Oversight subcommittee hearing on sexual assault in the military

The parents of PFC LaVena Johnson believe that their daughter was murdered in Iraq - contrary to Army claims of suicide - and suspect that she may have been victim to a sexual assault. The Army has resisted calls for reinvestigation of the matter; public and Congressional attention are required in order to change military minds. Gina at What About Our Daughters? has alerted readers to an opportunity to bring LaVena's case to legislators - a public hearing on sexual assault in the military held by a sub- of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform:

On Thursday, July 31 at 10:00 am, [the Subcommittee on National Security and Foreign Affairs] will hold a hearing entitled, “Oversight Hearing on Sexual Assault in the Military.” The hearing will take place in room 2154 of the Rayburn House Office Building and is open to the public.

It should be noted that the chairman of the parent committee - Representative Henry Waxman - is the named petitionee of a new public appeal for hearings on the LaVena Johnson case. This petition is authored by the advocacy group ColorofChange.

The chair of the subcommittee is Rep. John F. Tierney of the Sixth District of Massachusetts. The names of other subcommittee members, and suggestions on trying to put LaVena on their agenda for the day, may be found at the What About Our Daughters? post.

Open Wide...

Feministing, BuzzFlash on LaVena

Apologies for coming late to the July 18 writeup on PFC LaVena Johnson by Ann Friedman of Feministing. The post asks readers to spare just a couple of minutes to sign the Danielle Vyas-authored petition to Congress and President Bush, which has (of this writing) 2374 signatures with a goal of 3000. Friedman references posts on LaVena by a number of feminist writers; some of them have been previously noted here, while others are new to me:

You may have read about LaVena recently on Feministing, or from Cara, Megan at Jezebel, Gina at What About Our Daughters, and Kate at Broadsheet...

I am very happy to add Friedman to the growing list of writers whom I owe thanks for support for a renewed investigation of LaVena's death in Iraq.

Also on that list is Meg White for bringing LaVena's story to the many readers of BuzzFlash in a news analysis piece posted today. It is a capsule of the Johnson family's trials in pushing the Army to revisit the investigation of their daughter's death, and the possibility that she had been the victim of a sexual assault. Like Friedman's entry at Feministing, White touches on the CommonDreams.org article by retired Army colonel Ann Wright on other suspicious deaths of women in service, and references the recently-launched ColorofChange to Rep. Henry Waxman of the House Oversight and Governmental Affairs Committee. Many thanks to White for this entry.

Open Wide...

Teaspoons in Hand...

If you've not yet read Shaker Bekitty's guest post about the tragedy at the Tennessee Valley Unitarian Universalist Church, start there.

Then head over to the Knoxville Relief Fund, which has been set up to help pay for long-term medical care and psychological counseling for the victims, and contribute whatever you can, even if it's just a message of support.

[H/T to Bekitty's fellow congregant Elrod.]

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

[We've done this one before, but it was loads of fun, so I'm re-running it...]

What book can you not believe hasn't yet been turned into a movie?

When I first thought of this question, six books instantly flooded to mind all at once, because they are books I re-read, and every time I wonder why no one's ever seen fit to bring them to the screen, because they're all powerful, amazing, unique stories:

1. Donna Tartt's The Secret History

2. Michelle Cliff's No Telephone to Heaven

3. Katherine Dunn's Geek Love

4. Margaret Marshall Saunders' Beautiful Joe

5. Doris Lessing's Briefing for a Descent Into Hell

6. Toni Morrison's The Bluest Eye

See if you can spot what all six of these books have in common.

Open Wide...

Rhetorical Question of the Day

Do you think you're cool or something?

That's a question I just got in the never-ending stream of hilariously idiotic emails pouring in from all corners of the fanboyverse. The answer is, of course, yes. I think I'm cool. Or something.

What about you, Shakers: Do you think you're cool or something?

Open Wide...

Random YouTubery: Battle of Song


Via Recon, who has this to say on the matter:
Check out this uber-weird FTW zen moment from an episode of "Fiveman" where instead of fighting in a traditional manner, the robots and monsters decide to "sing" each other into submission. What a brilliant and strange idea. Give me a team with Hanna Montana and the Jonas brothers and I'll raise the dead, make their ears explode, and kill them all over again.

Open Wide...

Yes, Please

Johnny Depp to play Mad Hatter:

Johnny Depp is to play the Mad Hatter in Tim Burton's new film, Alice in Wonderland.

The actor and director's past collaborations have resulted in some of Depp's most memorable roles, including Willy Wonka, Edward Scissorhands and Sweeney Todd. This will be their seventh film together.
lol your film

[H/T to Shaker Mel.]

Open Wide...

Quote of the Day

"She is proud of her body and doesn't want it altered."—A source close to actress Keira Knightley, who has "refused to allow her cleavage to be enhanced on publicity photos for her upcoming movie The Duchess, according to reports. Film studios bosses apparently wanted to enlarge Knightley's assets in the photos so she appears more buxom in her low-cut period costumes, but the actress has put her foot down and said no."

(As before, yes, I know there are constant reports that she is anorexic, but considering in candid papz shots not at ritualized post-starving celebrations premieres / award shows, she generally looks like a healthy young woman—as opposed to, say, this—and bearing in mind that I always see pictures of her walking everywhere, which is what you do in London, instead of taking limos everywhere, I'm disinclined to let the accusations preempt a commendation of her continued forthrightness about the beauty illusion. YMMV.)

Open Wide...

L.A. Quake

All the Cali Shakers (no pun intended!) okay?

Open Wide...

Tomorrow, there'll be sun.

by Shaker Bekitty, a member of the Tennessee Valley Unitarian Universalist Church

I'm never going to be able to hear balloons popping or cars backfiring without ducking under a table. Ever again.

"Come on! We're going to be late. I promised Taylor and Gina we'd be there and take photos. I want a good seat, and it's bound to be popular." It was 9.50am on Sunday, 27 July 2008, the day of the Tennessee Valley Unitarian Universalist Church's production of "Annie Junior". The children and teens of the church, along with our sister church Westside UU, had been working on the play at their summer theatre camp for the last two weeks. My friend Gina had done the choreography, but had had to go to Florida before the performance. I was tasked with making sure I took plenty of photos and reviewing the play for her, a task I didn't mind a bit.

We went into the sanctuary which, as I'd expected, was crowded with people. Most were TVUUCers, a fair amount were from Westside, and there were friends of the cast who had come to see them perform. Everyone was happy.

At the door, the ushers were giving out programs. Greg McKendry handed David his program with a smile. We liked Greg. He was a tireless worker for the church, intelligent, always looking for ways that he could make a difference. He and his wife Barbara were in the process of adopting our friend Taylor, who had been a ward of the state and had gone from foster home to foster home, seeking stability and a real loving family. He'd finally found it in the McKendrys.

The seats that we usually took on the right-hand side had a large sign on them that said "Reserved for Cast Members", so we sat in the front row on the other side of the sanctuary.

It was 10.00am. Time for the service to start.

A member of the church board came up and made some announcements, including that the collection would be taken up before the performance as they didn't want to interrupt it halfway through. There was laughter, and people willingly put money on the collection plate.

Then the microphone was handed to TVUUC Music Director Vicki Masters, who had both produced and directed the play. She spoke briefly about the theatre camp and introduced the play. Then she sat down and the overture began. It was 10.10am.

The orphans came on and the first scene began. Annie came on, comforted them, and they sang "Maybe". Then Miss Hannigan came in. It was 10.15.

She said her first line, and then we heard a loud noise from the right-hand side of the sanctuary.

Pop.

People looked up, puzzled. Was is a sound equipment malfunction? Part of the scene? I'd never seen "Annie", so I had no idea what to expect. Vicki got up to see what had happened. Then she screamed "Get down, everybody!"

Then two more sounds.

Pop, pop.

Then a whole lot of screaming and running.

David said to me urgently "We need to get out. Now!"

I grabbed my bag and coffee cup and went quickly out the fire exit door to the left of the stage. As we left, I could smell something burning. We came out onto the lawn by the car park. I still had no idea what was going on.

David said, "There was a guy with a shotgun. I saw him."

The rest of the afternoon is a series of images. Taylor, running up to us, crying hysterically, yelling "Greg's been shot!" Us, wordlessly trying to comfort him. Parents, hysterical with worry, trying to find where their children had gone. One person going around, making a list of who was present. Brian Griffin, TVUUC's Director of Lifespan Religious Education, calming us all down, leading a prayer and meditation. Police cars, ambulances, and fire engines arriving at the church within minutes. Everybody took out their cellphone, everybody made the call to 911. The first call got through at 10.18am, and the first police arrived at 10.21.

I later heard other things. How when the shooter had arrived, he had first tried to go through the stage door on the right side of the sanctuary, but was turned away. How he had walked past some of the children, taken a 12-gauge shotgun out of the guitar case he was carrying, and started to shoot. How our dear friend Greg had stood there, shielding other people with his body, and been shot at point-blank range. How when the shooter tried to reload his gun, three people (including John Bohstedt, who got him in a flying tackle) jumped on him, followed quickly by more. How at the sound of the shots, one of the older children led all of the others in the RE wing out a back door and up to the neighbouring Second Presbyterian Church. How the injured people had been taken to the University of Tennessee Hospital, which had the best trauma unit in the city.

I started making calls on my cellphone. First, to Gina, to tell her what had happened, and to make sure that her husband Eric was alright. I hadn't seen him, and I was worried. Then my friends Sara and Sean. They had been running late, had got to the church at 10.25 and were turned away at the gate. As they turned the car around, they saw the ambulances arriving. They had called and left messages, wondering what had happened and whether we were alright. Then my family.

Then we all went back to the Fellowship Hall and were talked to by a police detective, who was in charge of the case. He asked if anybody who had actually seen the shooter to put their hand up, and took them away to another room to be interviewed. David went with them. I stayed in the Fellowship Hall, talking to people, giving and receiving hugs, making sure my friends were alright. Then my cellphone strted ringing. The media had gotten hold of the story, and it had gone national. Friends and family needed to know that we were alright, and if there was anything they could do.

All I could ask them to do was light a candle for us, and for Greg, Barbara and Taylor.

I was relying on calls from outside to tell me what was going on. We weren't given any information. Most of us were in various stages of shock and grief. And anger. Lots of anger. All of it directed at the person who had come into our sanctuary and hurt our people.

I was asked to watch Taylor, as he was unable to sit in one place and stay there for very long. I understood his need to talk to others, to find out whether they were alright, to be comforted in turn.

Volunteers from the American Red Cross came in bearing food. People came from Second Presbyterian bringing cold drinks and ice. Everyone felt the need to do something, to help, to feel useful.

I couldn't eat. Not then. It took me until Monday night before I could taste food again.

When we were finally allowed to go, we were directed out the back of the church car park, where the media were waiting for us. I just kept repeating "no comment, no comment" as we drove away.

We went over to Sara's apartment, where she and Sean were waiting for us. Our friend Kat, a trauma nurse, came over shortly afterwards. Together we watched the coverage unfold on the internet and television. We were shaking, tearful, and numb by turns. How could this happen? Why did Greg, a good man, have to die? How could a human being do that to other human beings?

When we saw Greg's picture on the television, it finally hit me, and I couldn't stop crying. I couldn't stop thinking of Barbara and Taylor. How they must be feeling. What could we do to help them?

Later, we went along to a service at Westside UU, where we met up with more of our friends who had been worried about us. All of them had been planning to be at the TVUUC service that morning, and for various reasons, none of them made it along. For this I was truly thankful.

As Kat, David and I entered the church at Westside, a photographer snapped us from behind without our knowledge.


At the service, the Reverend Mitra Jafarzadeh said, "There will be a time for grief. There will be a time for tears. This is a time of shock. I'm not going to tell you where was a great reason for this. I'm not going to tell you there was some cosmic purpose for this. I am going to tell you that it is good to be together."

The following night, there was a candlelit vigil at Second Presbyterian Church for those injured and killed and their families. There were almost a thousand people, singing, holding hands, crying, being a community. Some of them were from TVUUC, some from Westside UU, a few from Second Presbyterian, a few from Temple Beth-El, a few from the local Muslim community, a few from local Baptist churches, and a huge amount of people who didn't necessarily belong to any church, but who had come to show their support.

That, my friends, is community.

And I believe that for that reason, we will get through this. We will all get through this. With support and love, we can and will survive.

After the service, some of us went down to the TVUUC sanctuary for the first time since the shooting. I let the tears flow, and the healing begin.

Rest in peace, Greg McKendry.
Rest in peace, Linda Kraeger.

You were loved, and will be missed.

The sun'll come out tomorrow
So ya gotta hang on 'til tomorrow, come what may
Tomorrow! Tomorrow! I love ya, tomorrow!
You're always a day away!

[Crossposted.]

Open Wide...

Patriotic Image of the Day

Open Wide...

one of these things is not like the other

This time of year is our second round of "birthday season" for this year, what with Kiddo#3's fourth birthday being this past Sunday (the 27th), Kiddo#4's third birthday on August 11th, and John's birthday on August 21st. We eat a lot of cake this time of year (and in February when three of us have birthdays, also on the 11th, 21st, and 27th!). So anyway, I was just browsing Amazon for the soon-to-be three year old's birthday and this is what came up on the generic "Toddler Toys" search that they sort by best-selling:

Why so serious?


Joker HeadKnockers...in high demand from every two year old!

Open Wide...

From the Mailbag

Shaker OlderThanDirt recommends the essay Feminist Analytic Philosophy published on Google's new service Knol.

Shaker Lilli forwards this slideshow (click on the photo to begin) in which designers offer the "Dos and Don'ts of Dressing Sexy Over 40." Lilli notes there's an "interesting collection of answers." Totally.

Shaker Megan Kay sends along another entry in the "aversion to the word rape" series, in which CNN once again is suffering from the misapprehension that 13-year-olds can have consensual sex with adults.

Shaker Bluestockingsrs forwards Shock jock mimics sexual assault on Isabel Garcia, in which a couple of assholes "pasted a picture of Arizona public defender and activist Isabel Garcia onto a pinata, and proceeded to mock and fondle the object." Shades of Opie and Anthony.

Shaker Bohica recommends Military Women Ready to Rock the Boat— a must-read about some extraordinarily brave women.

Shaker Lena sends the hilarious In study, evidence of liberal-bias bias. You'll be shocked—shocked, I say!—to discover that the network news tends to be harder on the Democrat than the Republican. Great Caesar's Ghost! Next they'll be telling us the world ain't flat!

Action Item: Shakers Sophronia and TheBratQueen send heads-up about a truly unbelievable episode of a new show on ABC Family called "The Secret Life of the American Teenager," in which, as Sophronia describes it: "the show opened with a scene where a cheerleader was waiting for a ride at night and was attacked by two men. She knelt down to pray, then smashed a beer bottle and tried to fight them off with the broken end, before a male friend showed up and scared them away. The show proceeded to play this incident for laughs, with everyone from her fellow students and their parents to the anchor people on the local news giggling about it. The girl herself is remorseful about getting violent with them and eventually quits the cheerleading squad as a way of punishing herself."

TheBratQueen's post about it here, and includes links to video of the sequence. Watch it—and then let ABC know what you think about playing rape for laughs.

Open Wide...

Caption This Photo



The furniture showroom contained various application examples of this particular piece, from storage to napping.

(Via CuteOverload)

Open Wide...

More Fat Princess

This is currently on Yahoo's front page:


It links to this article, in which they just nicked a quote from my original post. I'd be a lot happier if I made the front page of Yahoo as a feminist "outraged" by the treatment of Kobra Najjar, or any one of about a thousand other things about which I write. Sigh.

I continue to be amazed by the response to my raising objections to this game, and how few people can discern the difference between offended and contemptuous. An administration that makes torture the official policy of this nation offends me. A video game that uses a fat woman as a punchline arouses nothing but contempt.

A British gaming magazine interviewed me yesterday about my objections to the game. My responses are below, for anyone interested. I've no idea whether they'll ever get printed, given that I had a couple of conditions—namely, not being cast as the Feminist HystericTM. Included is one response is an explanation of why I won't be "eating crow" anytime in the near future.

[H/T to everyone in the multiverse. Previous Fat Princess: One, Two, Three, Four.]

Could you explain what you find so offensive about Fat Princess?

There are a few things I find objectionable about Fat Princess, but I'll stick with the obvious: The concept is hostile to fat women. The eponymous Fat Princess is an object of ridicule, and the source of her fatness—being fed endless amounts of food by her captors, which she cannot refuse because she has no agency—reinforces the myth that the singular cause of fatness is overeating. Whole books have been written debunking this myth. Of course there are people for whom compulsive overeating is the source of their fatness, which is as serious a psychological issue as compulsive undereating, despite our cultural failure to regard it thus. Anyone who understands why Anorexic Princess would not be considered an appropriate game should understand my objection to this one.

How do you respond to the common argument "it's just a game, and it's not meant to be taken seriously"?

It's a common criticism of feminism (or any similar social critique) that focusing on the "little things" is a waste of energy or resources, as if feminism could run out. The idea that feminism should be kept under glass, broken only in case of a "big" emergency, is predicated on the erroneous assumption that "the little things," like video games, happen in a void, but they don't. Fat Princess is part of the same culture in which the "big things" exist, like fat women making less money or being given sub-standard attention by healthcare providers. And, in a very real way, ignoring "the little things" makes the big ones that much harder to eradicate, because it is the pervasive, ubiquitous, inescapable little things that create the foundation of the culture on which the big stuff is dependent for its survival. It's the little things, the constant drumbeat of inequality and objectification, that inure us to increasingly horrible acts and attitudes toward fat women.

FP's developer recently said the concept art for the game was designed by a female. Does that change your views at all?

No. And the fact that it's being offered as a defense of the game is telling—the suggestion being that if a woman did the concept art for the game, that must mean other women shouldn't have reason to object. "Women" are hardly a monolithic group.

Do you think video games trail behind other mediums when it comes to sexist portrayals of females? If so why?

No—they're about on par with popular film and television, for example. The general lag is attributable in large part, as with other media, with insularity and lack of diversity in production. Genuine diversity necessitates actively recruiting women, LGBTQIs, and people of color who have a problem with the way women, LGBTQIs, and POC have been traditionally represented (or underrepresented) in games and want to infuse them with new visions, not just serve as tokens who put a new face on the same old shit.

Do you have a negative view of gamers who play video games containing sexist portrayals of women, even if they're playing the game in spite of such portrayals?

That's not really a yes or no question, because "sexist portrayals of women" is such an inexact phrase. There's clearly a fundamental difference between a game which merely fails to offer a comprehensive selection of female body types and a game in which only a male character can be played and the storyline tacitly or overtly encourages sexual violence against female characters.

Do you think it's possible to be a gamer and a feminist at the same time, given how hard it is to avoid games that sexualize their female characters?

Yes. I'm a gamer. My husband is a gamer. Many of our friends are gamers. I know plenty of other feminist gamers—women and men. But our choices are pretty limited—and no wonder, given the response to my original post on Fat Princess.

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime

The Real Ghostbusters

Open Wide...

You Have GOT to Be Kidding Me

Sources: Obama Campaign Seriously Vetting Kaine:

Virginia governor Tim Kaine has told close associates that he has had "very serious" conversations with Sen. Barack Obama about joining the Democratic ticket and has provided documents to the campaign as it combs through his background, according to several sources close to Kaine.
Anytime a report like this is attributed to "sources" during the veepstakes, it's very likely to be a trial balloon being floated by the nominee's campaign.

Suffice it to say I am as decidedly unthrilled as I am (unfortunately) totally unsurprised that the Obama campaign is even considering putting a gay-baiting DINO war hawk whose personal "views on abortion are roughly in line with those of George W. Bush" on the ticket.

I started this campaign season looking at the Democratic field and thinking I couldn't possibly be disappointed. LOL.

Good times.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

What's your favorite superhero movie?

I don't know if I can choose just one, but I'm still liking these new superheroes of ours.

Open Wide...

Obligatory Dark Knight Open Thread


A major SPOILER WARNING will be operative for this whole thread, including the rest of this post...

Iain and I saw it in IMAX!!11!!!eleventy-one!! with Mama and Papa Shakes this weekend. I totally loved it, my one complaint being that it was ridiculously short on female characters and people of color; Maggie Gyllenhaal was laughably underused, and when there's basically only one other female character of passing note, you can't make her corrupt, even with a sob story about a sick mother.

Mind you, I love Morgan Freeman so much I'd go see a film of him farting for two hours, but Lucius Fox was the obvious character to feminize for the big screen. It would have been awesome to see a female scientist, in particular. Naturally, I'd prefer to see a woman of color in the role, since if you 86 Freeman, you get rid of the only prominent POC, too. Paging Angela Bassett.

That there was a woman of color cast as a judge in a film so frustratingly devoid of female and/or POC characters just made me laugh. Has no one involved with casting the film heard the complaints about black female judges on TV? There are more black female judges on Law & Order than in the whole of the American judiciary; it's always the bit part that's cast with a nod to diversity, as if to apologize for casting ten zillion white female assistant DAs in a row. Same thing here—except she had the misfortune of being blown up, too!

And gay characters? Whazzat? Whozit? Wuh? Come on—can we get Alfred a boyfriend already?

Okay, so my usual (though by no means insignificant) complaint notwithstanding, I really did love the film otherwise. I've noted some criticism that the film was a neocon manifesto, a justification for engaging policy that encroaches on civil rights, but that really misses the point. The movie certainly does make a case for taking power; but, more importantly, it makes the case for giving it back.

And it makes no bones about its opinion of leaders who don't.

Open Wide...

More on Knoxville Church Shooting

Previous post here. The Knoxnews has opened up a guest book for those who would like to leave messages of support for those affected by the shooting.

In a truly bizarre coincidence with other posts on the blog today, information trickling out about Jim David Adkisson reveals that he was the abusive ex-husband of a long-time member of the church, and that a search of his house recovered, among other things:

"Liberalism is a Mental Health Disorder" by radio talk show host Michael Savage, "Let Freedom Ring" by talk show host Sean Hannity, and "The O'Reilly Factor," by television talk show host Bill O'Reilly.
As I've said before, and will no doubt say again, this shit doesn't happen in a void. The conservative media has long been centered around violent, eliminationist rhetoric and "jokes." I would like to think this tragedy will make people reconsider the wisdom of "jokes" exhorting violence against other Americans (or anyone else), and fear that it won't.

It's all too easy to shirk responsibility for one's contributions to the culture in which this happened with pithy statements like, "Millions of people listen to that stuff and only one guy took it to heart." Thing is, all of us who put ideas "out there" into the public sphere know damn well that we influence people, which is why it's important not to be flippant and toss around dangerous ideas as "jokes." And somehow, "Hey, I was only kidding; it's not my problem if the guy couldn't understand a joke" doesn't strike me as being of particular comfort, to the people who lost someone in a real-world manifestation of such "hilarity."

Open Wide...