Showing posts with label reproductive rights. Show all posts
Showing posts with label reproductive rights. Show all posts

We Resist: Day 868

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures (plus the occasional non-Republican who obliges us to resist their nonsense, too, like we don't have enough to worry about) is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Late yesterday and earlier today by me: Malice Is His Agenda. Compassion Is Mine. and Today Is the 75th Anniversary of D-Day and Primarily Speaking and Pelosi Still Won't Budge on Impeachment.

Let's start with some GOOD news today...

Tierney Sneed at TPM: North Carolina Republicans Fail to Overturn Governor's Veto of Anti-Abortion Bill. "North Carolina's legislature upheld Gov. Roy Cooper’s (D) veto of an anti-abortion bill Wednesday afternoon. Only this year — after the 2018 midterms — did Democrats have enough seats in the legislature to end the GOP's supermajority in the statehouse, which had previously given Republicans the votes to override Cooper's vetoes."

The Republicans will keep fighting, especially their fight to keep gerrymandering the state so that Democrats can't even get a majority in the legislature anymore, but this is very good news for the moment. Yay!

And the battle continues nationally...

Dr. Leana Wen at Rewire.News: A State of Emergency in Missouri and Across the Country. "We are in a state of emergency for reproductive health in America, and it requires a true emergency response. Over the past few months, we've seen just how vulnerable access to safe, legal abortion is across the country. Anti-abortion politicians in states across the country have enacted extreme, dangerous, and unconstitutional abortion bans that will endanger lives. ...As an emergency physician, I don't use the words 'emergency' lightly. But I know one when I see it, and there is no denying that the United States is facing a state of emergency that must be addressed." This is a public health crisis.

Elham Khatami at ThinkProgress: Trump's Decision to End Federal Fetal Tissue Research Is Dangerous. "The Trump administration on Wednesday announced that it would end fetal tissue research by federal scientists, despite strong evidence of the benefits of using fetal tissue to research treatments and diseases that affect millions of people, including HIV, human development disorders, and various cancers. Ironically, the administration positioned the move as a way to protect the 'dignity of human life.'"


* * *

Mark Hosenball at Reuters: Still No Briefing for Senate Intel Panel on Mueller Report. "The only committee of the U.S. Congress running a genuinely bipartisan probe of Russian meddling in U.S. politics has still had no word from the Trump administration on briefing the panel about the Mueller report's counterintelligence findings, congressional sources said on Wednesday. ...Since the mid-April release of the redacted report, the Senate Intelligence Committee has been stonewalled in much the same way the administration has refused to cooperate with other committees, two congressional sources said."

[CN: Nativism] Camilo Montoya-Galvez at CBS News: Military to Spend a Month Painting Border Barriers to "Improve Aesthetic Appearance". "In its notification to Congress, DHS said [assigning members of the military to spend a month painting a mile-long stretch of barriers to improve their 'aesthetic appearance'] in Tucson, Arizona had allowed Border Patrol to combat the 'camouflaging tactics of illegal border crossers' who sought to evade detection. The agency said migrants also appeared to have 'greater difficulty' scaling painted bollards along the border. On Twitter, Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin, the second-highest Democrat in the Senate, denounced the task as a 'disgraceful misuse' of taxpayer money. 'Our military has more important work to do than making Trump's wall beautiful,' he added."

[CN: Nativism; white supremacy; trans hatred; death]


Barbie Latza Nadeau at the Daily Beast: No Disciplinary Action for Top Military Brass Involved in Botched Niger Mission. "Acting Defense Secretary Pat Shanahan said Thursday that he agreed with an independent investigation that cleared top military brass in a 2017 special-forces mission in Niger that left four U.S. soldiers dead. The Wall Street Journal reports Shanahan said none of the officers in charge of the mission that led to a deadly ambush of Green Berets by militants should be disciplined. The Pentagon inquiry recommended administrative discipline for 'mistakes and oversights' by nine of those involved in the fatal mission, but stopped short of further action that might have included dismissals from service."

My condolences once more to Myeshia Johnson.

I can't believe that was less than two years ago. It feels like sixteen eternities.

* * *

Melanie Schmitz at ThinkProgress: Trump Says He'll Decide New China Tariffs Following G20, Amid Trade Battle with Republicans. "Donald Trump said Thursday that he would decide whether to impose a new round of tariffs on $325 billion worth of Chinese goods following the G20 summit in Osaka at the end of June. Trump's comments came during a joint appearance with French President Emmanuel Macron, not long after the U.S. president announced he might ratchet up his trade war with China to 'at least $300 billion' on Chinese goods."

[CN: Video may autoplay at link] Alexander Nazaryan at Yahoo News: Trump Admits His Cabinet Had 'Some Clinkers'.
Raised on Norman Vincent Peale's "power positive thinking" quasi-philosophy, the president was attempting to convince both of us that his people really were the best people, even as evidence to the contrary presented itself daily in the form of damning news reports, mystifying congressional testimony, and ethics reports that read like treatments for Mafia movies.

"There are those that say we have one of the finest Cabinets," Trump claimed. That is not a commonly held view. In fact, it is difficult to think of anyone even halfway credible — Republican or Democrat — who has said anything approaching that.

...Trump did allow that there had been "some clinkers," by which he presumably meant people like EPA administrator Pruitt and HHS head Price, both of whom left the administration in disgrace, as did several other of their colleagues.

"But that's okay," he said of hiring men and women who turned out to be less than they seemed and less than he'd hoped. "Who doesn't?" True enough. But there's a difference between a clinker and a charlatan, a man who is no good at his job and a man who sets out to do that job poorly.
And there is a difference between someone who falls out of the president's favor because of incompetency and someone who falls out of the president's favor because of insufficient fealty.

Joshua Partlow, David A. Fahrenthold, and Taylor Luck at the Washington Post: A Wealthy Iraqi Sheikh Who Urges a Hardline U.S. Approach to Iran Spent 26 Nights at Trump's D.C. Hotel. "In July, a wealthy Iraqi sheikh named Nahro al-Kasnazan wrote letters to national security adviser John Bolton and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo urging them to forge closer ties with those seeking to overthrow the government of Iran. Kasnazan wrote of his desire 'to achieve our mutual interest to weaken the Iranian Mullahs regime and end its hegemony.' Four months later, he checked into the Trump International Hotel in Washington and spent 26 nights in a suite on the eighth floor — a visit estimated to have cost tens of thousands of dollars."

And finally, in possibly but probably still unlikely good news... Elizabeth Lopatto at the Verge: Bowing to Pressure, YouTube Will Reconsider Its Harassment Policies. "YouTube will reconsider its harassment policies and may update them, the company said in a new blog post. The statement was apparently prompted by public pressure on the company after a conflict between two YouTubers: Carlos Maza, who hosts for Vox, and Stephen Crowder, a conservative media personality. In response to backlash, YouTube has convened a blue-ribbon commission and appears to be hoping everyone will stop screaming." Lolsob.

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

#StopTheBans

[Content Note: War on agency.]


As I mentioned earlier, there are hundreds of events around the country today protesting the abortion bans being passed in state legislatures, and you can follow along on Twitter with the hashtag #StopTheBans.

I've been following with each free moment I've had today, often with tears streaming down my face because of a constellation of emotions: Pride in and solidarity with the protesters; anger at the actions by Republican legislators that obliged the protests; fear of what will happen to women et. al. if we lose the fight to prevent these bans from taking effect.


I have previously noted on many occasions (here, was probably the first time) that I'm hard-pressed to see why I should be any less contemptuous of a man (or woman) who sits at a big mahogany desk in a government building making decisions about my body without my consent than I should be of the men who used physical force to make decisions about my body without my consent.

It is an observation by which anti-choice folks are outraged. They are horrified to be compared, even obliquely, to sexual predators. As well they should be. I am horrified to have to make it. But anyone who holds the position that they should be able to legislate away my bodily autonomy and supersede my consent about what happens to my body shouldn't be too goddamned surprised by the comparison.

One must be ridiculously incapable of self-reflection to simultaneously argue that sexual assault (forcing a woman to do something with her body she doesn't want to do) is a Terrible Thing, but the denial of abortion (forcing a woman to do something with her body she doesn't want to do) is a Moral Imperative.

Disallowing access to abortion, i.e. forced birth, is an inherently violent position which values fetuses more highly than the people who carry them.

I am utterly unwilling to pretend it could ever be anything else.


This is a war on agency. It's a war on autonomy. It's a war on choice. It's a war on consent. It's a war on women and anyone else who can get pregnant. It's a war that will be expanded to control any bodies that the authoritarian pigshits in charge want to control to limit people's freedom.

We matter.

Our agency matters.

Our autonomy matters.

Our choice matters.

Our consent matters.

Our freedom matters.

We matter.

#StopTheBans.

Open Wide...

Leslie Jones Has Your Back

Ghostbuster Leslie Jones made an appearance on Saturday Night Live's Weekend Update to say a few words to the men — and women — passing anti-abortion legislation on the state level. And to let the women in those states know that they aren't alone. I love this message eleventy-seven times as much as telling people to "move." This is the message we need: WE HAVE YOUR BACK. Because reproductive choice is FREEDOM.

Video Transcript: Weekend Update anchor Colin Jost, a white man, sits at the Update desk. Leslie Jones, a Black woman, soon joins him.

Jost: This week, Alabama passed a near-total ban on abortion, in what many say is part of a larger effort to overturn Roe v. Wade. Here to comment is our own Leslie Jones!

[audience cheers and applause; Jones comes out wearing a white bonnet and red cape a la The Handmaid's Tale. ]

Jones: Hoooooo! Yesssssss! Blessed be the fruit, Colin.

Jost: Are you in a Handmaid's Tale outfit?

Jones: Well, basically, we're all handmaids now — so my name is actually Ofjost. [laughter] But I don't know how good of a babymaker I'm gonna be, because my eggs is dusty as hell! [laughter] But I'll give it a shot!

Jost: I don't think, Leslie — I don't think society's quite there yet.

Jones: No? You would think that, right? [tears off bonnet and cape to reveal a black t-shirt reading MINE in big white letters and a downward pointing arrow; audience cheers] You would think that. But this is how it starts. I'm out living my life, then I see on the news a bunch of states are trying to ban abortion — and then tell me what I can and can't do with my body. Next thing you know, I'm in Starbucks, and they won't take my credit card because I'm a woman, instead of the regular reason which is I don't have no money on it. [laughter]

And what made me so mad [squeezes fists] was seeing the twenty-five Alabama senators who voted for the abortion ban. Throw that picture up. [image of 25 white male legislators; audience boos] Look at 'em. All men. This look like the casting call for a Lipitor commercial. [laughter] This look like the mugshots of everyone arrested at a massage parlor. [laughter] And if any of 'em had lips, I would tell them to kiss my entire ass. [laughter]

You can't control women! [audience cheers and applause] You can't control women! Because, uh, I don't know if y'all heard, but women are the same as humans! [cheers] And I'm Leslie Dracarys Jones! [applause]

I mean, why do alla these weird-ass men care about what women choose to do with they bodies, anyway?! I don't care what you do witchyo sixty-five-year-old droopy-ass balls! [laughter]

And how is Alabama's woman governor going along with this? WHAT?! You not rebel— Me? I'm rebellious from the top! When people tell me "good morning," I say, "No it's not. You don't know my morning. [laughter] Don't take away my choice to have a bad morning."

Because when women have a choice, women have FREEDOM!!! [cheers and applause]

Jost: That's right.

[Jones snaps her fingers repeatedly as the audience continues to cheer]

Jost: That's right. You tell 'em, Leslie!

[Jones turns on Jost and looks at him with contempt]

Jones: SHUT UP! [laughter] Ya flat white privilege latte. [laughter; Jones turns back to the camera] Look, the fact that nine states are doing this means this really is a war on women. [NB: And anyone who can get pregnant.] And if you're a woman out there and you feel scared or confused, just know that you're not alone. There's so many women out there that got your back — especially me, Leslie Dracarys That Bitch Jones! [cheers and applause]

You can't tell me what to do with my body. You can't make me small, or put me in a box. I'm six feet tall and two hundred and thirty-three pounds. [cheers] Ain't no box big enough to hold me!

And I know, 'cuz, uh, one time I tried to mail myself to a dude. [laughter]

Jost: Leslie Jones, everyone! [cheers and applause]

Jones: DRACARYS!!!

Open Wide...

Texas Republicans Hold Hearing on Legislation That Would Make Abortion Punishable by Death

[Content Note: War on agency; reproductive coercion.]

This is straight-up terrorism against women and other people who can become pregnant by the Republican caucus in the Texas state legislature: The Texas House Committee on Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence held a two-day hearing on a bill introduced by GOP state Rep. Tony Tinderholt, which would "criminalize abortion without exception, and make it possible to convict women who undergo the procedure of homicide, which can carry the death penalty in Texas."

Over the course of the two-day hearing, members of the public "rose to ask lawmakers to protect life, describing a 'genocide' and foreseeing the arrival of 'God's wrath,'" as they petitioned legislators to take up the bill introduced by Tinderholt, "who has been married five times [and] argues that the measure is necessary to make women 'more personally responsible.'"

It was the first time in the state's history, committee members said, that public testimony had been heard on a measure holding women criminally liable for their abortions. The legislation was left pending on Tuesday, as Democrats claimed there was a contradiction in the agenda advanced by its supporters, who call themselves "pro-life."

"I'm trying to reconcile in my head the arguments that I heard tonight about how essentially one is okay with subjecting a woman to the death penalty for the exact — to do to her the exact same thing that one is alleging she is doing to a child," said state Rep. Victoria Neave, a Democrat who represents part of Dallas County.
Not only is this bullshit terroristic and hypocritical in the extreme; it is also reproductive coercion. What could be more coercive than forcing a person to carry an unwanted pregnancy to term under the threat of death?

There are people who accuse me of hyperbole when I call the Republican Party a white supremacist patriarchal death cult, but I stand the fuck by it, and this shit is a perfect, terrible example of why.

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 767

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures (plus the occasional non-Republican who obliges us to resist their nonsense, too, like we don't have enough to worry about) is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Earlier today by me: Primarily Speaking and Another Sexual Assault Allegation Against Trump.

Here are some more things in the news today...


Donald Trump is a disgusting human being. His cruelty and depravity know no bounds. Goddammit.

* * *

In good resistance news...

Zachary Warmbrodt at Politico: House Democrats Target Trump's Personal Finances. "The House Financial Services and Intelligence Committees have been staffing up for their probes into the bank and Trump's Russia ties. Democrats on the panels say that with Deutsche Bank they are willing to pursue a key area that Mueller may have avoided — crossing what Trump sees as a 'red line' into his personal finances. 'There's a heightened need to look into anything that could compromise the president or the country, particularly if it's not being investigated elsewhere,' House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) told Politico. 'I don't know that to be the case but I just haven't seen any external signs that that's happening.'"

Ed Pilkington at the Guardian: 'We Should Be Outraged': Alabama Congresswoman Tackles Voter Suppression. "The Democratic party this week launches a major push to repair America's broken electoral system and counter a wave of voter suppression that has swept the country, depriving hundreds of thousands of citizens of the right to vote. Terri Sewell, an Alabama congresswoman from the civil rights crucible of Selma, is sponsoring the Voting Rights Advancement Act that will be introduced to the House of Representatives on Tuesday. She told the Guardian it was time to restore and advance American democracy: 'We don't want just to shatter the glass ceiling; we want to break down the door.' She added: 'We should be making it easier for people to vote. We should be strong enough as a nation that everybody can have a voice.'"

[Content Note: White supremacy; terrorism] Dan Lamothe at the Washington Post: House Democrats Press the U.S. Military About How It Is Screening for White Nationalism and Other Extremism in the Ranks.
A series of incidents in which U.S. troops have been arrested in cases involving white nationalism is of "significant concern, particularly given their combat and weapons training," several House Democrats said in a letter on Monday, pressing the Pentagon and Department of Homeland Security for information about how they screen for recruits.

Maryland Reps. Elijah Cummings, Anthony Brown, and Jamie Raskin and California Rep. Jackie Speier wrote that they applaud the actions taken by federal agencies in the arrest this month of Coast Guard Lt. Christopher P. Hasson, a self-proclaimed white nationalist who authorities say had a list of journalists and politicians that he planned to kill.

But citing that case and others in 2017, the lawmakers asked acting Pentagon chief Patrick Shanahan and Department of Homeland Security Kirstjen Nielsen, who oversees the Coast Guard, how Hasson and others who demonstrated extremist views were able to circumvent the military's checks.

"Our hope is that these incidents are isolated events and are not indicative of a larger, systemic issue within the United States Armed Services," the lawmakers wrote. "Beyond the extremes of domestic terrorism, we are additionally concerned with low level racism and other identity-based harassment that disrupts unit cohesion, impacts readiness, and degrades the ability of our servicemembers to protect our nation. Servicemembers who experience or witness racist or hateful behavior must be able to report such behavior without fear of repercussions."
This has been a problem for a very long time. It needs more attention desperately.

Andy Towle at Towleroad: Former GOP Lawmakers Warn Congress to Vote Against Trump's National Emergency or Risk Undermining Their Constitutional Authority. "A group of almost two dozen former Republicans have sent a letter to GOP lawmakers, warning them to reject Donald Trump's border wall national emergency or risk undermining their institution and the U.S. Constitution. ...Meanwhile, Trump is warning Republicans that they better vote for him, or else, tweeting: 'I hope our great Republican Senators don't get led down the path of weak and ineffective Border Security. Without strong Borders, we don't have a Country — and the voters are on board with us. Be strong and smart, don't fall into the Democrats 'trap' of Open Borders and Crime!'" Thus proving the authors of the letter absolutely correct.

* * *

[CN: Video autoplays at link] CNN: U.S. May Drop Demand for North Korea's Nuclear Inventory. "As [Donald] Trump prepares to head to Vietnam for his second summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, CNN has learned from administration officials that the U.S. is weighing watering down its own demands from North Korea." Of course.

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW): New Report: Trump Appears to Have Committed Multiple Campaign Finance-Related Crimes. "There is compelling evidence that [Donald] Trump may have personally committed up to eight criminal campaign finance and related offenses while running for president and during his first year in office... In a new report, A Campaign to Defraud, CREW combs through the facts behind these apparent crimes, based on admissions by two of [Donald] Trump's likely co-conspirators and news reports, detailing how criminal law can already be applied to publicly known facts. Most of [Donald] Trump's potential violations are related to illegal campaign contributions meant to cover up evidence of Trump's affairs with two women, preventing voters from learning the truth about his behavior ahead of the election, though at least one continued well into his first year in office."

[CN: War on agency; misogyny] Laura Huss and Katelyn Burns at Rewire.News: What You Need to Know About Trump's Attacks on the Federal Family Planning Program. "In order to provide public funding and support to family planning services nationwide, the federal grant program commonly referred to as 'Title X' was created as part of the Public Health Service Act, signed into law by Republican President Nixon in 1970. With Title X, Nixon made good on his campaign promise that 'no American woman should be denied access to family planning assistance because of her economic condition.' ...According to advocates, the Trump administration presents a threat to the family planning grant program that hasn't been seen before." Katelyn Burns has even more here: Trump Administration Releases Final Text of Domestic 'Gag Rule' Restriction on Title X.

[CN: Nativism] Shani Saxon at Colorlines: ACLU Wants Government to Account for All Migrant Children Separated from Families. "The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) asked a federal judge on Thursday (February 21) to order the government to provide an accurate accounting of all migrant children separated from their families at the southern border... The OIG originally put the number of family separations executed under Trump administration's 'zero tolerance policy' at just under 3,000 last spring, but the new report says that 'thousands of children may have been separated during an influx that began in 2017, before the accounting required by the court.'"

[CN: Anti-Semitism] Evan Simko-Bednarski and Augusta Anthony at CNN: Police in NYC Are Investigating the Second Set of Swastikas Found in the Last Three Days. "For the second time in three days, the New York City Police Department is investigating swastikas found scrawled in places where children play. Two swastikas were discovered some time between Sunday night and Monday morning at Brighton Playground in the Brighton Beach section of Brooklyn, according to the NYPD. The Nazi symbols were written in black marker beneath a slide. The graffiti was discovered just two days after dozens of swastikas, a Nazi eagle, and the words 'Hail Hitler' (sic) were found Friday morning drawn in chalk on the pavement of a Queens schoolyard. The two incidents are being investigated by the NYPD's hate crime task force, according to police."

Ian Millhiser at ThinkProgress: The Supreme Court Is About to Hear the Biggest Threat to Separation of Church and State in Decades. "The Supreme Court will hear two cases on Wednesday that never should have been filed in the first place. The outcomes in American Legion v. American Humanist Association and Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission v. American Humanist Association, two consolidated cases considering the fate of a cross-shaped monument in Maryland, are as preordained as anything in the Supreme Court can be. Every single member of the Court's conservative majority will almost certainly vote to uphold the cross. They may even be joined by some of the liberal justices."

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 725

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures (plus the occasional non-Republican who obliges us to resist their nonsense, too, like we don't have enough to worry about) is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Earlier today by me: Quite a Weekend for Russian Puppet Donald Trump and Julián Castro Announces Candidacy for President. And ICYMI late Friday: An Observation About the Shutdown.

Here are some more things in the news today...

Paul McLeod and Tarini Parti at BuzzFeed: This Is Now the Longest Government Shutdown in U.S. History and There's No End in Sight. "The ongoing government shutdown became the longest in United States history Saturday, and there is no end to the standoff in sight. [Today] marks the [24th] day of the partial shutdown, breaking the previous record of 21 days set during Bill Clinton's presidency between December 1995 and January 1996. That shutdown affected only a third as many workers. ...Friday was supposed to be payday for government workers. Around 800,000 people — roughly half of whom are furloughed, half of whom are deemed essential and must work without pay — missed their first paycheck since the shutdown began. Cracks are already starting to show. TSA workers are calling in sick in droves. Low-wage subcontractors are losing wages they'll likely never get back. Even the organization tasked with stabilizing the spike in asylum claims at the southern border has been largely shut down."

And that's just the tip of the iceberg, of course. People who rely on food stamps are going to have to try to find other sources of food if the shutdown doesn't end soon. Federal prisoners are soon going to start feeling the effects of a major barrier to their accessing resources, including food. People who live in federally subsidized housing may start having trouble making rent. The shutdown is already grim for millions of people, and it's going to escalate fast.

Meagan Flynn at the Washington Post: Compelled to Work without Pay, Federal Employees Sue Trump, Accusing Him of Violating 13th Amendment. "A group of federal employees working without pay during the partial government shutdown are likening the predicament to involuntary servitude in a lawsuit filed last week, accusing [Donald] Trump and their bosses of violating the 13th Amendment. ...Employees at U.S. Customs and Border Protection, the Bureau of Prisons, and Federal Aviation Administration have already filed lawsuits against the administration through their respective unions, among others. But this case, filed Wednesday in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, diverges from the others by invoking the 13th Amendment, which abolished slavery and involuntary servitude in the aftermath of the Civil War. The four plaintiffs, who are from Texas and West Virginia, work for the departments of Justice, Agriculture, and Transportation; one is an air traffic controller. The lawsuit also claims violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, among other statutes."

Martin Pengelly and Oliver Laughland at the Guardian: Trump Rejects Lindsey Graham's Proposal to Reopen Government. "On day 24 of the partial government shutdown, the longest in history, Senate Republicans seemed best placed to negotiate a reopening of shuttered federal departments and threatened services and the restoration of pay to 800,000 workers. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, who has worked assiduously to get close to Donald Trump, said he told the president he should reopen the government temporarily, to pursue a deal. Some Democrats voiced support. But on Monday morning, en route to New Orleans where he is due to address a farming convention, Trump told reporters he had rejected Graham's suggestion. 'I'm not interested,' he said of the senator's proposal. 'I want to get it solved. I don't want to just delay it. I want to get it solved.'"

Ariel Edwards-Levy at the Huffington Post: Most Americans Hold Trump Responsible for Government Shutdown, New Polls Show. (As well they should!) "Most Americans hold [Donald] Trump responsible for the partial government shutdown, according to a slate of just-released surveys, including the fourth wave of HuffPost/YouGov's shutdown tracking poll. The share of Americans who regard the shutdown as “very serious” now stands at a new high of 50 percent... 57 percent of Americans say they hold Trump at least partially responsible for the shutdown, an uptick from the 49 to 51 percent who have said the same in previous weeks."

My profound sympathies to everyone who is already being affected by the shutdown. Please feel welcome and encouraged to leave suggestions in comments for how others can best support those who rely on federal paychecks and/or services.

* * *

John Wagner at the Washington Post: Trump Denies Working for Russia, Calls Past FBI Leaders 'Known Scoundrels'. "Trump on Monday flatly denied that he worked for Russia, and he called FBI officials who launched a counterintelligence investigation to determine whether he did 'known scoundrels' and 'dirty cops.' ...'I never worked for Russia,' Trump said as he prepared to leave for an event in New Orleans, adding: 'Not only did I never work for Russia, I think it's a disgrace that you even asked that question because it's a whole big fat hoax. It's just a hoax.'" ...'He was a bad cop and he was a dirty cop,' Trump said of Comey. The president also attacked former acting FBI director Andrew McCabe as 'a proven liar and was fired from the FBI.' ...Speaking more broadly of FBI leadership at the time, Trump said 'the people doing that investigation were people that have been caught that are known scoundrels. They're ... I guess you could say they're dirty cops.'"


Adrienne Mahsa Varkiani at ThinkProgress: Senate Democrats to Push Vote Blocking Sanctions Relief for Russian Oligarch's Companies. "Minority Leader Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) said on Saturday that sanctions on Oleg Deripaska's businesses should remain in place. He announced that he will force a vote disapproving the Trump administration's decision through a 2017 sanctions law, the Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act, which requires a simple majority vote. Senate Democrats would need the support of a few Republicans to pass the bill and send it on to the House." This is something Schumer would not have to do if Trump and the Republican leadership weren't beholden to the Kremlin.

Further reminders that it's not just Trump who's compromised and/or voluntarily traitorous...


Betsy Woodruff at the Daily Beast: Kremlin Blessed Russia's NRA Operation, U.S. Intel Report Says. "The Kremlin has long denied that it had anything to do with the infiltration of the National Rifle Association and the broader American conservative movement. A U.S. intelligence report reviewed by The Daily Beast tells a different story. Alexander Torshin, the Russian central bank official who spent years aggressively courting NRA leaders, briefed the Kremlin on his efforts and recommended they participate, according to the report [which also] notes that the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs was fine with Torshin's courtship of the NRA because the relationships would be valuable if a Republican won the White House in 2016."

In related news... Jessica Schneider and Eli Watkins at CNN: Attorney General Nominee Says Mueller Should Be Allowed to Finish Report. "Attorney General nominee William Barr said that, if confirmed, he would let special counsel Robert Mueller finish his investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election and believes the results should be made public. 'On my watch, Bob will be allowed to complete his work,' Barr intends to say to Congress at the start of his Senate hearing Tuesday, according to prepared testimony released on Monday. 'I believe it is in the best interest of everyone — the President, Congress, and, most importantly, the American people — that this matter be resolved by allowing the special counsel to complete his work,' he will say."

On its face, that certainly sounds like good news. Problem is, as I have been saying for more than a year now, Mueller's investigation has effectively, even if not intentionally, created loads of time and space for Republicans to so thoroughly consolidate power that they won't have to care about or even let the public see his conclusions, even if those conclusions recommend serious consequences for Trump and/or anyone else in his administration. The more time Mueller gives them, the more time they'll have to keep consolidating power and, not incidentally, stacking the judiciary. Barr, who by the way is old friends with Mueller, knows this. Of course he's happy to give Mueller all the time in the world.

The question for Senate Democrats during Barr's hearing is not whether he'll allow Mueller to finish, but whether he will support public disclosure of his findings, whenever they are delivered.

* * *

[Content Note: Anti-choicery]


Lindsay King-Miller at Rewire.News: The Real Question Now May Not Be How to Save Abortion Rights, but How to Prepare for Their Absence.
Having written about abortion rights and their opponents since the mid-2000s, including for Rewire.News, journalist Robin Marty was quick to dispense with hand-wringing over the future of Roe; as she sees it, an overturn is now inevitable.

Kennedy's retirement "was essentially a signal saying Roe v. Wade was up for grabs," she told me over the phone.

Marty's thread [on the subject] quickly garnered enough attention that she turned it into a HuffPost article, and then a book proposal, and then a book. After a breakneck round of drafting and editing, Handbook for a Post-Roe America will be available January 15.

...Much of what Marty discusses will not be new to those already involved in pro-choice organizing, but for people who have never considered the possibility of a world without Roe, her analysis is accessible without oversimplifying. She separates the feasible from the counterproductive: "Yes, buying a bunch of [emergency contraception] feels like a really proactive way to stick it to Trump and the rest of the anti-abortion politicians. But remember, most EC has a shelf life of three to four years, and in some cases the clock may already be ticking."

Throughout the book, Marty also points out the ways in which racism, poverty, and other oppressions restrict access to abortion beyond what is specified in the law. She highlights the importance of a reproductive justice framework that "goes far beyond just reproductive health and rights to highlight the intersections of race, class, gender, socioeconomic status, immigration status, religion, and the other intersections of women and people's lives."

...As reproductive rights organizers have insisted for generations, Handbook points out that making abortion illegal "does not stop people from seeking it, it only divides them into those who have the resources to find a safe abortion where it is legal, and those who attempt illegal abortions with a variety of success." And despite the specter of wire coat-hangers and "back-alley" abortions hanging over any debate about reproductive rights, Marty acknowledges that self-managed abortions, particularly medication abortions, are a safer and more viable option today than in decades past.

Handbook is cautious about emphasizing that it does not offer medical advice, but merely reproduces information that is available elsewhere. "I definitely talked to some lawyers," Marty told me with a laugh. Nonetheless, Marty does offer detailed explanations of various approaches to self-managed abortion, including reprinting a diagram explaining how to make a vacuum aspirator to perform the early abortion procedure called menstrual extraction.

The overall focus of the book, however, is less about preventing or ending unwanted pregnancies than it is about maintaining abortion access wherever possible.
And finally, in partial good news... AP at the Guardian: Judge Blocks Trump Administration Contraception Rule. "A judge in California on Sunday blocked from taking effect in 13 states and Washington D.C. Trump administration rules which would allow more employers to opt out of providing women with no-cost contraception. Judge Haywood Gilliam granted a request for a preliminary injunction by California, 12 other states, and Washington D.C. The plaintiffs sought to prevent the rules from taking effect as scheduled on Monday while a lawsuit against them moved forward. But Gilliam limited the scope of the ruling to the plaintiffs, rejecting their request that he block the rules nationwide."

At least it's something.

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

Today in Anti-Choice Terrorism

[Content Note: Anti-choicery; harassment; intimidation.]

Bearing in mind the previous item, about the Trump Regime empowering their base of violent bigots to 3D-print unlicensed and untraceable guns, it's terribly chilling to contemplate the escalating violence toward abortion providers, against whom anti-choicers have waged a long-running terrorist campaign ignored by presidents of both parties.

Teddy Wilson at Rewire.News reports on the latest in Indiana, where former governor and current vice president Mike Pence oversaw sustained attacks on abortion providers and abortion-seeking people:

Residents in a pair of Indiana neighborhoods were recently mailed flyers that disclosed the home addresses and included photographs of physicians who provide abortion care at clinics operated by Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky (PPINK), as part of a campaign by anti-choice activists to target abortion provider for harassment.

Operation Save America (OSA), the radical anti-choice group with a history of similar acts of targeted harassment of abortion providers, produced the flyers in conjunction with a conference being sponsored by the organization this week in Indianapolis, Indiana.

Anti-choice activists have often used mailers and flyers with graphic images and inflammatory rhetoric to target abortion providers.

Harmony Glenn, a member of the Leadership Team of Indy Feminists, told Rewire.News that while she was not surprised, she was angered by anti-choice activists' invasion of the privacy of abortion providers.

"I find myself unable to be surprised anymore by what groups like OSA are willing and able to do in the name of their cause," Glenn said. "Nobody should have to worry that when they go home their home isn't safe, especially doctors and providers who are facing more than enough [harassment] at work."

There has been a massive surge in violent actions against abortion providers. There were more than three times as many incidents of trespassing, obstruction, and blockades of abortion clinics in 2017 than in the previous year, according to a report by the National Abortion Federation (NAF).
Which is precisely the point. Anti-choicers are waging a terrorist campaign designed explicitly to terrorize healthcare providers so they will stop their work; clinic staff so they will quit their jobs; patients so they will not seek legal healthcare procedures.
James Farrar, a pastor of Aletheia Church and a speaker at OSA's conference, told the Indianapolis Star the flyers were intended to inform residents that one of their neighbors "makes their living by killing children," and dismissed concerns that the public disclosure could affect the safety of the physicians and their families.
Of course he dismissed those concerns, because that's the entire objective. He and his co-conspirators use incendiary language with the hope that it will provoke someone into doing violence from which they will then distance themselves.

It's textbook stochastic terrorism, and they continue to get away with it because we have indulged the disgusting and dangerous pretense that "both sides have equally valid views" on abortion for longer than I've been alive.

Open Wide...

Trump's War on Immigrants: The Latest

[Content Note: Nativism; abuse; dehumanization.]

Donald Trump's war on immigrants — migrants, refugees, undocumented, documented, and naturalized citizens — continues to expand in scope with each passing day and is doing untold harm to countless immigrant families. Here is some of the latest news.

1. Miriam Jordan, Katie Benner, Ron Nixon, and Caitlin Dickerson at the New York Times: As Migrant Families Are Reunited, Some Children Don't Recognize Their Mothers.

One mother had waited four months to wrap her arms around her little boy. Another had waited three months to see her little girl again.

When the reunions finally happened Tuesday in Phoenix, the mothers were met with cries of rejection from their children.

"He didn't recognize me," said Mirce Alba Lopez, 31, of her 3-year-old son, Ederson, her eyes welling up with tears. "My joy turned temporarily to sadness."

For Milka Pablo, 35, it was no different. Her 3-year-old daughter, Darly, screamed and tried to wiggle free from her mother's embrace.

..."I want Miss. I want Miss," Darly cried, calling for the social worker at the shelter where she had been living since mother and daughter were separated by federal agents at the southwestern border.

The tearful reunions — ordered by a court in California — came as the government said that it would release hundreds of migrant families wearing ankle bracelet monitors into the United States, effectively returning to the "catch and release" policy that [Donald] Trump promised to eliminate.

...As Ms. Lopez and Ms. Pablo waited at a Greyhound station to board eastbound buses, their children called each other sister and brother. They were yet to utter the word "mami," Spanish for mother, to the women cuddling, stroking, and feeding them. But they were calmer, the mothers said.

Darly, who had been potty-trained before the separation, had regressed to diapers. Ederson bounced up and down on his mother's lap and downed Doritos with gusto. All of the adults were fitted with ankle monitors.
Sob. I wish every person who inexplicably believes that everything is fine now that Trump says he's going to "reunite families" would read this story and understand how profoundly wrong they are. The separations have caused lasting trauma, to both children and parents. And that's in cases where families can be reunited, which does not represent remotely all of the cases of separation.

Far, far too many people received news of Trump's garbage executive order as a permission slip to get out of having to pay attention anymore, if they were even paying attention in the first place.

2. Justin Glawe and Adam Rawnsley at the Daily Beast: Government Told Immigrant Parents to Pay for DNA Tests to Get Kids Back, Advocate Says. "U.S. government officials recently told four immigrant women that they must pay for DNA tests in order to be reunited with their children, according to the shelter that housed the women. The tests are the latest ad hoc effort by the Trump administration to reunite families it had separated — in some cases because authorities took documents from adults proving they are related to their children. The tests are being administered by a private contractor on behalf of the Department of Health and Human Services' Office of Refugee Resettlement, which oversees the care and housing of children. HHS has refused to name the contractor, which may be a violation of federal law."

As you might have guessed, many immigrant parents don't have the funds to pay for those DNA tests, which cost hundreds of dollars, so the shelter at which they're staying is having to foot the bill. Iliana Holguin, an immigration attorney who works with the shelter, said: "The government wants the parents to foot the bill for the DNA testing when they're the ones that caused the need for DNA testing. It's incredible."

3. E.A. Crunden at ThinkProgress: Immigration Fears Loom Large Amid Raging Wildfires in the West. "One blaze [in Colorado] is on course to become the second largest in state history. Almost a third of the nearly 50 wildfires currently burning in the United States are in Colorado and numerous evacuation notices have been issued for impacted areas. But many immigrants in the state would rather deal with the fire than the possibility of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents. The fires are breaking out in the midst of an increasingly hardline immigration crackdown by the Trump administration. While undocumented immigrants have always faced hurdles during natural disasters — including last year, when Hurricane Harvey devastated the Texas coast — the current political environment is looming large as many are forced to make heart-wrenching decisions."

4. Sam Levin at the Guardian: 'They Thought They'd Die': ICE Shackled Women for Hours in Hot Van, Suit Says. "Immigration authorities in California shackled nine women in a hot windowless van for hours, causing them to struggle for breath, faint, and vomit, according to a new lawsuit that details claims of extreme suffering during a day-long journey last year. The American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California, which filed the suit on Tuesday, alleged that the women were also denied food and water for roughly 12 hours during a 24-hour journey on a hot summer day in 2017, and that they experienced physical injuries, medical complications, and psychological damage during the protracted transfer. 'The women all thought they were going to die, that they were going to experience their last breath together in that van,' said Vasudha Talla, an ACLU staff attorney. 'The stench, the heat, the crying, the screaming — it was very traumatic for the women,' Talla said, adding that the women were 'treated like cargo.'"

5. Samantha Michaels at Mother Jones: The Feds Are Locking up Immigrant Kids — Who Have Committed No Crimes — in Juvie. "Shenandoah is one of three juvenile detention centers in the United States where the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) sends unaccompanied minors who are believed to require higher security. Last month, Virginia's governor ordered an investigation of Shenandoah after children claimed guards had broken their bones and strapped them to chairs with bags over their heads. Immigrant kids detained there say they have been beaten while handcuffed and isolated for long periods in solitary confinement. 'They treat us like criminals,' Alonzo explained in a recent court filing."

Treated like cargo. Treated like criminals. Treated like animals. These are descriptions of people who are being routinely dehumanized by the United States government.

6. Jamiles Lartey at the Guardian: Officials Admit They May Have Separated Family — Who Might Be U.S. Citizens — for up to a Year. "The Department of Justice told a federal judge Tuesday that it may have mistakenly separated a father and toddler who could both be U.S. citizens for as long as a year, in the process of enforcing the Trump administration zero-tolerance immigration policy. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) called the revelation 'horrific' and blamed the administration's poor execution of the practice of family separations. 'The fact that a citizen got caught up in this mess shows just how poor the government's record-keeping was, and this is just the latest example,' said Lee Gelernt, the deputy director of the ACLU's Immigrants' Rights Project."


I mean, it wasn't a white family of possible U.S. citizens who were separated and detained by accident. That said, this wanton hostility toward the concept of citizenship, unless it is held by the "right" people, means that whiteness won't protect anyone who gets on the wrong side of the Trump Regime, either. At some point. Sooner than we probably expect.

7. Rebekah Entralgo at ThinkProgress: HHS Secretary Says Separating Immigrant Families Is 'One of the Great Acts of American Generosity'.
The same day the federal government missed a court-imposed deadline to reunite roughly 84 children under the age of 5 with their families — after being forcibly separated from them at the U.S.-Mexico border — Secretary of Health and Human Services Alex Azar appeared on CNN to defend how his agency has handled the recent immigration crisis.

"We have nothing to hide about how we operate these facilities," Azar told CNN's Wolf Blitzer Tuesday night, referring to the juvenile and "tender age" facilities in which many of the separated children are currently being detained, which HHS officials have barred media outlets and public figures from filming or visiting unannounced.

Speaking to the conditions in which the children are being held, he added, "It is one of the great acts of American generosity and charity, what we are doing for these unaccompanied kids."
Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck youuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu, man.

Not only is Azar saying something breathtakingly indecent here; he's also sneakily misrepresenting who these kids are. They are not "unaccompanied" minors, which refers to children who reach the U.S. border on their own, but children whom the Trump regime has forcibly separated from their parents.

Liars. Vile, despicable liars, all of them.

Make noise. Make your calls. Make a plan. Please support immigrant families, in whatever way you can.

Open Wide...

Trump's War on Immigrants: The Latest

[Content Note: Nativism; abuse; misogyny.]

Donald Trump's war on immigrants — migrants, refugees, undocumented, documented, and naturalized citizens — continues to expand in scope with each passing day and is doing untold harm to countless immigrant families. Here is some of the latest news.

1. This morning, before Trump departed for Brussels, he made remarks on the lawn of the White House, during which he admonished migrants and refugees at the southern border to solve the problem of family separations by not seeking refuge in the United States, a message he communicated in the cruelest and most dishonest way possible.

Transcript: Well, I have a solution: Tell people not to come to our country illegally. That's the solution. Don't come to our country illegally. Come like other people do. Come legally.

[reporters shout questions]

I'm saying this very simply: We have laws; we have borders. Don't come to our country illegally. It's not a good thing.

And as far as ICE is concerned, the people that are fighting ICE, it's a disgrace! These people go into harm's way; there is nobody under greater danger than the people from ICE. What they do to MS-13, and everything else, so, we oughta support ICE, not do what the Democrats are doing.

Democrats want open borders, and they don't mind crime. We want no crime, and we want borders where borders mean something, all right?

And remember this: Without borders, you do not have a country. Thank you, everybody. Thank you.
Absolutely chilling. In just over a minute, the president lied that immigrants are approaching the border "illegally," when in fact Border Patrol is denying asylum-seekers access to ports where they can legally request refuge; lied that he welcomes "legal" immigrants, when his administration is in the process of setting up an office to strip documented immigrants of their citizenship; lied about what the Democrats want and support, while casting us as enemies of the state; and generally using rank nativist and vile othering language.

2. Josh Gerstein at Politico: Judge Rejects Trump Request to Alter Agreement on Release of Immigrant Kids. "A federal judge has turned down [Donald] Trump's request to alter a decades-old legal settlement to allow long-term detention of children who entered the U.S. illegally with their parents. Los Angeles-based U.S. District Court Judge Dolly Gee dismissed as 'tortured' the Trump administration's legal argument to get out from under the so-called Flores consent decree agreed to in 1997, dictating that children in immigration detention not be held more than 20 days."

That's good news, except for the fact that presumably the Trump administration will just ignore this ruling and conceal evidence of their lawbreaking. Which, if exposed, would result in no consequences, anyhow, because who's going to hold them accountable?

3. [CN: Loss of wanted pregnancy; misogyny; abuse] Ema O'Connor and Nidhi Prakash at BuzzFeed: Pregnant Women Say They Miscarried in Immigration Detention and Didn't Get the Care They Needed. "The new ICE directive states that women are not to be held into their third trimester and that ICE is responsible for 'ensuring pregnant detainees receive appropriate medical care including effectuating transfers to facilities that are able to provide appropriate medical treatment.' But BuzzFeed News has found evidence that that directive is not being carried out. Instead, women in immigration detention are often denied adequate medical care, even when in dire need of it, are shackled around the stomach while being transported between facilities, and have been physically and psychologically mistreated."

Fucking hell. There is much, much more at the link.

I am so filthy fucking angry. So, apparently the idea is to force detained teenage girls to carry to term pregnancies they don't want, because every sperm is sacred, but not so sacred that they're willing to provide adequate medical care to detained women with wanted pregnancies. And any baby that is born to a detained woman will be immediately separated from her, because "zero tolerance," unless they are sent together to a family internment camp, possibly in the roasting desert heat.

None of that is hyperbole or alarmism. That is what is happening, in this country, right now.

4. Lara Seligman at Foreign Policy: Pentagon Says It Won't Pay for Housing of Immigrants. "The U.S. Defense Department made clear Monday that it would not foot the bill for the housing of some 32,000 detained immigrants whom the Trump administration wants sheltered at military installations as part of its 'zero tolerance' enforcement policy on America's border with Mexico. A Pentagon spokesman, Lt. Col. Jamie Davis, said the department would also not be involved in caring for the migrants."

Lest you think the Pentagon is taking a principled stance, nope! They just don't want to use their war machine money to care for human beings, and so they expect to get paid back: "If we are using [Defense Department] people, our machinery, then the expectation is DHS or HHS will reimburse us,” Davis said.

And, in the meantime, much of the housing will continue to be outsourced to private prisons and various other despicable mercenaries.

5. AP at WTOP: Maryland County Jail Profits from Housing Detained Immigrants. "A western Maryland county is turning a profit on its contract with the federal government to house detainees for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The Frederick News-Post reports that the county sheriff's office receives $83 per inmate per day to house immigration detainees at the county jail."

Which is a pretty little penny since a "county audit found that the cost of housing the inmates is anywhere from $21 to $53 per day, depending on how the costs are calculated," and, according to Frederick County Sheriff Chuck Jenkins, the jail houses "anywhere from 35 to 52 ICE detainees" at any given time.

6. Alex Marquardt at CNN: U.S. Army, Citing Security Concerns with Recruiting Program, Discharging Immigrants.
In June, a young Pakistani student studying in Minnesota managed to get his hands on the documents that explained why he wouldn't be allowed to join the United States Army.

The electrical engineering student, who didn't want his name revealed because of fear of reprisals if he goes back to Pakistan, "has the potential to present a security risk" the now unclassified document reads.

But it's not clear exactly what that risk is. The document simply notes "incomplete data and records checks." And in the section "Foreign Ties," the interviewer notes that the student's "cell phone case is an American flag and he has a US Army bumper sticker on his car."

...Exactly how many foreign recruits have been rejected or discharged is unclear, but a number of them have filed lawsuits around the country to contest the decision. The Pentagon says 10,000 people were initially recruited as part of the Military Accessions Vital to the National Interest (MAVNI) program, designed to bring in talented and specialized recruits who could not only provide essential expertise in foreign campaigns, but also help fill gaps at a time when the US military is struggling to meet recruiting goals.

"I found [joining the Army] the most honorable way to become a citizen of a country I've loved since I was five," the young Pakistani man told CNN in a telephone interview. He had signed up to the Army in April 2016, applying to be a power generator mechanic. "I had this deep loyalty toward the US since I was a kid. It was like a fairyland for me," he said.

Like many others, this young man was kept in limbo with little or no information until finally being told he was being rejected. Now, the student not only won't be able to enlist, but his path to citizenship is blocked as well, with a visa expiring in six months and potential deportation looming.
Trump complained bitterly and relentlessly that President Obama was undermining America's reputation and safety around the world, but he is inviting resentment and hatred and mistrust of America more than any other president in history, including George W. Bush, which is really saying something.

And I'm not saying this young man resents or hates or mistrusts this country now. I'm just observing that, if he did, it would be entirely understandable, given how he's been treated. And he is one of many people with good reason. Here and around the world.

7. Michael D'Onofrio at the Philly Tribune: African Immigrants Not Immune to Trump's Aggressive Immigration Policies. "When it comes to [Donald] Trump's aggressive immigration policies, [chief executive officer for the nonprofit African Cultural Alliance of North America] Voffee Jabateh said they are not unexpected. 'One good thing about this president, you don't get no surprises,' he said. 'He tells you outright what he's going to do: Promises made; promises kept.' ...Jabateh said he has noticed negative changes to the immigration system under Trump, which have resulted in an overall more stringent process and increased the level of suspicion from federal officials. 'Any little trigger — things that were not previously part of the process — are being used to put stress and pressure on an immigrant,' he said."

Make noise. Make your calls. Make a plan. Please support immigrant families, in whatever way you can.

* * *

On a related note, I am relieved and glad to hear that all 12 Thai boys, and their coach, who were trapped in a cave system for over two weeks have been rescued.

That said, while I understand why people need something to celebrate (although I find it odd how widely this is being treated as a straightforward feel-good story, despite several divers having lost their lives in the rescue), I am deeply disturbed by the amount of attention this story is getting in the U.S. and the outpouring of concern I have seen for those children relative to the attention and concern I see directed toward children being detained at the southern border in our own country.

Those children need saving, too. Urgently.

Open Wide...

Two Terrible SCOTUS Rulings

[Content Note: Islamophobia; nativism; war on agency; misogyny.]

Goddammit. The Supreme Court issued two absolutely abysmal ruling this morning.

In NIFLA v. Becerra, the majority blocked a California law which required anti-choice nonprofits to inform pregnant patients about the availability of free or low-cost abortions elsewhere and disclose their inability to provide healthcare services and medical assistance. In other words, the law required anti-choice outfits masquerading as clinics to disclose that they aren't actually clinics at all.

But SCOTUS struck down the law, because free speech. The complete decision [PDF].

In a just world, this ruling would make it harder for anti-choice legislators and their "force doctors to lie to patients" laws. But this isn't a just world, so that isn't going to happen.

Instead, anti-abortion outfits will be allowed to lie to patients because free speech, and doctors will be forced to lie to patients because fetuses are valued more highly than the people carrying them.

In Trump v. Hawaii, the majority sided with the Trump administration in its arguments in defense of the Muslim ban, holding than the ban "is within president's authority under immigration laws and challengers are unlikely to prevail on establishment clause claim because the ban is justified by legitimate national-security concerns."

The complete decision [PDF].

Fucking hell. This administration is just a relentless nightmare. Sob.

Open Wide...

Trump to Launch New Assault on Abortion Access

[Content Note: War on agency; rape culture.]

The Trump administration is planning to announce a new rule that would withhold federal funding from any healthcare facility that supports abortion or refers patients to facilities that perform abortions.

Julie Hirschfeld Davis and Maggie Haberman at the New York Times report on the rule, a "top priority of social conservatives," e.g. Mike Pence:

The policy would be a return to one instituted in 1988 by President Ronald Reagan that required abortion services to have a "physical separation" and "separate personnel" from other family planning activities. That policy is often described as a domestic gag rule because it barred caregivers at facilities that received family planning funds from providing any information to patients about an abortion or where to receive one.

Federal family planning laws already ban direct funding of organizations that use abortion as a family planning method. But conservative activists and Republican lawmakers have been pressing Alex M. Azar II, the secretary of health and human services, to tighten the rules further so that abortions could not occur — or be performed by the same staff — at locations that receive Title X federal family planning money.

Dawn Laguens, the executive vice president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, called the new proposal "outrageous" and "dangerous."

The policy, she said in a statement late Thursday, is "designed to make it impossible for millions of patients to get birth control or preventive care from reproductive health care providers like Planned Parenthood. This is designed to force doctors and nurses to lie to their patients. It would have devastating consequences across this country."
Which, of course, is the entire point.

The new rule will certainly be challenged in court. The question is whether the Trump administration and Republican Party will have successfully stacked the lower courts — and/or Supreme Court — by that time, to guarantee a victory for the anti-choice brigade.

I know I'm the brokenest of broken records, but: Abortion is healthcare. It is a legal healthcare procedure, to which women and other people who can get pregnant must have access.

What abortion isn't is "murder." What abortion isn't is a diabolical ethical quandary that can't be resolved because people can't agree about "when life begins."

Eve granting the faulty premise that a fetus has the equivalent value of the born uterus-having person carrying it, I will observe (again) that my life, right now, is not so precious that any other human being could be compelled to use their body to support mine for the next nine months (at least). No other human being is obliged to give up an organ for me, even if it would save my life. Nor bone marrow, nor blood, nor skin. People who are forced to carry an unwanted pregnancy to term are being asked to do something no other people are asked to do for another person, which exposes the truth of the anti-choice position: Fetuses are valued more highly than the people who carry them.

Here, then, is how we resolve this disagreement: By not making an exception for the sustenance of fetal life that we make for no other life.

It isn't as though there isn't precedent in our existing law and culture. We institutionally value lives differently, some more than others, all the time. We value lives of U.S. citizens more than the lives of people who aren't. We value the lives of inmates less than the lives of the free population (among whom are many highly-rewarded perpetrators of white-collar crimes). We value the lives of the wealthy more than the poor. We value the lives of people we allow to live without healthcare access less than the lives of those who by fate or fortune have health insurance. And these are only the valuations that can and do routinely mean a visible difference between life and death.

Which is to say nothing of all the kyriarchal valuations of lives that have repercussions small and large and sometimes deadly, too.

(We also wisely value some lives over others for complex reasons, like the life of the highly-protected U.S. President over the life of an average citizen.)

But the people who are in the seats of power that legislatively prioritize U.S., supposedly law-abiding, wealthy, healthcare-having lives over others are largely very privileged men. And we are expected to understand that their agreement to globally prioritize their own lives over everyone else's is Moral Values, and an individual woman's choice to value her life over a fetus is murder.

The "when does life begin" debate is nothing but smoke and mirrors to obfuscate the reality that we routinely make valuations about different lives, some rightly and some wrongly. It is an attempt to pretend that abortion is an entirely unique scenario, and thus cannot be easily resolved. And no one knows this better than the architects of the anti-choice movement, who qualify fetal life as "innocent life," as opposed to the soiled lives of, say, the people whose lives were cut short because we lacked the political will to fund effective levees or repair a crumbling bridge.

It is the worst kind of intellectual dishonesty to indulge this garbage argument about irreconcilable disagreement over when life begins. It doesn't matter even if life does begin at conception. The calculus thus becomes which life matters more, which is an assessment we are willing to make in dozens of other situations across our political and cultural landscape.

We must actually value the actual lives of actual people who have actually been born over fetuses.

That wouldn't even be debatable if the people in question weren't almost exclusively women.

The question is not really when life begins. The question is whether we recognize women and other people with uteri as humans whose lives have intrinsic value and the rights of agency, bodily autonomy, and consent. It is only because such a vast swath of our population cannot or will not answer a resounding and unqualified "yes" to that question that there is even space for a reprehensible debate about when life begins.

The "real problem" has never been some tedious, specious, allegedly unresolvable debate about when life begins — an argument which is resolved by centering the humanity, agency, bodily autonomy, and consent of women. The "real problem" is that social conservatives' position makes evident that the anti-choice movement is an extension of the rape culture, which seeks to strip women of precisely those things.

I have previously noted on many occasions that I'm hard-pressed to see why I should be any less contemptuous of a man (or woman) who sits at a big mahogany desk in a government building making decisions about my body without my consent than I should be of the man who used physical force to make decisions about my body without my consent.

It is an observation by which anti-choice folks are outraged. They are horrified to be compared, even obliquely, to sexual predators. As well they should be. I am horrified to have to make it. But anyone who holds the position that they should be able to legislate away my bodily autonomy and supersede my consent about what happens to my body shouldn't be too goddamned surprised by the comparison.

One must be ridiculously incapable of self-reflection to simultaneously argue that sexual assault (forcing a woman to do something with her body she doesn't want to do) is a Terrible Thing, but the denial of abortion (forcing a woman to do something with her body she doesn't want to do) is a Moral Imperative.

Suffice it to say I'm decidedly unimpressed with the sanctimonious social conservatives who have empowered a confessed serial sex abuser to enact a rule that denies women the right of consent over what happens to our bodies.

I don't need an ethics lecture from these oppressive scolds. I need a goddamn apology.

Open Wide...

Iowa Legislature Passes "Heartbeat" Abortion Bill

[Content Note: War on agency; anti-choice oppression.]

The Iowa legislature's Republican majority has passed a bill that would ban abortions after the point at which a fetal heartbeat can be detected, which is around the sixth week of pregnancy and often before many women et. al. know they are pregnant. No Democrats voted for the bill, which now goes to the desk of Republican Governor Kim Reynolds.

"The time is now," bill manager Rep. Shannon Lundgren, R-Peosta, said early Tuesday afternoon when debate started on Senate File 359 that started in 2017 as a prohibition on the transfer of fetal body tissue. At about 11 p.m., the House passed the bill 51-46 and sent it to the Senate where debate started shortly before 1 a.m.

It's time for the GOP to "quit playing doctor and stop using your positions of power to harass, control, and disrespect Iowa women," Sen. Joe Bolkcom, D-Iowa City, said. And Sen. Liz Mathis, D-Hiawatha, said the bill isn't about reducing the number of abortions. Instead, its sponsors seem "hell-bent on making a name for those who are set to challenge Roe v. Wade," she said.

"Never mind how women's rights will be run over by the Family Leader bus that's headed to the U.S. Supreme Court," Mathis said.

Even though it was the middle of the night, Sen. Rick Bertrand, R-Sioux City, who led a group of Republicans who refused to vote for budget bills until getting a chance to vote for the fetal heartbeat bill, said it was a "good day for life."

He acknowledged this bill is an attempt to "take another run at Roe v. Wade," he said about the 1973 Supreme Court decision to allow abortion, and predicted the bill will be the vehicle for overturning that decision. "We're not hiding that."
Grim stuff.

Presuming Reynolds signs the bill into law, as she is expected to do, the law will be challenged in court. Which is precisely what its supporters are hoping.

And once again, the future of reproductive rights hangs in the balance. But do tell me again how there was "no difference" between an abusive misogynist with zero respect for women's agency and consent who chose as his running mate one of the most virulently anti-choice politicians in the nation, and a feminist who has spent her life advocating for healthcare access, including and especially reproductive healthcare.

Seethe.

Open Wide...

Heinous Radical Anti-Choice Law Passes in Indiana

There is a reason I call Indiana the Conservative Legislation Lab: As I've said many times before, if you want to know what garbage policies are coming down the conservative pipeline, look no further than Indiana, where Hoosiers are used as guinea pigs by the American Legislative Exchange Council, aka ALEC, which has a massive influence in the state, to test out the latest and greatest in Republican governance theory.

The Republican takeover in Indiana has been extraordinary. And people who sneer at Hoosiers from outside the state (where I grew up and lived most of my life) to simply vote out the Republicans, who are the majority, or to vote in better Democrats, don't understand what the population is facing there.

Like everywhere else: Gerrymandering and voter suppression and dark money and ratfucking. But also the cutting edge in authoritarian consolidation of power. See: Mike Pence and Glenda Ritz.

And it's not like Indiana doesn't have decent Democrats in state office. To the contrary: In 2011, Hoosier Dems fled the state to deny the Indiana House of Representatives the required quorum needed to pass a union-busing "right-to-work" bill. They were in hiding out of state for nearly six weeks, only returning once the Republican majority agreed to take the bill off the table — and after having held out while Republicans fined them and suspended their pay.

It's also important to understand that the Republican-held legislature routinely acts in contravention of the majority of the people in the state. Just one of many examples was 2014's same-sex marriage ban, which was proposed despite the fact that Indiana already had a state law restricting same-sex marriage; despite the fact that legislators were acting in flagrant disregard of the will of the people, who by a clear majority did not want such an amendment added to their state constitution; and despite the fact that, instead, a majority of Hoosiers wanted the existing ban repealed.

All of this is backdrop to the latest bit of heinous fuckery passed into law in Indiana, so you can understand what progressives are up against in the state:


Not only does the law require healthcare providers to launch an abortion inquiry, but it further requires healthcare providers to report "abortion complications" to the state:
A new state law directs Indiana doctors and hospitals to investigate every time a woman seeks treatment for a physical or psychological condition whether she previously had an abortion that is in any way connected to the ailment.

If so, the care provider is obligated starting July 1 to submit a detailed "abortion complications" report to the State Department of Health, or risk being charged with a Class B misdemeanor, punishable by up to six months in jail and a $1,000 fine, for each instance of noncompliance.

Republican Gov. Eric Holcomb, who routinely describes himself as "pro-life," approved Senate Enrolled Act 340 with little fanfare Sunday afternoon prior to departing on a three-day Canadian trade mission.

He said similar reporting requirements already are in place in 27 states and exist solely to gather information about abortion complications, without restricting access to the procedure.

Indiana's new law, however, employs a broad definition of abortion complication that ranges from an immediate physical injury due to a surgical abortion to psychological or emotional pain, including anxiety and sleeplessness, that arises possibly years or decades after having an abortion.

Under the statute, doctors who identify an abortion complication must then report to the state: the patient's age, race, and county of residence; the type, date, and location of the abortion; a list of each complication and treatment; the date of every visit to every doctor relating to the complication; and any abortion drugs used by the patient and how they were procured.
This is utterly despicable. It needs national attention. I hope people will amplify what is happening, as the ACLU considers whether to mount (yet another) challenge to (yet another) heinous anti-choice law passed in Indiana.

And I hope that as people do amplify it, they convey the reality of what Hoosiers are facing in their state, instead of making shitty jokes about Republican voters getting what they deserve or casually admonishing progressives to move, which isn't always possible and which shouldn't be a requirement, anyway. No one should have to abandon their home to be safe from autocratic abuses of power.

Tell this story. And tell it in a way in which you align yourself with Hoosier resistance, not in a way in which you stand outside their struggle and shame them for being victimized by the same party that threatens us all, in every corner of this country.

Open Wide...