Nice

Shaker Darms pointed me to this post at the good Roger Ailes' place, which reports that Republican presidential candidate Duncan Hunter has hired Henry Jordan as his South Carolina campaign co-chair. That would be the same Henry Jordan as this one:

A state Board of Education member, talking Tuesday about displaying the Ten Commandments in public schools, had a ready suggestion for groups who might object to it.

"Screw the Buddhists and kill the Muslims," Dr. Henry Jordan said during the board's finance and legislative committee meeting. "And put that in the minutes," he added.
Golly, after conservatives went completely apeshit over a low-level staffer's use of the word "Christofascist," I can't wait to hear what they have to say about that!

Ahem.

Open Wide...

Zoinks

My favorite wingnut, Michele "Grabby Grabberson" Bachmann, is at it again:

Whackjob member of Congress Michelle Bachmann, it turns out, has discovered that there's already a plan in place to divide Iraq. Iran will get half the country. And they'll set that part up as a "terrorist safe haven zone."

Says Bachmann: "And half of Iraq, the western, northern portion of Iraq, is going to be called…. the Iraq State of Islam, something like that. And I'm sorry, I don't have the official name, but it's meant to be the training ground for the terrorists. There's already an agreement made."

I can't wait to hear Juan Cole's reaction to Bachmann's scoop.
Nor me.

Me4Pres says: "My congressperson is more smarter than yours. Well, she is more something anyway. Commence with the jealousy because your congressperson does not get information like mine does. Maybe if your congressperson's erotic sex dreams involved God, they would know this type of stuff." True dat.

Memories…

Open Wide...

What did the Maryland delegate say to the trucker?

I can clearly see your nuts. And I don't like it!

As the General Assembly debates global warming and the death penalty, [Republican delegate LeRoy E. Myers Jr.] has something else on his mind: the outsized plastic testicles that truckers dangle from the trailer hitches of their pickups.

To some truckers, they are manly expressions of rural chic. But Myers, who says his Western Maryland district is brimming with giant fakes on the roadways, calls them vulgar and immoral—and filed legislation this week to outlaw them.

"People are making a joke out of it," Myers said yesterday. "But I think it's a pretty serious problem. You have body parts hanging from the hitches of cars. We've crossed a line."

His bill would prohibit motorists from displaying anything resembling or depicting "anatomically correct" or "less than completely and opaquely covered" human or animal genitals, human buttocks or female breasts. The offense would carry a penalty.
The penalty? Six hours with LeRoy Myers, Jr.

Hours One and Two: Good clean fun watching slideshows of Myers family vacations past, including excursions to Lollipop Land and the Pantaloons Museum.

Hour Three: Quiet Bible study.

Hours Four through Six: Good clean fun going around town disguising displayed novelty testicles with happy Magic Marker messages.


The truck ornament industry is not amused. "It's not a perverted sexual thing at all," said David Ham, founder of Your Nutz, a San Diego-based business that sells more than 200 kinds of fake testicles. "It's a sense of humor. This lawmaker is looking out for two or three old women in tennis shoes. He's got too much time on his hands."
First of all, I had no idea there were over 200 kinds of fake testicles, or that fake testicles were in such high demand that there was a need for over 200 kinds of testicles. Interesting.

Secondly, how did old women in tennis shoes get dragged into this?! All the old women in tennis shoes I know would find this entire thing hilarious. Once again, women are getting the bad rap because some cranky old geezer's got his man-panties in a twist. Come on, David Ham, founder of Your Nutz—give the gals a break!

Finally, if this bill passes (it won't), I say all of us outfit our cars with a dozen pairs of fake balls, boobs, or buttocks—or a combination of all three; whatever your fancy!—and drive just to the Maryland border, where we'll park and blare our car horns and yell, "Nyah nyah—you can't touch me, cuz I'm outside your staaaaaaaaate!"

Open Wide...

Friday Rat Terrier Blogging


Back in the olden days when I had cats, they used to run and hide under the covers when I would change the sheets on the bed. I'd never seen a dog get all worked up about bed making until we got Rory. It's impossible to put new sheets on the bed; she jumps up and runs around on them, grabbing at them when you pull on the sides to put them in place. Her other favorite game is to sit on the sheets while you're pulling them, getting a ride.

Open Wide...

Would You Like Your Own Show on FOX?

It's very simple: Just circle your qualifications below, and you're well on your way to co-hosting your own show on FOX, "The Unbiased Network!"

1. Are you prepared to publish home addresses online of people you don't agree with, subtly encouraging your readers to harass them with death threats, and when confronted with your actions, do it again? Are you fully prepared to play the victim when this happens to you?

2. Are you prepared to attack people on national television without doing the slightest bit of research as to the truth of your statements? Are you prepared to shamelessly lie about these people? (Don't worry, you'll never have to fear being challenged by an actual response!) Are you ready to go to ridiculous, embarrassing lengths to mock them?

3. Are you prepared to completely fabricate controversies, and when caught being completely wrong, refuse to apologize or admit error?

4. Do you have any qualms about gleefully sniggering over the divorce of someone you don't happen to like?

5. Are you willing to insinuate that a war hero's wounds were self-inflicted in order to hide the spotty military record of a Republican Presidential candidate?

6. Do you have any qualms about fanning the fires of racism?

7. Are you ready to distort and lie, regardless of how transparent your lies may be? (Hint: Don't forget to refuse to admit error again!)

8. Are you ready to publish a badly researched book defending one of the most shameful chapters in America's history?

9. Are you ready to follow it up with another sloppy book, full of cherry-picking and distortions? When you're directly confronted with a thorough dissection of this book, are you fully prepared to ignore any requests to response or debate?

10. Are you completely, utterly shameless?

Have we got a job for you!

Fox News Channel is testing another pilot on Sunday that will air following its experiment in news satire, ‘The ½ Hour News Hour.’ ‘It’s Out There,’ a half-hour of stories derived from blogs, will get a half-hour test run following Joel Surnow’s satirical take on news. [The show], fronted by conservative blogger-columnist Michele Malkin and former Clinton administration operative Kirsten Powers, will take on political and cultural issues enflaming the blogosphere.

Get ready for your closeup; you're FOX-Worthy!

Open Wide...

Know what's hilarious?

Hitting trannies with axes.

Wednesday night [Jimmy Kimmel] reverted to 5th grade boy behavior while interviewing Rebecca Romijn who plays a transgendered character on Ugly Betty. Kimmel mocked transgendered men and women by showing photos of various transsexuals like Rene Richards. At one point he holds up a photo of Rene and says, "This is a famous one, Rene Richards. Perhaps the most feminine of the group I'm about to show."

Nice. Real nice. Then he holds up a picture of Amanda LePore and some other folks as well. Kimmel then wants to know how the producers of Ugly Betty made the leap from the people he just mocked to someone as feminine as Romijn.

What a twit.

…Later Kimmel reads from a book which he finishes up by joking about someone learning a transgendered person has a penis and reacting by hitting them with an ax. Perhaps Gwen Araujuo's mom should pay Kimmel a visit. Kimmel should be embarrassed talking about transgender issues this way. It's exactly where gay people were thirty years ago and I hope GLAAD and the HRC let him hear about it.

I thought Rebecca Romijn did a good job responding to Kimmel's heinous bullshit. I would have liked to see her point out that a lack of femininity in any woman doesn't justify violence against her, and that heightened femininity shouldn't (and doesn't) act like some sort of magical shield, but considering she probably didn't expect to be faced with such an onslaught of ignorance, she did pretty well. And the important point, which she made quite firmly, was that she wouldn't disrespect her MTF friend by regarding her as anything but a woman.

Unlike the sad sack of shit interviewing her.

[H/T Autumn Sandeen.]

Open Wide...

Friday Cat Blogging

Olivia



Such a wee hunter. Always alert.



She loves to spend time hanging out on the desk,
looking out the window at the birds and squirrels.
Matilda wouldn't go outside if you promised to pay her
ten fresh mackerels, but Olivia adores hanging out on the
back deck and sitting in (or standing at) the window.

Matilda



Apparently, Matilda is a zombie. Her new favorite toy
is a squeezy-brain I got at B-Fest. She carries the thing
around with her all the time, and is constantly dropping it
at my feet and then whining plaintively until I throw it.
She loves playing fetch more than any dog I've ever met.
Every time I see her sauntering toward me with the brain
in her mouth, I have to say, zombie-like, "BRAAAAINS!"



What a mug. Honestly. She is hilariously weird.

Open Wide...

Giuliani the Jokester

On Wednesday, Steve said, "Democrats have to define Giuliani now—as scary, as Bush Redux, as something."

How does "Someone Who, Limbaugh-Like, Makes Fun of Parkinson's Patients" grab ya?


For those who can't see the video (via Arlen), it's a clip from a documentary called Giuliani Time in which Giuliani spends part of the weekly radio show he had as mayor of NYC making fun of a Parkinson's patient who called to complain that Giuliani's policies had resulted in his being purged from the food stamp and Medicaid rolls several times. In spite of being told the caller is sick, Giuliani doesn't bother to find out what's wrong with him or that he's physically disabled, but instead starts mocking him, telling him he sounds like he's in a hole and that he's "breathing funny."

And then: "There's something really wrong with you, John. There really is. I can hear it in your voice. Now why don't you stay on the line, we'll take your name and your number, and we'll send you psychiatric help, because you seriously need it."

What a charmer.

Open Wide...

Happy Blogiversary...

...to The Carpetbagger Report!

Open Wide...

Second Rape by Iraqi Security Forces

The WaPo headlines this story Rape of Second Sunni Woman by Iraqi Security Forces Alleged, but the lede is "An Iraqi police official in the northwestern city of Tall Afar said Thursday that a military officer and three soldiers had admitted to raping a Sunni woman and recording the act with a cellphone camera." After a confession and a recording, "alleged" is rather silly.

Anyway, Prime Minister Maliki continues to assert that the first woman who came forward is lying "to exacerbate sectarian tension and undermine a U.S. and Iraqi security plan to pacify the capital." Seems to me that Maliki is doing more to exacerbate tensions by calling the woman a liar, calling her accused attackers heroes, and behaving like a dictator, because his pig-headedness has resulted in "300 insurgents hav[ing] volunteered to conduct suicide operations to avenge the woman who came forward Monday" if she won't get justice any other way.

Especially now that there is a second rape on record that even the rapists don't dispute, it's important for Maliki to be reasonable. Like, for instance, Iraqi President Jalal Talabani, who issued a statement saying the courts are "the only legitimate place to examine such allegations" and warning that the government should avoid "inflam[ing] sensitivities and creat[ing] mistrust," a sentiment seconded by Vice President Tariq al-Hashimi.

Meanwhile, we're making a huge mistake by staying out of it, "even though many Iraqis view the Americans as the only potential impartial arbiter." U.S. officials "initially said they would issue a statement on the case but later said discussing it would violate patient privacy guidelines," which is a pitiful excuse for not wanting to get involved, after the woman went public and Maliki's been emailing her medical records all over creation. What's the point of withholding the truth? It's not like the situation is just going to go away if the Americans don't say anything; if an eruption of violence is inevitable, at least the truth should be part of that equation.

Smell the freedom spreading.

Open Wide...

Bin Laden: Moral Paragon

If you're Dinesh D'Souza, Bill O'Reilly, or Glenn Beck:

You know, there's a new poll out that Muslims, the higher educated Muslims in the Middle East are more likely to be extremists? More and more Muslims now hate us all across the world, and it really has not a lot to do with anything other than our morals.

The things that they were saying about us were true. Our morals are just out the window. We're a society on the verge of moral collapse. And our promiscuity is off the charts.

Now I don't think that we should fly airplanes into buildings or behead people because of it, but that's the prevailing feeling of Muslims in the Middle East. And you know what? They're right.
Now I don't know to what poll he's referring, so I would caution that I've no idea whether he's even interpreting it correctly, lest I inadvertently pass on a possible fallacy about educated Muslims. I'll also mention with no small amount of bitter amusement that conservatives are as equally eager to embrace polls of Muslims with these sorts of findings as they are anxious to dismiss polls of Muslims that find, say, a majority of them want us the fuck out of Iraq.

But lest anyone mistakenly presume Beck's reference to our impending moral collapse has any relationship to a preemptive, unjustifiable war and all its ugly accoutrements, he makes sure to clarify he's speaking about our domestic moral foibles, like "promiscuity"—a single word meant to neatly encapsulate all the many sex, gender, and sexuality woes plaguing us, a word that draws a line straight from the genesis of women's lib through birth control, legal abortion, premarital sex, and casual sex, right on to sodomy and the Supreme Court, LGBT equality, and the catastrophic culmination of the hideous mess in same-sex marriage. That's why, according to Beck, Muslims hate us.

And he's right that hatred for America throughout the Muslim world has increased in the last six years, as has Islamic radicalism, as has the overall terrorist threat, but it isn't because Massachusetts is letting gays get hitched or because the FDA approved Plan B, irrespective of how Islam regards those issues. The National Intelligence Estimate, representing "a consensus view of the 16 disparate spy services inside government," attributes "the diffusion of jihad ideology" to our foreign policy, and very specifically the Iraq War—which certainly speaks to a corrupted morality, although not the one men like Beck would have us consider. Nonetheless, American troops stacking naked Iraqi detainees into a pyramid for laughs and snapshots is a bigger problem than American boys kissing. To rework a favorite phrase of the royal ringleader, they hate us not for our freedom, but for the freedoms we've so casually taken.

It's a reality Beck and his cohorts and their devotees will nevertheless continue to ignore, determined as they are to scapegoat cultural progressives as true targets of radical Islamic terrorism. Naturally, it's patent madness to think that if only America could get its uppity women and queers under control, Islamic terrorists would leave us alone, but having the courage and wherewithal to examine the genuine impetus of the increasing rage directed at us would require self-reflection and accountability. Instead, they exist inside a confounding ideological quandary in which they hate terrorists, but, as a result of blaming us for terrorists' attentions, they hate cultural progressives even more—and thusly want to control us, ultimately putting them on the same side as the radical fundamentalist Muslims to whom they like to claim we give support and comfort.

One is then left to wonder what Beck would do with all the uppity women and queers—whose off-the-charts promiscuity and daggum insistence on autonomy and equality are dragging America down into the soulless, depraved muck—since he's gracious enough not to endorse flying airplanes into buildings or beheading people. Legislating us into second-class citizenry is getting harder with the inevitable march of progress, so perhaps the next step is simply rounding us up to be dumped in some of those fancy Halliburton-built detention centers. After the deluge of email I received recently from angry conservatives for reasons well-known, I can attest that sending people like me to Gitmo is already not far from their minds.

They're so thoroughly losing the battle of ideas that the only arrow a cretin like Beck has left in his quiver is despicable crypto-eliminationist rhetoric. That sort of contemptible codswallop used to appeal only to those who haunt the darkest corners of America's ideological landscape, but thanks to the mainstreaming of such loathsome ideas by useful tools like Beck, coupled with the calamitous decision by the mainstream media to legitimize them, "I wouldn't kill liberals, but radical Muslims would, and they're right" now passes the muster of what we consider acceptable public discourse.

If there's evidence of America's moral decay to be found anywhere in all this, it's that we barely manage to bat an eye at such wicked hatemongering anymore.

Open Wide...

The Dems Make a Move

Enough is enough already:

Senate Democratic leaders intend to unveil a plan next week to repeal the 2002 resolution authorizing the war in Iraq in favor of narrower authority that restricts the military's role and begins withdrawals of combat troops.

House Democrats have pulled back from efforts to link additional funding for the war to strict troop-readiness standards after the proposal came under withering fire from Republicans and from their party's own moderates.

…The new framework would set a goal for withdrawing combat brigades by March 31, 2008, the same timetable established by the bipartisan Iraq Study Group. Once the combat phase ends, troops would be restricted to assisting Iraqis with training, border security and counterterrorism.

Senior Democratic aides said the proposed resolution would be sent directly to the Senate floor for action, without committee review, possibly as an amendment to a homeland security bill scheduled for debate next week.
I'm sure the idea of repealing the war resolution has something to do with the saber-rattling over Iran, because there have been fears that the administration will try to use the resolution to justify military action against Iran, by virtue of some vague wording in the resolution like "Whereas it is in the national security interests of the United States to restore international peace and security to the Persian Gulf region," and administration claims that Iran is meddling in Iraq (ergo making itself part of the existing war). So repealing the resolution is a good idea for more reasons than just hastening a withdrawal, although that's reason enough.

Creature also points out that "couching the language of this plan to parallel the Iraq Study Group is a smart move and will keep the American people firmly on the side of the Democrats as the debate moves forward." Absolutely. The ISG will give "the Democrat Party" some much-needed cover as the screeching about stab-in-the-backism inevitably begins.

Meanwhile, I've no idea what this new tactic means for Lieberman, who's been threatening to switch parties if the Dems embrace a defunding strategy. Also, I don't really care. I know the war is a ginormous issue, but if Lieberman—particularly after insisting he's a good Dem by pointing to his record on social and economic issues—is willing to switch over to the GOP because of this, they can bloody have him.

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime

The Wild Wild West

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Who's your favorite stand-up comedian?

There are a good few comedians who can make me laugh until tears pour from my eyes—all of whom will no doubt turn up in comments, so I won't start listing. And I really tried to narrow it down to just one, but I couldn't. So here are my top two:

Eddie Izzard on Religion



George Carlin on Language

Open Wide...

Conservapedia

For years homeschooled children have had to rely for all of their information on Wikipedia, which is full of dangerous ideas that homeschooling was supposed to prevent from seeping into the home. Now, finally, there is an alternative, which doesn't have any controversial ideas at all: Conservapedia. Conservapedia is based on good Christian values, unlike Wikipedia, which I gather from the name, is based on Wiccan. In Wikipedia, according to the founders of Conservapedia, "Christianity receives no credit for the great advances and discoveries it inspired, such as those of the Renaissance." But Conservapedia gives Christianity its due for being so supportive of the work of Galileo and Copernicus.

"The administrators who monitor and control the content on Wikipedia do not represent the views of the majority of Americans." reads Conservapedia's entry on Wikipedia (helpfully redirected from Wackypedia in case you mistype). "For example, only 10% of Americans accept evolution as it is taught in public school, yet virtually 100% of Wikipedia administrators accept it and will quickly censor factual material contrary to evolution." The biases in Wikipedia that Conservapedia corrects are all outlined in an article called "Examples of Bias in Wickipedia."

"Wikipedia allows the use of B.C.E. instead of B.C. and C.E. instead of A.D. The dates are based on the birth of Jesus, so why pretend otherwise? Conservapedia is Christian-friendly and exposes the CE deception" is the Number 1 Example of Wikipedia bias. Example 5 points out "Wikipedia often uses foreign spelling of words, even though most English speaking users are American." On Conservapedia less acceptable English spellings of English words are banned in favor of proper American spellings. "Gossip is pervasive on Wikipedia," reads Example 8. "Many entries read like the National Enquirer. For example, Wikipedia's entry on Nina Totenberg states, 'She married H. David Reines, a trauma physician, in 2000. On their honeymoon, he treated her for severe injuries after she was hit by a boat propeller while swimming.' That sounds just like the National Enquirer, and reflects a bias towards gossip. Conservapedia avoids gossip and vulgarity, just as a true encyclopedia does." In fact, one of the reasons I stopped reading the National Enquirer is because I was tired of all the stories about Nina Totenberg's affairs and her latest stints in rehab. Conservapedia doesn't even have an entry on Nina Totenberg, much to my relief.

Another example of Wikipedia bias that Conservapedia cites is its unfair attack on the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, which must be particularly upsetting to Conservapedia's founder. Started in November 2006 "as the class project for a World History class of 58 advanced homeschooled and college-bound students meeting in New Jersey" Conservapedia was founded by its most prolific writer Andrew Schlafly, the non-gay son of Phyllis Schlafly, who just happens to be the legal counsel for the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons. Schlafly is an outspoken critic of vaccines (which as someone who hates needles I fully support), has warned that abortion causes breast cancer, filed briefs on behalf of Terry Schiavo and revealed that junk science claiming a link between asbestos and cancer is what led to the World Trade Center's collapse.

I am astonished by all of the things I have learned already from Conservapedia. For example, I was unaware of something called the Law of Mass Conversation: "Matter cannot be created or destroyed, it can only change form." Now that I think about it, I have observed that often when you're in a conversation with a large group of people you sometimes think you have let a matter drop, but you end up rehashing the same topic over again in a different form. This happens a lot on the Internet, too. But I had no idea someone had written a law about it.

But that's just one of the many fascinating, unbiased facts I learned. After spending the day hitting the random search button I felt like a Renaissance man, the good Christian kind. Of course, since anyone can edit the Conservapedia, the entries are constantly changing, so the links go to the last version I saw. Feel free to register and add your own insights, although it would be difficult to improve on some of these entries:

Kangaroo: "Like all modern animals, modern kangaroos originated in the Middle East and are the descendants of the two founding members of the modern kangaroo baramin that were taken aboard Noah's Ark prior to the Great Flood." (I'm sure skippy will be very interested to learn this.)

Theory of Relativity: "Nothing useful has even been built based on the theory of relativity.…'All things are relative' became popular as atheists and others used relativity to attack Christian values. There remains enormous political support for the theory of relativity that has nothing to do with physics, and Congress continues to spend billions of dollars unsuccessfully searching for particles predicted by the theory of relativity."

Gospels: "The greatest writing in the history of the world is the Gospel of John....This single book has done more to shape human thought and behavior than any other work. Our uniquely American First Amendment right of free speech is based on ministers preaching of the 'Word' of God as described in the first few verses of the Gospel of John."

George Washington: "Washington is perhaps the person other than Jesus who declined enormous worldly power, in Washington's case by voluntarily stepping aside as the ruler of a prosperous nation."

Scopes Trial: "Hollywood has little regard for the truth. Its movie version Inherit the Wind changed everyone's name, thereby preventing libel suits, and changed the facts in order to ridicule religious belief. Thanks to Bryan's victory in the Scopes trial, Tennessee voters have been educated without oppressive evolution theory for 75 years. Free from the liberal indoctrination, Tennessee voted against native son Al Gore in the 2000 Presidential election - probably the only time a candidate has lost the Presidency due to losing his home state. If Tennessee had a high level of belief in evolution comparable to that of East Germany, then you can bet Gore would have won his state and the Presidency."

The Da Vinci Code: "Dan Brown is responsible for feeding millions of readers a pack of lies cleverly wrapped up as a historically accurate novel."

Holocaust: "The Holocaust was the massacring of the Jewish race during World War II. The Germans are not to blame for this but the Nazi are. Besides 6 million Jews dying, 3 million Christians were killed also along with many priests and nuns. This is a very touchy subject for the Jews and is not often discussed amongst them."

Communism: "Communists believe that if they share everything, no one will ever have to work."

Most of the articles in Conservapedia are scrupulously sourced. For example, the entry on Isaac Newton -- "Sir Isaac Newton was one of the inventors of calculus and the propsed [sic-whoops!] the theory of gravity (It should be noted that gravity, like evolution, is just a theory and has never been proven to be true). He was a Devout Christian whose discoveries were inspired by God." -- refers you to the Bible Code Digest, which proves that Newton was a devout Christian. Virtually all of the science entries cite books by Dr. Jay L. Wile, the respected author of homeschool textbooks.

Unlike Wikipedia, which is full of too much information that can easily confuse people, most of the entries in Conservapedia are refreshingly brief, giving us just the facts we need to know: "Sufi: Sulfism [sic]; the tradition of Islam containing the beliefs dedicated to Allah." Concise, accurate, to the point. Who said encyclopedic necessarily means "comprehensive," I mean, besides Webster's dictionary, with its well-known liberal bias.

But Conservapedia is not just a dry, factual compendium of articles. In addition to scholarly encyclopedia entries, the Conservapedia contains "Debate Topics" which pose a number of provocative questions: "Crusades... Good or Bad?" "Did Jefferson Copy the Declaration of Independence?" "Is it even possible to install democracy in a Muslim country?" and "Was it wrong for him to allow the attack in order to wake up the American public and motivate Americans to fight and win the war?" which refers to Franklin Roosevelt and Pearl Harbor. This last topic has led to quite a debate between some frequent contributors and Andrew Schlafly, who not only believes that Roosevelt knew about Pearl Harbor in advance, buts thinks it was a good thing he let it happen.

Unfortunately, Conservapedia doesn't have an entry yet for Franklin Roosevelt or for other minor Presidents like John Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson, Harry Truman or Theodore Roosevelt, although it does have very illuminating yet succinct entries for Millard Fillmore, Franklin Pierce and William Henry Harrison. But the encyclopedia is still growing and with your help its 3000 or so articles based on incontrovertible conservative facts will soon approach Wikipedia's 1.5 million entries filled with liberal lies. However, there is one disturbing lack that both encyclopedias share: Neither of them has an entry about my modest blog.

Crossposted at Jon Swift

Open Wide...

Caption This Photo



"Looks like baby's back on the menu, boys!"

Via Recon.

Open Wide...

Um, Yeah

Steve: "I have to admit, I'm a little surprised the Alishtari story isn't a bigger deal. If the DCCC had accepted money from an accused terrorist financier, and kept the money, it seems safe to assume it'd get quite a bit of attention." It certainly does seem safe to assume that.

More from RJ.

Open Wide...

The cover-up of a soldier's death?


Private First Class LaVena Johnson

Regular readers here are familiar with much of this story from an earlier post, but new developments compel a revisit. Thanks.


Once upon a time lived a young woman from a St. Louis suburb. She was an honor roll student, she played the violin, she donated blood and volunteered for American Heart Association walks. She elected to put off college for a while and joined the Army once out of school. At Fort Campbell, KY, she was assigned as a weapons supply manager to the 129th Corps Support Battalion.

She was LaVena Johnson, private first class, and she died near Balad, Iraq, on July 19, 2005, just eight days shy of her twentieth birthday. She was the first woman soldier from Missouri to die while serving in Iraq or Afghanistan.

The tragedy of her story begins there.

An Army representative initially told LaVena's father, Dr. John Johnson, that his daughter died of "died of self-inflicted, noncombat injuries," but initially added that it was not a suicide. The subsequent Army investigation reversed this finding and declared LaVena's death a suicide, a finding refuted by the soldier's family. In an article in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Dr. Johnson pointed to indications that his daughter had endured a physical struggle before she died - two loose front teeth, a "busted lip" that had to be reconstructed by the funeral home - suggesting that "someone might have punched her in the mouth."

A promise by the office of Representative William Lacy Clay to look into the matter produced nothing. The military said that the matter was closed.

Little more on LaVena's death was said until St. Louis CBS affiliate KMOV aired a story last night which disclosed troubling details not previously made public - details which belie the Army's assertion that the young Florissant native died by her own hand. The video of the report is available on the KMOV website.

Reporter Matt Sczesny spoke with LaVena's father and examined documents and photos sent by Army investigators. So far from supporting the claim that LaVena died from a self-inflicted gunshot wound, the documents provided elements of another scenario altogether:

  • Indications of physical abuse that went unremarked by the autopsy
  • The absence of psychological indicators of suicidal thoughts; indeed, testimony that LaVena was happy and healthy prior to her death
  • Indications, via residue tests, that LaVena may not even have handled the weapon that killed her
  • A blood trail outside the tent where Lavena's body was found
  • Indications that someone attenpted to set LaVena's body on fire

The Army has resisted calls by Dr. Johnson and by KMOV to reopen its investigation.

We have seen in other military deaths, most infamously that of Army Ranger and former professional football player Cpl. Pat Tillman, that the Army has engaged in an insulting game of deny and delay when it comes to uncovering embarrassing facts. Only when public and official attention is brought to bear on the matter - as happened, eventually and with great effort, with the case of Cpl. Tillman - do unpleasant truths come to light.

Astonishing as it seems, it takes that level of outrage to compel the Army to find the truth and tell it, to honor its own soldiers. No such groundswell has yet emerged in the case of LaVena; not enough voices have demanded that someone in the military, anyone, speak for her. At first glance, the contrast between the cases of Pat Tillman and LaVena Johnson seems vast, but at the core the situations are the same. In each case, the death of a young soldier in a dangerous place and time was not explained to the families they left behind, the families that gave them up so that they could serve us. An honest accounting of their passing is all the dead ask of us.

The mother of Pat Tillman put the matter in stark and honest terms:

"This is how they treat a family of a high-profile individual," she said. "How are they treating others?"

In the case of Private First Class Johnson, we know the answer.

Send a message to your Senator on the Senate Armed Services Committee:

Democrats
Carl Levin, Chairman (Michigan)
Claire McCaskill (Missouri)
Edward M. Kennedy (Massachusetts)
Robert C. Byrd (West Virginia)
Joseph I. Lieberman (Connecticut)
Jack Reed (Rhode Island)
Daniel K. Akaka (Hawaii)
Bill Nelson (Florida)
E. Benjamin Nelson (Nebraska)
Evan Bayh (Indiana)
Hillary Rodham Clinton (New York)
Mark L. Pryor (Arkansas)
Jim Webb (Virginia)

Republicans
John McCain, Ranking Member (Arizona)
John W. Warner (Virginia)
James M. Inhofe (Oklahoma)
Jeff Sessions (Alabama)
Susan M. Collins (Maine)
John Ensign (Nevada)
Saxby Chambliss (Georgia)
Lindsey O. Graham (South Carolina)
Elizabeth Dole (North Carolina)
John Cornyn (Texas)
John Thune (South Dakota)
Mel Martinez (Florida)

(Cross-posted in full at Waveflux and in part at AlterNet.)

Open Wide...

Cool

Hunting chimps may change view of human evolution:

Chimpanzees have been seen using spears to hunt bush babies


"Heh, look—I got me two of 'em!"

Okay, that's really not what we're talking about, George.

Anyway…

U.S. researchers said on Thursday [the study] demonstrates a whole new level of tool use and planning by our closest living relatives.

Perhaps even more intriguing, it was only the females who fashioned and used the wooden spears, Jill Pruetz and Paco Bertolani of Iowa State University reported.

Bertolani saw an adolescent female chimp use a spear to stab a bush baby as it slept in a tree hollow, pull it out and eat it.

…Chimps are known to use tools to crack open nuts and fish for termites. Some birds use tools, as do other animals such as gorillas, orangutans and even naked mole rats. But the sophisticated use of a tool to hunt with had never been seen.

Pruetz thought it was a fluke when Bertolani saw the adolescent female hunt and kill the bush baby, a tiny nocturnal primate. But then she saw almost the same thing. "I saw the behavior over the course of 19 days almost daily," she said.

The chimps choose a branch, strip it of leaves and twigs, trim it down to a stable size and then chew the ends to a point. Then they use it to stab into holes where bush babies might be sleeping.

…Pruetz noted that male chimps never used the spears. … "The observation that individuals hunting with tools include females and immature chimpanzees suggests that we should rethink traditional explanations for the evolution of such behavior in our own lineage," she concluded in her paper.
Does that mean I might have talent and purpose beyond birthin' babies after all?!

Someone give these female chimps a typewriter and see if they can't figure out how to write for a general audience about such topics as military history, too—because if they can, maybe we can rethink some other antiquated, dumbass notions about women, too.

Open Wide...

Illinois Next on the SSM Train?

Let's hope so (under "News"):

State Representative Greg Harris, D-Chicago, introduced a bill to recognize same-sex marriage February 22 in the Illinois House of Representatives.

"It is the right thing to do," Harris said.

Rep. Harris says the passage of the bill will not be "quick and easy" but he is working with Equality Illinois and other advocates to determine the best strategy for the measure.

"This will be an uphill and difficult battle," said Rick Garcia, Director of Public Policy for Equality Illinois. "But, we are grateful to Representative Harris for showing leadership on this issue and Equality Illinois is prepared to use all of our resources to make sure that gay couples in Illinois are legally recognized and protected."

"Believing in it isn’t enough," Harris said, emphasizing that constituents need to continuously contact their legislators if they want to make the concept of same-sex marriage a reality.
Good stuff. I actually think this has a pretty good chance of going somewhere, considering that, during the last election, the gubernatorial candidates from both parties are not just acceptably pro-gay rights, but are fixtures at Chicago's Gay Pride. There are a lot of red patches in Illinois (hence Denny Hastert, for a start), but overall the state is ultimately solidly blue (hence Dick Durbin and Barack Obama). It would be most splendid if Illinois could sort this out legislatively in a reasonably timely fashion. Go on, Land of Lincoln!

H/T to champion purveyor of the radical gay agenda Sarah in Chicago.

Open Wide...