Palin Resigns as Governor of Alaska

UPDATE: Moving this to the top of the page for a bit. New commentary below.

CNN: "Gov. Sarah Palin announced Friday that she will step down as Alaska's chief executive by the end of the month. She will not seek election to a second gubernatorial term in 2010."


[Transcript below.]

My quick and immediate thoughts: The framing here is laughable. First of all, not all second-term executives are lame ducks from the get-go. Many governors (and presidents) remain effective long into their second terms, so the idea that Palin is doing the people of Alaska some kind of favor by not serving a second term is merely an unflattering commentary on her own talents, dedication, and efficacy—not the courageous statement of a universal political truth, as she'd have us believe.

Secondly, not finishing her term isn't doing Alaskans any favors, either. It's merely a strategy to effectively create a Republican incumbent where there would be none if she finished our her term.

That this is a self-serving maneuver is manifestly obvious; she is departing her office in Alaska because she's too far away from the national stage where is where she wants to be ever since getting a taste as the veep candidate in the last election. She can't easily make herself available to give crappy speeches to anti-choicers in the heartland when she's immersed in the day-to-day of running Alaska in the hell-and-gone.

I understand her thinking, but the problem is that she needs to make herself more popular with the party leadership and conservative think-tankers, i.e. "In the aftermath of the November election, the conventional wisdom among Palin's supporters in the Republican establishment was that she should go home, keep her head down, show that she could govern effectively, and quietly educate herself about foreign and domestic policy with the help of a cadre of experienced advisers. She has done none of this."

At best, whatever she's got planned is likely to increase her popularity only among those with whom she's already popular. They're not enough to win an election.

Steve has more on this angle.
TRANSCRIPT: As I thought about this announcement, that I wouldn't run for re-election, and what that means for Alaska, I thought about, well, how much fun some governors have as lame ducks. They maybe travel around their state, travel to other states, maybe take their overseas international trade missions, so many politicians do that, and then I thought: That's what's wrong—many just accept that lame duck status, and they hit the road, they draw a paycheck, and they kinda milk it? And I'm not gonna put Alaskans through that.

I promised efficiencies and effectiveness. That's not how I'm wired. I'm not wired to operate under the same old politics as usual. I promised that four years ago, and I meant it. That's not what is best for Alaska at this time. I'm determined to take the right path for Alaska, even though it is unconventional, and it's not so comfortable.

With this announcement, that I'm not seeking re-election, I've determined it's best to transfer the authority of governor to Lieutenant Governor Parnell, and I am willing to do this, so that this administration, with its positive agenda and its accomplishments and its successful road to an incredible future for Alaska, so that it can continue, without interruption and with great administrative and legislative success.

My choice is to take a stand and effect change and not just hit our head against the wall and watch valuable state time and money, millions of your dollars, go down the drain in this new political environment. Rather, we know we can effect positive change outside government at this moment in time on another scale and actually make a difference for our priorities, and so we will, for Alaskans and for Americans.

Open Wide...

This May Well Be the Most Hilaritragic Thing I've Ever Seen

Pauly Shore, who I'm fairly certain found his way back from the wilds of oblivion by following the scent of this post, just showed up back in civilization in order to consult with an attorney about suing Sacha Baron Cohen for, I shit you not, allegedly stealing Shore's idea of adopting an African baby as a plot device. (No word on whether Shore will also be suing Madonna.)

In any case, this story was reported at, among other places, the gossip site In Case You Didn't Know, where the accompanying picture of Shore was emblazoned by a pop-up ad...


...for BrĂ¼no, featuring an image of the titular character holding, natch, his adopted African baby.

I'd almost feel sorry for Shore, almost, if he weren't, ya know, effectively arguing: "Hey! That totally racist joke was mine first!"

lolsob

If I hadn't already quit the world today, I would now.

Open Wide...

We Love Dreidels, We Swears It!

In the last few years, the rightwing Christian supremacist brigade, who used to refer (and often still do) to America as a "Christian" nation, has taken instead to referring to America as a "Judeo-Christian" nation and waxing nostalgic about its "Judeo-Christian" traditions. Partly that's a reflection of the rightwing's special interest in Israel, from the neocons' regard for it as an important Middle Eastern ally to conservative evangelicals' rapture-related fondness for the prophesied state of Jesus' return—but mostly it's just a cynical attempt to mask their naked bigotry behind the illusion of (limited) tolerance.

Rarely, however, is the utter speciousness of its use laid as hilariously bare as in this ridiculous op-ed in the Freeport, IL Journal-Standard, in which the Rev. Patrick Vandenburgh calls for "a Christian Revolutionary War."

It is time for a new Christian revolutionary war. It is time for Christians all over the United States to stand up for our Judeo-Christian heritage.
Really? Just the Christians? Not the Jews, lol?

Once the good reverend really outlines what he wants, it's pretty clear why the Jews might not be interested:
The true church of Jesus Christ must arise in this desperate hour and storm heaven with our prayers. We must not relent until our Christian heritage is established again in every aspect of society.
Even the Jewish aspects! In fact, especially those!
We are and will always be a Christian nation that serves Jesus Christ and His kingdom.
So…what, then, does that "Judeo" part in "our Judeo-Christian heritage" actually cover?

Oh, right. Your ass.

Against charges of intolerance, exclusion, and prejudice in front of coffers-filling followers too stupid or scared to look too closely at what they're really supporting, or too shameless to care.

[H/T to Caitie.]

Open Wide...

No terrorism here, nope, just us Republicans

ETA: There's a good analysis of a similar topic at City of Ladies from a few weeks back.

A lot changed on September 11, 2001. It is, I think, fair to wonder, in the idle speculation sense, whether the world would be a different place if the President of the US had been a different person, but that's not where I'm going today.

After 9/11, Bush and his handlers walked a very strange line, twisting in and out of the truth like a...well, like a very twisty thing.

They had two competing goals, and meeting them both meant a balancing act. Goal one was to keep America well-terrified: cue the Department of Homeland Security and their endless threat-level colour code porn. "What goes with orange? Why couldn't they pick something a little easier to coordinate with?" I don't know who said that, but someone ought to have.

Anyway, goal two was the seemingly opposite task of making America feel safe - but not too safe. So, he made numerous pronouncements about how there'd been no domestic terrorist incidents since 9/11 - but claimed that they'd been prevented by his sheer devotion to iron-willed security.

Uh-huh.

I invite you to remember the joke about the person walking along the street making strange gestures and shouting randomly. When asked why, the answer is, "To keep the tigers away." When it is pointed out that there aren't any tigers in this area, the person looks satisfied, and carries on performing their random preventatives.

The narrative was, and is to this day, that terrorism is solely an external threat, and that racial profiling is a sensible response to this "threat"; the focus on xenophobic reactions and practices has become a set pattern of the DHS and the various wingnut factions, and has resulted in nonsensical situations, such as the people on the "no-fly" list who are nevertheless able to easily purchase firearms, and the discommodation of and prejudice against innocent legal residents of the US who have the nerve to live there while brown (and I'm not even touching the whole "people can be illegal" meme that's grown out of this, though it's important to remember).

But what if it turned out that the greatest threat to peace and order in the US wasn't external terrorists - there's no credible contention that any foreigner has made a serious attempt to attack the US in the last eight years - but the homegrown kind?

Let's take a moment to find out what terrorism is, shall we? This definition comes from a source with some relevance to the discussion: (From U.S. Code Title 22, Ch.38, Para. 2656f(d))


(d) Definitions
As used in this section—
(1) the term “international terrorism” means terrorism involving citizens or the territory of more than 1 country;
(2) the term “terrorism” means premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by subnational groups or clandestine agents;
(3) the term “terrorist group” means any group, or which has significant subgroups which practice, international terrorism;
Note definition (2), which allows for the possibility that terrorists might be Americans: "premeditated, politically-motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets..."

What I've been leading up to is this list from the Southern Poverty Law Centre. 75 terrorist incidents, each one planned or perpetrated by Americans against Americans.

And before you start saying, well, hey, that means Bush's random dances and pronouncements were working, note the date split. 40 of the incidents happened in the six years before 9/11; 35 in the eight years since. 16 Americans were killed before 9/11 in these attacks; 11 more have died since. Whee, what a great improvement - instead of 3 Americans a year killed by terrorists domestically, it's dropped all the way to 1.3 per annum. Well, I guess those billions were well-spent, then, huh?

Now, what's the key factor linking all of these plots, attacks and conspiracies together? Can anyone spot it? That's right! They're all right-wing extremists, frequently racist, and in each case, they were trying to achieve political goals through violence and terror attacks against noncombatants. If only we had a handy name for this kind of thing!

That is to say, just about the only people committing terrorist attacks against Americans inside the US these days? They're almost all white. They're right wing. They're anti-immigrant, racist, religious zealots, often homophobes as well.

I eagerly await the response of conservatives to this: I'm sure we'll get some more twisted logic about how everybody but them are really the threat.

But the face of terrorism in America doesn't have brown skin, and it doesn't speak Arabic, and it isn't a Muslim face. By far the majority of attacks are plotted and/or carried out by straight white Christian men.

So tell me...who should we be profiling again?

Open Wide...

Daily Kitteh...with Wrinkly Puppeh!


Top Cats: Emily and Sybil


Old Man Twister


The Inimitable Van

Open Wide...

Friday Blogaround

This blogaround brought to you by Shaxco, makers of Michael Bay Brand Super-Sparklers, now with extra sparks.

Recommended Reading:

Meowser: OK, D00d Nation, THIS Is What I Want From You

Kevin: Nuns Gone Wild!

Renee: The Convenience of "Super Crip"

Clio Bluestocking: Abolition as a Self-Help Movement

Lauredhel: Whitewashed!

Tracey: When "Sexism" is a Dirty Word

Shayera: Part of the Reason Murdoch's Minions are Whining So Much about Franken's Win

Leave your links in comments...

Open Wide...

I'm Shocked, I Tell You. SHOCKED!

Cheney orchestrated public response to Plame leak:

A document filed in federal court this week by the Justice Department offers new evidence that former vice president Richard B. Cheney helped steer the Bush administration's public response to the disclosure of Valerie Plame Wilson's employment by the CIA and that he was at the center of many related administration deliberations.

...A list of at least seven related conversations involving Cheney appears in a new court filing approved by Obama appointees at the Justice Department.
And here's more SHOCKING news: Former Bush administration officials assert that the contents must remain secret, and—surprise!—the Obama administration agrees! Hopey changey!
In the filing, the officials argue that the substance of what Cheney told special prosecutor Patrick J. Fitzgerald in 2004 must remain secret.

No such agreement was reached between Fitzgerald and Cheney at the time of their chat, according to a 2008 Fitzgerald letter to lawmakers. But the Bush administration rejected requests by Congress and a nonprofit group for access to two FBI accounts of the conversation, saying the material was exempt from disclosure under subpoena or the Freedom of Information Act.

The Obama administration has since agreed that the material should not be disclosed. A Justice Department lawyer at one point last month argued that vice presidents and other White House officials will decline to be interviewed in the future if they know their remarks might "get on 'The Daily Show' " or be used as fodder for political enemies.
Exactly. How can someone who wants to be a leader of the free world be expected to withstand being teased by Jon Stewart?! Oh, the HUMANITY!

I officially quit the world.

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime

Lidsville


Please note: Since today is Fourth of July (recognized) in the US, posting will be light today.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Given the below post... What's your favorite movie featuring dancing?

This could mean a musical, or it could be a movie whose central theme is dance, like Girls Just Want to Have Fun or Stomp the Yard.

Open Wide...

Girls Just Want to Have Fun: Dance TV Dance-Off

For Shaker Xerophyte.

Open Wide...

Welcome to "The Ledge"

This week in Chicago, the Sears Tower opened a series of glass balconies suspended 1,353 feet in the air and hovering four feet out from the 103rd floor Skydeck. I can't wait to go visit these stinking things! I'm even willing to sit through the required "Blah Blah Chicago Blah" movie to which visitors are subjected before hitting the Skydeck for 'em.

If you're scared of heights, I sincerely recommend against watching the below video, because you might actually throw up your spleen or shit out your lower intestine. But, if you're like me, and heights give you a heady rush of vertigo that's equal parts thrilling and terrifying, this video is like a drug:


Iain nearly faints when we go to the Signature Lounge at the Hancock Building and I lean my head against the glass and look straight down to give myself a delicious case of the woozies. I couldn't get him into one of these things for love nor money, and I'm pretty sure he wouldn't even be able to watch me get in one without puking or passing out.

Open Wide...

Daily Kitteh



Livsy, Queen of All She Surveys

Open Wide...

Quote of the Day

"No one noted all the white chicks covering Laura Bush."Washington Post reporter Robin Givhan, a Pulitzer Prize-winning writer and African-American woman, to Howard Kurtz, who, despite noting in his piece that "no one raises questions when an Irish American male reporter covers a pol named Murphy," nonetheless wonders: "Are [African-American female] reporters inadvertently invested in [Michelle Obama's] success?"

Without a trace of irony.

Open Wide...

Feel the Homomentum!

The Mo Train stops in Allegheny County, PA:

Twenty years after its county seat of Pittsburgh passed a similar law, Allegheny County is banning discrimination in employment and housing based on sexual orientation.

The Allegheny County Council passed such a bill by a vote of 8-6 on Wednesday night. County Executive Dan Onorato says he will sign it.

The bill contains an exemption for fraternal, religious, charitable and sectarian organizations.
Of course it does.

[H/T to Andy.]

Open Wide...

Today In Bad Ideas



Old Yeller Dog Food

Old Yeller, as you may recall, is a film that ends, quite memorably (in fact, it's arguably the one thing everyone knows about the movie), with the titular canine going rabid and being gunned down by his weeping lad of an owner. And this is supposed to sell pet food how?

Open Wide...

In Thanks for Those Who Get It

by Shaker Ali_K

As progressives and progressives in training, we see a lot of shit in the world that most people seem to be blind to. It can be incredibly frustrating, but every so often we happen across someone who just gets it. Maybe it's someone we don't expect to get it, maybe it's someone who consistently (or almost consistently) gets it but it's still refreshing to see every time (the Shakesville crew, Sarah Haskins, Jay Smooth, etc.), maybe it's someone who gets it even when we don't, maybe it's someone we just hope gets it but we dare not hope too much for fear of disappointment. Whatever the case may be, when someone does get it, it's as if the angels sing and kittens frolic in rainbows. It's beautiful.

So thank you to those who get it. Thank you to the (small town in a conservative state) jury in my attempted rape trial who heard my testimony and then asked if the defendant was charged with attempted murder also, and if not then why the hell not?* Thank you to the judge in that same trial who sentenced my attempted rapist to 80 years, for me and for the women and girls who came before me. Thank you to the friends who actively booed the sexist commercials during out last Super Bowl watching party. Thank you to the league organizers who took seriously our complaints about the sexist comments coming from another team. Thank you for getting it.

What about you, Shakers—what examples of getting it have you seen recently?

-----------------------------

* OK so I might be paraphrasing a bit.

Open Wide...

Gay Camp Pendleton Sailor Found Dead in Suspected Homicide

Blub:

A person was being held in connection with the suspected homicide of a 29-year-old sailor who was found in a Camp Pendleton guard shack, Navy officials said yesterday.

The body of Seaman August Provost of Houston was discovered about 3:30 a.m. Tuesday on the western edge of the base, said Doug Sayers, a spokesman for Navy Region Southwest. An autopsy was completed yesterday, but authorities were waiting for results of toxicology tests to determine the cause of death. A "person of interest" was being held in the brig at Miramar Marine Corps Air Station. No charges have been filed.

The death has local gay activists calling for an investigation into whether Provost was slain because of his sexual orientation. "We're definitely monitoring this, and trust and hope the military will investigate this in the professional way it should," said Nicole Murray-Ramirez, chairman of San Diego's Human Rights Commission.

…Provost's partner, Kaether Cordero, said Provost was openly gay but kept his private life quiet for the most part. "People who he was friends with, I knew that they knew," Cordero said from Houston. "He didn't care that they knew. He trusted them."

Provost had recently complained to family members about a person who was harassing him, so they advised him to tell his supervisor, said his sister, Akalia Provost of Houston.
What breaks my heart even beyond the loss of Provost's life is that, if it turns out that he was killed because he was gay, there will be people who cite his death as justification to retain the DADT policy.

The reality, of course, is that the forced association between being gay and secrecy, shame, and silence, the suggestion that being gay is something so bad that it should and must be hidden, created by DADT is precisely what feeds the dangerous homophobia that leads to the mistrust and harassment and harm of gay soldiers. If anything, Provost's death, if indeed a hate crime, argues for DADT's repeal, cries plaintively for a policy that does not tacitly encourage suspicion, contempt, violent hatred of the Other.

RIP Seaman August Provost.

Open Wide...

Jeb 2012

Jeb Bush (the less dignified of the two in the photo; wrap your head around that) may be testing the waters for a 2012 presidential bid.

Maude help us all.

Recent robocalls to Iowa asked potential voters which of the following they'd most likely vote for: Huckabee, Palin, Gingrich, Jindal, or Jeb Bush. As if two previous Bushes weren't enough already.

(And note the decided lack of Romney or Liss' boyfriend Fred Thompson.)

The survey also asked "Which one of the following phrases best describes President Obama? For good leader, press 1; for good President, press 2; for too party-centric, press 3; for too liberal, press 4; for Socialist, press 5; for bad President, press 6; for undecided, press 7." (Emphasis mine.)

Good luck, America, you're gonna need it!

Open Wide...

News from Shakes Manor

Last night, while KennyBlogginz, Iain, and I were hanging out watching Dance TV*, we saw an advert for BrĂ¼no, which naturally prompted me to groan and splutter and rant about how filled with loathing I was for it.

Liss: ARGH! I hate everything having to do with this film! Fucking BrĂ¼no!

KBlogz: Looks like you're quite the homophobe over there.

[Iain and I burst out laughing.]

Iain: She hates Borat, too.

KBlogz: You hate Kazakhs, you hate gay people… I can't wait to see what kind of character Sacha Baron Cohen does next so we can see who else you hate.

-----------------------------

* Yes, that's a real live Girls Just Want to Have Fun allusion!

Open Wide...

Movies You Can't Netflix: Mac and Me

(Earlier today Liss and I were discussing Mac and Me (don't ask) and I told her the blog would be greatly improved (or damaged, whichever) by more material relating to the 1988 film. Truthfully, you can actually Netflix this one, but I wouldn't recommend it, as its reputation as one of the worst films ever made is well deserved. Enjoy!)

It doesn't surprise me someone ripped off E.T. What is surprising however is that someone did it more than five years later. What resulted was not a cute, little homage to the original, but instead is one of the more crass and vulgar films out there: A ninety-five minute spectacle of commercialism disguised as family entertainment. This is a film where Coca Cola saves the day and McDonalds is really the happiest place on Earth.

There is rarely a scene that doesn't have some sort of obtrusive product placement. Whether it's Otter Pops or Skittles, the film is constantly shilling, and this becomes not so much a movie as an hour and a half long commercial.

The plot, such as it is, really is little more than a cheap knockoff of E.T. with only a few minor points changed here and there. A family of aliens gets stranded on Earth, and the youngest, nicknamed Mac, gets separated from his brood. While attempting to reunite with them, and avoid capture by government agents, he takes up with a suburban family.

There is a slight variation in that instead of a bicycle Eric (Jade Calegory), the kid the alien hooks up with, has a wheelchair. Otherwise things are pretty dead on with E.T. Even the music rips off John Williams' original score. The only significant difference is that perhaps they made the aliens even uglier than E.T., if that is at all possible.

Mac lives entirely on Coca Cola, by the way. I guess they don't have cavities or diabetes where he comes from. Actually, everyone in the film seems to live on Coca Cola. Anyway, when the Feds finally figure out where Mac is hiding things get really exciting. And by exciting, I mean "optimized for maximum product exposure."

In order to outwit the Feds Eric disguises Mac as an animatronic teddy bear and heads to McDonalds. There is quite a party going on, as it is someone's birthday, no one in the cast, mind you, but someone is having a party. Ronald McDonald is there (played by himself, according to the end credits), as are a bunch of dancing gay football players (fuck if I know). And let me tell you, you ain't lived until you've seen a dance number set in a fast food joint.

The Feds descend upon McDonalds, carrying a large cage, but Eric and Mac slip out the side door. Then the chase is on with the kid and the alien being pursued by government agents, just like in E.T., but this time they're in a wheelchair instead of on a bike. Eric seeks refuge in Sears, because that is where Mom (Christine Ebersole) works. There are plenty of crazy antics among the Tuffskins™ and Craftsman™ tools, as Eric deftly outmaneuvers his pursuers.

Eric and Mac then ditch the Feds by jumping into the family minivan. Eric, his brother (Jonathan Ward), his brother's girlfriend (who spends the entire film in her McDonalds uniform, by the way), the cute (i.e. annoying) neighbor child, and the alien head off into the desert searching for Mac's family. It turns out they're hiding in a mine shaft behind a billboard for Wickes Furniture Stores.

The aliens are near death, as the time in the desert has left them at the brink of dehydration. Part of the problem is, on their home planet, which I think is a moon of Saturn, the aliens drink by sticking straws in the sand and sucking out water. Unfortunately, in the California desert, if you stick your straw in the sand and suck all you get is sand. But Eric has brought along enough Coca Cola to revive them. A six pack of soda later and they've all made a full recovery.

Do the aliens then make it back home? Hell no. The film ends with them being sworn in as U.S. citizens, all thanks to Coca Cola, McDonalds, and the other fine products prominently displayed in the course of the film.

Hooray for American consumerism!

Open Wide...