Survivor: Race War!

When you've got a reality show that's awfully long in the tooth - thirteen "seasons" - and your previous season had the worst ratings in the history of the series, what do you do? You play the race card! Behold, Survivor: Cook Islands:

The new season of "Survivor" will be a race among races.

At the start of the reality show's 13th edition, "Survivor: Cook Islands," 20 contestants will be organized into four tribes divided along ethnic lines -- black, white, Hispanic and Asian, CBS announced Wednesday.

The tribes, as usual, will merge later in the season, which debuts September 14, the network said.

Series host Jeff Probst clearly has no shame. But he does have chutzpah*.

"It's not just 18 white people," Probst told the magazine. "Suddenly you have new slang, new rituals--people doing things like making fire in ways that haven't been done on Survivor. I think we have a season where people will say you can never go back to what you were before."

At long last, white America will learn the occult secret of how the little-understood Hispanics make fuego in their secretive barrios! We can hardly wait!

*A word from a culture strangely unrepresented on this brave new multi-culti Survivor.

(Cross-posted with a heavy sigh.)

Open Wide...

Family news from Missouri

Dateline: Independence. Moronic couple behind sextuplet scam pleads guilty, otherwise appears somewhat unrepentant:

A suburban Kansas City couple appeared in Jackson County Circuit Court on Wednesday and pleaded guilty to stealing by faking the birth of sextuplets to solicit money from friends and neighbors.

Sarah Everson, 45, and Kris Everson, 35, of Grain Valley, each pleaded guilty to one count of felony stealing by deceit. Judge Jeffrey Bushur sentenced them each to four years probation. They were also ordered to repay about $3,661.25 to their victims and perform 40 hours of community service.

Community leaders in Grain Valley said the Eversons came to them in March, saying they had delivered six critically ill babies and needed help. The couple claimed the births were being kept secret by a court order because a family member was out to kill them. [...]

The Eversons, who sat huddled together and were quiet in the courtroom, afterward walked hand-in-hand away from the courthouse as reporters and camera crews followed them down the street. Kris Everson said they would not comment on the plea agreement.

"We already made our apologies," Sarah Everson said, "so no comment."

Sarah Everson giggled as reporters finally broke up and left the couple alone.

Dateline: Black Jack. City council finally tires of being national laughingstock, decides it has no business trying to define what a family is:

Yielding to reason, and the threat of a lawsuit, the Black Jack city council Tuesday wisely decided to let unmarried couples raise their children within the city limits. The vote removed an antiquated piece of municipal moralizing from the housing code, where it never belonged.

Thus ends seven months of uncertainty for Fondray Loving, Olivia Shelltrack and their three children. The family moved into their five-bedroom house in January, but were denied an occupancy permit because the parents are not married.

Black Jack's 21-year-old occupancy ordinance ostensibly was designed to control crowding, boarding houses and fraternity houses. The marriage requirement survived a previous challenge in 1999, and city officials seemed dead set on enforcing it this year.

Ms. Shelltrack and Mr. Loving and their three children are a family, not a fraternity. To their credit, they stuck to their guns and refused to be run out of their home. Score one for liberty, democracy and common sense.

(Cross-posted.)

Open Wide...

Viacom Jumps Off the Crazy Tom Train

No thanks, Mr. Born on the Fourth of Lunacy:

Viacom Inc.'s Paramount Pictures unit is ending its 14-year relationship with Tom Cruise's film production company because of the actor's offscreen behavior, the company's chairman said in an interview with the Wall Street Journal.

Sumner Redstone, Viacom chairman, said the behavior of the star of the "Mission: Impossible" series and "Top Gun" was unacceptable to the company, according to the Wall Street Journal story e-mailed to reporters.

Cruise, one of Hollywood's biggest stars, has been known more recently for his antics on U.S. television talk shows, including jumping up and down on Oprah Winfrey's couch to declare his love for Katie Holmes and criticizing the use of antidepressant drugs.

"As much as we like him personally, we thought it was wrong to renew his deal," Redstone was quoted as saying in the Wall Street Journal. "His recent conduct has not been acceptable to Paramount."
“Please don’t sue us, you fucking nutcase,” he added.

Via Michael K at Dlisted, who comments, “I think that Paramount seriously knows of something fucked up coming up and decided to distance themselves from him before it hits the fan. Stay tuned for Tom to completely flip out!” I don’t think he’s far off the mark. Redstone’s continued success is contingent on having inside info, and he’s all about the cash (so much so that he’s personally progressive and donates to Dems but votes Republican because “I vote for Viacom. Viacom is my life, and I do believe that a Republican Administration is better for media companies than a Democratic one”), and with Tom Cruise still able to pull big box office even with the usual crazy routine, I find it hard to believe Redstone would ditch him just for “his conduct.”

My prediction: Baby Suri turns out to be a Japanese-built animatronic doll stuffed with thetans.

Open Wide...

Bush Visits New Orleans, Farts Around


Whoops... it's the one year anniversary of the Katrina tragedy. Spike Lee has a documentary out that's getting a lot of buzz. And Bush has all but ignored the Gulf Coast. What to do? Why, it's time for a pandering, insulting flyover, of course!

Bush: Katrina Recovery Will Take Time

(Of course, it might take less time if some work was being done, but whatever.)

WASHINGTON - President Bush cautioned against placing too much importance on the first anniversary of Hurricane Katrina's Gulf Coast strike, saying a long, sustained rebuilding effort is still needed.
Yeah, we wouldn't want to actually consider the implications of what happened and take a good, hard look at what's actually been done for the victims, would we? After all, isn't a date just a number?
"It's a time to remember that people suffered and it's a time to recommit ourselves to helping them," Bush said Wednesday. "But I also want people to remember that a one-year anniversary is just that, because it's going to require a long time to help these people rebuild."
Seriously, if anyone can tell me what the fuck he means with that sentence, please let me know.

A day earlier, the Bush administration's Gulf Coast coordinator, Don Powell, said $44 billion has been spent to get the still-battered region back on its feet. A far larger sum — more than $110 billion — has been designated for the massive rebuilding project. Of that money, approximately $17 billion will help rebuild an estimated 204,000 homes in Louisiana and Mississippi.
And every single penny has been put to good use.

What next? A situation like this that could cause the prez to look worse than usual calls for something special... something Rovian... of course! A photo op!
Bush spoke on the South Lawn of the White House after meeting in the Oval Office with a New Orleans-area man who lost his home in the storm. Rockey Vaccarella, 41, of Meraux in St. Bernard Parish, has been traveling the Gulf Coast region to mark the Katrina anniversary.
I'm going to assume that this man wouldn't be as critical as, say, Cindy Sheehan. Kudos to him for trying to talk some sense to Prezint Blinky McDistracted; as we all know, he's not an easy man to meet or talk to when he thinks you might not be on his side.
Released Wednesday by House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and her Senate counterpart, Harry Reid, D-Nev., the report asserted that "thousands of families are still waiting" for FEMA trailers and that a significant proportion of money that FEMA has spent there "has been waste, fraud and abuse."

"The Republican Congress didn't enact needed housing money for homeowners in Louisiana until June, 10 months after Katrina - and the money has still failed to reach these homeowners," it said.

For his part, Bush promised to continue working to make sure the federal government's efforts in the rebuilding effort are efficient.

"I told Rockey the first obligation of the federal government is to write a check big enough to help the people down there," Bush said. "And I told him that to the extent that there's still bureaucratic hurdles, and the need for the federal government to help eradicate those hurdles, we want to do that."
Ah, a big 'ol check. Brilliant. Kind of like just handing out $2000 debit cards. And Democrats are supposedly the ones that "throw money at problems?"
Bush is spending two days in the Gulf region next week to mark the anniversary. He will be in Mississippi on Monday, to have lunch with community leaders, walk through a neighborhood, and deliver a speech on the rebuilding effort, before traveling to New Orleans, where he was scheduled to have dinner with state and local official and spend the night. On Tuesday, Bush is attending a service of prayer and remembrance, conducting a roundtable discussion on an effort headed by first lady Laura Bush to restock Gulf Coast libraries. He also will give a speech and visit with local residents, Perino said.
A nice stroll through a neighborhood, dinner, and fixing up libraries. What a guy. You know what would impress me more? If he spent the night in one of those FEMA trailers. And filling the libraries with books is a nice idea and all, but what about the schools? Who's going to be visiting a library if they don't have somewhere to live? I hope they'll have some cots in the stacks.

Meanwhile, back at the reality ranch:
The job of clearing debris left by the storm remains unfinished, and has been plagued by accusations of fraud and price gouging. Tens of thousands of families still live in trailers or mobile homes, with no indication of when or how they will be able to obtain permanent housing. Important decisions about rebuilding and improving flood defenses have been delayed. And little if anything has been done to ensure the welfare of the poor in a rebuilt New Orleans.
Color me shocked. And what about paying attention to threats "before they fully materialize?"
LEVEES: The federal government hasn't broken any promises with regard to flood protection — mostly because it has assiduously avoided making any.

White House Katrina recovery czar Donald Powell has said that the administration intends to wait for the completion of a $20 million U.S. Army Corps of Engineers study, due in December 2007, before it decides whether to enhance the flood protection system in southern Louisiana enough to resist a Category 5 hurricane.

A preliminary draft of the study released in July was widely criticized because it omitted five projects that state officials say should be started right away. At the same time, it focused on a massive levee that would stretch hundreds of miles along the Louisiana coast while paying only lip service to the critical task of shoring up the state's vanishing wetlands, which provide a natural barrier to hurricane flooding.
Well, we can wait until the end of 2007. There probably won't be any hurricanes until then.

Shakes and I talked recently, and both of us were saying that we thought the Katrina tragedy would be the undoing for Bush. The gross incompetence, the horror that increased daily, the blatant disdain for the victims, and the complete ignoring of the situation should have been the tolling bell for the Bush Presidency. Somehow, he managed to survive.

Now, one year later, the disdain and ignoring continues. Bush would desperately love for Americans to consider the anniversary of this black eye to be unimportant; not a milestone, but a beginning. However, it only proves that the Bush Administration didn't give a good goddamn about the people on the Gulf Coast then, and one year later, they still have little concern for the welfare of the victims.

New Orleans is still drowning.

(I caution about placing too much importance on this cross-post.)

Open Wide...

Gender-Benders

Konagod’s written a couple of excellent posts working through his thoughts after reading this article about transgenderism and transsexualism in the NY Times. It struck me, as I read his second post this morning, that getting into issues of how one’s gender is expressed (as opposed to how one’s sex and sexuality are expressed) starts to explain why there are straight people who so closely identify with the queer community. Like me, for instance.

Recently, in the comments thread of this post—which mentioned that the latest Arabic linguist who’d been discharged from the military for being gay was asked, as part of the investigation, whether he belonged to community theater—Paul the Spud, Sarah in Chicago, and I set to coming up with other questions they might have asked.

Paul the Spud: Geez. Did they ask him if he owned any Madonna albums? Knew how to cook a quiche? Knew who hosted the Tony Awards last year?

Shakes: Do you currently own, or have you ever, a copy of Mommie Dearest? Do you know the lyrics to "It's Raining Men"? Have you ever read Shakespeare's Sister?

Paul the Spud: Are you now, or have you ever been, a member of the Judy Garland fan club? Do you have a subscription to "Men's Fitness" just for the pictures? Can you quote more than three lines of dialogue from Valley of the Dolls?

Sarah in Chicago: What is the appropriate placement for a throw-rug? What is the best facial lotion base for combination skin types? Who had the biggest impact, Joan Collins or Greta Garbo? What colour ruffles was Dorothy wearing when she got to Oz?

Shakes: Did you like Beaches?

Sarah in Chicago: Hell, do you like Bette Midler?

I then said: “For the record, here are my answers to the questions: Do you own any Madonna albums? Yes. Do you know how to cook a quiche? Yes (but eww, eggs). Do I know who hosted the Tonys last year? Yes. Do you currently own, or have you ever, a copy of Mommie Dearest? Yes. Do you know the lyrics to "It's Raining Men"? Yes. Have you ever read Shakespeare's Sister? Yes. Are you now, or have you ever been, a member of the Judy Garland fan club? No, but I had a Judy Garland doll! Do you have a subscription to "Men's Fitness" just for the pictures? No. Can you quote more than three lines of dialogue from Valley of the Dolls? Oh yes. What is the appropriate placement for a throw-rug? Right over there. What is the best facial lotion base for combination skin types? Shiseido. Who had the biggest impact, Joan Collins or Greta Garbo? Trick question. It was Joan Crawford. What colour ruffles was Dorothy wearing when she got to Oz? Blue and white. Did you like Beaches? Yes. Do you like Better Midler? Yes. I'm clearly a very homosexual gay man.”

To which Sarah replied: “Trick question. It was Joan Crawford.—OMG!!! I thought NO ONE would get that! *boggles* Okay, you're not just an honorary queer, you're obviously a flaming gay man.”

This was no surprise to me. I’ve been told I’m a gay man trapped in a woman’s body since I was about 16.

And, before that, I was routinely called a lesbian by my classmates. Now I’m just called a “lebisan” by spelling-challenged emailers who can’t understand why a straight woman would blog about LGBT rights.

The thing is, I’m not a lesbian and I’m not really a man trapped in a woman’s body. My sexuality and my mind-body agreement on my sex (biological womanhood) are “normal.” But then there’s my gender—the social and cultural expressions of my sex—and that’s where I get a little, well, queer.

When my girlfriends were begging their mothers to wear make-up, I couldn’t have cared less, and still don’t. I often dress “like a boy.” I never felt comfortable with the straight dating scene and all its accoutrements—singles bars, nightclubs, bouquets, etiquette, and rules. I don’t long for “Girls’ Night Out.” I’ve never had a manicure. I didn’t want a wedding with a white dress. I don’t want to be a mother. In everything from my regarding fashion magazines with the same detached fascination as I would an article on an aboriginal tribe in National Geographic to my oft-described “male” sense of humor, emotionality, and pop culture preferences, I have turned out very unlike the girlfriends of my youth.

I don’t hold in contempt any of those things, nor do I consciously reject them; I don’t find them inherently incompatible with feminist ideals—I firmly believe there are straight and gay women who enjoy looking and feeling very feminine for themselves. The intrinsic understanding of these things (or desire for them) just isn’t in me. And that leaves me bucking the conventional gender expressions of my sex.

What I am is a gender-bender, but unlike David Bowie playing with feminine flourishes, my contortions of gender happen mostly internally, manifesting less in what I look like and more in what I think, and how I think about things—my mind doesn’t have a problem fitting with my body as with gender dysphoria, but it sometimes has a problem fitting with other straight women, who, comfortable in their “normal” gender expression, look at me curiously. Or suspiciously, as if I’m just putting on some kind of bullshit act, especially when their straight boyfriends or husbands comment that I’m “cool” (a strange little twist of sexism indicating preference for a boyish personality in women, of which I’ve often been an unfortunate beneficiary).

There are other women like me, and straight men, too, who have never felt comfortable with the expectations for their expression of gender, largely centered around aggression (sports fandom, objectification of women, hostility toward gays) and, increasingly, a disdain for intellectualism. Because traditional gender roles are still so dominant, many of us end up feeling more comfortable among the queer community, where atypical gender expressions are hardly a big deal—and being ridiculed for modified expressions of gender are often the first indication of potential membership. (I’m reminded of David Sedaris’ essay on being sent to speech therapy as a child for his feminine lisp and, noting the other kids who shared his fate, suggesting that the therapist’s office should have been labeled “Future Homosexuals of America.”) Before sexuality manifests itself, it is divergence from expected gender expression that piques the hand-wringing of concerned parents—and the ire of antagonistic peers. And the potential ostracization by staunch gender traditionalists in adulthood isn’t predicated on one’s sexuality. Being a straight girl whose gender expressions are “weird” may save me from unfair legislative attack on my ability to marry and parent, but I’m still regarded as a deviant by the same assholes.

And even straight people who aren’t homophobic or strict traditionalists often don’t “get” it. My LGBT friends have never looked at me askance because I’ve done something “mannish.” They’ve never asked Mr. Shakes and me when we’re going to have a baby (with the presumption that, certainly, we are—it’s just a matter of when). They’ve never suggested I should be more feminine, that I’d be so much prettier if only I’d just…

We don’t get along in spite of our differences, but because of what we have in common. We’re all, somehow, out of the “norm” on the spectrum, in one way or another. So we hang, even though there isn’t really a name for someone like me, not in the sense of a label like gay or transgendered. Misfit, maybe. Tomboy. A friend once dubbed me queer-brained, and that sounds about right.

Open Wide...

Son o’ God Gram

Jesus has made his zaniest appearance yet—in a womb!

After seven months of a difficult pregnancy, Laura Turner looked anxiously at the latest ultrasound picture of her unborn son.

She was reassured to see not just the baby sucking his thumb - but what she believes is an image of Jesus watching over him.

The hat tip goes to BlondeSense Liz, who suggests maybe it’s John Lennon.

Holy folks Gone Wild on chocolate, dying plants, sheet metal, trees, more trees, wardrobes, water stains, grilled cheese sandwiches, potato chips, plates of pasta, drywall, fish, and more fish.

Open Wide...

I Promise No "Pet Goat" Jokes

Are you ready for this? I don't think you're ready for this. Put the coffee down.

A Humbled Presidency: Bush Tries a More Thoughtful Approach

Maybe it was the influence of his wife, Laura, a former librarian, or his mother, Barbara, a longtime promoter of literacy. Or perhaps he was just eager to dispel his image as an intellectual lightweight. But President Bush now wants it known that he is a man of letters.
A man of letters? Heh.... heh, heh. You mean, these?

In fact, Bush has entered a book-reading competition with Karl Rove, his political adviser. White House aides say the president has read 60 books so far this year (while the brainy Rove, to Bush's competitive delight, has racked up only 50).
HAHAHA! No, seriously, pull the other one.

Bush's critics aren't buying. A man who so regularly mangles the English language and seems to disdain complexity couldn't possibly be so cerebral, they argue. But portraying Bush as a voracious reader is part of an ongoing White House campaign to restore what a senior adviser calls "gravitas" to the Bush persona. He certainly needs something. Only about 34 percent of Americans approve of his job performance-and 58 percent say Bush "seems in over his head," according to Democratic pollster Stan Greenberg. If nothing changes, the president could be a major liability for Republicans in November's congressional elections.

[...]

Changing these perceptions won't be easy. "A president's image is pretty much set after a few years in office, and it will be very difficult [for Bush] to quickly reverse that image with the public," says political historian Julian Zelizer of Boston University. "It's a cynical age and a cynical country, and it's a savvy public." But the White House is giving it a try. Last week provided a glimpse of Bush's new "gravitas campaign"-and illustrated why his presidency has been humbled-if not in spirit, then in Bush's grudging acknowledgment of his current limitations.
Ain't gonna happen, folks. The "Bush Image" has been carefully crafted and spoonfed to the public by Rove (who couldn't possibly be letting Bush win their little "competition," by the way); they have been hammering it into the head of America for years that Bush isn't one o' them effete, intellectual, pansy readers. It's common knowledge that Bush doesn't bother reading at work; he has briefs read to him by staff members. He's stated time and again that he doesn't read newspapers. His anti-intellectualism and resistance to learning is all too obvious. The man can't be bothered. I find it quite amusing that this story all but explicitly states, "This is all bullshit and nothing but an image makeover that they're hoping you'll fall for." I also love how junior-high all of this is... he can only be coaxed into reading by making it into a competition. Does he get a new bike if he wins?

Here's a partial list that Bush is supposedly reading. "Hamlet" and "Macbeth?" Right. No, really, pull the other one.

Steve at The Carpetbagger Report does some number crunching, and confidently states that there is no way in hell that Bush could have possibly read all of those books in the time stated. "A" for effort, Steve, but I could have told you that and saved you a lot of work. High School students have to be more or less forced to read Shakespeare; don't tell me for a second that Bush, Mister Fart Joke himself, could manage to make his way through two Shakespeare plays. Add "Cliffs Notes" after those titles, and maybe I'll believe it.

Bush has spent his entire "presidency" displaying his contempt for the written word. Don't give me this "sudden change of heart" bullshit. Instead of trying to up his poll numbers with this transparent lie, perhaps he should start fixing the messes he's created that are causing his miserable popularity polls in the first place.

Ass.

UPDATE: Steve has another take on the propaganda. It's Saddam all over again!

(Tip 'o the Energy Dome to Crooks & Liars. Oh-oh-oh-oh... little cross-post girl...)

Open Wide...

Burns Loves the Legal Immigrants

Not Monty Burns, Senator Conrad Burns—although if you can identify a discernible difference between the two of them, bully for you.

The Senator Burns was caught on tape referring to his house painter as “a nice little Guatemalan man” and suggesting that he might be in America illegally.

"The other day, the little fella who does our maintenance work around the house, he's from Guatemala, and I said, 'Could I see your green card?'" Burns said at a June meeting recorded by Democrats. "And Hugo says, 'No.' I said, 'Oh gosh.'"
Hugo, of course, is here legally. Burns’ spokesman asserts that Burns was just “telling an anecdotal story about a time he took the extra step to make sure a worker was legal.” Then, last week:

Burns is seen interrupting his own stump speech at a campaign event to take a cell phone call and then appears to speak to the painter.

"Hugo is a nice little Guatemalan man who is doing some painting for me ... in Virginia," Burns told the audience, to laughter, after hanging up on the call. "No, he's terrific, love him."
What is the point of all this? I’ll be damned if I can figure out why he would interrupt his speech to talk to his painter, only to then refer to his ethnicity in a way befitting a southern white granny, prompting laughter from his idiot supporters, and wind up going on about how great the guy is—two months after questioning the guy’s legal status to work in the US. It’s just…bizarre. It’s like he was worried his adorable little anecdote about demanding to see Hugo’s green card might come back to haunt him (especially after fellow GOP Senator Allen’s macaca outburst), so he tried to prove that he really likes the “nice little Guatemalan man” by taking a call from him during his speech. I don’t know. Racists are utterly perplexing. I guess it kind of reminds me of those earnest white people who have a special sort of “extra-nice” demeanor they save for people of color, which is really a mix of nervous laughter, anxiety, and condescension, because no matter how much they try, they can’t see past color—and in trying to prove they’re not racists, they come off like total boobs.

In any case, it’s a step up from when Burns had to apologize for referring to Arabs as “rag heads” a few years ago during a speech.

Open Wide...

Two-Minute Nostalgia Sublime

The Love Boat

Open Wide...

Probably of Interest to No One but Me


But I'll post it anyway.

Chicago Polka King Dies

Chicago native Walter E. Jagiello, who recorded 110 albums as "Lil' Wally the Polka King," and who gained fame as the co-writer of the Chicago White Sox fight song, has died. He was 76.

Jagiello was a drummer and singer largely credited with creating the Chicago-style polka, characterized by a slower, more deliberate beat. He was the first musician inducted into the Polka Hall of Fame in Chicago.

He died of heart failure Thursday in Miami Beach, Fla.

"Wally was one of the great 20th Century American musicians," said Don Hedeker of the polka band the Polkaholics. "He was on par with Johnny Cash in country and Charlie Parker in jazz."

Jagiello's reign as the polka king centered on a strip of Chicago's Division Street known during the 1940s and 1950s as "Polish Broadway." At its peak, the North Side neighborhood had 50 polka clubs.

Jagiello charted in Billboard with two hits, "Polish Polka Twist" and "I Wish I Was Single Again." He sang fluently in both Polish and English. He also appeared on the Lawrence Welk Show several times.

In 1959, he co-wrote "Let's Go Go Go White Sox," the team's fight song. It was recorded by Captain Stubby and the Buccaneers with the Lil' Wally Orchestra and began to be used again last year.
This really is a shame. Chicago is still one of the big polka cities, and this definitely is a blow to the music and culture. I got to see the Lil' Wally Orchestra once at Germanfest, and I'm really glad I did. So raise your stein and toast the Polka King. Rest in peace, Lil' Wally.

If you're interested in hearing some more "modern" kick-ass polkas, I suggest these bands:

Brave Combo- The reigning kings of modern polka. They play traditional polkas, and more modern stuff, such as "The Jimi Hendrix Purple Haze Polka." They also do tons of other world music styles and tex-mex... if you're into different sounds, their CDs should be in your collection.

The Polkaholics- Chicago's very own mix of The Ramones and polka. They'll get your butt shaking but good.

Polkacide- "San Francisco's One and Only Hardcore Polka Band." The name says it all... I love these guys!

Those Darn Accordions!- Mixing rock and polka, these guys are incredible. I saw them live in NYC, and they blew my ass through the back wall! You've got to hear their version of the Laverne & Shirley theme, "Making our Dreams Come True."

Big Lou, the Accordion Princess- Lovely and talented, I absolutely adore Big Lou! Her latest album, "Dogs Playing Polka," is well worth a purchase.

The Squeegees- All the girls want the man... who can play the accordion!

There's a good start. Now get some beer, hit the dance floor, and dance your butt off. You could use the stress relief, couldn't you?

By the way, if you're one of those people that sneers at polkas, and makes accordion jokes, the next Big Bore Bus out of Good Times City is here... be on it! Because you, my friend, are no fun.

(Cabbage rolls and cross-posts! Mmm, mmm, good!)

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Suggested by Fritz: "The staff at Salon.com listed six TV shows that they feel should be cancelled ASAP. The question is: What other shows should have made the list?"

(The shows suggested by Salon for cancellation were: 24, The O.C., Nancy Grace, The L Word, The Closer, Larry King.)

I watched about 10 minutes of Survivor once and thought it was heinously bad, yet another (the nine millionth or something?) season is about to begin (amid controversy). I don't watch enough TV (and what I do is, as you know, usually either some geeky shit or total crap like American Idol), so I can't really think of anything else to nominate.

My friend Sam swears My Name is Earl is hilarious, but I thought it stunk. I'm not sure that's down to the show actually sucking, though, as much as my own inability to get past the fact that Jason Lee named his firstborn Pilot Inspektor, and my sneaking suspicion that it's only funny if you don't live in an area where everyone looks and acts exactly like Earl and the gang.

Open Wide...

And Just To Give a Little Perspective...

...of exactly how far the bigotry shown in the post below can spread, here's a little story from Paul the Spud's neighborhood. I was so shocked when this happened, I had to call Shakespeare's Sister and tell her about it.

I was walking my dog after work in my Andersonville neighborhood. For those of you not familiar with Chicago, it's a far north side neighborhood; one of the bluest in a very blue city in a blue state. Extremely gay friendly (only the Boystown area is "more gay,"), very liberal, etc, etc. We also have a very high Latino population.

So, I'm crossing the street, and walking towards me is a Latino family; a mother, older daughter, and two very young children, one in a stroller. As we cross paths, a car passes us, going in the direction that I'm walking. The driver leans out of his window and sneers, "I see the illegal immigrants are all out today."

Yep.

There's no way he could have known if they were immigrants, or born in this country. There's no way he could have known if this family was here illegally, or if they were legal American citizens. They looked Mexican, and that was good enough for him. I figure he also felt pretty safe spewing this garbage at this family, as they didn't have any men walking with them that may have beaten his racist ass into the ground.

I should stress that this did not take place on one of the days when a large immigration rally was held in Chicago, which may have caused hightened tensions and emotions. (Not that heightened tensions and emotions would excuse this behavior.) It was just out of the blue. In a very blue neighborhood, in a very blue city, in a very blue state.

This shit is everywhere, and it's spreading.

(From my heart and from my hands, why don't people understand my cross-posts?)

Open Wide...

Round and Round We Go

Scotland’s national government has launched a campaign against rounds:

[T]he round is under threat from Scottish lawmakers who believe the custom feeds into Scotland's notorious alcohol problems by creating enormous social pressure on pub-goers to take their turn buying drinks.

…From the most glamorous bars to seedy spit-and-sawdust pubs, drinking alcohol is a Scottish pastime that ranks in importance alongside soccer, history, politics and meat pies.
And slagging ooff the English, mate!

The campaign includes telly adverts, movie theater adverts, billboards, etc. designed to undermine the tradition, which is being blamed for Scotland’s “notorious alcohol problems” and the fastest growing number of alcohol-related deaths in Europe.


Now, mind you, there’s undoubtedly some sense behind starting a discussion about Scotland’s drinking culture, considering the numbers on alcohol-related disease, but the focus on rounds specifically is a bit bizarre. Rounds are a huge part of drinking with Scots (even more so than with the English, in my experience), but in and of themselves, they’re not really the issue. The general drinking culture is surely a bigger factor. Of course, Scotland’s economy is built around that culture, so, in the end, picking on rounds is really a half-hearted attempt to address the problem without really addressing the problem. And the stoic Scots, of course, will regard it as the useless poppycock that it is and buy another round.

Nonetheless, kudos to whomever was feeding the AP their info for this story for trying to turn rounds into nothing short of a clandestine ritual in a nefarious ancient cult:

The ritual of the round ranks among the worlds most hazardous etiquette exchanges and can be as fraught as a first business meeting in Japan or courting Sicilian style.

Each round must be honored and reciprocated as a symbol of bonhomie, generosity and swagger.

The rules are simple:

— If you accept a drink you must also buy a round. (But if you are celebrating your birthday, or a new baby, you are exempted.)
Tell me again how if it’s your birthday, you don’t have to buy a round. These rules are so…mysterious.

— Each offer of a round must be accepted and reciprocated with drinks of equal value. Never offer a beer to someone who has just bought a bottle of champagne.

— If you have had enough to drink, you can quit, but you must make sure you have honored the round by buying everyone a drink.
Which people do all the time, proving how idiotic this campaign is, but whatever. Continue with the elaborate rounds rules, before I lose track of their perplexing intricacy.

— Not to buy a round is a great insult and round dodgers gain reputations as mean and untrustworthy. They usually are not invited out again.
Actually, I believe having one mate who always manages to be in “the bog” when it’s his turn to buy a round is as time-honored a tradition as rounds themselves. He doesn't get disinvited, or there'd be no one to loudly and drunkenly harass for being a wanker.

In mere weeks, Mr. Shakes' best mate MWS and his girlfriend will arrive for a stay, two of the loveliest people you could ever hope to have as houseguests. We’ll go out on the beers, as they say in Scotland, and I’ll be the designated driver, as I always am, since I’m not much of a drinker. And I’ll buy my round with pleasure.

Open Wide...

A Uniter, Not a Divider

Spend years sowing the seeds of racial hatred, bigotry and fear, and this is what you get.

A peaceful demonstration yesterday in Riverside against a law punishing those who hire or rent to illegal immigrants was met by a larger, slur-spewing crowd that tried to drown out the protesting speakers from the other side of a police barricade.

[...]

After an hour of prayers and speeches, Rivera and the protesters headed up Scott Street, the Burlington County town's main drag, as hundreds on both sides of the street cursed, spit and shouted at them to leave and never come back.

Some in the crowd were intoxicated. Some waved Confederate flags, while others thrust their right arms up to resemble a Nazi salute. Dozens had signs calling for tighter border control.

As the protesters walked along the center line, police kept the opposing crowd on the sidewalks. When the march ended and the two groups were allowed to mingle, the verbal attacks continued.

Some claimed illegal immigrants took jobs away from citizens. Some said they were angry because some illegal immigrants pay no income taxes. For others, the matter seemed personal.

"You spread germs," screamed Mary Goff, 32, a lifelong township resident. "You're ignorant, disgusting and lazy. Go somewhere else and give us back our town."


Pleasant, no? If that isn't enough to make you grit your teeth with rage and shame, take a look at the photo slideshow. Gotta love those confederate flags that always seem to pop up.

(Tip of the energy dome to Tbogg and the Poorman. Why do cross-posts like bad boys?)

Open Wide...

Conservatives invade your hotel room

Bet you thought you were all alone in your hotel room at the end of a long, tiring business day. Just you, a bottle of Cutty Sark, and Debbie Does Dallas: The Revenge. But you're not alone; you've got the Family Research Council, Concerned Women for America, and eleven other busybody conservative groups for company, crowding your bed, breathing hard, taking copious notes. And they want to take your hotel porn away:

A coalition of 13 conservative groups -- including the Family Research Council and Concerned Women for America -- took out full-page ads in some editions of USA Today earlier this month urging the Justice Department and FBI to investigate whether some of the pay-per-view movies widely available in hotels violate federal and state obscenity laws.

There's not a chance that the hotel industry will take this lying down, as it were. You can criticize housekeeping standards all you want, but don't mess with their revenue streams.

Precise statistics on in-room adult entertainment are hard to come by. By some estimates, adult movies are available in roughly 40 percent of the nation's hotels, representing more than 1.5 million rooms. Industry analysts suggest that these adult offerings generate 60 to 80 percent of total in-room entertainment revenue -- several hundred million dollars a year.

It's laughable that these conservatives claim to be protecting families; honestly, when was the last time that your mom and dad gave you the green light for hot and cold running porn while staying at the suburban hotelera? The simple fact is that these folks just don't like sex. And they really don't like you thinking about sex. H. L. Mencken had these puritans dead to rights many years ago: they are motivated solely by the haunting fear that someone, somewhere, may be happy.

(Cross-posted.)

Open Wide...

Fishy

And by fishy, of course I mean this fishy:

Like a gap in the fossil record, evolutionary biology is missing from a list of majors that the U.S. Department of Education has deemed eligible for a new federal grant program designed to reward students majoring in engineering, mathematics, science, or certain foreign languages.

That absence apparently indicates that students in the evolutionary sciences do not qualify for the grants, and some observers are wondering whether the omission was deliberate.

…The awards in question -- known as Smart Grants, for the National Science and Mathematics Access to Retain Talent program -- were created by Congress this year, with strong support from the president. The grants are worth up to $4,000 and are awarded in addition to Pell grants.

…Barmak Nassirian, an associate executive director of the American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers, also wrote to the department about the omission.

In an interview on Monday, Mr. Nassirian said the absence of evolutionary biology was disconcerting. "I'm hoping it's inadvertent and unintentional."
I’m sure that’s it. And I’m also sure that the Department of Education will promptly rectify this inadvertent and unintentional omission, lest one be left with the impression that our government is hostile to science.

Ahem.

Open Wide...

Just when you think you're out, they pull you back in

Tell this to the Marines: Ready or not, like it or not, thousands of them are now subject to recall:

The U.S. Marine Corps said Tuesday it has been authorized to recall thousands of Marines to active duty, primarily because of a shortage of volunteers for duty in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Up to 2,500 Marines will be brought back at any one time, but there is no cap on the total number of Marines who may be forced back into service in the coming years as the military battles the war on terror. The call-ups will begin in the next several months. [...]

The call-up affects Marines in the Individual Ready Reserve, a segment of the reserves that consists mainly of those who left active duty but still have time remaining on their eight-year military obligation.

Something Marine familes can look forward to as they head towards the holidays. Thank you, Mr. President.

More: Looking back over the article, I wonder if you can in fact call these call-ups "involuntary" if the terms of being in the Ready Reserve - with time remaining on your military obligation - stipulate that you can in fact be recalled at any time? Perhaps it's just a matter of semantics...and if you're home with your family and learn that you're now scheduled for a flight back to Camp Gannon or wherever, it might well feel involuntary. Still...

(Cross-posted.)

Open Wide...

Happy Blogiversary...

...to Drum!

Four years. Wow.

Open Wide...

Idiots

WSJ Washington Wire:

Latest Republican Campaign Issue?

A congressional candidate in Florida has become the third Republican office-seeker to call for heightened screening of Muslim airline passengers since the foiling of an airline bombing plot in Britain. “It is a fact that over the past 34 years, starting with the Munich Olympics, the majority of terrorist attacks have been carried out by Muslims,” said Mark Flanagan, a candidate in the 13th District of Florida, in a statement released this morning.
No matter that the more important statistic is that the majority of Muslims haven’t carried out terrorist attacks.

Flanagan said he was the only congressional candidate calling for profiling of Muslim passengers. But Paul Nelson, a Republican running in the third district of Wisconsin, endorsed the idea last week on a local radio show. Asked on the show how screeners would spot a Muslim male, Nelson said, “If he comes in wearing a turban and his name is Muhammad, that’s a good start,” according to the Associated Press.
How delightful. It must be really fun to be an American Sikh right now, btw.

New York gubernatorial candidate John Faso also has supported profiling, saying, “If a 25-year-old Muslim man who has been traveling frequently to Yemen or Pakistan tries to board a plane, then not only statistical analysis but also common sense tells us that he is more of a potential threat than the grandmother from Queens.”
Here’s why profiling is unnecessary: Because anyone who travels frequently between the US and another country is already given additional scrutiny. When Mr. Shakes was starting to pile up the US stamps in his passport, he got more guff from customs about why he was here and how long his visit would be and where he was staying, etc. It isn’t contingent upon one’s name, ethnicity, outfit, or home country, and it doesn’t have to be. Customs can do its job well without profiling—and, let’s remember, that it was the failing of immigration to keep tabs on people here legally that left members of the 9/11 gang here when they shouldn’t have been. Anyone who’s dealt with the former INS/current DHS on immigration issues can tell you what a total mess that operation is. Clean that up and no one will have to worry so much about identifying threats at airports.

Open Wide...

Caption This Photo


Winner of the Image Most Likely to Compel Shakespeare's
Sister to Punch Her Monitor Contest.


(Don't yell at me; blame Rox for this one.)

Open Wide...