I Don't Want to Go on the Cart!*

Sorry I've been AWOL, Shakers. I've really been knocked on my ass by whatever flu or virus or wev I've got, and I've barely been out of bed for days, except for moments when I've made it as far as the couch. No evident cause; my stomach isn't upset and I'm not congested. I'm just intensely achy and fatigued, spending much of my time alternating between the shivers and imminent supernova under various combinations of blankets and comforters. And cats.

I have no will to eat or drink anything, even though I'm hungry. The only thing I can tolerate is raspberry sorbet, which is actually keeping me pretty well hydrated, lol.

Generally, I feel like a big unbrushed tooth.

So I am returning to my bed, and I'll be back as soon as I can. My apologies for not returning email. And thank you so very, very much to Shakers Car, InfamousQBert, RedEmma, iamnotanoctopus, GABertha, katebee, and Katherine (and others whom I don't know, but are invited to pipe up in comments!) for sending me the beautiful quilt that is currently wrapped around my legs and icy feet:


It brings a whole new meaning to Shaker Quilt! I love each and every square, and the teaspoon in the center makes me grin every time I look at it.

ETA: Worry not, Top Chefies. The open thread will be posted for the finale. And Losties, you know I'll be watching tonight even if I have to hold my eyes open with toothpicks, and I promise to put up the open thread tomorrow.

-----------------------------

* If you don't get the title, see here.

Open Wide...

Wednesday Blogaround

What's the frequency, Shakers?

Recommended Reading:

Archie McPhee: Failed Snow Globes

Tom Colicchio: The Big Not-So-Easy

I Can Has Cheezburger?: Skuuz Mi

Cliffie's Notes: Good Work, Ladies! (That's one heck of a necktie!)

Doobybrain: 3M Nuclear Grade Duct Tape

Action Figure of the Day: Han Solo (Bespin Outfit)

Leave your links in comments...

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime (well, 36 seconds)



Commercial for the General Mills Monster cereals
The greatest cereals ever made! (BooBerry is my favorite!)

Open Wide...

the President's address

In case anyone wanted to watch it live here...

UPDATE: The speech is finished. The White House has it posted--if you'd like to read the full remarks, you can do so.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

What "bathroom product" do you purchase for the sole purpose of pampering yourself?

As you all know now, I have, er, bathroom issues. If there's one thing I don't take lightly, it's "beauty" products. With my teflon beard, I take shaving very seriously, too. So rather than using some shaving gel and a disposable, I only use Proraso shaving products for scraping hair off my face. I use the pre-shave, I lather up with my brush using the eucalyptus shaving cream, and I use the liquid cream aftershave. Bliss! After all, if have to shave every day, I try to make it a pleasant experience.

For the rest of my noggin, I bite the bullet and spend a little more on Sharps: Mission Control shampoo. It costs more, yes, but the bottle lasts me forever, and it's the best smelling shampoo I've ever used. Afterwards, I tame flyaway with Guck-in-a-Puck.

So, what about you? Bath beads? Moisturizers? Luxurious towels? Breathe-Right nose strips?

Open Wide...

No Words

I don't know what disturbs me most about this CNN report, about a dying little girl in Texas whose parents let her marry at the age of nine:

1) The obvious;

2) The fact that her dying wish was to get married;

3) The fact that her parents talk about "having to do this now," as if a delusional nine-year-old cannot be told no; or

4) The fact that at no point in the two-minute piece does the CNN reporter acknowledge that there's anything even remotely unusual (or, hello, exploitative) about parents "giving away" their prepubescent daughter in marriage for the entertainment of a national TV audience.

Open Wide...

I Should Have Changed That Stupid Lock

As the weeks since Obama’s inauguration have unfolded, I’ve watched the “Grand Old Party” vacillate between tantrums worthy of a toddler and crotchety crank-fests that rival the curmudgeonly old neighbor who just wants you off their lawn!! (By which, of course, I intend no general insult to toddlers or elders, most of whom possess infinitely better manners and more wisdom than the RNC).

There have been many comparisons drawn between the last eight years and a bad relationship.

Just google “Breaking up is hard to do” Republicans -- it will net you a whole bunch of stuff (interestingly, much of it from conservatives who are sick of, or feel dumped by, the GOP).

Know what, though?

The longer I look at the metaphor, the more apt it appears.

First of all – our national relationship with Pat (yes, let’s call hir “Pat”*) . . .
. . . the relationship with Pat was never really good.

You knew it. All your friends knew it.

Maybe some of them even tried to warn you, at first.

France would try to casually work something into the conversation like:

“You know who Pat reminds me of a little bit? Chris. Didn’t you date Chris right before you went bankrupt? You know . . . . after your breakdown?”

Or maybe you were invited to dinner at Denmark’s house, and they “accidentally” left an old newspaper clipping on the kitchen counter -- about that time when Pat had to resign, because the boss found out that Pat had hired some guys posing as plumbers to break into the hotel room of a romantic rival?

As time passed, though, your friends gave up hope, and one by one, just sort of drifted away.

They stopped coming to potlucks, or they would leave suddenly with an unconvincing: “Whoa!!! -- Look at the time!” . . . . . . whenever Pat tried to organize one of those pre-emptive wars that were gonna be “Soooooooo Awesome!”

Behind your back, your old buddies shook their heads and opined that some day, you’d come to your senses.

And you ask yourself now –

“Why did I stay?”

Well, it was all about the security, wasn’t it?

I mean, that was Pat’s mantra, after all: “I’ll protect you! I’m the only one who can protect you!”

Every so often, you’d look over and think: “You know, I’m not even attracted to Pat. I don’t know if I was ever really attracted to Pat . . . . ”, and maybe you’d say something that sorta-kinda sounded like break-up talk -- and your “sweetie” would get all shifty-eyed and sullen and change the subject.

“Did you hear that report on the radio this morning? Statistics show that the world is 99.87% more dangerous than it was eight years ago – did you know that?”

And then Pat would just stare at you -- in that creepy way – that way that always freaked you out.

When Pat tapped your phone and put a key-logger on your computer, it was all about “protecting” you -- and hey, if you weren’t trying to hook up with someone else, why would you even be worried about Pat knowing who you were calling and what websites you were surfing -- right? Right!?!?!

Often (oh, soooo very often) -- you’d think: “How did I end up with this person?”

To this day, you’re still parsing that.

Face it: You’re going to need therapy -- lots of therapy.

But it all came to a head when you found the credit card statements.

Turns out those little pre-emptive war parties Pat had been throwing? They weren’t actually about protecting you at all – it was a front so that your significant other could line the pockets of those sleazeball friends that were always hanging around and eating your food and watching CSI on your big-screen.

When you saw that $9 billion went to Chris (Chris? Really!? Chris, of all people!?) – that was it.

Pat had claimed the $9 billion just got “lost” somewhere.

Asshole.

It didn’t take long to pack -- you didn’t have much left.

Pat had taken all your educational programs and infrastructure to the Goodwill a long time ago, claiming they just cluttered up the house, and you weren’t going to need them anyway, because Pat and the Magical Self-Regulating Free Market![tm] were going to be with you forever, and provide every little thing you would ever need.

When you drove away in your beater car (Pat kept the gold-plated jet, of course), that’s when the reality started to sink in for everyone.

Your old friends were delighted about the break-up, of course -- but Pat?

Pat just didn’t know how to quit you.

First, the phone calls: “You’ll regret this! Who’s gonna keep you safe!!??>>!111!!!??!” – by now, though, this canard was just background noise to you. You started letting Pat’s calls go to voice-mail every time.

Then it was: “But -- we were meant to be together!”

There were the cards, and letters, and mass-emailers, and youtube videos, and shock-jocks, and pundits, and ads.

Who can forget the night when all Pat’s sleaze-ball friends showed up on your front lawn, chanting: “Center Right Nation! Center Right Nation! Center Right Nation . . . ”?

And then, Pat -- going on all those talk shows, insisting that you were “perfect for each other”, and going on and on about how you just don’t know your own mind, and this new asshole that you’re dating?– “ZOMG! What till you find out who this ‘Alex-person’ really is – are you gonna be sorry!!!”

And the tantrums.

Oh. My. God. -- The Tantrums.

Pat screaming that the credit card bills had nothing to do any pre-emptive war parties.

What pre-emptive war parties? What torture? Zuh? Are you crazy? Never happened -- you need help!”

Pat blaming your financial meltdown on your previous ex- -- and when you tried to make a plan to get back on track with your money?

All Pat would say was: “No.”

“No, No, No, NO, NOOOOO!!!!”

Like a two-year old who just learned the word.

Followed by:
“I’m saying ‘No’ because I have Principles[tm]! . . . . . and Alex is a big fat liberal muslim SOCIALIST, anyway! -- So there!!!!”

You wanted to know how many laws the sleazeball friends (and Pat) had broken while they were partying.

Pat told you that telling you would be dangerous . . . . . dangerous for you . . . . . . (and again with that creepy stare – followed by another emphatic “No!”, just for good measure, lest you forget that Pat had Principles![tm]).

You could almost come to a state of compassion when the whole Now-I-Dress-Just-Like-Alex-No-Really-I’m-Hip thing started -- because when Pat tosses around phrases like “urban/suburban hiphop” and “bling-bling” around, it’s just . . . . sad, really.

Pathetic, and desperate, and tragically, tragically sad.

(And a little scary, to be perfectly honest.)

So, after a long day dealing with the ex-, you come home, exhausted, to Alex – dear, dear Alex -- always sympathetic, always calm (a great dancer) -- but then you find yourself wondering:
“Is Alex really that cute, or is Alex just . . . . way cuter than Pat?”

You wonder how much of your attraction is rebound, and how much is real.

And sometimes you wonder whether Alex is really listening to you or not – Alex can get that distracted look, where the nods are in all the right places, but you’re just not sure . . .

And then you wonder whether that’s all just projection – unfortunate fallout of your “Pat-Damage”.

Because now, when Alex does something simple and nice like bringing you a snack while you are paying bills, you eye the plate just a wee bit suspiciously -- and that's when you realize just how bad it really was with Pat.

You click the close button on the disastrous spreadsheet. You get a beer and cuddle up on the sofa with Alex to watch Dancing with the Stars -- after you put the post-it on the computer . . . . . .

. . . . . .reminding you to make an appointment with that therapist tomorrow.

(*Note on non-gendered language choice: I think that it would be extremely difficult for anyone to fault me if I referenced the clusterfuck of the past eight years as a simple “bad boyfriend” corollary, given the GOP’s overwhelmingly cisgendered-white-christian-male slant – but I will let my progressive tendencies prevail and refrain from maligning all men by associating them with the Republican Party – because that would be -- you know . . . . mean.)

Open Wide...

About That Child-Prostitution Sting

Although I applaud the FBI for taking seriously the victimization of child prostitutes--and my local newspaper for noting that the girls in question were "rescued," not arrested--I can't help but wish that ANY of the stories about the rescue had mentioned the fact that the average age at which girls "enter prostitution" is between 12 and 14... suggesting that many of the grown women among the 571 arrested on prostitution charges last week had unquestionably been abused themselves. To suggest that a teenage prostitute, once she turns 18, crosses an invisible threshold from victim to victimizer ignores the circumstances that cause young women to "take up" prostitution in the first place.

Open Wide...

Random YouTubery: Carl Orff's Carmina Burana (1935-36)

The last time I posted a symphony YouTubery, several singers started reminiscing in comments about Carmina Burana. This past weekend, the Pittsburgh Symphony performed Carmina Burana with the Mendelssohn Choir of Pittsburgh, directed by Betsy Burleigh.

We were way up in the gallery at Heinz Hall . That's the best place to be for a choral concert; the sound is amazing and the gallery is filled with student groups from local universities. Carmina Burana is enormously popular and students up in the gallery (some in matching jackets) were actually singing along.

From the program notes by Mark Rohr (with my added hyperlinks):


Carl Orff’s reputation as a composer derives from a mere twelve works. He wrote many more than that, but with Carmina Burana he changed his methods of composition so radically that he disavowed all his previous music. “Everything I have written to date,” he wrote his publisher, “and which you have unfortunately printed, can be destroyed. With Carmina Burana, my collected works begin.”

Actually, Orff’s name would still be known among musicians and music educators even if he had never composed a note. Orff believed that even very young children had latent musical abilities. By the 1930s he had developed a system that combined movement and dance with musical improvisation on simple pitched percussion instruments. His methods were so effective that his ideas still inform early-childhood music education today.

Those ideas seem to have changed his approach to composition, too. He simplified his music greatly, and came to believe that for music to have the maximum impact it must be part of a theatrical presentation including the spoken word, singing, movement, and dance. When he first encountered the poems of Carmina Burana, he saw his chance to put his new theories about composition into effect.

Carmina Burana means “Songs of Beuren,” and refers to a 13th-century manuscript discovered in the Benedictine abbey of Benediktbeuern in 1803 and published in 1847. It is a collection of some 250 poems left by the goliards, itinerant clerics and scholars who rejected what the church had become and concerned themselves instead with earthly delights. Today we might call them college dropouts.

The poems are mostly in Latin, the international language of the day, but some are in medieval German and old French as well. Their subject matter is wide-ranging, with particular emphasis on eating, drinking, gambling, and love-making, all peppered with a lively distrust of authority. The theme that binds them together is fortune, that mysterious force that may lift us to great heights one moment only to dash us to the ground the next.

In fact it was the manuscript’s cover, with its depiction of the goddess Fortuna standing with her wheel of Fate, that inspired Orff to read on and ultimately compose this work. Orff creates a cover to his own book by beginning and ending Carmina Burana with the dramatic chorus “O Fortuna,” a mesmerizing lament on how the “whirling wheel” of Fortune is invariably fickle.

There are a lot of poor-quality Carmina Burana videos on YouTube. That doesn't surprise me, as I saw several amateur cell-phone video producers in Heinz Hall this weekend. I did manage to find a couple of decent excerpts (lyrics for The Roast Swan and O Fortune are below the fold in Latin and English):


Monteverdichor Würzburg singing parts 11-13. Part 12, The Roast Swan, begins around 3:00




Ave Formosissima and O Fortuna (finale) performed by the Carl Orff Orchestra Stadtkapelle Tulln with conductor Hans-Peter Manse

Lyrics for the entire work are available at Classical Net.

12. Cignus ustus cantat (The Roast Swan)

Olim lacus colueram,     Once I lived on lakes,
olim pulcher extiteram,     once I looked beautiful
dum cignus ego fueram.     when I was a swan.
(Male chorus)
Miser, miser!     Misery me!
modo niger     Now black
et ustus fortiter!     and roasting fiercely!
(Tenor)
Girat, regirat garcifer;     The servant is turning me on the spit;
me rogus urit fortiter;     I am burning fiercely on the pyre:
propinat me nunc dapifer,     the steward now serves me up.
(Male Chorus)
Miser, miser!     Misery me!
modo niger     Now black
et ustus fortiter!     and roasting fiercely!
(Tenor)
Nunc in scutella iaceo,     Now I lie on a plate,
et volitare nequeo     and cannot fly anymore,
dentes frendentes video:     I see bared teeth:
(Male Chorus)
Miser, miser!     Misery me!
modo niger     Now black
et ustus fortiter!     and roasting fiercely!


25. O Fortuna (O Fortune)

O Fortuna,     O Fortune,
velut luna     like the moon
statu variabilis,     you are changeable,
semper crescis     ever waxing
aut decrescis;     and waning;
vita detestabilis     hateful life
nunc obdurat     first oppresses
et tunc curat     and then soothes
ludo mentis aciem,     as fancy takes it;
egestatem,     poverty
potestatem     and power
dissolvit ut glaciem.     it melts them like ice.


Sors immanis     Fate - monstrous
et inanis,     and empty,
rota tu volubilis,     you whirling wheel,
status malus,     you are malevolent,
vana salus     well-being is in vain
semper dissolubilis,     and always fades to nothing,
obumbrata     shadowed
et velata     and veiled
michi quoque niteris;     you plague me too;
nunc per ludum     now through the game
dorsum nudum     I bring my bare back
fero tui sceleris.     to your villainy.


Sors salutis     Fate is against me
et virtutis     in health
michi nunc contraria,     and virtue,
est affectus     driven on
et defectus     and weighted down,
semper in angaria.     always enslaved.
Hac in hora     So at this hour
sine mora     without delay
corde pulsum tangite;     pluck the vibrating strings;
quod per sortem     since Fate
sternit fortem,     strikes down the strong man,
mecum omnes plangite!     everybody weep with me!

Open Wide...

Dollhouse Open Thread

Who's been watching Dollhouse? That's Joss Whedon's new show about... well... it's sort of high concept, and takes some explanation. (Unlike, say, Hart To Hart, which you could sum up as "husband and wife millionaires solve murders in their spare time" or According To Jim which can be described as "sucks" or Sabrina The Teenage Witch, a show which requires no further description.) Let me just quote the Wikipedia entry, since that covers it nicely:

Eliza Dushku plays a young woman called Echo, a member of a group of people known as "Actives" or "Dolls." The Dolls have had their personalities wiped clean so they can be imprinted with any number of new personas, including memory, muscle memory, skills, and language, for different assignments (referred to as engagements)... The Actives are then hired out for particular jobs -- crimes, fantasies, and the occasional good deed. On engagements, Actives are monitored internally (and remotely) by Handlers. In between tasks, they are mind-wiped into a child-like state and live in a futuristic dormitory/laboratory, a hidden facility nicknamed "The Dollhouse."
I only half paid attention to the first episode, where Echo was sent out as a hostage negotiator and rescued a little girl from some real dastardly characters. Seemed kind of cool and I liked the idea of Echo going out every week as a new and different badass to put the smackdown on some douchenozzle who had it coming. But then I watched the second ep: Echo was sent out on assignment to be little more than the client's fuck toy for the weekend. The Dollhouse, it seems, is just a high-end, high-tech whorehouse. If you need a highly-skilled hostage negotiator, they'll provide one. If you just want a partner for a long weekend of sexy times, they do that too.

And that latter scenario becomes seriously problematic when you take into account the Actives have no real consent. They've merely been programmed for attraction to their clients. (And yes, it could be argued that the Actives volunteered to work at the Dollhouse; though I'd counter that Echo was given the choice of working there "voluntarily" or face something much worse, and again we're taken back to the question of whether she's really in a position to say no at all.)

So, what's the deal with the show then? Whedon is a self-described feminist, and someone who once talked of "the very casual, almost insidious misogyny that just runs through so much of [Hollywood] fiction." I wonder why he's created a show that seems, on its surface, to embody that "insidious misogyny" he so loathes.

As Liss said in an email earlier "I'm wondering if the show is an allegory with the potential to be a strong commentary on the rape culture, but so far most of the emails I'm getting (even from Whedon fans) seem to regard it as a load of ick." Are we, the audience supposed to root for the scientists and handlers who've wiped Echo's memories, as they do their level best to keep her from harm? Or are we siding with the FBI agent intent on rescuing Echo and presumably bring down Dollhouse? And what about Echo's newest handler, a man with serious moral and ethical qualms about what his employers are doing?

Honestly, I don't know where the show is heading or what Whedon is (or isn't) up to. Your thoughts?

(I meant to add these links in when I wrote this post, but completely forgot. Thanks to natbsat for the reminder. Episode one is here. Episode two here.)

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime (And Blog Note)

Hello, Shakers! Our Blogmistress is feeling very under the weather, so apologies that this is going up late. She may or may not be in today; the rest of us will try to pick up the slack. In the meantime, enjoy this Sid & Marty Krofft ripoff McDonald's Commercial!



Smile and say Cheeseburger! That's it, conform!

Open Wide...

Take Action for Autism!


As most of you know, a bitch’s older brother is autistic. Autism has been in the news a lot and there have been tons of features exploring how autism impacts a family…but one of things rarely covered is the economic impact and the lack of insurance coverage for treatment.

I grew up in a house where everything from a family meal to an outing to pick up groceries was a structured treatment…my parents tried everything and anything to try to help my brother adjust to the world.

Now that my sister and this bitch are co-guardians, we are working to try and make the world adjust more to my brother.

And looming over every option…whether a family has a young child or an adult with autism…is the issue of funding and what is or isn’t covered by insurance.

Well, we now have a chance to act through legislation that would reform the way the insurance industry handles coverage for treatments of autism spectrum disorder.

Legislation is being considered in several state including Missouri. Autism Votes is asking for folks to contact your legislator and let them know that insurance coverage matters and that you are watching.

Take a moment and visit the Autism Votes website.

Get familiar with legislation pending in your state.

And contact those charged with making decisions and casting these important votes!

Thanks.

Open Wide...

Survival of the Twittest

Following up on yesterday's QotD, I guess I'm just hopelessly behind, but I don't get the Twitter phenomenon. But I see I'm not alone.

When you talk about Twitter, you might as well be talking about the Snuggie: People around you swear that it’s actually useful, but you can’t help thinking it silly and declaring, “I just don’t get what all the buzz is about.”

But in Washington, the social networking and microblogging service is quickly becoming part of the daily media diet — and a powerful tool in the hands of those who are adept at making their points in 140 characters or fewer.

Here are the new maestros of the tweet — Washington’s 10 Most Influential Twitterers.
The #1 most influential twitterer in DC? Karl Rove.

That tells me everything I need to know.

HT to John Cole.

Cross-posted from Bark Bark Woof Woof.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Following on Liss's question from last week, what one modern convenience have you chosen to live without?

Much to the consternation of Liss and Misty (who gave me an unending amount of grief over it during my recent visit) and just about everyone else I know, I don't actually own a cell phone. After being tied to one for work for several years, I've since refused to carry one.

Open Wide...

Rove: "Fuck Ya!"

Remember last week when Karl Rove's attorney said Rove wouldn't invoke the Fifth Amendment to avoid answering questions about Attorneygate...? Yeah, he just decided to not show up at all instead:

Pursuant to a subpoena issued earlier this month, Karl Rove was due to appear for a hearing before the House Judiciary Committee today. But as CongressMatters reports, despite being "expected" to appear this time, Rove was a no show. Contacted by ThinkProgress, the House Judiciary Committee confirmed the report of Rove's absence. Days before leaving office, "Bush's White House counsel, Fred Fielding, sent letters to Rove, Miers, and Bolten, instructing them to continue to ignore congressional demands for information about anything they did while at the While House."
Man, I hate that guy.

Open Wide...

Daily Kitteh

I thought Sophs was looking pretty cute hanging out in her basket...



...then BAM!!! Megacuteness!



"I am a metric fuckton of adorable in a 6-pound package."

Open Wide...

Unfair Burdens

by Shaker Marissa

As feminists, we talk a lot about something society seems to not even really notice: That one of the biggest burdens of sexism, outside of violence, is unpaid carework. This can range from the obvious, like parenting, to the hard to quantify, such as remembering birthdays on someone else's behalf. But most of the time, when we are discussing these burdens, we are talking about the work that grown women do. There is, however, another group of people that the unfair burden of unpaid carework sometimes falls upon.

I'm talking about children and teenagers who are the primary caretakers of family members.

For most of recorded history, women have shouldered the primary responsibility for family carework, but in families where there was just too much to do, or especially those poorer households where women took on paid employment (as they have always done since paid employment began, whatever Republicans may believe), the burden then fell to their daughters. Sometimes, it fell on sons if there were no daughters or they were very young.

In the United States, the phenomenon of children taking care of adults is on the rise, due to a number of factors. Obviously, one of the largest in that most women now have some form of paid employment by necessity, meaning that they are simply not available 24-7 to care for the sick or disabled. Another is that, unlike other industrialized nations, not only do we not have a nationalized health service, but, in addition, we also lack a functional social system of family support for those with severe/chronic illnesses or disabilities. The third wheel of this trainwreck is the fact that, with good reason, people are choosing to have fewer children, and often later in life. These facts combine to create a world where your 12-year-old kid may be the only person who CAN take care of you if you lose your health.

The phenomenon has grown to the point now where it is estimated that 3 percent of households in America have a child who is a caretaker, finally starting to catch the attention of the mainstream media, including the New York Times, which just published a piece about it, available here.

The piece triggered a big response in me, because I was one of those kids—the good daughter who did her duty. I'm not saying that I regret that I was able to help my father live a more dignified life, and was able to have him around as I grew up. But I am saying that it was an enormous burden, the ramifications of which I am still dealing with today.

My father had a severe brainstem stroke when I was 14, during Christmas break. He was completely paralyzed, and had to be on life support for 6 weeks. We were extremely lucky, in that he partially recovered from his paralysis, was able to get off of life support, and after a full year of physical therapy, was even able to walk, although only for short distances and unsteadily. He still requires basically 24 hours supervision to this day, because he has to take such high concentrations of blood thinners, that minor bruises could kill him from the bleeding, and additionally his ability to feel pain never completely returned, so it is hard for him to know when he has injured himself.

The cost to our family was huge. I'm still paying on what it cost me. My grades took a severe hit that year—a combination of sleep deprivation, emotional turbulence, and being an unsupervised 14-year-old. I never was able to get them above a B average after that, which made it hard to get scholarships later. We lived in an isolated area, several miles by major highway to town, so I was pretty much stuck at home since there was no safe way home if I stayed after school. My mom had to work really long hours to pay our bills, as we had always been a 2-income family, solidly working class.

In addition, I couldn't take an after-school job when I got older, because my dad's condition was just too dangerous for him to be alone. When I graduated, and wanted to go to school, going away wasn't an option, and, financially, going to school full-time wasn't either. So I did the part-time community college route, and ended up getting married just out of high school. It worked out, but I don't think I would have gone that route so fast if I hadn't been so desperate to have a good friend to lean on. I had my kids early, too, mostly because I figured that I might as well have them when I was clearly going to be home with them, instead of trying to figure out young children and full-time employment. I waited out my mom's retirement; she finally got it this last year, and now I am trying to pull my life back together.

I still haven't finished school. I'm finally in my last year, and it is getting increasingly hard to explain to people why I'm not done yet at 28. I've had several promising internship interviews, for a career based on my degree, but they tend to dry up when they realize I'm not 22. I tend to get callbacks when I explain my age because of my kids, but never when I explain my missing decade that I was taking care of my dad.

I wonder what I might have done with the last 10 years if I had other real options. You know, other than letting my dad end up in some institution, because we didn't have the money for a real nursing home or to have someone come to the house and help.

And I worry about those kids who had it worse than me. After all, my mom COULD work and support us. We had health insurance. We owned our house. I was in reasonable health and without problems of my own. I had some money set aside for college, and a husband who truly supported my ambitions, and understood my obligations. Take away any of these things, and I would likely be in a much worse place.

And so while it's nice that people are talking about this now, I have to ask: Why haven't we been talking about this before?

Open Wide...

Support the Family Violence Prevention & Services Act

Marcella attended a webinar last week during which she found out that the Family Violence Prevention and Services Act expired last fall. Right now, funding is being made available only via a "continuing resolution" contingent on Congress' attention and willingness to appropriate funds. Because the FVPSA is the primary federal funding source for domestic violence shelters, we need to make some noise to ensure funding is included in the fiscal year 2009 budget. Marcella explains:

The Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) provides some funding for coordinated community responses which includes domestic violence, but the core funding for DV shelters is critical. Many states are slashing their funding to a variety of programs and this will likely include cutting funding related to helping victims of domestic violence.

Unfortunately, those who have always opposed DV shelters and other services for victims of violent crime will use our current economic crisis as an excuse to heighten their opposition to funding these programs. Their excuse is invalid. Effective prevention and effective responses to violence is less expensive than waiting until the violence escalates to the point where it cannot be ignored.

I am asking each US citizen who reads this post to contact President Obama, your 2 senators (or 1 if you live in MN) and your representative and ask them all to support the reathorization and the funding for the Family Violence Prevention and Services Act. After you contact your representatives, please ask those you know to do the same.

Helping a victim get out alive is both a better outcome and cheaper than arresting, trying and incarcerating a man for brutally murdering his wife. This is also a better outcome for children who end up losing both parents.
Contact the President here. Contact your Senators here. Contact your representative here.

Ask them to reauthorize and fund the Family Violence Prevention and Services Act.

Open Wide...

Support the Troops Fail

An AP investigation has found that the Army nonprofit Army Emergency Relief (AER), which is the largest charity operating within the US military, has withheld millions of dollars slated for returning soldiers:

Between 2003 and 2007 — as many military families dealt with long war deployments and increased numbers of home foreclosures — Army Emergency Relief grew into a $345 million behemoth. During those years, the charity packed away $117 million into its own reserves while spending just $64 million on direct aid, according to an AP analysis of its tax records.

Tax-exempt and legally separate from the military, AER projects a facade of independence but really operates under close Army control. ...AER's mission is to ease cash emergencies of active-duty soldiers and retirees, and to provide college scholarships for their families. Its emergency aid covers mortgage payments and food, car repairs, medical bills, travel to family funerals, and the like.

...AER executives defend their operation, insisting they need to keep sizable reserves to be ready for future catastrophes.

"Look at the stock market," said retired Col. Dennis Spiegel, AER's deputy director for administration. Without the large reserve, he added, "We'd be in very serious trouble."

...Meanwhile, civilian charities for service members and veterans say they are swamped by the desperate needs of recent years, with requests far outstripping ability to respond.

According to 2007 U.S. Census Bureau figures, 1.3 million veterans — or 6 percent — lived in poverty, with 537,000 unemployed.
There's more, much more, at the link.

Open Wide...

Monday YouTubery

Wugh, this Monday seems to range from "Meh" to "Can I get a do over, please?" from people I've talked to. So for this Monday Blahs, a video to make you smile:

Dancing 2008


The one in the Demilitarized Zone in Korea made me laugh out loud--it was so incongruous (which was the point, I suppose). See more videos at his site, Where the Hell is Matt?.

Open Wide...