O’Reilly Cries for Rush

Such an outpouring of sympathy touches the cockles of my hardened heart:

Fox News host Bill O'Reilly is coming to the defense of his radio competitor Rush Limbaugh, claiming authorities in Palm Beach County, Fla., are "out to get" the conservative talk-show host, and are maliciously targeting him for prosecution.

"He is an American," O'Reilly said of Limbaugh last night on "The O'Reilly Factor," "and I believe powerful people in his home county are trying unjustly to harm him."
He then dabbed at his alligator tears with a monogrammed hankie and reminded al-Qaida they should blow up San Francisco.

O'Reilly noted it was unusual authorities checked the shaving kits of people flying on private planes...
Really? That’s interesting. See, I’m one of the dirty-faced rabble who have to fly on commercial airliners, and everything down to my manicure kit gets checked, so I only assumed that people who were flying in from outside the country, even on private planes, would be subject to the same rules. But hey—my mistake. I forgot that being rich meant you couldn’t possibly be a terrorist.

Or does that rule only apply to rich white guys?

I mean, I kind of dig the logic. Why would bellicose, bloviating fucks like O'Reilly or Limbaugh want to do anything to destroy perhaps the only country in the world where their insolent, antipathetic, avaricious asses could make millions of dollars disgorging bucketfuls of mindless mendacity day after day? Smart guys like that don't rip up their meal tickets. Nonetheless, I still find it curious that it's "unusual" for the belongings of "people flying on private planes" to be checked by authorities—and rather ironic that anyone who's made a bloody mint shilling for an administration who would strip us of every last shred of privacy would moan about being subjected to the same security measures as the rest of us.

Open Wide...

Caption This Photo

Open Wide...

The Air Conditioning Conundrum

Fascinating piece by Brad Plumer:

So would Americans have to use a good deal less A/C and learn to suffer through the heat if we wanted to convert to renewable energy, lower our carbon emissions, and have any hope of staving off global warming? Cox thinks so…

Another problem is that a large part of our economy likely depends quite heavily on air conditioning, especially in warmer parts of the country. … And without air conditioning, worker productivity would plummet during the hotter months (long summer vacations, of course, are out of the question—that's crazy socialist talk). Fun little dilemma we have here...
This is something I haven’t much considered before, aside from our personal use of air conditioning. We try to use it as little as possible. In Chicagoland summers, that’s not easy, but we try to make do as often as humanly possible with open windows, box fans, and ceiling fans. I regularly suffer with heat edema, prickly heat, and severe water retention in high temperatures, but I really try to forego the A/C as much as I can. I find, though, that when we have guests over in the summer, they have a much lower tolerance for it than we do the later it gets in the season, so we usually have to put on the air.

Check out Brad’s post at least, if not also the two-piece article at AlterNet by Stan Cox to which he’s responding. I’d be interested to hear some thoughts on this issue.

Open Wide...

I Amy Sedaris

Great interview with Amy Sedaris in The Onion:

The A.V. Club: Would you ever play a pretty character?

Amy Sedaris: If she was ugly and, like, made to be pretty. Like if you got up close and could see pockmarks. It's just more fun for me to play more character-driven things. Like, if it was a pretty girl, then I would find some way to make her ugly. [Laughs.] Because that's just more interesting to me.
You can read the whole thing here. Hat tip to Matt at After School Snack.

Open Wide...

What’s that cool breeze I feel?

Something’s definitely in the air:

An odd thing seems to have happened to mighty right-wing talking head media juggernaut. They are still talking, but fewer people seem to be listening — at least on the Internet.

Alexa.com, which is owned and operated by Amazon.com, tracks online usage for all Web sites, large and small. … At U.S. Politics Today, we thought it might be interesting to see how the right-wing media machine was doing. Not well, it turns out.
What did they find out? During the last three months, AnnCoulter.com is down 10%. Fox News down 13%. RushLimbaugh.com down 18%. The Drudge Report down 21%. Townhall.com down 24%. Washington Times’ website down 27%. And BillOreilly.com down 40%.

Could it be that Internet users are getting tired of political sites in general? Maybe so. But http://moveon.org is up 13 percent in the same period.
Delicious! thought I. But I’ve always got to do my own research. So I headed over to make sure there was no cherry-picking going on. What did I find?

Focus on the Family down 18%. Free Republic down 19%. Hugh Hewitt down 21%. World Net Daily down 23%. Michelle Malkin down 30%. The Weekly Standard down 37%. Pajamas Media down 39%.

Raw Story up 6%. Center for American Progress up 12%. Crooks and Liars up 17%. Think Progress up 41%.

I’ve no doubt I’ve forgotten some notable examples that might be exceptions to this trend (although I will assure you I did not find a single right-wing blog whose traffic went up that I deliberately left out), and regular old blogs all seem to be down a bit. Eschaton is down 16%. Daily Kos is down 10%. Shakes is down 8%. But even there, the right-wing blogs look to be doing worse. Little Green Footballs down 19%. Volokh Conspiracy down 28%. Powerline down 33%.

Maybe it doesn’t mean anything. But maybe it does.

Related: Keith Olbermann rips O'Reilly a new asshole over their respective TV ratings.

Open Wide...

Message to liberals, lefties, progressives, what have you

The current fundraising quarter for political candidates comes to an end tomorrow. Time to donate even a little love to a candidate of your choice. Come on - they'd do it for you.

(This plea is cross-posted...)

Open Wide...

Kathy Griffin in Iraq

As I've mentioned before, I love Kathy Griffin. The past two episodes of her show My Life on the D-List have followed her from L.A. to Kuwait, then Tikrit, then Baghdad, where she went to put on comedy shows for the troops. Along the way, she visited injured soldiers and spent the night in one of Saddam's palaces; during her stay, there were incoming rockets, and she had to do the first part of her show in the dark for security reasons. Below is a clip from the first of the two episodes. The best part is at the end, when the soldiers talk about what it meant for them to have her there. It's a really amazing thing people do, who go over there to entertain our troops. If you have the opportunity to catch these two episodes in re-runs, I recommend watching them. And, if you're like me, and you regularly break into sobs watching anything that has to do with the war, keep the tissues handy.

Open Wide...

Let’s Get Creative

Broadsheet’s Lynn Harris:

I've said it before, I'll say it again -- and now Rachel Joy Larris at TomPaine.com says there's a renewed call, too: The "pro-choice" movement needs a better name. Larris reports that Al Quinlan, a pollster who has been working with opponents of the abortion ban in South Dakota, says that "'choice' carries a meaning that works against us."
Lynn points out that “choice” is not only insufficient because choosing to get an abortion is simply not the same as choosing what outfit to wear to work each day, but also because it evokes for too many people the image of “a bunch of affluent women choosing among an array of options… When it comes to the rights we’re fighting for, after all, so many women have next to no choice at all.”

There’s more at the link, but it boils down to this: Is there a better name for what we generally call “pro-choice”?

I tend to favor “reproductive rights,” which, to my mind, encompasses everything from the right to comprehensive sex education to emergency contraception to abortion to the decision not to have children at all. It’s not very catchy, though, I guess. Got any ideas?

Open Wide...

More Gore

Al Gore on The Daily Show. I watched it last night—and then I moaned endlessly about how different things could have been…as per usual.

Open Wide...

Matthews: Unleashed! (part 2)

Here’s video of Chris Matthews’ insane appearance on The Colbert Report that I was talking about yesterday.

Open Wide...

Bush: “Knuckle Under! Knuckle Under!”

Under the nifty headline Bush Sharpens His Attack on Democrats, the WaPo reports that Bush has resurrected his accusation that anyone who doesn’t want to “stay the course” as defined by his awesome band of warmongers is “waving the white flag of surrender.”

"There's a group in the opposition party who are willing to retreat before the mission is done," he said. "They're willing to wave the white flag of surrender. And if they succeed, the United States will be worse off, and the world will be worse off."

Bush's tone has turned tougher as he appears at more political events. At a Washington fundraiser this month, he said it was important that lawmakers "not wave the white flag of surrender" without asserting that any of them were actually doing so. In his appearance in this St. Louis suburb, he said directly that some Democrats want to surrender, adopting the more cutting approach of his senior political adviser, Karl Rove.
When Dan Bartlett was challenged last week to identify a Democrat who was “waving the white flag of surrender,” he couldn’t do it, but, as we all know, reality is very low priority for the Bush administration.

Maybe they’re just confused by the battalion of white flag waving protestors I’ve dispatched to follow Bush around everywhere he goes ever since he first uttered his ridiculous statement earlier this month. If that’s the case, they ought to look a little closer at the flags.

Open Wide...

Stolen VA Laptop Recovered

FBI says the personal data up to 26.5 million veterans and military personnel contained on the laptop was not accessed, but “more tests” are planned.

It was turned in by someone who is not considered a suspect.

Open Wide...

Beer and Evolution

Check out this Guinness advert. Absolutely brilliant!

These adverts, of course, only run in Britain, where things like evolution—and Guinness being a fundamental part of life—aren’t up for debate.

Is there anything more pathetic than the thought that this commercial, if run in the States, would probably elicit a boycott care of the fundies, but the beer ad I saw last night in which a woman "hustles" free drinks for her brother and his mate using her feminine wiles against stupidly horny men, doesn't even raise most eyebrows?

(Via Mark at Cosmic Variance.)

UPDATE: Speaking of evolution...

Open Wide...

Berkeley Takes Impeachment to the Ballot

Berkeley will be the first city in the US to put a vote for impeachment on the ballot.

With overwhelming support from Berkeley residents, the Berkeley City Council unanimously passed a resolution Tuesday night to be the first jurisdiction in the United States to let the public vote for the president's impeachment…

Voters will be asked to vote yes or no on a measure that will read, "Shall the City of Berkeley call upon the United States House of Representatives to initiate proceedings for the impeachment and removal from office of President George W. Bush and Vice President Richard B. Cheney, call upon the California State Legislature to submit a Resolution in support of impeachment to the United States House of Representatives, and establish a Temporary Task Force on Impeachment?"

The measure is strictly advisory, but the city hopes it sparks a national debate on the presidency and the Constitution.
Considering that if they get other local cities to follow suit, they could get a couple million votes for impeachment in the Bay Area alone, it’s a good plan. Let the people speak directly to the issue, since no one else—including the Democrats—wants to touch it with a 10-foot pole.

(Thank to Ang for passing that along.)

Open Wide...

Harry Potter and the Half-Brained Dumbass

Back in April I wrote about a Georgia woman who believes what The Onion said about Harry Potter and decided that she wanted them banned from the public schools. In May, the school board came unanimously down on the side of Harry with one member then noting:

"Our students do understand the difference between fact and fiction. Let's let those who want to read the Harry Potter books have the opportunity to do so."


At the time, Ms. Mallory had not made up her mind about appealing the decision to the state of Georgia. Well, now she has:

LAWRENCEVILLE - Just when it seemed Harry Potter had fought and won his latest battle, he will be facing yet another a series of challenges. And this time, it will be at the state level.

Laura Mallory, a Loganville mother of four, is appealing the Gwinnett Board of Education's unanimous decision to keep the best-selling books on school shelves.
Her appeal will continue the debate that began when Mallory filed complaints against each of the six books, writing that they included "evil themes, witchcraft, demonic activity, murder, evil blood sacrifice, spells and teaching children all of this."


*Ahem* It is important to remember that Ms. Mallory has not even read the books because they are "too long" for her. She got her info from "christian message boards and Harry Potter fan sites". Yep, that's right. Christian message boards and fan sites. Fabulous.

Anyway, the Gwinnett County Public Schools superintendent now has 10 days to file the BoE meeting transcripts and the evidence they used to the state. After that, the Georgia DoE will determine Harry's fate in Gwinnett.

All because one dumbass who hasn't even read the books wants to ban them. Ms. Mallory doesn't want to give everyone else the option that she chose to exercise--just not read them--no she wants to control the choices of other people based on her supernatural beliefs. Disgusting arrogance from a willfully ignorant individual. How surprising. Gah, as I said before: I hate it when mouth-breathing fuckwits try to make the rest of the planet as offensively stupid as they are.

Open Wide...

Hilarious

Spudsy (showing our ages rather precisely) just passed this along to me with the note, "Sure, we're headed towards the Apocalypse, the planet is dying, people hate anyone different now more than ever, and Republicans still control everything. But at least there's stuff like this!" Too true. Enjoy!


(Per the description, this was performed as part of a college talent show.)

Open Wide...

"Taylor Hicks must be stopped"


"Pos-si-bil-i-ties!"

There's a thread on the P-D's Cards Talk forum whose sentiment is close to my heart. The heavily-run Ford commercial featuring Hicks on an American Idol-type stage, whirling and shouting and gesticulating to beat the band, has quickly become the most irritating ad in recent memory. It would be bad enough if the commercial appeared infrequently; as it is, you just can't get away from it. And the rapidity with which the self-styled "Soul Patrol" singer began cashing in on his new-found celebrity doesn't help. When Hicks shouts "I get what I want," surely he's talking about the generous paycheck Ford gave him for his trouble. Nothing wrong with getting paid, but couldn't Hicks have waited a few months at least before he started shilling?

Of course, Hicks and his commercial do have their admirers:

Reviewing the Ford commercial and the song "Possibilities" written for the promotion, Hicks does a dynamic job, believably belting out the tune. Interestingly, there is some on-line buzz being generated for the song to be recorded outside the bounds of the Ford pitch.

I'm proud to [be] watching the Soul Patrollman ride his wave of destiny.

It's interesting all right, watching ubiquitous commerical fodder become artistic (nominally) product.

Urgh.

(Cross-posted for the public good...)

Open Wide...

Knuckled Under

As Paul noted in his QotD, I have no love whatsoever for John McCain. He is the arch evil villain Huggy McClingman to my Zoologica, and should he get the GOP nomination in 2008, the written history of the ensuing battle will be worthy of no less than Homer himself.

But in terms of an antipathy from which I can draw little humor about its depths and causes, no one, but no one, is worse than Dubya. He is, truly, peerless in his capacity to send me into a red-faced, fist-clenching fury that even nearly two solid years of blog rants has not managed to assuage. In the best moments, I am only riddled with hopeless despair, as opposed to wanting to put my fist through the nearest wall.

The majority of my ire’s source is, of course, his policies, which are catastrophic—the ultimate realization of every extremist conservative wet dream, marching destructively across the American landscape and annihilating in their path any and all remnant of progressive policy or thought. And then there’s the other thing that fuels my indignant discontent, the flipside of that now-familiar canard about what a great drinking buddy Bush would be—I just don’t like the guy.

Yesterday, I read an excerpt of the much-discussed new Ron Suskind book, The One Percent Doctrine, at Drum’s place that perfectly encapsulated what it is I despise about the president. The scene is Harvard Business School, 1975. Bush is captain of his class' basketball team, which is playing the Class of '76 team.

The game was tight. The other team's captain, Gary Engle...went up for a shot. Bush slugged him — an elbow to the mouth, knocking him to the parquet. "What the hell are you doing?" Engle remembers saying. "What, you want to get into a fistfight and both of us end up in the fucking emergency room?" Bush just smiled.

Moments later, at the other end of the court, Engle went up high for a rebound and felt someone chop his legs out from under him. Bush again. Engle jumped up and threw the ball in Bush's face. The two went at it until two teams of future business leaders leapt on their captains, pulling them apart. Engle, angry and vexed by what had happened, began wondering why the hell Bush would have done what he did. He lost his composure, and his team lost its leader.

A few years later, Engle...bumped into Jeb Bush....Engle, a Republican contributor, had thought from time to time about his game against George. Nothing like that had happened to him before or since. This was his chance to get a little insight about it. He told the story. Jeb kind of laughed, Engle recalled. "In Texas, they call guys like George 'a hard case.' It wasn't easy being his brother, either. He truly enjoys getting people to knuckle under."
He truly enjoys getting people to knuckle under.

Drum comments, “This, apparently, is the real Bush Doctrine: America's goal is to get the rest of the world to knuckle under to us, one dimwitted action at a time.” Clearly, that’s right—but it’s also incomplete. The Bush doctrine is to get the rest of the world to knuckle under to America, and America to knuckle under to him.

He found his way into office because the SCOTUS knuckled under to him. He’s enjoyed unprecedented favorable coverage in the face of disaster because the media knuckled under to him. His administration acts outside the law with no accountability because Congress knuckled under to him. And those who don’t submit willingly to the threat of an elbow jab get that elbow in the mouth. What progressive, war dissenter, Republican who refuses to toe the party line—any person who disagrees with him in any measure—has not felt the crunch of bone against his or her jaw as Bush or one of his army of operatives lands the perfect shot with a mendacious smear, denied access, or an accusation of treason?

And worst of all, he enjoys it.


He always has. Illegal, but gratifying. Kind of like leaking the identity of a covert CIA operative. Or penning in signing statements and claiming executive privilege to ignore the law. Or going after Saddam on the basis of cherry-picked intelligence, delivered to a fear-paralyzed populace while asserting hopes that war is avoidable, even as it the plan is already in motion. He knows it’s wrong, but it feels so right.

Those of us who refuse to knuckle under gaze out at a country we no longer recognize through swollen and blackened eyes. We feel beat up— tired and weak to our very bones. Some days I swear I’d rather plunge a dull butter knife into my temple than write one more word documenting their endless stream of bullshit, even though I’ve no delusions about the importance of my individual action; it doesn’t mean a whole lot in the scheme of things. But I’ll be goddamned if I knuckle under for Bush and his thugs. I’ll never give them the satisfaction. And that means something to me.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day


We all know that Shakespeare's Sister has had... ahem... a few things to say about her arch-nemesis, John McCain, AKA Senator Huggy McClingman. (Here is one of my favorites.) And it should come as no surprise to any regular readers of this blog that Michelle Malkin is #1 on "Paul the Spud's Top 10 Most Loathed List." (For example, I got a little upset at here here.)

So, the Question of the Day is: Who is the bane of your existence?

It doesn't have to be a Conservative or a batshit crazy wingnut. They can be a Democrat, a Progressive, a Republican... or someone like Laura Ingraham, the Human Nasal Passage.

Who really gets the bile boiling for you?

Open Wide...

Caption This Photo


Rockem sockem, baby! HA!

Open Wide...