Severe Drought Drying Up The Southeast

A couple of weeks ago, I flew to Atlanta on business and hung out with a friend of mine while I was down there. Among other topics (e.g. Bush sucks, Congress sucks, etc), she brought up how bad the drought has been down there. Right now, restrictions are voluntary, but mandatory restrictions could be just around the corner, which would affect regular water usage in the home.

Without any significant rainfall, Lake Lanier, the city's reservoir, is down to a level that would provide the local residents only 100-200 days' worth of water. Mickey Mellen, who runs Atlanta Water Shortage, has been doing an amazing job at tracking this situation, even to the point of showing daily reservoir levels and rainfall amounts. While Atlanta still has a little time left, a small town in Tennessee has already gone completely dry.

The mighty waterfall that fed the mountain hamlet has been reduced to a trickle, and now the creek running through the center of town is dry.

Three days a week, the volunteer fire chief hops in a 1961 fire truck at 5:30 a.m. - before the school bus blocks the narrow road - and drives a few miles to an Alabama fire hydrant. He meets with another truck from nearby New Hope, Ala. The two drivers make about a dozen runs back and forth, hauling about 20,000 gallons of water from the hydrant to Orme's tank. [...]

"I feel for the folks in Atlanta," he says, his gravelly voice barely rising above the sound of rushing water from the town's tank. "We can survive. We're 145 people. You've got 4.5 million people down there. What are they going to do? It's a scary thought."
Scary thought, indeed. If there are any Shakers in the Atlanta area, please comment on any updates that you know.

Open Wide...

Blowvember Starts with a Bang!

by Blogenfreude

Story #1: Doesn't say whether he's a Republican but, given the events of Cocktober, one can make an educated guess:

Meet Paul Schum. The Kentucky man, a Catholic school principal, is facing a prostitution charge after Louisville police found him dressed like a woman and loitering in an alley Tuesday night.

According to a criminal citation, a copy of which you'll find here, Schum, 50, was wearing fishnet stockings, fake breasts, and "all black leather" when officers discovered him "loitering in high drug trafficking and prostitution area." The citation notes that Schum, who heads Bethlehem High School, had "no reason for why he was in alley ... dressed up in women's leather other than for prostitution." Schum, now on paid leave from his school post, is due in court on November 27 to answer a misdemeanor charge of loitering for the intent of prostitution.
He makes Bob Allen look like an amateur, you'll agree. Smoking Gun has more here.

Story #2: It looks like it'll be a Blowvember to remember - we've got another Larry Craig toe-tapping incident:

DAYTONA BEACH -- A former Daytona Beach city commissioner and a local high school teacher arrested Thursday during a sex sting at a Volusia mall bathroom were released from the Volusia County Brach Jail today, authorities said.

Former commissioner and mayoral candidate Mike Shallow and David Behringer, an athletic trainer and teacher at Seabreeze High School, posted $1,000 bail today after midnight, a jail spokesman said.

(snip)

"Most everything that's occurring is nonverbal," said Sgt. Jeff Hoffman, supervisor of the criminal suppression team.

Offenders coughed or sneezed, tapped their feet, sometimes under the stall beside them, or made loud zipper noises to attract attention from others interested in engaging in sexual acts, Hoffman said.
Again, no evidence he's a Republican, but Paddy's post outs him as a conservative.

UPDATE: Melissa emailed me regarding Shallow's party affiliation: "Here, under "Friday, July 20th, 2007" - Shallow contributed to the campaign of Volusia County States Attorney John Tanner, who, according to here, is a Republican. So, if he's not a registered Republican, he nonetheless contributes their campaigns!"

(Cross-posted from Agitprop.)

Open Wide...

How Odd!

[Part Seven in an ongoing series about the media's insistence on trivializing women's lives, actions, experiences, and issues by categorizing as "Odd News" stories about the mistreatment of women, or stories about women that aren't "odd" in any way aside from the fact that there's a women at their centers. Part One, Part Two, Part Three, Part Four, Part Five, Part Six.]

Reuters' Oddly Enough has really outdone themselves today:


Not one, but two hilariously odd stories about rape! At least they get credit for actually using the word "rape" (an omission so common it has necessitated a multiple part series of its own), but that's not much consolation when the act is treated as zany fodder for the Odd News section—and this pair of "Odd Tales" is particularly grim.

Court considers "Lotto rapist" damages case: "Iorworth Hoare, dubbed the 'Lotto rapist' by the press, had no money when he was jailed for life at Leeds Crown Court in 1989 for the attempted rape of Mrs A. But in 2004 he won 7 million pounds after buying a ticket during day release from prison shortly before being freed on parole. Mrs A, who [was 59 when Hoare attacked her as she walked in a Leeds park in broad daylight in 1988 and did not sue for damages at the time of Hoare's imprisonment because she had been told his lack of funds would have made it worthless], argued that Hoare should be made to pay for his 'violent and disgusting sexual assault' that had left her mentally scarred. … But the High Court said in 2005 that she could not make a compensation claim because she was outside the legal six-year limit to sue for damages."

Ha ha ha! How splendidly odd!

Spider bite no excuse for rape, court says: "An Australian man who kidnapped and raped a woman blamed his actions on a spider, local media reported on Thursday. Philip Spiers pleaded guilty to the kidnap and rape, but told a court that the poison from a funnel-web spider bite had left him with a viral illness which led to his actions. But a toxicologist told the New South Wales state District Court there was no medical evidence to suggest a spider bite could be responsible for anger and hatred. Spiers, who kidnapped and raped the woman in 1997, was sentenced on Wednesday to eight years in jail."

Ha ha ha! What a kook!

This duo of wacky oddities comes, by the two, just two days after Reuters framed as Odd News a story about women-only subway cars being introduced in Seoul because sexual assault is so frequent on subways: "Nearly half the crimes reported on the city's eight subway lines are sexual in nature, with many taking place on two lines that serve university and office districts. … Several Tokyo train lines have tried women-only carriages to prevent groping."

Again, as I was when subway groping was used as part of a joke in a Playtex bra ad, I'm completely mystified by the idea that entire raison d'être for HollaBack NYC, HollaBack Chicago, HollaBack Boston, HollaBack San Francisco, HollaBack Seattle, HollaBack D.C., HollaBack Texas, HollaBack Pennsylvania, HollaBack Colorado, HollaBack Canada, and probably some I'm missing is treated like No Big Deal.

Women's bodies being treated as public property isn't funny–and it's not "odd" by any definition of the word. And women forced to separate themselves from men in public places to maintain their sense of safety is neither funny nor odd, either.

It's tragic.

(Crossposted at WIMN's Voices.)

Open Wide...

It's All Relative

by Sarah in Chicago

The well-used cliché of the outrageous homophobe that doth protest too much over their supposed adherence to the vanilla-tropes of straightdom ("I'm so straight, missionaries do me!"), until the inevitable occurs, and said 'dothing' is revealed to be so much Shakespearian hyperbole when it is found that their version of vanilla has cookie-dough in it, is a well established part of queer and progressive lore.

[and yes, I very much AM a fan of the well-crafted run-on sentence, thank you, why do you ask?]

However, what is far less revealed is that those raving anti-gay bigots that do evidently play with matching sets of luggage despite the above cliché, do nonetheless perhaps also have some queer effects (or is that affects?) down the ... well, line, so to speak. What I am speaking of, of course, is the phenomenon of the queer child of the homophobe.

I can speak from personal experience here, as I'm the spawn of two parents who are charter members of the "queer-throwing" association. My parents threw me out of the house when it was revealed that their daughter preferred vagina-diving as a sport (for the second time, natch, since their response to the first time it was revealed, namely a long river voyage in Egypt, didn't work out as successfully a strategy as they had hoped) and then didn't talk to me for nearly 8 years (thankfully I then lived in a country that plans for such eventualities, and the government stepped in to make it possible for me to go to university).

The classic line comes from my father, who thought gays and lesbians chose to be such because "it was easier, as they are afraid of the amount of work a relationship between two people so incredibly different as a man and a woman takes". Yay, Dad! Polarising sexism, ignorance, and homophobia in one theory! All we need now is some nice hard-boiled racism and we've got it hit for six.

[Oh, and btw, for the bigot nutjobs out there? All these tactics don't actually work. I'm still a big fan of the muff-spelunking.]

Needless to say, this has made me particularly sensitive to those queer kids who similarly are raised by parents who wouldn't know tolerance if it turned up in a pro-tolerance t-shirt, carrying a tolerance banner, and having a 6-foot flashing pink neon-sign of 'Tolerance Teh Rulez!" hovering overhead.

Unconditional parental love is an interesting hypothetical confluence of syllables to these people.

So, it was with a bit of a "I'm so not surprised, they're baking me a huge bloody 'Congratulations, You're Totally Not Surprised' cake" response to the revelation that the daughter of Amy Contrada, one of the leaders of the rabidly anti-gay MassResistance (interesting and ironic name for an organisation that is inherently about supporting a prejudiced status-quo ... but hey, maybe it's the intellectual elitist espresso-drinking snob in me being picky), is actually a raving lesbo.

I am a lesbian, which my mom still does not get. She just says that I am confused. I realized in around eighth grade, but I was in denial for quite some time because I was scared due to my mother constantly saying that homosexuality is wrong. How can it ever be wrong to love though? That’s what I’d like to know.
Go Claudia, it's your birthday!

This young woman is both awesomely inspiring in her courage and ability to stand up and say who and what she really is, and completely a reflection of our times. Now, admittedly, I'm only 33, but I do wish I had had the ability at her age to stand up to the person that at that age is the most important person in your life and "No, Mom/Mum, THIS is who I am" and announce it to the world. Both a needed thing to encourage others to do so too, and something that must scare you shitless, because you're inherently undermining something your parent is putting so much effort, drive, and plain-old hate into.

Because if you think Amy is going to respect her daughter for this, I've got a lovely bridge you might be interested in.

This was also after earlier this week, the Cambodian Prime Minister disowned one of his daughters after she got married to another woman. I personally love the last sentence in that piece:

Despite his action toward his daughter, Hun Sen in his speech to the graduating class at the National Institute of Education appealed to parents and society not to discriminate against gay people.
Because, you know, nothing says love and non-discrimination like throwing your daughter out of the family. Good show, old chap, good show! After a bit of further research, I discovered that during the announcement of said disowning, there was particular emphasis through the repeated use of the word "adopted" before the word "daughter" by the prime minister. Yup, not only am I throwing you out of the family, but you never really were in it to begin with! But remember, don't discriminate against gay people! Heh-heh.

Anyway, I did a little digging, and came up with this list:

Vice President Dick Cheney’s daughter Mary is a lesbian, who just had a baby with her lesbian partner, Heather.

Former Senator and arch-conservative Jesse Helms, who blamed gays and lesbians for "the proliferation of AIDS" and denouncing the use of the word gay because "there's nothing gay about them," has a lesbian granddaughter.

Phyllis Schlafly, founder of the conservative Eagle Forum, was instrumental in drafting the Republican Party platform language opposing gay marriage and civil unions, has a gay son, John.

Barry "Mr. Conservative" Goldwater (who in later years came out in favor of gay rights) had a gay grandson and a lesbian grandniece.

Nixon's Chief of Staff and Watergate convict H.R. Haldeman had a gay child.

President of the National Association for Research & Therapy of Homosexuality Charles Socarides, has a gay son Richard, who was liaison to the gay community under President Clinton.

Then of course there is Alan Keyes, GOP presidential candidate, family-values harper, and the guy that tried to keep Barack Obama from the Illinois Senate seat, tossed his college-student daughter, Maya, who came out during his campaign against Barack out of the family home and cut off her tuition money.

The late California state Sen. Pete Knight who spearheaded the ultimately successful Proposition 22 that bans gay marriage in California, has a gay son, David, who married his partner during San Francisco queer marriage rush in '04.

Sadie Fields, state chair of the Christian Coalition of Georgia, who helped push the constitutional ban on gay marriage, has a gay daughter, Tess.

Bill Byrne, who was head of the Cobb County Commission in 1993 when it passed a resolution proclaiming “the homosexual lifestyle” unwelcome in the suburban Atlanta community, has a lesbian daughter Shannon.

Regina Griggs, an executive director of Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays and Gays (PFOX)—ie the group set up to mimic and oppose PFLAG—has a gay son.

Anti-gay rights and pro-life activist Randall Terry, has a gay son, Jamiel.

Robert Mosbacher, the man heading President Bush's national reelection campaign in 2004, and later chief fund-raiser, has a lesbian daughter, Dee.

Former Republican House Speaker Newt Gingrich’s half-sister Candace is a lesbian.


I swear, it's beginning to get to the point where we may be able to come up with a formula:

'P(q)' ~ 1 / 'T'

Where the probability 'P' of your child being a raving homo 'q', is inversely proportional to your tolerance 'T' of LGBTQI peeps in general.

So, you raving fundies and jeebus-freaks out there, if you want to get rid of the queers, it's fairly obvious what you need to do; ya's need to start with the luvin'!! Love ya some dykes! Lubs a fag!! Squeeze the stuffing out of a trans-peep! Because, you know, if ya just hate us, there's just going to be more of us! We're like bacteria, the more you use antibiotics, the stronger we get!

So, my concluding question ... can anyone else think of any other children or grandchildren of prominent homophobes? Because, I think we may have a trend happening here ...

And we're all doing it, so you wouldn't want to be left out of the cool kids, would you?

Open Wide...

2007 Weblog Awards: Polls Are Open!

The 2007 Weblog Awards

As Melissa pointed out yesterday, Shakesville is one of the nominated finalists as Best Liberal Blog. So, break out those purple fingers and cast your vote!

You'll be able to vote once a day till the polls close on November 8th.

Open Wide...

Quote of the Day

"Listen Barack Obama, John Edwards and all you other soon-to-be also-rans, lay off Hillary. She's well on her way to winning the nomination and we don't want anything to stand in her way, especially attacks on her character and integrity that might sidetrack her on the way to being your party's standard bearer.

So leave her alone, let her cruise her way to the nomination so we Republicans can have the pleasure of dissecting her in the general election campaign." - Michael Reagan, Townhall.com
Oooh, I'm fwightened.

You would think that the righties would go all out to try to convince the voters that they have positive ideas about how to move the country forward. But these are the Republicans. They don't work that way. Besides, they sure as hell can't run on the record of the last Republican president, and if their current crop of candidates is the best they've got, it's easy to see why the only thing they think they can run on is Drudging up old news, gossip, and half-assed stories about the Clinton administration. This is the best that they've got, and it's all that they've got.

Cross-posted from Bark Bark Woof Woof.

Open Wide...

You Can Have One, But You Can't Have Both

Interesting thought here from David Schraub at The Debate Link [via Amp]:

[T]here is a very predictable media narrative that will form if two members of politically underrepresented groups appear on the Democratic ticket. One person is ground-breaking and history-making. Two people, by contrast, is an “affirmative action” choice and proof the Democrats are in thrall to “interest groups.” If Obama picks a woman, it will undoubtedly be cast as “appeasing” women’s groups who were ready to see Clinton break the ultimate glass ceiling. If Clinton picks a Black running mate, same thing, except replace NOW with the NAACP. This is what Derrick Bell calls the unspoken limit on affirmative action. Even if at first the diversity is applauded, at some point folks will start getting uncomfortable with too many women or people of color. A presidential ticket that doesn’t include a White male is virtually inconceivable, and it’s equally inconceivable that the media won’t make heavy note of that fact in the unlikely instance it comes into being.
And, despite the fact it really goes without saying, that white male will have to be straight and cisgendered and not different in ability or appearance, as well.

This is yet another example of why oppressed/marginalized groups are natural allies; prejudices against any of us work against all of us.

It's amazing, too, how many times you'll hear complaints about an exclusion of women, or gays, or people of color, from this event or that list or this level of leadership or wev, met with the old "minorities are well represented" chestnut, as if, as long as there's an Asian guy and a black guy, women shouldn't have anything about which to complain, or as long as there are women, gays shouldn't complain, or as long as there are gay men, lesbians shouldn't complain, or as long as there are white women, women of color shouldn't complain. Et cetera.

I recall noting to the organizer of a panel in which I was asked to participate on—I kid you not—academic diversity that the panel itself was rather problematic, given that it was comprised of seven straight white men, one gay white man…and me. And the organizer very earnestly said to me, "What do you mean? We've got a gay guy—and a woman!"

Oh well that's all right then!

Obviously, with only nine panelists, it wasn't like I was suggesting that a representative of every possible manifestation of human variation be included, but it was shocking that someone keen to organize a discussion about diversity would fail to understand that including minority viewpoints doesn't mean "Add a gay guy and a woman," as if the wholesale exclusion of people of color, for example, not only didn't matter but didn't matter because a gay guy and a woman were there, as if we could speak to the experience of people of color just because we're minorities. It was a very bizarre case of Not Getting It.

But at least he was trying—and he understood and took on board what I said when I explained the problem to him.

I've been in other situations where I've had less luck. I was once putting together a promotional brochure and suggested that the type of people represented using their product should be more diverse. There were maybe two dozen people in family groups indicated in the layout on this piece; I offered that we should bear in mind when choosing models, in addition to the standard white families as those used in all the previous marketing materials, we ought to represent families of color, a same-sex couple, a disabled parent or child in a family, and people of different size and stature.

After a pitiful discussion I won't recount, in which I eventually managed to convey that by representing "people of different size and stature" I meant fatties and dwarves, the guy for whom I was working exclaimed: "Jesus Christ! She wants me to turn this thing into a damn freak show!"

And, really, that's just the un-PC way of saying "in thrall to interest groups.” It's fine to have a token on the Democratic ticket—but let's not turn this thing into a freak show.

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime

Korg: 70,000 BC


"A great Hanna-Barbera offering from 1974 that dramatized the daily lives of a prehistoric family. Burgess Meredith narrated the stories."

Open Wide...

Lieberman: STFU

Just. Stop. Talking.

To reject the nomination of Judge Michael Mukasey because he refuses to say what some members want him to say on this question, and he refuses as a matter of sincerely held legal belief...would be grossly unfair, an unjust act to this judge. May I suggest an alternative course...confirm him!
Wow! What a great idea! Not getting a satisfactory answer about the law from the guy who wants the job of the top lawman in the land? Eh, roll the dice and confirm him anyway!

Douche.

[H/T Blogenfreude]

Open Wide...

Quote of the Day

"Given the nature of the enemy and the words of its leaders, politicians who deny that we are at war are either being disingenuous or naïve. Either way, it is dangerous for our country. We are at war—and we cannot win this war by wishing it away or pretending it does not exist."President Bush, today, during a speech to The Heritage Foundation.

Yes, that's right. The man who refuses to acknowledge that we haven't enough troops, funds, will, or even diplomats to sustain an endless "war on terror" that is actually making our country less safe, the largest front of which was launched under false pretenses, just accused those of us who still have a grip on fucking reality of being disingenuous, naïve, and/or delusional.

446 days, bitchez.

Open Wide...

Blog Note

I've finally added (thanks to Space Cowboy's diligent efforts) social bookmarking tags to the end of each post, so now you're able to easily favorite, share, and refer Shakesposts to sites like Digg, Reddit, etc.

If you have any problems with the tags, let me know. And spread the love, Shakers!

Open Wide...

Bush: Against Representative Democracy

Another brilliant codpiece quote from his speech today at the Heritage Foundation:

When it comes to funding our troops, some in Washington should spend more time responding to the warnings of terrorists like Osama bin Laden and the requests of our commanders on the ground, and less time responding to the demands of MoveOn.org bloggers and Code Pink protesters.
There's nothing more pathetic than Bush trying to be topical and hip by using the word "bloggers." Well, actually I can think of a couple of things.

For starters, there's the attitude of democracy only taking place at the ballot box. Purple fingers can only be wielded at election time, after which people need to STFU. Sorry, George, but it doesn't work that way. Since you know about blogging and teh Google, then you won't be at all intimidated when I tell you to look up representative democracy on Wikipedia. What's that? No, not pedophilia. Wikipedia. It's like an encyclopedia on... never mind. Just have your fucking staff look it up. I think you'll be surprised to see that in our kind of democracy, folks are elected to represent their constituents. At election time comes the electing, after which comes the representing. Get it yet? No? Alright well let's try the next item then.

"...responding to the warnings of terrorists like Osama bin Laden" You've got to be shitting me right here. Seriously. Is it Bush or his speech-writer that's dumber than a bag of hammers? Bush is going to stand on that podium and lecture ME about responding to warnings of the one guy that he has still been unable to catch for six years?

Stop it right now.

Really.

That's some real brave and tough talk from someone who, as early as 2002, stated that he "was not that concerned about [Bin Laden]." And yet, look at all of the people who applaud this statement as if it's a vindication of some sort. The pathetic asshats that are still left around sacrificing their first born in support of Bush who don't get how stupid he sounds. Why in the world would he be willing to lecture people while highlighting his biggest failure ever since this dumbass war began? Call me a drugged optimist, but there has GOT to be at least one person on the other side of the aisle who is shaking his/her head in embarrassment over Bush's insistence on bringing up Bin Laden's name and trying to keep this thing going until he's out of office. Anyone? Bueller?

I guess I can't blame him for trying. After all, even Bush knows that he's a useless turd for the next year, and the most he can do is try to keep everyone's attention on him for at least a few more months, before everyone starts pushing him out of the way. And then when January 20, 2009 rolls around, the only memory left of Bush for us to dine on will be all the work we have to do to clean up his fucking mess.

Can't wait.

Open Wide...

Ugh.

South Carolina Democrats say no to Colbert. Prove they have no sense of humor. Wankers.

Open Wide...

Inside Rummy

Robin Wright at the Washington Post has uncovered memos from former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld that give an interesting insight into his views on Muslims, elevating the threat of war, and "sacrifice."

In a series of internal musings and memos to his staff, then-Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld argued that Muslims avoid "physical labor" and wrote of the need to "keep elevating the threat," "link Iraq to Iran" and develop "bumper sticker statements" to rally public support for an increasingly unpopular war.
The memos, often referred to as "snowflakes," shed light on Rumsfeld's brusque management style and on his efforts to address key challenges during his tenure as Pentagon chief. Spanning from 2002 to shortly after his resignation following the 2006 congressional elections, a sampling of his trademark missives obtained yesterday reveals a defense secretary disdainful of media criticism and driven to reshape public opinion of the Iraq war.

Rumsfeld, whose sometimes abrasive approach often alienated other Cabinet members and White House staff members, produced 20 to 60 snowflakes a day and regularly poured out his thoughts in writing as the basis for developing policy, aides said. The memos are not classified but are marked "for official use only."

In a 2004 memo on the deteriorating situation in Iraq, Rumsfeld concluded that the challenges there are "not unusual." Pessimistic news reports -- "our publics risk falling prey to the argument that all is lost" -- simply result from the wrong standards being applied, he wrote in one of the memos obtained by The Washington Post.

Under siege in April 2006, when a series of retired generals denounced him and called for his resignation in newspaper op-ed pieces, Rumsfeld produced a memo after a conference call with military analysts. "Talk about Somalia, the Philippines, etc. Make the American people realize they are surrounded in the world by violent extremists," he wrote.

People will "rally" to sacrifice, he noted after the meeting. "They are looking for leadership. Sacrifice = Victory."
Is it just me, or does Rumsfeld come off as just as much of a jerk in private as he does in public? In his mind, the war in Iraq wasn't going badly because he and the rest of the neocons hadn't planned on this being a long struggle, they weren't prepared for the insurgency, and they didn't send in enough troops with the right equipment or sufficient training in spite of the fact that anyone with a passing knowledge of human nature and geopolitics knew that going to war in Iraq would only breed resentment and terrorism against the United States and western civilization in general. No, it was because they didn't sell it right and that damned liberal media wasn't buying their propaganda that everything was just peachy. Look, schools are getting painted! But we weren't buying it because "the wrong standards were being applied." What standards could he possibly be talking about? Vietnam? Dresden? The Bataan Death March? Dr. Strangelove?

What's perhaps the most telling thread running through these memos is that Rumsfeld's primary mission was to basically scare the crap out of the country. That way the Bush administration could do whatever they wanted in terms of war and conquest. It's not like there isn't historical precedent for such thinking; it's been the modus operandi of every dictator and warlord since they figured out that fear was the most effective method of getting what they wanted.

Cross-posted from Bark Bark Woof Woof.

Open Wide...

Get thee behind me…uh, bounty hunter person!

Okay, so I’ve already gone off on the whole Dog the Bounty Hunter thing and just about everything that can be said has been said.

But news that Reverend Sharpton is open to meeting with Dog The Forgiveness Hunter gave a bitch pause.

What exactly happens at these meetings? Is it a Black People Pitch where Rev. Al makes the case for why black is beautiful?

Will Rev. Al lay hands upon Dog the Bounty Hunter and attempt to cast out the demon bigot that may inhabit his perpetually sun burnt body?

Will snake dancing be involved?

Blink.

Or will this meeting be yet another let me tell you why I think you’re wrong between limited commercial interruptions media spectacular that does nothing to address Dog the Bounty Hunter, his comments or his continued presence on A&E television?

Hmmm.

Fuck it, this bitch is craving a snake dancing casting out of bigot demons combo meal…

Open Wide...

Uh-Oh...

America's Mayor has got some 'splaining to do:

A couple of weeks ago, Brave New Films released a devastating six-minute clip about a Rudy Giuliani’s Achilles heel: his decision to ignore (and lie about) concerns over the FDNY’s radio equipment, which ultimately cost so many lives on 9/11.


Thanks to the film and 20,000 petition signatures collected in response, the city is going to launch an investigation.

Here's the video clip, in case you haven't seen it yet.

Open Wide...

Caption This Photo



Girl, his feet don't look that big to me. I ain't impressed.

[Story here.]

Open Wide...

Second Verse, Same as the First: Diplomats Edition

I just said earlier that President Whiny McPoopypants can blame the Congress all he wants for not funding the war, but Congress doesn't have anything to do with the Army's staffing problems. They also don't have anything to do with the fact that US diplomats would rather quit than be sent to Iraq.

At a rare, contentious meeting, foreign service officers told senior State Department officials that the move to fill vacancies in Baghdad puts them in danger, jeopardizes the well-being of their families, and could deplete the ranks of those willing to serve overseas at a critical time. Several diplomats said privately they would resign rather than accept orders to serve in Iraq.

…The State Department has struggled to find Foreign Service volunteers to fill 48 of the 252 diplomatic posts that will become vacant next summer in Baghdad as well as other Iraqi provinces. To solve the problem, the department decided on mandatory service in Baghdad if too few volunteers step forward. Yesterday, at a packed meeting to discuss the plan, foreign service officers spoke out passionately against it, an unusual display of internal dissent.

Jack Crotty, a senior Foreign Service officer who has worked overseas, told his superiors that being forced to serve in Iraq is a "potential death sentence and you know it."

"It's one thing if someone believes in what's going on over there and volunteers," he said, according to the Associated Press, "but it's another thing to send someone over there on a forced assignment."
Juan Cole says the US embassy in Iraq should just be closed, given that "kidnapping our most capable diplomats and putting them in front of a fire squad is morally wrong and is administratively stupid, since many of these intrepid individuals will simply resign."

Bush is a lunatic. This war is over. O. ver. There are not enough troops to sustain it, there is not enough money to sustain it, there is not enough will to sustain it, there are not even enough freaking diplomats to sustain it. It's done.

And if he can't face that reality on his own, then by god Congress needs to rub his nose in it like a bad puppy in his own piddle until he gets the fucking message at long last.

And then they need to impeach his criminal ass.

[H/T to Oddjob, who hat tips Sully.]

Open Wide...

Waterboarding

Arlen takes a look at two different stories that put into stark perspective how ridiculous and dishonest the ongoing debate (why is this even an ongoing debate?!) about waterboarding.

First: Don't let pesky facts get in the way, WSJ…

The Wall Street Journal editorial page has no idea what the hell it is even talking about:

Just when you thought someone might be confirmed in Washington without a partisan fight, Senate Democrats are suggesting they may not approve Michael Mukasey as Attorney General after all. The judge's offense is that he's declined to declare "illegal" an interrogation technique in the war on terror that Congress itself has never specifically banned.
Um, Congress does not need to declare it illegal. It already is illegal. Waterboarding is completely and entirely illegal under US domestic law. Completely and entirely illegal. ... Does Congress have to brand beating somebody to death "illegal"? No, of course not, there are already laws against that. The same is true of waterboarding, although the WSJ apparently does not realize this.
Way to best yourselves in being the most frighteningly moronic and evil editorial board in the nation, WSJ.

Next: White House Counselor Ed Gillespie is dirty rotten liar.

White House legal counsel Ed Gillespie is now claiming:

…first of all, this technique [waterboarding], we don't know that it's used by the government or is used by the government. That's never been confirmed by the U.S. government.
Is that true? Of course not.
Of course not.

There are plenty more examples of how utterly mendacious this debate really is (also see: Shamanic as but one example), but, in the end, I just keep coming back to wondering why the fuck there's even a debate in the first place.

Open Wide...

Weblog Awards

The 2007 Weblog Awards finalists have been announced and Shakesville is among the finalists for Best Liberal Blog. (I didn't even know nominations were open, so this was quite a surprise!)

The other nominees in our category are: Hullabaloo, Think Progress, Pandagon, skippy the bush kangaroo, Orcinus, Firedoglake, Newshoggers, Kiko's House, Glenn Greenwald's Unclaimed Territory, Talking Points Memo, and Feministing.

It's always going to be a weird list, because there are way more blogs that deserve to be there than there are finalist slots. Even if you like all the nominees, there's always going to be a "Where's Eschaton? Where's The Carpetbagger Report? Where's Crooks & Liars?" thing happening. (Though your "where" list may vary.)

Anyway, many congratulations to contributor Jon Swift, who was nominated for Funniest Blog. Funny? What do they mean funny? Are you trying to tell me that he isn't a reasonable conservative who gets all his news from Fox News, Rush Limbaugh and Jay Leno monologues? I don't believe it.

And more congratulations to my bloggrrl Pam, who was nominated for Best LGBT Blog, along with some of our other favies: Republic of T, Joe My God, Susie Bright, The Bilerico Project, Keith Boykin, Fetch me my axe, and Mombian.

Check out the whole list here. Voting begins tonight.

Open Wide...