Coulter Will Campaign for Clinton if McCain's the Nominee

She's totally talking shit, as per usual, but this is hilarious: Ann Coulter tells Sean Hannity that she would sooner vote for Hillary Clinton than for John McCain, because she so desperately doesn't want him to be the GOP nominee. Mind you, she totally misrepresents both Hillary Clinton and John McCain to go off on this little tirade, but it's still fucking great. Why? Because I'm sitting over here feeling pretty good about our nominee, no matter who it is! Meanwhile, Ann Coulter would sooner vote for Clinton than the likely Republican nominee.


"I will campaign for her if it's McCain! … She isn't going to be a weak woman; compared to John McCain, she'll be better. … She lies less than John McCain; she's smarter than John McCain, so when she gets caught shamelessly lying, at least the Clintons know they've been caught lying. McCain is so stupid, he doesn't even know he's been caught. … Yes [I will vote for Hillary] if it's close, and the candidate is John McCain, because John McCain is not only bad for Republicanism, which he definitely is; he is bad for the country. He is very, very bad for the country."

---------------------

Btw, this little teleplay also indicates against whom the Republicans don't want to run—and it's Hillary Clinton. When they send out Coulter to try to convince everyone how conservative she is, it's so that we won't vote for her, not so that they will. Interesting.

Open Wide...

Mutants Represent!



(Explanation here.)

Btw, if you've ever wondered what your blogmistress looks like head-to-toe, I look almost exactly like The Rotund, who took a full-length picture of herself the other day that was like looking in a mirror. Except I don't have a full-length mirror, or I'd have posted the same shot just to show what doppelgangers we are.

But here I am tucked in perfectly beneath a window ledge on the exterior of a Royal Bank of Scotland branch in Edinburgh:


"You're the one for me, fatty!"

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime

The Gobots

Open Wide...

Lost Open Thread

The only thing to which I can compare the level of my excited anticipation about this new episode is Beardy Jack and Unbeardy Jack both on the verge of orgasm at the exact same time.



"We's gonna esplode."

As always, thanks to Rachel for the screen caps.

(And don't read this thread if you want to avoid SPOILERS!!!)

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

What do you think is "the best fooking shoo in the histoory oof shoos"?

Aside from Lost (ZOMG 30 minutes!!!!11!!!eleventy-one!!!!), my favorite show is probably Twin Peaks. Tied with Extras.

Shortly behind: The Office (UK and US).

(Ensembles? Why, yes I do like them!)

Open Wide...

Straight Talkin' Cerberus: National Troll

Open Wide...

Huzzah!

Sources: Al Qaeda's No. 3 man killed.

I guess we've finally captured or killed all the number twos—so it's on to the number threes at long last!

Open Wide...

Know What's Hilarious?

Still rape. As ever!



The headline of an article promoting "Ladies' Night" at a bar in Manhattan.

My favorite part of this headline is that, in its desperation to make a hot rape joke like all the kewl kidz are making these days, it doesn't even make any sense. Drinks don't get raped. The "joke," exhorting guys to show up, should be, "Those Ladies Aren't Going to Date Rape Themselves!" If the "joke" had been made properly, perhaps it would have been obvious to its (female!) writer how resoundingly disgusting the sentiment actually is.

Then again, perhaps not. I probably shouldn't overestimate the compassion of anyone attempting to make rape jokes in the first place.

[Rape is Hilarious: Parts One, Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, Seven, Eight, Nine, Ten, Eleven, Twelve, Thirteen, Fourteen, Fifteen, Sixteen, Seventeen, Eighteen.]

Open Wide...

And Barney said, "Whatever, dude."

I just saw this headline at Raw Story in their BlogsMedia section: Bush to Barney: 'I'm open minded'.

An even though I'd already read the story reported at PageOneQ about Bush's exchange with Representative Barney Frank about his boyfriend, during which the president told the congressman that he was open-minded, I still read Bush to Barney: 'I'm open minded' and immediately figured Bush had had a heart-to-heart with his dog, i.e. Bush's most important Iraq advisor.

Open Wide...

Can't Wait


McCain, Giuliani headed to Tonight Show: "John McCain and Rudy Giuliani will appear together Thursday night on The Tonight Show With Jay Leno, a source close to the McCain campaign tells CNN. Giuliani dropped his own White House bid Wednesday and endorsed McCain, calling the Arizona senator a 'hero' who 'is prepared to be president'."

If they sing "Somewhere Out There," I'm gonna shit with glee. You know Giuliani totally wants to be Linda Ronstadt.

Open Wide...

Quote of the Day

"When conservative bloggers are defending Bill Clinton against bad journalism, you know the journalism has to be really bad."Steve Benen, correcting the record on Jake Tapper's shitastic piece suggesting Bill Clinton claimed that slowing economic growth was the solution to global warming, pretty much the exact opposite of what he said.

Open Wide...

Surge: Feel the Rush!

My fellow Soros minion Spencer Ackerman, now fully moved in at Minnesota Monitor's sister publication the Washington Independent, has taken a look at how the surge is doing these days. You remember, the surge? Won us Iraq finally, after our long nightmare of not winning Iraq? Stopped all violence? Has completely transformed Iraq into a paradise with flowers and chirping birds and butterflies and candy and democracy, whisky, sexy? That surge? Yeah, turns out those may not be permanent gains:

It used to be that surge enthusiasts would at least hint at the unachieved strategic objective of the surge. As Bush himself put it, the surge was meant to provide the Iraqi government "the breathing space it needs to make progress" on sectarian reconciliation. But reconciliation hasn’t happened, and, in important respects, sectarianism has deepened over the past year. So surgeniks are now simply declaring victory by the sheer fact of reduced violence itself, unmoored to any strategic goal.

But even accepting that lowered standard, there are growing signs of backsliding in Iraq—even before the surge brigades depart in July.

You mean that John McCain's unquestionably brilliant strategery to win the war in Iraq isn't working? No!

The Sunni insurgency, all but decimated in the imagination of the surge advocates, has demonstrated something of a surge of its own in recent weeks. Baghdad, Anbar and Diyala provinces, the hotbeds of the insurgency, have seen a return of high-profile suicide bombing. Prominent collaborators with the U.S., like the so-called "Concerned Local Citizens" militias, have been targeted for death by insurgents and terrorists. "Of late, though, as you’ve been seeing, is certainly an increase in the number of suicide events that occur with individuals, mostly with a suicide vest wrapped around their waist," Adm. Greg Smith, a spokesman for Multi-National Force-Iraq, said in a blogger conference call last week.

Iraq security statistics over the past 13 weeks, obtained exclusively by The Washington Independent, tell the tale. In Baghdad, improvised-explosive device (IED) detonations explosions in Baghdad have ticked up slightly to 131 in January from 129 in December—and the last week of January is not included in these latest figures. Countrywide, there was an increase in IED explosions to 2,291 in December from 1,394 in November, followed by a dip to 1,270 in the first three weeks of January. But the week ending on January 25 saw seven suicide explosions Iraq-wide, the most since the week ending Dec. 21, 2007.

Ackerman has always been a good reporter, and he's careful to remind us that one month does not a trend make. But this is indeed troubling. No, the surge hasn't done what it was supposed to do -- allow for real, concrete improvement in the Iraqi government's ability to govern -- but since it at least tamped down violence, it had some salutary effect. But if it only tamped down violence temporarily then it was, unquestionably, a total and abject failure. If these trends continue, those of us who opposed the surge in the first place will be proven right. Frankly, I was hoping to be proven wrong.

Open Wide...

Lost Lust


For the Losties among us, I have a post up at Newcritics, Lost Lust, about the best fooking shoo in the histoory oof shoos, which, in part recounts some of Tart's and my LOLcatted Lost greatest hits. There's also something for non-Losties who are secretly beginning to suspect that failing to watch it was a bad decision, too.

And our friend Neddie Jingo has already left a funny comment about abandoning his attempt to "interpret the whole Lost enchilada as a 'mere' allegory of the Enlightenment."

Open Wide...

Black. White. And asparagus. (A reprise)

(Once in a while, Liss asks me to repost the following entry, which was - I think - my very first post here. Kind of a TV Land-style revisit. Today I actually remembered...)

As happens occasionally, the larder at Casa Waveflux was lacking some essential items last night. I volunteered to brave the after-work crowds at the local supermarket and pick up a few things. I asked M what she wanted for dinner. "Spinach," she said. "And 'boeuf.'"

"Spinach and 'boeuf' it is," I said, and off I went.

The trick to early evening grocery shopping is a laser-like focus on the objective. Get it and get out. I grabbed a couple of Balance bars*, then guided the shopping cart to the asparagus. I love asparagus, but finding the right bundle of spears requires some attention. I rejected the first two candidates, then eyed a third which looked promising.

"Excuse me," said a voice to my left.

I turned to find myself facing an older white guy - perhaps sixty, sixty-five. He was casually dressed, had graying hair, glasses. He carried a plastic bag of some produce or other in his left hand. His expression seemed friendly enough. I thought at first that I was blocking his access to the asparagus and prepared to sidle over with a suitable "Excuse me." But it wasn't asparagus that the man had on his mind.

"I was listening to public radio this afternoon," he began.

I smiled expectantly, but my heart sank. I was about to be roped into a conversation. This is what happens when you let your guard down in the produce section. It's happened before.

"They had on two men from that black and white television show," the man continued.

Context is vitally important in impromptu social encounters. Given that this gentleman had heard about the show on NPR, and recently at that, and given the difference in our racial profiles, and given finally his very earnest expression, I knew that he wasn't referring to Leave It to Beaver. He could only be describing Black. White. , the FX race-swapping show. Oh, dear, I thought. The asparagus seemed suddenly far away.

My companion - whose name I never learned - went on to describe the exchange between these two men, one African-American and the other Italian-American, who ventured into the world guised as white and black respectively. They had returned with very different takes on the experience; my companion was highly distressed at the Italian-American man's seeming denial of racism in the culture, and he really, really wanted to tell somebody.

So he told me.

He was mystified that anyone, regardless of skin color, could go through life unaware of prejudice even if untouched by it him/herself, and asked me how that could possibly be. I said something about the difference in individual experiences that left people more or less equipped to recognize racism; I suggested that sometimes people come to such perceptions very late in life. He looked skeptical, but seemed to accept the possibility.

He went on to talk about the integration of Catholic schools here in St. Louis - seven years before Brown v. Board of Education, the work of Archbishop Cardinal Joseph Ritter - and the shock and resistance that the change produced in the community here. I know practically nothing about Ritter - just the name, really - but this was history that my companion had lived, and it had clearly left a profound impression on him.

At length, we parted company. I really had to finish my shopping and get dinner ready, I said. He gave me a rather hearty clap on the back, thanked me for talking to him, and away he went.

I picked out my asparagus and went on my way. Spinach and 'boeuf,' you know.

When I got home, I related the story to M, my wife - my white wife - and she laughed. "My people," she said, "can be very strange." She clearly considered the idea of picking out someone to represent all black people really odd.

And yeah, there's something to that. But hey, who's he going to talk to - George Bush? Conversation requires crossing lines, borders, barriers. As odd as it was, I'm glad he pulled me aside.

(Note: I no longer eat Balance bars.)

Open Wide...

Shaker Gourmet: Sugar-Free Chocolate Pudding

Sorry I'm late with getting this up! Our recipe this week comes from Shaker Arkades:

Sugar-Free Chocolate Pudding

1/2 cup cocoa powder
1/2 cup Splenda® brand sweetener
1/4 cup corn starch
1/4 cup nonfat dry milk
2 cups milk (I usually use skim)

Combine the dry ingredients in a saucepan and whisk until thoroughly blended. (According to the sugary recipe from which I adapted this sugar-free variant, the dry pudding mix can be stored for up to a month in an airtight container in the fridge, though I usually just mix up as much as I need, just as I need it.)

Add the milk to the dry ingredients in the saucepan and whisk until well mixed; there may be a few lumps of dry cocoa in the mix, but most of the powder should be moistened and have attained a liquid-like consistency.

Warm the saucepan over medium heat until the mixture reaches a simmer, whisking as needed. (Whisk constantly for absolute best results, though once every couple of minutes usually turns out fine until the pan is simmering.)

Once the mixture is simmering and has thickened slightly, reduce the heat and set a timer for the amount of time you wish to stir (see below) and begin whisking continuously to prevent the mixture from burning on the bottom of the saucepan.

Once the timer goes off, or as soon as your pudding has reached a desirable consistency, pour the hot pudding into containers with lids and place in the fridge for an hour or so to chill and 'set'. (Or, enjoy immediately as a sugar-free hot fudge topping. Yummy!) The pudding will thicken upon standing.

In the fridge, the pudding will thicken yet more, possibly gaining a toothsome 'soft fudge' consistency. There will probably be some condensed water (formerly steam) inside the containers when you dig them out of the fridge; I usually pour off the excess water rather than stir it back in because I prefer the firmer fudge-like texture.

SO HOW LONG SHOULD I STIR WHILE IT SIMMERS?

If you like a creamier pudding, stop stirring-and-simmering somewhere around the 3.5 - 4 minute mark; the texture will seem a bit too liquid at first, but should firm up to creamy as the pudding cools. If (like me) you prefer a thicker pudding that you can sink your teeth into (kind of like a soft-set fudge, really), keep stirring longer, somewhere between 4 and 5 minutes. The pudding will look like 'normal' creamy pudding as you pour and will firm up even more in the fridge to assume a fudgy semi-solid state. Chocolate bliss, with only a teensy bit of guilt!

Arkades notes, "This goes great with cashews, almonds, or walnuts, though of course it is thoroughly excellent all by itself!". If you'd like to participate in Shaker Gourmet, email me at: shakergourmet (at) gmail.com

Open Wide...

But We've Got the Biggest Balls of Them All

You know those faux testicles you can buy for your car, the ones that scream, "I have castration anxiety," "I am a misogynist douchehound," "I am the biggest doofus you have ever met," and "I have a tiny penis" all at the same time? You do? Good, because those things have now reached a transcendent level of horribly wrong.



That's right -- support your troops testes!

I frankly want to meet someone who would buy these. I want to meet them, and I want to ask them: rather than buying testicle helper, why not simply enlist, and show actual gonadal fortitude? Because if we're going with the colloquial misogynistic sense of the term -- and these guys most certainly are -- then you're not showing any balls by getting fake plastic ones for your car. You're pretty much demonstrating the opposite.

Via PZ, who says, "I swear, if I ever saw one of these on the freeway, it would be a traffic hazard because I'd be laughing and crying too hard to maintain proper control of my vehicle."

Open Wide...

Pant Pant

Open Wide...

Don't Worry about Ralph Nader

Following up on Melissa's post: so Ralph Nader is considering another White House run. Only bloggers will notice.

There's no point getting upset about this. Nader has the right to run if he wants. Anyone who wants to vote for him has the right to do so. In a democracy, any persons may seek public office for which they are legally qualified; and people may vote in any way they wish, for good reasons, bad reasons, or no reason. There's no point complaining about it, or pretending that the Democratic Party or any of its candidates are somehow owed anyone's vote; they never are. Votes always have to be earned, every time. That's the way democracies work. (N.B.: I'm not saying that Melissa has argued against any of these statements.)

There is also (and I realize this will be more controversial) no point in going over Nader's role in the Florida 2000 debacle again, as some of us will surely be tempted to do. Of course, Nader's candidacy was a factor in how things turned out there. So were the candidacies of about a half dozen other third-party candidates in that state that year, each of whom pulled more votes than the narrow distance between Bush and Gore.

But more importantly, going over Nader's role in Florida 2000 obscures the real lessons to be learned from that bizarre case: that the modern Republican Party will do anything to win, including breaking the law with gleeful abandon; and that they've got lots of help where it counts. Consider the defective butterfly ballot; a national media that refused to believe that Gore might have a case; the throwing of thousands of black voters off the rolls illegally; the Brooks Brothers riot; Katherine Harris and Brother Jeb their own selves; and the U.S. Supreme Court overturning the Florida Supreme Court when it had no business doing so. Amid all this Republican cheating, it seems odd to single out Nader or the Greens. And of course, when Nader ran again in 2004, he had no significant impact -- and yet similar shenanigans happened in Ohio, even with him more or less out of the picture.

So, let him run. Don't worry about it, and don't get distracted from the real problem, which is that there are going to be GOP dirty tricks everywhere this year, in a way that will make Florida 2000 and Ohio 2004 pale by comparison. And if McCain is the Republican nominee, as I think he will be, the media will attempt a coronation so undemocratic it would make James Baker blush with shame. There's your problem, not Ralph Nader.

Open Wide...

Over There: Bush's Rhetoric. Over Here: Reality. And Never the Twain Shall Meet.

Siun at Crooks and Liars:

In the SOTU Monday night, George Bush cheered on the "young democracy" in Afghanistan:
In Afghanistan, America, our 25 NATO allies and 15 partner nations are helping the Afghan people defend their freedom and rebuild their country. Thanks to the courage of these military and civilian personnel, a nation that was once a safe haven for al-Qaida is now a young democracy where boys and girls are going to school, new roads and hospitals are being built, and people are looking to the future with new hope.
Yet just six days ago a young Afghan reporter was sentenced to death in Afghanistan and the case points to the return of both judicial extremists and the continuing power of the warlords.
According to The Independent, Sayed Pervez Kambaksh received his sentence, issued by an Islamic court, as punishment for having allegedly downloaded and distributed a report on the internet "which stated that Muslim fundamentalists who claimed the Koran justified the oppression of women had misrepresented the views of the prophet Mohamed."

I'm not sure there could be a case that better illustrated the fallacy of Bush's repeated claims that freedom, democracy, and equality are flourishing in Afghanistan.

Siun has more details of the case at the link, as well as action items and contact information to plead for Kambaksh's life and freedom.

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime

Voyagers!

Open Wide...