Lips

In addition to Morrissey’s new album, which arrives today—and which I will hopefully have in my hot little hands in mere hours, pant pant—The Flaming Lips, with whom I have rung in several New Year’s and who I love only slightly less than The Smiths (The Soft Bulletin may be my favorite non-Smiths or Bowie album ever), have a new one out today called At War with the Mystics. Mr. Shakes passed on this article from CNN, which notes:

"At War with the Mystics," however, is a little (just a little) more direct. It can slide comfortably next to "Bulletin" and "Yoshimi" as the third post-"Zaireeka" Lips album, but it's also as playful as the earlier work and likely to be defined by its political themes.

On "Free Radicals" Coyne takes aim at George Bush: "You think you're radical, but you're not so radical. In fact, you're fanatical."
Good stuff. I could use a few good protest tunes to blog to.

Open Wide...

Donkey Doo

From a school textbook in India's western state of Rajasthan:

A donkey is like a housewife. In fact, the donkey is a shade better, for while the housewife may sometimes complain and walk off to her parents' home, you'll never catch the donkey being disloyal to his master.
Sometimes donkeys kick their masters in the bollocks, too.

Shimla Parasher, chief of the women’s wing of the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party, which approved the textbook, has threatened protests if the offensive material is not taken out of the schoolbook.

"The comparison was made in good humour. However the protests have been taken note of and the education board is in the process of removing it," A.R. Khan, a state education officer, told the newspaper.
Yeah, it’s frigging hilarious. Especially since “Rajasthan state, known for its conservative attitude towards women, has a ratio of 886 females to 1,000 males…largely attributed to high abortion rates for girls.” I read somewhere yesterday that in some parts of India, the male-to-female ratio is now almost 2:1. Another fine example of how misogyny hurts men, too—since now a whole lot of them will be left without partners.

But then again, donkeys are better than girls, anyhow.

Open Wide...

Scarborough Fare

You’ve really got to be somebody special to look across the American landscape, see the lunatic hatemongering of Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell, James Dobson, et al, and say, “You know what? I think I can take it a step further.” And Dr. Rick Scarborough is just that special kind of guy.

The founder of Vision America, which organized the War on Christians Conference, and author of Liberalism Kills Kids, Scarborough gave Tom DeLay one last delicious blowjob today, praising him as “a man of courage and commitment.”

"More than anyone in Washington, Tom DeLay fought our battles -- to end the horror of abortion, preserve the sanctity of marriage, rein-in a runaway judiciary and keep America one nation under God. We would be ingrates indeed if we did not take this occasion to express our appreciation for the contributions of this great man," Scarborough declared…

"Heroes come and go. The cause of returning America to its Judeo-Christian roots continues."
Scarborough also noted that DeLay is only being presumed guilty because he is a conservative Christian. It has nothing to do, of course, with the sordid little affair he’s been having for years with the now-convicted Jack Abramoff. (Who, by the way, is not a conservative Christian, but an Orthodox Jew.)

There seems to be a bit of a breakdown in communication over at Rightwing Noise Machine headquarters, though, because John at Blogenlust quotes Conservative Bullshit Artist Extraordinaire Hindrocket saying, sure sure, DeLay’s been railroaded by evil lefties, but the truth is, he’s been too liberal recently, anyhow.

Yes, you read that right. Tom DeLay: Too Liberal.

So, we’ve got one nutwit going on about how Tom DeLay is a liberal, and another nutwit who’s ready to canonize him, in spite of his book claiming Liberalism Kills Kids. Can Tom DeLay be both a man of courage and commitment and a liberal kid-killer?

My head is spinning. Come on, conservatives. The only thing you had worth envying was consistency of message, no matter how mind-numbingly absurd. If you lose that, you’ve lost it all.

(Crossposted at AlterNet PEEK.)

Open Wide...

"What the hell is that thing?"


Famous last words.

As many of you know, I'm a B-Movie addict. From wobbly paper plate "spaceships" in black and white, to huge, squishy monsters in glorious color, I love 'em all. Even when they're lousy. Granted, there's a difference between good bad, and bad bad, but I'm sure I don't have to explain that to you.

Like most B-Film lovers, I'm a big fan of the Sci-Fi and horror genres (horror in particular), simply because most B-Films fall into this category. So I've watched a lot of crap. A lot of crap. Horror fans have been moaning for a long time that the genre just isn't what it used to be. You've heard the complaints; "it's all flash and no substance," "the special effects were the star," etc, etc. Every time a debate begins about "why no one goes to the movies anymore," one of the most common complaints is simply this: The movies suck. (The other most common statement seems to be "Hire some fucking ushers that will shut people up so I can enjoy the movie I paid ten dollars to see," but I digress.)

I've been despairing at the current trend in horror films: Torture Horror. I don't like it. I mean, I really don't like it. I'll jump right in when fans are complaining that studios are doing another remake of The Texas Chainsaw Massacre or The Hills Have Eyes, not necessarily because they're remakes, but because my thought is, "Geez, why remake that? I didn't enjoy it the first time!"

Before some fans jump down my throat, let me just say this: I recognize that the originals of these two movies are classics, and I do think they're damn scary, exciting, good movies. I just don't find torture scary, and I'm not entertained by "let's watch this person's horrible ordeal for the next two hours." I'll take The Thing over Saw any day. But that's me; your results may vary.

Anyway, what's my point? Well, I went to the movies this weekend, and I saw Slither. And here's my recommendation:

Go see it. Right now.

Slither is more than just a throwback to the monster B-Movies of the 50's and 60's; it's a genuine return to the reason we go to the movies in the first place: to have some fun. And Slither is many things, but first and foremost, it's a gas. (Even the husband loved it, and he's got a very low tolerance for cheesy movies.)

(NOTE: I'm going to try and make this part of my rant as spoiler-free as possible, but I will be describing some scenes from the movie. If you're wanting to go into this cold, you probably want to skip down to the last paragraph.)

From the opening shot, I knew this was my kind of movie. The first thing seen is a meteor, hurtling earthward. Now, any B-Flick fan knows, nothing good can come from meteors. And this one is no exception. It's carrying a sluglike parasite that has been traveling from planet to planet, devouring the inhabitants and heading to the next. The meteor lands in the woods. We get a fast P.O.V. shot winding through the tightly-packed trees, finally slowing to focus on the much smaller meteorite steaming on the forest floor.

It splits open, revealing a gooey interior. The title of the film blazes across the screen. In my theatre, the audience cheers.

Warmed my black little heart, it did.

Slither doesn't waste much time. Within a few minutes, local businessman Grant Grant (har, har. Played by Michael Rooker) has found the huge, maggot-like creature that's oozed away from the meteorite... a disgusting grub that has a nasty surprise for Grant hidden inside its slimy body.

Grant comes home... changed. His wife knows something's different about him, although with Grant, that's not necessarily a bad thing.

The next day, Grant has sudden cravings for raw meat. He hits the grocery store, and fills the back of his pickup with beef. The town is suddenly being wallpapered with notices about missing pets. And Grant has padlocked the basement door.

That's the first fifteen minutes or so of the film.

(If, by the way, you recognized the nods to The Blob, Evil Dead, and Invasion of the Body Snatchers, in that sequence, and knew that Michael Rooker also played Henry in Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer, you must see this movie.)

Things escalate rapidly. Within a few days, the small town of Wheelsy is besieged by slime spitting-zombies, a "squid monster" that's gutting cattle, and an army of huge slugs that have a nasty habit of lunging into your mouth and burrowing into your brain.

It's gory. It's slimy. It's funny. It's got some great scares. It's filled with profanity and off-color jokes. And man, is it fun.

Does it have problems? Yes, of course. Wouldn't be a B-Movie if it didn't. But you're having such a good time while watching this movie, it won't matter in the slightest. Slither is the best horror flick I've seen since Shaun of the Dead. Do yourself a favor... grab a bunch of friends, head to your theatre and catch it before it's gone. Be entertained by your entertainment for once.

If you miss this to see the Larry the Cable Guy movie, you're dead to me.

UPDATE: Remember that scene in Raiders of the Lost Ark where an exhausted Indiana Jones simply shoots a scimitar-wielding attaker, rather than go through a big fight? There's a scene in Slither that plays with a common horror movie cliché in the same manner. See if you can spot it. I think you'll be pleasantly surprised.

(Overture, curtain, lights... this is it, we'll cross-post the heights...)

Open Wide...

Breaking News: Elton John Says “Goodbye, Tom DeLay”

This is really touching. Elton John—and who better, really?—has quickly reworked his Candle in the Wind, originally written for Marilyn Monroe and later revamped for Princess Diana, as a tribute to our fallen former House Majority Leader, Tom DeLay. Said the funky songster, “I was just heartbroken by the tragic loss of this great American hero, and also, I’m about to go bankrupt again, so show me the money, bitches. Mama needs $250,000 worth of flowers for her bungalow on the French Riviera!”

The new single won’t be released for several weeks, but one of my top secret sources has managed to get me an advance copy. It’s really special; I must admit, it brought a tear to my eye. So here it is—a Shakespeare’s Sister exclusive: Elton John’s Fart in the Wind, a tribute to Tom DeLay.

Goodbye, Tom Delay;
May you waste away in the state penn.
You are the ass who made himself
The liege of crooked men.

You really are an asshole;
Hope you enjoyed your fleeting fame.
Now you belong to Satan,
And his spunk spells out your name.

And it seems to me you lived your life ‘
Like a fart in the wind:
Ever stinking, odor lingering,
Even when rain set in.
And I really will not miss you,
Nor your loathsome slimy trail;
I wish you all that you deserve
As your dumb ass rots in jail.

Goodbye, Tom DeLay;
Though your exit was rather abrupt,
We’ll celebrate it nonetheless—
You’re such a douche and so corrupt.

And even though we try,
The truth brings us to tears;
All our words cannot express
How we despised you through the years.

And it seems to me you lived your life ‘
Like a fart in the wind:
Ever stinking, odor lingering,
Even when rain set in.
Goodbye, Tom DeLay;
We’re so glad to see you go.
We hate your vile countenance
More than you'll ever know.

Open Wide...

The Flip of a Snitch

Truthout's Jason Leopold has written a very interesting piece which updates what Raw Story's Larisa Alexandrovna reported last October. At that point, John Hannah, “a senior national security aide on loan to Vice President Dick Cheney from the offices of then-Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security Affairs, John Bolton,” was identified as a target of Fitzgerald’s probe and was said to be cooperating with the investigation. Now Leopold reports that Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald has known the identity of the Bush administration official who outed CIA operative Valerie Plame since two months after the probe began, as a result of Hannah's cooperation.

Hannah's cooperation early on in the leak investigation ultimately helped Fitzgerald and his staff discover the identity of the Bush administration official who leaked information about Plame Wilson's work with the CIA to Novak, these sources said.

The identity of the individual who leaked Plame Wilson's CIA status to Novak is still publicly unknown. No one in the White House was aware that Hannah was cooperating with the special counsel, the sources said, adding that information Hannah provided to Fitzgerald was instrumental in securing a perjury indictment against Libby. Hannah's attorney did not return numerous calls for comment.
Fitzgerald has taken his time methodically building a strong case against everyone involved, and is now, according to Leopold's sources, "preparing the paperwork to present to a grand jury outlining the charges against Rove in hopes of securing an indictment." Whether Rove will be identified as the leaker, or will be brought up on charges, similar to the previously indicted Scooter Libby, of perjury and obstruction, remains to be seen.

More from The Heretik, The Washington Note, and TalkLeft.

(Crossposted at AlterNet PEEK.)

Open Wide...

Bush is counting on your apathy; don't deliver.

After his own nauseating apathy contributed to the disaster that befell New Orleans in Katrina's aftermath, now President Bush is hoping that the rest of us are just as useless as he is, so he can save spending $6 billion instead of giving NOLA the protection it needs. About $3 billion is needed to reinforce Algiers, eastern New Orleans, the Lower 9th Ward, West Jefferson, and most of Jefferson Parish's east bank, St. Charles Parish, Belle Chasse, and Lower Coast Algiers, and about $3 billion more is needed to reinforce Plaquemines Parish. Scout Prime reports on the issue, which isn't getting the attention it deserves, just as Bush no doubt hopes.

Donald Powell who is Bush’s point man on Katrina reconstruction has said Bush is making no promises regarding the needed $6 billion…

Without levee protection residents and business will not return. It is that simple. This is a crucial time for NOLA which one could make a case has been lying out there for some time and known to the administration…

Bush is counting on the fact that people have lost interest and are not paying attention.
You know what to do. Contact your Senators and Representatives and let them know you are paying attention. And that you've also noticed there's an election this year, and if they'd like your votes, they'd better tell Bush to get off his lazy, contemptible ass and properly fund the rebuilding of NOLA.

(Crossposted at AlterNet PEEK.)

Open Wide...

Goodbye, Tom DeLay

The Hammer has hammered the final nail in his own coffin.

Via BradBlog, I see that erstwhile House Majority Leader and embattled crook Tom DeLay has announced he will not seek reelection and will be leaving Congress "within months."

"I'm going to announce tomorrow that I'm not running for reelection and that I'm going to leave Congress," DeLay, who turns 59 on Saturday, said during a 90-minute interview on Monday. "I'm very much at peace with it." He notified President Bush in the afternoon. DeLay and his wife, Christine, said they had been prepared to fight, but that he decided last Wednesday, after months of prayer and contemplation, to spare his suburban Houston district the mudfest to come. "This had become a referendum on me," he said. "So it's better for me to step aside and let it be a referendum on ideas, Republican values and what's important for this district."

…"I'm a realist. I've been around awhile. I can evaluate political situations," DeLay told TIME at his kitchen table in Sugar Land, a former sugar plantation in suburban Houston. Bluebonnets are blooming along the highways. "I feel that I could have won the race. I just felt like I didn't want to risk the seat and that I can do more on the outside of the House than I can on the inside right now. I want to continue to fight for the conservative cause. I want to continue to work for a Republican majority."

Asked if he had done anything illegal or immoral in public office, DeLay replied curtly, "No." Asked if he'd done anything immoral, he said with a laugh, "We're all sinners." Asked what he would do differently, he said, "Nothing."
Charming, as always.

Ever the evasive snake, DeLay failed to mention that his decision may have less to do with a selfless interest in fighting “for the conservative cause,” and more to do with, uh, this:

The decision came just three days after his former deputy chief of staff, Tony C. Rudy, pleaded guilty to conspiracy and corruption charges, telling federal prosecutors of a criminal enterprise being run out of DeLay's leadership offices.
Wanting to work for a Republican majority...scared stupid about what's coming next... tomato...tomahto. Whatever moves the shit through the pipes is fine by me.

Seeya, Tom.

(More from Time, WaPo, MSNBC, CNN, AP, Houston Chronicle. Crossposted at AlterNet PEEK.)

Open Wide...

Thank You

I just wanted to take a moment to say thank you on behalf of all the Shakes Contributors to everyone who has commented or emailed about our Koufax for Best Group Blog. I’ve received many nice words of congratulations and encouragement, and I can’t tell you how much I appreciate it.

I really was absolutely shocked by it. I didn’t think we had a chance, being as comparatively small as we are—I never even emailed friends or family to let them know Shakes had made the finals. To be quite honest, when I saw the link at Memeorandum yesterday that the winners were up, I had clicked through to Wampum and had copied and pasted the entire winners list into a Word document and was going through, formatting it for a post, before I noticed that we’d won. At which point, I thought, “Huh?” and I suspect I’m not the only one who had that reaction, lol.

Now that the surprise has worn off a little, I just feel really touched that so many Shakers and fellow bloggers had faith in us. I continue to be deeply grateful that we have great discussions and lots of fun every day. I am consistently proud of the content, by both the posters and commenters, but the feeling of Shakes is what I enjoy most. Thank you to everyone who stops by and contributes to making Shakes a cool blog.

And my most heartfelt appreciation to Paul the Spud, Tart, Misty, Litbrit, Waveflux, Mr. Furious, Patrick, Thesaurus Rex, Shamanic, Rana, and Mr. Shakes, for sharing this space with me. You guys rock.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

I read earlier today that the McClellatron 3000 and Treasury Secretary John Snow may be next to go at the White House, but didn’t think it was really worth mentioning until it actually happened. However, I then saw Rox’s suggested replacement for Scotty, and I had to snag it and share it, because it made me snort.


Arf.

Brilliant.

Who do you think would make a good replacement for the McClellatron 3000?

Remember, they have to be at least this good:

Open Wide...

Photo Dump: Adventures of Georgie

After being under the weather for so much of last week, I feel as though it’s been far too long since I last caught up with what’s been happening with Georgie. So just what has that rapscallion gotten up to lately?

Made funny faces…



Looked uncomfortable touching a black man…



Played the “Guess What Giant Word Is Behind Your Back” game;
he guessed “tyranny”—so close…



Wandered around looking like a doofus…



Closed on a new summer home in Mexico…



Went on Jeopardy: World Leaders Week—and lost;
but in fairness, the Final Jeopardy question was a tough one:
“This former CIA chief was the 41st president of the United States”…



Got a new costume…



And pulled a neck muscle…


All in all, a pretty good couple of days for Georgie.

Open Wide...

Rushbo

Still a pot of shit.

As an aside, I have absolutely no inside track on the Duke rape case, and so I, like most people, can only offer an opinion on what happened based on what I’m reading. I’m inclined to believe that this is not a false report, based on the police having found five fingernails (described elsewhere as torn-off nails) at the residence after a search warrant was executed, and the alleged victim’s father’s description of her physical appearance, which I am assuming is true, since it could so easily be disproved but hasn’t been. Those are my thoughts at this point; I’m sure we’ll hear lots more information about this case in the future.

Open Wide...

OMG—Let it Go

The Clenis lives on—and it was tacky, too!

Drudge is reporting that a new book called Laura Bush: An Intimate Portrait reveals that the current First Lady was “appalled at the way the Clintons left the White House and Hillary Clinton's gaudy, outdated taste in decorating.”

On December 18, 2000, just after the Supreme Court ruled on the election, Hillary Clinton gave Laura Bush a tour of the White House. The incoming-First Lady was dismayed at what she saw: Not only were carpets and furnishings fraying and in disrepair in the West Wing and public areas, the Oval Office was done in loud colors—red, blue, and gold! The East Wing was cut up into small offices and had exposed electrical conduits. Many of the furnishings looked dated.

Laura Bush noted how the Lincoln Bedroom looked worn out.
Whatfuckingever. This is a total retread of the roundly discredited meme about which the wingers were bloviating soon after Bush took office—that the Clintons had “trashed” the White House. But let’s just say, just for shits and giggles, that it’s true. Maybe Hillary Clinton had better things to do than design optimistic rugs. Maybe the Clintons thought there were better things to spend taxpayer money on than prettying up the White House. Maybe Laura Bush is just a stupid bitch!

Ahem.

Open Wide...

Maru Raises a Very Good Question

Bush’s Sorry Legacy:

From a letter to the editor of Stars and Stripes: Bunnypants 'worst president ever.'

Bush’s policy of touting peace and democracy while dropping bombs on oil-producing countries and promoting crony capitalism in an America deteriorating into a feudal backwater will be Bush’s legacy as the worst president in U.S. history.
Why do our troops hate America?
Yeah! Dumb troops.

Open Wide...

Excellent, Smithers

The Simpsons Movie…coming in just over a year to a theater near you!

Open Wide...

Ha

Pam catches up with Mr. Hetero.

Open Wide...

Violence Against Women Emerging as Important 2006 Election Issue

Lifetime Networks, as part of their new “Our Lifetime Commitment: Stop Violence Against Women” Campaign and in conjunction with National Sexual Assault Awareness Month, commissioned Roper Poll to undertake “the largest women's multi-platform research project ever undertaken by a television network”—the Lifetime Women's Pulse Poll. It covered a variety of issues, from politics to pop culture, and one of the most interesting results is that voters are citing violence against women as an important midterm election issue.

Violence Against Women Is Seen as Key Election Issue: Nearly all women (97 percent) feel that the issue of domestic violence and sexual assault against women and girls is important and will impact who they vote for in the 2006 mid-term elections.

Violence Against Women of Equal or Greater Importance to Voters than Expected Top Issues Like Homeland Security, Jobs and the Economy, the War in Iraq and the Environment: Nearly eight out of ten (77 percent) women and men said that preventing violence against women was of paramount importance to them as an election issue - more so than or on par with issues that receive much greater attention such as jobs and the economy (79 percent), health care (79 percent), education (80 percent), homeland security (68 percent), the war in Iraq (65 percent) and the environment (63 percent).
To be quite honest, I find that rather surprising. Pleasantly surprising, but definitely unexpected. Some of the other findings are instrumental in providing context.

Violence Against Women Perceived as an Increasing Problem: Six out of ten (59 percent) Americans feel violence against women is worse today than it was ten years ago. Sixty-one percent personally know a woman who has been the victim of violence.
And this is very encouraging:
Americans Are Starting to Take Action: Three in four parents (73 percent) say they have explicitly talked to their children about violence against women being wrong. Among those who knew a friend or family member was being abused, an overwhelming 87 percent said to have intervened in some way to help the victim, including reaching out beyond their immediate circle to police (46 percent), local shelters (35 percent), the internet (28 percent) and hotlines (24 percent).
It’s also informative. If 87% of people—both women and men—are intervening to help victims, it’s no wonder that so many people are interested in seeing their elected representatives get involved in this issue, too. Are you listening, Dems?

"As we head to Washington, D.C., for the fifth year-in-a-row, we are encouraged that this poll suggests that violence against women is top of mind and that women and men are taking action to stop it," said Meredith Wagner, Executive Vice President, Public Affairs, Lifetime Entertainment Services.
Violence against women is one of those issues to which there’s no drawback in supporting it passionately. It’s not controversial to champion protecting women from violence and sexual assault, by which they are disproportionately victimized. And, clearly, it’s an issue of concern to lots of voters. Sometimes issues like this aren’t given lots of attention, because they’re not controversial—Duh, nobody’s for violence against women, so what’s the point of making a big point of saying how you’re against it? But that’s the wrong attitude for two reasons. First of all, there are people who are for violence against women: the perpetrators of violence. Acting as though it’s a non-issue ignores the reality that there are a lot of people who don’t share the conventional wisdom that hurting and exploiting women is wrong. Secondly, being a vocal advocate on an issue like this is concrete evidence of a genuine concern, and when no one’s really talking about it with regularity, it gives the person who speaks up the ability to lead the conversation.

If the Dems made “Stop Violence Against Women” an integral part of their platform, it would be up to the GOP to say “Me, too!” for a change. It’s smart politics—and compassionate politics to boot.

And it would fit in quite nicely with a Pro-Woman platform plank that also encompassed issues like reproductive choice, birth control access, workplace equality, etc.—a plank that’s altogether absent from the Dems’ current 6-point midterm issue list.

Open Wide...

You Can’t Make This Stuff Up

Actual Press Release: RNC Chairman Ken Mehlman to Address The Booker T. Washington Celebration Banquet

Actual Address: The Sheraton Crystal City Hotel, 1800 Jefferson Davis Highway

Open Wide...

Gore Goes After Bush

Ouch:

George W. Bush as Neville Chamberlain?

That's the comparison Al Gore makes in Vanity Fair's environmentally correct "Green Issue."

The former veep — President Bush's 2000 election opponent — keeps insisting that he has no intention of running again for the White House.

But that hasn't stopped him from writing a gasket-blowing polemic arguing that by refusing to face up to the threat of global warming, Bush is just like the disgraced British prime minister who appeased the Nazis before World War II.

"Where there is no vision, the people perish," Gore writes, quoting the Bible to bash Bush.

Warning that Bush and the Republican Congress have displayed "a blinding lack of awareness" about "the worst catastrophe in the history of human civilization" — global warming — Gore also blames the incumbent for ignoring the threat of 9/11.

Bush "was warned on Aug. 6, 2001, of an attack by Al Qaeda. 'Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US,' said the intelligence community in a message so important that it was the headline of the President's daily briefing that day, five weeks before the attacks," Gore seethes.

"Didn't he see that clear warning?" asks Gore. "Why were no questions asked, meetings called, evidence marshaled, clarifications sought?"

As for Bush's slow response to Hurricane Katrina, "Once again an urgent warning was ignored. The videotapes of one session make clear that the President heard the warnings but, again, asked not a single question."

Americans are finally acknowledging "that Katrina, as horrible as it was, may have been the first sip of a bitter cup which will be proffered to us over and over again," Gore rants.
Like Gore or not, every progressive had better hope that he does run for president in 08. That he doesn’t currently hold office gives him the latitude, the freedom, to say things that candidates who still have to worry about a political career will never risk saying. He has the potential to be Al Sharpton with more credibility—and best of all, he knows it.

Open Wide...

Congratulations to the Koufax Award Winners

And the Sandys go to

Best Blog -- Non Professional
Crooks & Liars

Best Blog -- Professional or Sponsored
Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memo

Best Blog Community
Daily Kos

Most Deserving of Wider Recognition
Echidne of the Snakes

Best New Blog
Glenn Greenwald of Unclaimed Territory

Best Writing
Digby of Hullabaloo

Best Single Issue Blog
Jordan Barab of Confined Space

Best Expert Blog
Pharyngula by P.Z. Myers

Best Group Blog
Shakespeare's Sister

Best Post
Bag News Notes for Katrina Aftermath: And Then I Saw These

Best Series
FireDogLake for Plame coverage

Most Humorous Blog
Jesus' General

Most Humorous Post
Dood Abides for The Wizard of Oil

Best State or Local Blog
Bluegrass Report and Tennessee Guerilla Women

Best Commenter
Georgia10

I’m, um, hugely stunned. Thanks very much to everyone who voted for us!

And thanks to Wampum for all the amazing work they do on this every year.

Open Wide...