Anti-Choicers Resign Themselves to Something Vaguely Resembling Compassion

Heavens to Mergatroyd!—it's come to this:

Frustrated by the failure to overturn Roe v. Wade, a growing number of antiabortion pastors, conservative academics and activists are setting aside efforts to outlaw abortion and instead are focusing on building social programs and developing other assistance for pregnant women to reduce the number of abortions.

Some of the activists are actually working with abortion rights advocates to push for legislation in Congress that would provide pregnant women with health care, child care and money for education -- services that could encourage them to continue their pregnancies.
Holy Maude High on Cloud Cooter! Why, it's almost like they've been reading actual facts, like 73% of American abortion-seekers citing "can't afford a baby now" as the reason for the termination, and about one-fourth citing their own health or possible health problems with the fetus as reasons for the termination, owing to concerns including "a lack of prenatal care."

Naturally, this new reality-based and compassionate approach, with its dangerous veer toward the appearance of actually regarding women as real people with agency and needs, is causing a schism within the anti-abortion movement.
Their actions have not come without consequences. [Nicholas Cafardi, former dean of the Duquesne University School of Law and a Catholic canon lawyer] resigned from the board of Franciscan University of Steubenville in Ohio after writing a column supporting Obama and declaring the abortion battle lost. [Douglas W. Kmiec, a Pepperdine University law professor and anti-abortion Catholic who served in the Reagan and George H.W. Bush administrations, but endorsed Obama] has received hate e-mail, and a priest denied him Communion in April. And Denver Archbishop Charles J. Chaput has criticized Kmiec and several of the groups involved, saying they have "undermined the progress pro-lifers have made and provided an excuse for some Catholics to abandon the abortion issue."
Funny how quickly one can go from being a "good Christian" to being demonized like all the rest of us radical feminazis, eh? All it takes is seeing a little bit of gray in the world.

Welcome to the dark side, brothers.

Question: How long do you think it will take before history is rewritten so that the legislation which would "provide pregnant women with health care, child care and money for education -- services that could encourage them to continue their pregnancies" becomes the sole province of the Very Serious Centrist Men (possibly including our new president-elect) who found the "middle ground" on abortion that extremists on both sides couldn't find, despite the reality that feminists have been advocating for exactly these social services for longer than I've been alive?

Don't answer that. It's rhetorical.

I find it fascinating (where fascinating = completely bloody infuriating) that these ideas will probably only now get a hearing at long last because the frame has switched from "things women need, irrespective of their circumstances" to "things that will ensure women make more babies."

Post-feminist, bitchez.

Open Wide...

The Antichrist Comes A-Knockin'

What, Me Worry?Every election year some loon (or group of loons) posits the idea that one or more of the candidates is the Antichrist. They point to signs, like the candidate's stance on gay marriage (Satan likes buttfucking), and abortion (Satan like dead babies), and how close to June 6 they may have been born. New World Order this, Mrs. Baylock that, Rapture, Endtimes, blah blah blah. That's fine. We expect it from nutbags. What we don't expect is for shit like that to be printed in Newsweek.

This week's Newsweek dedicates 666 words* under this headline: Is Obama the Antichrist?

Seriously, Newsweek, this is what you're printing these days? Stories about our President-elect being the supreme evil and bringer of the End of the World? (And if so, why the hell didn't you ask that eight fuckin' years ago?)

Speculating whether Obama has replaced Pope John Paul II and Marilyn Manson as the Antichrist du Jour is all well and good, if you're an internet whacko or The Washington Times, but Newsweek, c'mon, you should know better. And using phrases like "Obama probably isn't the Antichrist" (emphasis mine) in your articles, even if it's attributed to an interviewee, is pretty fuckin' dicey, especially when the whole tone of the article doesn't seem too concerned with countering that idea.


* For the record, that is not true. But if Newsweek can print wildly inflammatory bullshit, so can I.

(Via Steve Benen.)

Open Wide...

First Lady of Change

Our local ABC affiliate aired a special segment Sunday night about Michelle Obama, looking at what having an African-American first lady means for the country and the world, and black women in particular. One of the women interviewed is Kiri Davis, who made the short film A Girl Like Me, which we've previously discussed and which, in part, recreates the 1947 "doll test" used in the Brown v. Board of Ed case. (If you can't view A Girl Like Me at that link, you can also find it here.)

It's a nice segment; definitely worth a look. I was pleased to see the First Ladyship of Michelle Obama tied into more than her being a fashionplate, and more than a cursory mention of what it really means for average women to have prominent WOC role models at the highest levels.

At the same time, it's interesting to see there's still a need to subtly (and not-so-subtly) suggest she won't just be focusing on issues of importance to black women and that it's totally possible for "women of all colors" (i.e. white women) to relate to her, too.

Open Wide...

Hit the lights, hush and it’ll be more better…

Crossposted from AngryBlackBitch.com.

A bitch has been following the consequences of Nebraska’s Safe Haven law with great interest. Safe Haven laws are supposed to protect newborns and infants from unsafe abandonment by shielding parents from legal prosecution should they leave their child at a designated Safe Haven location. Nebraska’s law apparently does not specify an age limit and that has resulted in older children and teens being dropped off at Safe Havens.

The response to this has been fascinating. Some Nebraska lawmakers have accused parents of casually abandoning their children as if selfishness is the only reason a parent would ever utilize a Safe Haven for an older child. The media has frenzied over stories of large families being torn apart and parents driving across the country to deposit their teen at Nebraska emergency rooms.

What is lost is the window into reality that this so-called mistake offers.

Or maybe it isn’t lost.

Maybe some people want that shit to remain in darkness…out of sight and blessedly out of mind.

What they see is a law that needs to be rewritten to clarify the precise age when legal abandonment becomes illegal so parents will no longer be able to abandon older children.

What I see is an example of how society fails to meet the needs of parents, children and families and an opportunity to address that shit.

And that’s an uncomfortable thing for many Americans to confront. After all, state after state has been working feverishly to pass laws and propositions that are allegedly designed to protect families and marriage…children and society. The last thing supporters of all that paper want to hear is that they’ve moved all their troops to the western front of a war being waged in the east.

Hit the lights.

Why oh why examine the real pressures families face…poverty and the fear of hunger, homelessness and the fear of violence, mental health issues and the lack of options and so forth and so on.

Hush!

‘Tis much easier to just turn out the lights…rewrite the law and toss all those cases into a box labeled Not My Fucking Problem.

And it’ll be more better.

Right?

***cue crickets***

Shit.

Open Wide...

The Sod Squad is Coming for You!

My two favorite bloviating fucknecks, Bill O'Reilly and Newt Gingrich, are very, very concerned about the radical queers and their radical allies (see: Cult of the Feminazi Cooter), who form the "gay and secular fascism in this country that wants to impose its will on the rest of us." If you're not panicking about the radical queer onslaught, then you're obviously not paying attention! These radical queers and their radical allies are fixing to take over the entire country and force good, conservative, Christian straight people to get gay-married against their wills and give up their firstborn children to be gayified with their gay-beams of gayitude! THE GAYPOCALYPSE IS COMING!!!



[Full transcript is here.]

I truly adore how O'Reilly keeps trying to tie the protests etc. to "the election," as if this is the natural outgrowth of electing Obama ("See what happens when you elect a radical black Muslim crackhead?"), rather than a response to the passage of Prop 8—that little thing that ripped equality from the hands of a community to which it had been extended at long last.

But even better than that is watching Newt Gingrich expand yet further the boundaries of acceptable conservative religiosity. First, you had to be a WASP to be part of the Moral Majority (no Catholics or darkies allowed), then it was all about the Christian Coalition (as long as you believed in Jesus, you were cool), then it was suddenly the Judeo-Christian tradition (welcome, Joe Lieberman!), and now, amazingly, after a two-term Republican presidency that demonized Muslims and an election in which the implication the Democratic nominee was Muslim was considered an insult, believers in "the historic version of Islam" are welcome to the party, too!

Wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!

If layoffs at Focus on the Family weren't a big enough indicator that the interest in Christian conservative extremism is dwindling, howsabout Newt freaking Gingrich extending a hand of partnership to fundamentalist Muslims? It would be hilarious if it weren't so pathetic, this desperate attempt to cobble to together a conservative alliance from the bottom of every religious barrel. The believers in "traditional religion." Yeah, well, we all know what that means: Vote Republican—we'll protect you from them!

On the ground with the hoi polloi, far away from the lofty luxuriance of billion-dollar defense contracts and insider trading schemes, Republicanism has become nothing but a mafia protection racket, shaking down the ignorant and the bigoted for their votes in exchange for security. Call it The Family Values.

And, like the Cosa Nostra who perfected this scam, the GOP is really the only thing their victims have to fear—broken banks instead of broken kneecaps. So they invent bogeymen to hide behind, peddling hate of them, and then the protection from them, because it's the only thing they've got to offer.

Watch out, America! The Sod Squad is Coming for You!


But hate just ain't selling like it used to.
O'REILLY: All right, so when we come back, I want to talk about the economy, which is frightening everybody. I want to talk about the illegal alien amnesty, and we'll talk about the "In God We Trust," all right. We'll have more with the speaker in a moment.
Socialists, Immigrants, and Atheists—oh my! I almost can't think of anything more pitiable than being a dimestore Joe McCarthy knock-off. Except, of course, being the devotee of a dimestore Joe McCarthy knock-off. It can't be fun going through life burdened with the crushing weight of constant fear and indignation on your back.

I wouldn't know. I've got my pink shoez on already, so bring on the gaypocalypse—I welcome my radical queer overlords!

Open Wide...

Out of Focus

The recession is hurting every segment of the economy. Even the folks in the sanctimony and intolerance distribution business are facing hard times.

Focus on the Family announced this afternoon that 202 jobs will be cut companywide — an estimated 20 percent of its workforce. Initial reports bring the total number of remaining employees to around 950.

[...]

The cutbacks come just weeks after the group pumped more than half a million dollars into the successful effort to pass a gay-marriage ban in California.
I'm trying to work up a little sympathy for these people who are losing their jobs because the company they work for just blew most of their money in an effort to pass an amendment in California that enshrines inequality into the state's constitution.

Nope. I've got nothing.

(Cross-posted.)

Open Wide...

Chicago: Queer Kind of Town

by Shaker Sarah in Chicago

So, what did you do on Saturday?

I was standing outside in downtown Chicago, in high 30's F temps, with light snow falling, shouting and protesting in a country that's not even my own.

Seriously, I know, I'm nuts :)

I submitted a large draft of my dissertation proposal late Friday afternoon, so Saturday midday, I turned up with friends in Daley Plaza for the National Day of Protest, where simultaneously, all across the country, 8.30am HST, 9.30am AST, 10.30am PST, 11.30am MST, 12.30pm CST, and 1.30pm EST, queers and our allies protested against Proposition 8, the bigotry in California, and for our equal rights more generally.

1115081226

1115081243

There were thousands and thousands and thousands of people there ... so many they had to shut down Adams street next to the Plaza, so people wouldn't be driven over by cars. There were about an hour and a half of speeches, yelling, and cheering (and a bit of booing and catcalling at the half-dozen pro-hate douches protesting across from us). Btw, speeches included Catherine DeBuono and her girlfriend Jill Bennett from AfterEllen.com (who I have to say, are SERIOUSLY just as gorgeous in person as they are online).

1115081252a

1115081252

After that hour and a half, there were growing calls more and more for a march, and the organisers said we were going to walk down the Millennium Park (right down where the Loop meets Lake Michigan, surrounded like Central Park is in NYC by insanely tall sky-scrapers).

1115081409

However, just before we got to the entry to the Park, we did a bait-and-switch on the police (sorry guys! but the mounted-police were awesome, and totally on our side, protecting us from traffic), hanging a hard-left, and going off the sidewalks (where the police had forced us to be), filling up the streets, crossing back down through the loop, shutting down traffic, over State Street, down to LaSalle, across Federal Plaza, spilling across back down Randolph, and then turning onto State, shutting down EVERYTHING as thousands and thousands of screaming and chanting queers and allies marched through the city, with people coming out of buildings and clapping, smiling, laughing, giving us the thumbs-up and dancing from their multi-level offices.

1115081421

We continued up State Street onto Upper Wacker Drive (btw, the latest two Batman movies were filmed on Lower Wacker, beneath us ... just for geek-info), along the banks of the Chicago River to Michigan Ave, the 'Magnificant Mile', where we turned north, into the most prestigious shopping district in all of Chicago-land.

1115081514a

At the top of Michigan Ave, a stretch SUV limo stopped, stuck in all the traffic we had brought to a stand-still. And the doors opened, and a newly wed bride and groom, heterosexual couple got out and started dancing with us, hooting and chanting, grabbing banners and yelling in support ... the press corps along with us went nuts with the cameras, and the couple got high-fives, hugs and so many smiles and laughter! They waved as they hopped back into their limo ...

I don't know who you both are, and I guess I'll probably never meet you again ... but to that couple, thank you so much, so incredibly much, for realising how much your wedding at that moment meant, and what it meant to us, and what having you come support us would mean ... just, thank you.

1115081514

So yes, eventually the police worked out what we were doing, and at the end of Michigan Ave they blocked the entire street off with police-cars and individual officers, preventing us from getting on Lake Shore Drive, the express-way running up the lake-front of Chicago, where we would have caused HUGE traffic problems. This, there on the Gold Coast, was where me and my friends peeled off, exhausted, as it was almost 4pm by this time, and ... well, we needed Starbucks ... we are gay, after all :)

But that protest was incredible ... utterly incredible. I've never experienced anything like it. At the same time as people were simply angry ... I mean, quite pissed off ... it was welcoming, and happy (hell, initially the march even had a soundtrack ... we're so gay, lol). And there were over a million people across the country doing this at EXACTLY THE SAME TIME.

A couple of the speakers in the Plaza mentioned that this might be the second Stonewall ... and it may very well be. I've never seen the like. So much support from those that lined the march, people running out of building to join us. Even those stuck in traffic were honking their horns, not in frustration, but in support, as they smiled and laughed.

If this continues, if this motivation moves ... well, the Mormon Church, the Evangelical Organisations, they have woken us, and something that was slowly, progressively happening, yet inevitably, will have turned into a rush, a wave, because you cannot demean us like this, you cannot take our rights away. We have had enough, and we refuse to be quiet and submissive anymore.

Cathy DeBuono said something in her speech ... that we'd gotten used to being tolerated, to the point where it was something we considered our usual, normal, existence ... that people would tolerate our lives, tolerate our families, tolerate our love. So long as we shut up, and didn't want to be whole people in our lives, in our own societies, we would be tolerated, and allowed to have bits and pieces of equality.

No more.

We're done with being tolerated.

And this was organised in a week. Welcome to the 21st Century.

(Cross-posted.)

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime

(This one's for the Canadians in the house...)

Cannonball

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

What is your favorite non-political blog?

Open Wide...

On Labors of Love, Hope, Growing Pains, Gratitude, and Teaspoons

[For what I assume are obvious reasons, this post will stay on top for while; new posts are below.]

Last Wednesday, Iain asked me what I was going to do.

Maybe better than anyone else, and more clearly than I'd ever be able to explain, he knows why I walked away last Sunday not knowing if I'd ever come back. He knows how much Shakesville—not just the blog, but the whole community—means to me and how much of myself I've put into it. And he, with his resolute belief in what this blog tries to accomplish, his magnificent, unwavering belief in me, and his willingness to stand strong with me through some very hard times, has done some pretty stunning teaspoon-wielding of its own to make Shakesville possible. We've both invested a lot here—and he was the first person to suggest some time ago that the safe space I'd created for everyone else was increasingly not a safe space for me.

What started out as a part-time hobby four years ago had become a full-time job—and a full-time job for which I earned very little. Just as there is a "misogyny tax," there is a tax to be free from misogyny and all other forms of bigotry; there's a cost to providing a safe space. Traditional sources for monetizing a blog were not an option: Content-generated ads (like Google Ads) frequently yield ironic advertisements—diet plans on fat acceptance threads, and anti-gay ads on pro-gay threads. BlogAds ad submissions had to be turned down which featured sexualized imagery of women, language that would have broken the commenting rules, or endorsements of companies that were union-busting or bigoted. My earnings were almost totally from freelance writing I do elsewhere, on top of maintaining Shakesville.

Still, it was, as Portly so beautifully described, a labor of love. I like working hard, and working hard at something one believes in is a rare gift.

Nonetheless, there were other costs.

Two famously unmoderated threads—Rape is Hilarious (emphatic trigger warning) and Fat Princess Update—give a glimpse behind the curtain. I get disturbing email. People have come to the door. Iain's and my sense of security is no longer what it was. That's not a small thing for a survivor of sexual assault with post-traumatic stress disorder. It's not a small thing for her partner.

Still, it was worth it. We made adjustments. I gave myself the occasional afternoon off when I needed it. In exchange for the bad stuff, there was this awesome community. After linking to political petitions, within minutes of posting I'd get excited feedback like: "We already got 300 signatures!" Money was raised for charitable causes. People whose pleas for help I posted got the help they needed. Homeless kittens got adopted. This wasn't just a community of like-minded people who shared a space; it was a community of teaspoon-wielding badasses! What cost there was still felt like a reasonable price to pay, given the possibilities.

And I like working hard. Plus, there were all these people who were willing to help. It seemed like every time I was floundering, someone stepped in to provide exactly the help I needed.

When moderating got to be a two-person job years ago, Misty stepped in—she's like a quiet little mouse with the tenacity of a lion, always behind the scenes, fiercely moderating threads and calling me when something gets hairy and she knows I'm offline. And in addition to Shaker Gourmet, she takes care of Shakesville's Facebook page, too, just because she's cool like that.

When blog software moved beyond the basic HTML I'd half-assedly taught myself, Space Cowboy stepped in to provide tech support. He customized the template, tweaks it as necessary, manages Disqus, reviews new technology add-ons—and, aside from everything he does at Shakesville, he helps out Shakers who are themselves bloggers when they have questions.

When I was facing DOS attacks, Mustang Bobby enlisted his brother to help, who donated enormous amounts of his time and energy to try to keep Shakesville on its own server. MB's mom has even offered her support; it's literally a family affair of generosity.

When the election really started to kick into gear, here came this fella called Petulant to send me videos of important stuff as it happened—and when I asked him to become a contributor, he not only became "our video guy" (and generously included a link to Shakesville in his popular YouTube channel), but started giving us the Morning Readings, just for a start.

When moderating became an even bigger job, Deeky volunteered without hesitation—and he is always one of the first to notice when I'm getting completely triggered and send me some utterly silly email to redirect my attention, sometimes there before I even really know I need him.

When I needed someone to talk to who would not be shy about telling me where I was falling short in my communication and give me a fresh perspective, Portly was there on the other end of my phone, with honesty and patience and authentic concern. And a willingness to let me cry and fume until we came out the other side, laughing.

Spudsy? He's been a fuckin' rock for three years. The simplicity of that statement is inversely proportional to the magnitude of its meaning.

When I kept forgetting to do the Amazing Race open threads, Arkades just stepped in without my even having to ask. Bill took on ShakesQuill; Kate became a moderator and gave me her old laptop; Todd's always there for anything I need; Kenny Blogginz went to see HRC with me; Nightshift's there with the legal analysis and Quixote with the scientific explanation; Chet did book reviews because I suck at them and he's good; Shark-fu is quick with a word of support; Phil Barron is always a good friend—and, with his lovely wife M, made me feel welcome in their home not long ago for a wonderfully restorative evening. All the contributors make Shakesville better with their amazing writing and insight and humor—and many of them are always willing to take on an extra post or two to lighten my load, when they get one of my "Want this one?" emails.

On plenty of occasions, non-contributor Shakers stepped in to help in one way or another, too. A sizable contribution from Shaker Rehmeyer during a particularly rough patch quite literally made it possible for Shakes Manor, no less Shakesville, to keep going. Shaker rrp's beautiful forthrightness and gracious patience with me, when I've been working through my thoughts on anything from privilege to blog philosophy, has been invaluable. Shakers Kathy and Bill in Birmingham have been generous in more ways than I can say. Countless Shakers piped up with advice and information when Iain was diagnosed with stinkabetes. There were many moments when a well-timed email from a Shaker just saying thanks totally lifted my spirits. Shaker Rana's patient explanations; Shaker Betty Boondoggle's hilarious trollsmacking. I could go on and on…

As much work as I put in, I wasn't doing it on my own. And whatever costs there were to be at the helm of this community, it was still worth it—in no small part because when I needed something to keep going, and asked for it, it was given. There was sort of this unspoken agreement that what I got in return for doing the lion's share was the agreement to not wrestle with me when I was at the end of my tether. There was a time when I could say, "Enough with the petty arguments about X; I've had it," and that would be that.

A few months ago, that dynamic changed.

Over the course of the election, the average readership of Shakesville more than doubled—even as it weathered flouncing departures from people who didn't like "all the feminism" that they seemed to think had mysteriously infiltrated the blog out of nowhere, despite its proprietor and name, people who thought I was a Catholic-hater, people who were pissed I wouldn't allow lectures on how other Shakers should vote, people who thought I was in the tank for Clinton, people who thought I was in the tank for Obama, people who thought I was in the tank for (this still makes me choke) John McCain.

With growth comes growing pains—and it was a brutal election season for all of us, anyway. It wasn't just Iain and me who were spun sideways by the Donohue mess right at its start; many members of the community were deeply upset by it, too. But we rallied. And we rallied again, and again, when the primaries got tougher, and tougher. I worked my ass off to be fair, and got knocked from every side.

And when it was over and I was ready to rally…it didn't happen.

Please, I said. Please. Please. Please. Please. Please. Please. Please. Please. Please.

I felt crushed beneath negativity—not legitimate criticism about specific failures, but generalized acrimony. I started feeling anxious about posting anything remotely celebratory or sanguine—precisely the things I need to hang onto to do this job day in and day out, a job which is frequently dispiriting, triggering, and grim. I couldn't post something like this in my own space anymore, because I could no longer bear the inevitable: Someone would make a snarky comment about hearing funeral dirges or something equally dismissive within about three comments, immediately hijacking the thread to accommodate their need to express residual anger (even at the expense of others' need to move beyond the acridity of the primaries). That's not criticism, which will never be forbidden in this space. That's using the comments threads to maintain a personal grudge.

It wasn't that I had forgotten the shit that went down in the primary; it wasn't that it didn't matter. It's that there wasn't any space to rally anymore. It's that progress requires looking forward—and, at a progressive blog where teaspooning the ocean is the goddamned theme, threads must be productive. Specific criticisms can be productive; reflexively dousing any display of the unbridled (but never blind) optimism that fuels progressivism with pronouncements of lingering animosity and low expectations is not productive. Worse yet, it's not progressive.

And that runs counter to the objectives of this blog its inception.

I've never told anyone how they should feel, and I wouldn't begin to start. I still feel shitty and scared and conflicted and pissed about what has happened and what may come—and I know I'm not alone. But I was also not alone in needing to find a balance between the shitty and scared and conflicted and pissed, and the tenuous, fragile hope that that's not all there is, that this election was about way more than one man, that beyond the doubt and suspicion and disappointment there was the possibility of some real progress, too.

I tried to refocus away from Obama and onto the people for whom this election mattered, the people who care about progressive ideals (even when Obama doesn't), but it kept coming back over and over and over to him and his very real flaws, which wasn't moving us forward but holding us back.

It was intensely discouraging. That I kept trying to make room for those of us who wanted and needed to express hopefulness, the boundaries of which were continually disrespected by those who don't share the desire, began to take its toll.

I tried it once more. Please.

The answer was no.

I realized that the unspoken agreement we'd once had, where I got what I needed to carry on, had been broken. And that can't be fixed. The community is too big, too diverse, with too many competing interests. It was going to be a struggle, much more than before, to maintain the spirit of the blog—and I could see I was often going to have to do it in an atmosphere that did not feel like a safe space for me. Labor, sans love.

When I left last Sunday, I really didn't know if I was going to be able to do it anymore.

Portly talked to me at length about the value of my work and viewing my labor of love as the job it has really become and seeking remuneration for it. I couldn't get past feeling like asking for regular donations to carry on was somehow holding the blog hostage. It was, I now see, representative of how much I felt I owed my labor to the community and devalued my own work that asking to be paid for it felt like committing extortion. It was only after she requested I do my "day in the life list" (the trickster) that I truly embraced the scope and worth of what I do.

I began to consider that I could do this if it's a labor of love and a job with monetary value, so I am never left feeling again as though I'm doing this unsupported, as though I'm doing it for nothing, as though Iain is carrying a truly unfair share of the burden—and so I'm never crushed under the weight of wondering whether I can continue financially and wondering whether I can continue emotionally at the same time.

I still didn't know how to ask. I wasn't sure if I had the wherewithal to endure the inevitable "get a real job, you fucking loser" comments that solicitations for donations always evoke. Emotional nadir. I hid in a holding pattern.

Last Wednesday, Iain asked me what I was going to do.

I told him, after much consideration, that I would let the community decide if they wanted me to go on, see if they'd carve out a space for me to keep managing and nurturing the space in a way that would work for me. If Shakesville makes the space for me on their own, I said, it's just not some random thing I asked for and they gave without understanding its significance; they will design it and it will be something they're able to sustain. He said, sincerely but so surprised it made me laugh, "That's really wise." In truth, I just wasn't sure what else to do.

It's poetic, really, that it was Petulant who first tried to make a space for me at Shakesville to come back—because I have rejected his resignation no fewer than three dozen times. "It's just a bad day, Pet. You'll carry on." And he does.

And, because I can take a hint even when it isn't delivered with a (loving) sledgehammer, so will I.

Thank you, Shakers, for giving me the space over the past week to just be away—and for making a space for me to come back to. Thank you for recognizing the value of my work. Thank you for your donations and words of support, for your commitment to this safe space, for your expressions of what it means to you, for your encouragement, for your teaspoons. I am pleased and honored that you want me to carry on. I am relieved and inspired that you'll fight for this progressive community, too.

I feel really overwhelmed, and I don't even know if this post makes any sense. If it doesn't, all that matters is this: Thank you. Teaspoons ahoy.

o.oP

Open Wide...

The Pink Petulance and Nana

I promise I'll get back to posting more regularly tomorrow; today I'm still working through loads of email and comments. (And thank you for all of the lovely emails you've sent and comments you've left! Truly—I don't even know what to say.)

In the meantime, please enjoy this picture that Mama Shakes recently scanned and sent to me of The Pink Petulance and her nana, who was being made to wear a book on her head, circa Christmas 1976.


I loved my nana (who's made the briefest of cameos here and here) to itty bitty pieces. She lived in the same house in Queens from the time she was 5 years old until a few months before she died in her 70s; she smoked like a chimney (which eventually killed her), always drank the same whiskey (Dewar's), and was intensely witty.

Once, she was visiting us in Indiana for the holidays (when I was about 13), and we saw an advert for an upcoming episode of Geraldo—back when he was a daytime talk show scandalmonger, before he became the highly reputable journalist for Fox News that he is today. It was one of those that announced the topic and requested guests: "Prostitute Grannies! If you want your grandma to stop selling her body on the street, call 1-800…"

I told my nana (who was, by the way, a secretary) that I was going to call, because I was tired of her wild whoring.

She took a long drag, exhaled with a raised eyebrow, pointed at me with her cigarette, and said without missing a beat: "Don't mess with my livelihood."

I collapsed into a fit giggles. And possibly put a book on her head.

Open Wide...

Monday Blogaround

hey your gay blogaround

Recommended Reading:

Plain(s)Feminist: Winona LaDuke's House Burned Down: Here is How to Help

Marcella: Colleges Can No Longer Impose Gag Orders on Rape Victims

Martha Nussbaum: The President-Elect and India

Coturnix: Will there be new communication channels in the Obama administration?

Veronica: Summers Off the Shortlist

Tracey: The Implications of Gendered Lube

Leave your links in comments...

Open Wide...

Daily Kitteh



No.



And more no.

Open Wide...

Three Slices of Life

by Shaker TWoP Fan

I have Jugular Lymphatic Obstruction Sequence.

Basically, that means I have extra skin on me neck (as in, I have a neck like a very bulky football player) and lots of swelling in my hands and feet and my lymph nodes don't always work as planned.

Awhile ago, I became interested in neck surgery, of the cosmetic variety. This is my story of that journey.

Part One.

I have no idea how to start because no one has ever really asked me how I felt about it or what I think about it. It just gets overlooked, ignored. Most of my close friends and family just stopped talking about it after initial discussions; I've always been the one to bring it up.

I've always been afraid to talk about how I feel about it because once I put it out there, I don't think I'll be able to put it back—and then what? What if I don't/can't get the surgery and I can't stop imagining the possibilities? What if I tell my family how I feel and they feel sorry for me, making it worse than it is? Or what if they feel guilty, or responsible, like they didn't work hard enough to reassure me or to protect me? Friends always seem vaguely uncomfortable around the topic, as though it's not polite to mention someone's 'condition' in front of them, even if I am the one bringing it up.

This is how I feel about it.

I am so excited I can't breathe. I am carried away on it, like a perfect daydream. And I know that's all it is, but I can't help it. It's like The Fantasy of Being Thin. The Fantasy of Being Thin-Necked. I'll be more attractive. Clothes will fit better. I'll look skinnier. My hair will look good no matter how I do it. I'll get to wear my hair up! In public! I'll want to wear make-up, everyday. I'll have better style, be more confident, have more friends. I will have the life I was meant to have.

I am terrified. What if something goes wrong? What if no one notices? What if I get all excited for my consult and it doesn't go through? What if I am disappointing people by altering my body? What if I am setting a bad example for my daughter? What if I don't look any different?

I've always thought that I what I wanted most was to be normal. The thing is, in everything I've done, normal just hasn't worked for me. I'm not 'normal', I'm me and it works for me. I'm happier being different, strange, odd, weird than I ever was when I was pretending to be normal. So what would looking normal do to me?

Part Two.

Turns out I'll never find out.

The consultation was today. My husband and I met with Dr. X and I was so nervous I thought I was going to throw up. He took several photos of my neck from different angles examined my neck and then started discussing what he thought he could do. Which turned out to be less than I had hoped. I have muscles in my neck that are in the way of the excess skin, so he can't remove enough to make my neck look, in his words, 'normal'. What he can do is get me 'marginally closer to normality'. My 'deformity' is permanent. He can remove what will amount to maybe half an inch of skin on each side of my neck, which isn't enough for a major difference. I wouldn't feel differently about tank tops or wearing my hair up and I'd still have to buy extra long necklaces.

I was still considering it until he mentioned that it would have to be at least three different surgeries, each with separate check ups, in the span of a year. And he 'wasn't sure what he'd charge for that, but probably $4,000-5,000' each. With added expenses of visits and travel time and recovery time, etc. he'd charge me the new Kia that I want, for minimal results.

I didn't cry until I got to the car. I can't spend that kind of money on multiple surgeries for results that wouldn't substantially change anything. That doesn't mean I'm not grieving for what I feel like I've lost, though.

The worst part was losing that fantasy described earlier. Now it's really and truly over and I have to accept it.

The second worst part? Hearing someone describe me as deformed and not normal. All the things I think when I feel my worst, this guy just said, no hesitation. I know it's his job, but he can't say 'problem area' or 'issue' or 'concern'? No bedside manner this one.

Part Three.

I spend my day off mourning my loss of normalcy. And Friday? I'm wearing my hair in a ponytail, and I better not hear one word about it.

Open Wide...

Quote of the Day

"I am very proud. I am proud to be a woman, I'm proud to be a black woman, and I'm proud to be gay. And I love you all. Now let's go get our damn equal rights!"—Wanda Sykes, coming out at the Las Vegas Prop 8 protest and announcing she and her wife were married in California in October. (Via.)

I didn't think I could love her even more after she called herself a feminist on The Tonight Show; I was wrong.

Open Wide...

Of Horses and Teaspoons

by Shaker Roramich

So Liss and I recently bonded over "OMG HORSES!1!!" Turns out she's still a major horse person and I went through that stage as a kid: you know the one. Reading books over and over – Misty of Chinoteague, The Black Stallion, Black Beauty, and any other horse books I could get my hands on – drawing horses, spotting ponies from the car on trips, learning the names of all the breeds, and longing to ride like the wind. I actually did get to ride a horse a few times as a kid, but not very often. If I'd been growing up today, I might have had my interest channeled into those hideous pink and purple "My Little Pony" plastic monstrosities that include a hairbrush (looks nothing like a real curry comb!) to "properly" guide my gender development, but my family didn't have money for stuff like that (one of the few advantages of a working class childhood!). So I was left with books, most of them library books, but also a few of my own.

One in particular stands out – a spectacularly illustrated and wonderfully informative book titled Album of Horses by Marguerite Henry. Henry wrote Misty of Chincoteage and 58 other published books, publishing her first story at the age of eleven. I don't remember what happened to my hardcover copy, but last summer I found a soft cover version in a used bookstore, and bought it for my nearly 5-year old daughter.

The Album of Horses (1951) has entries for 25 major breeds, with factual information woven into a story about each one. My favorites were the pure white Lippizans, because, as I confessed to Liss, they combined "OMG HORSES" with "OMG ballet!!11!!" The breed goes back to 1565 and Emperor Maximilian II of Austria, who established the breed by crossing Spanish mares with Arabian stallions. Lippizan riders and horses go through arduous training over many years, and the performance of horse and rider includes precise and complex patterns of steps, statue-still poses and stunning leaps, all set to music (see, I told you it combined ballet!).

What I didn't remember was that Henry's entry for Lippizan, which describes the training and performing of the horse and rider, is written entirely in "generic" he. I commonly correct written text that is intended to be "generic" when I read to my daughter, as I wage my one-woman war against the tyranny of incorrect and inaccurate language. What I never knew as a child, however, was that at the time Henry was writing her Album, and, indeed, for the 430 years of the school where future riders of this special breed have trained for their amazing performances, no woman had ever been allowed to ride Lippizans.

Although I can't vouch for the fantasy that some enterprising woman might have, at some time over the centuries, ventured into training in male costume (just dreaming, no facts), a couple weeks ago (10/27) the Boston Globe's photo blog, "The Big Picture," published a picture of a woman training in the Spanish Riding School in Vienna, riding a Lippizan.

In a blub moment, I was able to tell my daughter that FINALLY women were allowed to train to dance with the elegant white horses, and when I corrected the text from Henry as I read to her, it wasn't just an abstract ideal about the uses of language, but did, in fact, more accurately reflect the state of the world: Women, maybe even my daughter, can now grow up to ride the Lippizans. Of course, we always COULD, but now the societal barrier to such an accomplishment has finally come down. And I am reminded anew of why I do the work I do, why teaspoons matter so much, every single day in every conceivable domain of human endeavor. Because, however incremental, change does come. And in this case, it only took four centuries.

Open Wide...

Making a Family

Even as Floridians rallied this weekend for the rights for same-sex couples to marry, a trial has been going on in Miami-Dade County to determine if a gay couple can adopt children.

In a one-week trial peppered with words like ''null hypothesis,'' ''central limit theorem'' and ''Pearson correlation,'' a half-dozen experts in psychology, epidemiology, sociology and family studies presented starkly different views on whether gay men and women can be as good at parenting as straight people. The trial, which ran Oct. 1-6, was closed to the public, but The Miami Herald has obtained a transcript of the testimony.

Florida law bans gays from adopting. Valerie J. Martin, a Florida assistant attorney general who defended the statute, said same-sex couples are at far greater risk of many social ills, and ''putting children who are already at risk into such a household would increase the stressors that these children already experience as a result of their placement in foster care.''

Countered Leslie Cooper, an attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union who represents the foster father: ''We heard, over the course of this trial, heaps and heaps of scientific evidence about gay parents and gay people. There is absolutely no reasonable scientific dispute on the subject of whether children who are raised by gay parents are disadvantaged in any way.''

The judge's ruling will determine whether a 4-year-old boy and his 8-year-old brother can be adopted by Frank Gill, the North Miami foster parent who has raised the boys for four years, and his partner. Lederman said she will decide on the adoption later this month.

Florida is the only state that bans all gay people from adopting. This fall, a Circuit Court judge in Key West declared Florida's ban unconstitutional, although the decision is unlikely to hold much sway because it was not appealed to a higher court. Since the state is fighting Gill's attempt to adopt the two boys, a decision by Lederman to declare the law unconstitutional would be of far greater consequence.

Most likely, the case will ultimately be decided by the Third District Court of Appeal or the Florida Supreme Court.
To bolster its case, the state brought in a crew of experts in child psychology.
At trial, the state's defense of the adoption law rested on the shoulders of two scholars -- George A. Rekers, a retired professor from the University of South Carolina, who taught neuropsychiatry and behavioral science, and Walter R. Schumm, an assistant professor of family studies at Kansas State University.

Rekers and Schumm argued that lawmakers were justified in excluding gay people from adoption because research shows that they are at greater risk of developing a host of impairments that can harm children, such as mental illness, alcohol or drug abuse, and the virus that causes AIDS.

Schumm testified that, based on research involving 2,847 children, the children of gay men and lesbians are far more likely to also become gay -- about 19 percent of children raised by gay parents, compared with 4 percent of children with straight parents.

Schumm said he was also concerned by a study that said that 47 percent of gay teenagers had seriously considered suicide, and that 36 percent had attempted it. ''If a child is gay, lesbian or bisexual, this is, in some sense, a life-threatening issue,'' he said.

Gay men and lesbians have two to four times the likelihood of suffering from major depression, anxiety or substance abuse, based on several national studies, Rekers testified. Gay men, he said, are four times more likely than straight men to attempt suicide.
However, under cross examination, it turns out that these experts have an agenda. Yep, you guessed it: they're shills for the Religious Reich.
Under cross-examination, Rekers, who also has a theology degree, acknowledged that he taught and practiced psychology from a Christian perspective, and had written books condemning social science that doesn't recognize ''the moral laws of God.''

''To search for truth about homosexuality in psychology and psychiatry, while ignoring God, will result in futile and foolish speculations,'' Rekers wrote in a 1982 book.

In 2003, Schumm also said in a scholarly article that social science could be used to spread the word of God. ''With respect to integration of faith and research, I have been trying to use statistics to highlight the truth of the Scripture,'' he wrote.

One of Gill's experts, Susan D. Cochran, a professor of epidemiology and statistics at UCLA, accused Schumm of cooking some of the data he used to bolster his argument. ''This is taught in first-year statistics,'' Cochran testified. ''I was surprised he would do that.''

And one of Gill's attorneys, James Esseks, criticized Rekers for relying on the scholarly work of Paul Cameron, chairman of the Family Research Institute, who was dropped from the American Psychological Association in 1983 after he declined to cooperate with an investigation into whether he had distorted research on gay people.
Is it any wonder that gay people feel marginalized by society when you have people like Mr. Rekers and an entire industry of radio and TV preachers, not to mention a core of the base of a major political party, doing everything they possibly can to reduce you second class citizenship and use you as a piñata for all the perceived ills in the world? Even if you accept the numbers about the higher incidences of drug and alcohol abuse, depression and suicide in the LGBTQ community -- and I find those numbers highly suspect anyway -- don't you think that the vituperation directed at the LGBTQ community from these self-appointed ministers of faux-morality might have something to do with it?

Perhaps if the fundamentalists followed their prophet and preached a little more tolerance and support for a family regardless of how its formed, and perhaps if the state of Florida joined the 20th century and removed the Nuremberg-style law that singles out gays as pariahs when it comes to adoption, those of us in the LGBTQ community might feel more like we actually belong to society and not try to escape from the hatred, prejudice, and the little everyday reminders that we don't count. People like Frank Gill are heroes for fighting the intolerance, but more importantly, they are miracle workers for the simple act of raising a child in a loving and giving home. And that's really the most important thing.

(Cross-posted.)

Open Wide...

RIP: Mitch Mitchell


I apologize for being a few days late with this, but I couldn't let this event pass without mention.

Every musician has influences, those that came before them who exhibited a certain mastery of their instrument. While there are a few different drummers whose styles I've drawn from, there were always two at the top of the heap: Keith Moon and Mitch Mitchell. Both of them were generally in the same sphere for me. They both took drumming into a more improvised lead role, as opposed to just being the basic back beat of the rhythm to support the lead instrument(s). While Keith's style was rooted in plain insanity, Mitch was rooted in jazz techniques.

Mitch's performances on Hendrix's debut album are simply awe-inspiring. That album was one, in particular, that I listened to repeatedly while trying to improve on the drums. I couldn't possibly be more grateful for all of his great contributions to the music we've enjoyed for such a long time. I'm sorry that I missed the chance to see him recently on the Experience Hendrix tour.

I liked his description of the first jam session with Jimi and Noel Redding:
"We did some Chuck Berry and took it from there," Mitchell told the newspaper. "I suppose it worked."
Perhaps there's some consolation in the fact that the band's back together now. Thunder just got louder.

Open Wide...

Caption This Photo



Ace the crown, or deal with permanent facial scars. Your choice.

(via CuteOverload)

Open Wide...

Autumn

A quiet respite on an autumn evening.


Music by George Winston

Open Wide...