Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts

Amy McGrath to Challenge Mitch McConnell for His Senate Seat

Retired Marine Lieutenant Colonel and combat pilot Amy McGrath has announced that she is running against Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, and I am ALL IN WITH AMY.

Video Description:

Text onscreen reads: "The Letter." Piano music.

Over video of a white teenage girl with short brown hair sitting at a dining room table handwriting a letter, Amy McGrath says in voiceover: "I was thirteen years old, and I knew exactly what I wanted to do with my life. I sat at this table, and I wrote a letter to my senator, telling him I wanted to fly fighter jets in combat, to fight for my country, and that women should be able to do that."

McGrath, a 44-year-old white woman with short brown hair, appears onscreen, speaking to camera: "He never wrote back. I'm Amy McGrath, and I've often wondered how many other people did Mitch McConnell never take the time to write back — or even think about."

A middle-aged white couple sit at a table; the man is handwriting a letter. He is identified by text onscreen as Pat Roberts of Boyd County, Kentucky. In voiceover, McGrath says: "A second-generation steelworker, who found out his mill is shutting down, leaving no jobs behind."

A Black woman sits at a table handwriting a letter. She is identified by text onscreen as Ann Young of Bourbon County, Kentucky. In voiceover, McGrath says: "A woman, suffering from diabetes, who fears losing her healthcare and coverage for her preexisting condition."

An older white man sits at a table, handwriting a letter. He is identified by text onscreen as Jimmy Guess of Johnson County, Kentucky. In voiceover, McGrath says: "A coal miner, forced to retire by black lung disease, who's looking for someone to offer more than words."

A young white woman sits in a chair on her front porch, composing a letter on her laptop. She is identified by text onscreen as Kendall Russell of Jefferson County, Kentucky. In voiceover, McGrath says: "A student, who can only afford college as long as she can get her federal loans — and has no idea how she'll pay off the debt."

McGrath again appears onscreen, speaking to camera: "Everything that's wrong in Washington had to start someplace. How did it come to this? That even within our own families, we can't talk to each other about the leaders of our country anymore without anger and blame?"

Over images of Mitch McConnell, McGrath says in voiceover: "Well, it started with this man, who was elected a lifetime ago — and who has, bit by bit, year by year, turned Washington into something we all despise, where dysfunction and chaos are political weapons, where budgets and healthcare and the Supreme Court are held hostage, a place where ideals go to die."

McGrath again appears onscreen, speaking to camera: "I'm running for Senate, because it shouldn't be like this. I learned as a daughter, a mom, a Marine, and a fighter pilot that the mission can never be forgotten, that protecting our democracy requires courage, that our freedoms are never assured, and the best way to lift someone up is a job. The challenge of today is inside each of us: How do we reconcile our belief in basic human decency with our anger at those who block progress at all costs?"

McGrath sits at the table with her husband and children, one of whom is writing a letter. In voiceover, she says: "There is a path to resetting our country's moral compass, where each of us is heard, and we can become, once again, the moral and economic leader of a world in disarray." We see each of the other letter-writers once more. "But to do that," McGrath says, once again speaking to camera, "we have to win this."

Text onscreen: "Amy McGrath | KY 20 | U.S. Senate. Defeat Mitch. Defend Democracy. Please contribute at AmyMcGrath.com."
This. Is. Everything.

I love everything about this: That she correctly identifies the role McConnell has played in destroying the U.S. democracy and undermining functional government. That she says, plainly, he has turned D.C. into "a place where ideals go to die." That she asks: "How do we reconcile our belief in basic human decency with our anger at those who block progress at all costs?" That she is, right out of the gate, taking up space in solidarity with her fellow Kentuckians and would-be constituents. That she has the goddamn courage to take on McConnell in the first place.

I have already donated to McGrath's campaign, and I will do anything and everything I can to support her challenge to McConnell.

Tell everyone you know to get her back. Follow her on Twitter. If you can, donate. Make her name heard. Let's help Amy McGrath defeat Mitch McConnell.

Open Wide...

Supreme Court Rules on Census, Gerrymandering, and Consent Cases

First, the big one for which we were all waiting with baited breath: Whether the Trump Regime would be allowed to add a nativist question to the 2020 census, which could "allow for electorate boundaries throughout America to be redrawn, almost certainly favouring the Republican party" and "result in billions of dollars in federal funds being withheld from some of the most vulnerable communities in America."

The court ruled that they cannot add the citizenship question — but only because their reason for doing it was garbage.


Problem is, I'm not certain at all that wasn't just direction on how to come back with an argument that the Supreme Court would find acceptable.

As SCOTUSblog notes: "For now, the question is out. It is unclear if there is enough time left to add it back in."

So, unfortunately, we may not have seen the end of this fuckery yet.

* * *

Next up: The gerrymandered maps case.

The court ruled that "partisan-gerrymandering challenges to electoral maps are political questions that are not reviewable in federal court, dismissing challenges by Democratic voters to North Carolina congressional map drawn by Republican officials and by Republican voters to 1 district drawn by Democrats in Maryland."

Since when are "political questions" not reviewable in federal court?

Their definition of "politics" is certainly interesting if it doesn't include electoral maps but does include healthcare access, reproductive rights, and same-sex marriage. Cough.

Also, I'm old enough to remember when the Supreme Court gutted the Voting Rights Act six years ago, so.

Cripes.

* * *

And finally: The "assumed consent" case.

The court ruled that "state law assuming driver's consent to blood test for drugs/alcohol, even when driver is unconscious, provides exception to 4th Amendment's warrant requirement, allowing law enforcement to draw blood from unconscious drivers without warrant."

YIKES.

I understand that it's a real fucker to not be able to prove inebriation in the case of driving under the influence when the driver is out for the count, but "the requirement to get consent is inconvenient" isn't a good precedent for ruling that consent is therefore unnecessary.

That is, quite obviously, a gateway to eroding legal protections of consent in many other areas.

Fuck.

Open Wide...

We Can Do Better

I am very tired of hearing people (including one particular Democratic presidential candidate who I'll call Boe Jiden) disgorge sickening aphorisms about how we need to return to how things were pre-Trump.

Actually, no. We need to do way better than that. The United States was not perfect by any stretch of the imagination before Donald Trump was elected.

Many of its flaws were precisely why Donald Trump was elected.

Good grief. Dream bigger.

And, you know, as a general rule: Progressives look forward.

Open Wide...

An Observation

Open Wide...

I (Still) Expect More

[Content Note: Misogyny; sexual harassment.]


One of the gifts of aging, for me, has been increasingly shedding my reflexive compulsion to apologize for goddamned everything, including my very existence.

I still apologize more than I should for things that need no apology from me, but I have no urge at all to apologize for having the expectation that I can cast a vote for a presidential candidate who isn't a shameless fucking creep.

Open Wide...

The 2020 Election Is Going to Be So Ugly

[Content Note: Racism; racist images at shared links; misogyny.]

Brian Schwartz at CNBC reports: "Donald Trump's campaign is looking to beef up its communications team to prepare for an onslaught of attacks from Democrats running in the 2020 campaign, CNBC has learned. Trump's team has been interviewing dozens of candidates for positions ranging from communications director to press secretary."

Positions that will be filled with people dedicated to: 1. Defending Trump; and 2. Attacking his opponents. Emphasis on the latter, given that Trump is the God-King of Projection. That the assertion is these folks are being hired "to prepare for an onslaught of attacks from Democrats," we can safely assume they are actually (primarily) being hired "to prepare for an onslaught of attacks on Democrats."

Meanwhile, here are three other things I read this morning:

1. Will Sommer at the Daily Beast: Hillary Clinton Blackface Hoax Explodes After Virginia Scandals.

2. Jane Lytvynenko at BuzzFeed: This Altered Photo of Women Lawmakers in KKK Hoods Is Spreading and Twitter Is Refusing to Stop It.

3. Ciara O'Rourke at Politifact: Viral Image Falsely Identifies U.S. Congressman as El Chapo.

No, that is not Hillary Clinton in blackface. No, the female lawmakers who wore white to the State of the Union weren't also wearing Klan hoods. No, Nancy Pelosi and Beto O'Rourke were not posing with El Chapo.

But lots and lots and lots of people believe all of those things to be true.

Trump's base in particular are primed to distrust legitimate news sources and believe outrageous claptrap about anyone they perceive to be an "enemy" of Trump. And he is going to continue to foment that distrust at every opportunity.

And we learned from the 2016 Democratic primary that there are a lot of fawning bozos who latch onto a candidate and believe all sorts of ludicrous lies about that candidate's opponent(s), to the point where they even become "unwitting agents" of a foreign adversary interfering in the election.

So there is going to be a lot of subversive election meddling, along with an elevated amount of the usual dirty campaigning, cynical deployment of oppo research, and straight-up ratfucking.

The only thing that will save us is critical thinking and self-control, both of which are in terribly short supply these days.

Open Wide...

Discussion Thread: Election Dread

I don't know about you, but I am starting to get a real case of Election Dread, going into the start of the 2020 presidential election season.

Primarily, I'm dreading witnessing all the evidence that our elections will be neither free nor fair, between foreign interference, Republican voter suppression efforts, inaccessibility of voting, gerrymandering, hacking, and everything else that conspires to undermine our democracy.

It hits me in the gut, hard, every time I think about how indescribably important this election will be, and how unlikely it is to have anything resembling meaningful election integrity or a legitimate outcome.

I'm also dreading the fights that we'll have to navigate between now and Election Day. The vanity candidates and their catastrophic egos. The purity leftists. The wannabe spoilers. The obvious Kremlin agents. The bots. The trolls. The ratfuckers.

I am steeling myself for massive campaigns of vicious misogyny and racism and homophobia that will be waged against many of the Democratic candidates. And for the relentless campaigns of harassment and misogyny and fat hatred and will be waged against me for defending them.

And all of that is just the tip of the iceberg.

I'm dreading it all. And there's nothing I can do about it, except wait.

But I figured I'm not alone, and that it might help just to express this dread. To take it out and look at it together. To remember that we're not in this alone.

So if you're feeling that creeping election dread, too, here's a place for discussion.

Open Wide...

Keep Your Trickle-Down White Male Socialist Revolution

[Content Note: Sexual harassment; white male privilege.]

I don't really know what else to say about the allegations of former Bernie Sanders campaign staffers, regarding sexual harassment and gender-based pay disparities, while working on his campaign, other than that I wish the mainstream media had vetted Bernie back in 2016.

It looks like that's finally being done, so, better late than never I suppose. (Related recommended reading: Aphra Behn's Looking for Bernie series, here at Shakesville).

The central message of Bernie's 2016 campaign was about ushering in a political revolution for ordinary people, a revolution that put economic issues at the forefront, certainly ahead of so-called identity politics.

Since then, the #MeToo movement has reiterated the reality that sexual harassment is a labor issue that disproportionately burdens women and our economic livelihoods.  Simply put, rape culture rigs systems of economic and political power against women.

So, how was it that Bernie Sanders, champion of the ordinary worker, had by his own admission "inadequate" procedures to deal with sexual harassment for the many ordinary people working on his presidential campaign?

Could it have been that Bernie seemed to think that the outcome — the revolution — could trump process; that is, how the revolution was won?

Now, some folks are waiving away these allegations by saying that women are harassed on all campaigns, but that strikes me as an argument to hold our leaders more accountable, not less. I would think the standards would be especially high for a politician, like Bernie, who consistently frames himself as not residing in the same swamp as the rest of America's political class.

Regarding the allegations, Bernie initially said he was "a little busy" running for president to have known about them or a $30,000 discrimination lawsuit payout during his campaign. He has since given a longer apology, but his initial reaction doesn't inspire confidence that he understands the cultural zeitgeist right now or the actual gravity of the problem, especially since some of us remember that he did make time during his 2016 campaign to jet to Rome to meet the Pope, which has to be *chef kiss* something close to peak patriarchy.

Particularly since that bird landed on his podium, many Americans saw Bernie's run as almost divinely ordained. They took it for granted that he was, quite simply, a better human being than his opponent, with voters having consistently perceived him as more honest and trustworthy — virtuous some might say — than Hillary Clinton.

And yet, why?

These assumptions about Bernie's virtue were not widely interrogated by many in the mainstream media who harped on Hillary's likability, transparency, and accountability "problems," many of which they manufactured while posing as objective just-telling-it-like-it-is umpires, while acting awestruck by, and gleeful about, Bernie's "insurgent" campaign that threatened to overtake Hillary's.

A good rule to examine a movement by is, to quote Melissa, ask whether the revolution "implicitly and explicitly include[s] a rejection of misogyny and other intersectional marginalizations. Because if it doesn't, "then you're not staging a revolution: You're staging a change in management."

Jeff Weaver, Bernie's campaign manager, has admitted, “Was [the Bernie 2016 campaign] too male? Yes. Was it too white? Yes."

That about sums it up.

The Bernie revolution simply wasn't designed for women and/or people of color, not specifically or with our meaningful engagement. The thought process largely seemed to be that the white men who disproportionately held the top, highest-paid positions would lead the revolution, which was defined as "Bernie winning." Then, Bernie would generically fix our economic system and the benefits would trickle down onto women and people of color, and boom, the specific problems that women and people of color disproportionately experience would consequently be resolved.

It is such a nice coincidence that keeping white men front and center also aligns with fixing everyone else's problems!

Much of this revolution was magical thinking, but it was precisely what a lot of white people, and cishet white men in particular, wanted to hear. I think that's also a big part of why Bernie got an accountability pass and almost no mainstream vetting in 2016. He was left untouched because he could fulfill the role of the one virtuous candidate in the race, which could be used as a narrative against the woman.

I don't say any of this to gloat. It's true I'm not a fan of Bernie Sanders. I remember precisely when I began disliking him and it was the moment he called his female opponent, Hillary Clinton, "unqualified"  as though she were a generic political candidate, rather than the most qualified presidential candidate in recent history who was nonetheless facing barriers that he, as a white man, has never encountered in his political life.

And, the more I learned about him and listened to him, the more I came to dislike him.

I resent him, now. I resent that he stayed in the 2016 primary for far too long, certainly after it was clear that he had lost. I resent his crusty, one-note stump speech, and I don't want to hear it for two more years — not when we've just had relatively successful 2018 midterm elections with dynamic, new energy. I resent that he never shut down the narrative that the woman only won by cheating. I resent that a lot of his momentum was, simply, because he wasn't the woman.

But, I'm mostly just tired.

I want progressive men to give a fuck about sexual harassment and identity-based pay disparities even if they don't get anything out of it, like say, a second chance to run for president, be a comic, write for TV, or all the other things men get to do more than women because our shit-hole rape culture simply stops mourning the collective loss of women's potential when men abuse them out of the public sphere.

It should have been self-evident to a 70-something white male socialist who was granted, and took, the mantle of America's one true progressive leader that not having effective sexual harassment procedures, and having a "too white" and "too male" campaign, were major problems in 2016.

That he is appearing to somewhat-comprehend this only now, while gearing up for a presidential campaign that he never truly abandoned mostly tells me that Bernie Sanders is simply not the future of the Democratic Party.

Not now, not ever.

Open Wide...

Today in Misogyny Dressed Up as Revolution

I've really just about had it with the "anti-establishment" Dems, by all the different names they go.

In particular, this juxtaposition is doing my head in today:

1. NBC News' Frank Thorp V reports on Twitter: "Sen Chuck Schumer (D-NY) has been re-elected to be Senate Minority Leader by acclamation, per a source familiar."

2. Bo Erickson and Rebecca Kaplan at CBS News: Anti-Pelosi Democrats Confident They Can Keep Her from Becoming House Speaker Again. Of course.

My favorite (cough) line from that article: "The group isn't backing or putting forward an alternative to Pelosi; their sole aim is to ensure she's not elected speaker."

Cool.

During a conversation with the other mods about the "anti-establishment" Dems yesterday, I said: "If you're going to 'tear down the establishment,' you'd better be prepared to build and lead its replacement. These fucking dipshits are clearly unprepared to do either."

Proving me right, over and over.

Also pissing me off is this headline at Talking Points Memo: Pelosi Launches Speakership Charm Offensive, Schmoozes Members-Elect.

How to make BEING A TALENTED AND EFFECTIVE POLITICIAN sound like being a shitty con artist instead. Thanks a heapload, TPM.

Men are savvy politicians playing 12-dimensional chess. Old (experienced) women are shady, inauthentic creeps who must be stopped. Rinse and repeat ad infinitum.

Open Wide...

Midterm Elections: The Latest

The fight for the Arizona Senate seat abandoned by Jeff Flake continued until late yesterday, when Republican Martha McSally conceded the race to Democrat Kyrsten Sinema, giving the Democrats another senate seat and Arizonans some Democratic representation in the Senate! Sinema is also the state's first female senator! WOOT!

Lauren Gambino at the Guardian reports:

At 7.41ET on Monday, six days after the polls closed and as votes were still being counted, the Associated Press declared that Sinema had beaten the U.S. congresswoman Martha McSally... The last time a Democrat was elected to an open senate seat in this conservative western state was 1976, the year Sinema was born.

"Arizonans had a choice between two very different ways forward: one focused on fear and party politics and one focused on Arizona and the issues that matter to everyday families," Sinema said in her victory speech in Scottsdale. "I am so honored that Arizonans chose our vision."
Meanwhile, in California: "Democrats have won two Republican-held California state Senate seats in the Central Valley, giving the party veto-proof supermajorities in both chambers of the Legislature. Vote totals updated since Election Day made winners Monday of Melissa Hurtado and Assemblywoman Anna Caballero." Right on!

In Florida, things continue to drag on endlessly, because Florida elections are a disgrace. Douglas Hanks, Martin Vassolo, and Alex Harris at the Miami Herald: Miami-Dade Is Halfway Through Its Recount; Broward Hasn't Started Yet.
The stark contrast in pace from Florida's two largest sources of ballots highlights the pressure facing Broward as it tries to meet a Thursday afternoon deadline to recount the more than 700,000 votes cast in the largely Democratic county.

As of noon Monday, Broward still had to calibrate its ballot-scanning machines and sort out the ballots needed to be counted, suggesting the actual recount may not start until later in the day or even Tuesday morning.

...When the recount order came from Tallahassee Saturday afternoon, Miami-Dade was able to start recounting within hours. Its nine high-speed ballot counting machines began processing ballots shortly before 6 p.m. Saturday, and have been running 24 hours since. Broward was still testing its machines and sorting out ballot pages through the weekend and Monday morning.

...If Broward were to start its recount at 5 p.m. Monday, it would need to count about 10,200 ballots per hour to meet the 3 p.m. Thursday deadline for counties to turn in their recount results. If the deadline is missed, the original results reported Saturday are what's counted.
Because fates forfend we just give Broward as much time as they need to complete the recount and ensure that the results are accurate!

And in a nightmare repeat of 2000, Dana Chisnell and Whitney Quesenbery at the Washington Post report that "a badly designed ballot might have swayed the election in Florida." Swell.

In Georgia, Stacey Abrams keeps fighting, because she is awesome. Tanya A. Christian at Essence reports:
Just a day after Brian Kemp called Stacey Abrams' attempt to count "all the votes" a "disgrace to democracy," the Abrams campaign filed a federal lawsuit on Sunday to delay vote certifications.

A successful lawsuit would mean that officials would have until Wednesday to tally vote totals, and could restore over 1,000 absentee ballots that were formerly rejected. Abrams believes that these could help to close the gap between her and her opponent.

According to CNN, Abrams' campaign manager, Lauren Groh-Wargo, spoke to reporters via a conference call on Sunday and said, "The race is not over." Adding "It's still too close to call. And we cannot have confidence in the secretary of state's numbers."
No, we cannot. And I am so glad that Abrams is fighting it to the bitter end. That is the very opposite of a "disgrace to democracy." The disgrace to democracy in Georgia is Brian Kemp.

On a final note, I'm hearing an awful lot of "Beto 2020!" stuff, and the longer Abrams fights, the more I wonder why it isn't "Abrams 2020!" that's dominating my social media. Because it damn well should be.

Open Wide...

Midterms 2018: Democrats Win the House


So, let's start with the good news: THE DEMOCRATS WON BACK THE HOUSE! This will put subpoena power back in the Democrats' control, and I can't even wait to see what Rep. Adam Schiff does with it, along with the rest of his tenacious colleagues.

And I'm sure there will plenty of time to be disappointed by all the investigations that don't happen and all the Democrats who try to undermine Nancy Pelosi, but, for the moment, I'm just going to celebrate breaking the Republicans' stranglehold on every branch of the federal government, because that is no small thing!

The Democrats flipped at least 28 House seats last night, and/or won newly drawn districts in de-gerrymandered Pennsylvania, and a majority of the winners were women. It was a pink wave across the country, "with more than 100 women sweeping into office on the strength of a Democratic House takeover powered in large part by college-educated female voters."

A number of Democratic candidates made history last night: Deb Haaland of New Mexico and Sharice Davids of Kansas are the first Native American women elected to Congress, and Davids is also the first openly queer person to win a major office in Kansas; Rashida Tlaib of Michigan and Ilhan Omar of Minnesota are the first Muslim women to serve in Congress; Jared Polis of Colorado is the country's first openly gay male governor; Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is the youngest woman ever elected to Congress at age 29; and Veronica Escobar and Sylvia Garcia are the first Latinas to represent Texas in Congress.


There were some delicious defeats last night, as well: Democracy Killer #1 Kris Kobach lost his bid to be Kansas' governor to Democrat Laura Kelly! The odious Pete Sessions was defeated in Texas by Democrat Colin Allred! Notorious homophobe Kim Davis lost bigly in Kentucky to Elwood Caudill Jr.! And Putin's BFF Dana Rohrabacher got tossed out on his ass by Democrat Harley Rouda! Good riddance, y'all!

A number of progressive items on the ballot passed last night, too: In Florida, voters approved an important measure to restore voting rights to felons; in Massachusetts, voters upheld a critical state law that protects transgender people from discrimination in public accommodations; in Michigan, voters approved a necessary proposal to make voting easier and make elections more secure.

Also in Florida, and close to my heart: Voters overwhelmingly supported an amendment to phase out greyhound racing by 2020. Dudley started his life as a racer in Sarasota, so this means a whole lot to us. And because 11 of the nation's 17 remaining active dog tracks are in Florida, the passage of this amendment effectively means "that the industry will be all but 'swept away in the night,' said Carey Theil, executive director of GREY2K USA, one of the leader backers of the ban." It is a major win for animal welfare.

(This is not a complete list of all the ballot measures that were won by progressives last night. Please feel welcome and encouraged to share in comments what you're celebrating this morning.)

There was, of course, some bad news last night. The Republicans picked up three Senate seats. If you're looking for a silver lining: At least the GOP Senate pick-ups make it much harder for Trump to say the result is illegitimate (as he reportedly threatened to do). And there ain't a lot of practical difference if they've got 50+Pence or 55, when it's virtually impossible to peel off any of them on important votes.

The truth is that it's going to be tough to win the Senate moving forward, because progressive population concentration makes it a steeper uphill battle every election. There were possibly 6 Democratic trifectas last night (winning the governorship, state house, and state senate), which is great — but also scary in that it's an indication of how concentrated progressive voters are getting. The Senate has always been undemocratic, and it's getting increasingly more so.

There were also some very tough losses last night: Beto O'Rourke in Texas; Andrew Gillum in Florida; and maybe Stacey Abrams in Georgia — although she hasn't yet conceded and I hope she doesn't until the very bitter end, through a runoff, through investigations, through whatever it takes to expose Brian Kemp's chicanery. I don't believe for a minute that he didn't steal that race, and I don't think it's the only race where there was election interference, either.

Anyway! That's the broad overview. Lots and lots of other stuff happened, too, so share your thoughts on the good and the bad results in comments.

Open Wide...

Election Night Open Thread


Today is not just Election Day at Shakes Manor — it's also Iain's birthday! The last time the election fell on his birthday, Barack Obama was elected president, so let's hope this birthday election delivers an awesome result, too!

Or even just a good one. Anything on the plus side of the spectrum would make the birthday boy very happy, not to mention the rest of us, lol.

Anyway! The point is: I'm going to be spending time away from the news tonight, and, frankly, given that there's nothing I can do now except wait and fret, it's a good thing that there's something else, especially something pleasant, demanding my attention.

So here is a thread for discussion as the returns roll in. Chat about the results, about the ongoing reports of election interference, about your concerns or hopes, and all other things election.

Open Wide...

ELECTION DAY!

image of me standing outside proudly sporting an 'I Voted' sticker
I VOTED!!!

I'm sure anyone who's spent more than five seconds in this space already knows what a major democracy nerd I am and how voting is the closest thing I have to a religious ritual, so naturally I am VERY EXCITED about the opportunity to vote this morning.

Not everyone in this country who should have that opportunity does have it, and, had I been born at a different time, I wouldn't have had that opportunity, either. I carry that into the voting booth with me. I vote with urgency and pride and determination and rage and hope and lots of other feelings.

I was very happy today that I not only got to vote against Republican candidates, but that I was voting affirmatively for Democratic candidates who I really like, including my governor Tom Wolf! It was all I could do to stifle the urge to yell WHERE'S THE WOLF PACK AT?! and fist-pump with a WOOF WOOF WOOF! on my way out the door.

The turnout was like nothing I've seen since moving here, even despite some fairly dreary weather. We had to park two blocks away. (Yay!) It was overwhelmingly women. And they all looked pisssssssed. (Including me.)

My message for the polls today was decidedly less angry, though.

image of me wearing a green t-shirt that reads 'In a world where you can be anything, BE KIND'

I'm feeling pretty optimistic after voting, but I always do. Here's hoping we get a good result tonight.

*bites nails*

Please feel welcome and encouraged to leave pictures of yourself celebrating having voted in comments! (Please do NOT take/post pictures of your actual ballot, which is against the law in many places.)

Open Wide...

My Nerves Are Rattling Like Ghosts in an Attic About the Midterms Tomorrow

[Previously: Trump Suggests the Midterms Will Be Compromised, I Am Very Worried About the Midterms, I Am (Still) Very Worried About the Midterms, I Remain Very Worried About the Midterms, and Yup, Still Worried About the Midterms.]

First, let me say that I'm hopeful. I am hopeful that there will be amazing turnout on Election Day, and that all the votes cast on the day and all the votes that have been cast via absentee ballots and early voting will be counted fairly, and that the Democrats will at least regain a House majority.

I am still not in the business of telling other people what to do with their vote, but I will tell you what I'm going to do: I am going to vote for Democrats, like my life depends on it, because it just might.

(And as a person with multiple preexisting conditions, including an illness for which I need drugs to keep me alive, who is not independently wealthy, that's not hyperbole.)

I am hopeful that lots and lots of other people are as keen to vote for Democrats tomorrow as I am, and I am hopeful that all the dire predictions about turnout regarding this demographic group or that one are wrongity-wrong. I am hopeful that good people of all stripes will turn up tomorrow.

Now, let me confess that I am incredibly anxious about the outcome of the midterms tomorrow.

I'm anxious about the possibility that there will be election interference from foreign (Russia) and/or domestic (Republicans) actors.

I'm anxious about the fact that federal agencies "have logged more than 160 reports of suspected meddling in U.S. elections since Aug. 1, and the pace has stepped up in recent weeks, when there have been as many as 10 incidents a day," but we're not even having a serious public conversation about it, instead continuing to inexplicably pretend that our elections are secure.

I'm anxious about the certainty that there will be voter suppression, and that the election will not be free and fair, even if there is no additional interference than the gerrymandering, voter roll purges, voter ID requirements, felon disenfranchisement, and other tactics the Republicans have been using to try to steal elections for decades.

I'm anxious about the finger-pointing and blaming that will happen in the immediate aftermath of the midterms, if the "blue wave" that so many folks are certain is coming doesn't actually materialize. I'm anxious about how divisive that will be for an already fragile progressive coalition, and I'm anxious about those narratives taking hold before we even find out if they're valid.

I'm anxious about the fact that I'm beginning to think the worst-case scenario is Democrats winning just the House — which is also the most likely scenario — because winning just the House will still leave them largely impotent, which most people do not understand. (Hell, most people don't understand why the Dems aren't doing more when they're in the minority in all three branches of government.) The Democrats, and very specifically Nancy Pelosi, will be further demonized for a failure to restore our democracy.

(Also: Even if we manage to retake the Senate majority, too — a long shot — we won't have a veto-proof 2/3 majority. The importance of which, again, most people do not understand, in terms of governing power and holding Donald Trump accountable.)

Meanwhile, Trump will declare the election illegitimate and conspiracy theories will spread like wildfire throughout his base that the Democrats and liberals stole the election with "illegals" committing voter fraud.

It's not that I want Democrats to lose the House, of course! I just fear that, even if we win, it's going to be ugly AF. Maybe even uglier, in the short term, than if we lose.

If the Democrats win the House in a squeaker, Trump and the GOP will also use it to undermine the argument regarding election interference and Trump's fealty to Russia, i.e. If the Democrats can win, it's proof that Trump isn't colluding with Russia!

A squeaker in the House could severely undercut Mueller's case. Not actually, but rhetorically.

And I still fear that a close race in which a Democrat wins will somehow be revealed to have been "fixed," turning the narrative back to Trump's contention that it was the Democrats who were colluding all along.

Basically: I'm anxious that we are going to lose either way.

Finally, let me state firmly that I am resolved. No matter what happens tomorrow, it's not going to be the end of our fight to preserve our democracy. In even the wildest, most improbable, best-case scenario tomorrow, Donald Trump will still be president and all the damage he and his party have done won't magically disappear.

We have a long slog ahead of us, regardless of the outcome tomorrow, so I am ready to persist nevertheless, no matter what.

Let's go.

Open Wide...

All the Jumping into All the Christmas Trees

So, I'm reading this article about how the boxer Oscar De La Hoya is thinking about running for president, and I come to this line in the piece: "Although De La Hoya doesn't have any experience in elected office, that didn't stop Donald Trump from winning the 2016 presidential election."

That's just a real sentence that people get to write now, about literally anyone.

Get to write, have to write, feel obliged to write.

Donald Trump has changed an awful lot about this country and its politics in the last few years, none of those changes any good.

Somewhere at the top of the list, even though it may not seem like one of the most important changes (at least not yet), is the normalization of the idea that the United States presidency is an entry-level job.

It is not.

And one might imagine that Trump's disastrous presidency would have made that abundantly clear by now, but apparently not.

Open Wide...

Election Thread

Arizona, Florida, and Oklahoma had primary races yesterday. Here's a thread to talk about any and all of the results that you found exciting or disappointing.

[Content Note: Video may autoplay at link] CBS has a solid round-up of results from all three states.

There's been a lot of attention on the results in the Florida gubernatorial race, where Tallahassee Mayor Andrew Gillum won the Democratic primary to become the first Black candidate for governor in Florida. He will face GOP Rep. Ron DeSantis in the general election, who was backed by Donald Trump. Yuck.

Shaker SKM pointed me to this interesting result out of Oklahoma:


Welp!

Did you vote yesterday? Did your candidates win? Tell all in comments.

Open Wide...

What Could Go Wrong?

Kevin Collier at BuzzFeed: Tech Companies Are Gathering for a Secret Meeting to Prepare a 2018 Election Strategy.

Representatives from a host of the biggest US tech companies, including Facebook and Twitter, have scheduled a private meeting for Friday to share their tactics in preparation for the 2018 midterm elections.

Last week, Facebook's head of cybersecurity policy, Nathaniel Gleicher, invited employees from a dozen companies, including Google, Microsoft, and Snapchat, to gather at Twitter's headquarters in downtown San Francisco, according to an email obtained by BuzzFeed News.

"As I've mentioned to several of you over the last few weeks, we have been looking to schedule a follow-on discussion to our industry conversation about information operations, election protection, and the work we are all doing to tackle these challenges," Gleicher wrote.

The meeting, the Facebook official wrote, will have a three-part agenda: each company will present the work they've been doing to counter information operations; there will be a discussion period for problems each company faces; and a talk about whether such a meeting should become a regular occurrence.
Sure. All of that sounds perfect since they've all definitely been doing a terrific job not catastrophically subverting both elections and journalism, and they've always demonstrated that they've got our best interests at heart what with the excellent job they've done keeping Nazis off their platforms.

Christ.

Open Wide...

An Observation


Also: There's nothing wrong with being a worker bee. I am a worker bee. And I am proud to be one.

Also also: In an era of meddlers, tricksters, spies, and traitors, it's probably a good idea to scrutinize the history of anyone who positions themselves as a leader, especially an indispensible one. Trust the people who have done the work to make themselves trustworthy.

(If you're wondering if this is about a certain resistance leader and her meltdown shitshow, yes, it is.)

Open Wide...

Dreadful. As In: Full of Dread.

I don't even know what to write at the moment. I feel like I'm in a holding pattern, waiting for a very terrible thing to happen, and I don't know if that's going to be Donald Trump firing Rod Rosenstein or dropping bombs on Syria or something else altogether horrible or some combination thereof.

I'm guessing I'm not the only person who's feeling overwhelmed with dread at the moment, so, if you need a space to talk about that, here you go.

Open Wide...

BRB Jumping into Christmas Tree

cartoon image of me looking angry, surrounded by text reading FUCK IT ALL
Current mood. And forever mood. Apparently.

Open Wide...