Happy Birthday, Todd!



Happy Birthday to youuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu!
Happy Birthday to youuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu!
You're my BFF and I LYLAS and I hope you
always stay sweet and never chaaaaaaange!
Happy Birthday to youuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu!


Below begins one of my favorite posts about Todd—infrequent Shakesville contributor, big brother to Kenny Blogginz, co-recipient of the infamous Mozcake, and one of my oldest and best friends, who has made my life immeasurably better in countless ways. I love you, doll. Happy Birthday!

Below begins one of my favorite posts about Todd (with appropriate updates to reflect that we're even older now)...

<-------- (Oy. I don't know what's worse. Todd's glasses or my eyebrows. Damn, let's call that shit a draw!)

It's not technically true that I met Todd just before my 16th birthday; we had been in the same places at the same time since we were toddlers, attended the same elementary and middle schools, and always had a vague notion of who the other was. But it was just before my 16th birthday that we became friends, finding in each other the geekishly like-minded misfits our respective lives were missing, and promptly becoming so inseparable that his younger brother, only a baby then and now about to bid his teenage years adieu, referred to us as one person when he learned to speak: "Where ToddMelissa?" I've just turned 35, and more half my life has been spent with Todd as my confidant, conspirator, and comrade. I've spent more time on this earth with him as my friend than I did without him, and my life is infinitely better for it.

Some of the 19 (!) years Todd and I have spent as friends were spent as roommates, some as co-workers, some as conspirators on various doomed projects, like half-assedly forming a band called Nolte or authoring a terrible screenplay about a character named Orlando Florida. Importantly, they spanned the years during which we navigated the uneven path toward adulthood—a path along which I got raped, he came out, I got married and divorced young, he did the same (sans the legal component, which he is denied), I got PTSD, he got kidney stones, and lots of other unfun stuff. Navigating it together made it infinitely easier, because Todd is the kind of friend that everyone should be fortunate enough to have. He has seen me at my absolute worst—embarrassing, shameful stuff; he has known me to be stubborn, hurtful, uncompromising, inconsiderate, irrational. He has known me to lie. Some of it was directed at him. Some of it caused huge fights. And he has, graciously, forgiven me every time, because he made our friendship worth earning his forgiveness.

He has also seen me at my best, which, in the weird way of the criminally shy, is sometimes even harder for me to fully share than my worst. But he knows my heart truly, in the way few people do—and though there's a certain sentimentality to that which needs no exposition, it also provides for our ability to have egregious amounts of a particular variety of fun that only two very old, very close friends can have. The kind of fun that leaves one collapsed in a heap of gut-wrenching giggles, gasping for air and swearing one shall never recover.

* * *

I have rarely laughed as hard as I did on the morning I found myself, quite literally, having fallen onto the pavement in a Grand Avenue parking lot after my knees buckled from the weight of laughter. It was my first job out of college, and I'd been there a year when Todd graduated and I managed to finagle him a job at the same place. Every morning, he'd pick me up, and every morning, I'd inform him of the goings-on by a wee spider that had made its home in the cavity of the passenger side mirror. Every morning, he'd get increasingly pissed about this spider who would retreat behind the mirror if he tried to capture and relocate it to a hedge or the Great Beyond.

On this morning, the spider had spun a huge web, stretching from the mirror to the angled side of the windshield, and as we drove down Lake Shore Drive, Todd sped up, trying to take out the web with sheer velocity. It bounced and blew, but did not fall. The spider rode safe in the mirror cavity he called home. Todd swore and screamed at the web as we hit 60mph. "What the fuck?! Why won't it go away?! I'm so fucking sick of this spider!"

He was genuinely angry, and I was stifling the need to laugh. A lot.

When we pulled into the parking lot, the web was still intact, and the spider had come out to stretch in the sunshine. Todd ran around to side of the car, determined to kill this thing once and for all. Just as the beast was nearly within his reach, it scurried away again behind the mirror. "Ahhrrrgghh!" he exclaimed. I burst out laughing. He went to work flailing his arms, destroying the web like a demonic windmill. Tears began to roll from my eyes. And then the yelling began.

"The mirror is NOT a haunted mansion!" he informed the spider, his face growing red. "You have 24 hours to evacuate, or I'm GETTING THE BUG SPRAY!"

"Wahhhhhhhhhhhhh!" I cried. "Bwah ha ha ha ha ha!" I fell against the car, then slid down onto the ground, my entire body convulsed with laughter.

"It's not funny!" he scolded me angrily. "My car is not a home for deadbeat bugs!"

He scowled at me. I started to drool as I gasped for air.

"Whatever," he harrumphed, then stood with his hands on his hips, contemptuously watching me quiver on the pavement, until he began to grin.

* * *

We have made silly movies together, vacationed together, attended innumerable concerts together, met Mozza together, partied together (our birthdays being only nine days apart, we have shared quite a few birthday celebrations), done drugs together, seen thousands of films together, spent nights talking until dawn, and I have invaluable, precious memories from all of these things. When I cast my mind backwards over 19 years in search of fond memories, I most remember the times we have been have left in an absolute fit of laughter.

And sometimes I remember the times when it's been just me left in an absolute fit of laughter, because Todd has done one of things that earned him the alter-ego handle of Mr. Furious.

Todd truly goes from calm (or the low-level simmering awaiting deployment into wanton fury that passes for calm in his emotional make-up) to OUTRAGEOUSLY FUCKING PISSED in the blink of an eye. It's usually about some little thing—he doesn't blow his gasket about The Big Stuff in remotely the same way—and it's a burst of fury that lasts only a moment and quickly subsides. And, um, I find it hilarious.

I can't help it.

If you were there, you'd find it hilarious, too.

Especially when he's mad at his food. I mean, when someone picks up a mozzarella stick he's just been served, and half of it collapses from his hand like a pile of snotty goo, and then he throws the rest to the plate, declaring, "These aren't mozzarella sticks—these are BULLSHIT sticks!!!" that's funny. Even if he is genuinely mad.

Maybe even more so because he's genuinely mad.

I swear I thought I would never recover the morning of the bad-tasting burrito. I had just graduated college, Todd was still finishing, and we were living in an apartment on Albion Street on the north side of Chicago that had a Pepto-Bismol pink bathtub and toilet. It was Saturday morning, and I was sitting on the sofa in the living room eating cereal and watching cartoons. Todd stumbled through the living room in the ubiquitous baby-blue robe he'd had since I met him, mmph-ing a good morning to me as he passed into the kitchen.

I heard some banging, the microwave working, dinging. A few moments later, Todd joined me at the other end of the sofa, balancing on his knees a plate topped by a just-heated frozen burrito. Breakfast of champions.

He took a bite, made a terrible guttural noise. "Blurrrgh!" I looked over to see him deliver a short, jabbing punch to the burrito. Its contents squirted from both ends. "FUCK YOU AND YOUR BAD TASTE!" he yelled at it, then stormed back into the kitchen, where I could just hear the sound of a fork urgently scraping a plate over the garbage can above the din of my own howling laughter.

* * *

I am quick to laugh, and I have a loud laugh that carries and causes me to blush in restaurants when I realize it's made people stare. Todd isn't quick to burst out laughing himself, and he's more likely to shoot off a single "Ha!" in response to something he finds funny. But there have been occasions we have both laughed until we cried, totally ending ourselves. This was one of these times, the very thought of which nearly ends me to this day, more than a decade later...

Todd was a film/communications major; I was a sociology and anthropology major, so we rarely had classes together. In my fourth year and his third, I was facing a sociological theory course which not only sounded tedious, but was taught by a single professor, who had a hideous reputation. (A professor we'll call Dr. Dandruff, for what I'll assume are obvious reasons.) I convinced Todd to take it with me, as one of his electives, to his chagrin and my relief, as Dr. Dandruff turned out to be worse than I had ever imagined, having the unique capacity to be both mind-numbingly boring and detestably irritating at the same time, a loathsome demeanor made further unfortunate by his near-total lack of personal hygiene. He had the annoying habit of punctuating his lectures with questions that should have been rhetorical—"What is the difference between a billiard ball and a human?"—but would bring the class to a silent standstill as he waited for an answer. ("I'd be pissed if someone hit me with a stick," I finally muttered from the back of the class.)

Suffice it to say, Todd and I were not fond of this class. We sat in the back of the room, our heads knocking against the cinderblock wall, writing each other notes back and forth about boys we liked and what we'd do this weekend. It was the easiest way to pass the time, which seemed to drag on endlessly until the bell finally rang—we were in the only building on campus that still had "bells" like a high school to indicate time was up.

During a particularly dreadful session one day, Todd nudged me with his elbow. I shook off my stupor and looked down at his notebook, which he was holding out for me to see. He had drawn a picture of Dr. Dandruff, with his entire body replaced by a giant ass, and two dialogue bubbles, which read: "Well, I'll be damned! I've got a butt for a body!"

It looked, approximately, like this:


I thought this was perhaps the most hilarious thing upon which I had ever laid eyes.

But in the perfect stillness of the classroom, broken only so slightly by the monotonous drone of Dr. Dandruff's lecture, I could not burst out laughing.

I looked away, squeezing my eyes shut, tensing my lips, trying, in effect, to turn my face into a clenched fist to hold in the laugh trying so desperately to escape. I could feel my face burning red.

Todd nudged me.

I ignored him.

He nudged me again.

I looked.


And then it happened—the laugh I was trying so urgently to withhold began to make its getaway. It slipped out of me like air someone is trying to hold in a balloon with a pinch; a high-pitched squeal: "Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!" My gut lurched upwards, and as I held it back, the screech got louder and louder. "Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!"

Beside me, Todd silently began to shake.

The other students started to look around, to see from whence the strange noise came, focusing on the two red-faced gits in the back, their eyes bursting with tears.

"Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!"

"What's that noise?" Dr. Dandruff asked.

And then it came. "Bwah ha ha ha ha ha!" Both of us. Howling.

The entire class stared at us in slack-jawed wonder as we screamed, pounding the desks with our fists and collapsing against each other weakly. And on and on we laughed until the bell finally rang.

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime

Twin Peaks



For Todd, because it's HIS BIRTHDAY!!!

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Well, obviously, we all really like children's book questions! I think we may have done this before, but it's been a while if we did, so:

What's a "lesson" you learned from a book as a child that stays with you to this day?

This can be either a "good" lesson that you still live by, or perhaps something you read that made you say "what a load of bullshit!" Either way, what did you take away from your fancy book learnin'?

Harriet the Spy taught me to be adventurous in my learning and observation, to find beauty in the everyday, and to own up and apologize when I've made a horrible mess of things. She taught me that friendships, when broken, can be repaired.

She also taught me not to hate tomatoes.

Open Wide...

Context

Liss and I were chatting earlier and during the conversation I lamented the fact that a very dear friend of mine was in a bad spot. There was next to nothing I could do about the situation and I said I felt like an asshole because of it. Liss told me I wasn't an asshole, as the situation was not my fault, and the responsible party was, in fact, the true asshole here.

But I explained "A lot of my self-worth is tied into me helping everyone else around me, usually at the expense of my own health and happiness."

"You're such a girl," she replied. It was not said the way most people say it, even as it played on how they do.

"You know what's funny?" I asked her. "Well, not funny so much as sad. But in most contexts 'you're such a girl' would be an insult. But here it makes me reply: Awesome. Totally awesome."

Liss sent back: "Btw, feeling like an asshole for wanting to help people makes you an asshole. Not a real asshole. The kind of asshole I always call you. And if your self-worth is tied into helping people around you, then you should basically spend your life feeling like a million goddamn dollars, considering you help me get through the day every day just by being you."

Open Wide...

Quotes of the Day

"Aww, trust me. Not me Baby! Nuh-uh. Not happening. No way, no how!"—RNC Chair Michael Steele on whether he would resign his position, March 5, 2009.

"They can contemplate [new restrictions on appropriations] all they want to, but the reality is if they want a figurehead chairman you can have a figurehead chairman, but it won't be Michael Steele."—RNC Chair Michael Steele on whether he would resign his position, May 19, 2009.

Anyone want to start a pool on how much longer this guy's got at the helm...? I call six weeks.

Open Wide...

Why We Must Investigate Torture

Part of the reason that I haven’t been blogging is that I’ve felt a bit soul-sick lately.

I know that this is almost certainly not the first time that my government has actually tortured people. It is, however, the first time that my government has done so publicly, accompanied it with brazen justifications – and not a damn thing has been done about it.

I’ve been kind of stunned since it began (seven fucking years ago!), to be perfectly honest. I’ve felt helpless and hopeless at points. It has triggered a lot of things in me (as a survivor of torture), and I’ve wrestled with how to take action in a manner that is not “fighting” anything (I’m a firm believer that “Fighting for Peace is like Fucking for Virginity”).

Oh sure -- I sent letters to my congress-critters way back when -- I had hopes that the new administration would actually do something -- but I’ve come to a point now where I simply cannot refrain from moving into determined and sustained action on this issue. I must know that I have done all that I can to help create the world I want to live in.

So, this post is my first step. It presents the reasons I believe that we absolutely must investigate, and an invitation -- because I want you to join me (action item at the bottom of the post).

As a citizen of the United States, I consider myself a “cell” in the body of this nation – a nation that I believe is very ill at this point. If I am to help my nation heal, I have to become an active agent in its healing. So, here are (some of) the reasons I believe that we must investigate Torture:

Reason #1 – Because There is a Festering Wound in My Nation’s Heart

The argument that we should just “move on” and “look forward”, ignoring the human rights violations of the Bush administration, would be fine and dandy – if it had ever actually worked.

Think about your own life. Have you ever really been able to just "move on" from an act of intentional harm that you perpetrated -- an act that you knew was wrong, either when you did it or after?

These are the acts poison the soul and haunt the psyche, until they are faced and investigated and understood – they are the acts that recovering alcoholics reveal in their Fourth Step, so that they can unshackle themselves from their past – they are the acts that people bring to the confessional and the psychiatrist and the terrifying moment coming clean with the beloved, hoping that love and connection will not be annihilated by the revelation.

They are the acts we are doomed to repeat, if we do not come to understanding of them. They form the dysfunctional patterns that swirl our lives into chaos and drama, if left unexamined -- no matter how much we’d like to pretend that we’ve “moved on”.

Think about the act of physical healing – the tiniest splinter, left untended, either poisons you or festers out, and no disease can be truly resolved until the underlying cause is addressed. You go to the physician, and together, you investigate your symptoms – nothing is treatable until it’s diagnosed, and in order to arrive at a diagnosis and any hope of treatment, you have to tell the doctor the truth, and the doctor has to tell you the truth.

And this is much more than an illicit affair, or a drunken disaster. This is much more than a splinter.

If any individual you knew told you that they had performed the same acts that the Bush administration sanctioned – would you shrug your shoulders and say: “Well, that’s in the past -- let’s just move on”?

I know that my country harbors many forms of "disease" in parts of its body – racism, sexism, xenophobia, homophobia, transphobia, classism, religious intolerance, greed – the symptoms of which have been sometimes chronic and sometimes acute -- but we have pretty much always at least claimed to be seeking a cure.

Even as a person facing a number of these oppressions, I've held on to the hope that that claim was genuine. Through assassinations and wars of invasion, through Watergate and Iran-Contra, I have stubbornly believed that the United States could one day fully manifest as the healthy body implied in the purity of this embryonic phrase: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal . . . . ".

The national identity that most US citizens have clung to – the myth of our role as defenders of freedom and paragons of democracy – has been steadily eroding for years now, as leaders of our nation tiptoed up to, and then stepped over, the slippery slope of these oppressions. Descending into State-sponsored, State-justified torture means, to me, that we are approaching the awful bottom of that slippery slope.

Go ahead -- say it, out loud, that way -- State-Sponsored Torture.

I think we need to say this out loud to ourselves, and to hear it broadcast from our televisions, and blared from the floor of Congress, so that we can face reality -- the diagnosis is in, and we're sicker than we thought.

There is a festering wound in the heart of my country -- and that’s a dangerous place for deep infection – very dangerous indeed.

Reason #2 – Because There Is an Enormous Log In My Nation’s Eye

When you criticize your neighbor for doing despicable things, and then invade their home under the pretense of getting them to stop doing said despicable things, and in the process, do similarly despicable things – you look like an arrogant, hypocritical, disingenuous asshole.

Depending on your despicable acts, you may also look like a criminal arrogant, hypocritical, disingenuous asshole.

Even if you get away with it and no one turns you in, everyone in your neighborhood who heard you bitching earlier is going to know, and they are going to see right through your claims of moral superiority and righteous intention and ending tyranny and blah, blah, blah.

Until the United States cleans its own house, the entire world will rightfully suspect us of being exactly what we are being: Arrogant, hypocritical, lying assholes. A nation that doesn’t believe in its own Constitution or laws. A nation that is, at once, meddling busy-body and bossy, obnoxious teenager, throwing its weight around and refusing to take responsibility for its actions -- with a penchant for torture.

Finally, and perhaps most pragmatically, there is this reason to investigate:

Reason #3: Because We Said We Would, and then We Said We Would Again

The UN Convention Against Torture was signed by President Reagan in 1988, and ratified again in 1994. The United States has not withdrawn from the Convention, and is still bound by it. The Convention says, among other things, that:

"“torture" means any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession, punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a third person, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind, when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity.”
But . . . But, Waterboarding isn’t torture!!!

Doesn’t matter. The arguments that waterboarding is not torture, specious as they are, make no difference, because the Convention goes on to say:
“Each State Party shall undertake to prevent in any territory under its jurisdiction other acts of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment which do not amount to torture as defined in article I, when such acts are committed by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity. In particular, the obligations contained in articles 10, 11, 12 and 13 shall apply with the substitution for references to torture of references to other forms of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment."
But . . . But . . . Ticking TimeBomb!!!!

Doesn’t matter.
No exceptional circumstances whatsoever, whether a state of war or a threat of war, internal political in stability or any other public emergency, may be invoked as a justification of torture."
But . . . But . . . . I was ordered to do it!!!!

Doesn’t matter.
“An order from a superior officer or a public authority may not be invoked as a justification of torture.”
We just want to move on.

Well, poor us -- too bad. If we are to honor our agreements as a nation, we must investigate – because we say we will.
"Each State Party shall ensure that its competent authorities proceed to a prompt and impartial investigation, wherever there is reasonable ground to believe that an act of torture has been committed in any territory under its jurisdiction."
I won’t even go into the clauses that state that we will give victims of torture the right to redress and adequate compensation.

Suffice it to say that it is completely clear, even if an investigation was made and the acts committed under the Bush administration were found, by the entire world, not to be torture (and pigs could fly)– the United States – my country – WE – have an obligation to investigate -- promptly and impartially.

I believe that my government is currently in violation of its own laws and international treaties.

====================

So, here is my invitation to action.

Beginning this week, and continuing every week until an investigation is underway, I will write a letter to my congressional representatives, President Obama’s office, and the United Nations.

I will request from my reps that they push for investigations with every ounce of their strength. I will tell them that, if they do not, I will not vote for them again.

I will request from President Obama that he order investigations. I will tell him that, if he does not, I will not vote for him again.

I will request from the United Nations that they hold my nation accountable to the UN Convention. I will request this as a citizen of a country which I believe is currently in violation of both its own laws and its international treaties.

I will invite everyone I know to do the same.

If you'd like to join me, I'm glad to share my letters with you. I'll be publishing them at Teh Portly Dyke, as well.

Open Wide...

OFFS

Well, gay marriage isn't rallying the wingnuts like it used to; the immigrant bugaboo just doesn't have the teeth that it did, and even yelling "9/11!" at the top of their lungs is bringing Republicans more eye-rolling than success.

What to do, what to do... if only they could get Americans outraged again so they'd be taken seriously... hmmmm...

Oh! Of course! Flag Burning!

No, this is not a repeat. You didn't wake up in 1989 all over again. Put away the acid-washed Levi's and the Roxette CD. Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa is sponsoring a resolution to pass a constitutional amendment outlawing flag burning. And he defended it in an interview recently:

We think that burning a flag is desecration of the flag and that we should not desecrate the flag that there's been a lot of bloodshed by our veterans and people in uniform to protect the flag as a symbol of our country.

So it simply says that desecration of a flag is not protected by the First Amendment because the First Amendment was not written -- if you read the debate in 1790 -- the First Amendment was not written to protect nonverbal speech. It was to protect verbal speech and, more importantly, political speech.

So you weren't put in jail when you talked against the government as you were in England that the particular time. And so we want to make sure that we get the Constitution back to its original intent before the Supreme Court screwed it up.
I also wonder if this may have anything to do with anything else happening recently in Iowa. Hmmm...

Like I said earlier, the Republicans should change their symbol from an elephant to a One-Trick Pony.

(Tip 'o the energy dome to Scott Madin in comments.)

Open Wide...

From the OMFG Files

Actual CNN Headline: 'Hopeless' dads kill their families out of love, experts say.

Wow.

I mean, wow.

If you read the article, what "experts say" is actually that men (not "dads"—husbands are not fathers to their wives, but interesting construction there, CNN) kill their families because they are mentally ill.

And I would even take issue with the framing that mental illness is responsible for men seeing their wives and family members as their possessions: No, that's attributable to the Patriarchy, and many men who are not mentally ill share that regard for their families. Mental illness occupies only the space in which culturally-sanctioned possession turns into murder.

Have at it in comments, Shakers.

[H/T to everyone in the multiverse, and thank you muchly to each and every one of you who sent it.]

Open Wide...

More Holiday Pix (& Daily Kitteh)

Sorry I'm still not back 100% yet, Shakers. I've had a tangential blog issue occupying my time most of the day today and haven't had as much time to write as I'd hoped. Here are some more pix of the trip, and some pix of the kittehs Mama Shakes took while we were away.















(Please pretend my bra strap is not hanging out in that picture. Sigh.)











Open Wide...

Happy Birthday Pete!


(Photo taken by yours truly during 2006 tour)

Warmest of birthday wishes to a man who shares no equal, a man whose music helped me through adolescence, a man who did wonders for auto-destructive art, and the man who brought Space Cowgirl and me together.

Have a happy one, Pete! And do stop by with a solo tour every so often, won't you?

Open Wide...

Teh Gayz: In Ur Homes, Confusing Ur Children

Are the people in charge of advertising for NOM made of epic fail?

OK, yeah, that's a rhetorical question.



This ad rehashes the tired old lines that people who are gay having rights and living their lives, is immensely threatening to children's well-being. But as Genia pointed out, it has an added message:

The latest* anti-gay marriage commercial uses really young and really cute white kids to spread the organization’s bogus message that gay marriage is a serious threat to society. I’m guessing NOM figured people would worry more about gay marriage if the lives of cute white kids were at stake.
Emphasis mine. More below.

Some other things stood out to me as I transcribed the video. While there are three boys and three girls, only one of the girls speaks, while all of the boys do. Instead, the girls are directed to "look scared," from what I can tell. The boy who gets the most talk time is, not-surprisingly, fair-skinned and blond. And, as Liss noted when I e-mailed her the link,
I just LOVE how the final note is the kid saying, "I'm confused!" as if the world has to be structured so that it's easily comprehensible for children
I suppose this ad is a perfect one for modern-day social conservatism.

Transcript follows.

LB = Little Boy; LG = Little Girl

LB1: Grandma, my teacher says… if grandpa was a girl, that’s ok! You could still be married.

Shifts to image of frightened/confused looking LG1.

Voiceover: If we change the definition of marriage…

LG2: God created Adam and Eve? That was so old-fashioned.

Voiceover: Our kids will be taught a new way of thinking..

Shifts to image of confused looking LG3.

LB2: He should’ve created Anna and Eve!

LB1: If my Dad married a man, who would be my mom?

LB3: I’m confused

Voiceover: Marriage is between a man and a woman. Call Governor Lynch today and ask him to support marriage by not supporting House Bill 436.

Genia hat tips Renee.

(Crossposted)
________________________
*The NOM site dates the commercial to Fall 2007--even before the madness that is the "Gathering Storm" ad. Apparently, they dusted it off, tacked on the stuff about [NH] Governor Lynch, and voila!

Open Wide...

A Note in My Litany

by Shaker Tess

[Trigger warning.]

I will give you a gift that was not given to me: You will know beforehand that Paul is abusive.

* * *

Mostly, I hang out in progressive circles, or places where the management is progressive. It was from one of these places (comprised of a forum and an IRC channel), where I was an established, vocal, byword sort of feminist, that my first-ever boyfriend, Paul, found me last winter. He approached me, saying he'd had a crush on me for a while, and I didn't see any reason not to date him.

Our relationship got us a lot of attention in our community, and I felt popular and wanted and happy. I didn't actually know him very well, but he seemed like a good, kind person—or everyone in my community treated him that way. Which meant that all I had to do was get to know him, and I'd learn to love him…

* * *

It is important to understand that I have depression, a disability. I live on my college campus, where I don't know anyone. As a consequence, the internet has been my main source of social interaction since term started last September. I use it to maintain my real life relationships with folks back home, and I found a couple of communities over the last year that provided new, internet-only, meaningful relationships.

If you ask my parents why I am on academic probation, they will tell you their diagnosis: I spend too much time on the internet, and as a result, I am not sleeping well, not going to class, not keeping good contact with family, and wasting the money I saved for college. (After flunking three of my four classes fall quarter, my financial aid was dropped, and not having a good reason with which I could appeal beyond "sometimes I can't get myself out of bed in the morning—or all day long," I have been paying full tuition for the year.)

They could be right. They don't know that I have depression, but I suppose they could still be right. It's possible that the support and escapism I find on the internet are preventing me from actually getting my life into shape, by sometimes making me feel loved and valued and calm—complacent.

* * *

We bought plane tickets for me to see him over spring break, and, in the meantime, we talked…

…about sex. He started talking sex almost right away. And I responded. He told me I was beautiful and sexy, and as a 5'6", 230 pound woman, that wasn't something I was used to hearing, and I really liked feeling beautiful.

But something didn't feel right about how we were going about it. What we did took the form of a call and response; I didn't have nearly as much sexual experience as he did (he was 21 to my 18); I didn't do much; I was done to. It started when he was in the mood and it ended when he orgasmed. Every time. I asked him about it and he said not to worry about it, that it would be different when we met.

This was something I blamed on my inexperience, but I didn't know where to turn to fix myself. I couldn't ask the members of my community whether it was a problem, because Paul was an important member of the community, and I didn't want to embarrass him.

So I continued to try to get to know him, thinking that familiarity would ease me. Unfortunately, conversation with Paul was difficult. It didn't come easily; it was like pulling teeth. I often had to pry and pry to get him to talk, or I would experience some feelings while we were together of him...sort of not taking me seriously in a putting-me-on-a-pedestal way, like when he insisted that even my zits were sexy. Or if I'd tell him about something that was stressing me out and he'd say "I'm sure everything will be fine." Which didn't seem very much like listening. I brought it up with him more than once, and he agreed, but not a lot seemed to change. The main exception was sex, which he was generally eager for, and when he was done, we would re-subside into mostly silence.

It was getting harder to pretend that his sexual attentions made me feel beautiful; instead, they were making me feel gross. I felt as though everything he did to me was for the purpose of making me ready to get him off.

A couple of times I said "no." Either I wasn't in the mood (we'd hardly said anything that day) or I felt like I was being so passive that I wasn't in control, and I panicked. He stopped and said it was fine…and then he didn't talk to me. His conversation went right back to being short and sparse. I felt awful every time. Once or twice I tried to avert him without saying no directly, simply changing the subject, and he responded by continuing to talk about sexual things from a slightly different angle. I had small panic attacks every time I had to say no after a while, and often I didn't, and then when he was done, we would say how much longer it was until my flight, and I would feel anxious and scared.

* * *

We talked on Skype one time. He had a cam and I had a mic. Inevitably, he turned the conversation to sex, and I thought "oh, drat, we were having such a good time."

Paul asked me if I wanted him to jack off on the cam for me to see. I didn't want him to. I paused for a second, and said "I don't know," only I must have said it too late, because he didn't hear, or he didn't listen, and he did it anyway, and I squeezed my eyes shut and pressed my hands to my face and waited for it to be over…

When he was done I told him that I'd covered my eyes, but he didn't pick up on that either; he didn't respond; there was a bit of silence and he talked about something else.

What do you call cybersex that you didn't consent to?

* * *

Toward the end, I felt gross all the time. One time he msged me for sex, orgasmed, then left immediately to go see a movie. I felt like…I felt disgusting. I dreaded his attentions. And I was so confused why I should feel like that. It was just words on a screen, it was just the silly internet. It wasn't real.

I posted on the forums as much as I dared, in a section he didn't go, mentioning the problems I was having with the sex and saying that I didn't feel like he respected me, without naming his name (although the people who knew me would have known anyway), but hoping someone would see and care and contact me about it. No one did, but I did receive a private message from a teenager who also had a boyfriend in the community, and who was going through the same thing, and didn't know what to do about it, and asked me to let her know if I figured out a solution.

Here's how the relationship ended: Three weeks before I was supposed to go see him, I discovered that I had lost my passport. I searched for it; then attempted to get a new one. From day to day Paul went pretty wildly between two states of mind about it. He would either be totally sure that it was going to work out and refuse to even acknowledge my cautions that it might not, or he was utterly hopeless about not only the passport, but the future of our relationship and the potential for happiness in the rest of his life.

When I told Paul the trip we had planned wasn't going to work out, he broke up with me, saying he wasn't happy and couldn't handle the stress. My finals were that day and I was too drained to feel devastated, which I told him. I wasn't going to fight to keep him, because he was an adult and I respected his decision. I only asked him not to tell everyone, because I didn't want people to take sides.

"Sides?" he said. "What sides are there to take?"

"Just don't tell everyone," I said.

* * *

But it turned out that my lack of devastation was an affront to him. As the days passed I started to hear stories about myself back from people. "You admitted to never caring about the whole thing." "He told everyone that he broke up with you to escape your claws of callousness." "Admittedly my entire knowledge of the relationship comes from what Paul said…" "You didn't really lose your passport, you were just stalling…" "You didn't work hard enough to get your passport…"

He started leaving the chan whenever I entered, or entering the room and then leaving really fast when he saw I was there. When I was gone from the chan, he told the entire place that he hoped I'd get an incurable disease. He has publicly flirted with another woman by telling her that he'd never break her heart unless she turned out to be an "insane liar."

* * *

A couple of times, Paul said to me that he flirts a lot, in the context of "that won't bother you, will it sweetie?"

It wasn't until writing this post, when I was looking back on the logs and found yet another instance of him "flirting" with someone who clearly wasn't reciprocating, that I realized what was going on there.

Tiny anecdote: When I worked at my last job, one senior manager had an occasional habit of walking down the line of registers and grabbing, squeezing each bagger's neck as he passed. Blink and you missed it—he's gone! No time or chance given to react; you'd have to call him back to tell him to stop something that's already over, and who would want to cause that kind of trouble?

I've always known such men. They act inappropriately toward everyone, with smiles on their faces, and some number of people are comfortable with it, and some number of people are uncomfortable with it and say nothing. Then maybe there's you, who's uncomfortable with it and speaks up. Then these people—or the people who form their supportive structures—get to say it's your problem.

"No one else complained."

"You're ruining it for everyone."

"It's like a rule against being friendly."

"Why did you have to say something? Why couldn't you just let it be?"

Which is why most of us don't say anything when we're uncomfortable. That's how these people get away with their shit: they're riding on the backs of a thousand others like them who make hell for anyone who talks back.

* * *

Finally I was going too crazy to keep quiet, and I told one of my friends in the community, who reacted with support and comfort. Encouraged, I contacted several other people over the course of a few days.

I also tried to reach out by posting in the forum again, somewhere unobtrusive where I knew he didn't look, again not naming him, and again I got no response:
…I can't believe how long it took me to realize that "being nervous about when it was going to happen" and "waiting for it to be over" were really bad bad bad things.
He is a respected member of the community. I never heard anything against him before or during our relationship.

But upon reaching out in private, I found, unlooked for, other women who had been made to feel uncomfortable or intimidated by his behavior toward them.

I found a woman whose real-life sexual relationship with him still negatively affects her.
As far as sex related things: absolutely yes. I didn't actually fully realise it at the time, but it was completely about him. I'm glad you're a bit more aware of it than I was. I had a LOT of trouble at first with my current boyfriend remembering that it is not only about the guy, and that if something is not working for me, I can stop; I don't need to wait for him to be finished.

* * *

I have a strong grounding in feminism and a wealth of privilege propping me up. I have also been seriously abused by two people in my life. In other words, I have education, power, and experience. It still took hearing the stories from other women before I even thought the word "abuse."

Abuse, like rape, violence, and assault, are words that I tend to keep in glass, in case of emergency. I have told people stories of being touched on the nighttime street by drunken strangers, only to react negatively when they say "assault." What happened to me didn't hurt and was over in five seconds.

Or I will recount being thirteen years old and men throwing rocks at my sisters and I in broad daylight on a busy street, and I will look at those words, and think, "no, wait, it's not as bad as that makes it sound. I'm being misleading by describing exactly what happened because people reading it would conclude that these men assaulted us."

And assault is serious. And action should be taken on it. And what happened to me wasn't serious. It was just one of those things. There's more to assault.

Part of my personal journey has been attempting to realize that no, there isn't more to assault. (Some assaults are worse than others—I'd rather be grabbed at on the street for five seconds than beaten bloody. I don't want to compare what happened to me to what happened to anyone else. But the difference is of degree, not of type.)

There isn't more to abuse than what Paul did. There isn't more to nonconsent than that time he didn't wait for an answer, or didn't hear, or didn't listen. There isn't more to maltreatment than what he did. He did it to other women, and then he did it to me.

This conclusion was inescapable from the moment it found me. When I thought "abuse," I couldn't stop thinking it.

I had a series of realizations over several days, each of which shook me to my core. That he was a man who mistreats women. That if I had gone across the ocean to meet him, he would have raped me. I know this unshakably. That he had abused me without ever touching me.

Suddenly I knew why I felt—why I feel—so dirty inside. Why I feel humiliated when I think about our time together. Why I can't read our conversation logs and why I can't look at his face. Why I can't move on yet.

It makes too much sense not to be true. It is true. I know it.

The truth is a snare; you cannot have it without being caught…

* * *

My feminism didn't protect me. The community's feminism didn't protect me. Feminism is a product of the society it's created it in, so it makes perfect sense that a feminist community would provide the necessary social structures for a man who mistreats women to thrive and intimidate, and for the women to be silent.

It's nauseating, appalling, and deeply upsetting, but it makes perfect sense.

Welcome, Paul, to my litany. There was the boy in sixth grade who liked to stroke my back. There were the men who threw rocks, the customer in the parking lot who tried to get me over to his car, the drunk college boys who grabbed me at night. There was the senior manager who liked to squeeze my neck, and there were the boys in my drama club, and there were others.

And there was you.

It took hearing it from other women before I even thought the word "abuse."

So now other women are going to hear about it from me.

Open Wide...

I Can't Imagine Why Our Heads Are Spinning

Zuh? Has Zombie Reagan somehow unlocked the secret of time travel?

Despite those setbacks (or perhaps because of them), Steele will insist that the future of the GOP lies not in looking back but in pushing forward — using the tried and true example of conservative icon Ronald Reagan.

“Ronald Reagan never lived in the past,” Steele will say. “Ronald Reagan was all about the future. If President Reagan were here today he would have no patience for Americans who looked backward.”
"My fellow Americans. As a young boy, I dreamed of being a baseball. But tonight I say, we must move forward, not backward, upward not forward, and always twirling, twirling, twirling towards freedom!"

Hey, don't blame me. I voted for Kodos.

Open Wide...

Sorry?

RNC Chair Michael Steele is done with being sorry.

The era of apologizing for Republican mistakes of the past is now officially over. It is done.
When did they ever apologize in the first place?

If, as Eric Kleefeld reports, he means this -- "Tonight, we tell America: we know the past, we know we did wrong. My bad." -- then it doesn't feed the bulldog. There's more to an apology than just saying it; it means realizing what you've done, making amends and promising never to do it again. So far all they've done is just keep up with the same old crap with no signs of changing.

If you don't mean it, don't bother.

Cross-posted.

Open Wide...

Well, Whaddaya Know!

He was a uniter, after all!

The decline in Republican Party affiliation among Americans in recent years is well documented, but a Gallup analysis now shows that this movement away from the GOP has occurred among nearly every major demographic subgroup. Since the first year of George W. Bush's presidency in 2001, the Republican Party has maintained its support only among frequent churchgoers, with conservatives and senior citizens showing minimal decline.

So far in 2009, aggregated Gallup Poll data show the divide on leaned party identification is 53% Democratic and 39% Republican -- a marked change from 2001, when the parties were evenly matched, according to an average of all of that year's Gallup Polls.
Thanks, Georgie!

Open Wide...

News from Shakes Manor

Liss: Mel Gibson's girlfriend is pregnant.

Iain: What a good Catholic he is!

Liss: Well, Catholics aren't supposed to use birth control and they obviously didn't.

Iain: Touché.

I have begun to suspect, Shakers, that being a moral scold and self-proclaimed paragon of virtue makes dudez totes horny. That shit works better than Viagra.

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime

The Ladybugs' Picnic


This was one of my favorite Sesame Street counting songs when I was a kid. And it still frequently gets stuck in my head, or I find myself absently humming along to it while doing some household task, to this day.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

"Alice laughed: "There's no use trying," she said; "one can't believe impossible things."
"I daresay you haven't had much practice," said the Queen. "When I was younger, I always did it for half an hour a day. Why, sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast."
-from Alice in Wonderland
Quick: What's one of your favorite quotes from a "children's" book, off the top of your head?

Open Wide...

Daily Kitteh

Monkey See; Monkey Do







This monkey just stays out of the way and waits patiently for a banana kitty treat:

Open Wide...

I Say Tomato, You Say Grotesque

Wednesday, while Iain was sprawled out on the bed "reading," I spent a few minutes glancing at headlines and came across this article in the New York Times about the discovery of a 35,000-year-old mammoth ivory carving of a full-figured female form.


I thought it was lovely and compelling and beautiful, found it interesting that possibly the oldest sculpture of a human form ever found is of a body that looks like mine, considered it rather humorous in the context of Teh ZOMG Obesity Crisis!!!11!1eleventy!! Mostly, I just thought it was cool.

Chuckling, I emailed the link to Iain under the subject line: "Look like anyone you know?"

I had no bad feelings about that. In fact, I had good feelings about it; I was smiling as I sent it. That is what I look like—big boobs, big belly. With that big body, I was spending the week swimming and walking and lounging and fucking and sleeping and eating and getting on boats and feeling sand and grass between the toes of my bare feet. I don't have any reason to hate my body, were it not for external messaging.

I saw on Memeorandum that the BBC had titled their article about the statuette: "Ancient man sculpts a grotesque vision of the female form."


Well then.

I am officially too old to care on my own behalf; at this point in my life, my only genuine response to being labeled a living grotesquerie is laughter. If ignorance is bliss, indifference is ecstasy.

I do, however, remember what it was like to be a girl with big boobs and a big belly, haunted by persistent negative and marginalizing cultural narratives, jangling their chains and whispering against her cheek that she is ugly, disgusting, less than—a girl wholly unequipped to counter those narratives even in her own thinking, because she has been stripped of any remnant of self-esteem. And it is for that girl, and all the girls and women, and men and boys, who feel the pang of grotesque that I say, with all due respect: Fuck yourselves, you fat-shaming assholes.

The BBC has since changed its title.

Open Wide...