Please Sir, I Want Some War

Norman Podhoretz says the intelligence community is trying to screw over the president and his plans for war with Iran.

I entertain an even darker suspicion. It is that the intelligence community, which has for some years now been leaking material calculated to undermine George W. Bush, is doing it again. This time the purpose is to head off the possibility that the President may order air strikes on the Iranian nuclear installations. As the intelligence community must know, if he were to do so, it would be as a last resort, only after it had become undeniable that neither negotiations nor sanctions could prevent Iran from getting the bomb, and only after being convinced that it was very close to succeeding. How better, then, to stop Bush in his tracks than by telling him and the world that such pressures have already been effective and that keeping them up could well bring about “a halt to Iran’s entire nuclear weapons program”—especially if the negotiations and sanctions were combined with a goodly dose of appeasement or, in the NIE’s own euphemistic formulation, “with opportunities for Iran to achieve its security, prestige, and goals for regional influence in other ways.”
They promised me a war, dammit, and I'm going to have it no matter what!

FYI, Mr. Podhoretz is Rudy Giuliani's Mideast Advisor.

HT to TPM.

Open Wide...

A-CHOO!

I've been having the craziest sneezing fit evah for the last half hour. This happens every once in awhile; I get it from Papa Shakes, who also has random, inexplicable sneezing fits.

It's kind of hilarious and kind of annoying. Not as bad as hiccups.

Open Wide...

The Writers Strike's Untold Toll



Genius.

[Not that we'd expect anything less from Colbert Report writers Frank Lesser and Rob Dubbin.]

Open Wide...

"Tin Foil Hats and Tin-Plated Lies"

A must-read two-part series by Mannion. Part one is here. Part two is here.

And I'm taking partial credit for part two* since I hounded and harassed and harangued him to post it, and withheld linkage until it was up. Because that's the kind of awesome motivator I am to my friends.

---------------------

* Not really.

Open Wide...

The Dog Ate My Intelligence Report

The new NIE report on Iran has placed President McFumblenutz, and his esteemed crew, into quite a pinch. Stephen Hadley made matters worse the other day by stating rather clearly that the NIE findings were given to Bush "a few months ago." For anyone keeping track, this means Bush was already informed about the cease in Iran's nuclear weapons program while he was claiming that World War III is right around the corner.

So now, President Sammy Stammerson tries his darndest to convince everyone in this morning's presser that he has an excuse for everything.

BUSH: I was made aware of the NIE last week. In August, I think it was John — Mike McConnell came in and said, We have some new information. He didn’t tell me what the information was. He did tell me it was going to take a while to analyze.
Sorry, but I'm not buying what he's selling. McConnell comes to him with a movie trailer teaser about the intelligence and leaves it at that? Sure sounds like a nice crock to me; too bad Thanksgiving is over. But wait, there's more:
REPORTER: Are you saying at no point while the rhetoric was escalating, as World War III was making it into conversation — at no point, nobody from your intelligence team or your administration was saying, Maybe you want to back it down a little bit?

BUSH: No — I’ve never — nobody ever told me that.
Survey says? ZERO.
MR. HADLEY: Two things. One, when the President was told that we had some additional information, he was basically told: stand down; needs to be evaluated; we'll come to you and tell you what we think it means. So this was basically -- as we said, this is information that came in the last few months, and the intelligence community spent a lot time to get on top of it.
It seems that people have some kind of problem calling Bush on this extreme level of bullshit due to HUTA Syndrome (head up the ass). Well, allow me to be the one to try and help everyone out with this golden rule: When two people present conflicting recollections of the same event, one of them is lying.

And special thanks to Liss for working on the awesome graphic. He may have eaten the intelligence report, but he's still such a good boy!!

Open Wide...

Shaker Gourmet: Peanut Brittle

Our recipe this week comes from Shaker Steve of Linkmeister, who notes that this makes a great stocking stuffer.

Peanut Brittle

In a large microwaveable bowl combine:

1 ½ cup sugar
¾ cup white corn syrup

--Microwave at High for 4 minutes.

--Add a 12 oz. can of cocktail peanuts to the mix (may substitute dry roasted peanuts, cashews, pecans, almonds. Hell, shell pistachios if you want to.) Stir well. Microwave at High 3 to 5 minutes, until light brown.

Add 1 ½ teaspoon butter
Add 1 ½ teaspoon vanilla extract
Blend well

--Microwave at High 1 to 2 minutes. Peanuts will be lightly browned and syrup very hot.

Add 1 ½ teaspoon baking soda

--Stir gently until light and foamy.

--Spread mixture onto lightly greased cookie sheet, or ungreased non-stick cookie sheet. Let cool ½ hour to 1 hour. Break into small pieces and store in airtight container.

This makes about 1 to 1 ½ pounds.

**Microwave power varies with make and model. You may need to adjust times accordingly.**
Steve credits GE's The Microwave Guide and Cookbook for the recipe.

If you'd like to be a part of Shaker Gourmet, email me at: shakergourmet (at) gmail.com

Open Wide...

Science is Still Fun!


And what's your science project, Sally?

Well, first I put this colored liquid on my fingernails and let it harden, and then I put this, like, totally sciencey elixir on it, and a supercool chemical reaction happens, and then—zow!—my fingernails are clear again.

So…your science project is nail polish remover?

Uh-huh. I learned all about it with my Discovery Channel Store Nail Art Kit for girls!

------------------------

Almost exactly one year ago to the day, I wrote about the Discovery Channel Store's curious gender segregation—and, this morning, I got an email from Shaker Mariah complaining of the same thing. In other words, another year passes, and it's still Same Shit, Different Day.

Last year:

Compare the first five items offered for boys:

~ Discovery Whodunit? Forensics Lab
~ Discovery Fingerprint Lab
~ Discovery Speed Detector
~ Radio Control Equalizer Stunt Car
~ Discovery Remote Control Chromashift Roboreptile

…to the first five items offered for girls:

~ Discovery Ultimate Pottery Wheel
~ Discovery Knit Kit
~ Discovery Deluxe Nail Salon
~ It's My Life Scrapbook Kit
~ Discovery Friendship Bracelets
This year:

The first five items offered for boys ages 8-12 are:

~ Cube Word Series 2 Set ("Create your very own interactive world")
~ Discovery ATM Machine ("This at-home ATM is an excellent way to learn about saving money.")
~ Discovery Radio Controlled Arthropods
~ Virtual Distance Football
~ Discovery Star Theater

The first five items offered for girls ages 8-12 are:

~ Rainbow In My Room
~ Discovery Sew Fun Sewing Machine
~ Discovery Pink Slide and Text Messengers ("Chat with your friends wirelessly and transmit text messages up to 15' away.")
~ Discovery Diamond Dust Microscope
~ Discovery Fashion Design Studio

What a "Fashion Design Studio" has to do with science is something I cannot explain to you.


To give you an idea of just how profound the disparity is, let's compare the "girls' microscope" to the "boys' microscope."

Girls: Discovery Diamond Dust Microscope



Boys: Discovery Macro Microscope


Aside from the fact that the name of the girls' microscope suggests that girls will only want to look at jewels and fairy dust, and the fact that it's pink, could it come with comparatively less shit? The Discovery Diamond Dust Microscope comes with, according to the product description, a "real diamond dust and salt crystal comparative slide" and "3 blank slides, cover and labels." The Discovery Macro Microscope, on the other hand, comes with:

~ Five vials of remarkable specimens to examine
~ Five prepared slides: two insect cross sections, two plant cross-sections and one slide with a real 900-year old, Peruvian mummy wrap!
~ Tweezers
~ Eye-dropper
~ Measuring beaker
~ Spoon
~ Blank slides for collecting your own specimens
~ Experiment booklet

Interestingly, the Discovery Macro Microscope is made available in the girls' section, too—but the Discovery Diamond Dust Microscope is not made available in the boys' section.

And though the girls' section is three pages shorter than the boys', there's still room for not just one, not just two, but three jewelry-maker kits!

Klutz ® Shrink Art Jewelry Kit



Discovery Jewelry Design Kit



Discovery Optical Art Jewelry Kit


As I said last year, it's those items that don't make the crossover between the girls' and boys' sections at all which are actually most telling about the disparity. The separation might not seem to make much sense—until, that is, you consider how patently absurd it would be to offer a toy nail salon as an "educational toy" in a non-gendered context.

Only viewed through the prism of sex-segregation does all of the other completely unrelated-to-science crap being marketed to the girls—the heart-shaped Discovery Memory Keeper Digital Photo Pendant, the Discovery Headband Creations Kit, the Klutz ® Paper Fashions Kit, the Klutz ® Knitting Kit—seem passably "educational" to the uncritical eye. As expected, the stuff exclusive to the boys' section—even the non-science stuff, especially the active toys, like scooters—are things that shouldn't be considered sex-specific, but are, simply to offset the surfeit of pink rubbish being hawked to girls under the pretense of science.



The girls of Central High show off their love of science.


Open Wide...

Then Came the Dinosaurs...

The Texas Education Agency has fired its top science advisor because she promotes evolution.

After 27 years as a science teacher and 9 years as the Texas Education Agency’s director of science, Christine Castillo Comer said she did not think she had to remain “neutral” about teaching the theory of evolution.

But now Ms. Comer, 56, of Austin, is out of a job, after forwarding an e-mail message on a talk about evolution and creationism — “a subject on which the agency must remain neutral,” according to a dismissal letter last month that accused her of various instances of “misconduct and insubordination” and of siding against creationism and the doctrine that life is the product of “intelligent design.”


[...]

Ms. Comer said that barely an hour after forwarding the e-mail message about Dr. Forrest’s talk, she was called in and informed that Lizzette Reynolds, deputy commissioner for statewide policy and programs, had seen a copy and complained, calling it “an offense that calls for termination.” Ms. Comer said she had no idea how Ms. Reynolds, a former federal education official who served as an adviser to George W. Bush when he was governor of Texas, had seen the message so quickly, and remembered thinking, “What is this, the thought police or what?”

Under pressure, Ms. Comer said, she sent out a retraction, advising recipients to disregard the message.

But Ms. Comer, the divorced mother of a grown son and daughter and the supporter of an ailing father, was still forced out of the $60,000-a-year job, she said, submitting her resignation on Nov. 7. She and the agency said nothing about her departure until The Austin American-Statesman obtained a copy of the “proposed disciplinary action” and her resignation letter.


The only dinosaur that lived in Texas.


Cross-posted from Bark Bark Woof Woof.

Open Wide...

Promise Breaker

I wanted to share this amazing piece of short fiction with everyone. I can't really tell you what it's about without ruining it. You just have to read it and see for yourself.

When you're done, I have just one question: Have you kept your promise?


[Hat tip to my pal Lena.]

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

What movie line do you quote most often?

Indirectly, I quote Sailor Ripley's (Nic Cage) infamous line from Wild at Heart the most often by far. The line is: "Did I ever tell you that this here jacket is a symbol of my individuality and my belief in personal freedom?" I substitute all sorts of shit for "jacket." Mostly clothing items, but sometimes completely random rubbish. Like, instead of saying, "This sandwich is tasty," I'll say to Mr. Shakes, "Did I ever tell you that this here sandwich is a symbol of my individuality and my belief in personal freedom?" At which point, he'll quote Lula Fortune (Laura Dern): "About fifty thousand times."

Directly, the line I use the most often is from Peter Jackson's '92 film Dead or Alive (aka Braindead). Matilda goes apeshit at the sound of ringing phones, whistling, sirens, digitalized voices, mewing cats on YouTube, and other strange noises—and, upon hearing them, she races to me and runs around my feet in circles, biting me repeatedly and making a collection of hilarious clicking, chirping, and whining sounds. Whenever she does this, I grab her and quote Vera "Mum" Cosgrove's (Elizabeth Moody) exclamation when she's bitten by the Sumatran rat-monkey: "Look at it! It bit me! I've been savaged!"

Another one I use a lot is from Hannah and Her Sisters, said by Frederick (Max von Sydow): "If Jesus came back and saw what's going on in his name, he'd never stop throwing up."

Open Wide...

Media Suckitude, Part 1,547,923

1. Jianguo Liu, a researcher who holds the Rachel Carson chair in ecological sustainability at Michigan State University, leads a study into divorce and ecological footprints.

2. The study concludes that households "in which a divorce occurs have a greater negative impact on the environment in terms of efficient use of resources than the households of married couples," i.e. two people in two homes use more energy than two people in one home. Duh.

3. Liu says he hopes couples "will think about the decision. Also, they can inform other people about the environmental impact of divorce." This could be construed as a covert recommendation against divorce, or it could be interpreted as a simple recommendation to treat your ecological footprint as something else to consider during a divorce.

4. Story is written with no clarification of Liu's statements.

5. Story is nonetheless headlined: "Want to Go 'Green'? Stay Married" and subtitled: "Divorced Households Have Negative Impact on Environment, Study Finds."

6. Story also includes no suggestion that an alternative to staying married and martyring oneself for the environment is getting divorced and living in smaller quarters appropriate for single people.

7. Story makes no comment whatsoever about the fact that many Americans already live in resource-guzzling homes—and that two partnered people living in a 5,000-square-foot house by themselves just because they can is more ecologically unfriendly than two separated people living in two small, energy-efficient apartments. Story also makes no comment about whether study controls for wanton consumerism.

8. Story is thusly pointless dreck. Possibly study is pointless dreck.

9. Countless people will read this story and think: "Divorcees are ruining the environment." Some of these people will live by themselves in homes built to accommodate entire families.

Open Wide...

The 699 Club

My BFF Pat Robertson is retiring as CEO of the Christian Broadcasting Network to make way for his son, Gordon.


Pat Robertson, 77, founded the network in 1960 and grew it into a national powerhouse, with cable and broadcast outlets across the country. He'll stay on as chairman.

"I thought that some of this day-to-day operation was important to pass down the line, especially to somebody a little more adept at figuring out the new technologies coming at such a bewildering speed to all of us," Pat Robertson said in his announcement on The 700 Club, which Gordon Robertson produces.
I look forward to future press releases detailing how fags and feminists are responsible for his failure to secure a 10:30 tee time at Pebble Beach. Video of old Patty screaming at Satan to get off his porch is probably too much for which to hope.

I hope he'll continue his Robust Living into retirement, maybe put together a tour of exhibition appearances in which he demonstrates his world-record shattering leg-presses.

Open Wide...

To Be Gay in Newark...

New Jersey used to be the butt of jokes ("You're from Jersey? What exit?"), but in the last few years it has become a leader in gay equality; one of the three states that allow civil unions and some of the strongest anti-discrimination laws on the books. It even had a gay governor, although his outing wasn't exactly a Gay Pride moment.

Unfortunately, one of the places that got left behind is Newark. It has never fully recovered from the race riots of the 1960's and it still gets a lot of bad press for its reputation as a gritty industrial slum, a sharp contrast to the rest of the state and the bright lights of New York across the Hudson. And if you're gay, Newark is a war zone.

To live in Newark often means grappling with unrelenting poverty, the anesthetizing lure of drugs, murderous gangs, a lack of decent jobs.

But for gay men, lesbians and transgender people, there are additional obstacles that are seldom acknowledged: gay bashings, H.I.V., open hostility from many religious leaders and sometimes callous treatment by the police.

When venturing outside his Central Ward neighborhood, Tyrone Simpson, 19, stays on main thoroughfares and steers clear of the men in gang colors looking for easy quarry. Dynasty Mitchell, 21, an aspiring poet who works at a supermarket, has learned to blend in by stretching a do-rag over his head and adopting a thuggish gait in public.

“If you’re not prepared to fight, you’re not going to survive in Newark,” said Mr. Simpson, who is unabashedly gay.

New Jersey has become a national beacon for gay equality. It boasts some of the toughest anti-discrimination laws in the country, and recent legislation makes it one of only three states that recognize same-sex civil unions. Gay marriage, some say, is just around the corner. Across the state, same-sex couples and their children have become integrated into suburban life.

But here in the state’s largest city, gay men and lesbians might as well live on another planet.

“You wouldn’t know that Greenwich Village is 10 miles away,” said James Credle, 62, a Vietnam veteran who is working with about a dozen other activists to revive the Newark Pride Alliance, a group established three years ago after a 15-year-old lesbian, Sakia Gunn, was stabbed to death by a man who, the police said, was infuriated that she had rejected his advances. “People here feel like we don’t deserve to be alive.For us, it’s about survival,” Mr. Credle said, “and all this talk of gay marriage is just a luxury.”

The city has no gay community center, no gay pride parade, no established gay organizations; there are no bars devoted exclusively to gay or lesbian clientele. “Newark is like one big closet,” said Ron Saleh, a consultant to the John Edwards presidential campaign, who moved here two years ago. “And there’s nothing going on for gay people. It’s like a desert.”

[...]

In some ways, the lack of a vibrant, organized gay community mirrors many other aspects of civic life in Newark, a city stunted by poverty and lacking the kind of comfortable middle class found in cities of similar size.

“We are an underdeveloped community in every area, so it is no surprise” that homophobia persists, said Ms. Rone.

[...]

For now, the only refuge for gay people is in a nondescript building on the outskirts of downtown. Project Wow, as it is called, is a no-frills drop-in center run by the North Jersey Community Research Initiative, an organization that devotes most of its resources to research on AIDS drugs and free medical care. Project Wow draws a few dozen young people each night who come for counseling and H.I.V. prevention advice but mostly for the camaraderie and shelter from the city’s unsympathetic streets.

Alex Williams, Project Wow’s director, asked that the center’s location not be printed, noting that 15 of the center’s employees and clients had been attacked on their way to or from the building in the last six months.
I'm no sociologist, but it seems that when poverty and a lousy economy are part of the picture, people turn on the easiest target they can find...which is usually a group against whom overt prejudice and discrimination is acceptable and against whom violence is tolerated by law enforcement.

(H/T to Shaker Betsy)

Open Wide...

FYI


[FYI 1; FYI 2; FYI 3. Hint: They're better if you click 'em!]

Open Wide...

Do-Gooder


Brad Pitt speaks at a news conference announcing plans for 150 affordable, environmentally friendly homes in the Lower Ninth Ward of New Orleans December 3, 2007. REUTERS/Lee Celano (UNITED STATES)

Go see Scout Prime to read about Brad Pitt's little pink houses, toward which the Jolie-Pitt household has donated $5 million.

Open Wide...

Quote of the Day

"Joke Line, you are pwned."Nicole Belle, on Senator Russ Feingold's response to Joe Klein's recent journamalistic shenanigans.

Open Wide...

Never Mind

From the New York Times:

A new assessment by American intelligence agencies concludes that Iran halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003 and that the program remains on hold, contradicting an assessment two years ago that Tehran was working inexorably toward building a bomb.
It's a good thing we didn't bomb them, then. That would have been embarrassing.

Open Wide...

Caption This Photo



"It's all right, pal. You can ride the firetruck, too."

[Via Jezebel.]

Open Wide...

And I've Never Masturbated, Either

Remember the Young Republican leader who set off the collective Shakesville gaydar like it was a stupid detector in George Bush's general vicinity?

Well, he says he's not gay.

Uh huh. And I'm not a fat bitch.

Open Wide...

He's Still Not Gay

Following up on Melissa's post...

The Idaho Statesman has more on Sen. Larry Craig's not-gay exploits. This time four men have come forward to claim that they've had sex with the senator. There are audio clips attached to the story. Warning: they are explicit and probably not work-safe.

As with the Statesman's August report, the new evidence is not definitive. There are no videos, no love letters, no voice messages. Like last August, they are he-said, he-said allegations about a man seeking discreet sex from partners whom he counted on to never tell.

But the Statesman's investigation, which included reviews of travel and property records and background checks on all five men, found nothing to disprove the five new accounts. The men offer telling and sometimes similar details about what happened, or the senator's travel records place him in the city where sex is alleged to have occurred, or his accusers told credible witnesses at the time of the incident.
Obviously what this story needs is some hard-core evidence that the hook-ups actually happened.

Let me re-phrase that.

What is needed is corroboration of the men's stories from other sources, and more than just an attempt to prove the negative.

Senator Craig is still denying all of it, but there's an element to the story that tends to lend credibility to the events described. It's called "gaydar."
Russell, 48, a Nampa native who lives in Utah, was among three men who contacted the Statesman about what they described as unusually attentive behavior on Craig's part. Russell was willing to be named for this story and spoke in a tape-recorded interview.

Russell worked as a food service manager at Bogus Basin ski resort and said his encounter probably occurred in the 1983-84 ski season, soon after Craig had married following the 1982 page scandal. Russell had taken a food class from Suzanne Craig and had heard the rumors that Craig was gay.

Russell, openly gay at the time, said he set out to engage Craig "and attempted to show a personal interest - not in a suggestive way - but a personal interest to see if he would respond."

"I recall that he was very delighted to talk to me - smiling, happy, very delighted - and that he had suggested that we could get together sometime," he said. "Why would he have a personal interest in meeting me elsewhere?"

Russell said he became convinced Craig was gay because he used subtle signals consistent with communication between gay men in public places.

"You've heard the term, 'gaydar'? OK, it's there. You know it. You know when somebody is raising an eyebrow at you because it's their gesture when they say 'hello' or when they are subtly trying to send you a message that they recognize you as being a gay person."

Nothing came of the meeting, Russell said. But he came forward now because he is offended by Craig's denials.

"I'm disgusted because it's hypocritical, and he's lying. He's lying through his teeth. Heterosexual men do not behave like that."
I don't have a problem if Larry Craig wants to hit on men and pretend that he's still straight; it's hypocritical, but then, he's a right-wing Republican and that goes with the territory. What I don't like is that it's not doing the gay community any favors by giving the rest of us a black eye for reinforcing the stereotype that all gay men live this way, and I also think he's not doing his family any favors by lying to them. When the truth comes out -- and it inevitably will -- and he has to admit the truth -- which is more problematic -- he may lose the trust of his fellow citizens and senators, but he will still have to go home to the people he hurt the most, and that's nothing but pure selfishness to put his fears and prejudices above everything else.

Cross-posted from Bark Bark Woof Woof.

Open Wide...