You'll never guess my secret identity


I don’t read comics regularly anymore; I don’t think I ever really did, but there were certainly times when I aspired too. But I do keep my ear to the ground about the recent big developments at Marvel and DC, and Spiderman was always my favorite superhero, so I definitely had to read up on this- Spiderman outs himself to the press:

In the latest edition of the Marvel comic "Civil War" on sale, Spiderman does the unthinkable and removes his Spidey mask to publicly reveal his hidden identity.
“Civil War” is yet another attempt to take the Marvel universe down a more serious path. Now, instead of mutants taking the brunt of the public persecution, the government is demanding that all superheroes register their names and secret identities so they can be policed as “living weapons of mass destruction.” Peter Parker supports the registration, and to prove it, he puts his money where his mouth is and reveals himself to the world.

The title of the Yahoo article is fairly suggestive- Spidey “outs himself”? Huh, that’s deucedly ambiguous of them. It’s like they’re trying to say when a guy tells everybody he likes to dress up in a colorful costume and beat-up strangers who are also wearing colorful costumes, that there’s some sort subtext going on. Like this guy is exiting some sort of wardrobe… If you proceed along that line, there’s some fascinating potential for social commentary. The GOP has basically done everything but label gays as “living weapons”- the whole Marriage Protection Act is certainly suggestive, as one imagines hundreds of thousands of covert homosexuals sneaking into suburban households, hiding wedding rings and covertly adding “Queer as Folk” sets in DVD collections between The Punisher and Quiz Show. The idea that our government, as deeply paranoid and contemptuous as it is of anything even remotely human, would want records kept on anyone who could apparently rip through the fabric of the American Dream simply by their very existence, isn’t beyond the realm of plausibility.

View it as a comic book story, though, and I have my doubts. Like I said, Spidey is my favorite; he’s funny, he’s a geek, and he’s making time with this smokin’ redhead, so what’s not to love? Also important- unlike Batman and Superman and others, he’s basically a nobody in his day-to-day life. This has diminished somewhat over the years (see afore mentioned smokin’ redhead), but at the character’s best, he’s got bills to pay, a lousy love-life, and his boss is making his life hell in and out of costume. One of the biggest problems Peter has faced in the past couple of decades has been the inability of writers to keep his personal life turbulent without resorting to extraordinarily convoluted lengths, including the pointless resurrection of a long dead arch-nemesis and the dread Clone Saga, who’s name can still set geeks like myself into paroxysms of fury. When they weren’t trying to solve the problem by making it worse, they were marrying Parker off, so the former loser- the guy who had such an everyday life outside of super-heroing you couldn’t help identify with him- was now hitched to a superstar model, and gliding down Easy Street.

This new revelation, well, it could go either way. Obviously it’s going to lead to some new complications in his life, which means story possibilities, but it also means losing Spidey’s status as an outsider, and I don’t think that’s such a good idea. If Peter Parker was the main character in a limited series of some sort, or a novel, or a movie trilogy, it would be a fine plot twist- but the problem with iconic characters in serial stories with basically no conclusions is that dramatic changes like this will inevitably be retroactively removed from continuity (retconned, for those in the know) the moment a new creative team comes on board and decides they prefer the “classic” Spidey. It’s basically impossible to trust any change that seriously alters the public perception of the character; like the infamous DC Deaths of the mid-90’s (okay, technically Batman didn’t die, just got his back broke, but you know what I mean), so many of these story events are simply short-lived publicity stunts designed to raise public consciousness of struggling series, at the cost of the patience of long-term readers.

This could work for a while, though. A few years back, J. Michael Straczynski had the balls to let Aunt May discover Peter’s secret, and it re-invigorated the character; for the first time in forever, May was a vibrant, dynamic personality, and not just a walking punchline. A bold step like this doesn’t automatically mean failure, and if the writers are able to use this new paradigm to revitalize Spidey and keep true to the core of what made him popular in the first place, this might actually be more than just comic nerd minutiae to scare the squares a decade from now.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Since yesterday, we did favorite films, the obvious follow-up is least favorite films.

I’ve still got to go with Alexander, which pains me, because I love both Colin Farrell and Angelina Jolie, but that is one huge, heaping crapfest.

There may be some other films in existence that are (almost inconceivably) more painful to watch, and would leave me even closer to seriously contemplating gouging out my eyeballs with a dull butterknife, but most of them probably didn’t have the budget nor the elsewhere demonstrated talent to which Alexander was privy.

Open Wide...

Lamb of Steel

Superman is not just highly heterosexual—he’s also Jesus!

"It is so on the nose that anyone who has not caught on that Superman is a Christ figure, you think, 'Who else could it be referring to?' " said Steve Skelton, who wrote a book examining parallels between Superman and Christ.

The premise of the new Superman movie alone has fueled speculation that it's wearing its biblical comparisons on its long, tight sleeve. Superman, in the film, returns to Earth after a long absence, a narrative that's been likened to Jesus' death and resurrection.
You see, that’s why Superman doesn’t wear gloves. Otherwise, they’d never be able to get the nails in.

One little hitch (as was also pointed out by Dave in comments the other day):

Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster, who introduced Superman in 1938 in a comic book, were Jews who were inspired by the Old Testament story of Moses and the supernatural golem character from Jewish folklore. (Author Michael Chabon made much of these similarities in his Pulitzer Prize-winning novel, "The Adventures of Kavalier and Clay.")
I guess that makes him a Judeo-Christian superhero, just like our country is Judeo-Christian. Until, that is, the Dominionists dropped that whole pretense.

Open Wide...

Caption This Photo


U.S. President George W. Bush listens to questions at a news
conference after returning from Iraq in the Rose Garden of the
White House in Washington, June 14, 2006.
REUTERS/Jim Young (UNITED STATES)

Open Wide...

Gee... you think?

(Ranting along with Shakes' post below.)

That 33 percent must really sting. And they were so sure that Zarqawi would boost him back up into the high 30s!

Half of Americans think the level of violence in Iraq will be unchanged by Zarqawi's death, while 30 percent say it will actually lead to more attacks against U.S. forces.
Oh, crap!

So, keeping in line with the new Republican plan of "Bush finally sort of acknowleges a mistake so we don't look like total fucking douchebags, what with elections coming up and all," Bush has finally stated that Guantanamo just might make us look bad.


WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President George W. Bush acknowledged on Wednesday that the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, where three detainees committed suicide, has damaged the U.S. image abroad and said it should be shut down.

But he said a plan for relocating the prisoners was needed first and he also was awaiting a Supreme Court decision about the forum for handling detainee cases.
But not that bad.

"I'd like to close Guantanamo, but I also recognize that we're holding some people there that are darn dangerous and that we better have a plan to deal with them in our courts," Bush told a news conference in the White House Rose Garden.
Hooray... more "Guy You'd Wanna Have a Beer With" talk. Yessiree bob, they're darn dangity ding-dong dangerous. Of course, we can't figure out which ones are dangerous. And most of them are being held there without being charged with anything. But trust him, they're mega-super-ooper dangerous. So you might not want to hold your breath while waiting for that closing.

Bush said Guantanamo is seen by some countries as an example of the United States not living up to the principles it espouses on human rights.

"No question, Guantanamo sends, you know, a signal to some of our friends -- provides an excuse, for example, to say, 'The United States is not upholding the values that they're trying encourage other countries to adhere to,"' Bush said.
But it's just an excuse. We know we're really the good guys... every horrific blow to human rights we commit is, you know, completely justified. And it's only some countries, after all. Other countries cheer and dance when we treat prisoners like animals.

When all else fails... point to the troops.

"I also want the people to understand, here and around the world, that 99.9 percent of our troops are honorable, decent people who are serving our country under difficult conditions," Bush said.
Further proof that our country is being run by a six-year-old, if the "darn dangerous" stuff didn't clue you in. "99.9 percent." There's a bad apple in there somewhere. Of course, none of the bastards on top have caused any of this to happen... it must be that o.1 percent.

So, what, there's pretty much one guy ruining America's image in the minds of the rest of the planet?


By jove, I think he's got it.

(Cross-posts melt in your mouth, not in your hand.)

Open Wide...

More from the Rose Garden

It’s the press conference that keeps giving and giving.

Check out this exchange:

Bush: You gonna ask your question with shades on?

Wallsten: Yes...

Bush: But there's no sun out here.

Wallsten: It depends on your perspective.

Bush: Touché.
The reporter to whom he was speaking is legally blind.

C&L has the video in case you can't view the one below. Daou has more.

Open Wide...

Bush Admits Gitmo Suxxx

From the Rose Garden (for real):

[Bush] acknowledged on Wednesday that the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, where three detainees committed suicide, has damaged the U.S. image abroad and said it should be shut down.

…”I'd like to close Guantanamo, but I also recognize that we're holding some people there that are darn dangerous and that we better have a plan to deal with them in our courts," Bush told a news conference in the White House Rose Garden.

…"No question, Guantanamo sends, you know, a signal to some of our friends -- provides an excuse, for example, to say, 'The United States is not upholding the values that they're trying encourage other countries to adhere to,"' Bush said.
Looks like someone spiked the Preznit’s Kool-Aid with smart juice this morning.

Open Wide...

Photo Dump: Georgie in the Rose Garden


President Bush: All right, you press bastards. I’m done with my specifizing, so now you’kn ask me some questions. But make ’em so’s I like ’em, or there’s gonna be trouble.

Newest press corps member, Shakespeare’s Sister, who managed to snag herself a day pass after falsifying her background as a former gay hooker writing for an unaccredited online news service, is called on to ask the first question, over the sounds of loud throat clearing by Dan Bartlett, Tony Snow, and Karl Rove.

Shakespeare’s Sister: Good morning, Mr. President.

President Bush: How’s it going, Chubby McGee?

Shakespeare’s Sister: Ahh, my first day with the press corps and I’ve already got a nickname. Thank you, sir. It’s going fine. My question is about Republican National Committee Chairman Ken Mehlman’s appearance on The Daily Show last night. He said that your administration repeatedly, unapologetically, and boldly lies because of—quote—greed, cynicism, all those things—end quote. Do you agree with Mr. Mehlman that your administration is rife with greed and cynicism, or do you have another explanation as to why nothing but a steady stream of dissembling, misrepresentations, and outright falsehoods comes from members of your administration?


President Bush: Hey, hang on there, Chubs. When did we ever lie?

Shakespeare’s Sister: Well, for example, you lied about Iraq having WMDs, about links between Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein, about viewing war as a last resort, about Congress having the same prewar intelligence—


President Bush: Hey, hang on a minute, heh heh, you know, presidenting is hard work—

Shakespeare’s Sister: …about how much the war would cost, about how long it would take, about our being greeted as liberators, about Social Security going bankrupt, about the safety of personal retirement accounts, about HSAs, about who most benefits from your tax cuts—


President Bush: Now just one second! Lemme finish, lemme finish!

Shakespeare’s Sister: …about your budgets, about your opponents, about dissenters, about whistleblowers, about national security concerns, about leaks—


President Bush: Come on, now. Heh heh. Where’s your proof?

Shakespeare’s Sister: …about domestic spying, about FISA not providing time for warrants, about Congress having given authority for wiretapping, about eavesdropping being necessary to thwart terrorist attacks, about the program being limited, about previous presidents having had and used the same authority—


President Bush: Who, me?

Shakespeare’s Sister: …about no one anticipating the breach of the levees in New Orleans, about the Medicare prescription drug plan, about global warming, about your own history with the Texas Air National Guard, about having a mandate, about not paying attention to polls—


President Bush: I…I…homina homina

Shakespeare’s Sister: …about gay marriage undermining the sanctity of marriage, about the National Anthem being sung in Spanish subverting our culture, about caring about women and children, and minorities, and soldiers, and law enforcement, while you cut funding for programs and attack legislation that support them—


President Bush: Uh, once. I think I only did that once.

Shakespeare’s Sister: …about caring about this country and being interested in serving all of its people, not just those who contribute the most to your campaigns or promise to get out the vote if you hate on the same people they do—


President Bush: I’ve got just one thing to say! This press conference is over. Thank you, and God Bless America.


I think that went pretty well.

Open Wide...

Bush Says GOP Will Win in November

Uh-huh:

"I believe we're going to hold the House and the Senate because our philosophy is one that is forward-looking and optimistic and has worked," Bush told reporters at a White House news conference.

…"The elections are a long way off," the president said nearly five months out. "What's going to matter is who's got the plan that will enable us to succeed in Iraq and keep the economy growing."
And who’s got the secret passwords to them Diebold machines, heh-heh.

Open Wide...

Health(s)care

Anytime I have a debate about healthcare with someone who doesn’t support the idea of socialized medicine, s/he invariably asserts that America has the best healthcare system in the world, and hey, if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.

First of all, we don’t have the best healthcare system in the world, even if we (some of us) have access to (arguably) the best and most cutting-edge health care services, but I’ll leave that for another time. At the moment, I’d prefer to address the claim that “it ain’t broke.” Because, guess what? It is.

Half a million times a year — about once every minute — an ambulance carrying a sick patient is turned away from a full emergency room and sent to another one farther away. It's a sobering symptom of how the nation's emergency-care system is overcrowded and overwhelmed, "at its breaking point," concludes a major investigation by the influential Institute of Medicine.

That crisis comes from just day-to-day emergencies. Emergency rooms are far from ready to handle the mass casualties that a bird flu epidemic or terrorist strike would bring, the institute warned Wednesday in a three-volume report.

…At the root of the problem: Demand for emergency care is surging, even as the capacity for hospitals, ambulance services and other emergency workers to provide it is dropping.
There’s more at the link—and it doesn’t get any better. Their finding that “only 6 percent of emergency departments had all the supplies needed, such as child-size equipment, to treat” children, for example, makes me so angry that I could spit—and I’m not even a parent.

So why is demand for emergency care surging, anyway? Are we suddenly becoming a nation of accident-prone klutzes? Well, no. It more likely has something to do with the fact that since 1993, America has lost 703 hospitals and 425 ERs—and that, according to the US Census Bureau, as of August 2005, nearly 46 million Americans (1 out of every 7) are uninsured. Six million have been added to the rolls of the uninsured just since Bush took office. When people don’t have insurance, they tend to use the emergency room to seek treatment for many health issues for which insured people go to primary care providers, which puts an undue strain on emergency rooms, “which by law must treat every patient who shows up.”

The system is broken. We’re plied into complacency with scare stories about Canadians desperately crawling over the border for medical care or Britain’s horrific NHS, but most of the stories fall somewhere in between “exception to the rule” and “utter bunk.” No system is perfect, but ours is a lot less perfect than many others, and, most importantly, a lot less perfect than it could be, given half a chance.

Open Wide...

Thank a Progressive for the Luxury of Your Disdain

[This is a re-run, but I’ve been so bloody irritated by all the conservative apologists for rightwing extremism lately, and the routine and unquestioned marginalization of progressives—including by Dems who espouse centrism at the expense of true progressivism—that I’m reposting it again, because it’s exactly how I’m feeling…again.]

There seems to be endless tolerance for the likes of Rush Limbaugh and Bill O’Reilly and Ann Coulter and Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell and James Dobson etc. etc. etc. In my experience, even moderates who don’t particularly like them don’t seem to find the same reserve of contempt for them that they do for the mere thought of an unapologetic liberal.

And you know what? It’s really beginning to piss me off.

Thanks to progressives, we have Social Security, a minimum wage, welfare, a 40-hour work week, overtime pay, job protections, equal opportunity, and labor unions—all of which are resoundingly supported by a plurality of Americans, and all of which are also perpetually under attack from conservatives.

Thanks to progressives, we have legalized birth control and safe and legal abortions—both of which are supported by a plurality of Americans, and both of which are also perpetually under attack from conservatives.

Thanks to progressives, we have equality (such as it is), and strides made toward full equality for all Americans are being made almost exclusively by progressives, as conservatives continue their assault on minority communities, women’s rights, and LGBT equality.

Thanks to progressives, we have voting rights and civil rights protections (such as they are), and efforts to ensure real and unassailable security of each are being made almost exclusively by progressives, as conservatives continue their assault on minority voters, fair elections, and civil rights.

Thanks to progressives, rural America has electricity, schools are desegregated, we have a National Endowment for the Arts, we have Public Broadcasting, and a conservative president’s vision—Nixon’s Environmental Protection Agency—is now bolstered by a national environmental movement, even in the face of an unprecedented battering of the environment by a neoconservative administration.

Of the Americans who criticize the current Social Security system, most don’t want to see it dismantled. Of the Americans who criticize our flawed welfare system, most still endorse its existence—if reformed—as part of an integral social safety net. Most Americans who don’t support equal marriage rights for gays still support a prohibition on job and housing discrimination. Most Americans who wouldn’t vote for a female, black, or gay presidential candidate still support women’s, minorities’, and gays’ right to vote. Most Americans who bitch and moan about the NEA still support publicly funded museums, libraries, university art programs, and theaters.

The America that most people want, and the America that most people live in, was brought to them by progressives, who still want to make sure every American, irrespective of skin color, sexual orientation, gender, religion, or class, can live in the America they want to live in, too. And on their behalf, I ask those who seek to marginalize the Left: How dare you?

The truth is, any American who disdains progressives probably has progressives to thank for that luxury.

I’m not suggesting that progressive policies are flawless, or that progressives have solved all of America’s problems (or are even capable of doing so). But I would like a modicum of perspective from those—including many of those in the wanking Democratic Party—who have benefited from scores of legislation derived from an inclusive but vast progressive movement, and now see fit to stand in judgment of progressives, condemning them to disenfranchisement from the political process and conflating them with the radical Right. Wanting drinkable water, breathable air, a functioning safety net, universal healthcare, alternative energies, true equality, fair elections, fair taxation, improved public education, and increased workers’ rights isn’t radical. It’s a worthy and achievable agenda, and, perhaps more importantly, it’s what America wants. Polled on issues alone, that is domestic agenda most Americans support.

And the conservative movement, including the current administration and the congressional GOP leadership, does not simply dispute progressives’ tactics for achieving these goals. They have systematically sought to undermine each and every last one of them.

Dems moan that the GOP is great at framing language and debates, and that’s true. It’s difficult to compete with the kind of mendacity that allows one to label a massive, orchestrated plundering of the environment The Clean Skies Act. But the Dems need to stop being ashamed of progressives. We are the history of much of what is right with America, and I’m sick and bloody tired of the compulsion to categorize us as anything less. You, and everyone else who looks down their noses at progressives, can shove your contempt for us straight up your arses, you ungrateful pricks.

Open Wide...

Winning Hearts and Minds

Unfuckingbelievable:

The U.S. Marine Corps today said it agrees with a prominent national Islamic advocacy group that a video posted on the Internet apparently showing Marines cheering a song that glorifies the killing of Iraqi civilians is "insensitive" and "inappropriate."

…The video, called "hadji girl," purports to be a "marine in iraq (sic) singing a song about hadji." (A "Hajji" is a person who has made the Islamic pilgrimage to Mecca, but the term has often been used as a pejorative by U.S. troops in Iraq.) The song tells of a U.S. Marine's encounter with an Iraqi woman. It was viewed by almost 50,000 people. (The video was removed from the youtube.com Web site after CAIR issued its news release.)

The song's lyrics include: "I grabbed her little sister and put her in front of me. As the bullets began to fly, the blood sprayed from between her eyes, and then I laughed maniacally ... I blew those little f--kers to eternity ... They should have known they were f--king with the Marines." Members of the audience, not shown in the video, laughed and cheered wildly for these lyrics.
You can watch the video here.

Perhaps even more unbelievable, the assmonkeys at Little Green Fucktards (to which I will not link) are describing this as the “Mainstream Media Disgrace of the Month,” and defending it by saying the MSM “leave out the most important part: the people who kill the ‘little sister’ in this darkly humorous song are — not the Marines — but her father and brother, as they attempt to perpetrate an ambush.” Of course, what LGF conveniently ignores is that, in the song, the little sister is killed because the marine, as noted in the above lyric excerpt, uses the little girl as a shield.

The featured performer is Marine Cpl. Joshua Belile, who says the “song was written in good humor.”

“I think it was a joke that is trying to be taken seriously,” he said. “I think it’s a joke, and anybody who tries to take it seriously knows it’s a joke. People can’t just laugh at it and let it go.”
Yeah, it’s fucking hilarious. I’m sure the family members of the next American civilians who are killed in a terrorist attack will be laughing uproariously that some members of the military meant to protect them spent their time in Iraq inflaming hatred against Americans with such hilarity.

Open Wide...

Commenting Glitchy

HaloScan seems to be assigning random times to comments. I've looked at the settings, and don't see anything that I can "fix," so I think it's just being glitchy. (It's happening at other blogs, too.) I'll update if I find out any info. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Open Wide...

Actual Hardball Transcript

Hugest Plonking Knob-End in Punditry, Chris Matthews, discussing Ann Coulter’s latest tome with guests Tucker Carlson, Rita Cosby, and Mike Barnicle:

MATTHEWS: Tucker, did you reach into your pocket for this purchase or was this a perk of office?

CARLSON: Come on, I work in television, Chris. I don‘t buy books. I get them for free.

COSBY: Tucker doesn‘t pay for anything.

MATTHEWS: I don‘t want to have to call you one of these nebbishes. That‘s all. I want to take you up the nebbish list.

CARLSON: I must say, I love, I‘m not defending the passages, she annoyed the hell out of me on the show, they make you mad, those passages. On the other hand, do you make liberals mad?

MATTHEWS: Do you find her physically attractive, Tucker?

CARLSON: I‘m not going to answer that, because the answer, I don‘t want to hurt anybody‘s feelings. That‘s not the point.

MATTHEWS: Positively.

COSBY: Don‘t ask me that question.

MATTHEWS: Mike, do you want to weigh in here as an older fellow. Do you find her to be a physically attractive woman?

BARNICLE: I‘m too old to be doing that. I had enough fights in my life.

MATTHEWS: OK, Rita, do you find her to be a physically attractive woman?

COSBY: I‘ll throw it back to you, Chris, do you find her attractive.

MATTHEWS: You guys are all afraid to answer. No, I find her—I wouldn‘t put her—well, she doesn‘t pass the Chris Matthews test.
Thanks, Chris, for making sure what gets discussed is the shit that really matters, like whether a human being so revolting that she accuses the 9/11 widows of “enjoying their husbands’ deaths” without a hint of shame is attractive. Tune in tonight when Chris asks his panelists to address the perplexing conundrum of whether Rush Limbaugh is sponge-worthy.

(Hat tip Jossip.)

UPDATE: Spittle & Ink has gotten a hold of the actual form Chris Matthews uses to see if people pass the Chris Matthews Attractiveness Test.

Open Wide...

BushCo.’s Global Warming Strategy

Unfortunately, the audience that was privy to this report was not the American people. It was BBC viewers of the program “Panorama” two weeks ago. (Via The Daily Background.)

Open Wide...

Congress is doing such an excellent job…

…they decided to give themselves a raise!

Despite record low approval ratings, House lawmakers Tuesday embraced a $3,300 pay raise that would increase their salaries to $168,500.

The 2 percent cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) would be the seventh straight for members of the House and Senate. Lawmakers easily squelched an attempt by Rep. Jim Matheson, D-Utah, to get a direct vote to block the increase, which is automatically awarded unless lawmakers vote to block it.
The current federal minimum wage is $5.15 an hour—last raised in 1998. That means someone working 40 hours a week, 52 weeks a year, makes $10,712 a year, or 6.3% of what a member of Congress does.

Of course, most members of Congress don’t work 40 hours a week, 52 weeks a year. During the Bush administration, the number of days worked by Congress in a session (two years) has fallen to below 250—and the three days a week they’re meant to spend in session aren’t really three days at all. “They return from their districts on Tuesday nights, and sometimes early Wednesday, and head home again Thursday afternoon.” We’re mostly paying them to spend their time fundraising for reelection.

If you had record low approval ratings and decided you were only going to work about a day and a half a week, do you think your boss would give you a raise?

(Hat tip, Eponymous.)

Open Wide...

Mehlman

Did everyone see Mehlman on The Daily Show last night? If you missed it, Crooks and Liars has the video.

I’m not sure if my favorite part was his calling Afghanistan a failed state, or his strangely honest admission that “greed, cynicism, all those things” caused the GOP to become liars. Yeesh.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

We've done this one before, but it was a long time ago, so it's time for a revival: What are your top 5 favorite movies of all time?

If you had asked me yesterday, or asked me tomorrow, you'd probably get a different list entirely, because I love far too many films for a genuine Top 5 (and how can Star Wars and Magnolia even be compared?), but here are the first 5 that came to mind as favorites (aside from the two I just mentioned):

1. The Lord of the Rings trilogy (a total cheat, I know)
2. Rear Window
3. Cinema Paradiso
4. Love Actually
5. Annie Hall

Open Wide...

The Power of Football

It’s a miracle:

A 94-year-old declared dead suddenly sprang up and asked when Germany were next playing in the World Cup.

When told she had been declared dead by doctors, Maria Mueller replied: "Not likely, not until I see if Germany wins the World Cup. There's still life in these old bones yet, and I certainly couldn't miss the football."

Mrs Mueller had been found slumped over in her chair by son Bernhard Mueller, 66, at their home in Luegde. Neither Bernhard nor a local doctor could find a pulse.
I heard she likes the man-on-man action.


Heart of Hearts: Lee Makel

Open Wide...

Caption This Photo


Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Pa., shakes hands with first lady Laura Bush after she made remarks
on his behalf at a fundraiser in Villanova, Pa., Tuesday June 13, 2006. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke)

Open Wide...