News from Shakes Manor

[Email edition.]

Liss: OMG!

Britons are losing their grip on reality, according to a poll out Monday which showed that nearly a quarter think Winston Churchill was a myth while the majority reckon Sherlock Holmes was real.

The survey found that 47 percent thought the 12th century English king Richard the Lionheart was a myth. And 23 percent thought World War II prime minister Churchill was made up. The same percentage thought Crimean War nurse Florence Nightingale did not actually exist.

Three percent thought Charles Dickens, one of Britain's most famous writers, is a work of fiction himself. Indian political leader Mahatma Gandhi and Battle of Waterloo victor the Duke of Wellington also appeared in the top 10 of people thought to be myths.

Meanwhile, 58 percent thought Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's fictional detective Holmes actually existed; 33 percent thought the same of W. E. Johns' fictional pilot and adventurer Biggles.
Gandhi fake; Sherlock Holmes real! What do you think about that, lol?

Mr. Shakes: I am so tired of people's stupidity that it makes me want to kill the world.

Liss: I'm blogging that.

Open Wide...

What's Wrong With This Story?

See if you can spot the problem here:

Police have been stopping cars as part of an operation to find witnesses after a woman was brutally raped in Fife [Scotland].

The victim was attacked by three men in a disused quarry at Orebridge near Thornton on Hogmanay.

Detectives from Fife Constabulary said the assault was totally unprovoked. They have been trying to trace the men, who were all aged between 20 and 30.

An incident bus has been set up close to the scene and officers have been trying to jog the memories of drivers.
Did you find it yet?

If not, here's a question to ask yourself, which will also serve as a helpful hint: Exactly what is it a woman could do that would constitute provoking three men to gang rape her?

Actually, that's a pretty damn good question for the detectives from the Fife Constabulary, too. Given that they felt compelled to specify that this rape wasn't provoked, it would necessarily follow that they believe that some rapes are. Possibly, it was merely a trick of the reporting (Q: Was this attack provoked? A: Absolutely not. Translation: Detectives said the assault was totally unprovoked.), but based on Scotland's shamefully dismal less than 4% conviction rate on rape cases, and the British penchant for victim-blaming (which is as bad if not worse than our own), I wouldn't be remotely surprised if it was, in fact, not a misrepresented sentiment.

For the one billionth (or so) time, let me break down the stupidity of victim-blaming and expose it for the despicable rape apology that it is: Left to my own devices, I never would have been raped. The rapist was really the key component to the whole thing. I was sober; hardly scantily clad, I was wearing sweatpants and an oversized t-shirt; I was at home; my sexual history was, literally, nonexistent—I was a virgin; I struggled; I said no. There have been times since when I have been walking home, alone, after a few drinks, wearing something that might have shown a bit of leg or cleavage, and I wasn't raped. The difference was not in what I was doing. The difference was the presence of a rapist.

Enough blaming the victim. Enough.

(Thanks to Shaker Lynsey for the heads-up.)

Open Wide...

On Your Mark, Get Set…


It's officially a footrace to the finish.

The CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll has Clinton and Obama "virtually tied" going into Superduperpooper Tuesday, as does the Reuters/C-SPAN/Zogby poll. According to the polls, Obama has expanded his lead in California and is closing in on Clinton's lead in NY.

Michael Chabon goes for Obama. Erica Jong goes for Hillary.

Krugman spends his column reminding us that "the principal policy division between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama involves health care" and takes another look at the key differences between the plans.

Meanwhile, McCain continues to give conservatives heartburn. Not to mention his Republican colleagues. This probably isn't helping.

Donkey 2008.

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime

The Flash

Open Wide...

XLII


Congrats to the Giants!






disclaimer: I was really hoping they'd win just so I could post this from "Madagascar". I kept hearing it in my head when they scored, LOL.

Open Wide...

Who Among Us Hasn't Asked This Very Question While Hawking Postage Machines


Via Reborn at Vintage Ads: "1953: Husband furious because you've missed the post? The Pitney-Bowes Postage Meter prints the stamp and seals the envelope all in one go."

We've come a long way, baby!

Open Wide...

I feel pretty and witty and...



Click image to see entire ad in new window. Via.

Open Wide...

Smashing the Lowest Glass Ceiling

You go, Ms. G, lol!

Open Wide...

Frozen Grand Central Station

From Improv Everywhere, a group dedicated to causing scenes of chaos and joy in public places: "On a cold Saturday in New York City, the world's largest train station came to a sudden halt. Over 200 Improv Everywhere Agents froze in place at the exact same second for five minutes in the Main Concourse of Grand Central Station. Over 500,000 people rush through Grand Central every day, but today, things slowed down just a bit as commuters and tourists alike stopped to notice what was happening around them."


I love the onlookers' spontaneous applause at the end. "We don't know what the hell that was, but it was fookin' cool!"

Thanks to Shaker YeomanPip for passing that along. If you can't view the video, click here.

Open Wide...

Dear Mississippi: Kindly Keep Your Shit-Ass Laws Out of My Digestive Tract. Love, Meowser

Hi, I'm Meowser, a hetero fatass in her 40s, born in Brooklyn, New York, currently living in Portland, Oregon with a trio of fat cats and an adorable skinny boyfriend. I transcribe medical records for money, and write songs, sing and record them for an avocation. My bloghome is Fat Fu. Enjoy!

For years, I have been telling people -- only half kidding around -- that the reason I don't diet (that is, restrict food in the hope of losing weight) is because one of these days, I will not be allowed to purchase the food and drink I like because of the size of my ass, the way the worldwide nannystate is going. I actually marvel that I can go into Burgerville and order a chocolate hazelnut milkshake while they're in season, hand them money for it, and they'll actually give it to me, no questions asked, at least for now.

(And in case you must know, I've done that exactly once in the last month, and it was a small, without whipped cream because I don't like it. I am not a major fast food consumer, honest girlscout. But boy, those shakes are goooood.)

So really, I shouldn't have been as shocked to my foundations as I was to read Sandy Szwarc's article on Junkfood Science the other day about a new bill, HB 282, proposed by a trio of Mississippi legislators (two Republicans, W.T. Mayhall, Jr. and John Read, and one Democrat, Bobby Shows) that would keep "obese" people (as defined by state law) from being served food in all restaurants with five seats or more.

Yeah, that's right -- since they can't legally keep people with dark skin out of their eateries down there anymore, they'll do the next best thing, which is to keep people with a lot of skin out of them. Who often, coincidentally, have...dark skin also. Yeah. Coincidentally. Even I didn't smell that one approaching, and I have a nose like a cat. (I do not know for sure that the sponsors of this bill had racial overtones consciously in mind, but they had to expect that someone would notice them.)

This sounds like a joke, but it isn't. Someone is proposing an actual segregation law. For real. And it didn't get laughed out of committee. Because fatties are hated that much, even by themselves. (Take a look at John Read's picture, and tell me self-loathing isn't involved in this one.)

Sandy Szwarc, anxious to believe the entire thing was a hoax, called up Rep. Mayhall, the bill's lead author and asked about it, and he assured her that he was as serious as, well, diabetes (which all of us fatasses are of course guaranteed to get by age 50 if we don't change our wicked wicked ways, lack of familial diabetic history be damned). You see, all Rep. Mayhall (a retired pharmaceutical salesman) cares about is saving us from ourselves:

He said that while, regrettably, he doesn't believe his bill will pass, this is serious. He wrote it, he said, because of the "urgency of the obesity crisis and need for government action." He hopes it will "call attention to the serious problem of obesity and what it is costing the Medicare system."
Riiiiight. Because you'll "cost the Medicare system" so much less frying chicken for yourself at home in lard than you will having macrobiotic stirfries in sitdown vegan restaurants. Under the terms of this "bill," you can get Pizza Hut to deliver all the stuffed crust, quadruple-meat, 1000-calorie-per-slice pizzas you want, but enjoying a hamachi roll in a sushi place is out of the question. Buy tons of ribs and sweet potato pie from that takeout truck, no problem, that's so much better for you than moo goo gai pan. Or salad. Or tandoori. Or anything that will be consumed where (gasp) people can see you. Because that's what amps up your cholesterol count and your blood sugar and your blood pressure, being watched by elderly lipophobic white dudes while your fat ass is eating in public.

Of course it won't pass. Twenty-nine percent of Mississippi's population is "obese" according to BMI data, and that's not even counting people who visit or do business in the state. By that law, not only would restaurants have to agree to voluntarily cut their customer base by nearly a third, but someone staying at a hotel would have to agree to be weighed and measured before they could get room service from the hotel's restaurant. Fat people could not participate in business or civic luncheons or even attend weddings or rehearsal dinners unless they were privately catered by groups not affiliated with a sitdown restaurant. Thousands of restaurant and tourist workers would be unemployed.

And I'm sure I'm only skimming the surface of the potential 18-wheeler wreck here. Never mind the civil rights aspect of this, they'd be slitting their throats financially if this were allowed to pass. This is one poor state; they're not going to agree to make themselves unnecessarily poorer.

But that's not the point. The point is that someone thought it was okay to do this. It wasn't automatic career suicide for them to propose such a bill, which it would be if they wanted to restrict access to any other group of people based on their physical appearance. That means they (or someone else) can do it again on a lesser scale, and they probably will.

And that means fat people need to wake up and realize that this really is a goddamned witch hunt, and we are all witches. Yes, they mean YOU. Not that other person you think is "hugely obese," not just the people who are fat because they really do suffer from disordered eating -- they really do mean YOU. They don't give a flying fuck how "good" you think you're being. They don't care if you "intend" to get thin. They don't give a tinker's goddamn if you just bought a gym membership and you're really going to go four times a week this time like you promised. And they sure as hell don't care if Paxil put 40 pounds on you and pushed your BMI over 30 despite eating less than you did before. They. do. not. care. There are no "good fatties" in the haters' universe. They mean YOU, and you are one of US, no matter how much you protest to the contrary. If they came for all the fatasses tomorrow, you would be included, even if all you ate for the last week was celery and unsweetened soymilk. So you might as well work with those of us who are trying to make life better for fat people as they are, and not against us.

And attention all politicians (and yes, I'm including pretty much the entire crop of current presidential candidates in this): We did not "ask" to be fat. In fact, with rare exceptions, even if we DID ask to be fat permission would not be granted, if our chromosomes have made us a naturally thin person. Most of us are not fat because we don't know the "right" way to eat or exercise, or because we've never tried to "slim down." Many of us know "the rules" out the yang and have tried and tried and tried to be thinner since we were very young, but it simply has not worked. All bodies do not respond in exactly the same way to weight-reduction attempts. Some of us will ultimately get sicker than thinner people and some of us won't. But you are not going to make us healthier by shaming us and sending us to our rooms with a bagful of lettuce.

If you care about "saving the Medicare system money," ignore the scale, ignore BMI, it's just not all that relevant except at the tiniest subpercentile extremes. Know this: The more people attempt to lose weight, the fatter they get, and the worse their health tends to be. And oftentimes you can do everything "right" and get sick anyway, because there's a lot more to health than individual behavior. Clean up the environment. Help reduce people's socioeconomic stress levels so that they're manageable and reasonable. Make good quality food and safe space to move around available to absolutely everyone.

And then butt out. "Keep your laws off my body" means keeping them out of the inside of my body, too. Maybe then you won't see a nation of skinnies, but I'll bet you the fat people who do exist will be way the fuck healthier, including mentally.

Open Wide...

Nerdz

[Snipped from an IM conversation I am currently having with my friend J]

J: I ran this cool diagnostic on my computer called windirstat and it color codes all the files on your computer and groups them into visuals of what files take up the most space on your hard drive... I had 50 gigs worth of music on the computer alone. Jeebus. Is that geeky enough?

M: Hugely so. Mine would show 50 gigs worth of photoshopped John McCain pictures.

Open Wide...

The Virtual Pub Is Open



TFIF, Shakers!

Belly up to the bar,
and name your poison!

Open Wide...

Michael Savage Loses It

I know I've said as much before, but it would appear that Michael Savage has finally gone off the deep end. Get this:

Summary: On The Savage Nation, a caller identified by Michael Savage as "Kojo" asked Savage: "[D]o you know how the AIDS got there [Africa]?" Savage responded: "It got there because it was spread from eating green monkey meat, my friend. If you study the science -- but I don't think you have the capacity to understand science, my dear friend Kojo." Later, Savage stated: "See, we don't live in Africa where people settle arguments with machetes. We live in a country where we settle it with arguments. Something you apparently don't know anything about. ... Couldn't use the machete so his mind went blank. There, that's what we got. There's multiculturalism for you. There's immigration for you. There's the new America for you. Bring them in by the millions. Bring in 10 million more from Africa. Bring them in with AIDS. Show how multicultural you are. They can't reason, but bring them in with a machete in their head. Go ahead. Bring them in with machetes in their mind."

It gets even worse at the link, if you can believe it. I don't recommend reading it; it's brain-rotting.

"Macaca" and "nappy headed hos" are apparently not enough for Michael Savage; he has to take yowling racism one step further. Which brings to mind the question that apparently everyone but Talk Radio Network and Savage's apeshit listeners are wondering: Why the hell does Michael Savage still have a job?

Open Wide...

Which is More Important?

Exhibit A: Ezra Klein's analysis of Obama's proposed health care plan.

In the end, his plan is not universal, does not attempt to be, and is probably less generous in its affordability provisions than Clinton's. And even so, I wouldn't really care, as it's still a pretty good plan, except that he's decided to respond to the inadequacies of his own policy by fear-mongering against not only better policy, but the type of policy he's probably going to have to eventually adopt. It's very, very short-sighted.
Exhibit B: MoveOn's endorsement of Obama.
With hundreds of thousands of ballots cast across the country, for the first time in MoveOn's history, we've voted together to endorse a presidential candidate in the primary. That candidate is Barack Obama.
I'm pretty hard pressed to find a reason to care about MoveOn's endorsement of anyone, yet this appears to be the bigger news of the two that's making the rounds.

Open Wide...

Martha, Get Me to the Fainting Couch


'Appalling Gap' Found in Homeland Defense Readiness:
The U.S. military is not prepared to meet catastrophic threats at home, and it is suffering from an "appalling gap" in forces able to respond to chemical, biological and nuclear strikes on U.S. soil, according to a congressional commission report released yesterday.

The situation is rooted in severe readiness problems in National Guard and reserve forces, which would otherwise be well-suited to respond to domestic crises but lack sufficient personnel and training, as well as $48 billion in equipment because of deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan, according to a report by the Commission on the National Guard and Reserves.
Hmm, you know, I'm pretty sure someone told me about this catastrophic clusterfuck of a national security infrastructure before…who was it? What was her name again…?

Oh yeah.

Katrina.

Open Wide...

Random YouTubery: The Bastard Fairies

"We're All Going To Hell"



Thanks to Shaker Mychii for passing that along.

Open Wide...

Rest of the World: "Are We There Yet?!"

I know we covered this topic before, but I really enjoy hearing of citizens from other countries who can't wait to throw Bush out on his ass:

After eight years of President Bush, the latest mantra in U.S. politics — "transformational change" — is resonating across the rest of a planet desperate for a fresh start.

"They feel there's a real chance to work with the U.S.," said Julianne Smith, a senior fellow at the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies. "America's image in the world is really on the line."

Non-Americans, she said, are looking for someone who can "restore faith in the United States."
Legacy Larry is still having trouble getting his head around the fact no one in the world, not even Republican candidates, gives a flying fuck anymore about anything he has to spew.

Oh sure, he's still got "yes people" telling him otherwise, and I'm sure there will be a fringe group of dipshits who will still massage his feet and sacrifice their first born to him long after he's out of our collective head. But those folks are well in the minority, where they now belong.

As a Shakesville public service, I'll do Bush a favor and spell it out for him:

YOU ARE NO LONGER RELEVANT.

RESISTANCE IS FUTILE.

Open Wide...

Still Talking. Still Wrong.

Yesterday, in Las Vegas, President Bush gave a speech on the Global War on Terror. It was quite a speech, chock full o' the usual Bushety goodness, but there's one passage in particular I'd like to highlight—and I would recommend donning your Irony Crash Helmets and Rhetorical Whiplash Braces before reading it. Also, although I've broken it apart with my inserted commentary, it is one continuous passage without edits. Here we go:

The world in which we live is a dangerous world, but a world full of great opportunity. We're involved in an ideological struggle -- the likes of which we have seen before in our history. It's an ideological struggle between those of us who love freedom and human rights and human dignity, and those who want to impose their dark vision on how people should live their lives.
This from the man who cut short his brush-clearin' vacation to intercede in the private family matter of Terri Schiavo's living will, from the man who does not support reproductive choice, from the man who supported a Constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage, et cetera. Insert your own jokes here.

This is a -- not a political conflict -- I mean, a religious conflict.
Clear as mud. Tell us why, oh wise one.

And I'll tell you why: because one of the tactics, and the main tactic of those enemies of freedom, is to murder the innocent to achieve their objectives. Religious people do not murder the innocent.
In the words of our great modern philosopher, Shark-fu: Blink. As far as I can tell, Bush is using the same circular logic that prompts people to suggest that people who do, by their defintion, bad things in the name of Christianity aren't real Christians, or leads suddenly-disgruntled conservatives to suggest that Bush isn't a real conservative, now that he's sullied conservatism's good name (cough). Bush's awesome argument is that religion prohibits murder, so anyone who murders isn't religious. But that is, of course, bullshit. Certainly a Christian shouldn't be arguing that sin undermines one's religiosity, when forgiveness for sin is a cornerstone of his religion, which recognizes humans to be serial transgressors. If every religious person who sinned was excommunicated, the church would be one damn empty place.

And so we're facing this ideological struggle of people who use asymmetrical warfare. What distinguishes this ideological struggle from previous ideological struggles -- those with -- against fascism or communism, is that in this war, individuals use weapons to kill innocent people -- car bombs and suicide vests.
Hmm. Apparently, our president thinks no innocent people were killed during the struggle against fascism. What the fucking fuck is he talking about? Either this explains why he thought bombing Auschwitz was a hot idea, or he's suffering from the misapprehension that gas chambers aren't weapons, or, incredibly, his point is literally that the distinguishing factor between the Global War on Terror and WWII is the existence of "individuals" killing people, which would be dependent on his believing that in the whole of institutionally anti-Semitic Nazi Germany during the war, there were no individual Germans who engaged in murderous vigilantism against scapegoated Jews.

Okay, in all seriousness, I know what the bumbling moron is trying to say. He's trying to say that the difference between, for example, WWII and the GWOT is the lack in the latter of state-sanctioned armies. True that. Which is why reasonable, rational, thoughtful, pragmatic people repeatedly suggest that fighting terrorists with our military as though it's a war is a stupid idea, and what we need is a good, strong law enforcement response with strategic use of light military.

Take it away, Concern Troll-in-Chief:

And they do so to frighten the West. They do so to create chaos and confusion. They do so with the aim of creating vacuums into which their hateful ideology can flow. And that's why you see the September 11th attacks, in London, in Madrid, in Jordan -- attacks around the world. Some will say these are just isolated moments of -- where all we need is a good, strong law enforcement response. I think they're all part of an ideological struggle.
See how silly and wrong I am? Because terror strikes are connected by an ideology, law enforcement doesn't work. You need to go to war! Don't ask why. Don't point out that makes no sense whatsoever. Just shut up. He's the decider.

And the interesting development that is taking place in the beginnings here of the 21st century is, the freedom movement is on the march.
Oh indeed. It most certainly is.

I'm not surprised, and you shouldn't be either. I believe there is an Almighty. I believe the gift of that Almighty to every man, woman and child is freedom.
We'll be free of him in 353 days, Shakers.

Open Wide...

From Sarah to Jimmy (with love, of course)

Necessary background prior to viewing the following video:

1. Sarah Silverman and Jimmy Kimmel have been going out for like 5-6 years now.

2. Jimmy Kimmel often states at the close of his show, "Our apologies to Matt Damon, we ran out of time."



Via Michael K

Open Wide...

Today in Baghdad

I do not have the words to express how this makes me feel:

Remote-controlled explosives strapped to two mentally retarded women detonated in a coordinated attack on Baghdad pet bazaars Friday, Iraqi officials said, killing at least 73 people in the deadliest day since the U.S. sent 30,000 extra troops to the capital last spring.
Stupid. Fucking. War.

Open Wide...