Oh, Kansas

The Disgruntled Chemist with yet another reason for our collective disgruntlement:

Despite overwhelming odds and centuries of precedent, the state of Kansas has successfully re-defined science. Six courageous board members ignored the naysayers who said it couldn't be done, and established that "a search for natural explanations of observable phenomena" is no longer an adequate definition of the scientific method. Because, let's face it, that sounds like a whole lot of work. Kansas can't expect its students to actually search for things; that would distract them from important duties like lifting small pigs and voting Republican. The Kansas school board should be applauded for having the courage to give up on the question of human origins and stride boldly forward into the sixteenth century.
Is it just me, or does a one-way ticket out of the US keep looking more and more like a time machine to the future?

Open Wide...

OMG

Go watch this video of Bush presenting a Presidential Medal of Freedom to Muhammad Ali.

From the accompanying story:

Bush, who appeared almost playful, fastened the heavy medal around Muhammad Ali's neck and whispered something in the heavyweight champion's ear. Then, as if to say "bring it on," the president put up his dukes in a mock challenge. Ali, 63, who has Parkinson's disease and moves slowly, looked the president in the eye -- and, finger to head, did the "crazy" twirl for a couple of seconds.

The room of about 200, including Cabinet secretaries, tittered with laughter. Ali, who was then escorted back to his chair, made the twirl again while sitting down. And the president looked visibly taken aback, laughing nervously.

[…]

Ali, dressed in a suit, barely cracking a smile, received the loudest and most sustained applause of the day. And the always quotable man who said "I ain't got no quarrel with them Viet Cong" and "I am the onliest of boxing's poet laureates" delivered the most striking moment without speaking a word.
The video cuts out the second twirl while sitting down, but it’s still worth a look. Here’s a screen capture (which admittedly is kinda crappy, but better than nothing, I hope) for those who can’t see the video:

Open Wide...

It’s not that I don’t like kids...

...it’s just that if I wanted to be around them 24/7, I’d be a parent myself.

The NY Times has an article about a café in Chicago’s Andersonville neighborhood which is causing a controversy among parents in the neighborhood for its sign warning that "children of all ages have to behave and use their indoor voices when coming to A Taste of Heaven." (Also mentioned is one of my favorite bookstores, Women and Children First, which will eject misbehaving kids—though it takes a bit more rambunctious behavior than implied by the article to elicit such action.) Predictably, some parents are annoyed and accusing the proprietor of A Taste of Heaven of not understanding children and parenting.

"I love people who don't have children who tell you how to parent," said Alison Miller, 35, a psychologist, corporate coach and mother of two. "I'd love for him to be responsible for three children for the next year and see if he can control the volume of their voices every minute of the day."
You know what I’d love? For people who have children to stop drudging up the old “people who don’t have children always think they’re experts on childrearing” canard every single time a childless person has an opinion on anything remotely related to children or parenting. When a dosey old spinster aunt looks down her patrician nose and sniffs, “If I had a child, he wouldn’t ever behave like that,” as the kid wails after conking his head on her glass coffee table, it’s a fair thing to say.

However, when someone suggests that a screeching two-year-old, whether screeching from pain or pleasure, doesn’t belong in a café, it’s not a fair thing to say. It implies that the childless are so bereft of the requisite knowledge to parent that we don’t even know that the volume of children’s voices can’t be controlled every minute of the day. Of course we know that. It may, in fact, be one of the primary reasons we don’t have children. The thing is, I think most parents who launch that condescending attempt at opinion-trumping know that we’re not dumb enough to believe their kids are squealing because of bad parenting. It’s just easier to hide behind that deliberate misconstruence than address what we’re really saying—that their kids are squealing in a café because their parents are bloody selfish.

Kim Cavitt recalled having coffee and a cookie one afternoon with her boisterous 2-year-old when "someone came over and said you just need to keep her quiet or you need to leave."

"We left, and we haven't been back since," Ms. Cavitt said. "You go to a coffee shop or a bakery for a rest, to relax, and that you would have to worry the whole time about your child doing something that children do - really what they're saying is they don't welcome children, they want the child to behave like an adult."
I’m truly baffled by the blinding self-absorption of a parent who can identify that people go to a café to rest and relax, but gets miffed that someone had the nerve to suggest most people don’t find a boisterous two-year-old conducive to relaxation. What’s astonishing about it is that I don’t think most other parents can easily tune out other people’s boisterous two-year-olds. I would imagine that a mother who’s on her own for the afternoon and chooses to spend it at a café sans-kids is among the least appreciative of café-goers when it comes to those who insist on toting in their squawk-boxes.

The point Ms. Cavitt seems to be missing is that it’s not her child that people want to behave like an adult—it’s her. No one expects a two-year-old to make a more nuanced decision than I am the center of the universe and this is what I want right this moment so this is what I’m going to do, but from her mother, we might expect a bit more. Of course she has a right to relax, but the whole world didn’t have a kid with her; she needs to find a new place to do her relaxing. It doesn’t seem so much to ask that when someone makes a life-changing decision like having a child that they actually change their lives, rather than expecting the rest of us to accommodate their new circumstances.

“The looks I would get when I went in there made me so nervous that I would try to buy the food as fast as I could and get out," said Laura Brauer, 40, who has stopped visiting A Taste of Heaven with her two children. "I think that the mothers who allow their kids to run around and scream, that's wrong, but kids scream and there is nothing you can do about it. What are we supposed to do, not enjoy ourselves at a cafe?"
Well, yeah. I mean, that’s the whole thing about having kids, isn’t it? You can’t expect to enjoy yourself in the same way anymore. Your favorite restaurant for an intimate gourmet meal probably isn’t family-friendly, and your neighborhood café probably isn’t, either, so if you go, leave the kids at home. Lord knows, there are plenty of places that cater to children and parents. I know they’re not “cool,” but no one who sees you dragging the stroller into one of the few indy cafés left in Chicago thinks you’re cool, anyway—they think you’re an inconsiderate, selfish boor insistent on forcibly turning every last little corner of kid-free America into a family venue.

(Hat tip Broadsheet.)

Open Wide...

Apparently, the White House is Filled with Quicksand


Judging by how fast Bush is sinking.

The latest NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll, released Wednesday night, finds that all five of Bush’s job approval ratings — on overall job performance, the economy, foreign policy, terrorism and Iraq — are at all-time lows in the survey. In addition, the CIA leak scandal seems to be taking a toll on the administration, with nearly 80 percent believing the indictment of Vice President Cheney's former chief of staff, Lewis “Scooter” Libby, is a serious matter, and with Bush experiencing a 17-point drop since January in those who see him as honest and straightforward.


Boy, a lot of people take a long time to wake up. What, were all of you Bush voters in the middle of a REM cycle during the last election?

According to the poll, Bush’s approval rating stands at an all-time low of 38 percent, a one-point decline since October; in fact, this is the third consecutive NBC/Journal survey showing Bush at an all-time low on his job approval. And it doesn’t stop there: Approval for his handling of the economy (34 percent), foreign policy (35 percent), terrorism (39 percent), and Iraq (32 percent) have all hit rock bottom.


Dems, you are being handed a big, shiny gift, complete with a bow. Don't fuck this up.

The Bush Republicans are finally having their masks ripped away, revealing the lizard aliens underneath. At this point, there is no reason to lose an election to a Republican. If the situation were reversed, the Repugs would destroy you.

Pick up on it.

(Rock Cross-Post! Down, Down!!)

Open Wide...

Sinking Ship

The loathsome one speaks:

“The victory of Democrat Tim Kaine over Republican Jerry Kilgore was the only contest in scattered off-year elections that was carefully monitored on Capitol Hill. For a liberal Virginian to win a Southern red state signaled that cherished Republican majorities in both House and Senate, plus all the perquisites they entail, could be lost in 2006. Eyeing the Democratic landslide in suburban northern Virginia just over the Potomac from Washington that gave Lt. Gov. Kaine the governorship, Republicans in Congress envision their own doom.

The antidote to avoid that fate is to keep as far away from President Bush as possible, a lesson underlined by the president's failed election rescue mission for former Virginia state Attorney General Kilgore. The consequences may be profound. As his approval rating dipped, Bush increasingly has been treated in Congress as a lame duck. Tuesday's Virginia outcome increases the propensity of Republican senators and House members not only to avoid their president on the campaign trail but also to ignore his legislative proposals…

After avoiding the president on Bush's recent visit to Norfolk, a desperate Kilgore asked for eleventh-hour help. The Monday night appearance in Richmond by a dispirited and exhausted Bush, returning from his difficult Latin America trip, was a dud.”

Uh-oh!

Meanwhile, Fineman reports on the Dems’ new wedge strategy, to expose and/or create “friction between: Bush and Cheney, Bush and his political advisor, Karl Rove; the White House and the Republican-run Congress; and between competing Republican leadership tongs on Capitol Hill.” That tasty little bit of mindfucking has Harry Reid’s fingerprints all over it.

And finally, President Edward John Smith’s approval ratings have hit yet another all-time low, with the latest NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll showing him with a 38% approval rating, which marks the third consecutive NBC/WSJ poll where he’s reached a new low. “Approval for his handling of the economy (34 percent), foreign policy (35 percent), terrorism (39 percent), and Iraq (32 percent) have all hit rock bottom.” And speaking of rock bottom, the number of Americans who believe Bush is honest and straightforward has dropped 17 percentage points since January 2005. Ouch.

Open Wide...

Morning

Sorry I went AWOL yesterday; I was feeling really crappy. Much lying on the couch wrapped in a blanket. Bit better today.

So I see Judy Miller has “retired.” Great. About four years too late, unfortunately.

And I see that Senator “Straight Talk America” McCain has given us one more reason to loathe and distrust him. If he has two faces on even the torture issue, I don’t think there’s anything this guy won’t use to his political advantage.

And happy birthday to the Marines.

Open Wide...

Flappy

Remember when Kevin Spacey was in really good movies, before he started making utter shite and (apparently) losing his mind?

Hollywood actor-turned-theatre director Kevin Spacey has installed an 'autograph' flap at London's Old Vic theatre, so he can safely meet and greet fans following performances there. ... The scale of his support has grown so much he has now fitted a clever contraption that allows him to reach out to the crowd and grab programs and scraps of paper to sign without greeting fans in person. A source tells London newspaper the Evening Standard, "The flap was Installed last week. Kevin loves it. He signs autographs between 10:30pm and 10:45pm. Not only does it make autograph-signing much less hassle but he also feels safer as he doesn't have to open the stage door."
Huh? That doesn’t sound clever. It sounds creepy!

Next time I’m in London, I’m going to go to the flap (between 10:30-10:45pm, of course) and slip Spacey a note telling him to quit being weird and make a decent movie again.

Open Wide...

Action Item: Alito

First read this via the Alliance for Justice. Then contact your Democratic and/or Moderate Republican Senators and ask them to reconsider their acceptance of Alito’s claim to respect stare decisis. Below is the letter I just sent to my senator, Evan Bayh. Feel free to nick it in whole.

Dear Senator Bayh:

I am very concerned about what I'm reading regarding Democratic Senators' meetings with Supreme Court nominee Sam Alito. I understand he has been stressing the importance of stare decisis, by which some Senators are feeling reassured.

Senator, my concern is that during his confirmation hearing in 1991, Justice Clarence Thomas identified stare decisis as providing "continuity to our system. It provides predictability, and in our process of case-by-case decision-making, I think it is a very important and critical concept." But since his confirmation, Justice Thomas has argued against Griswold (Lawrence v. Texas), joined a dissent calling for the seminal case preserving the separation of church and state, Lemon v. Kurtzman, to be overruled (Lee v. Weisman), argued against Miranda (Dickerson v. United States), and the list goes on and on. Justice Thomas does not believe in stare decisis, though such was his claim during his nomination process.

Many of Judge Alito's previous rulings indicate he is engaging in the same bit of trickery. As a pro-choice woman, a supporter of equal rights and justice for all, and a believer in the protection of privacy rights, I have very real concerns about the prospect of Judge Alito on the bench of the Supreme Court.

Senator, I hope you will bring to your fellow Democratic Senators' attention the history of a sitting justice who also claimed to believe in stare decisis, and bear in mind how many American minorities' rights, including women, the LGBT community, and ethnic minorities, may well depend on Judge Alito's confirmation.

Sincerely,
Melissa McEwan

Open Wide...

America is in the Hands of Monsters and Madmen


Go read this article:

US forces 'used chemical weapons' during assault on city of Fallujah

The website quoted insurgent sources as saying: "The US occupation troops are gassing resistance fighters and confronting them with internationally banned chemical weapons."

In December the US government formally denied the reports, describing them as "widespread myths". "Some news accounts have claimed that US forces have used 'outlawed' phosphorus shells in Fallujah," the USinfo website said. "Phosphorus shells are not outlawed. US forces have used them very sparingly in Fallujah, for illumination purposes.

"They were fired into the air to illuminate enemy positions at night, not at enemy fighters."

But now new information has surfaced, including hideous photographs and videos and interviews with American soldiers who took part in the Fallujah attack, which provides graphic proof that phosphorus shells were widely deployed in the city as a weapon.


Then remember the "reasons" the Bush Administration gave us for invading Iraq.

Then ask yourself why you're not reading about this in U.S. newspapers.

(Scary Monsters, Super cross-posts, Keeps me running, running scared...)

Open Wide...

“Marriage Protection” Amendment Update

Specter has indicated he will let this hateful little piece of proposed legislation out of the subcommittee today, bringing it one step closer to being brought up for a full Senate vote.

Call him anyway and tell him he’s a wanker register your polite disagreement with his decision to support discrimination: 202-224-4254.

(Thanks, Gary and Zoe Kentucky.)

Open Wide...

Creating New Realities

In the summer of 2002, after I had written an article in Esquire that the White House didn't like about Bush's former communications director, Karen Hughes, I had a meeting with a senior adviser to Bush. He expressed the White House's displeasure, and then he told me something that at the time I didn't fully comprehend -- but which I now believe gets to the very heart of the Bush presidency.

The aide said that guys like me were ''in what we call the reality-based community,'' which he defined as people who ''believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality.'' I nodded and murmured something about enlightenment principles and empiricism. He cut me off. ''That's not the way the world really works anymore,'' he continued. ''We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality -- judiciously, as you will -- we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.”


Ron Suskind, from his profile of Bush in the NY Times, October 2004

* * *

There is a brewing controversy about what exactly was said at the White House press conference on October 31. Everyone agrees NBC’s Dick [sic-David] Gregory said this:

Q Whether there’s a question of legality, we know for a fact that there was involvement. We know that Karl Rove, based on what he and his lawyer have said, did have a conversation about somebody who Patrick Fitzgerald said was a covert officer of the Central Intelligence Agency. We know that Scooter Libby also had conversations.
Congressional Quarterly and FNS both transcribed Press Secretary Scott McClellan’s answer as “That’s accurate.” The White House transcript lists McClellan’s answer as “I don’t think that’s accurate.

…[T]he White House is trying to get CQ and FNS to change their transcripts. They’ve refused.


Think Progress, who offer a video clip of the exchange in question, November 2005

Open Wide...

Where's John Doe When You Need Him?


Just when you think the greed and arrogance can't get any more ridiculous... here come those wacky oil executives!!
Oil Company Executives Defend Profits

Oh boy, here we go...

WASHINGTON - The chiefs of five major oil companies defended the industry's huge profits Wednesday at a Senate hearing where lawmakers said they should explain prices and assure people they're not being gouged.

There is a "growing suspicion that oil companies are taking unfair advantage," Sen. Pete Domenici, R-N.M., said as the hearing opened in a packed Senate committee room.

"The oil companies owe the country an explanation," he said.


Yes, indeed, they do. At a time when we're paying more at the pump than ever before, why in the world would gas companies be making record profits?

Are you ready? Are you ready for the big explanation?

Lee Raymond, chairman of Exxon Mobil Corp., said he recognizes that high gasoline prices "have put a strain on Americans' household budgets" but he defended his companies huge profits, saying petroleum earnings "go up and down" from year to year.


That's it??? Earnings "go up and down from year to year?" Jesus CHRIST. Look, Lee, I know your body is soft and flabby, but that doesn't give you the right to give soft and flabby answers. "Earnings go up and down, you know how it is," won't cut it in this case. Many Americans are having to choose between fueling their vehicle or putting food on the table due to gasoline prices. You are gouging, and that is obvious.

The industry argues that the run-up of gasoline prices, which began earlier in the year, stems from high global crude oil costs and growing demand for gasoline this past summer, followed by a disruption of gasoline supplies when the hurricanes shut down more than a dozen refineries on the Gulf Coast.


Then why are you posting record profits?

While the loudest calls for action against oil companies have come from Democrats, some Republicans have expressed similar frustrations.

"They are unhappy with the behavior of the oil companies," said Republican pollster David Winston, who advises GOP congressional leaders. "These are free market guys. They believe the market works. But in this case they are concerned that the consumer was clearly taken advantage of ... and they're pretty angry about it."


But, of course, nothing will be done about it. You know, I'm surprised that none of these guys, who I'm sure would classify themselves as Good Christianstm, seem to be at all worried about two of the Seven Deadly Sins, Greed and Gluttony.


These men have no trouble putting food on the table.
These men never have to worry about being able to fill their gas tank.
These men probably never pump their own gas, for chrissakes.

We deserve real fucking answers, you bastards.

EDIT: Tbogg calls bullshit on this, too.

(Please, sir... I want some more cross-posts.)

Open Wide...

Shocking

Seriously, how much do some dudes hate condoms?

Men in Serbia are lining up to have electric shocks delivered to their testicles as part of a new contraceptive treatment.

Serbian fertility expert Dr Sava Bojovic, who runs one of the clinics offering the service, said the small electric shock makes men temporarily infertile by stunning their sperm into a state of immobility.

He said: "We attach electrodes to either side of the testicles and send low electricity currents flowing through them.

"This stuns the sperm, effectively putting them to sleep for up to 10 days, which means couples can have sex without fear of getting pregnant.

"The method does not kill the sperm permanently and it does not affect the patient's health."

Dr Bojovic added patients were now lining up at his fertility clinic in Novi Banovci for the shock treatment, as it had none of the problems attached to using condoms, the male pill or having a vasectomy.
I think if you’re having problems with condoms so severe that you’re willing to get a lightning bolt to the gonads to avoid them, you just might be doing something wrong with the johnnies. They’re generally not that problematic.

But here’s some good news:

He added: "We are hoping to have a small battery powered version on sale in the shops in time for Xmas."
Fantastic! Merry Christmas, darling; now drop your pants and bite down on this leather strap—it’s time for the old zap-zap. Ride the lightning!!! Once your balls cool off, we’ll rut like pigs.

In all seriousness, I’m not a fan of anything that could even inadvertently discourage safe sex. Men don’t really need one more excuse for not wearing condoms (nor women/men one more excuse for not requiring their partners wear them) in this day and age.

Open Wide...

Faux News

Just watching Fox for a few minutes as part of my daily morning masochism, and the idiot spinmeister they had on to talk about the election results (“Republican Bloomberg crushes Dem opponent in NY!”) dismissed the two Democratic gubernatorial wins by saying they were no big deal, since incumbents won.

Problem is, neither of them were incumbents.

Fortunately, there was a token Dem guest who cleared up that mistake, since the host couldn’t be bothered (and/or didn’t know the facts).

Note to Dems today: When you’re asked about Bloomberg’s big win, instead of robotically parroting what seems to be the standard line—“New York City seems to be above partisan politics”—how about pointing out that Bloomberg is unusual among his party, in that he is both pro-choice and pro-gay rights? Take a little wind out of the conservative sails when given the chance!

Open Wide...

Election Results

Democrats Kaine and Corzine won their gubernatorial races in Virginia and New Jersey, respectively. Woohoo!

Unfortunately, but not unsurprisingly, Texas voters passed a gay marriage ban. On the upside, Maine voters defeated a challenge to gay rights. And in one of my favorite stories, every incumbent pro-intelligent design-in-classrooms school board member in Dover, PA was ousted (via Atrios). Ha. Now that’s a mandate, bitches.

Reform initiative recap via Political Wire:

In California, all four of Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s (R) “Year of Reform” ballot measures were defeated. The Los Angeles Times called the vote a "sharp repudiation" of the governor "that shattered his image as an agent of the popular will."

In Ohio, four reform ballot measures to change election laws and introduce non-partisan redistricting were soundly rejected. The Cleveland Plain Dealer says "an ambitious effort by opponents and widespread confusion over the complex issues combined to defeat the entire package."

In New York, voters rejected a proposal to give the legislature more power over designing the state’s budget. The New York Times reports the measure lost "by a wide margin."

In New Jersey, voters agreed to create a lieutenant governorship. The Newark Star Ledger notes the office will be official in 2010.

Also, Bush is now officially a liability. Wave buh-bye to the rats, you sinking ship of a president.

Open Wide...

Transgender Protection in Indy

Good job, Indy:

Mayor Bart Peterson expanded the city hiring policy to include protection for transgender employees, reissuing an earlier executive order last Friday.

Including the phrase "gender identity" in the policy that prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation corrected an oversight from the original executive order issued in 2004, he said. The change brings the city's policy in line with the state policy adopted by Gov. Joe Kernan and kept in place by Gov. Mitch Daniels.

[…]

Several advocacy groups supporting gay rights praised the mayor for recognizing the value of all employees, including Indiana Equality and Stonewall Democrats.
Baby steps. Hoosiers. I know this is a pretty big deal for us, since we've still got homobigoted "Christian" assholes roaming the streets with their hymn-singing children, burning gay flags, and carrying signs announcing "Fags Die, God Laughs," so protecting gays for a change is a good, solid start. Perhaps soon, we can talk about not reviving the proposed anti-gay and assisted pregnancy legislation. And after that, maybe we can start taking down confederate flags, k?

Open Wide...

Question of the Day

Which actor or actress did you thoroughly (and perhaps unaccountably) dislike until you saw them in a movie you liked, and which movie was it?

My mom infamously loathed Nicholas Cage for years after seeing him in Moonstruck. It was only after forcing her to watch Guarding Tess that she finally came around and now likes him—although she still hates him in Moonstruck.

This has happened to me on a number of occasions, but two in particular really stand out. I was hugely unimpressed with Colin Farrell through no fault of his own, before I’d ever seen him in anything, simply because of the massive media hype surrounding his every move a few years ago—too overexposed. Then I saw him in Tigerland, and I had to admit he was a damn fine actor. Then I saw A Home at the End of the World, and I fell in love—a love so strong that even Alexander did not mean its undoing.

The other one was Matt Damon, who I liked in Good Will Hunting, and then started to dislike for some reason I can’t quite explain, although it partly had to do with how irrationally agitated I was by his perfect, gleaming white teeth in the middle of war in the fairly dreadful Saving Private Ryan. For years, I couldn’t stand him, and even avoided movies I now adore, like The Talented Mr. Ripley and Rounders, because he was in them. Then I saw The Bourne Identity, and suddenly I liked him again, probably more than before. Curious, that.

Open Wide...

Election Update

From Campaign for America's Future communications director Toby Chaudhuri:

Progressive candidates are winning across the country. Reactionary initiatives are losing in Colo., Ohio and Calif. Progressive candidates are winning at the local level in Colo., Wash. and Ariz. The right-wing says this success for progressives is due to local circumstances. Republicans might just want to listen to the message voters are sending them. Americans have suffered a stunning reversal of fortune. The corrupt politics that got us into this fix are not likely to get us out. They are part of the problem, not part of the solution. For American families, right-wing policies simply makes things worse. It is hard to recall a party that is more corrupt or more out of tune with the needs of the time.
Right on. Good news.

UPDATE: Meanwhile, the ever-vigilant BradBlog tracks voting irregularities in California, Virginia, Ohio, and more Ohio, plus has a round-up of reported problems elsewhere here.

Open Wide...

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Woo, that GOP—such a bunch of sardonic kidders:

With Vice President Dick Cheney under mounting fire, his office together with the White House and the Republican Party responded with a coordinated counter-attack on Tuesday, accusing Sen. Harry Reid of malicious conduct "unbecoming" his role as Democratic leader.

[...]

Within minutes of each other, White House spokesman Scott McClellan, counsel to the vice president Steve Schmidt and the Republican National Committee all issued responses bashing Reid.

McClellan decried Reid's "rants" as "unbecoming of a leader of any party," and said Americans would question "whether Democrats are more concerned about the peoples' priorities or scoring political points at the expense of a dedicated public servant."

Schmidt called Reid's comments "unconscionable personal attacks and malicious," adding: "These are beneath the office of the Democratic leader."

Brian Jones, the RNC's communications director, said Reid's comments were "vicious" and accused him of spinning a "far-flung conspiracy theory."
Wait a second—you guys are serious?!

Wow, that’s actually even funnier.

Open Wide...

Yeesh

If there’s one good thing I can say about the nomination of Scalito to the SCOTUS, it’s that it has revealed exactly how deeply entrenched real, old-school sexism is among conservatives. Enter the Wall Street Journal’s James Taranto with his take on Scalito’s Casey dissent regarding “spousal” notification, filed under the headline Pro-Wife Extremism:

By 1992, when the high court decided Planned Parenthood v. Casey, the right to marital privacy had somehow morphed into a woman's right to abort her husband's child without telling him. The court's privacy jurisprudence has become simply a matter of five justices' policy preferences, unmoored from any limiting principle. You don't have to be a pro-life absolutist to object to this exercise in pro-wife extremism.
A woman’s right to abort her husband’s child without telling him. Not their child, and certainly not her child. Her husband’s child. If one was learning about the birds and the bees from Taranto’s column, one might draw the conclusion that a woman is nothing more than a vessel for a child her husband wished into existence, or that men plant their seeds in the back garden for their wives to dutifully water until they bloom into children.

Spousal notification is just a back door for conservatives to control women’s bodies and choices, granting permission to a husband that the government no longer has. What’s the difference between a government being able to force a woman to carry an unwanted child and her husband being able to force the same? The husband may have contributed to the pregnancy, but the inevitability of the woman’s necessarily having some association with that man via the child for the next 18 years (at least) outweighs his interest. That isn’t radical; it’s a recognition of the reality that most women who would seek an abortion without their husbands’ knowledge have good reason to do so. Exacerbating that problem by inextricably linking the couple together, not to mention bringing a child into the picture, serves no altruistic purpose.

The insistence of Taranto, and others like him, on pretending it isn’t only the most desperate women who abort pregnancies without discussing it with their partners is extreme—extremely dishonest, extremely unsympathetic, and extremely revealing. Giving a woman autonomous choice over her body isn’t pro-wife extremism, but giving a man control over his wife’s body just might be pro-husband in the extreme.

(Hat tip to Joshua Holland at The Gadflyer.)

Open Wide...