Thanksgiving Giggle: Turn your turkey into a woman's body before carving it up!

Shaker Heather just emailed me the following: "So, I wanted to forward this to you. My aunt just forwarded it to me. What a horrific way to start a Monday morning. I can very much see something like this being done to the turkey on Thanksgiving Day in my neck of the woods, and everyone laughing in a haha, look, the turkey is wearing a bikini, isn't that cute sort of way. But I think I would have to vomit on the turkey..."

NEW TURKEY RECIPE
Your dinner will be the talk of the TOWN!!


You should try this!
Sure to bring smiles from your guests!
Here is a new way to prepare your Thanksgiving Turkey.

1. Cut out aluminum foil in desired shapes.
2. Arrange the turkey in the roasting pan, position the foil carefully. (see attached picture for details)
3. Roast according to your own recipe and serve.
4. Watch your guests' faces...



If mine were one of the "guests' faces" looking at that revolting thing at Thanksgiving dinner, it would not be smiling, I can assure you. Although it would make for the requesting of pieces rather interesting as I politely asked for "the disembodied cunt, please" before leaving the room, the house, and possibly the planet.

In case this wasn't enough vile swill for you, the email ends with this charming little bit of rhyming fat hatred:

May your stuffing be tasty; May your turkey plump.
May your potatoes and gravy have never a lump.
May your yams be delicious and your pies take the prize,
And may your Thanksgiving dinner stay off your thighs!

Yeah—'cuz if you're fat, no one will ever make a turkey that looks like you to carve apart in a ritualistic holiday feast! Or something.

Sigh.

Open Wide...

Sexual Harassment Rampant in Chapel Hill Halloween Celebration; It's the Ladies' Fault for Being Dirty Sluts!

by Shaker Elmo

Every year on Halloween, tens of thousands of (mostly) young people gather on the main drag in Chapel Hill, to walk up and down the block to show off their costumes. Most of the crowd consists of students from UNC–Chapel Hill and other nearby universities. It is a fun event to watch from the sidelines. When I was an undergraduate, I enjoyed sitting on the stone walls along Franklin Street, watching the elaborate costumes go by.

When I returned a couple of years later as a participant, things were different. As I walked down the street, dressed in plain, winter clothes (amazingly enough it's usually chilly in NC on Halloween), my butt was grabbed, guys yelled lewd things at me, and I was groped (in other ways) numerous times. My friends experienced the same things and were disgusted by the end of the night. We left feeling like crap. My male friends did not participate in such disgusting behavior, of course (not every guy who attends Halloween engages in this crappy behavior), but having not received such harassment, they said they had a good time. Their experience was completely different.

One year I attended the event, a guy was dressed as a large, ~8 to 10 foot tall penis. His friends were around him, spraying silly spray over the top of the penis into the crowd. And that's what the "celebration" itself felt like—a group of people sexually assaulting the crowd at random.

That was years ago. I have since returned to the school as a graduate student. This year, the editorial board of the UNC student newspaper warned female students that if they did not want to be "haggled" while walking down Franklin Street, they'd better look as sexually unattractive as possible or make their bodies inaccessible.

Speaking specifically to "girls" who attend:

We advise all partygoers to travel in groups - strength in numbers, after all - and avoid dimly lit areas on Halloween.

It's no secret that many college women use Halloween as an excuse to wear extremely revealing clothing. The tendency to bare all is perhaps a large factor in drawing such massive crowds of men to Franklin Street.

But while students often expect the memory of their charade to last no longer than their buzz, they should be aware that images of them in costumes that would make their parents proud can be permanently documented by people's cameras.

As such, we recommend dressing up as an Eskimo, polar bear or Peter Griffin from Family Guy to avoid getting haggled.
The editors state that having your picture taken in a skimpy outfit is the only danger of wearing such a costume on Halloween; however, they insinuate that it could be worse and warn students to walk in numbers, etc. Why not address the harassment specifically? One student thought that the editorial board should have focused on criticizing bad male behavior rather than skimpy costumes, and she wrote a letter to the editor the next day:

Wednesday's editorial "You better watch out," (Oct. 31) advised females to dress as, "an Eskimo, polar bear or Peter Griffin from Family Guy to avoid getting haggled." That is outright ridiculous.
She notes earlier in her letter "Despite having practiced 'safety in numbers,' I still had my ass grabbed no less than three times—twice under my skirt." She continues to criticize the editorial:

While I recognize revealing clothing might send an unintended message, it still doesn't say, "please touch me."

It doesn't even say, "please talk to me."

Maybe rather than encouraging women to dress more appropriately on a night noted for its wild lack of propriety, [the editorial board] should be encouraging men to restrain themselves and realize that it is not their right to "haggle" a woman - regardless of the way she is dressed.

I usually question a costume idea for its coolness and originality. It's sad that I'm now expected to question whether my idea will risk creeps trying to assault me.
Amen. Harassment of women needed to be addressed. There is nothing wrong with the Daily Tarheel editors warning women of the dangers of going to Franklin Street on Halloween—staying in numbers and not traveling down dark alleyways by yourself is decent advice for everyone, regardless of one's sex. It's very unfortunate that we have to feel as though you can't do these things, but if checking your surroundings, as they advise, is something you can do to keep yourself safe, by all means do it. But, again, they did not address the behavior of the men on Franklin Street. And that's the problem. The are very slyly taking a 'blame the victim' stance.

Back to the letter to the editor written by the UNC senior: The responses to her letter were frightening. As a female who is constantly facing sexism on campus, and who was sexually assaulted by a group that kidnapped me from Franklin Street, the comments put me on edge. It's one thing to read rape-apologist type comments on a blog on the web, but in your student newspaper, when you know that most of the comments in the Daily Tarheel come from UNC students, staff, and faculty, it's a bit more disturbing. Here are some comments:

(First comment she received)
Adam
posted 11/01/07 @ 8:34 AM EST

Im not condoning men grabbing women on halloween, but dont wear the uniform if you cant play the game. If I were to dress up as something really offensive such as someone who died in 9/11, I would expect to be yelled at or punched. It's all about blowback.


l
posted 11/01/07 @ 8:39 AM EST

If you want to be respected, wouldn't it make sense to dress like it? What do you think the "unintended" message is when you wear sleazy clothing, on Halloween or otherwise? If you're participating in an event known for its "wild lack of propriety", and dress as if you don't have any, what do you expect to happen?


sad for you
posted 11/01/07 @ 9:43 AM EST

wow honey.

"safety in numbers": it's franklin street on halloween. you could be alone or in a group of 50, there's no getting people off of you.

"revealing clothing might send an UNINTENDED message": what message did you intend to send when you went out half-naked? were you not screaming for sexual attention?

"i usually question a costume idea for coolness and ORIGINALITY": is that why you went dressed as britney spears' catholic school girl? britney wasn't even being original when she did it.

you should have gone as miss south carolina. this is just the kind of speech she'd make.


Brad Green
posted 11/01/07 @ 10:16 AM EST

Moreover, most of the people on Franklin are drunk...as bad as that is, when you become intoxicated you lose any inhibitions you may or may not have had while sober. You cant expect to wear a revealing outfit, walk out on Franklin St on Halloween, and not get some attention. I had a girl come onto me last night when I was wearing a full surgeons outfit with bloody hands. People just do stuff like this when they are drunk. For what its worth, your outfit might not make a big difference, since everyone is drunk.


(this one really pissed me off)
w00tcakes
posted 11/01/07 @ 11:33 AM EST

Are you seriously asking for respect when you dress like a whore?

Please tell me you don't see the blatant, juicy irony here.

If you want respect, THEN WARRANT RESPECT. If you're dressed as a slut then OF COURSE you're going to be harrassed. Good Lord, you go to Chapel Hill. Figure it out!

No I don't condone sexual harrassment or any of that, blah blah blah blah. No, alcohol is not an excuse blah blah blah, but seriously, women WAKE UP. You're in a situation where you're showing your stuff quite freely, people are drunk and have gloriously-deluded inhibitions. Guys are idiots, yes, but, come on... did you really expect anything different when you're walking around baring all?

If you want to dress aroudn like a prostitute, then expect some sort of backlash!
The last commenter threw in some fat phobia:

EC
posted 11/02/07 @ 9:21 AM EST

Ok, then how about don't dress like an American slut. Make sure you're skirt is at least half-way down the thigh, and don't wear a shirt that could fit a two-year-old baby. Most women are too overweight to pull it off anyway... I've seen some girls around campus and cellulose thighs are NOT appealing and I don't know why they think people want to see them.
There were many more crappy comments—too many to post here—though many of the comments are good, with people saying 'no, this behavior is never justified.'

If things at UNC–Chapel Hill did not seem bad enough …

Today, a student wrote in to say that her ass was grabbed as she walked toward Franklin Street on Halloween. She repeated, unfortunately, the belief that she should be expecting such behavior for dressing like as "Supermanned ho." What happened next is horrifying:

The gross dude says, "Hey Baby! How old are you?"

I lie, "17, lay off me" (I'm 20).

Next thing I know there's a badge and a Breathalyzer in my face. Upon my refusal to be tested, his Alcohol Law Enforcement cohort shoved me against their car, handcuffed me, brought me to court, and I spent a night in jail.

Keep in mind I had absolutely no alcohol on my person, was not drunk and was not stumbling or dancing in the middle of the street swirling my shirt around my head. I was simply walking down a street in my neighborhood with my friends.
So, a plain-clothes (I'm assuming) law enforcement officer, patrolling a neighborhood near Franklin Street, grabbed a student's butt and came onto her to see if she had been drinking and underage. WTF??? She essentially says that he had no reason to suspect that she was drunk and even if he had, why on earth would it be acceptable to violate her then come on to her??? Her letter continues:

However, do your job with some dignity. Do not lead young women through sketchy dark alleys. Do not physically molest them. Do not sexually harass underage drinkers.

I have heard several disturbing accounts such as this one. I am not the first, and I will not be the last.

We (or someone) gave this group power, and this gift is being abused. They must be stopped.
Indeed. Something needs to be done. And I don't mean pulling the plug on the event necessarily; I mean guys need to be told that this is unacceptable! Plain and simple. It is never okay to touch a woman unless she explicitly tells you it's okay. There is no ambiguity here and there is no excuse for such behavior. Period. Some of the guys feel as though there are no rules on Halloween and they have a sort of "get out of jail free" card excusing their poor behavior. And UNC and Chapel Hill authorities need to address this issue. It's a public street near campus where this is happening. They need to do something now.

Open Wide...

Don't Forget Your Daily Vote!

The 2007 Weblog Awards

We're getting our asses kicked, Shakers! Surely we can do better!

While you're there, don't forget our contributor Jon Swift is up for Funniest Blog.

And if I can make a couple of other recommendations...don't let Lindsay Beyerstein (aka Majikthise) lose Best Individual Blogger to Glenn "InstaPundit" Reynolds! And Pam could use some love, too, as could PZ here, BitchPhD here, The Carpetbagger Report or Feministe here, Driftglass here, and Shakesville institution Konagod here.

Also, Shaker Kathleen's blog, Diary of a Heretic, was nominated for Best Literature Blog, and she notes via email that she's "up against big names with editorial staffs and even marketing departments as well as huge fan clubs," so help a girl out!

If I missed any other Shakers, let me know in comments.

UPDATE: I forgot a biggie—don't let Crooks and Liars lose to Hot Air in the Best Video Blog category!

Also: Arkades mentions in comments that, even though Echidne is currently leading here, "a Shaker bump could help make sure she stays in the lead!" Of course, she's in a brutal category, given that our good friends The Newshoggers are in that category, along with the brilliant Obsidian Wings and Slacktivist, too. Oy!

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime

Lippy the Lion and Hardy Har Har

Open Wide...

News from Shakes Manor

Every. single. time. this commercial comes on the telly at Shakes Manor, Mr. Shakes and I collapse into one giant heap of hysterical giggles:


While we were watching the first episode of the new season of The Amazing Race tonight (Go Goths! Woot!), that advert came on like three commercial breaks in a row. By the third time, we were absolutely crying with laughter. I fell over onto Mr. Shakes weakly, and said, "I can't believe we still howl like monkeys each time we see that thing." Mr. Shakes replied, "Why noot? It's fooking brilliant!"

Open Wide...

Moral Values, Bitchez!

I would do another Mad Lib, but I'm not on my usual computer...

Anyway, unfortunately, another member of the Moral Majority has proved himself to be an upstanding citizen and good Christian after being charged with three counts of using a child in sexual performance and one count of unlawful sexual activity for having allegedly sexually assaulted three boys he mentored at First Baptist Church at the Mall in Lakeland, FL:

[Marshal Seymour, a 40-year-old student ministry volunteer] met his victims through the church and paid them to perform sex acts or to keep quiet about sexual encounters, Lakeland police said. The boys were 15, 16 and 17 at the time of the incidents, which occurred during the past two years, according to arrest documents.

...[Jay Dennis], the church's senior pastor, read a statement Saturday afternoon in which he expressed sorrow for the victims and their families, as well as for Seymour's family and friends. Seymour is married with a young child.
Dennis commented: "This is a pastor's worst nightmare." Yeah, I bet it was no picnic for the boys Seymour victimized, either.

Of course, it was a preventable nightmare, but Seymour was allowed to mentor students despite having done the same thing before at another church in Alabama, after First Baptist's background check failed to turn up the one year suspended sentence. Naturally, this has sent church leaders into damage control.

"There will be a new normal for us," Dennis said. "The church has also been harmed by this situation. This is a Category 5 storm for us. Our church is a great church, but today we mourn the fact that innocent people have been profoundly wounded."
Yes, of course. The comments about how the church was harmed by its own incompetence and reminders about what a great church it really is will come later, after the mourning. Ahem.

[H/T Steven Reynolds.]

Open Wide...

Happy Birthday...

...to Maurinsky, who was, quite literally, the second regular Shaker that wasn't related to me!

...and to Linkmeister, whose blog is one of my longest-running daily reads!

Open Wide...

Fred Thompson and the Drug Dealer

GOP presidential candidate Fred Thompson has been able to overcome charges that he lobbied for pro-choice advocacy groups and gave legal advice to lawyers who were defending the Pan Am 103 terrorists, but now he's got an adviser and donor to his campaign who is a convicted drug dealer.

Republican presidential candidate Fred D. Thompson has been crisscrossing the country since early this summer on a private jet lent to him by a businessman and close adviser who has a criminal record for drug dealing.

Thompson selected the businessman, Philip Martin, to raise seed money for his White House bid. Martin is one of four campaign co-chairmen and the head of a group called the "first day founders." Campaign aides jokingly began to refer to Martin, who has been friends with Thompson since the early 1990s, as the head of "Thompson's Airforce."

Thompson's frequent flights aboard Martin's twin-engine Cessna 560 Citation have saved him more than $100,000, because until the law changed in September, campaign-finance rules allowed presidential candidates to reimburse private jet owners for just a fraction of the true cost of flights.

Martin entered a plea of guilty to the sale of 11 pounds of marijuana in 1979; the court withheld judgment pending completion of his probation. He was charged in 1983 with violating his probation and with multiple counts of felony bookmaking, cocaine trafficking and conspiracy. He pleaded no contest to the cocaine-trafficking and conspiracy charges, which stemmed from a plan to sell $30,000 worth of the drug, and was continued on probation.

Thompson's campaign said the candidate was not aware of the multiple criminal cases, for which Martin served no jail time. All are described in public court records.

Karen Hanretty, Thompson's deputy communications director, said yesterday that "Senator Thompson was unaware of the information until this afternoon. Phil Martin has been a friend of the senator since the mid-1990s and remains so today." Thompson communications director Todd Harris added that Martin was not subjected to the campaign's standard vetting process because "he's a longtime friend."

"There's not a campaign in the world that has the ability to research every one of its supporters going back more than 20 years," Harris said.
If this happened to a Democrat -- and I'm not saying it couldn't -- that candidacy would be over. Not because the Democrats have higher standards for big-time donors and they do a perfect job of screening their friends -- one Norman Hsu comes to mind -- but because if the news got out that one of Hillary Clinton's or John Edwards's contributors and advisers had a rap sheet like Mr. Martin, the streets would be littered with the remains of the exploding heads of the Orcosphere. Bill O'Reilly would go absolutely batshit crazy, which would be an event in itself, seeing as how he does that every night anyway. But when it's one of their own, the righties do a great job of dismissing it as old news, nothing to see here, folks, move on...and for good measure, Bill Clinton killed his drug dealing connections at an airstrip in Arkansas. Didn't you see "The Clinton Chronicles"?

If anything, this may boost Thompson's flagging campaign, at least among the constituency of voters who identify with the bad guys from a Steven Segal movie...co-starring Fred Dalton Thompson.

Cross-posted from Bark Bark Woof Woof.

Open Wide...

Memories!

In light of the 2007 ZOMG Hillary's Playing the Gender Card Cuntravaganza, I thought it might be fun to take a stroll down memory lane to the beginning of this year, when Nancy Pelosi was sworn in as the first woman Speaker, and, amidst the corybantic squall of scandalized indignation that she would dare to surround herself with her family, the Cult of the Feminazi Cooter was born. Misty, watercolored memories...!

Quote of the Day, January 11, 2007: "No woman in the history of politics has used her womb like Nancy Pelosi." — Harvard Law School student and conservative misogynist douchebag Ben Shapiro, who obviously doesn't understand that use of the womb is an important part of generating the radical gay agenda that is shot out of feminazi cooters, so of course she has to use her womb a lot. Duh.

I'm sort of breaking the Feminazi Cooter League's code of secrecy to do this, but let me just illustrate how the process works, to clear up any confusion:


The Radical Gay Eggs are kept in the ovaries until they are fertilized by the dulcet tones of Barney Frank (or a Frank-certified Fertilofag like Spudsy), at which time they are deposited in the womb where they incubate alongside the Radical Gay Agenda Pink Disco Ball, which spins to the beat of It's Raining Men. In mere hours, the Radical Gay Eggs hatch into teensy lavender copies of Melissa Etheridge singles, which slowly disintegrate as they pass through the vaginal canal, emitting radiating vibrations of the Radical Gay Agenda.

It's really just that simple. But, yeah, it keeps the womb busy.

Open Wide...

Hillary's got a vagina! And COOTIES!

More on The Woman Card from:

Atrios: "All of this conversation just serves to reinforce the obvious state of things in this country: white males are the most aggressive practitioners of so-called 'identity politics' and always have been."

Matt Stoller: "This is a woman's election. People are tired of bullying, war, and marshal glory, and they want a different kind of power, one that isn't full of irresponsible certitude, sleazy salesmanship, and macho fakery that is the hallmark of the current boys club in DC."

And the amazing Digby:

[T]he entire Republican campaign strategy can be said to be one big gender card—the only people they believe matter in this country are delicate, insecure creatures who are so sensitive that they have to be pampered and pandered to like a bunch of overfed princes who like to play cowboy and don't want to share their favorite binky.

Every presidential candidate, and most other politicians, since 1980, have been bowing and scraping before this constituency. But for some reason, the hunting trips and codpieces and brush clearing and all that metaphorical crotch measuring isn't considered playing "the gender card." It's just considered the normal political pander to an aggrieved minority vote: the poor white males who've been treated terribly by all those powerful women and minorities and gays. What could be wrong with that?

...Half of this country is female and they've noticed, in case these manly men haven't, that presidential politics is a very exclusive a boys club and we don't find it all that odd to mention it. Certainly, if it's ok for politicians to literally walk around with a codpiece to show their masculine bona fides, I don't think it's out of line for a female candidate to speak to a younger generation of women at her college and take a little bit of pride in the institution and her own accomplishments—since she does happen to be the first serious female contender for president in the whole history of the country. Excuse me for thinking she has the damned right to do it.
Go read the whole thing and cheer.

Open Wide...

You Know You Want to Find Out...

...how to make your own life-sized Jabba the Hutt! [Via.]



"Don't give me no lip, J-Des T!"

Open Wide...

Quote of the Day


"Soviet Union?"—GOP Presidential Candidate Fred Thompson, responding to a question about whether he supports a federal law legalizing same-sex civil unions.

Open Wide...

Martial Law Declared in Pakistan

In expectation of losing a court decision that would allow him to stay in power, Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf declared emergency rule and suspended the constitution earlier today:

In an emergency session, the Supreme Court ruled the move unconstitutional. But Musharraf reportedly suspended the entire panel when the justices refused to sign new oaths. He was expected address the nation later and cite continuing fighting in the turbulent Swat Valley as his reason.

Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammed Chaudhry and the other judges remained in the courthouse Saturday evening as police blocked the road to the building. Chaudhry had been removed from the court by Muharraf earlier this year, but the court reinstated him in August.

"This is a very fateful day for the country. Pakistan is in deep, deep crisis," said Aitzaz Ahsan, Chaudhry's attorney. "It is one man against the nation." Ahsan said that he expected to be arrested later Saturday night.
The Bush administration has been trying to pressure Musharraf against instituting martial law amid increasing unrest, and, yesterday, in a last ditch effort, Condi Rice "sent a warning to Musharraf not to take authoritarian measures to hold on to power."

And her quote on the matter is just priceless: "I think it would be quite obvious that the United States would not be supportive of extra-constitutional means." Oh, my aching sides!

Who are these people that can continue to say such totally hypocritical horseshit without a trace of irony, as if they hadn't sold off the moral highground to strip mall developers years ago?

Open Wide...

The Virtual Pub Is Open



TFIF, Shakers!

Belly up to the bar
and name your poison!

Open Wide...

Damn Dems

Of course they did:

Sens. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) announced this afternoon that they will vote in favor of confirming Michael B. Mukasey as attorney general, effectively ending a growing revolt by fellow Democrats that had threatened Mukasey's confirmation.

By announcing their support, the two Democrats virtually guarantee that Mukasey, with support from the nine Republicans, will be narrowly approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday.
It now occurs to me that my immobilizing apathy about this whole nomination process was not just down to my firm belief that Bush would nominate a total douche, but was also the result of a deeply internalized resignation to the certainty of the Dems confirming whatever total douche our supposed-to-be-lame duck of a president offered for consideration.

Open Wide...

Arf!



Wah wah wah.

[Via Michael K. Background here.]

Open Wide...

As I Was Saying…

WaPo: Damsel in the Debate

AP: Hillary hides behind skirt?

Reuters: Obama accuses Clinton of hiding behind gender

Open Wide...

Cheney Impeachment Vote In Da House

Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) will force a vote on a Cheney impeachment resolution next week:

Kucinich said he plans to introduce a privileged resolution, which would have priority for a House floor vote, on Nov. 6. A vote on the measure would be required within two days.

Observers expect a motion to table Kucinich's resolution, which has 21 Democratic co-sponsors. It is almost certain that such a move to kill the resolution would be successful, but activists are urging members of Congress to support Kucinich's move.

Open Wide...

Caption This Photo



Stylin' and Profilin'

[Thanks to Mama Shakes for the image.]

Open Wide...

The Woman Card

Earlier today, someone emailed me to ask what I thought about Hillary "playing the woman card" in response to Tuesday night's debate, aka the Attack-a-Thon. His feeling was that it was unfair to attribute the "pile on" to Hillary's being a woman, when she's up about 30% nationally, making her a natural target of the other candidates. Because I've seen a lot of comments in this vein, and particularly because some of them (unlike the aforementioned email) have been quite genuinely nasty, accusing Hillary of playing the "damsel in distress" and being anti-feminist, I'm going to share my reply to the email inquiry as a sort of catch-all response to all the charges along this spectrum.

It absolutely seems like a no-brainer to chalk this up to the fact that the other primary challengers are just going after the frontrunner—because they are going after her and that is logical. What's not being acknowledged, though, and where Hillary has a point (in spite of her not coming right out and saying this, because she simply can't without looking like an arrogant jerk) is that it's probably pretty unusual for so many people to be in a race where the frontrunner is up about 30% nationally, not to mention kicking fundraising ass and showing in most match-ups to be capable of beating all of the possible contenders from the opposition party.

Now, bear in mind that I'm not thrilled (as you know) with Hillary being the Dem frontrunner, because of some of her policy positions, so I'm not saying that I don't want other candidates to stay in and challenge her, and I'm not saying I don't think they should.

What I am saying, given that Hillary is firmly entrenched in the D.C. Democratic establishment and in line with the party platform, is that if Hillary were a man in that position—acceptable candidate with mainline party positions, 30 point lead, and seemingly unlimited fundraising potential—I sincerely doubt that there would still be a stage full of dudes trying to beat her.

I'm not saying I think those guys are misogynists; I just think they recognize (consciously or not) that she has a vulnerability because a lot of voters in the country are misogynists.

So, I don't think it's unfair for her to say they're going after her because she's a woman, although there's a nuance there that's getting missed—though it doesn't necessarily exonerate the guys, if they're trading on other people's sexism, you know? When I hear Edwards going on about how she's not electable, I cringe—because it doesn't matter how you parse it; at its essence, that's a message about her Being A Girl.

Distilling all that down, what I'm saying is that the individual challenges during that debate are not, in my opinion, motivated by any candidate's individual issues with Hillary being a woman. (Except maybe Biden, who's a sexist wanker.) But I do think that there are so many men, nearly all of whom are an incredible long shot for the nomination, still in the race when she's a mainstream, powerhouse candidate, speaks to the fact that she's generally being challenged because of her sex.

FWIW, I think she ought to be challenged. I would think a man in precisely her position with her policies ought to be challenged, too—that's good for our democracy. I just think it's totally unlikely that he ever would be. And that's not unimportant.

---------------------

What I didn’t put in my email response, but will add upon further consideration, is that if the man in the best position to throw a wrench in the Hillary works wasn't black, that, too, would likely effect the number of long shots still vying for the nom. And, again, I'm not suggesting that the candidates themselves are racists, but that they know a lot of voters are.

Which also reminds me of something else I've been seeing a lot of—progressives who say they aren't personally sexist or racist, but think so many other people are, that they can't support Hillary or Obama. And I'm seeing this so frequently lately that I'm wondering if there isn't going to be a vast problem for either or both of them in the primaries based on a ton of people who presume the worst about others, inadvertently turning their sex and race respectively into a liability for all the wrong reasons.

And that variable brings us back to why there are so many dudes hanging around waiting to see what happens in the primaries, despite a frontrunner who was the presumed nominee before she even announced.

Open Wide...