Guardian's CifA about Palin's recent resignation and the widespread contention that it's evidence she's crazy:

At some point – if all goes as planned and Palin finds herself a hot commodity on the rightwing small-time talk circuit, but nowhere else – she will discover that [Alaska is not a microcosm of America]. And, at that time, she will once again be faced with a steep learning curve, like and unlike the one she has diligently avoided, the one referenced last week by conservative commentator Charles Krauthammer on Fox News: "She is not a serious candidate for the presidency. She had to go home and study and spend a lot of time on issues in which she was not adept last year, and she hasn't."

Learning how to navigate the politics of the Lower 48, understanding how they are different from the quirky politics of Alaska, is like the take-home test of policy details she has cast aside in its magnitude, but unlike it in its potential appeal to Palin. She's not a wonk, has no interest in being one, and has quite possibly no talent for it – but she loves playing politics. Studying textbooks isn't her gig, but studying a new playbook is right up her alley.

And the shrewdest political players don't need textbooks. Bush was evidently a bumbling, fact-challenged doofus in 2000, and, in a 2004 presidential debate, played off ignorance about his own interest in a timber company with: "I own a timber company? That's news to me. Wanna buy some wood? Heh heh heh." He was also a two-term president.
Read the whole thing here.

Open Wide...

10 Reasons Why the BMI is Bogus

Just a little one* this time:

From NPR, the Top 10 Reasons the BMI is Bogus.

Yah. What They Said.

Signed,

The "Morbidly Obese" girl who plays midfield in soccer twice a week

* Liss reminded me, I don't have to get all blogorrheic just because there's white space on the monitor.

Open Wide...

Honduras coup turns lethal

Shaker Blank has been carefully updating me on the situation in Honduras (Blank is in Venezuela, and is an hispanophone, so has been providing insight into the non-governmental news sources).

President Zelaya tried to return to his country yesterday, but was prevented from landing by the army and police, occupying the airport and literally blocking the runway to prevent the aircraft from landing. It diverted to Nicaragua instead, where President Zelaya is meeting with several other regional leaders. The various international organizations - EU, OAS, and so on - have all denounced the coup, and insisted that the return to the rule of law be swift.

Unfortunately, the people who've gathered en masse to protest the army's seizure of power came into clashes with the army yesterday, and at least one was killed.

At Twice Immigrant, I've posted a link to the locations of Honduran consulates and embassies all over the world. I encourage you to take a moment to write an e-mail or a letter to your nearest Honduran diplomatic representative, urging them to calm the situation, and return power to the civil authorities. There are notes in the post about how to approach writing to diplomats, if you've never done it before.

A "government" slaying its own citizens in the name of democracy doesn't deserve to rule: "We had to destroy the village to save it" was nonsense then, and it's nonsense now.

Open Wide...

Pondering the HBO documentary Shouting Fire: Stories from the edge of Free Speech…

Crossposted from AngryBlackBitch.com.

Happy Monday, y’all!

Shall we?

This weekend I watched the HBO documentary Shouting Fire: Stories from the edge of Free Speech and it was beyond thought inspiring. As someone who writes an opinionated blog I’ve certainly experienced the backlash of speaking freely, but some of the stories were downright frightening! This doc is a must see regardless of your political inclinations…it goes beyond the usual “free speech is important” spin and delves into the reasons why we must protect the right to free speech, when and how those rights were defined and why even offensive speech needs to be protected.

Good stuff!

I thought about that shit for a spell and how it fits into our Independence Day celebration. It amazes me that folks can freak out and race to their local gun store on a rumor about gun control but they can’t be bothered to stand up to those who actively seek to take away their right to speak freely.

Sigh.

Anyhoo, Shouting Fire was a timely reminder about the powerful weapon of speech we each have…

…and why we need to protect the hell out of it.

Open Wide...

Monday Blogaround

This blogaround brought to you by Shaxco, makers of Benjamin H. Grumbles Brand Band-Aids, for dim-witted crumblebums and over-eager rapscallions who celebrated our glorious Day of Independence by burning their digits with an irresponsible use of pyrotechnic entertainments!

Recommended Reading:

Stargazer: 14th Down Under Feminists Carnival

Stephanie: Pay Discrimination in Hollywood, Who Knew?

Echidne: We Can Do It!

Angry Asian Man: The Stupidest Thing I've Ever Seen

Kevin: The Epic Struggle of Good Against Argentine Hotness

Sady: Shut Up, Cunt! The Cultural Logic of 97th-Wave Feminist Band Millionaires

mzbitca: Congrats, Serena

Leave your links in comments...

Open Wide...

Lose-Lose. As Per Usual.

Shaker Radelica sent me this article in the Boston Globe about a study done by researchers at West Point and Wisconsin-Milwaukee, British Columbia, Michigan, and Washington universities, who found that "white males got higher customer satisfaction ratings than women or people of color, whether they were doctors, university bookstore employees, or staffers at a golf course."

I don't know the details of the study, so I can't speak to its methodology or merits, but I did find a couple of things interesting. First, the article's focus on how Obama became president if the findings are true, as if one of the key features of any institutional bias is not exceptionalism. Secondly, this:

Co-author Karl Aquino, who is of Asian descent, said, "What's unsettling about our study is that when women and minorities perform better, they actually get lower performance ratings and are perceived more negatively. And we don't yet really know why. They even judged the overall environment [of the doctor's office, bookstore, or golf course] more negatively."
It's easy to have a bit of a giggle at "we don't yet really know why," since "endemic misogyny and racism" is such an obvious retort—but Aquino's asking a serious question about why it is that misogyny and racism specifically manifest in lower ratings for higher performance. Bias alone doesn't account for that in a readily discernible way, especially when many of the study's participants were women and/or POC reflecting internalized biases.

I suspect the answer lies within a particular aspect of privileging white maleness, which is treating it as "the norm." Our expectations are set by the way white (straight, cis) males do something (doctoring, retail service, caddying, etc.) just because examples of their doing it are ubiquitous. We thus tend to interpret a deviation from that established "norm" as a failure, even when it benefits us.

So if a woman provides a service in a different way—something that would not be remotely improbable, given the vast divergence in male and female socialization around servitude—most people will axiomatically interpret that as less than, because it defies their expectations. Even if they're ultimately served better.

Tangentially, we have expectations of how women and/or POC will behave in various roles, and if they are not sufficiently deferential—that is, if they behave exactly as a white male would in the same situation—most people will axiomatically interpret that as less than, because their expectations have been defied in a different way.

If you're paying attention, that means woman/POC (and, I would argue, identifiably queer men) cannot win. If they do things differently than white men because they are different than white men, they are judged negatively for being different. If they do things the same as white men despite being different than white men, they are judged negatively for not being different.

Lose-lose. Huzzah.

This, btw, is precisely why progressives must be willing to acknowledge differences among people without fear of implying innate inequities—"equal" does not have to mean "the same," nor should it—and why progressives must actively discourage judgment, both of which I've written about previously.

Open Wide...

RIP Robert McNamara

Former US Defense Secretary Robert McNamara has died at age 93.

Robert S. McNamara, perhaps the most influential defense secretary of the 20th century, who helped lead the nation into the maelstrom of Vietnam and spent the rest of his life wrestling with the war's moral consequences, died early Monday at his home in Washington, the Associated Press reported, citing his wife, Diana. He was 93, and according to the news agency, had been in failing health for some time.

Serving Presidents John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson from 1961 to 1968, Mr. McNamara oversaw hundreds of military missions, thousands of nuclear weapons and billions of dollars in military spending and foreign arms sales. He also enlarged the defense secretary's role, handling foreign diplomacy and the dispatch of troops to enforce civil rights in the South.
A complicated legacy, to say the least. McNamara was an unrivaled patriot and a strong supporter of civil rights; he also owned the Vietnam War, once saying he was "pleased to be identified with it," before changing his mind, profoundly and lastingly. He was haunted by the war for the rest of his life. He tried to make amends.
He concluded well before leaving the Pentagon that the war was futile, but he did not share that insight with the public until late in life.

In 1995, he took a stand against his own conduct of the war, confessing in a memoir that it was "wrong, terribly wrong." In return, he faced a firestorm of scorn.

...By then he wore the expression of a haunted man. He could be seen in the streets of Washington — stooped, his shirttail flapping in the wind — walking to and from his office a few blocks from the White House, wearing frayed running shoes and a thousand-yard stare.

He had spent decades thinking through the lessons of the war. The greatest of these was to know one's enemy — and to "empathize with him," as Mr. McNamara explained in Errol Morris's 2003 documentary, "The Fog of War: Eleven Lessons from the Life of Robert S. McNamara."

"We must try to put ourselves inside their skin and look at us through their eyes," he said. The American failure in Vietnam, he said, was seeing the enemy through the prism of the cold war, as a domino that would topple the nations of Asia if it fell.

In the film, Mr. McNamara described the American firebombing of Japan's cities in World War II. He had played a supporting role in those attacks, running statistical analysis for Gen. Curtis E. LeMay of the Army's Air Forces.

"We burned to death 100,000 Japanese civilians in Tokyo — men, women and children," Mr. McNamara recalled; some 900,000 Japanese civilians died in all. "LeMay said, 'If we'd lost the war, we'd all have been prosecuted as war criminals.' And I think he's right. He — and I'd say I — were behaving as war criminals."

"What makes it immoral if you lose and not immoral if you win?" he asked. He found the question impossible to answer.
A complicated man, from whose life there are lessons for all of us, I suspect. I strongly recommend The Fog of War, if you've not seen it.

RIP, Mr. McNamara.

Open Wide...

Bread and Teaspoons

Good morning (unless it isn't where you are), and welcome to a new feature at Shakesville: Bread and Teaspoons*. (Edit: this week only, feel free to comment with, well, y'know, comments. After that, we'll try and keep it to just directly-relevant comments.)

What's the idea, you're asking? Well, I'm gonna tell you. Consider this one as in honour of the US' Independence Day, in hopes of helping a few more Shakers achieve their own independence, from someone who grew up calling it "the American Rebellion". ;)

It occurred to me a couple of weeks ago that I'd noticed a number of Shakers mentioning that they were struggling to find work, to make ends meet, to keep the teaspoons full. And I bethought me, now Caitie, how could we find a way to make a difference in that? What resource can we put in reach of Shakers wanting to be in a place where they can spare a little to help others?

And the resource I hit on is: us. We're that resource. There are hundreds of us here, maybe thousands, all over the US and Canada, and out into the rest of the world. We work in all kinds of fields, doing all kinds of different things, and most of us tend to be online creatures: we roam the Toobz constantly, and in doing so, encounter many opportunities.

So my plan is to have a weekly post, Mondays, providing a spot for Shakers to network a little with one another, see if we can help each other out some.

Here's how it works: There should be two sorts of comments here.

1) You comment here with any details of work you're seeking: where, what, that sort of thing. You give an e-mail address at which you can be reached - feel free to set up a special e-mail for it, if you don't want to post your regular one for the world to spam - and if another Shaker has a lead, they can contact you directly to pass it along.

A work-seeking comment should include:

  • - a short summary of the skillset you're seeking work with;

  • - a short summary of your experience

  • - where you're looking for work to happen

  • - your contact e-mail
Please do NOT include information such as your full name or telephone number, as this is and will remain a public post, and once posted, there's no taking it back (because it'll be spidered by a search engine, not because we don't want you to).

For example, I might post a comment saying:

I'm a professional translator of French, German and Russian, with nearly 17 years of experience. I'm looking for basically any translation job, academic, commercial, personal, genealogical, you name it, with one exception: I do not currently have certification, so if you need a certified translator (usually for legal docs: birth certificates, divorce decrees, wills), you need someone else.

I am also available as a writer or editor, for academic, journalistic, creative, marketing-oriented or any other type of written communication. Basically, if you'll pay me, I'll write or edit it.

You can contact me for business purposes through my business address, translatey.caitie@translateycaitie.com.
**

2) The other type of comment could be task offering: if you've got a job you think might suit someone here, consider posting it as a comment. Use the same guidelines as above: give general information here, and specific information when you exchange e-mails. An offered task might look something like this:

I have a doctoral thesis which needs proofing and editing by Thursday, is anyone available? You can reach me at ABDShaker@shakesville.miskatonic.edu.

I'd like to be clear: only offer tasks which you have explicit permission to offer. If you come across something that isn't yours, but think some Shakers might want to know about it, either ask permission of the offerer, or offer it privately to someone whose comment says they might be interested (based on their skillset). For instance, you're on some other site, you see someone asking for, say, help in designing their new website. Don't come here and offer the job as a comment, unless you have that person's explicit permission. What you could do is go through the comments, and send an e-mail to anyone with the right skillset.

So, that's what we'd like to see.

What we do NOT want to see:
  • - recommendations/references, even for other Shakers - leave those for the contact phase of your negotiation

  • - rates info - again, leave this for the contact phase of your negotiation; we don't want to encourage bidding wars between Shakers

  • - illegal employment - whatever we may think of a given law against a certain activity, we don't want to put Shakesville in any awkward spots legally

  • - links to job search, agency or other sites - this is meant to be Shaker-to-Shaker, here, not a spamming point for other sites; only link to sites which are yours
So there. Have at it, Shakers, for Bread and Teaspoons!

Important disclaimers: Shakesville makes no endorsement or claim as to the capabilities of anyone commenting to this post, and anyone considering hiring someone should be prepared to treat it like any other business situation: DO YOUR DUE DILIGENCE. We're not doing any screening of this, so you'll want to make sure you check references, use safe-payment procedures (e.g., ask for a deposit), all the things you'd do when working with any stranger on the Internet. While this is intended for Shakers in general, remember that there is no real obstacle to being able to comment here, and do the things you need to do to keep yourself safe.

* As might be evident, this is an intentional reference to Bread and Roses, a longtime slogan of the left. In this case, though, my hope is that if we achieve steady bread, we will use it to power our teaspoon use.

** Now, don't go writing to that one yet, because that's not my actual domain name (which I've not got running yet, but should by tomorrow), and I'm only using it as an example (though it happens to be true). The e-mail listed for me under Contributors works just fine for now, if you've got something for me.

Open Wide...

In Movies You Should See: Away We Go


Maya Rudolph and John Krasinski in Away We Go
Directed by: Sam Mendes / Written by: Dave Eggers & Vendela Vida

Talking about what this movie isn't seems somehow more appropriate: It is not a Man-Child Makes Good film, although it is a little bit about growing up. It is not a pregnancy/baby film, although it is a little bit about expecting a baby. It is not a romantic comedy, although it is both romantic and funny, a lot of each. And it is not perfect, although it is very, very good.

John Krasinski is great. Maya Rudolph is extraordinary.

Open thread for those who have seen the film. Here be a SPOILER WARNING for the comments...

Open Wide...

What The Hell?



Shaker Liiiz (pictured far right)

What the hell is with that disapproving look on your face? What the hell are you trying to do, escape?? What the hell are they drinking??? What the hell????

[See also: Deeky, Liss, evilsciencechick, katecontinued, ClumsyKisses and Mistress Sparkletoes.]

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime

G-Force: Guardians of Space



For Iain.

Open Wide...

Radio Shakesville



A special edition of Radio Shakesville has been released from the vault and is now available for download. It can be had by visiting here or via iTunes here.

A complete list of songs used in this show is here.

Open Wide...

The Glorious Fourth

I first posted this here last year, and I thought it was worth repeating.

When I was a kid I was very outgoing in putting up displays for the holidays -- Memorial Day, Christmas, the Fourth of July -- I liked the flags, the lights, the stuff. It was cool to make a big splash. But as I grew up I grew out of it, and today I don't go much for things like that. I don't have a flag to fly on national holidays, and the most I'll do for Christmas is a wreath on the door because it has good memories and the scent of pine is rare in subtropical Florida.

I suppose it has something to do with my Quaker notions of shunning iconography -- outward symbols can't show how you truly feel about something on the inside, and more often than not they are used to make up for the lack of a true belief. This is also true of patriotism: waving the flag -- or wrapping yourself in it -- is a poor and false measure of how you truly feel about your country.

There's an old saying that there is nothing more powerful than an idea whose time has come. As Benjamin Franklin noted, no country had ever been formed because of an idea. But when the Continental Congress met in Philadelphia in 1776 and passed the resolution embodied in the Declaration of Independence, that was what was being done. To create a nation not based on geographical boundaries, property, tribalism, or religion, but on the idea of forming a new government to replace the present form because the rulers were incompetent, uncaring, and cruel. The American Revolution wasn't so much a rebellion as it was a cry for attention. Most of the Declaration is a punch-list, if you will, of grievances both petty and grand against the Crown, and once the revolution was over and the new government was formed, the Constitution contained many remedies to prevent the slights and injuries inflicted under colonialism: the Bill of Rights is a direct response to many of the complaints listed in the Declaration.

But the Declaration of Independence goes beyond complaints. Its preamble is a mission statement. It proclaims our goals and what we hope to achieve. No nation had ever done that before, and to this day we are still struggling to achieve life and liberty, and the pursuit of happiness goes on with no sign of let-up.

That is the true glory of America. Not that we complain -- and we do -- but that we work to fix those complaints. To put them right. To make things better than they were. To give hope to people who feel that they have no voice, and to assure that regardless of who they are, where they come from, what they look like, who they love, or what they believe, there will be room for them to grow, do, and become whatever it is that they have the capacity to be. It's a simple idea, but the simplest ideas often have the most powerful impact.

This nation has achieved many great things. We've inspired other nations and drawn millions to our shores not to just escape their own country but to participate in what we're doing. And we've made mistakes. We've blundered and fumbled and bullied and injured. We've treated some of our own citizens with contempt, and shown the same kind of disregard for the rights of others that we enumerated in our own Declaration of Independence. We have been guilty of arrogance and hypocrisy. But these are all human traits, and we are, after all, human. The goal of government is to rise above humanity, and the goal of humanity is to strive for perfection. So if we stumble on the road to that goal, it is only because we are moving forward.

I love this country not for what it is but for what it could be. In my own way I show my patriotism not by waving a flag from my front porch but by working to make things work in our system and by adding to the discussion that will bring forth ideas to improve our lives and call into question the ideas of others. It is all a part of what makes the simple idea of life, liberty, and that elusive happiness so compelling and so inspiring, and what makes me very proud to be a part of this grand experiment.

Go forth!

(Originally posted at Bark Bark Woof Woof on July 4, 2005.)

Open Wide...

The Virtual Pub Is Open



Happy Fookin' Fourth (Observed), Shakers!

Belly up to the bar, and name your poison!

Shaxco's Michael Bay Brand Super-Sparklers
(Now with Extra Sparks!)
are available for purchase behind the bar.

Open Wide...