A Modicum of Perspective, Please

Two women have died after taking RU 486, so of course the anti-choice brigade is jumping all over the news, gleefully screeching about how the drug kills pregnant women.

Two Senate abortion foes, Republicans Jim DeMint of South Carolina and Tom Coburn of Oklahoma, urged passage of legislation that would suspend sales of RU-486 until the Government Accountability Office reviews how the FDA approved the pill.

"RU-486 is a deadly drug that is killing pregnant women," DeMint said. "This drug should never have been approved, and it must be suspended immediately."
It appears that they may be the result of taking the second dose of pills via vaginal insertion, which produces fewer side effects but is not recommended by the FDA, which instead instructs women to take the second dose orally. Vaginal insertion can, in rare cases, trigger sepsis, which is the suspected cause of death. Planned Parenthood has, effectively immediately, changed its policy to reflect concerns about sepsis.

These deaths are tragic, and I don’t want to minimize that at all. But a little perspective would be nice, too. Out of the approximate 560,000 times medication abortion has been done in the US, seven women have died (meanwhile, 27,000 people had died from heart attacks and strokes while taking the arthritis drug Vioxx before the FDA pulled that drug), and none of those seven deaths have been directly attributed to mifepristone. The rate of sepsis comparable to infection risks with surgical abortions and childbirth, and the US has a maternal death rate of 12 per 100,000, making pregnancy more dangerous than RU-486.

In other words, Senators DeMint and Coburn would be better off screaming instead about how pregnancy kills pregnant women.

Better yet, they could speak to some emergency room workers who remember the number of women who died of sepsis after getting unsafe, unsanitary back-alley abortions before Roe, and see if that’s actually a preferable state of affairs to continuing to provide women access to RU-486.

Open Wide...

Happy St. Patrick’s Day

Irish Prime Minister Bertie Ahern gives Bush some weed.

Ahern, calling the shamrock "a token of our esteem and the warmth of our friendship,'' hoistsed the bowl and handed it to Bush. The two stood holding the bowl and grinning for the mother of all Irish-American photo-opportunities, the U.S. and Ireland united in a wad of weeds.

"I'm proud to accept the bowl of shamrocks as a symbol of our friendship,'' Bush said.
I know these little goodwill photo ops are a necessary part of any president’s job, but honestly, sometimes it seems it’s all this dude does. Isn’t there a war on or something? Fuck.

And look at the expression on his face, for Christ's sake. What a douchebag.

Open Wide...

Charming

Senate panel to OK ANWR drilling bill by mid-May

The U.S. Senate late on Thursday approved in a close 51-49 vote a $2.8 trillion budget bill that calls for the government to raise $6 billion over 10 years in leasing fees from allowing oil companies to drill in ANWR. The revenue would be split between the federal government and the state of Alaska.

The budget bill instructs the Senate's energy panel to draft legislation to open the refuge to drilling in order to raise the required $6 billion.

Sen. Pete Domenici, the Republican chairman of the energy committee, said he will send the ANWR-opening legislation to the Senate Budget Committee by mid-May.

Republican leaders, with White House support, used budget legislation to give oil companies access to the refuge, because budget bills can't be filibustered under Senate rules.
Sneaky bastards. Why play by the rules when you can just change them?

Open Wide...

Campaign Finance and Blogs

Matt Stoller’s got a good explanation here of the difference between the two bills currently under consideration, HR 1606 and HR 4900. The basic premise is this: HR 4900, the reform bill, is bullshit, and could essentially decimate the netroots political power of the blogosphere, turning it into just another avenue of access that is closed to anyone who isn’t wealthy.

Nancy Pelosi is supporting HR 4900 (and actively fighting against HR 1606), as are a lot of other Dems. If you value your free speech in the blogosphere, get yourself up to speed on the bills, and then write to Pelosi et. al. and let them know they’re supporting the wrong one.

Open Wide...

Friday Blogrollin'

Well, Blogger still won't let me republish in total, but I think it republished enough that you'll find the following blogs now added to the blogroll, at least on the main page. Stop by and say hi to:

The Angry Fag

Climacteric Clambake

Molly Saves the Day

Viscous Lidocaine

Sister Novena’s PortaPulplit

Also a couple of new links under Pub, Pol, & Media Blogs: Anderson Cooper's 360° Blog and the Chicago Tribune's The Swamp.

Open Wide...

I know how much you like cake...


Happy Birthday to you!
Happy Birthday to you!
Happy Birthday, dear Joooooooooooooo,
Happy Birthday to you!


*MWAH*

Open Wide...

ARGH

Blogger is being a real turd, and I'm having a hard time posting.

I thought this might make for an interesting discussion, though. Thoughts?

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Suggested by Shaker Em: When/how did you first find out what gay means?

Open Wide...

Situation Normal: All Cronied Up

Bush has chosen Idaho Gov. Dirk Kempthorne to replace Gale Norton as Interior Secretary.

Think Progress notes:

In 2003, Kempthorne was rumored to be Bush’s choice to head the EPA. He didn’t end up getting the job, but Knight-Ridder wrote this analysis:

During Kempthorne’s four-and-a-half-year tenure as governor, Idaho’s pristine air has gotten dirtier, more rivers have been polluted, fewer polluters have been inspected and more toxins have contaminated the air, water and land, according to a Knight Ridder analysis of Idaho pollution data from EPA and state records.
Kempthorne has very close ties to the same industries he would oversee in the Interior Department. In his last reelection campaign, he raised $86,000 “from timber, mining and energy industries” that wanted greater access to national forests in his state:

Two of Kempthorne’s top three donors for the 2002 campaign were the Coeur D’Alene Mines Corp., which gave $13,922, and the Potlatch Corp., a forest products company, which gave $12,034, according to the non-partisan Institute on Money in State Politics.
Please resume your regularly scheduled concern for our country’s future and contempt for this lousy administration.

Open Wide...

Today’s News Photos









And one that needs no caption, except maybe, “Oh, the bitter irony”:

Open Wide...

Blech

World’s Biggest Opportunity to Make a Ghastly Glutton of Oneself Burger:

Denny's Beer Barrel Pub, in Clearfield, Pennsylvania, already had the title with a 6lb burger. But owners thought a 15-pound burger would prove an even bigger attraction, reports the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Diners who can finish the £25 burger in under five hours win £200, a T-shirt and have their name posted on the pub's wall of fame. They also get the burger for free.

"Every restaurant needs a gimmick - ours is big burgers," said Dennis Liegey III, son of the restaurant's owner. Visitors come from as far away as Australia and California just to see the 6-pounders and try to eat them.

The new burger, dubbed the Beer Barrel Belly Buster, is as big around as the inside of a car tyre. It comes with a cup and half each of mayonnaise, mustard and ketchup, a head of lettuce, two onions, three tomatoes and 25 slices of cheese.

Even if there weren’t millions of starving people in the world, that picture would still make me want to puke.

This story reminds me of a Visa commercial in heavy rotation right now which features a guy chowing down on a burger that’s bigger than his head, and every time I see it, it makes me totally nauseous. Mr. Shakes, too. And neither of us are particularly healthy nor delicate eaters, but it’s just utterly disgusting.

Open Wide...

Quote of the Day

Care of Evan Derkacz at AlterNet PEEK:

When Democratic candidate for Maryland state senate, Jamie Raskin was asked by Republican Senator Nancy Jacobs whether marriage discrimination against gay people is required by "God's Law," Raskin, under oath, replied:

"Senator, when you took your oath of office, you placed your hand on the Bible and swore to uphold the Constitution. You didn't place your hand on the Constitution and swear to uphold the Bible."
Snap!*

----------------------

*Heretofore known as the secular liberal traitor version of “Amen.”

Open Wide...

More on the Dems’ Disarray

Neb makes a good point here that follows up on my irritation that the Dems have turned any vague appearance of actually doing their jobs into a fundraising opportunity.

I got an email today from Howard Dean. You know…the chairman of the Democratic National Committee. It said some stuff about Russ Feingold's new censure bush resolution or what have you. It also said that they want me to give them money so more good things can happen…

My problem is this:

Today, I read about how no democrat sided with Feingold on his censure bill save one.
Yeah, that’s a problem. Asking for money in support of a move that the party itself isn’t supporting, because you know there’s support for it among the grassroots, is revoltingly opportunistic.

Here’s another problem. DBK and I were having a little venting session via email, and brainstorming what can be done at this point. At one point, I noted:

Check this out: In Indiana, Republican Senator Lugar is up for reelection, and he doesn't even have a Democratic challenger. The Republican Secretary of State is up for reelection, and he doesn't have a Democratic challenger (although there is a Green in the running). The Republican State Treasurer and Republican State Auditor are ineligible to seek reelection in 2006, and they don't have Democratic challengers. Just two more Republicans who will walk into office because NO ONE IS RUNNING AGAINST THEM!!!

…The Dems haven't even bothered to give me anyone to vote for.
That’s a big problem.

Open Wide...

Womenomics

AlterNet’s Joshua Holland has a great piece up today called Womenomics 101, examining not only the work and pay disparities between women and men in America, but between America and the rest of the world.

The good news:

The American workforce has one of the highest rates of female participation in the world…

And women are a big part of that entrepreneurial class that we worship in this country. According to the Center for Policy Alternatives (PDF), one in four Americans now work for women-owned businesses; those firms grew at twice the rate of all new businesses between 1997 and 2002. It's part of our national edge -- American women start up almost five times as many new businesses as women in other high-income countries (PDF).
The bad news…well, there’s lots of bad news, unfortunately, but here’s one of the worst bits:

According to Harvard's Project on Global Working Families (PDF), the United States is one of only five countries out of 168 studied that doesn't mandate some form of paid maternal leave. The only other advanced economy among those five was Australia's, where women are guaranteed an entire year of unpaid leave. That puts the U.S. -- the wealthiest nation on the planet -- in the company of Lesotho, Papua New Guinea, and Swaziland.
Holland notes that “Putting all these pieces together, you get a picture that puts the lie to the right's claim on ‘family values,’” and that’s a very astute observation not only because of its political angle, but because it correctly identifies women’s issues as affecting more than just women. Women’s issues affect families.

One of the key tenets of feminism that its critics always seem to miss is that the issues which concern us are not just about women. When women lack equal pay and job protections, that affects their partners and children, too. When women are denied reproductive choice, that affects men who will become fathers against their wills, too. We fight for women’s equality because it makes our society stronger and all its members better off.

Open Wide...

Oklahoma is Not OK

Check out this bullshit:

Books for children about gay families will have to be removed from the kids' sections of public libraries under legislation passed Wednesday night by the Oklahoma House.

The bill allows the state to withhold funding from local libraries that don't restrict children's access to reading material with sexually explicit or gay themes.
Sexually explicit or gay. The implication, of course, is that being gay isn’t just about same-sex attraction, but about a whole deviant “lifestyle” to which no part of it children should ever be exposed, revolving as it does around a fiendish hypersexuality.

Think that’s hyperbole? Think again.

The author of the legislation Rep. Sally Kern (R-Oklahoma City) said that children need to be protected from sexually explicit material that "is turning young people into sex machines."

…Lawmakers specifically criticized "King & King," "Daddy's Roommate," "The Duke Who Outlawed Jelly Beans" and "Heather Has Two Mommies."

The LGBT-themed books are geared to children's reading levels - from just learning to read to about age 12.
Gay themes will turn kids into sex machines. Gay themes like kids who are part of gay families.

In good news, the bill will likely be defeated in the State Senate. As well it should be.

Anti-gay crusaders are so fucked in the head. They think every gay person is a rampaging sex predator, preying on children to convert them to their unnatural lifestyle during the brief interludes between engaging in anonymous, loveless sex with hoards of strangers. Yeah, there are some gay sluts—and there are plenty of straight sluts, too, which the homobigots conveniently ignore, since it might undermine the premise that sexuality is a human issue, not a straight or gay one. And they patently refuse to believe that gays are exactly as boring as the rest of us, with stupid jobs and maxed-out credit cards and mortgages and, if they’re lucky, regular sex that’s still pretty hot with a partner with whom they’ve approximated a marriage. Maybe the anti-gay brigade ought to try talking to some gay people, if they can find the time in their busy schedules of legislating ridiculous bills in response to the strawgays they so desperately fear and despise.

Open Wide...

Poor people shouldn't have sex

The Republicans of the Missouri General Assembly, big fans of the old adage that the rich get richer and the poor get children, will make sure of the latter by withholding contraceptives at county clinics. It's high moralism from the heartland:

An attempt to resume state spending on birth control got shot down Wednesday by House members who argued it would have amounted to an endorsement of promiscuous lifestyles. [...]

The House voted 96-59 to delete the funding for contraception and infertility treatments after Rep. Susan Phillips told lawmakers that anti-abortion groups such as Missouri Right to Life were opposed to the spending.

"If you hand out contraception to single women, we're saying promiscuity is OK as a state, and I am not in support of that," Phillips, R-Kansas City, said in an interview.

Apparently, Missouri Republicans so hate the idea of poor people having sex, and is so anxious to punish them for it, that they don't care about the inevitable consequences:

Others, including some lawmakers who described themselves as "pro-life," said it was illogical for anti-abortion lawmakers to deny money for contraception to low-income people who use public health clinics.

"It's going to have the opposite effect of what the intention is, which will be more unwanted pregnancies and more abortions," said Rep. Kate Meiners, D-Kansas City.

The other alternative is for low-income women to give birth to more children, which is only likely to drive up the state's costs to provide services to them, said Democratic Rep. Melba Curls, also of Kansas City.

Missourians whose thinking is not yet crippled by raging moralism will have to look to the Missouri Senate to apply some reason to this situation.

(Ex cross-post facto...)

Open Wide...

National Security Strategy: Deeply Scary, Deeply Dishonest

In a 49-page national security report, Bush has “reaffirmed his strike-first policy against terrorists and enemy nations on Thursday and said Iran may pose the biggest challenge for America.”

[D]iplomacy is the U.S. preference in halting the spread of nuclear and other heinous weapons.

"If necessary, however, under long-standing principles of self defense, we do not rule out the use of force before attacks occur — even if uncertainty remains as to the time and place of the enemy's attack," Bush wrote…

The latest report makes it clear Bush hasn't changed his mind, even though no weapons of mass destruction were found in Iraq.

"When the consequences of an attack with weapons of mass destruction are potentially so devastating, we cannot afford to stand idly by as grave dangers materialize. ... The place of pre-emption in our national security strategy remains the same," Bush wrote.

The report had harsh words for Iran. It accused the regime of supporting terrorists, threatening Israel and disrupting democratic reform in Iraq. Bush said diplomacy to halt Tehran's suspected nuclear weapons work must prevail to avert a conflict.
I’d feel a lot less nervous (and pissed and fed up) about this if I didn’t know that the Bush administration, with help from their complicit enabler the Blair administration, deliberately circumvented any possible diplomatic resolution with Iraq. It would serve us well to remember that one of the most damning revelations of the Downing Street Memos was that the process of going to the UN was a sham for Blair’s sake and that disarmament was not an option; regime change—war—was always the singular goal.

There’s no reason on earth to trust that Bush will not do the same thing again. If it’s war he wants, war he’ll get. And he’ll sell its urgency and inevitability the same way—by asserting that diplomacy has failed.

Open Wide...

well this is interesting

Seems Henry Waxman has caught Shrub red-handed--red penned?--and warned him that the "implications are serious". (*cue ominous music*)

Via RawStory:

Representative Henry Waxman (D-CA) has alleged in a letter to White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card that President Bush signed a version of the Budget Reconciliation Act that, in effect, did not pass the House of Representatives.

Further, Waxman says there is reason to believe that the Speaker of the House called President Bush before he signed the law, and alerted him that the version he was about to sign differed from the one that actually passed the House. If true, this would put the President in willful violation of the U.S. Constitution.


Oh my. Henry is none-too-impressed in his letter to Andy Card. Excerpts:

Dear Mr. Card:

On February 8, 2006, President Bush signed into law a version of the Deficit Reduction Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 2005 that was different in substance from the version that passed the U.S. House of Representatives. Legal scholars have advised me that the substantive differences between the versions - which involve $2 billion in federal spending - mean that this bill did not meet the fundamental constitutional requirement that both Houses of Congress must pass any legislation signed into law by the President.

[...]

I understand that a call was made to the White House before the legislation was signed by the President advising the White House of the differences between the bills and seeking advice about how to proceed. My understanding is that the call was made either by the Speaker of the House to the President or by the senior staff of the Speaker to the senior staff of the President.

I would like to know whether my understanding is correct. If it is, the implications are serious.

[...]

The Presentment Clause of the U.S. Constitution states that before a bill can become law, it must be passed by both Houses of Congress.[3] When the President took the oath of office, he swore to "preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States," which includes the Presentment Clause. If the President signed the Reconciliation Act knowing its constitutional infirmity, he would in effect be placing himself above the Constitution.

[...]


Henry goes on to state that everyone will "need a straightforward explanation of what the President and his staff knew". Did you laugh when you read that like I did? Yeah, right. What are the chances of that? I guess we shall see if anything comes of this and just how quickly Scotty McRobot will brush it away at the next press conference.

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Mr. Shakes and I are often implored to tell the story of how we met, since it is a bit unusual (though increasingly less so), and friends who know the camping story below often request that it we tell it in groups where there are people we've just met. (That and The Story of the Lost Engagment Ring, which I'll save for another time.)

And each time I was introduced to one of Mr. Shakes' friends for the first time, I was regaled with two sets of stories: 1) Drunken Exploits; 2) Important Things Mr. Shakes Has Lost.

Mr. Shakes, meanwhile, has heard variations of the "Melissa-Barely-Spoke-Until-She-Was-14" Story from all of my old friends, and the "There's Something on Your Butt" Story, about my creepiest coworker ever, about a thousand times.

Is there a story that you're always asked to tell about yourself by family and friends, or that they like to tell about you?

Open Wide...

News from Shakes Manor: Anniversary Edition

Mr. Shakes and I met online five years ago today. It was so random; it would be like someone having emailed you a link to Shakes and then your striking up a conversation with someone in comments, and then, you know, within a couple of months, completely rearranging your lives on two continents so that you could hang out for the rest of your lives.

We met on the Ides of March, and by May, my 10-day annual trip to Britain which I had planned for August had already been turned into a jam-packed itinerary of traveling about together, including a several-day camping trip in the Highlands, where Mr. Shakes regularly mountain-biked with his mates.

Back then, I had a habit of keeping copies of all my online correspondence. (I’m regularly harassed for being unsentimental by family and friends, but the one thing about which I am rather sentimental is correspondence; I have a massive box filled with folded notes that my oldest girlfriend and I passed back and forth in classes starting at age 11, and I could never bear to part with it. I also have a box filled with hundreds of printed emails from my dear friend Andy in London, some of them saved because of one line that made me laugh, or an interesting thought I couldn’t bear to simply delete.) Now, I’m not such a saver of letters and emails and things, mainly because I’d run out of storage space, but I have copies of every email Mr. Shakes sent me and IM conversation we had through which we forged the relationship that eventually became a marriage. Some of them are cringingly, excruciatingly embarrassing to read now—the things one says in an attempt to put forth one’s best self can be so utterly dreadful! But for this edition of News from Shakes Manor, I braved the depths and pulled out a snippet from the planning stages of what would become known as The Worst Camping Trip of All Time:

May 18, 2001 email from Mr. Shakes:

Anyways, I've come up with a few additions to our grocery list:

You Wrote:

Cigarettes
Vodka
Orange Juice
Cabernet Sauvignon
Cheese and crackers
Bananas
Oranges (maybe I should bring those from the States so they actually have flavor)
Weird meat products you intend to cook
Freeze-dried pouches o' sustenance
Junk food
Toilet paper (and lots of it)
Canned foods (corn - for real, it will make our shit like a damn disco)
Band-Aids (those'd be for me, of course)


My suggestions:

Humble pie: (For when either one of us loses an argument)

Chocolate biscuits: (Reward for winning an argument)

Water purification tablets: (for when I pee in your water bottle)

Omar Khyam's Quatrains: (I want to show you how fantastic they are)

Compass+Map: (Trust you to forget those)

Sellotape: (for sticking your crackers back together, after having them bashed about in a rucksack all day (God preserve me!))

Anti gravity generator: (to make your tinned food easier to carry)

2 crystal wine glasses (So we can drink the wine in a civilised manner)

A rope: (tied round your waist; this way when you fall over a cliff or into the Loch, I can cast the rope around a rock and save your glake ass

Gaiters (not the green snapping kind, you stick 'em on your shoes and it stops the water getting in - we will probably have to ford a few streams)

Change of underwear (since we are both bound to piss ourselves laughing)

Whistle (For signalling the rescue team)

Team of huskies and sled (for when we get lost, and wander too far north)

Dog food (see above)

Bedouin guide (for when we get lost, and wander too far south)

Camel food (see above)
Well, eventually we settled on a real list, divided up so that Mr. Shakes had his list of Things to Bring and I had mine. I brought the tent, a flashlight, a First-Aid kit, and those sorts of things. Mr. Shakes was to take care of provisions.

After a few days in London, which started with our nervous meeting and ended with nearly missing our flight out of Luton Airport thanks to a wholly useless cabbie, we flew into Inverness, and made our way to a B&B for one night. The next morning, we headed by cab to Glen Affric, which Mr. Shakes had chosen as our camping destination. At a tiny wee town (three houses and a general store), Cannoch, at what we thought was the mouth of the glen, we stocked up on supplies, and began the 10-mile uphill hike to Dog Falls, which was really the mouth of the glen.

Two miles in, I turned to Mr. Shakes: “We forgot toilet paper!” We looked back at road behind us, steeply declining away. Not worth it, we decided. The local foliage would have to suffice.

Six miles in, we saw a sign that read: No Camping. “They all say that,” Mr. Shakes assured me. And on we plowed.

Along the road ran a waist-high stone wall—convenient for sitting on, while stopping to have a smoke and a chat. We would swear we’d just stop for a moment, but each time, hours would pass, as we talked and talked and ate bananas and gulped our water, which we’d replenish at the loch once we got down into the glen. “Ha ha ha,” we laughed, “we’ll regret this when night falls and we’re nowhere near the glen yet.”

But the summer light stays in the sky late in the Highlands. We weren’t really worried.

It wasn’t even dusk when we reached Dog Falls. The views were breathtaking; we strolled across the wooden bridges and then sat down in a picnic area next to the stream, where we had sandwiches and fed eager little sparrows with bits of bread. The hours ticked by. “Ha ha ha,” we laughed, “we’ll regret this when night falls and haven’t set up camp yet.”

But the summer light stays in the sky late in the Highlands. We weren’t really worried.

And so we sat and talked, who knows about what. We had been talking for five straight days at that point, and had yet to run out of conversation. All of our plans—London museums, restaurants, camping—were falling apart. They seemed like distractions, impediments from what we really wanted to be doing, which was just lounge about and languidly drift across lines of discussion and debate. We’d had almost no sleep; ten days seemed like an eternity when we each secretly worried that maybe this ten-days-with-a-stranger idea was as foolish as we’d feared, but once it proved to be, perhaps, the best idea either of us had ever had, ten days seemed criminally short, and anything that diverted our attentions from one another was a chore.

Finally, the hint of dusk crept across the sky and we gathered up our bags and headed into the glen. And that’s when it all went horribly, hilariously wrong.

A few miles in, we found some flat ground on which to pitch the tent, so we stopped. And as soon as we did, we were engulfed in a swarm of midges—Scottish mosquitoes that are as small as gnats but as determined as starving lions to eat you alive. Mr. Shakes worked quickly to try to get the tent set up, but we were absolutely besieged. I held out my hands in front of my face and they were so covered with midges that they looked black. Not a scrap of shin shone through the buzzing masses of midges. They were in our eyes, our ears, our noses.

“Fooking wanking midges!” Mr. Shakes claimed. “Get the fook away froom me, ye cockwanking bastards!”

He was having trouble getting the tent set up in the shade and failing light. I swung the flashlight in his direction, pointing the way for thousands more midges to descend upon him.

“Get that fooking torch away from me!” he yelled. I turned my back, trying not to collapse into a fit of giggles as I swiped boatloads of midge carcasses off my face.

The midges continued their assault, and I began to run around in circles, laughing maniacally as Mr. Shakes issued a stream of profanity that would make Lenny Bruce blush. He kept having to leap to his feet and run around to get a momentary break from the midges, leaving the tent to collapse into a heap once again. “We have to get out of here!” I cried, over my shoulder, as I ran around drunkenly on the path. “I can’t take it!”

“Where do you proopoose we goo?!” Mr. Shakes shouted back, over his shoulder, running around drunkenly in the opposite direction.

“We’ll have to walk back to Cannoch!” I said.

“Ookay!” he agreed.

He scooped up the mess of tent into his arms and we started to run. As we ran away from the cloud of midges, he tried to fit the tent pieces back into their carrying case. It was a precise fit, and he couldn’t run and do it at the same time, but if we stopped, the swarm would get us. “What am I gooing to do with this fooking tent?” he wailed.

“Launch the fucker!” I shouted, and he threw it into the glen.

And we ran.

After a bit, we seemed to have outrun the swarm. We stopped for a moment so Mr. Shakes could dig out a Snickers, hungry as always. We walked on, and suddenly, all at once, every last bit of light fell out of the sky and we were left in pitch darkness. “Got the flashlight?” I asked, into the dark.

“Uh…” I heard rustling. Then frantic rustling. “I think I left it oon the groond when I stooped for that sweetie.”

We made our way in the darkness back along the path. I have never been in such darkness; I couldn’t see my hand in front of my face. When we thought we had reached the approximate place where we’d stopped, down on hands and knees we went, our hands feeling for a flashlight, and coming up with nothing but the slime of the three-inch black slugs that carpet the floor of the glen at night.

Miraculously, Mr. Shakes found the flashlight.

And on we walked.

We had walked about ten miles, bringing us to the halfway point on the road to the glen, when I suggested we stop at the one house along its route and ask to use the phone. Mr. Shakes looked at me as if I were mad. “This isn’t America, you dowsy Yank,” he said. “We doon’t have nice neighbors here.”

I then suggested he try his cell phone. Maybe he could finally get a signal again, and we could call a cab in Inverness to collect us. He pulled out his phone and began walking in the long grass at the side of the road, looking for a signal. And then he disappeared.

I heard a splash. And some more obscenities.

Mr. Shakes had fallen into a bog.

He managed to climb out, only to realize his phone was still in the bog. So he dove back in. And in the second miracle of the night, he fished it out, and in the third, it still worked—and had a signal.

We called for a cab and told the very confused dispatcher we’d be at the power station three miles up the road, the only landmark for miles. By that time, we were out of water, exhausted, and ready to crawl into a nice, comfortable bed. And as we sat on the stone wall that ran around the perimeter of the power station, we laughed.

“You know, that we’re still laughing after all this is pretty amazing,” I said.

“Fooking right,” Mr. Shakes agreed.

The cabbie who collected us made calls to the B&Bs in Inverness. Everything—every last rentable bed in Inverness—was booked solid.

Mr. Shakes and I moaned.

“Well, you two were up here to camp, aye?” asked the cabbie.

“Aye,” we said.

“There’s a campsite in Inverness,” he said happily. “I’ll just take you there. You’ve got a tent, right?”


Mr. Shakes at Dog Falls, blissfully unaware
of what lies in his immediate future.

Open Wide...