Showing posts with label culture of violent entitlement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label culture of violent entitlement. Show all posts

We Resist: Day 657

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures (plus the occasional non-Republican who obliges us to resist their nonsense, too, like we don't have enough to worry about) is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Earlier today by me: Midterms 2018: Democrats Win the House and Something Stinks in Florida and Georgia and Trump Is Losing His Shit About the Election, Of Course.

The news is still highly focused on yesterday's election, naturally, so here are some more election items, plus a few other things in the news today...

Ian Millhiser at ThinkProgress with more on The Problem with the Senate That I Keep Talking About: The Senate Is So Rigged That Democrats May Never Control It Ever Again. "In the outgoing Senate — the Senate that placed Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court — the 49 senators in the Democratic 'minority' represent almost 40 million more people than the Republican 'majority.' In the incoming Senate, the Democratic 'minority' will still represent millions more people — despite the fact that Republicans grew their 'majority' last night. And this malapportionment is only going to get worse. By 2040, according to Baruch College's David Birdsell, about 70 percent of Americans are expected to live in just 15 states. That means that the vast majority of Americans will control just 30 percent of the Senate, while the remaining 70 senators are elected by just 30 percent of the nation."

Matt Shuham at TPM: McConnell Warns New House Dem Majority Against 'Presidential Harassment'. "Asked what Senate Republicans would do in the event House Democrats attempt to obtain [Donald] Trump's tax returns, McConnell referenced 'presidential harassment' three times — that is, harassment of the president. ...'So the Democrats in the House will have to decide just how much presidential harassment they think is good strategy,' McConnell said. 'I'm not so sure it'll work for them.'"

Brian Kahn at Earther: Congress' Bipartisan Coalition to Tackle Climate Change Just Collapsed, But That May Be a Good Thing. "The bipartisan Climate Solutions Caucus, known for doing basically nothing but holding meetings, saw its Republican members get decimated. Of the 43 Republicans with voting power, 16 lost their bids for re-election or are in races that haven't been called but lean Democrat. A number have been replaced by scientists who intimately understand climate change, while elsewhere Democrats with big climate ideas won."

Rosalind S. Helderman, Matt Zapotosky, and Carol D. Leonnig at the Washington Post: With the Midterms Over, Mueller Faces Key Decisions in Russia Investigation. "For more than seven weeks, special counsel Robert S. Mueller III has been silent. In the run-up to Election Day, there were no indictments or public pronouncements by the special counsel's office, in keeping with Justice Department guidelines that prosecutors should avoid taking steps that could be perceived as intending to influence the outcome of the vote. With the midterm elections now over, Mueller faces key decision points in his 18-month-old investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 campaign."

* * *

[Content Note: Misogynist violence; domestic violence; injury; death. Videos may autoplay at links. Covers entire section.]

Even as we celebrate the strides made by women in politics, here are three stories I read this morning that are a painful reminder of how dangerous the world still is for women because of toxic masculinity, even and especially at the hands of our intimate partners.

Chris Boyette and Steve Almasy at CNN: Colorado Man Pleads Guilty to Killing Pregnant Wife, Daughters as Part of Plea Deal. "Shanann Watts' body was found in a shallow grave, and the bodies of Bella and Celeste were discovered in commercial oil tanks at a company where Chris Watts had worked. Autopsy results have not been released. In court Tuesday, Watts took responsibility for all three deaths, pleading guilty to nine charges, including first-degree murder and unlawful termination of a pregnancy. In exchange for his pleas, Watts will not face the death penalty, according to Weld County District Attorney Michael Rourke."

As you may recall if you've been following this story, not only did Watts kill the woman to whom he was married and their children, but, at one point, he claimed that he had killed Shannon because she had killed their daughters.

Marlena Baldacci and Darran Simon at CNN: Husband of Florida Woman Who Went Missing at Sea Pleads Guilty to Involuntary Manslaughter. "[Lewis Bennett] reported his wife missing in a distress call to the Coast Guard, who rescued him from a life raft about 30 miles west of Cay Sal, Bahamas, not far from Cuba in May 2017. [Isabella Hellman's] body was never found. On Monday, the 41-year-old Bennett, who is a dual citizen of Australia and the United Kingdom, pleaded guilty to involuntary manslaughter in the death of his wife. ...Hellman's death resulted in part from her husband's 'gross negligence, amounting to wanton and reckless disregard for human life,' prosecutors said. He did not require that his wife wear a life vest or harness despite her inexperience, nor did he deploy flares or turn the boat around to search for her when he couldn't find the 41-year-old real estate agent from Delray Beach, Florida, prosecutors said."

Prosecutors originally sought a second-degree murder charge against Bennett, whose trial was scheduled for December, but they struck the deal for an involuntary manslaughter plea to avoid the cost of a trial. And honestly it sounds like he got off easy, because the only account they have of events is his. For all we know, he killed her and threw her body overboard.

Will Stewart at the Express: Woman Confronts Husband Who Cut Off Her Hands After He Suspected Her of Cheating. "[Margarita Grachyova's] left hand was sewn back on by surgeons, and she now has a robotic right arm which she is learning to use. In emotion-charged scenes in a courtroom in Serpukhov, footage shows how she stood beside her lawyer and fired questions at the man she divorced after he severed her hands. Branded 'evil' by the Russian media, he claimed he wanted her 'forgiveness' but also smirked as he told how he lied to a policeman called Alexander Gruznov, later fired for failing to prevent the barbaric attack."

Grachyova filed a report with Gruznov that Dmitry Grachyov had threatened to drive her into the woods and hurt her with a knife, but when Gruznov questioned Grachyov, he denied it, and Gruznov did nothing.

* * *


Huh.

And finally, in good news... Jonathan Stempel at Reuters: Motel 6 to Pay $7.6 Million for Giving Guest Lists to U.S. Immigration. "Motel 6 will pay up to $7.6 million to Hispanic guests to settle a proposed class-action lawsuit claiming that it violated their privacy by regularly providing guest lists to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents. Terms of the preliminary settlement with eight Hispanic plaintiffs — seven from Arizona and one from Washington state — were disclosed in a Nov. 2 filing with the federal court in Phoenix. Motel 6 also agreed to a two-year consent decree barring it from sharing guest data with immigration authorities absent warrants, subpoenas, or threats of serious crime or harm."

Not objectively good news, since they never should have done that shit in the first place, and they shouldn't need to be told not to share guest data with immigration authorities in the future, for two years or ever again. But it's better than nothing even approaching justice at all.

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

The Lives of Women

[Content Note: Threat of sexual violence; abuse; misogyny.]

This morning, I read this Twitter moment in which a woman recounts her experience of being tricked and creeped-on and intimidated by a man who came to her house ostensibly to purchase an appliance.

It reminded me of the time a plumber came to my house and was thoroughly menacing, which I recounted in a thread:

This thread reminded me of the time a plumber kept trying to corner me in my bathroom, while I was showing him where the problem sink was. The flash of frustrated anger in his eyes when he realized there was a back door that I could slip through (and did).

Men often accuse women of jumping to the worst conclusions, but I kept trying to convince myself he was just "awkward" not creepy, even as he escalated. He complimented my tattoos, while leering at me. He kept talking about my hair. And then he started trying to corner me.

I honestly don't know what would have happened if there hadn't been another door in that bathroom, around a corner, which he hadn't yet seen. I could only get to it by allowing him to think he was cornering me, and it was terrifying.

After he was done with his work, he lingered in my kitchen, leaning on my counter, "doing paperwork." He kept looking around and finding things on which to comment, like the Hillary flyer on my fridge. (This was during the election.)

He talked shit about her. He liked Trump. He licked his lips. I tried to remain as jolly as fucking possible. By this point, my dog was at my side, just looking at him. He kept glancing at her. When I knew he was intimidated by her, I told him to wrap it up. "It's time to leave."

And when he finally left, I slumped in a heap, while the adrenaline drained from my body. I just sat on the floor in the entryway, with my dog lying across my lap, for a long time.

This, friends, was not the only bad/scary experience I've had with men coming to the house in a professional capacity while I'm home alone. It was just the most recent one.

This is something about which I would love to not have anxiety. But some number of men being inappropriate while in my home on a repair/delivery/maintenance job has made that impossible. Having dogs helps.
I knew I'd mentioned this story at Shakesville soon after it had happened, but that I had concealed the extent of it. I went back to find it: "He also stared at my boobs a lot, and commented on my tattoos. I smiled and I said thank you, and he used the excuse of trying to guess how old they were to stare at them a little longer. I made polite conversation, with my back to a closed door. Holding his gaze, like two people just happily chatting, I reached for the doorknob behind my back and held onto it, just in case."

The "just in case" actually happened, but I ended the story there. Like Hannah Gadsby in Nanette, confessing she had minimized a story of an anti-gay assault to make it a palatable joke.

Perhaps part of me was trying to make the story more palatable, but mostly I was trying to avoid precisely the response I got on Twitter today: "I hope that you reported him."

Because I didn't.

And I felt ashamed about that.

So I made it sound like something less bad had happened to me, so no one would blame me for not reporting him.

But I know that I shouldn't feel bad about that. I've tried reporting abusive men before. It has never gone well.

I reported rape to the police and to school authorities and to adults who were meant to protect me, and nothing happened, except that it made my rapist vengeful. I reported sexual harassment to an employer, only to have the only female veep side with the women and get forced out of the firm. I reported abusive repairmen to their boss, only to have him tell me that I was being a real bitch. I reported online threats to my life to federal authorities and was told to go to local police who told me to go to federal authorities. I report (only extreme) abuse on social media and get told more times than not that it doesn't violate the terms of service.

Et cetera ad infinitum.

Today, I replied: "I did not. Because: 1. He kept talking about coming back to my house, which felt menacing. 2. I have learned from experience that reporting a man for being creepy/inappropriate doesn't result in any real consequences for him. It just pisses off a man who knows where you live. I know some people will get angry at me, reading that. I will advise you to redirect your ire where it actually belongs: The institutions that repeatedly protect men when women do try to report them and expose those women to retributive harm. See: The latest SCOTUS battle."

The truth is, I did have to turn that handle and walk through that door to get away from a plumber who was scaring me. And the truth is, I did not report him, because I was scared he would come back if I did, since I have learned that reporting puts me at more risk and does not diminish the risk for other women.

What I did was tell everyone I know locally not to use that plumbing service, and tell them to pass it on. The whisper network. Because official channels don't save us. So we have to save each other.

Anyway. Here is a thread to talk about the things that have happened to you, and the stories you haven't told, or minimized when you did tell them, because you were afraid. Afraid of being hurt, and then afraid of being shamed.

If you need to.

Open Wide...

Today in Toxic Masculinity

[Content Note: Gun violence; auto violence; domestic violence; misogyny; entitlement; disablism.]

On Friday, Dimitrios Pagourtzis killed ten people and injured at least 13 others at Sante Fe high school in Texas.

Sadie Rodriguez, a mother of one of Pagourtzis' victims, 16-year-old Shana Fisher, said that her daughter was his first target, because he was angry that she had humiliated him by publicly rejecting him after he'd aggressively pursued her for four months, despite her repeatedly telling him no.

Sadie Rodriguez said her daughter Shana Fisher had endured "four months of problems from this boy".

"He kept making advances on her and she repeatedly told him no," she told the Los Angeles Times.

...Ms Rodriguez said Mr Pagourtzis had been increasingly aggressive until her daughter stood up to him, embarrassing him in class.

"A week later he opens fire on everyone he didn't like," she said.
Then yesterday, Roger Self, a former police officer turned private investigator in North Carolina, took his family out to brunch, had them seated at a particular table, then left the meal to get into his vehicle and plow it into the restaurant, killing two people, one of whom was his own daughter, Katelyn Self, a deputy sheriff. The other person killed was his daughter-in-law, Amanda Self, an emergency room nurse. One of her daughters, only 13 years old, was among the injured.

According to a pastor and family friend, Self was "wrestling with mental illness" and had been "beset by anxiety, depression, and mental breakdowns," but: "He's been taking precautions. He had all the guns removed from his house, so he was making steps that were rational steps."

Imagine anyone saying about a woman, or a man of color, who tried to kill their entire family that they had been making "rational steps" before they rammed their car into a restaurant where they killed and injured people in addition to their targeted family.
"Family has been loving him through this," the pastor said. "This was not a conscious act by their father, and they know that."
Except, of course, that it was a conscious act. He chose the restaurant, he called the restaurant, he made a reservation, he invited his family, he chose a particular table, he sat down with them, he got up from the table, he left the restaurant, he got in his car, he started it, and then he deliberately drove it through the restaurant.

Let me be clear: Neither anxiety nor depression make people kill their families. They also don't make men decide that their wives and daughters and daughters-in-law and granddaughters are better off dead, or whatever fucked-up reason Self decided to harm his family.

Mental illness can exacerbate toxic masculinity. But it doesn't create it.

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 468

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures (plus the occasional non-Republican who obliges us to resist their nonsense, too, like we don't have enough to worry about) is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Earlier today by Fannie: America Hates Honest Women. And by me: Yeah, We Know and Iowa Legislature Passes "Heartbeat" Abortion Bill and Trump Doesn't Want Us to Know How Many Civilians He Kills.

Here are some more things in the news today...

Let us begin with a real thing that the President of the United States tweeted this morning:


This is clearly a response to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein having said publicly yesterday, itself a response to Congressional Republicans drawing up articles of impeachment against him: "I can tell you there have been people who have been making threats privately and publicly against me for quite some time, and I think they should understand by now, the Department of Justice is not going to be extorted. We're going to do what's required by the rule of law. And any kind of threats that anybody makes are not going to affect the way we do our job."

Ben Jacobs at the Guardian explains:
The threat of impeachment is being used as leverage for Republican to get more information about the federal investigations into Russian interference in the 2016 election as well as Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server as secretary of state.

Earlier in April, the justice department handed over a redacted document about the origins of the Russia investigation to the House intelligence committee after its chair, Devin Nunes, publicly mused about holding law enforcement officials in contempt of Congress or even impeaching them for not cooperating.

Rosenstein said on Tuesday that "if we were to just open our doors to allow Congress to come and rummage through the files, that would be a serious infringement on the separation of powers."
So, to be clear, because the Deputy Attorney General of the United States (who is in charge of the Russia investigation as the Attorney General had to recuse himself since he is under suspicion of collusion) said that he would not allow partisan operatives in Congress to violate the separation of powers to assist the president in subverting the rule of law, now the president is publicly threatening to intervene with the Justice Department to stymie Rosenstein, in an extraordinary abuse of power and almost certainly illegal attempt to obstruct justice.

I don't even know what to say anymore. This is wanton authoritarian bullying, and Donald Trump was never going to behave any other way given the vast powers of the office of the U.S. presidency.

It was always reason #1 not to let him anywhere near the Oval Office.

* * *

Nancy LeTourneau at Washington Monthly: Ukraine Stopped Cooperating with the Mueller Investigation to Appease Trump.
In addition to dropping the investigation into Manafort's dealings in Ukraine, the government has decided that it will not cooperate with Mueller's investigation and most importantly, allowed Konstantin V. Kilimnik to go to Russia, where he will be unavailable for questioning. You might remember that Kilimnik was the go-between who facilitated the communication between Manafort and Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska after he got the position as Trump’s campaign manager.

The government of Ukraine is being pretty transparent about why they are doing all of this.
The intention in Kiev to freeze cooperation with American investigators was readily acknowledged by Volodymyr Ariev, a member of Parliament who is an ally of President Petro O. Poroshenko.

"In every possible way, we will avoid irritating the top American officials," Mr. Ariev said in an interview. "We shouldn't spoil relations with the administration."
In other words, they need the support of the Trump administration and know that they won't get that if they cooperate with an investigation that he constantly rails about and calls a "witch hunt." So we have an American president who is under investigation for conspiring with a foreign country to influence an election, while other countries fear that cooperating with that investigation will hurt their own interests.
Yes, all of that. Plus, the fact that Trump is a stooge of Vladimir Putin is extremely relevant, given Putin's aggressive disposition toward Ukraine.

In related news, Jill Stein is still a cavernous asshole.


Nicole Lafond at TPM: Trump Lawyers Lack Security Clearance Needed to Discuss Some Mueller Questions. "Donald Trump's team of lawyers all currently lack the security clearance necessary to discuss sensitive issues related to a potential presidential interview with special counsel Robert Mueller, Bloomberg News reported Wednesday. According to two people familiar with the situation who spoke with Bloomberg, Trump's former lawyer John Dowd — who resigned over disputes with the rest of the legal team about whether Trump should sit for an interview with Mueller — was the only lawyer on the team who had a security clearance." What a complete shitshow.

* * *

Here's one for anybody who still thinks Pence would be an improvement on Trump:


Hey, speaking of anti-choice shitbird Mike Pence... Amanda Michelle Gomez at ThinkProgress: Trump Policy Taking Aim at Planned Parenthood Threatens to Have Devastating Ripple Effects. "The Trump administration is expected to continue its assault on Planned Parenthood by reportedly going after the provider's federal family planning dollars — cutting the provider off to punish it for providing abortion services, even though Planned Parenthood doesn't use any federal funds for abortion. ...Federal officials are aiming to cut off Planned Parenthood from Title X family planning funding to fulfill a campaign promise to anti-abortion advocates, but the way the Trump administration would go about excluding Planned Parenthood would affect how all Title X clinics provide care to patients."

Cristiano Lima at Politico: Trump Touts Renewed 'Spirit' at State Department under Pompeo. "Donald Trump hailed newly-minted Secretary of State Mike Pompeo as a 'true American hero' while alluding to a boost of energy at the State Department during a ceremony marking the agency leader's swearing in on Wednesday. ...'I must say that's more spirit than I've heard from the State Department in a long time, many years,' the president said while speaking alongside Pompeo, Vice President Mike Pence, and other administration officials. 'We can say many years and maybe many decades. It's going to be a fantastic start a fantastic day. That spirit will only be magnified.'" BARF.

* * *

[Content Note: White supremacy; Nazism]


[CN: Violence; nativism] Sarah Macaraeg at the Guardian: Fatal Encounters: 97 Deaths Point to Pattern of Border Agent Violence Across America. "The shootings are only part of a larger litany of Customs and Border Protection agency-related violence inside the U.S. Encounters have proven deadly for at least 97 people — citizens and non-citizens — since 2003, a count drawn from settlement payment data, court records, use of force logs, incident reports, and news articles. From Maine to Washington state and California to Florida, the deaths stem from all manner of CBP activity. Border agents manning land crossings and a checkpoint have used deadly force, as have agents conducting roving patrols — up to 160 miles inland from the border. Pedestrians were run over by agents. Car chases culminated in crashes. Some have drowned, others died after they were pepper-sprayed, stunned with tasers, or beaten. But the majority of victims died from bullet wounds, including shots in the back."


[CN: Misogyny; toxic masculinity] And finally: This opinion piece, "The Redistribution of Sex," by Ross Douthat for the New York Times is absolutely vile — so reverberatingly obscene that I debated whether to give it any attention at all. In the end, I decided I would mention it, just to condemn it in the strongest possible terms, and provide a space for others who may want to do the same, or seek commiseration that it was even published in the first place.

All I will say is this: It is outrageous that Douthat conflates the idea of challenging kyriarchal beauty standards to broaden sexual desirability with the idea that women owe shitty men sex to keep them from being violent. It's also deeply mendacious, twisted in a very particular way to serve his larger point in defense of violent, entitled men.

We are in a very bad place indeed when the "paper of record" is willing to publish a piece that essentially argues: Feminists wanted a sexual revolution but now they don't want to put out, so they shouldn't be too surprised when incels kill them. Shiver.

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 427

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures (plus the occasional non-Republican who obliges us to resist their nonsense, too, like we don't have enough to worry about) is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Earlier today by Fannie: Cambridge Analytica Stirred the (Supposedly Non-Existent) Bigotries of White America. And by me: Another White Man Who Isn't Troubled Enough to Be Called a Terrorist and Trump Responds to Biden by Saying HE'D Beat HIM Up, Because This Is Our Politics Now.

Here are some more things in the news today...

[Content Note: Police brutality; racism; descriptions of violence. Covers entire section.]

In yesterday's thread, I wrote about the police execution of Stephon Clark, who shot at him at least 20 times because he was holding a cell phone they claimed they thought was a gun (an excuse that was always garbage but is exponentially intolerable given the current ubiquity of cell phones). Footage of the killing has now been released, and, as usual, the video reveals the official police account of the shooting to be a total lie.

Monique Judge at the Root: Stephon Clark Shooting Video Released by Police.
In the helicopter video, a deputy can be heard guiding the officers to Clark's location, behind his house on his block. The officers approach his location, see him around a corner, and begin firing within seconds. The helicopter video also shows the officers cowering behind a wall. Clark appears to be walking slowly through the yard, and not charging toward them as police said in their statement. Even as Clark lies on the ground after being shot, both officers continue firing their weapons. Each shot at Clark at least 10 times.

...The police officer body camera footage shows us what happened on the ground. As soon as the officers spot Clark from their hiding place around the wall, we hear one of them yell, 'Show me your hands! Gun! Gun! Gun!' and they both unload their weapons on him. They continue to yell for him to show his hands after he is down and no longer moving.

...Again, the video appears to refute what police said in their statement. At no point in either video can we see Clark charging at officers with anything in his hands."
I am so fucking angry. I am so fucking sad. I am so fucking tired of police killing unarmed people and then lying about the circumstances. This is intolerable.

My sincerest condolences to Stephon Clark's family, friends, colleagues, and community. I am so sorry.

* * *

[CN: Guns; toxic masculinity. Covers entire section.]

In Tuesday's thread, I covered a school shooting in Maryland, in which one female student and one male student were injured, and the shooter shot himself as school officer shot at him. At the time, I wrote: "It sounds a lot like the shooter shot at a specific girl and boy before turning the gun on himself."

And indeed, it turns out that the shooter, 17-year-old Austin Rollins "had been in a relationship that recently ended" with the girl, 16-year-old Jaelynn Willey. (It's unclear whether the boy who was injured was deliberately targeted because of some connection to Willey.)

A number of media outlets have reported this news under headlines calling Rollins "lovesick."

Example, care of ABC News: Police: Maryland School Shooter Apparently Was Lovesick Teen. That's the headline they plopped on the AP wire story, the lede of which reads: "Tuesday's school shooting in southern Maryland that left the shooter dead and two students wounded increasingly appears to be the action of a lovesick teenager."

Incorrect. It was the action of an entitled, violent misogynist.

Fuck any news outlet that is promulgating this horrendous narrative that the attempted murder of a girl who refuses to be owned by a boy is somehow "romantic."

* * *

Matt Shuham at TPM: Trump Defends Congratulating Putin: 'Getting Along...Is a Good Thing'. "In the wake of a report that he ignored his national security team's advice not to congratulate Russian president Vladimir Putin on Putin's recent re-election, [Donald] Trump defended the exchange [on Twitter] Wednesday: 'I called President Putin of Russia to congratulate him on his election victory (in past, Obama called him also). The Fake News Media is crazed because they wanted me to excoriate him. They are wrong! Getting along with Russia (and others) is a good thing, not a bad thing... They can help solve problems with North Korea, Syria, Ukraine, ISIS, Iran and even the coming Arms Race. Bush tried to get along, but didn't have the 'smarts.' Obama and Clinton tried, but didn't have the energy or chemistry (remember RESET). PEACE THROUGH STRENGTH!'" This fucking guy.

Karen DeYoung, John Hudson, and Josh Dawsey at the Washington Post: Trump's Remark to Putin That They Could Meet Soon Caught White House Advisers by Surprise. "Trump's senior advisers were thrown when he told Russian President Vladi­mir Putin on Tuesday that he expected to meet with him soon, as briefings before the call to Moscow included no mention of a possible meeting, and aides have not been instructed to prepare for one, senior administration officials said. Although Trump told reporters that 'probably we'll be seeing President Putin in the not-too-distant future,' several officials said there are no plans for the two even to be in the same country until November, when both are expected to attend a Group of 20 summit in Argentina." No official plans, anyway.


Ian Millhiser at ThinkProgress: Before Being Fired by Sessions, Andrew McCabe Reportedly Authorized a Criminal Probe into Sessions. "Former Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe, who was fired by Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III less than two days before he became eligible for a federal pension, reportedly oversaw a criminal probe into Sessions himself. ...Sessions claimed that he fired McCabe last week due to the former FBI official's lack of candor regarding his conduct during an probe into former Democratic president candidate Hillary Clinton — in announcing the firing, Sessions said that 'the F.B.I. expects every employee to adhere to the highest standards of honesty, integrity, and accountability.' Ironically, the FBI's criminal probe into Sessions involves allegations that the attorney general was not honest under oath."


Whooooooooops!

* * *

If anyone thought that Republicans only hate democracy outside the walls of Congress, what happened during the proceedings on the budget omnibus today should swiftly disabuse them of that notion:


"Hardball politics" is one way to describe it. Cheating by authoritarian democracy-killers is another. Potato potahto.

* * *


Benjamin Haas at the Guardian: China Vows to Take 'All Legal Measures' to Protect Interests as U.S. Trade War Looms. "As the Trump administration prepared on Thursday to slap trade sanctions on China, perhaps including restrictions on investment and tariffs on as much as $60bn worth of products, fears of a trade war heightened. A Chinese foreign ministry spokeswoman said her country would 'take all legal measures to protect our interest' if the U.S. took 'actions that will harm both China and itself.'" Everything is going great under the president who makes the best deals or whatever.

* * *

Frank Bajak and Lise Olsen at the AP: Hurricane Harvey's Toxic Impact Deeper Than Public Was Told. "A toxic onslaught from the nation's petrochemical hub was largely overshadowed by the record-shattering deluge of Hurricane Harvey as residents and first responders struggled to save lives and property. More than a half-year after floodwaters swamped America's fourth-largest city, the extent of this environmental assault is beginning to surface, while questions about the long-term consequences for human health remain unanswered. County, state, and federal records pieced together by The Associated Press and The Houston Chronicle reveal a far more widespread toxic impact than authorities publicly reported after the storm slammed into the Texas coast in late August and then stalled over the Houston area."

George Dvorsky at Gizmodo: The Great Pacific Garbage Patch Has Way More Trash Inside It Than We Thought. "For years, scientists have been tracking a large accumulation of floating trash, mostly bits of plastic, in the north Pacific ocean called the 'Great Pacific Garbage Patch,' or the 'trash vortex.' This region, according to the latest research, has more lost and discarded plastic inside it than previous surveys suggested — like, a lot more. And it's still growing. The GPGP is filled with 79,000 metric tonnes (87,000 tons) of plastic, which is between 10 to 16 times higher than previous estimates, according to new research published today in Scientific Reports. Disturbingly, plastic pollution inside the GPGP 'is increasing exponentially and at a faster rate than in surrounding waters,' the authors state in the paper."

Damian Carrington at the Guardian: Paul Ehrlich: 'Collapse of Civilisation Is a Near Certainty within Decades'. "'Population growth, along with over-consumption per capita, is driving civilisation over the edge: billions of people are now hungry or micronutrient malnourished, and climate disruption is killing people.' ...Ehrlich is also concerned about chemical pollution, which has already reached the most remote corners of the globe. 'The evidence we have is that toxics reduce the intelligence of children, and members of the first heavily influenced generation are now adults.'"

I mention that last piece for two reasons: 1. Because Ehrlich's concerns are notable, given that it was research "published by Ehrlich and colleagues in 2017 [that] concluded that this is driving a sixth mass extinction of biodiversity, upon which civilisation depends for clean air, water, and food." 2. Paul and Anne Ehrlich's previous work has been (mis)used by white supremacists to argue in favor of some seriously gross population control strategies (and were able to do so because of failures in their work, which he admits), and it seems possible that their new work could be (mis)used in the same way, if they haven't made necessary corrections, especially given the current resurgence of white supremacist nationalism and nativism.

* * *

Charles Pierce at Esquire: 15 Years. More Than 1 Million Dead. No One Held Responsible. "Except for Sinan Antoon's richly deserved jeremiad, the 15th anniversary of the worst foreign policy disaster in modern American history went sailing by largely unremarked, at least in this country. After all, over here, everyone was too busy keeping track of the latest news involving the vulgar talking yam the country had installed as president... But, overseas, particularly in that part of the world where ruined Iraq has been turned into little more than an occupied battlefield, the people living there marked the anniversary the same way they've marked every day since George W. Bush launched his war based on lies. They were trying to stay alive."


[CN: Video may autoplay at link] Related to the above item, via CBS News: "The 60 Minutes interview with Stormy Daniels, the adult-film star and director who says she had an affair with Donald Trump, will be broadcast on Sunday, March 25 at 7:00 p.m. ET/PT on CBS."

And finally, in case there was any lingering question that Facebook is anti-democratic in its mission:


Meanwhile... Andy Towle at Towleroad: Facebook Blocks Ad Targeting by Sexual Orientation. "As it wrestles with the controversy over Cambridge Analytica's improper harvesting of user data, news has emerged that Facebook has blocked ad targeting by sexual orientation, meaning that companies and organizations will no longer be able to target specific areas of the LGBTQ community. This has made it impossible for some organizations whose mission it is to reach at-risk individuals to reach those people." Goddammit.

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

A Terrible Reminder That White Supremacy and Patriarchy Are Inextricably Linked

[Content Note: White supremacy; domestic violence; descriptions of violence.]

White supremacist Matthew Heimbach, who came to national prominence by leading a hate group, shoving anti-racist protesters, and being quoted in a number of shameful Nazi-normalizing features in various news publications, has been arrested for domestic battery.

Marwa Eltagouri at the Washington Post reports:

Heimbach was charged with assaulting his wife and his wife's stepfather, Matt Parrott, who is also co-founder of Heimbach's Traditionalist Worker Party. The organization is described by the Southern Poverty Law Center as a new white nationalist group masking itself in "traditionalism."

About 1 a.m. Tuesday morning, Parrott, 36, called police from a Walmart in Paoli, Ind., according to a police report obtained by the SPLC. Parrott told police he had fled to the Walmart with his stepdaughter after a confrontation with Heimbach, who had allegedly been involved in an affair with Parrott's wife. The stepdaughter told police that the affair had lasted three months but had recently ended.

But that night, according to the police report, Parrott caught Heimbach with his wife. He confronted Heimbach and told him to get off his property, but Heimbach wouldn't leave. Parrott poked his chest, then Heimbach allegedly grabbed Parrott's hand and twisted it down. Heimbach got behind Parrott and "choked him out" with his arm, according to the police report.

Parrott told police he briefly lost consciousness. When he woke up, he again told Heimbach to get off his property, and Heimbach again tried to choke him, according to the police report. Parrott again lost consciousness, and upon waking up heard his wife tell Heimbach to track down his stepdaughter's phone because it had a recording of Heimbach and Parrott's wife together, according to the police report. Parrott and the stepdaughter escaped to the Walmart.

After police met Parrott at the Walmart, they left to track down Heimbach, and found him in a verbal confrontation with his own wife. Heimbach's wife told police that her husband grabbed her face and "threw me with the hand on my face onto the bed."

All four people involved in the incident stated their occupations were "White Nationalists" in the police report.
That Heimbach is a violent domestic abuser should come as no surprise. Despite their reprehensible, patriarchal rhetoric about "protecting" women, men who are grotesque racists don't treat women well, either. White supremacy and the patriarchy are inextricably tied together, and men who view exacting violence against people of color as their vocation don't come home from a long day of being vile shits to be loving husbands and fathers.

The human mind isn't built to compartmentalize eliminationist hatred so it can happily coexist with a healthy, functional, loving home life. White supremacists run profoundly abusive households.

And I want to highlight that Heimbach repeatedly choked his stepfather-in-law, because that is not an insignificant detail. To the contrary:


This is a dangerous man on a very dangerous path, who is increasingly violent at home. That is a major red flag.

I desperately hope that Heimbach encounters and engages with someone from a group like Life After Hate and abandons this heinous trajectory. It is the only intervention I can imagine having even a chance of altering his course of violence, which is chillingly being empowered and encouraged every day from the highest office in the nation.

Open Wide...

Today in Toxic Masculinity

[Content Note: Violent entitlement; animal cruelty; misogyny. Video may autoplay at second link.]


Those tweets were posted in 2014, and they were not the first time I've written about this subject, because I have been writing about this for a long time.

And here I am, writing about it again.

Thankfully, the women about whom I'm writing today — women who said no to men who wouldn't take no for an answer — are alive, unlike many other women who were killed by men who couldn't bear to let live any woman who rejected them. Unfortunately, in one case, two dogs are dead.

Amy Lavalley at the Post-Tribune: Owner of 2 Pugs Who Were Beaten to Death Rebuffed Advances of Man Accused in Their Killings. "The woman who owned two pugs that were beaten to death last month in Porter Township reportedly rebuffed the advances of the man charged in the dogs' deaths, according to court documents. Anthony Priestas, 23...was arrested Tuesday on two felony counts of animal cruelty for allegedly killing the dogs Feb. 21 after removing them from the Winfield home of Brandy Ortiz, court documents said. Ortiz, who has said she received the dogs, Marley and Mugsy, as a Christmas present from her parents seven years ago, told police investigating the allegations that 'she remembered a male subject who has been trying to date her but she has stayed off his advances,' court documents said."

The description at the link of how Priestas murdered the dogs is very difficult to read. (Frankly, I don't advise it.) He was clearly full of uncontrollable rage, all because he felt entitled to Ortiz, who he didn't believe had the agency and right to tell him no.

WCCO Minnesota: Man Urinated in Co-Worker's Water After She Denied His Advances. "A 47-year-old Minneapolis man is accused of urinating into a co-worker's water bottle numerous times after she rejected his romantic advances. Conrrado Cruz Perez faces one misdemeanor and one gross misdemeanor charge of adulterate by bodily fluid in connection to the October 2017 incident. According to the complaint, a female worker at the Perkins Family Restaurant in Vadnais Heights reported noticing water in her water bottle tasting like urine for the past several months. She said it began happening after she told Perez that she only wanted to be friends with him. Since then, she said there were about 15 instances of urine-tasting water in her water bottle at work."

Stephanie Saul at the New York Times: Harvard Professor Resigns Amid Allegations of Sexual Harassment. "A prominent government professor at Harvard who has been accused of sexual harassment and inappropriate behavior by as many as 18 women over several decades resigned on Tuesday following a decision by the university to place him on leave. The professor, Jorge I. Domínguez, 72, was the subject of a Feb. 27 article in The Chronicle of Higher Education that reported that at least 10 women had accused him of sexual harassment. ...The Chronicle article told the story of Terry L. Karl, an assistant government professor at Harvard during the early 1980s, who said Dr. Domínguez...had made repeated attempts to kiss her, attempted to run his hand up her dress and, at another point, made a reference to raping her. As she rebuffed his advances, Dr. Karl said, Dr. Domínguez reminded her of how powerful he was."

These are just three stories from the past week. Women tell men no. Men respond by killing their dogs; peeing in their water; threatening their careers.

That women often "agree" to do things with men because they are afraid what will happen if they say no is something about which I've had occasion to write twice, lately: Once regarding Aziz Ansari and once regarding Louis CK.

And that's because "Why didn't she leave?" — or say no, or scream, or kick him in the balls, or violently hurt him, or any one of a number of escalating variations — is a ubiquitous bit of apologia deployed in response to every story of a woman being harmed by a man and living to tell the tale.

This is why. This is always why.

Because there are men who will do terrible things, worse things than they are already doing to us, if we say no.

And there's no way to tell whether a man is that kind of man until he shows us.

Open Wide...

On the Parkland School Shooting

[Content Note: Guns; death; injury; domestic violence.]

Yesterday in Parkland, Florida, a 19-year-old named Nikolas Cruz went to Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, from which he had been expelled, and began shooting with a semiautomatic rifle. He killed 17 people and wounded 14 others, 5 of them seriously.

Cruz escaped the scene by disappearing into the crowd of fleeing students, but was later arrested and charged with 17 counts of premeditated murder.

At this point, the names of those killed and wounded have not been made public. My sympathies to the families, friends, classmates and/or colleagues, and community of those lost. I am so sorry. I hope those who are injured or traumatized or both have access to the resources they need to begin healing. ETA. Here are the victims of the Parkland shooting.

I am so profoundly sad and so profoundly angry.

Details about Cruz are still thin, but the picture that begins to emerge is one of a troubled kid who became a dangerous adult; whose mother, who recently died, was overwhelmed and had very little structural support, because we have collectively decided that supporting parents isn't an investment our culture should be making; whose apparent threat to become "a professional school shooter" was investigated by authorities to seemingly no consequence; and who, like virtually every other mass shooter before him, has a history of domestic violence: "Student Victoria Olvera, 17, said Cruz had been abusive to his ex-girlfriend and that his expulsion was over a fight with her new boyfriend."

There were lots of flags. Cruz had reportedly been "getting treatment at a mental health clinic for a while, but hadn't been there for more than a year."

Which underscores a point I've made repeatedly, in response to the ubiquitous urge to greet every mass shooting with the same tired talking points about mental illness: Not all mass shooters can be helped by psychiatric care, even if they have access to it. This is The Thing we don't want to talk about at all — that there are dangerous people who can't be "fixed" by all the mental healthcare in the world.

And if Cruz could have been helped, it clearly wasn't possible, for whatever constellation of reasons, to keep him in treatment.

The only practical and reasonable solution is reducing access to guns. And yet that is the one solution the governing party of this country refuses to try. They won't even brook discussion of it, despite the fact that yesterday's massacre was the 18th school shooting in the United States in the first 44 days of 2018, and despite the fact that three of the deadliest mass shootings in modern American history have occured in just the last five months.

Things are only getting worse, not better. And the best solutions that the Republican Party has to offer are: 1. More guns! 2. Continue to treat mass shootings like a force of nature for which we all must just do our best to prepare, like tornadoes or earthquakes.

Well, here's how that's working out: More guns is clearly resulting in more violence, and obliging schools to respond to school shootings by instituting safety drills may be saving lives, or:


That is not the fault of school administrators, who have no other choice but to prepare their students for mass shootings just like they prepare them for fires or natural disasters.

It's the fault of the governing party and the pro-gun organization to which they're beholden and their gun-loving base, who have unilaterally decided, because they are selfish and fearful and cruel, that it's fine to abandon all reason and decency, and to renege on our social contract to protect schoolchildren and their teachers.

Nearly 500 people have been killed in more than 200 school shootings since Sandy Hook. Anyone who is okay with that, anyone who continues to insist despite all evidence to the contrary that reducing access to guns isn't the answer, is abetting the next shooter. And the next. And every single one thereafter until they finally agree that protecting gun ownership isn't as important as protecting human lives.

Open Wide...

Quentin Tarantino Is an Abusive, Disgusting Person

[Content Note: Violence; abuse; rape apologia.]

You may recall that in January 10th's We Resist thread, I linked to a piece at Deadline by Mike Fleming Jr, in which he wrote that he was giving space to the actor Michael Douglas, who'd been accused of sexual harassment, to get ahead of the allegations because: "The accusation story will most likely follow elsewhere, but in this moment of 'she said, he said' trial by journalism, it was never specified whose version had to be first. So here, Douglas states his case."

Fleming is carving quite the niche for himself, as he's now given space to Quentin Tarantino to tell "his side" of the story told by Uma Thurman. Explains Fleming this time: "I offered Tarantino the opportunity to clarify because at this moment, stories get written and then picked up across the globe, often getting twisted to suit convenient narratives in this #MeToo moment."

That Fleming believes stories women tell about being harassed and/or assaulted by men are shaped into narratives that are "convenient" for anyone pretty much tells you everything you need to know about the dude's motives, as does the fact that he doesn't believe that it's a legitimately "convenient narrative" for Tarantino to argue, at distressing length, that the reason he needs to personally spit on and choke the women in his movies because otherwise it won't look authentic.

That's exactly what a "convenient narrative" to excuse assault under the auspices of auteurism looks like.

In sum: Quentin Tarantino gave an interview designed to discredit Uma Thurman, to a man with an apparent agenda to discredit all women who are speaking out against men in the film industry. And the interview was published under the headline: "Quentin Tarantino Explains Everything: Uma Thurman, the Kill Bill Crash, & Harvey Weinstein."

Uma Thurman told her story, but now Tarantino "explains everything," the implication being that Thurman's account cannot be trusted.

The thing is, a careful reading of Tarantino's account confirms that he is indeed the abusive manipulator he has been alleged to be.

Tarantino claims, for instance, that he didn't have to bully Thurman into the driving stunt which ultimately resulted in an injurious crash:

I start hearing from the production manager, Bennett Walsh, that Uma is trepidatious about doing the driving shot. None of us ever considered it a stunt. It was just driving. None of us looked at it as a stunt. Maybe we should have, but we didn't. I'm sure when it was brought up to me, that I rolled my eyes and was irritated. But I'm sure I wasn't in a rage and I wasn't livid. I didn't go barging into Uma's trailer, screaming at her to get into the car. I can imagine maybe rolling my eyes and thinking, we spent all this money taking this stick shift Karmann Ghia and changing the transmission, just for this shot.
He pointedly notes that he "wasn't in a rage" and "wasn't livid" and didn't scream at her. Which, of course, is not what Thurman alleged. What she said was: "Quentin came in my trailer and didn't like to hear no, like any director. He was furious because I'd cost them a lot of time. But I was scared. He said: 'I promise you the car is fine. It's a straight piece of road.'" Tarantino, in Thurman's telling, "persuaded her to do it."

Which is exactly what Tarantino admits, after he creates the strawman of his flying into a rage, only to knock that strawman down. In fact, he repeatedly states that he used charm, not anger, to coerce her into driving the car. As Thurman said, he persuaded her — and he did it by exploiting the fact that she trusted him.

He is so delighted with how he convinced her to do something she explicitly said she did not want to do, something that ultimately resulted in her being seriously injured, that he boasts about how he did it, over and over:
Anyone who knows Uma knows that going into her trailer, and screaming at her to do something is not the way to get her to do something. That's a bad tactic and I'd been shooting the movie with her for an entire year by this time. I would never react to her this way.

...Far from me being mad, livid and angry, I was all…smiley. I said, Oh, Uma, it's just fine. You can totally do this. It's just a straight line, that's all it is. You get in the car at [point] number one, and drive to number two and you're all good.

...I came in there all happy telling her she could totally do it, it was a straight line, you will have no problem. Uma's response was…"Okay." Because she believed me. Because she trusted me. I told her it would be okay. I told her the road was a straight line. I told her it would be safe. And it wasn't. I was wrong. I didn't force her into the car. She got into it because she trusted me. And she believed me.

So, it's decided she would get in the car.
He is literally just bragging about being such a savvy manipulator that he didn't even have to "force her."

This is not an apology. It the slavering confession of an abuser who delights in hurting women.

* * *

What we now know about Quentin Tarantino — in addition to the fact that he has made a career out of making films inordinately preoccupied with sexual violence and torture, in which he has himself played a rapist twice — is that he:

1. Has choked two actresses onscreen (Uma Thurman and Diane Kruger), and spit on one of them (Thurman) as well.

2. Convinced Thurman to get into a car against her will, in which she was ultimately hurt, and now says of the horrendous footage he finally gave her after 15 years: "See, all that is old news. I saw the footage when I found it. Seeing it in the article didn't do anything."

3. Is making a film about the Manson murders, in which Roman Polanski will play a central character.

4. Once defended Polanski's rape of a 13-year-old girl, on a 2003 episode of the Howard Stern Show.
Asked by Stern why Hollywood embraces "this mad man, this director who raped a 13-year-old," Tarantino replied:
"He didn't rape a 13-year-old. It was statutory rape...he had sex with a minor. That's not rape. To me, when you use the word rape, you're talking about violent, throwing them down—it's like one of the most violent crimes in the world. You can't throw the word rape around. It's like throwing the word 'racist' around. It doesn't apply to everything people use it for."
Reminded by Robin Quivers that Polanski's victim—who had been plied with quaaludes and alcohol before her assault—did not want to have sex with Polanski, Tarantino became riled up.
Tarantino: No, that was not the case AT ALL. She wanted to have it and dated the guy and—

Quivers: She was 13!

Tarantino: And by the way, we're talking about America's morals, not talking about the morals in Europe and everything.

Stern: Wait a minute. If you have sex with a 13-year-old girl and you're a grown man, you know that that's wrong.

Quivers: ...giving her booze and pills...

Tarantino: Look, she was down with this.
We have now a very clear picture of who Quentin Tarantino is. He is an abusive, disgusting person. A dangerous person.

And to anyone who would argue that we shouldn't cancel Tarantino just for the art he makes or the opinions he holds, because, after all, he hasn't hurt anyone, I would remind them that he sure as fuck has.

image of Uma Thuman in a blue Karman Ghia just after she has run into a tree; she lies limp in the driver's seat, with her arms loosely reaching upward
I felt this searing pain and thought, 'Oh my god, I'm never going to walk again.'

Open Wide...

Uma Thurman Speaks Out on Weinstein, Tarantino

[Content Note: Sexual harassment and assault; coercion; injury; strangulation.]

Three months ago, Uma Thurman, who worked closely with both Harvey Weinstein and Quentin Tarantino, was asked her thoughts on women in the film industry speaking out about sexual harassment and assault. She gave a cryptic but compelling answer, with a clenched jaw.

Female reporter, offscreen: In light of recent news, uh — Gwyneth has spoken out; Angelina has spoken out; you're such a powerful woman in film. What are your thoughts about speaking out about inappropriate behavior in the workplace?

Thurman: Umm. I think it's commendable. And, uhhh. [she pauses; looks as though she's choosing her words very carefully] I don't have a tidy soundbite for you. [glances directly into camera] Because, I have learned — I am not a child — and I have learned that, when I've spoken [clenches teeth] in anger, I usually regret the way I express myself. [takes breath] So I've been waiting to feel less angry. And when I'm ready, I'll say what I have to say. [nods firmly]

Reporter: Thank you so much.

Thurman: Thank you.
Uma Thurman is ready. And she said what she has to say to Maureen Dowd at the New York Times: "This Is Why Uma Thurman Is Angry." It is a lot to take in. There is a lot about Harvey Weinstein; there is even more about Quentin Tarantino, whose career is inextricably linked to Weinstein, and who evidently shares his contempt for women's agency and safety, though it manifests in different ways.

At least what we know of it. Which now includes a story of coercing Thurman to get behind the wheel of an unsafe car onset, which resulted in a crash in which she was injured, and video of which Tarantino refused to release to her for 15 years.


There is simply no way this man should be given exorbitant amounts of money and virtually unregulated power over women to continue to make films fetishizing sexual violence and torture.

Instead, he is being given precisely that to make his next film about the Manson murders, in which Roman Polanski will play a central character.

I couldn't make that up if I tried.

I take up space in solidarity with Uma Thurman. I am grateful for her voice, and for her anger.

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 375

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures (plus the occasional non-Republican who obliges us to resist their nonsense, too, like we don't have enough to worry about) is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Here are some things in the news today:

BREAKING:


[Content Note: Video may autoplay at link] Kathryn Watson at CBS News: Andrew McCabe Urged to Step Down as FBI Deputy Director. "FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe is retiring from the FBI, CBS News' Pat Milton has confirmed. According to Milton, a source familiar with the matter confirms that McCabe was urged to step down. He is currently on leave and will official retire in March. McCabe was under considerable scrutiny from Republicans, as special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russian election meddling and any ties to Trump associates continued. McCabe took temporary charge of the FBI after [Donald] Trump fired FBI Director James Comey earlier this year, and some skeptics viewed McCabe as too close to his former boss."

Fuck. And Trump's authoritarian march continues onward.

* * *

Earlier today by me: The Entire Republican Party Is Compromised and Trump Pals Fairly Certain He'll Lie Under Oath.

[CN: Guns; misogyny; death]


Is now the time to have a conversation about a culture of violent entitlement, toxic masculinity, and gun access, or nah? Still going to keep punting while people are killed at the hands of violent misogynist men? Cool.

* * *

[CN: War on agency]


Donald Trump wants to have a big win for his white conservative evangelical base right before the State of the Union address tomorrow night. A thank-you note, for standing with him despite news of his philandering with an adult film star and paying her off to keep silent. "Thanks for having no consistent principles at all except hating marginalized people! Here's some more hating women for you!"

Let us be abundantly clear about this legislation: It will not save any fetuses, but it will kill people who carry them.

* * *

Nico Hines at the Daily Beast: Trump Tower Russian Lawyer, Natalia Veselnitskaya, Exposed in Swiss Corruption Case.
The Moscow operation behind the now-infamous Russian-Trump Tower meeting in June 2016 included a direct attempt to enlist a foreign country's law-enforcement official as a virtual double-agent, according to a court case in Switzerland.

One of Switzerland's top investigators has been fired after allegations of bribery, violating secrecy laws, and 'unauthorized clandestine behavior' in meeting with the very same Russian actors linked to the Trump Tower encounter.

Details of the explosive case have been published by investigative reporters for the Tribune de Genève and Tages-Anzeiger newspapers in Switzerland. The officer, identified only as Victor K., traveled to Moscow—against the expressed wishes of his superiors—where he spoke to Natalia Veselnitskaya, the lawyer who met with Donald Trump Jr., Paul Manafort, and Jared Kushner at Trump Tower.

The meeting was reportedly set up by Russian Deputy Attorney General Saak Albertovich Karapetyan—from the same rogue department that was apparently responsible for offering intel on Hillary Clinton to be shared at the Trump Tower meeting and the Kremlin's further plots to influence U.S. politics.
In other news, care of the BBC: Kremlin Accuses U.S. of Meddling in Election. "An expected U.S. report that could sanction Kremlin-linked oligarchs is an attempt to influence Russia's March presidential election, Moscow has said. The US treasury report is expected to detail the closeness of senior Russian political figures and oligarchs to President Vladimir Putin, who is standing for re-election. ...Dmitry Peskov said the US report was a 'direct and obvious attempt to influence the elections' on 18 March." LOLOLOL okay.


This is a very handy resource from Allegra Kirkland at TPM: Here's the Obstruction Case Against Donald Trump. "From the earliest days of Trump's administration, the president and his closest allies have used a range of tactics to obfuscate damaging information and stymie Mueller's probe into whether the Trump campaign colluded with Russia during the 2016 election. And Mueller, in turn, appears to have gathered a plethora of evidence that lays out this pattern of behavior. ...Here's a full timeline, based on reliable reports that haven't been seriously challenged, of the 2017 events Mueller could draw on to establish an obstruction case against the President."

* * *

[CN: Nativism] David Nakamura at the Washington Post: Lawmakers Call on Trump to Drop Bid for Legal Immigration Cuts. "Trump's demands to slash legal immigration levels are likely to sink a deal. Democrats have voiced fierce opposition to a White House plan, released late last week, that featured a path to citizenship for 1.8 million dreamers in exchange for $25 billion for his border wall and sharp cuts to family immigration visas. Though Democratic leaders have grudgingly offered wall funding, they have accused the president of leveraging the dreamers as 'ransom' to severely constrict legal immigration, calling it a wish list for 'anti-immigration hard-liners' and 'white supremacists.'" Correct analysis by the Democrats.

[CN: Nativism; white supremacy] Tina Vasquez at Rewire: Lines Blurring Between Immigration Priorities of Trump Administration and Hate Groups. "[T]he entirety of Trump's blueprint for the country's immigration system appears to come from organizations the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) has designated as anti-immigrant hate groups, like the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) and the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS). Put another way, the current president is turning demands from anti-immigrant hate groups, groups that have ties to the eugenics movement and openly advocated for heavily restricting immigration levels in order to maintain a white majority, into U.S. immigration policy. ...A closer look at Trump's proposals — before and now during his presidency — reveal near-exact overlap with these hate groups."

Chaim Gartenberg at the Verge: FCC Chair Ajit Pai Is Opposed to a Government-Run 5G Network. "Over the weekend, Axios reported that officials within the Trump administration have been proposing the creation of a nationwide 5G network in order to protect against Chinese leadership in forthcoming networking technology. However, it seems that the unnamed senior national security officials who presented the proposal failed to talk to current FCC commissioner Ajit Pai first. Pai released a statement this morning that, in no uncertain terms, opposes the plan for a government-run 5G network. It's not a surprising stance for Pai... It's hard to imagine that someone who feels that major telecom companies need less government oversight would be in favor of suddenly allowing the government to run the entirety of America's 5G network."

Matt Novak at Gizmodo: Fitness App's 'Anonymized' Data Dump Accidentally Reveals Military Bases Around the World. "People around the world use the app Strava on their smartphones and Fitbits to track how far they run. But researchers have discovered that an 'anonymized' data dump released by Strava last year has accidentally revealed sensitive locations, including U.S. military bases around the world. The user data was released in November as a '2017 heatmap,' showing over 1 billion activities, including 13 trillion GPS datapoints. That includes where and how fast various people went for a jog, for instance. And if you look closely, something like airfields in Somalia that may house American special forces suddenly light up like a Christmas tree."

Alastair Gee at the Guardian: Amid Dangers from the Trump Administration and Climate Change, Sites Including the Grand Canyon and Zion National Park Are Facing Yet Another Threat: 'Massive Disrepair'. "The National Park Service is the protector of some of America's greatest environmental and cultural treasures. Yet a huge funding shortfall means that the strain of America's passion for its parks is showing. Trails are crumbling and buildings are rotting. In all there is an $11bn backlog of maintenance work that repair crews have been unable to perform, a number that has mostly increased every year in the past decade. 'Americans should be deeply concerned,' said John Garder, senior director of budget and appropriations at the National Parks Conservation Association (NPCA). The National Park Service, he argued, is hamstrung by a lack of resources and is in 'triage mode.'"

Caitlin MacNeal at TPM: Trump Claims Ice Caps 'Were Going to Melt' But Are 'Setting Records'. "Donald Trump suggested to Piers Morgan in an interview that aired in full on Sunday that the polar ice caps are actually doing well, despite concerns about climate change, though it's not clear how Trump came to that conclusion. Morgan asked Trump if he believes in climate change. 'Look, it used to not be climate change, it used to be global warming. That wasn't working too well because it was getting too cold all over the place,' Trump claimed in response. He then launched into a baseless claim about ice caps. 'The ice caps were going to melt, they were going to be gone by now, but now they're setting records,' Trump said."

I have no idea what the fuck he is even talking about. During the same interview, he also told Morgan that he isn't a feminist: "No, I wouldn't say I'm a feminist. I mean, I think that would be, maybe, going too far. I'm for women, I'm for men, I'm for everyone." Morgan literally pitched this as "breaking news."


More like "No Shit, Sherlock" news.

* * *

[CN: Misogyny; sexual harassment; sexual assault; rape apologia. Covers entire section.]

Michele Amabile Angermiller at Variety: Grammys So Male? 'Women Need to Step Up,' Says Recording Academy President. "The only woman presented a solo Grammy during the awards telecast on Sunday night? Alessia Cara, who took home best new artist. Recording Academy president Neil Portnow was asked by Variety about #GrammysSoMale and had this to say: 'It has to begin with… women who have the creativity in their hearts and souls, who want to be musicians, who want to be engineers, producers, and want to be part of the industry on the executive level… [They need] to step up because I think they would be welcome. I don't have personal experience of those kinds of brick walls that you face but I think it's upon us — us as an industry — to make the welcome mat very obvious, breeding opportunities for all people who want to be creative and paying it forward and creating that next generation of artists.'"

What the actual fuck. This "women need to step up" bullshit will not widely be identified as workplace harassment, but the fact that it's the president of an industry academy saying it means it absolutely is.

Rebekah Entralgo at ThinkProgress: 22 Senators Call on Labor Department to Assess Economic Impact of Workplace Sexual Harassment. "Twenty-two Democratic senators are calling on the Labor Department to collect additional, better data regarding sexual harassment in the workplace. ...'What is known is that harassment is not confined to industry or one group. It affects minimum-wage fast-food workers, middle-class workers at car manufacturing plants, and white-collar workers in finance and law, among many others,' the senators wrote in the letter, provided to Buzzfeed. 'No matter the place or source, harassment has a tangible and negative economic effect on individuals' lifetime income and retirement, and its pervasiveness damages the economy as a whole.' The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission reports that anywhere from 25 percent to 85 percent of women report having been sexual harassed in the workplace."

The signatories include Democratic Senators Kristen Gillibrand, Elizabeth Warren, Kamala Harris, and Cory Booker, and not a single Republican Senator. Not a one.


After Eggert made the allegations, which she has made previously, Baio, who is a major Trump booster, and his wife took to Facebook Live to dispute Eggert's account and call her a liar, because they are gross people.

Judd Legum at ThinkProgress: The GOP Finally Released a Statement on Steve Wynn — and It's Pathetic.
[On Friday], the Wall Street Journal reported that casino mogul Steve Wynn, the Finance Chairman of the Republican National Committee, had engaged in serial sexual harassment and assault. The report was based on dozens of interviews in which people described how Wynn engaged in a "decades-long pattern of sexual misconduct" including "pressuring employees to perform sex acts."

For 24 hours, the Republican Party said nothing. The silence was particularly remarkable in light of the GOP's reaction to reports in October that Harvey Weinstein sexually assaulted numerous women. The same day the first report was published, the Republican Party demanded the Democratic Party and all Democratic officials return money from Weinstein, who was a major donor to Democrats.

On Saturday afternoon, Republican National Committee chairwoman Ronna McDaniel released a statement. Here it is, in its entirety:
Today I accepted Steve Wynn's resignation as Republican National Committee finance chair.
The statement was released to press but does not appear on the GOP website or Twitter account. It was also not posted to Twitter by McDaniel.
I am running out of ways to say that the Republicans are hypocrites and scumbags.

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...