From the Mailbag

I got a typical Nigerian scam e-mail last night:

From: Mrs. Cana Williams [mailto:cana.williams@rocketmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2008 3:16 AM
To: mustangbobby [at] barkbarkwoofwoof [dot] com
Subject: Investment Assistance

Attention Sir,

My name is Mrs. Cana Williams, l am writing you from UK. l am a South African citizen. With all due respects, your info was reliably introduced to me. I will like to invest in your country but I don't know you very well or anybody that will be willing to help me if l should be able to come over there, that is my reason of contacting you to know if you will be of assistance.

Do you have investment experience, what areas are you personally suggesting?. I want to invest in a profitable business in your country. My money is available in Europe. l want to invest this money in Asia or Europe. If you can handle it then let me know so that we shall plan/discuss how to move the money to you in your country. 10% of the total funds is yours for your assistance. (Non-negotiable)

Waiting to hear from you for further information.

Best regards,
Mrs. Cana Williams
I drafted a reply:
Dear Mrs. Williams:

I suggest you contact Mr. Henry Paulson. He can be reached at http://www.ustreas.gov/

Good luck.

Mustang Bobby
Anything I can do to help a country in need.

Open Wide...

The Virtual Pub Is Open



TFIF, Shakers!

Belly up to the bar,
and name your poison!

Open Wide...

Sophie Discovers Teh Internetz



"Hello, Shakesville."



Meta Kitteh.



"I likes da series of tubes."

Open Wide...

No Champagne, No Cigars, Just a Big Shrug

by ShakerTS

I follow the US markets on a daily basis. It's not my main job, but rather a hobby I've picked up over the past 8 years. And, while I thought everything was making sense earlier this week, I'm confused about Wall Street's reaction to the final act in this week's 'bailout' performance.

Maybe I'm missing something. But here's what I've seen:

On Monday, the first bailout bill failed to pass the House. The DJIA was down around 200 points for the day at that point, but the announcement of the defeat sent it over a cliff, tumbling nearly 800 points overall.

On Tuesday, it gained back a good portion of that loss (a solid 500 points) to close around 10,850—very close to the level it was hovering at prior to Monday's announcement. The Dow remained near that level (remember, this is nearly 200 points below Monday's open) for most of Wednesday. The Senate, of course, passed a 'sweetened' revision that evening.

Thursday (yesterday) was another march downward, even as the pundits were issuing statements reflecting growing confidence this new and improved bill would pass the House. The Dow closed around 10,500—off a good 300 points for the day.

And that brings us to today. Friday. Wall Street's salvation finally arrives as the House approves the bailout package. Angels sing as the chorus of Handel's Messiah reverberates throughout the trading pits, and the markets explode into the stratosphere.

Except—that's not what's happened today. Far from it.

Moments ago, the Dow closed nearly 160 points down at 10,326. For those of you playing along at home, the absolute rock-bottom, fear-induced low after Monday's failure announcement was 10,266.

On Monday, the world was ending. Horsemen of the Apocalypse were scheduled to appear. Dogs and cats living together. And the Dow just closed 60 points away from that catastrophic event low.

Zzuhhh??

Something doesn't smell right. But then again, I've only been at this for a few years. And I'm sure the talking heads on CNBC will come up with many plausible reasons the market tanked after its vital $700 billion cash infusion and why I should not buy all the gold I can get my hands on.

So no need to freak out, America. I'm sure come Monday, everything will be fine.

Open Wide...

Not Breaking News

Hillary Clinton is all class.

Meanwhile, John McCain is all ass:


I'm very honored and I'm very touched. My friends, I've had hundreds of town hall meetings around this country for many, many years, and I've got to say, thanks to you, and to you, and to you, and to you, this is one of the more—one of the more impactful and emotional town hall meetings I've ever had. Maybe it's because it's a women's town hall. [laughs]
Take his wife…please.

Open Wide...

Truly, I Can't Imagine Why McCain Is Losing

Old flame cited as part of McCain's Latin experience:

Speaking at an Americas Conference panel discussion Friday on the next U.S. president's Latin American policy, McCain advisor Richard Fontaine started out by mentioning an old Brazilian flame of McCain's, who recently emerged in the press.

"Talking a little about his personal experience, he was famously born in Panama and has traveled all over the hemisphere for many years." Fontaine said. "In fact, I saw, I guess it was last week, that his old girlfriend in Brazil has been found from his early days when he was in the Navy and was interviewed. She's a somewhat older woman now than she was then, but it sorta speaks to the long experience he has had in the region -- in the most positive terms."
If making out with a Brazilian half a century ago qualifies as foreign policy experience, marrying a Brit must make me next in line to be Queen of England! Woot!

(By the way, I love how he has to note she's "somewhat older…than she was then." Really?! You mean women age? Fascinating!)
Asked afterward about whether he was suggesting that McCain's fling with a Latin hottie counted as Latin America foreign policy experience, Fontaine said: "The only thing I was trying to convey was that his experience goes back a long way," Fontaine said. "He was born in Panama, which illustrates a lifetime spent in Latin America."
Born in Panama = a lifetime spent in Latin America? Um, okay. And that makes sense how, exactly…?
"He has known a lot of people. The thing about the Brazilian girlfriend was in his first memoir, and it stuck in my brain. Look at the two candidates and contrast his extensive experience. That's the only point I was trying to make."
Good point. Can someone ask Obama if he's ever screwed around with an Asian?

You really can't make this stuff up.

Open Wide...

Shaker Gourmet: Lentil Salad

How about some deliciousness for a Friday afternoon? This recipe comes from Shaker Rachel:

Lentil Salad

1 c. little black or green lentils (Puy are nice if you can find them)
2 bay leaves
3 cloves garlic, quartered

Accompaniments:
3 Tbsp. olive oil
a heap of onion or shallots, thinly sliced (the more the better)
another 5 cloves of garlic, sliced (more to taste)
1 red bell pepper or 2-3 roasted piquillo peppers, sliced
sherry or wine to deglaze pan

Dressing:
1/4 c. pitted black olives
more olive oil
sherry vinegar or wine vinegar to taste
grainy brown mustard to taste
black pepper to taste
1 tsp. thyme leaves

Rinse the lentils and pick out any stones. Cover the lentils, bay leaves, and 3 quartered garlic cloves with water and bring to simmer. The lentils will probably take about 20 minutes to cook, but test one after 15 minutes. You want them tender but not falling apart.

Meanwhile, cook the onion or shallots in olive oil in a heavy-bottomed pan. When they have started to brown nicely, add the sliced garlic. Now would also be a good time to add the bell pepper. (If you're using roasted peppers instead, add them at the end; they don't need any more cooking.) Add sherry or wine as needed to keep the good stuff from sticking to the bottom of the pan.

Drain the lentils when they are done. Remove the bay leaves. (You can take out the sodden garlic cloves if you want, but I don't stand on ceremony.) Transfer to a large salad bowl.

When the onions, etc. are caramelized, tip them into the salad bowl with the lentils.

To make the dressing, pulverize the olives in a small food processor with olive oil to make a paste. Add to the salad bowl and stir to coat. Mix in vinegar, mustard, pepper, and thyme.
Rachel notes: "It's especially nice with crusty bread and an assertive bitter green salad, or used to stuff tomatoes. My boyfriend and I get four servings out of this, and it is better the second day."

If you'd like to participate in Shaker Gourmet, email me (include a blog link!) at: shakergourmet (at) gmail.com

Open Wide...

More Friday Cat Blogging

...from Chez Cowboy!



Moon: "Oh hai! I just upgraded ur router!"



Feather: "I'm a cute fuzzball with far out whiskers, and I know it."

Open Wide...

Quote of the Day

I'm sure I'm not the only male in America who, when Palin dropped her first wink, sat up a little straighter on the couch and said, "Hey, I think she just winked at me." And her smile. By the end, when she clearly knew she was doing well, it was so sparkling it was almost mesmerizing. It sent little starbursts through the screen and ricocheting around the living rooms of America. - Rich Lowry in the National Review.

I may vomit. - Sheridan Whiteside in The Man Who Came to Dinner.

Open Wide...

Nothing Up My Sleeve

I'm glad I'm not the only person that noticed this last night.

For Sarah Palin, last night’s debate was an open-book exam. She spent much of the evening methodically reading and rehearsing answers from "carefully scripted talking points." Palin's notes were largely hidden from plain view, resting behind the lectern where she stood.

Because the cable and network television stations did not show a split screen of the debate, most viewers could not see that, during Joe Biden's answers, Palin spent almost all her time looking down and studiously reading her notes. But viewers did see that when Palin delivered her answers, she would repeatedly glance down to check her talking points.
I didn't have the benefit of viewing the debate with a splitscreen, so I was very interested to watch the video at the link. And I'm sorry, you don't get that garbled when responding to spontaneous questions unless you're trying to mangle your prescripted answers to fit them.

I was speaking to a friend on the phone during the debate last night, and she mentioned that she thought she saw a "Bush bulge." I was skeptical, but then a little later, I found myself saying "What the heck is that in her ear?"

Apparently, I wasn't the only person wondering this. And no, I'm not suggesting that the photo proves that Palin was wired, but I know I saw something. HDTV certainly does make watching these things more interesting. Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go make tinfoil hats.

Open Wide...

It's a Boy('s Club)!


Break out the celebratory cigars: The House just gave birth to a bouncing $700 billion bailout bill. And President Bush will slap its ass later today.

Open Wide...

A Postcard to American Conservatives from Bavaria

by Shaker Silvia

There was an earthquake last sunday.

You might have missed it.

Not really your fault, since it was an political earthquake and happened in Bavaria.

You might have heard of Bavaria—it's a state within the Federal Republic of Germany, renowned for its beer, the huuuge party around said beer known to insiders as Octoberfest, dirndl, lederhosn, Catholicism...

Bavaria is a lot like Texas. Ruled by fundamental Christians, speaking a dialect no one else in the union understands, half-serious threatening to leave said union, very politically conservative, and very much in love with their traditions around guns and hunting.

Some of that changed on Sunday. That's the earthquake I've been talking about. In the last election for the unicameral leglislature, in 2003, the Christian Social Party (CSU) got 60% of the vote—record even for them. In the fifty years since its foundation, the CSU never, ever had had less than 50% of the vote.

Until last sunday. They tanked. They now stand at 43%.

So what happened? How did it come to this?

Basically, it comes down to stupidity—on their part. Following a political agenda that hurt their constituents. Going back on decisions. Abandoning the Über-Vater Stoiber a year before the election and replacing him with two unremarkable, boring, and incompetent people. Plain insulting the voters during the election campaign. (Sound familiar?)

A few examples:

In early 2008, the CSU (it was the ruling party then and did have the majority for constitutional change at that time) decided to do something for the protection of non-smokers in public spaces. And they didn't implement something half-assed, they decided to go all the way.

No smoking in restaurant, pubs, nightclubs—if it's interiors and public space, no smoking allowed.

That also includes the marquees during fairs—such as the Octoberfest, which is only the biggest of them all. (This being a Catholic country with a thousand-year tradition of beer brewing, there is always a fair on any given Sunday somewhere in the state from early March to early November to celebrate the patron of a curch, a clerical holiday, the anniversary of the hunting club, or the auxiliary fire brigade ...)

Now, the CSU always paint themselves as protecting traditions and folk customs and the little man on the land—if it sounds familiar, that's because it is universal conservative-speak. And the one thing being done in marquees during fairs besides heavy drinking, ingesting huge amounts of fatty food, and singing along to the music is smoking—cigarettes, cigars, pipes. Huuuge part of the revered "Bavarian Customs TM".

So essentially, the CSU had killed off one important part of Bavarian tradition and endangered another: little pubs at the corner. Little pubs that do not have the space for a designated smoker's room and thus lost a lot of their customers thanks to that law. Some pubs even had to close because the law!

The outrage was great, and the CSU repented. Sort of. Seeing as marquees weren't permanent structures they were excempt from the law. Or some such—the excuse they found was really inane. As for the little pubs or restaurants—most became smoker's clubs. You could still smoke in a pub, if it was a closed session, so the pubs became club homes. Others just plain ignored the law. As did the Bavarian government—they opted to not enforce that law.

Overall it was a pretty embarassing episode for the CSU—lost them a lot of their constituents and earned them a lot of ridicule.

Other example of stupid policy decisions: the milk fight. Short version: farmers felt they were being fleeced of their money by the big dairies and went on strike. The CSU didn't really bother to get involved and as a result lost 40% of the vote of the farmers—a profession that had always voted for them (In 2003, around 95% of all farmers voted CSU).

Then there was the de-throning of Über-Vater Edmund Stoiber. Since 1993 he had been head of the Bavarian state and since 1998 chairmain of the CSU. He was the face you associated with the CSU. Renowned for his compelling speeches—heavily compounding on traditional beliefs and images, riddled with äähs and long pauses. In 2002 he ran as candidate for German chancellor against Gerhard Schröder—which incidentally ensured Schröder with another term of office and a new high for the social democratic party SPD. He pressed through changes and projects that blew up in the faces of his successors—Günther Beckstein and Erwin Huber.

Beckstein became Ministerpräsident of Bavaria in Oktober 2007, Huber chairman of the CSU. Those two really put on a show in the one year of their service. Not coordinating press conferences or policy, generally giving the impression of incapability and utter stupidity. Incidentally, neither of them had been prepared for their new office, after Stoiber was de-throned quite suddenly, they came to power as the virgin to the baby. (Bavarian Proverb: Wie die Jungfrau zum Kind; i.e: through no acting on their part and utterly unprepared.)

Beckstein had been minister of the interior and had advocated policy that makes Republicans look tame in comparison. Online search of your computer? Check. Planting of a Trojan that would spy on you? Check. Video surveillance everywhere? Check. Biometric data on your passport/personal ID? Check. Using the German Army for police work on German territory (Something that's been outlawed by the constitution, and for good reason? Check.

In office, he became famous for anouncing that one could still drive after two maß of beer (that's 2 litres, about half a gallon of beer—Bavarian beer which comes at 11 to 16% of alcohol compared to American style lager at 4-6%).

Erwin Huber had been minister of finances and as such a member of the board of the BayernLB, the Bavarian Housebank. The BayernLB suffered heavy losses due to the global financial crisis, to save the bank bailout had to be payed and Huber suffered heavy criticism.

Some projects initiated by Stoiber blew up in their faces, which really wasn't their fault, but nontheless added to the general impression of incompetence. One prestige project, the Transrapid, from Munich Central Station to the airport, Stoibers' pet-project, proved to be to expensive and had to be abandoned. Huber and Beckstein were blamed for not getting the federal government to cough up more money and generally ruining the Über-Vater's parting gift.

Stoiber had pushed through a school reform—basically, school was shortened a year, but the curriculum remained the same. Same content, less time to learn it = stressed out pupils and pissed off parents. Add to that 28 to 32 pupils per class and the CSU government refusing to hire more teachers... Another example of stupid education policy was the introduction of student fees (i.e. "college tuition"). Compared to Amercia, student fees aren't much, 1200€ a year. But the impact has been huge. A lot of students working part-time had to quit, people who started university after learning a profession had to quit. Basically, it has reinforced class segregation in University. In Bavaria, children of educated parents are disproportionally likely to study (i.e. "attend college"); a child from a single-parent household has a one in ten chance to even make it to high-school graduation. Even less study. (Which, incidentally, is reinforced by the school reform—a single parent doesn't have the time to train much with their child.)

The CSU is also pushing for a third runway to Munich airport—good for business but bad for the people living near/under the entry lane. Same with a new motorway that would basically destroy a nature reserve, be a sore sight for the eyes and cost more than the alternative track proposed by locals and environmentalists.

During the election campaign, Beckstein declared that "a real Bavarian votes CSU". In German: ein anständiger Bayer wählt CSU. "Anständig" is a bit tricky to translate. It can mean real as in original; it can also mean honest, fair, proper, decent. If you reverse it, it becomes clearer: If you don't vote CSU, you're not a Bavarian.

Which enraged a lot of people.

During all of this, Beckstein and Huber gave the impression that one didn't know what the other did, often contradicting the other in press conferences, generally not understanding what the fuss was all about and standing helpless in front of crisis.

The CSU party slogan had been "Closer to the people" and 50+x, meaning 50% + x% of the vote. Though they wanted to be a people's party, for years they have catered to the needs of business and their own politcal agendas.

As a Turkisch-Bavarian comedian put it: "Any seemingly dead has more feeling for the people." ("Da hat ja jeder Scheintote mehr Gefühl fürs Volk.")

Sometimes, selfishness, stupidity, greed, and insulting behavior in politicians is indeed punished by the people.

So, Beckstein had to go. As did Huber. And a few people lower down the food chain one didn't even know existed (or what it was they did exactly).

Theoretically, the four other parties elected to the Landtag could form the new Bavarian government. Together they've got enough votes. Personally, I'd like them to try. Just to see the reaction of the CSU.

To be fair, it's not just the CSU that lost during this election, but the SPD as well. People are disenchanted with their policy and looking elsewhere, mostly voting for smaller parties such as FDP, Freie Wähler. But the CSU suffered the heaviest losses and most of those could be tied to their blunders in making policy and during the election campaign.

Pfiadi!

(For further information check out Der Spiegel and this article in the New York Times.)

Open Wide...

It Occurs to Me…

…that people who like the "sunny optimism" of politicians like Sarah Palin and, before her, Ronald Reagan, are people who don't mind if you piss on their legs, as long as you tell them it's raining.

I am pretty much the opposite of that.

Open Wide...

Conservatives Lead in Poll

From the Star:

With the fallout from the televised leaders debates still to register, a new poll suggests the Conservatives established a comfortable lead over their Liberal challengers.
WHAT?

Oh, wait...
The Canadian Press Harris-Decima rolling poll gave the Tories 37 per cent support, 15 points clear of the Liberals at just 22 per cent.

The NDP was breathing down Liberal necks with 18 per cent, followed by the Greens at 12 per cent and the Bloc Quebecois with nine per cent.

Harris-Decima president Bruce Anderson says the Tory lead is more than twice the winning margin the party enjoyed in 2006, even though support levels are largely the same.
Whew. It's the Canadian election on October 14 that they're talking about.

Made you look.

Open Wide...

Friday Cat Blogging



Matilda: "I told you the box was mine."



Olivia: "Yeah, but do you have an adorable pink nose? I think not."



Sophie: "Who's gonna play with meeeeeeeee?!"

The conversation continues...

Open Wide...

Friday Blogaround

lol your blogaround

Recommended Reading:

Kim: McCain Emphasizes Concern for Veterans...So Just What Has He Done About Walter Reed?

That's all today. Just go read that.

And remember, as you read it, that when you hear Republicans say that government-sponsored healthcare doesn't work, it's because they refuse to properly fund it. They set it up to fail, because successful government-sponsored healthcare undermines their platform, and being right is more important than saving children's lives.

Leave your links in comments...

Open Wide...

Sarah Palin Sexism Watch, #23

And, in a perfect example of how sexism begets sexism, all women are smeared in process of explaining Why Some Women Hate Sarah Palin—because while we're only talking about the "some" women who hate Palin, it is not "some women" but merely, hugely, "women" who " re weapons-grade haters…When women get their hate on, they don't just dislike, or find disfavor with, or sort of not really appreciate. They loathe—deeply, richly, sustainingly." And why do they loathe Palin? Because she is "too pretty…too confident…[and] could embarrass us."

That this festering turd of an article was written for Time magazine by a woman only underlines how much easier it is to make a career out of being a woman who talks about women if you hate them—and, possibly, yourself.

[H/T to Shaker S.H. in comments. Sarah Palin Sexism Watch: Parts One, Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, Seven, Eight, Nine, Ten, Eleven, Twelve, Thirteen, Fourteen, Fifteen, Sixteen, Seventeen, Eighteen, Nineteen, Twenty, Twenty-One, Twenty-Two. We defend Sarah Palin against misogynist smears not because we endorse her or her politics, but because that's how feminism works.]

Open Wide...

Two Other Quick Thoughts…

…about the debate.

1. I had hoped Gwen Ifill had asked a question about abortion last night—and it's not because Biden would have done well with his answer; his answer would have been almost exactly as disappointingly incomplete as his answer on same-sex marriage. It's because Palin's position on abortion (against abortion even in cases of rape and incest) is extreme to the point of newsworthiness. Perhaps Ifill was hoping Palin would volunteer the information when she was asked what policy differences she has with McCain, but of course she did not, instead spouting nonsense about how there are bound to be differences when you've got "two mavericks on the same ticket!" *wink* At that point, I was hoping Ifill would specifically inquire about Palin's abortion views, which are outside both the American mainstream and her own party's platform, but, alas, she did not. It was a big gap in the debate, in my opinion, on a subject I don't think Palin could have folksied her way out of.

2. The reflexive invocation of The American FamilyTM—Mom, Pop, two kids, a dog, and a cat in a little white house on Main Street in Smalltown, USA—was getting on my last good nerve last night. How many families do you know that fit that description? I know three—and one of them is a step-parent situation. Now, please understand I'm not denigrating families who fit this description (one of the three families of which I'm thinking is Misty's, who's a cool mom married to a cool dad with four kids so cool they almost make my ovaries twitch); I'm just pointing out that there are lots of other kinds of families in America, and, between the single moms, and homes headed by grandparents, and gay parents, and single-person households, and deliberately childless gay and straight couples, and unmarried long-term partners, and polyamorous relationships, and parents living with adult children, and best friends living together, and all kinds of families-by-design, I'm not sure that The American FamilyTM is even the most common construction anymore. (And, as Spudsy noted on the phone last night, most Americans don't live in rural small towns anymore, either.)

Often it's just a semantic thing: Instead of saying "so American families can pay for their kids' education," politicians (especially the Dems) should be saying "so American parents can pay for their kids' education," "so Americans can afford an education," so as not to suggest every family is made up of parents and children and acknowledge that many people pay for their own education. Once, it's no big deal—but you hear that shit over and over and over in every debate, every stump speech, every policy proposal, and it gets old. After awhile, it's just alienating for the millions of families who don't fit that unspoken description—not to mention actively hostile to the millions of people who would love nothing more than to look like The American FamilyTM but aren't allowed to. Talking about one specific family design like it's the ideal to which all of us should aspire, when not all of us want to and many of us legally can't achieve it, is just gross. And I really wish that American politicians would give it a fucking rest.

Open Wide...

Move Along; Nothing to See Here

I've got a new piece reviewing the debate for The Guardian's Comment is free America:

When the vice-presidential debate starts, Sarah Palin looks so terrified that it actually makes me physically uncomfortable to watch. But within two winks and a "Joe Sixpack," my discomfort has given way to contempt and equilibrium is restored.

Pretty quickly, it's evident that anyone tuning in to the debate hoping to see a trainwreck will be disappointed – and, by its end, the only thing wrecked are my associates who took a shot every time Palin uttered the words "Alaska" and "maverick" and "taxes."

What I notice most pointedly is that Joe Biden's answers have been internalised and Palin's have been memorised. He speaks about the minutiae of foreign policy with the ease and surety and fond familiarity that I might speak about the details of circa-1987 Britpop b-sides – it's part of his soul. She sounds like a jukebox whose every slot is filled with a different Republican talking point. J17: Lower taxes. H21: Drill, baby, drill. His responses are the result of years of immersion in these issues; hers the result of days of cramming. And it shows.

Considering that Biden was expected to call her "Tootsie" and Palin was expected to fall off the stage, I'm vaguely surprised to be bored to hell after the first hour. I may have fallen asleep if Palin's mispronunciation of nuclear didn't keep compelling me to jam pencils into my ears.
Read the whole thing here.

While you're there, also check out Lola Adesioye's review, which makes a very good point about how rather un-debatelike last night's debate really was.

Open Wide...

A view from the inside…

A. J. Bockelman, Executive Director of PROMO, attended the Vice Presidential debate in St. Louis last night and he has posted on The Huffington Post about his view from the front lines.

PROMO is Missouri’s statewide LGBT equality organization.

Check it out

Open Wide...