Obama Racism/Muslim/Unpatriotic/Scary Black Dude Watch, #58

Pin being sold at the Texas State Republican Convention:


Pathetically, this isn't even the first time I've had occasion to write about this hee-larious "joke"—I posted about a guy who made the same dumbass comment at the Citizen of the West banquet back in January.

Aside from being racist, that shit's just made of hack. Who thinks that's funny?!

Between the "Black House" jokes and the stuffed monkey toys, I'm beginning to think the race-based opposition to Obama is being run by a mad three-year-old.

Although, that's probably an insult to three-year-olds, some of whom undoubtedly have more sophisticated senses of humor.

[H/T to Oddjob, who hat tips Radical Russ.]

Open Wide...

An Open Letter to Today's Happy Newlyweds

by Shaker Lena Dahlstrom, a crossdresser from the San Francisco Bay area who also performs as a drag queen under the stage name "Joie de Vivre." She always gets teary-eyed at weddings.

First let me offer my congratulations on this joyous day. It's been far too long in coming.

Now I hope you'll indulge my taking a moment to note that it was a trans man who was the lead attorney in the marriage equality case, the one who made the oral arguments to the California Supreme Court that marriage won't be worth less if more can take part in it, and ask you to keep that in mind the next time ENDA (the Employment Non-Discrimination Act) comes up for a vote in Congress.

More importantly, I'd ask you to remember Shannon and his dedication to this cause when ENDA comes up for a vote again and the "virtually normal" gay and lesbian crowd claims that trans and gender variant people (who can also be LGB or even hetero) should be excluded because supposedly we haven't done jack to deserve anti-discrimination protections.

In the spirit of the day let me mention:

Something old

Trans people have part of the LGBT communities—and fighting for LGBT rights—for decades. As the authors of Gay L.A. noted: "We choose to call our book Gay L.A. because, as our older informants told us, 'gay' in the 1930s, '40s, '50s, and '60s was the term that included homosexual men, lesbians, transgenders, and even bisexuals." A few highlights:

In 1895 a group of New York "androgynes" organized The Cercle Hermaphroditos "to unite against the world's bitter persecution"—two years before the world's first gay liberation organization, nearly 30 years before the first known gay activist group in the United States and nearly six decades before the first long-lasting gay and lesbian rights groups.

In the 1960s, trans man multi-millionaire Reed Erickson was the major funder (to the tune of $2 million—more than $1 billion in today's dollars) of ONE Inc., one of the first gay rights organizations, which won a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision.

In 1965, Dewey's Lunch Counter in Philadelphia was the target of the first LGBT sit-in, after the diner refused to serve young gay and trans patrons in what were euphemistically called "non-conformist clothing." In 1966, trans woman fed up with police harassment turned into "screaming queens" and rioted at Compton's Cafeteria in San Francisco. In 1969, trans woman and drag queen Sylvia Rivera threw one of the first bottles at Stonewall and later was a tireless advocate for queer rights.

Despite Rivera's efforts, within a few years, New York's gay rights establishment dropped drag queens and trans people from its civil rights agenda and Rivera was physically prevented from speaking at the 1973 Stonewall commemoration. Sadly this was part of a larger anti-trans backlash within not only the gay communities but also among lesbians, where trans women—such as Beth Elliot, who had been vice president of the pioneering lesbian rights group, the Daughters of Bilitis—were systematically outed and purged from lesbian feminist circles, and where Janice Raymond's notoriously transphobic 1979 book, The Transsexual Empire, became lauded reading.

Still, trans people continued to fight for the gay and lesbian communities. Connie Norman was a nationally known AIDS activist during the 1980s, who also pioneered the first commercial radio talk show programs on gay and lesbian issues.

Unfortunately, people like Norman weren't enough to change these widespread transphobic attitudes. In 1993, the gay and lesbian organizers of the "March on Washington"—one of the largest civil rights demonstrations in history—decided to include bisexuals, but refused to include "transgender" as part of the name of the protest. And when the 1999 murder of soldier Pfc. Barry Winchell was turned into a gay rights cause celeb, forcing President Bill Clinton to order a review of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," gay activists and the gay press suppressed a critical, but inconvenient truth—Winchell wasn't killed for being gay, but because he was a heterosexual man in love with trans woman (which Winchell's killers assumed made him gay).

Something new

By all accounts, when ENDA is reintroduced next year it will be stripped of protections for gender identity and expression. This isn't a "trans-less" ENDA as it's often referred to—it's an ENDA without protections for anyone (even heteros) who isn't straight-acting enough. Employers may not be able to fire you if you're gay or lesbian, but they'll still be able to fire you for being too nelly or too butch. In fact, a GenderPAC survey found that a third of gay, lesbian and bisexual respondents who suffered workplace discrimination said it was due at least in part to their gender expression and another 10 percent said it was due strictly to their gender expression.

Something borrowed

From a July 1990 flier by Queer Nation: "We are Queer Nation. We are here to promote unity between all people—some of whom are like us, most of whom are not. We do not necessarily expect to understand the differences between our cultures, our desires, our beliefs, but we do seek to increase respect and acceptance for all our differences so that we may move into the twenty-first century with joy and dignity."

Whether the "virtually normally" crowd likes it or not, gender variance is, for the foreseeable future, going to be linked to sexual variance. That's the thing about being "othered"—you don't get any choice in how others perceive you. No matter how straight-acting folks like Andrew Sullivan like to portray themselves, the haters are still going to invoke the specter of diesel dykes and flaming nellies. No matter how loudly a few (sadly homophobic) trans people insist they're heterosexual-I-said-heterosexual-dammit, the haters are still going to call them queers.

Lesbians, gays, bisexuals and trans people are all minorities. (Just for the record, a number of trans people are also lesbian, gay or bisexual.*) We have to work together to move our causes forward. We also have to rely on allies who aren't LGBT. Just as trans people, being a minority within a minority, have to rely on the LGB communities as allies. As Ben Franklin once said, we can either hang together or we can be hanged separately.

Something blue

I know that a number of you from states without marriage equality are irate about the "go slow" request from the ACLU and a half-dozen major LGBT organizations, asking people not to file lawsuits in your home states to have your marriages recognized there. (These groups fear that losing court cases outside California will set back the cause.) I hope you'll remember those feelings of disappointment, dismay and anger when the incrementalists like Barney Frank and John Aravosis once again tell trans and gender variant people to step aside and wait patiently for anti-discrimination protections "because the public just isn't ready." Which is an odd argument really, since surveys show far more support for protecting trans and gender variant people from discrimination than for marriage equality.

I suppose that's why the other canard is that trans people haven't done enough lobbying work—ignoring the fact that we've been working for anti-discrimination protections since 1980. If we weren't part of the "official" campaign for ENDA until a few years ago, it was because we had to spend at least a decade convincing gay and lesbian lobbying groups that our rights matter, too, and that we should be allowed to join their efforts. Nonetheless, we still helped the LGB communities win a number of state and local anti-discrimination measures that included not only protections for sexual orientation, but also gender identity and expression.

Anyway, I don't mean to be the ghost at the wedding banquet. This is your day, savor it in the fabulicious style that I know you will.

Best wishes, and may you have long and happy marriages,
Lena

P.S. Thanks to historian Susan Stryker whose research provided many of the historical examples.

---------------------------

* It's often easier to talk about whether trans people are attracted to men or women (or both), because their perceived sexual orientation changes with their perceived gender. Those who transition from male-to-female early in life typically are attracted to men and most female-to-male transitioners are attracted to women, so they go from being seen as gays and lesbians to being seen as hetero women and men. Transsexuals who transition from male-to-female late in life typically are attracted to women and female-to-male transitioners who are attracted to men go from being seen as hetero men and women to being seen as lesbians and gay men. So the vast majority of transitioners find themselves seen as homosexual at some point in their lives.

Open Wide...

Inside Baseball

Re: the Obama campaign's hiring of former Clinton campaign manager Patti Solis Doyle, about which I posted yesterday, there are emerging reports that the move was considered the "biggest fuck you I have ever seen in politics" by—surprise—an anonymous Clinton donor and "a slap in the face" by another (or the same) donor. Which makes for great chatter, as it furthers the OMGeleventy-one they hates each other! meme.

Never mind, of course, that Clinton campaign spokesman Mo Elleithee's praised Solis Doyle, calling her a "good addition to the Obama campaign" and noting her "extensive network that will be a huge asset to Sen. Obama," then offering the reminder: "As Sen. Clinton has said, we're all going to do our part to help elect Sen. Obama as the next president of the United States."

So there is one (possibly two) donor(s) running around miffed, but the official Clinton position—on a hire about which they had no need to issue a statement at all—is that it was a good thing. Which do you think is already becoming the conventional wisdom: slap in the face, or good thing?

Hint: Only one plays into the narrative that Clinton supporters are bitter old hags.

(Also see: Steven Benen. Sexism warning re: comments.)

Open Wide...

Same Sex Marriage Open for Business in California

ZOMGZOMGZOMG!!! And blub:


Cheers filled San Francisco's City Hall shortly after 5 p.m. as longtime lesbian activists Phyllis Lyon and Del Martin, partners for more than 50 years, began their second wedding - and their first legal union.

Mayor Gavin Newsom, who officiated the ceremony in the reception area of his office, said it was a fitting way to memorialize last month's state Supreme Court decision legalizing same-sex marriage in California, which took effect at 5:01 p.m.

Lyon, 83, and Martin, 87, were the first couple married four years ago when Newsom told the county clerk's office to start offering marriage certificates to same-sex couples. Eventually more than 4,000 same-sex couples were married in San Francisco that year, but those unions were later nullified by the court. Today, the couple, and dozens of others, had their first chance to make their unions truly legal.
Lyon's and Martin's ceremony was the only one at San Francisco's City Hall last night. Today, same-sex marriages will begin in earnest all over California. Thousands of couples are expected to marry, to exercise their equality.

This is a happy day.

And if any Shakers get hitched, I want pictures!



Digman Phoenix Barnes and William Marion Jennings
cheer as weddings begin in Oakland, California.

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime

Massachusetts Constitutional Convention 2007

The Massachusetts State House erupts into cheers as a vote of 151 to 45 is announced, killing the anti-same sex marriage constitutional amendment and protecting same sex marriage in the state.



They'll come for you, too, California. They won't win there, either.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

[We've done this one before, but it's one of my favorites, so I'm doing it again…]

Who will play you in Shakesville: The Movie?

Looks-wise, the obvious choice is Dawn French, to whom I am nearly identical in height and weight, and probably not dissimilar in temperament. She's 17 years older than I, but I won't complain if she won't.

My friend, J, with whom I most often play the "cast your life" game, swears that he wouldn't cast anyone as me except Debra Winger, but would accept Bonnie Hunt as a back-up. I look like neither of them, but I get what he's going for; the spirit makes sense. Iain would, very specifically, cast Natalie Portman's character from the film Garden State as me, ha—which, okay, I kind of get, because it would not be remotely unlike me to break into a spontaneous tapdance to make him grin in a heavy moment.

Iain would be played by Colin Firth, without question. They don't look much alike, aside from both being tall and broad-shouldered with curly hair, but the whole "shy-misinterpreted-as-aloof and vaguely impenetrable veneer masking the reticent, awkward doofus with a heartbreaking romantic streak" makes the comparison inescapable.

As a back-up: Matthew Macfadyen. Because, as it turns out, I'm married to Mr. Darcy.

Minus the ancestral estate.

Open Wide...

HELL TO THE NO!!!!!!!11!!

Second President Bush floats prospect of a third:

For only the second time in nearly three decades, there won't be a Bush on the presidential ballot this November. But that absence may not be a permanent one, the current White House occupants hinted Sunday.

President Bush was asked by a SkyNews correspondent whether the end of his term marked the end of the Bush presidential dynasty that began with his father’s Oval Office tenure 20 years ago.

In response, Bush singled out his brother, who has often been mentioned as a possible Republican presidential contender. "Well, we've got another one out there who did a fabulous job as governor of Florida, and that's Jeb," he said. "But you know, you better ask him whether or not he's thinking of running. But he'd be a great president."
Like hell!

I'd literally vote for a bag of vomit before I'd vote for Jeb Bush. Or any Bush. And, no, I don't care that Jebby would probably be a better president than Dubya. If I walked into the voting booth and saw my option was Jeb Bush or a bag o' vom, I'd choose the latter without a moment's hesitation or an ounce of regret and hope for the best.

Open Wide...

MSNBC VP: Olbermann is Like an Abusive Boyfriend

by Shaker JMonkey, a dad and a feminist who lives with his partner in Oregon. He did vote for Obama, but it was a close thing—he could just as easily have voted for Clinton.

Phil Griffin, senior vice-president in charge of MSNBC, is in a bit of a bind, according to a profile of Keith Olbermann in the most recent New Yorker.

At MSNBC, Phil Griffin was worried, and with good reason. The average "Countdown" viewer is fifty-nine years old, and forty-five per cent of the viewers are women, presumably Democratic—a fair description of a Hillary Clinton supporter. Griffin believed that Olbermann was beginning to alienate his core audience, and asked him to ease up a bit on Clinton, and possibly even make some conciliatory gesture to the Clinton camp. Olbermann was offended by the suggestion.
So, let's review the situation. Roughly half of Democrats voted for Hillary Clinton, Countdown is a show aimed at people of a Democratic persuasion, and your host, Keith Olbermann, has made eliminationist jokes about Clinton, dismissed the idea that media coverage of Clinton was sexist, going so far as to label someone who thought differently (Katie Couric) as "The Worst Person in the World," and dedicated "special commentary" segments to Clinton's RFK remark and to her alleged use of Republican themes to attack Obama.

So, how does Griffin respond? Well, apparently, he doesn't think the program needs to change one bit because Hillary Clinton supporters are just like a battered wives who have no safe place to go.

At least, that's how I interpret the following quote from the New Yorker article (emphasis mine):
But, just as Obama must work to win Clinton supporters for the fall campaign, Phil Griffin has to repair a fractured audience base, a portion of which saw sexism in his network's Clinton coverage and vowed to boycott MSNBC. Griffin knows that some of that anger is aimed at his star anchor. "It was, like, you meet a guy and you fall in love with him, and he's funny and he's clever and he's witty, and he's all these great things," Griffin said of the relationship between Olbermann and the Clinton supporters among his viewers. "And then you commit yourself to him, and he turns out to be a jerk and difficult and brutal. And that is how the Hillary viewers see him. It's true. But I do think they're going to come back. There's nowhere else to go."
How many problems are there with this quote?

1. Griffin implicitly identifies all Clinton supporters as women. Clearly, wrong. I'm not even going to bother finding a link.

2. He casually uses the metaphor of a battered spouse / partner / girlfriend to illustrate his point. If these are the terms you're using to describe a hefty chunk of your audience, I think it goes without saying that his network has a problem. But beyond what it illustrates about his attitude toward Clinton supporters and women in general, his use of this metaphor trivializes violence against women. As a national news executive, one would hope (vainly, it seems) he would understand that comparing his ratings problems to the widespread problem of domestic abuse is way out of bounds.

3. He casts Keith Olbermann as an abuser. Did this guy even have a rudimentary course in public relations? I mean, rule No. 1 is "Don't call your client as a wife beater."

4. It's belittling. The whole quote paints the viewer (specifically, women viewers, mind you) as helpless, love-sick puppy dogs.

5. Ultimately, the abuse is OK. Olbermann doesn't have to do a damn thing because the viewer (read: women) will come crawling back. In a Fox-dominated world, there's no place else to go, right?

Personally, I can think of a number of different places one could go at 8pm on a weeknight (watch a DVD, read a book, frisky business with a lover). Shockingly, NONE of them involves watching Countdown on MSNBC!

Open Wide...

A Tale of Two Photos

Part Wev in the ongoing series loosely known as The End is Nigh Watch.


Volunteers load sandbags for a levee protecting the town of Gulf Port, Illinois June 15, 2008. Muddy flood waters retreated from sections of Iowa's two largest cities on Sunday, exposing ruined homes and businesses, while the battle against still-rising rivers continued downstream. (Eric Thayer/Reuters)


President Bush reacts as another attempt at sinking a basket fails during a game of basketball with students at the Lough View Integrated Primary School in Belfast, Northern Ireland, June 16, 2008. (Jason Reed/Reuters)

218 days.

Open Wide...

Gore Endorses Obama

Sayeth the party elder who was respectful enough to both candidates to withhold his endorsement until it didn't look as though it was an effort to push one out and also now looks like an unqualified and genuine endorsement for the one who's still in:

A few hours from now I will step on stage in Detroit, Michigan to announce my support for Senator Barack Obama. From now through Election Day, I intend to do whatever I can to make sure he is elected President of the United States.

Over the next four years, we are going to face many difficult challenges -- including bringing our troops home from Iraq, fixing our economy, and solving the climate crisis. Barack Obama is clearly the candidate best able to solve these problems and bring change to America.
What that doesn't do: Shit all over Hillary Clinton. What it does do: Praise Barack Obama. And shit all over John McCain. As well it should. Because he's a belligerent, no-knowing, lobbied-up asshole who needs to be kept as far away from the White House as possible. But I digress.

In related news, Obama has hired former Clinton campaign manager Patti Solis Doyle as "the chief of staff to the vice presidential candidate—whoever he (or she) will be." That strikes me as a weird hiring move, only because it seems as though whoever the veep candidate is would want to bring on her/his own chief of staff, but evidently Obama wants to bring Solis Doyle into the campaign (presumably both because she's talented and because she's a prominent Latina) and "most of the major roles in Mr. Obama's campaign are filled."

Additionally, the Obama campaign has hired John Kerry's 2004 communications director, Stephanie Cutter, as Michelle Obama's chief of staff. Cutter will fill a key position, as she will be "lead[ing] a war room to fight attacks against Mrs. Obama." Big job, unfortunately.

Open Wide...

Iowa Flood: How You Can Help

Whenever I read about a natural disaster in the news, I think -- like most people would, I guess -- about the people I know who might be affected. Usually, if I know anyone in the area that got hit, a quick e-mail or phone call finds that they and all their loved ones are fine. So when I e-mailed a friend who lives in Iowa City the other day, I was expecting to hear pretty much that.

Instead, I heard this:

Thanks for checking in, dude. Things are bad--my mom lost her house, my stepdad lost his house, my sister and her husband, who lived at my mom's, lost all their stuff.

The only good thing is that the water crested yesterday, so it's not going to get higher. My mom's house is apparently still standing (with water well into her second story--and her first story is raised 8 feet above the ground), but some of the neighbors' houses are totally just gone.

Right now we're trying to find housing for the four of them, but it's hard. All the leases end at the end of July and local landlords are being fuckheads about helping flood victims with flexible leasing or month-to-months.

But besides that everything's fine. I'm not being snarky. We really are fine, just kind of shaken and stressed. We're healthy and my mom and stepdad have flood insurance (most of the victims of this flood don't) so they'll be able to rebuild their homes quite easily when the water clears out.


I asked her if there's anything people can do, beyond the obvious. Are there charities besides the Red Cross that seem to be doing good stuff on the ground? Anything I could use my little bloggy megaphone to promote?

She replied:

I haven't heard of anyone else taking donations so far, other than Red Cross. I know the last time the river flooded, the Mennonites did a ton of rebuilding for people. I have no reason to think they won't be helping this time too. It's just that rebuilding is still a few months out. But their work is especially important for people who did not have insurance and who will not have money to hire contractors to rebuild. The Mennonite Disaster Service website is here.

Other than that, there's not a lot to be done. Maybe watch the news and, if your readers are in the area, come down for what is sure to be a monumental clean-up for the cities of Iowa City and Cedar Rapids after the waters completely recede. I mean, the sandbags alone are going to be a total mess.

Then later, she forwarded me an e-mail from none other than Barack Obama, suggesting the following:

If you are able to assist in flood relief efforts, there are many ways to help your neighbors in Iowa. Here are some resources to get involved:

  • Call 2-1-1:When you call 2-1-1, you can receive information on flood-related assistance, including road closings, evacuation and shelter information. Opportunities to help are available by zip code, so anyone can find out where to help near their home.

  • Iowa Concern Hotline:
    Volunteer hotline for people who wish to help in recovery efforts.
    1-800-447-1985

  • Iowa City Flood Hotline:
    319-887-6202

  • Johnson County Emergency Management:
    319-356-6028

  • Salvation Army Emergency Disaster Service Program -- Cedar Rapids: 319-378-0337

Shakers, if you have any other suggestions, please leave them in comments. One thing I do know as a fat activist is that where donations of clothing are needed, plus-size clothes are almost always in short supply. So if you have some larger clothes lying around, that might be one place to start.

Update: Red Cross is handling the clothing donations, and apparently only drop-offs. If you're in the area and want to donate, call (800) 733-2767 to make sure they're still looking for what you've got. (My guess is, yes, they'll be looking for stuff above a size 16 for women, at least.)

Laurie suggested contacting the Humane Society to see about helping homeless pets. My guess here is that foster homes near the area will be especially helpful, since so many people are moving into temporary housing where pets aren't allowed.

And Tom Hilton in comments offered this link for info on where volunteer sandbaggers and the like are needed.

Open Wide...

Quote of the Day

"Hulk. Smash. Yes. Smash. Big Hulk smash. Smash cars. Buildings. Army tanks. Hulk not just smash. Hulk also go rarrr! Then smash again. Smash important, obviously. Smash Hulk's USP. What Hulk smash most? Hulk smash all hope of interesting time in cinema. … Critic exit cinema miffed. Film take away two hours of critic's life. Critic not get time back. Ever. Rarrrrr."Peter Bradshaw, reviewing The Incredible Hulk for The Guardian.

[Via Chris.]

Open Wide...

Tom Colicchio: Top Chef—and Closet Feminist

Chef Tom Colicchio has always been one of my favorite parts of Top Chef, because of his firm mentorship and wry humor and, let's be honest, because he's a guy who looks like he's been in a bar fight defending the principle of a thing, and that makes my water boil, if you catch my culinary drift. But discovering that Chef Colicchio is a closet feminist? Well, my pot boileth over.

First of all, check out his using the term "the Hillary factor" in a positive way, while talking about why he thinks Richard didn't claim the title of Top Chef:

Of our final three, Richard had the most experience, the most imagination, and by far the most technical proficiency. He had consistently wowed us during the season, and frankly, this was his competition to lose. So what happened? In short, he choked. My sense is that Richard lacked that last little bit of grit that causes one to hang in there, no matter what. Call it the "Hillary" factor.
Oh. Muh. Guh. Invoking a comparison to Hillary with her resolute determination as something to live up to? Something for a dude to live up to? Why, Chef Colicchio, you'll positively send me to the fainting couch with that kind of talk!

But he was only getting started.

I am glad Stephanie won because I hope it will encourage a new generation of women to follow in her footsteps and in the footsteps of other important women cooking today like Lydia Bastianich, Elena Arzak, Hélène Darroze, and April Bloomfield. And even though their numbers are growing, women as a rule are still a significant minority in the uppermost reaches of the culinary world.

It used to be for lack of opportunity, but I don't think that still applies today. None of the great American chefs (or at least not the ones I respect) have a glass ceiling in their restaurants. Quite the opposite: We like to hire women because they work hard without any of the competitive, macho bulls**t you often see among their male counterparts. The women I've hired help each other, don't jockey for position, and work until they drop. So if the opportunities for advancement that make up the early part of a top chef's career are there, why aren't women availing themselves of them?

Because the perception of opportunity, on the part of women themselves, hasn't kept pace. Women are reluctant to enter the culinary world because they believe (and this is not unjustified) that a cooking career is incompatible with raising children, which leaves those of us who want to hire, promote, and mentor women with a slimmer field to choose from than we'd like. And to an extent, they're right: The bottom line is our society does not yet provide women in the workplace with the type of social supports, like high-quality subsidized child care or extended parental leave, that allows them to fully go for it, and the impact this has on the scope and depth of a career is profound. Right or wrong, men plunge into their careers without much thought about how they'll navigate the work/family balance. They assume someone -- spouse, parent, paid caregiver -- will materialize to take care of it (and usually someone does.) This one assumption opens up an entire world of possibility to a young person in a way that can't be overstated. Ask yourself how many female Ferran Adrias, Thomas Kellers, or Joel Robuchons have chosen a different path -- say, catering or opening a bakeshop -- because it seems more family friendly?
Now, I grant you, there are some generalizations there—not all women get to work for just the chefs he respects, not all women are team players, not all women want to have babies, etc.—but, broadly speaking (pun intended), he hits some good notes here, especially with regard to how this is not just a problem for women to solve, or just a problem for chefs/restaurateurs to solve, but a problem that requires a societal shift in our thinking. And, beyond that, he's asking us to acknowledge male privilege—because what is the ability to launch a career without any significant thought to how parenting might impede it if not perhaps the ultimate privilege?

So, despite a couple of missteps there, it's awesome to see a guy in his position, by which I mean both at the top of his profession but also in the public eye, using that platform to talk about this stuff.

And then he ends with this:
But let's be clear: Stephanie didn't win this season because it was time for a woman to win. That would have been patronizing, and an insult to her and all of this season's chefs who worked so hard. Stephanie won because she deserved it.
Blub.

And, before I wrap up, I want to go back to Richard for just a moment. Richard was probably the #2 favorite, behind Stephanie, at Shakesville during the Top Chef Open Threads this season, and it wasn't just because of his talent—it was because he was a really decent guy. In one of the finest moments ever on the show IMO, he asked to share his win with Stephanie on a team challenge ("Wedding Wars") after she made a significant contribution he felt was central to the win (the wedding cake).

One of the reasons I recommend to male feminist allies speaking up when your boss credits you with an idea that's really your female coworker's is because it's so pervasive. I've seen that happen more times than I can count; I've had it done to me plenty of times. I've even seen male allies pick up women's thoughts from comments threads here, in which they've been involved, and later post them as their own without attribution, perhaps not even consciously. It's one of those "invisible" bits of sexism that can really hinder women.

So to see Richard so selflessly recognize the contribution of his female teammate to share the win with her was fantastic—and a lovely bit of practical feminism. Thank you, Chef Blais.

And congratulations again, Chef Izard.

[H/T to Feminist Finance.]

Open Wide...

Monday Blogaround

Sock it to me, Shakers!

Recommended Reading:

Anne Onne: Advice for Men Commenting on Feminist Websites and Blogs (Bookmark this one; I have a feeling we're going to be linking to it a lot around here.)

Mark: I completed the AIDS LifeCycle 7 ride.

Astraea: I Thought I Was Past the Crying Stage

Aulelia: Because Love is Aspirational

Meowser: Tim Russert, and Why I'm Done with Daily Kos Forever

Kristen: No Insurance for a Caesarean?

Yeoman Pip: So, we have come full circle then?

Leave your links in comments.

Open Wide...

From the Mailbag

Lots of good stuff recommended via email over the weekend…

Shaker Nancy passes on this tidbit about a theory that it's women's periods who give them a longer life expectancy than men because "the hormone endogenous estradiol, which is released during the menstrual cycle and in pregnancy, 'provokes marked cardiovascular changes.' It increases the cardiac output to a degree that mimics the effect of cardio exercise. In other words, this researcher says having a period year in and year out, over time, creates a stronger heart." Which, if correct, questions the wisdom of no-period birth control.

Shaker Linmeister recommends this "beautiful rant on Fox News, Michelle Malkin and Baby Mama."

Shaker JMonkey sends this video (via TPM) of his senator (Gordon Smith, OR) "saying that he voted against same-sex marriage rights because if you define marriage, people will be driven into the wilderness just like the Mormons. Or something like that."

Shaker Ethnicwoman passes on this story from Der Spiegel about a German toymaker who "has paid the ultimate tribute to presidential hopeful Barack Obama by immortalizing him in the form of a collector's doll" but "admits that it was tricky to get the skin tone correct." Um, yeah. Says Ethnicwoman, "Reminds me of this sketch starring Sammy Davis Jr. from the Carol Burnett Show." Totally.

Shaker Emily sends this video—a 14-minute YouTube documentary produced by Planned Parenthood about "the ONLY North Dakota abortion clinic." This is exactly what I'm talking about when I say that using Roe as a cudgel to beat feminists into line during elections isn't working anymore, because people who are paying attention know there are large swaths of the country for which a constant fight for accessible legal abortion is already a reality.

Shaker Midnight C emails this item (video here) of a female sports broadcaster being subjected to comments on her dress by male colleagues. A perfect example of how professional women are reminded in big and small ways every day that they are women first, colleagues second.

Shaker Jakob sends on some good news: British army to allow uniforms at gay pride march. Cool!

And more good news care of Shaker ASharpie1: Lesbian couple of 55 years ready to say 'I do'. That's so awesome it's like a ginormous awesome thing with lots of little awesome bits all over it.

Open Wide...

I Should Probably Just Go Back to Bed

An auspicious beginning to the week: I washed my cell phone in the washing machine.

I wish I could say it was something as reasonable as forgetting to check the pocket of my jeans, but it was significantly dumber than that. I carried my cell phone downstairs on the top of the pile of laundry in the basket, then, approximately 30 seconds after putting it there, forgot and dumped it into the washer with the rest of the contents of the basket.

It was maybe a minute into the cycle when I couldn't find my phone that I realized what I'd done and fished it out.

It's nice and clean now, but it doesn't want to work. I suspect that has something to do with the screen bearing a distinct resemblance to an aquarium—minus the fish.

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime

Make a Wish



The host, Tom Chapin, is Harry Chapin's brother.

Open Wide...

Happy Fathers' Day



Papa Shakes and Me, May 1977

Happy Fathers' Day to all the Shaker fathers (and grandfathers, and godfathers, and uncles) whose love and care, for the fortunate among us, made us who we are.

Thank you, Papa Shakes, for always making sure I had the things I need, and for running behind me when I was learning to ride a bike and knowing just when to let go of the seat, and for letting me be weird, and for teaching me how to hold a golf club, and for never being critical of the way I look, and for loving me even when I fuck up or annoy you, and a million other things. I love you.

Open Wide...

The Virtual Pub Is Open



TFIF, Shakers!

Belly up to the bar
and name your poison!

Open Wide...

Friday Pet Blogging

It's a nice afternoon for a nap.
(and to sleep with your tongue out, if you're a kitteh)



Zoë says: Seriously, you can stop with the pictures now.

Open Wide...