I’m liking Feingold more and more.

In an AP article discussing the split between establishment Dems and the Democratic base over Feingold’s censure resolution (two Senators are in support of Feingold—Harkin and Boxer—while a Newsweek poll found that 60% of Democrats support the resolution), Feingold makes a very important point in response to the array of elected Dems and Dem strategists who have asserted his action will help energize Republicans:


"These Democratic pundits are all scared of the Republican base getting energized, but they're willing to pay the price of not energizing the Democratic base," he said. "It's an overly defensive and meek approach to politics."
Snap!

Mr. Feingold, I present you with the first ever Shakespeare’s Sister Golden Balls Award.


Go forth, and spread your message of ballsiness across the land, sir.

Open Wide...

Important Announcement

V for Vendetta rocks. That is all.

Open Wide...

Idea Thieves

Interesting piece from Larisa at HuffPo about blogs, the MSM, and plagiarism.

On March 14, 2006, the AP did their own article, left out any attribution to me or my publication and lifted not only my research but also whole sections of my article for their own (making cosmetic changes of course).

We contacted an AP senior editor and ombudsmen both and both admitted to having had the article passed on to them, and both stated that they viewed us as a blog and because we were a blog, they did not need to credit us. What we are or are not is frankly irrelevant. What is relevant is that by using a term like blog to somehow excuse plagiarism, the mainstream press continues to lower the bar for acceptable behavior. It need not matter where the AP got the information, research, and actual wording from. What matters is that if they use it in part or in whole, they must attribute properly. A blog or a small press publication or grads students working in the corner of a library all equally deserve credit for their work, period.
Check it out.

Open Wide...

News from Shakes Manor: On the Road Edition

Mr. Shakes has a tendency to babble. I was once talking about this with my friend Sam, telling him that Mr. Shakes babbles nonsense at me 23 out of 24 hours of the day, and he kind of laughed and said he’d like to hear Mr. Shakes’ description of it. I said, “Oh, no—you think I’m doing one of those ‘wife’ things where everything her husband says is nonsense, but I’m telling you…he genuinely babbles utter nonsense at me constantly, like ‘Shushtelled, woman. Be shushed or I’ll have you beaten up!’ when I’m not even talking. He'd quite plainly admit that he is a compulsive nonsense babbler.” When I told Mr. Shakes about this exchange later, he agreed.

The babbling ensues most frequently when Mr. Shakes is extremely tired or very excited about something. Car trips seem to bring it on as well. We either have a passionate discussion about something quite interesting, or I get the babbling. Today was not a day for an interesting conversation.

Waiting at a light behind a Dodge Durango:

Mr. Shakes: Doodge Durangoo. They’re doodgin’ durangoos. What’s a durangoo, anyway? They ooght to joost call it the Doodge Turdo.

Shakes: Mmph.

Mr. Shakes: Dooge Turdo!

Shakes: Stop babbling.

Mr. Shakes: Here we go—we’re turning left now! Turning left!

Shakes: Sigh.

Then Mr. Shakes broke into his favorite song.

She’s short!
She’s round!
She bounces on the ground!
Melissa McEwan!
Melissa McEwan!

Short and cute and round!
Round and short and cute!
Cute and round and short!
Short and cute and round round round!

Shakes: Hahahaha, omigod. [Still funny, though I've heard it no fewer than ten thousand times.]

Mr. Shakes: You know what happens to short round cute people?

Shakes: What?

Mr. Shakes: They marry crazy Scotsmen.

Indeed we do.

[Mr. Shakes just read this and said, “Good loord, people are gooing to think I’m mad!” (He is.) I said, “You should be happy you have a wife who thinks your madness is adorable.” He replied, “I am. I just wish my adorability didn’t constitute a form of insanity so severe that it verges upon the committable.”]

Open Wide...

Bill James is back.

Lucky us.

My favorite of the lines he likes to employ in his battle against LGBT tolerance is “Perversity is not diversity.” It’s so catchy.

Here’s one for him: Bill James is a cockwanking assmonkey.

Hmm. That’s not as catchy. I’ll have to work on it.

Open Wide...

The War on Easter

I kid you not.

Already, many stores and malls across the U.S. are preparing for seasonal events, with some refraining from usage of terms like "the Easter Bunny," opting instead for more generic terms like "Spring Bunny," or other names avoiding the name "Easter."

One such location is the Somerset Collection, an upscale mall in Troy, Mich., serving 14 million shoppers per year. It's now publicizing an event with its "Spring Bunny" and Walt Disney's Winnie the Pooh.

The event caught the attention of WorldNetDaily reader Tim Edwards, who says, "It appears that this very important Christian holiday is under assault just like Christmas is."
Not to get all “rational” about it or anything, but separating a pagan image of the spring equinox—the rabbit—from the word “Easter,” referencing a Christian holiday, could, conceivably, be a good thing from a genuine Christian perspective. But then again, if Easter is all about Jesus and not about buying lots of Easter eggs and fancy new dresses, that tends to undermine America’s real religion—capitalism.

The hat tip for the story goes to Pam, but Echidne had the idea for a War on Easter first. Of course, she was kidding.

As for me, I’m just declaring a war on Peeps, which I think are the foulest little bits of pseudo-edible material on the planet.

My War on Easter ended circa 1983, when I fought Easter…and Easter won.


Shakes Sis stars in:
The Bonnet That Ate My Brain

Open Wide...

McCain’s at it again.

Crypto-antimaverick McCain just keeps giving and giving.

After hiring Terry Nelson as an advisor, a bloke who was last seen aiding and abetting Tom DeLay’s money-funneling machinations, McCain appeared on a Seattle radio show where a caller questioned his decision, saying, “For a reformer, I'm kind of curious why he would hire a guy like Terry Nelson as a senior advisor… I'm curious why would you hire someone with such a shady background?”

And then the fun began.

MCCAIN: None of those charges are true.

CALLER: You don't believe what was actually written in the indictment from Texas?

MCCAIN: No.

CARLSON: All right.

[nervous laughter]

MCCAIN: I will check it out. But I've never heard of such a thing. I know that he was a grassroots organizer for President Bush year 2000 and 2004, and had a very important job in the Bush campaign as late as 2004, but the other charges I will go and look and see if any of them are true, but I've never heard of them before.
That’s the way to not look like an asshole—immediately deny that charges you later admit you’ve never heard of aren’t true. Well played, Captain Clever.

(Hat tip to Think Progress. Crossposted at Ezra’s place.)

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Think Progress:

Blasting those who have called Bush incompetent, Vice President Cheney said today, “If they are competent to fight this war, then I ought to be singing on American Idol.”
So…what song should be Cheney’s opening number? I’m thinking AC/DC’s Big Gun.

Open Wide...

What a difference a day makes.

Suddenly, DittoBoy has become contrite over at RedState:

I want to apologize to National Review Online, my friends and colleagues here at RedState, and to any others that have been affected over the past few days. I also want to apologize to my previous editors and writers whose work I used inappropriately and without attribution. There is no excuse for this - nor is there an excuse for any obfuscation in my earlier statement.

I hope that nothing I've done as a teenager or in my professional life will reflect badly on the movement and principles I believe in.

I'm deeply grateful for the love and encouragment [sic] of all those around me. And although I may not deserve such support, it makes it that much more humbling at a time like this. I'm a young man, and I hope that in time that I can earn a measure of the respect that you have given me.

Regards,
Ben
I don’t imagine, however, that this is part of a newfound conscientiousness. I imagine, instead, it has something to do with the National Review Online being decidedly unimpressed with having their reputation (such as it is) tarred alone with his, and throwing the little shit to the wolves by pulling out all the incidences they could find of his plagiarism while writing for them:

As we mentioned in our earlier editor's note, staff here at National Review Online are going through all of the pieces Ben Domenech has written for us (the most recent of which appears to have been published in 2002) in light of questions raised in the wake of the debut of his "Red America" blog this week on the Washington Post's website (from which he has since resigned).

Our review unfortunately raises questions about several other pieces besides the one we apologized for this morning…

Put alongside other pieces that we're looking at and that have been linked to elsewhere in the blogosphere, it's hard not to conclude there was something amiss.

We're still looking. And again apologize to our readers that this ever happened on our site.
So, now that the NRO is themselves compiling examples of DittoBoy’s flagrant theft, I wonder if the dicks over at RedState will stop writing crap like this:

Putting aside the charge for which Ben has been pilloried and you're left with is a particular group of critics. Unlike Ben, there is far less hope for their redemption. You see - before they settled on the attacks on his writing - they spent three days proving that they are the lowest of the low…
Yes, it’s all the dirty liberals’ fault. We’re so contemptuous. It isn’t the wanton thief who’s despicable; it’s the people who uncovered his thieving. Spare me.

(Links via Memeorandum.)

Open Wide...

rock the vote!

Koufax voting ends tomorrow at 11:59 PM (EST). From Wampum:

You can either vote in comments or send in your votes (cut and paste ballot here) to wampum @ nic-naa.net (remove spaces) with "Koufax" in the subject line.


Shakes Sis is up for Best Group Blog.

Open Wide...

Random Snark/Vent Thread: Conservatives Edition

What's your best sassy slogan for movement conservatives?

E.g. Conserving Ethics: We don't use them so there's plenty left over for you.

Open Wide...

RIP Ben, Patron Saint of Truth, Martyr on the Altar of Editors, Killed by Vicious Liberal Lions

Blogenfreude’s head is going to explode if he doesn’t get some snark about Ben Domenech’s swan song at RedState, and I am nothing if not accommodating of the near-exploding.

The hate mail that I have received since the launch of this blog has been overwhelmingly profane and violent. My family has been threatened; my friends have been deluged; my phone has been prank called. The most recent email that showed up while writing this post talked about how the author would like to hack off my head, and wishes my mother had aborted me.
Dude, join the fucking club. In fact, try being a feminist progressive blogger for awhile (who, by the way, doesn’t even have a slot in a national newspaper) and see if there aren’t wackos who send you all kinds of crazy shit. Comes with the territory, Big Boy. Deal.

In fact, you might try having a good laugh about it. That is, if you can manage to find your sense of humor buried under all that self-pity. It’s probably somewhere near your social conscious, unless that’s already been totally obliterated by the crushing weight of your feelings of entitlement.

While I am not a journalist, I have, myself, written more than one thing that has been plagiarized in the past. But these charges have also served to create an atmosphere where no matter what is said on my Red America blog, leftists will focus on things with my byline from when I was a teenager.
Oh, somebody call the waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhmbulance! The horror that mean old horrible “leftists” actually dug out things you published in college. It’s not exactly like they raided the defunct MySpace page of a then-14-year-old. “He said Star Wars ‘is a wild ride,’ and everyone knows Peter Travers said that in the 70s!” Please.

But while the folks at washingtonpost.com understand my position and are convinced by my arguments on many of these issues, they also feel that the firestorm here will only serve to damage us all, and that there is no way this blog can continue without being permanently tagged to this firestorm. Therefore, I have resigned this position with washingtonpost.com.
Yeah, well, shit stinks, and the smell tends to linger.

To my friends: thank you for your support.
And I promise to buy you guys some wetnaps to clean up that egg all over your faces.

To my enemies: I take enormous solace in the fact that you spent this week bashing me, instead of America.
Aww. You’re welcome, dear.

The majority of the piece is understandably dedicated, however, to the charges of plagiarism.

I can rebut several of the alleged incidents here.
Which he goes on to do, asserting that it was everyone’s fault but his. Once again, a fine example of a devotee of The Ownership Society who accepts no ownership whatsoever for anything. And, you know what? Any of the incidents he addresses, taken alone, might seem reasonable, but when someone seems to have plagiarized multiple articles in multiple places, that seems to form what we like to call “a pattern.” He whines that everything happened so long ago that he has no notes to prove his case, so it’s his word against the Big Bad Liberals. Well, buddy—one time, and I might have had some sympathy, but when there’s smoke coming from every place at which your quill has ever been in service, I start to suspect you might not just be a plagiarist, but an arsonist, too.

I’m reminded of the scene in Shattered Glass when Glass’ editor starts questioning him about this story, and that story, and this story, and that story, and the stories that need explaining just pile up so high that they obscure any possibility of a reasonable expectation. I once wrote, “We used to have a healthy mistrust of our government; we assumed that the flaws of humankind weren’t checked at the doorways of the White House and the Pentagon. When the shit hit the fan, we assumed that the people involved might do less than ethical things in the pursuit of self-preservation. Now to suggest such a thing is to be deemed a paranoiac. It is as though we have been asked, and, inexplicably, collectively agreed, to rid ourselves of common sense and our very understanding of human nature.” DittoBoy seems to be relying on the same principle: Give me the benefit of the doubt against all logic and reason. No.

Buh-bye, Benny.

Open Wide...

…and we all lived happily ever after!

MyDD’s Matt Stoller weighs in with The Moral of Box Turtle Ben: Don't Appease the Right-wing.

So Ben's resigned. What is the moral of the story? …

Journalists and editors should no longer appease the right-wing. It doesn't matter if it's hiring Ben Domenech or listening as Bush tries to convince you of the link between 9/11 and Al Qaeda or that Iraq is now named 'flowers and candy land', journalists should no longer listen to the right-wing. Ken Mehlman's statements about Russ Feingold wanting to surrender to terrorists are no longer part of your story. Period. The idea that the media is hiding the good news in Iraq is not a story. Period.

Do not appease the right-wing. When you do, and when you treat the conservative movement as if they are a legitimate source of information, you end up with WMDs in Iraq, 9/11 linked to Saddam, or on a small scale, an unethical racist trashing the brand of the Washington Post and the career of Jim Brady.

Stop appeasing the right-wing. It's bad for you.
And, ya know, for the rest of us.

This, my friends, this story of the youngest Bush appointee ever, son a Bush appointee, co-founder of blog-cum-527 RedState.com, a home-schooled and self-identified fundamentalist Christian conservative…

…this story of a man whose intolerance (and overt racism) as a blogger did not preclude his being revered as a carrier of the conservative torch…

…this story of his rise to infamy as a conservative blogger at the paper that (sigh) exposed Watergate, only to be revealed as a plagiarist…

…this story of his eventual, far-too-slow resignation, making his feckless (and, apparently, catastrophically disinterred in vetting) WaPo editors and foolish compatriots at RedState look like utter tools…

…this story, Shakers, is the story which answers the question: How many times does a movement conservative have to stumble spectacularly into an inexorable freefall of disrepute before we no longer have to issue the caveat that not all movement conservatives are bad?

The answer is: No more. Not one more bloody time.

Before I continue, let me carefully note I am speaking of movement conservatives—those in either political or religious leadership positions who craft the message and lead the way from a position of unfettered access to power and funding, along with their shills in the media who disseminate the message uncritically, weathering the inevitable (and accurate) accusations of hypocrisy, avarice, and malfeasance that adherence to the message necessitates. I’m not speaking, specifically, of their legions of voters; to be sure, many of them are just as corrupt and abhorrent for the same reasons, but many of them are just ignorant or daft but generally decent, if misguided, people. I’m talking about the ringleaders of this three-ring circus, and I’m absolutely, positively done with pretending there’s a good man or woman among them. Not a single soul has to fall into yet another ethical quagmire of his or her own making to convince me that they are thoroughly contemptible, every last one.

I have watched, with horrified awe, as they rush to defend the likes of Ben Domenech as long as he is only a racist prick on a leading blog, then finally, unhurriedly, denounce him when he has breached an ethical barrier that even Karl Rove couldn’t spin. The sickening irony is that plagiarism is, perhaps, the least grievous of his transgressions.

All of them—from their president to the screeching harpy Coulter to the least-trafficked of their blogosphere representatives—claims loud and wide to be a standard-bearer for moral values in America. They are devoutly religious, they tell us, and they cloak the most heinous, vicious intolerance in that Dali-drawn surrealist version of any religion found in the holy books they judiciously but selectively quote, while simultaneously hiding their aspirations of empire behind a flag over which they claim exclusive province. Yet, time after time after time, they reveal themselves to be liars, cheats, thieves—execrable excuses for leaders of any sort, no less the moral leaders they have anointed themselves and repeatedly assert to be. And those who have not been cast into the cushy conservative exile of a six-figure think tank job after a spiral from grace have vociferously defended each and every last one of them, unless and until their best efforts at casting liberals as overreacting and overreaching have failed, and their actions are, at last, indefensible.

Amongst these defenses come the cry that there are good conservatives in their ranks, and yet I suspect if I plumbed the depths of RedState, I’d find Ben Domenech defending erstwhile administration hack and waterboy Scooter Libby. Defender one day; in need of defense the next. Like dominoes, they fall, fall to their knees in shameful disgrace, willing victims of the greed, the corruption, the endemic lust for unlimited power that are all indelible marks of their movement. If they can claim they’ve never done something wrong, it’s probably just because they haven’t been caught, goes the old joke—but I’m bored with the requirement to make some dubious distinction between corrupt little pissants and those who unconditionally defend the same.

From the top to the bottom and back again, they are wholly irredeemable, and near-impossibly indistinguishable, at that. The only difference between Ben Domenech and George Bush is the ability to retroactively classify anything that might be embarrassing, might reveal their crooked, sordid deeds to the rest of the world. Unlucky Ben—his dirty little secrets are put on display. Lucky George—his are buried in folders and files in the back cabinets of dark rooms, sealed away from public consumption with a stamp that reads: Classified.

In treating the conservative movement as if they are legitimate, we have not only ended up with “WMDs in Iraq, 9/11 linked to Saddam, or on a small scale, an unethical racist trashing the brand of the Washington Post and the career of Jim Brady,” we have also ended up with the largest organized crime syndicate this country has ever seen—and they’re running everything. They are a mob of unethical swine, who almost imperceptibly vary between those willing to commit crimes and those willing to defend the criminal behavior. You don’t have to have blood on your hands for them to be dirty.

So out with all of them. They have repeatedly discredited themselves, repeatedly shown themselves to be vile miscreants with absolutely nothing of value to offer America or the American people. I’m done pretending there’s anything, even the smallest microscopic particle of substance, worth saving. There’s no baby in this bathwater. Dump it, so we can finally, at long last, start moving toward the end of this abysmal chapter and get a little bit closer to happily ever after.

Open Wide...

You Said It, Madeleine

Madeleine Albright could have stopped with the headline of her foreign policy piece in the LA Times: Good versus evil isn’t a strategy. It doesn’t get any plainer than that.

But she didn’t.

[T]he administration must stop playing solitaire while Middle East and Persian Gulf leaders play poker. Bush's "march of freedom" is not the big story in the Muslim world, where Shiite Muslims suddenly have more power than they have had in 1,000 years; it is not the big story in Lebanon, where Iran is filling the vacuum left by Syria; it is not the story among Palestinians, who voted — in Western eyes — freely, and wrongly; it is not even the big story in Iraq, where the top three factions in the recent elections were all supported by decidedly undemocratic militias.
The whole thing’s worth a read, but please be duly warned that you may be left a sobbing mess at the memory of a time when we had an intelligent and thoughtful Secretary of State working in allegiance with a president who knew where Iran was without looking at a map, as opposed to the presidouche we’ve got now who needs a map to find his own asshole, in spite of the fact his head is eternally firmly planted in it.

Open Wide...

DittoBoy Resigns

Aww, shucks:

In the past 24 hours, we learned of allegations that Ben Domenech plagiarized material that appeared under his byline in various publications prior to washingtonpost.com contracting with him to write a blog that launched Tuesday.

An investigation into these allegations was ongoing, and in the interim, Domenech has resigned, effective immediately.
Don’t worry, Ben. A little public disgrace never impedes the embrace of the conservative community. You’ll have a job at a think tank in no time.

Open Wide...

Still Mad for Furious

It’s not technically true that I met Mr. Furious just before my 16th birthday; we had been in the same places at the same time since we were toddlers, attended the same elementary and middle schools, and always had a vague notion of who the other was. But it was just before my 16th birthday that we became friends, finding in each other the geekishly like-minded misfits our respective lives were missing, and promptly becoming so inseparable that his younger brother, only a baby then and now a teenager himself, referred to us as one person when he learned to speak: “Where ‘FuriousShakes’?” It occurred to me the other day that it’s now just before my 32nd birthday, which means that half my life has been spent with Mr. F as my confidant, conspirator, and comrade. My life is better for it.

Some of these 16 years were spent as roommates, and, perhaps more importantly, they spanned the years during which we navigated the uneven path toward adulthood—a path along which I got raped, he came out, I got married and divorced young, he got kidney stones, and lots of other unfun stuff. Navigating it together made it infinitely easier, because Mr. F is the kind of friend that everyone should be fortunate enough to have. He has seen me at my absolute worst—embarrassing, shameful stuff; he has known me to be stubborn, hurtful, uncompromising, inconsiderate, irrational. He has known me to lie. Some of it was directed at him. Some of it caused huge fights. And he has, graciously, forgiven me every time, because he made our friendship worth earning his forgiveness.

He has also seen me at my best, which, in the weird way of the criminally shy, is sometimes even harder for me to fully share than my worst. But he knows my heart truly, in the way few people do—and though there’s a certain sentimentality to that which needs no exposition, it also provides for our ability to have egregious amounts of a particular variety of fun that only two very old, very close friends can have. The kind of fun that leaves one collapsed in a heap of gut-wrenching giggles, gasping for air and swearing one shall never recover.

-------------

I have rarely laughed as hard as I did on the morning I found myself, quite literally, having fallen onto the pavement in a Grand Avenue parking lot after my knees buckled from the weight of laughter. It was my first job out of college, and I’d been there a year when Mr. F graduated and I managed to finagle him a job at the same place, so we were commuting together. Every morning, he’d pick me up, and every morning, I’d inform him of the goings-on by a wee spider that had made its home in the cavity of the passenger side mirror. Every morning, he’d get increasingly pissed about this spider who would retreat behind the mirror if he tried to capture and relocate it to a hedge or the Great Beyond.

On this morning, the spider had spun a huge web, stretching from the mirror to the angled side of the windshield, and as we drove down Lake Shore Drive, Mr. F sped up, trying to take out the web with sheer velocity. It bounced and blew, but did not fall. The spider rode safe in the mirror cavity he called home. Mr. F swore and screamed at the web as we hit 60mph. “What the fuck?! Why won’t it go away?! I’m so fucking sick of this spider!”

He was genuinely angry, and I was stifling the need to laugh. A lot.

When we pulled into the parking lot, the web was still intact, and the spider had come out to stretch in the sunshine. Mr. F ran around to side of the car, determined to kill this thing once and for all. Just as the beast was nearly within his reach, it scurried away again behind the mirror. “Ahhh!” Mr. F exclaimed. I burst out laughing. He went to work flailing his arms, destroying the web like a demonic windmill. Tears began to roll from my eyes. And then the yelling began.

“The mirror is NOT a haunted mansion!” he informed the spider, his face growing red. “You have 24 hours to evacuate, or I’m GETTING THE BUG SPRAY!”

“Wahhhhhhhhhhhhh!” I cried. “Bwah ha ha ha ha ha!” I fell against the car, then slid down onto the ground, my entire body convulsed with laughter.

“It’s not funny!” he scolded me angrily. “My car is not a home for deadbeat bugs!”

He scowled at me. I started to drool as I gasped for air.

“Whatever,” he harrumphed, then stood with his hands on his hips, contemptuously watching me quiver on the pavement, until he began to grin.

-------------

We have made silly movies together, vacationed together, attended innumerable concerts together, partied together (our birthdays being only 9 days apart, we have shared quite a few birthday celebrations), done drugs together, seen thousands of films together, spent nights talking until dawn, and I have invaluable, precious memories from all of these things. And when I cast my mind backwards over 16 years in search of fond memories, I most remember the times we have laughed until we cried.

I am quick to laugh, and I have a loud laugh that carries and causes me to blush in restaurants when I realize its made people stare. Mr. F isn’t quick to burst out laughing himself, and he’s more likely to shoot off a single “Ha!” in response to something he finds funny. But there have been occasions we are both left in an absolute fit, and Tart’s post yesterday put in the mind of one of times, the very thought of which nearly ends me to this day, a decade later.

Mr. F was a film/communications major; I was a sociology and anthropology major, so we rarely had classes together. In my fourth year and his third, I was facing a sociological theory course which not only sounded tedious, but was taught by a single professor, who had a hideous reputation. (A professor we’ll call Dr. Dandruff, for what I’ll assume are obvious reasons.) I convinced Mr. F to take it with me, as one of his electives, to his chagrin and my relief, as Dr. Dandruff turned out to be worse than I had ever imagined, having the unique capacity to be both mind-numbingly boring and detestably irritating at the same time, a loathsome demeanor made further unfortunate by his near-total lack of personal hygiene. He had the annoying habit of punctuating his lectures with questions that should have been rhetorical—“What is the difference between a billiard ball and a human?”—but would bring the class to a silent standstill as he waited for an answer. (“I’d be pissed if someone hit me with a stick,” I finally muttered from the back of the class.)

Suffice it to say, Mr. F and I were not fond of this class. We sat in the back of the room, our heads knocking against the cinderblock wall, writing each other notes back and forth about boys we liked and what we’d do this weekend. It was the easiest way to pass the time, which seemed to drag on endlessly until the bell finally rang—we were in the only building on campus that still had “bells” like a high school to indicate time was up.

During a particularly dreadful session one day, Mr. F nudged me with his elbow. I shook off my stupor and looked down at his notebook, which he was holding out for me to see. He had drawn a picture of Dr. Dandruff, with his entire body replaced by a giant ass, and two dialogue bubbles, which read: “Well, I’ll be damned! I’ve got a butt for a body!”

It looked, approximately, like this:


I thought this was, perhaps, the most hilarious thing upon which I had ever laid eyes.

But in the perfect stillness of the classroom, broken only so slightly by the monotonous drone of Dr. Dandruff’s lecture, I could not burst out laughing.

I looked away, squeezing my eyes shut, tensing my lips, trying, in effect, to turn my face into a clenched fist to hold in the laugh trying so desperately to escape. I could feel my face burning red.

Mr. F nudged me.

I ignored him.

He nudged me again.

I looked.


And then it happened—the laugh I was trying so urgently to withhold began to make its getaway. It slipped out of me like air someone is trying to hold in a balloon with a pinch; a high-pitched squeal: “Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!” My gut lurched upwards, and as I held it back, the screech got louder and louder. “Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!”

Beside me, Mr. F silently began to shake.

The other students started to look around, to see from whence the strange noise came, focusing on the two red-faced gits in the back, their eyes bursting with tears.

“Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!”

“What’s that noise?” Dr. Dandruff asked.

And then it came. “Bwah ha ha ha ha ha!” Both of us. Howling.

The entire class stared at us in slack-jawed wonder as we screamed, pounding the desks with our fists and collapsing against each other weakly. And on and on we laughed until the bell finally rang.

Open Wide...

Seriously Weird

Under the subject “Good old-fashioned nightmare fuel,” Shaker Zack sent along the link to this stunning homage to the pro-life movement: a statue of Britney Spears giving birth naked on a bearskin rug. (If you click through, be warned the pictures are not particularly work-safe, in case that wasn’t evident.)

Dedication of the life-sized statue celebrates the recent birth of Spears’ baby boy, Sean, and applauds her decision of placing family before career. “A superstar at Britney’s young age having a child is rare in today’s celebrity culture.”
True, but then again, most celebrities didn’t spend the majority of their childhoods being the family’s meal ticket by prancing around onstage, likely making them feel middle-aged and burned out by the ripe old age of 24, while simultaneously having their emotional development irreparably stunted, resulting in a tragic inability to fully adjust to both adulthood and their new circumstances, including the dichotomy of a wealth of distant admirers and a dearth of unconditional love, leaving them prone to marry foolishly and have lots of babies, just to have someone to love them. That, and some snarky stuff, too, like most celebrities also don’t provoke the observation that, somewhere, a trailer is missing its trash.

”This dedication honors Britney for the rarity of her choice and bravery of her decision,” said gallery co-director, Lincoln Capla. The dedication includes materials provided by Manhattan Right To Life Committee.
Gee, what a fun exhibit.

“Monument to Pro-Life: The Birth of Sean Preston,” believed Pro-Life’s first monument to the ‘act of giving birth,’ is purportedly an idealized depiction of Britney in delivery. Natural aspects of Spears’ pregnancy, like lactiferous breasts and protruding naval, compliment a posterior view that depicts widened hips for birthing and reveals the crowning of baby Sean’s head.

The monument also acknowledges the pop-diva’s pin-up past by showing Spears seductively posed on all fours atop a bearskin rug with back arched, pelvis thrust upward, as she clutches the bear’s ears with ‘water-retentive’ hands.

“Britney provides inspiration for those struggling with the ‘right choice’,” said artist Daniel Edwards, recipient of a 2005 Bartlebooth award from London’s The Art Newspaper. “She was number one with Google last year, with good reason --- people are inspired by the beauty of a pregnant woman,” said Edwards.
Yeah—people are inspired by her pregnant beauty. That’s why she’s the top Google search. It has nothing to do with her breasts and naval when they’re not “lactiferous and protruding.” I can only hope that this guy is doing a sustained performance art piece, in which he takes the pro-life movement for the biggest ride of their lives; otherwise, he’s hugely creepy.

Zack notes:

The question is, would this be more or less disturbing if the artist was more open about his fetishes? I'm thinking less, really. I mean, if somebody's going to visualize a brain-dead popstar delivering her child like a Playboy model for her December centerfold, it would probably be a small comfort if it could just be about the sex. Making it a symbol for a movement is just- good lord.
Agreed.

An appropriate location for permanent installation of “Monument to Pro-Life” by Mother’s Day is being sought by the gallery.
Hey—I’ve got an idea:

Open Wide...

Good As You

Adoption Institute Supports Gay Parents

That sound you hear is freepers shrieking all across the country. (Bolds mine)

NEW YORK - As debate over the issue flares in several states, a major adoption institute says in a new report that it strongly supports the rights of gays and lesbians to adopt, and urges that remaining obstacles be removed.

"Laws and policies that preclude adoption by gay or lesbian parents disadvantage the tens of thousands of children mired in the foster care system who need permanent, loving homes," the Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute says in the report to be issued Friday.

It advises agencies and officials to make firm statements in support of such adoptions, forsaking a "don't ask, don't tell" approach which prompts some gays to feel their chances of adopting hinge on being discreet about their sexual orientation.
Because "D.A.D.T." has worked so well in the military.
Adoption agencies should energetically recruit gays and lesbians, including them in outreach programs and parenting panels, the institute said.

The report arrives on the heels of a nationwide poll by the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press that found public approval of gay adoption is increasing. In 1999, 57 percent of Americans opposed the practice and 38 percent approved, while the new poll found 48 percent opposed and 46 percent in favor with a margin of error of 3 percentage points.
It's so much fun to watch bigotry boomerang, isn't it?
The Donaldson study, written by Illinois State University adoption expert Jeanne Howard, acknowledges that research on gay parenting remains relatively scant.

"Still, virtually every valid study reaches the same conclusion: The children of gays and lesbians adjust positively and their families function well," the report says.
Pam has more. It's this simple, folks. For all the shrieking and wailing about gay parents being dangerous to children, the research shows the opposite to be true. There is no reason to deny the LGBT community adoption rights, other than basic bigotry. And that dog won't hunt, Monsignor.

Open Wide...

“Bush Makes Me Sick.”

Drudge and rest of the wankosphere is going apeshit about an email sent by an ABC executive. Further evidence of their liberal bias, you see.

I’d just like to take this opportunity to say to Mr. John Green of ABC: Welcome to the club.

Oh, and stop apologizing. Being made sick by Bush is evidence of your humanity.

Open Wide...

Yes, I Have a Morrissey Quote for Everything

Tonight’s Object of Wanton Moz-Quoting: New Conservative WaPo Blogger Ben Domenech

If you must write prose/poems,
The words you use should be your own;
Don't plagiarize or take on loan.
'Cause there's always someone, somewhere,
With a big nose, who knows—
And who trips you up and laughs
When you fall,
Who'll trip you up and laugh
When you fall.


— “Cemetry Gates,” The Smiths

Open Wide...