Showing posts with label Rape Jokes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rape Jokes. Show all posts

Louis CK's Return Shows He Has Learned Nothing — and Neither Have Lots of His Fans

[Content Note: Rape culture; sexual assault.]

I have been groomed by predators.

The first time, I was 15 years old, and he was only a year older, but he already knew what to do to convince me to trust him. He knew how to exploit my vulnerabilities, and how to appeal to both my needs and desires. He knew exactly how to flatter me, and how to get me alone. And he knew how to make what he did to me seem like maybe it was what I wanted, or supposed to want.

What stands out to me now about the days and months leading up to that moment is how he so carefully probed my boundaries. How he'd push me just a little too far and I'd back away, and he'd retreat — only to replace the sinister I'd felt with the sweetness I wanted. In the moments of sweetness, he was so sweet that it was easy to believe that I'd imagined the sinister altogether, and that there was something broken in me that I'd be suspicious of someone who was good.

This recollection will surely feel familiar to other people who have been groomed. The specific details of our experiences might be different, but what is always the same is the probing — the insidious search for the edge of boundaries and how they may be slowly eroded, or obliterated altogether in a single, brutal moment.

The memory of that toxic dynamic, which lives in my body and reappears as tiny hairs standing up on their ends, lifting away from my goosebumped skin, is all I could think of reading the account of two women who were in the audience at Louis CK's "surprise set," where he was warmly welcomed back to the stage by many audience members, following a brief break after being accused of, and confessing to, sexual assault.

CK's particular brand of assault (that we know of) was masturbating in front of women without their consent — and I am certainly not the first person to observe that showing up onstage unannounced at a comedy show, in the audience of which were people would be troubled by his sudden appearance, bears a striking and disturbing parallel to his acts of sexual abuse.

The women were at the Comedy Cellar that night to see another comedian on the lineup when C.K. appeared onstage after a brief introduction from the night's emcee. "It felt like he was being thrust upon the audience without telling them," one woman, who asked to remain anonymous, told Vulture.
And just like victims of predators like CK often feel as though it may not be safe to leave, audience members who were uncomfortable by CK's presence may have felt as though they couldn't get up and leave safely. Which would not be without precedent: Daniel Tosh once incited rape against a female audience member who challenged him during a show, for instance.

At CK's unannounced appearance, it was not just the possibility that he would single out anyone inclined to leave, but that members of the audience might turn on anyone who left, too.
"The audience was very loud when Louis C.K. walked in. They were clearly supportive and surprised when he showed up, but there were a number of women sitting in the front row," the woman said. From her seat to the left of the stage, she could see a pair of women sitting stone-faced. Her friend, who asked be identified with the initials S.B., noticed the same reaction: "There were at least four to five females that I could see, and three or four of them were not having it. They were just looking at him, deadpan, straight, not having it."

S.B. said the audience was mostly white, with lots of couples. Both women say the set was awkward, but the first woman was particularly upset by it. "It was an all-male set to begin with. Then, it's sort of exacerbated by [C.K.'s] presence," she said. "If someone had heckled him, I think they would've been heckled out. It felt like there were a lot of aggressive men in the audience and very quiet women. It's the kind of vibe that doesn't allow for a dissenting voice. You're just expected to be a good audience member. You're considered a bad sport if you speak out."
Had I been in the audience, I would have been afraid to leave — not because I couldn't withstand people shouting at me, or even CK shit-talking me from the stage (because I could have, not that anyone should be expected to), but because I would've been scared that someone would have filmed my leaving and posted it online, then called for the Reddit Detectives to assemble, identify, and doxx me.

So audience members who felt uncomfortable were obliged to stay and watch CK. (Again, which sounds a lot like the sexual assaults he committed.) And once he had them trapped, he told a joke about a rape whistle.
The women say C.K.'s set was similar to his usual material, and included a joke about the phrase "clean as a whistle," which built up to a joke about how rape whistles are not clean. "When he said 'rape whistle' people were laughing, and I was just sitting there like oh my fuck. This is so uncomfortable and so disgusting. Everyone around me was laughing. That was just depressing."
That is what a predator probing to see what he can get away with looks like. Will they tolerate my being here? Will they tolerate this rape joke? Will they...

Naturally, CK would deny that this was his intention. That's because he's a liar.

It's because all predators are liars: "Dishonesty comes with the territory. Vanishingly few accused rapists are inclined to be honest about their crimes, for what ought to be evident reasons, and, further, rapists know they can rely on a breathtaking scope of rape apologia to contextualize and excuse their behavior. It is accusers, survivors, who sound like the liars, the fantasists, as they stammer and fume in the face of an entire culture primed to disbelieve them. And even if they are credible, and taken seriously, adjudicators (official and amateur) shrug their shoulders and murmur phrases like 'he said, she said.' Impossible to know."

If you're getting the feeling that this entire event was the rape culture encapsulate, that's because it was.


Keep that in mind as you read the outpouring of minimizing apologia, the scornful harangues that CK deserves a second chance, the excoriating 'splaining that CK has rehabilitated himself.

If that were true, he would not have shown up unannounced at a comedy club to tell a rape joke.

We all know that.

We all know that Louis CK leveraged the rape culture — the disbelief of victims; the metric fucktons of ready-made rape apologia reflexively employed on behalf of any man alleged to have assaulted women; the mob rule used to keep survivors and critics in line — to facilitate his return to the stage.

We all know that none of this behavior reflects the thinking of a reformed predator. Even people who insist that CK "deserves" a comeback, a second chance; who insist that he should be able to pick up his career right where it left off before his astonishingly brief vacation, ignoring that his abuses were also workplace violations; who insist that he is sorry and unaccountably believe that everything will be fine now; even those people know, if they are being honest, that this was a fucked-up way to make that comeback he supposedly deserves.

There is no valid argument that it was okay. There is only ignoring the reasons why it wasn't, because your fave dude is more important than the safety of the women he harms.

Open Wide...

Trump Launches Racist, Sexist Attacks on Maxine Waters and Elizabeth Warren

[Content Note: Racism; sexism; rape joke.]

Last night, at another one of his Make America Clap for Me Again rallies in Great Falls, Montana, Donald Trump launched vile attacks against two of his most persistent critics: Rep. Maxine Waters and Senator Elizabeth Warren.

Not for the first time, Trump went after Waters by taking a dig at her intellect:

Transcript: I said it the other day, yes, she is a low IQ individual, Maxine Waters. I said it the other day. High — I mean, honestly, she's somewhere in the mid-60s, I believe.

[The crowd roars with laughter.]
And, also not for the first time, Trump went after Warren by taking a dig at her heritage, then amped it up by making a reference to sexual assault which mocks survivors:

Transcript: [to audience laughter throughout] So who's gonna cover — they're gonna cover Bernie? Hey! They're gonna cover, like, Sleepy Joe Biden? They're gonna cover Pocahontas?! Think of it. Think of it. She of the great tribal heritage. What tribe it is? "Uh, let me think about that one." Meantime, she's based her life on being a minority.

Pocahontas! They always want me to apologize for saying it. And I hereby — oh no, I want to apologize; I'll use tonight. Pocahontas, I apologize to you! I apologize. To you, I apologize. To the fake Pocahontas, I won't apologize.

No, it's causing her problems. You know, that name's good. Because now even the liberals are saying, "Take a test! Take a test!" You know, I'll tell ya — I shouldn't tell ya, 'cause I like not to give away secrets, but this one: Let's say I'm debating Pocahontas, right? I promise you I'll do this. I will take — you know those little kits they sell on television for two dollars? "Learn your heritage!" Guy says, "I was born in Scotland." It turns out he was born in Puerto Rico! That's okay. It's good. You know. Guy says, "I was born in Germany." Well, he wasn't born in Germany; he was born someplace else.

I'm gonna get one of those little kits, and in the middle of the debate, when she proclaims that she's of Indian heritage, because her mother said she has high cheekbones — that's her only evidence; that her mother said she has high cheekbones — we will take that little kit and say — But we have to do it gently. Because we're in the Me Too generation. So we have to be very gentle.

[mimes tossing a DNA kit at Warren] And we will very gently take that kit, and we will slowly toss it, hoping it doesn't hit her and injure her arm. Even though it only weighs probably...two ounces!

And we will say, "I will give you a million dollars, to your favorite charity, paid for by Trump, if you take the test and it shows you're an Indian." You know. [audience cheers] And let's see what she does, right? I have a feeling she will say no. But we'll hold that for the debates.

Do me a favor — keep it within this room? 'Cause I don't want to give away any secrets. And the press is very honorable; they won't — [points at press] Please don't tell her what I just said. [laughter]
I don't have anything to say in response to this vile man and his gross attacks beyond what I already said on Twitter: How about no one lectures me about civility ever the fuck again.

Open Wide...

Hard Choices

Shakers, I was faced with a dilemma: Do I write yet another post about how Bill Maher is a despicable piece of shit who loves making rape jokes, or do I post and transcribe an adorable video I just saw of a baby elephant chasing birds? DECISIONS DECISIONS!

J/k baby elephant wins hands down.


Video Description: On a grassy and rocky hillside, on which elephants are chilling alongside spiral-horned antelope and (what I think are) water buffalo, a baby elephant chases an adult antelope, who doesn't appear particularly interested in playing.

The man behind the camera, who we cannot see, laughs. The baby elephant then turns its attention to a group of large grey birds (grouse, I believe), and chases after them. The birds squawk and scatter. The man and an unseen woman laugh.

The baby elephant continues chasing the birds, who playfully dodge the calf, and then whoooooopsy! Baby falls on its face in a highly comedic fashion. The people laugh, with the same affection of a grown-up who sees a baby human take a tumble, as the baby gets up and runs directly to mama for comfort.

Open Wide...

Just to Be Clear

[Content Note: Rape culture.]

There has been an enormous amount of "defense" of Al Franken that looks an awful lot like abuse apologia (because it is), and I don't have the energy to debunk each fetid thread, but I do want to say this: Al Franken admitted he posed for the photo we've all seen of his hands hovering on or over Leeann Tweeden's breasts, and I am amazed (not really) at how many people are okay with that photo.

She alleged much more than just what was captured in the photo, but, even if it were only the photo, the thing to which Franken has confessed and for which he's apologized, I am not okay with that.

I don't care if she's wearing a flak jacket and if he's not touching her and if if if all the other things that are supposed to mitigate the photo, even the claim that she was "in on it," because even if all those things were true, that's still a photo of a man who thinks that pretending to molest a sleeping woman is hilarious.

Jokes about sexual assault ("rape jokes") are not just a matter of taste. Irrespective of whether one finds them amusing, or tolerable, or whatever, and regardless of the intent of the people who make them, rape jokes serve a very particular purpose: Communicating to abusers that sexual assault is okay, and validating their belief that everyone commits abuse.

They are not neutral. They empower abusers.

So even if, as many of Franken's fervent defenders argue, it was just a "stupid photo," that "stupid photo" is still a big goddamned problem.

I don't trust any man who believes that rape jokes are funny. I can't.

It's not because I'm a "humorless feminist." It's because I have a zero tolerance policy on upholding the rape culture.

Open Wide...

Senator Al Franken Accused of Sexual Assault

[Content Note: Sexual assault.]

Leeann Tweeden has shared her story of being sexually assaulted by Senator Al Franken on a USO tour in 2006. Her account includes a photograph of Franken groping (or nearly groping) her breasts while she was asleep on the trip home.

Tweeden describes being coerced into rehearsing a skit Franken had written during which they kiss. During that rehearsal: "We did the line leading up to the kiss and then he came at me, put his hand on the back of my head, mashed his lips against mine, and aggressively stuck his tongue in my mouth. I immediately pushed him away with both of my hands against his chest and told him if he ever did that to me again I wouldn't be so nice about it the next time."

Franken then harassed her "with petty insults, including drawing devil horns on at least one of the headshots I was autographing for the troops." And, on the flight on the way home, he posed with his hands positioned over/on her breasts for a photo taken by the official photographer. Tweeden wasn't even aware it had happened until she "was back in the US and looking through the CD of photos we were given by the photographer."

So, to be clear, Tweeden reports that not only did Franken sexually assault her; he then humiliated her.

Before I continue, I want to note that there is a lot of debate about whether Franken was actually touching Tweeden in the photo. I am not going to host that debate here: 1. Because it's a distraction; 2. Because it's garbage to insist there's no problem with that photo as long as he wasn't physically touching her; and 3. Because it's ridiculous to me that anyone would assume if he wasn't touching her in the photo that means he didn't touch her at all. We literally cannot know, because she can't tell us, as she was asleep.

Moving on.

In response to Tweeden's account, Franken issued a statement reading: "I certainly don't remember the rehearsal for the skit in the same way, but I send my sincerest apologies to Leeann. As to the photo, it was clearly intended to be funny but wasn't. I shouldn't have done it."

That statement is insufficient in a number of ways, but most of all because including an argument that sexual assault could ever be "funny" is fairly damning.

Presumably, there will be a more comprehensive response from Franken. [ETA. A longer statement has now been issued.]

At the moment, I just want to make two brief observations about how Franken fits into the larger moment of abuser exposures:

1. Al Franken in particular feels like a huge betrayal. I'm sure I'm not alone in feeling that. And he joins a long line of progressive men who spoke out on behalf of women who have betrayed us: Eliot Spitzer, Anthony Weiner, John Edwards... The more men do this, the more women will feel like we have nowhere to turn and no one to trust, especially as long as men continue to disproportionately hold positions of power.

2. I am seriously freaked out by the thought that there are a whole lot of men whose takeaway at the moment is that sexual assault is so ubiquitous and so without consequence, aside from possibly a few days of public shame, that there actually isn't any meaningful risk to sexually assaulting women.

Please note, as always, that rape apologia, including and especially victim-blaming, is a violation of the commenting policy. Comments containing such will be removed and their authors banned.

Open Wide...

Today in Sexual Abusers: George H.W. Bush, Scott Brown, Leon Wieseltier

[Content Note: Descriptions of sexual assault and harassment. Video autoplays at first link.]

Ron Dicker at the Huffington Post: George H.W. Bush Apologizes After Actress Says He Sexually Assaulted Her. I hate this headline, for several reasons, not least of which is that Bush didn't apologize for sexually assaulting someone, as one would reasonably infer; he sent out a spokesperson to say it was all just a misunderstood joke, and he's sorry if his joke fell flat. Touching someone without their consent isn't an "attempt at humor."

Former President George H.W. Bush said he was sorry after actress Heather Lind accused him of sexually assaulting her during a TV show promotion in 2014.

"President Bush would never — under any circumstance — intentionally cause anyone distress, and he most sincerely apologizes if his attempt at humor offended Ms. Lind," Jim McGrath, a Bush spokesman, told HuffPost Wednesday in a statement.

In a now-deleted Instagram post on Tuesday, Lind said she posed with Bush, who was in a wheelchair, for a photo-op during a private screening in Houston of her AMC television series Turn: Washington's Spies. "He sexually assaulted me," she wrote in the post, according to reports.

"He didn't shake my hand," Lind wrote. "He touched me from behind from his wheelchair with his wife Barbara Bush by his side. He told me a dirty joke. And then, all the while being photographed, touched me again. Barbara rolled her eyes as if to say 'not again.' His security guard told me I shouldn't have stood next to him for the photo."
Eleanor Ainge Roy at the Guardian: Scott Brown: U.S. ambassador to New Zealand Investigated Over Inappropriate Comments. Please note as you read this that his comments were not only misogynist, but also racist and classist. Also: I speak the same US English that Brown does, and what he said is offensive as hell here, too.
The US ambassador to New Zealand Scott Brown has admitted he has been investigated over allegations he made inappropriate comments on his inaugural trip to Samoa, of which he is also the US representative.

Brown told New Zealand media on Wednesday he wanted to address "innuendo and rumour" about his visit to Samoa in July to celebrate 50 years of the peace corps in the country.

Brown — speaking with his wife, Gail Huff, by his side — confirmed he was the subject of an official administration inquiry by the US state department, which sent investigators to Wellington to look into what took place on the trip.

Brown said the official complaints related to comments he had made at a party in the Samoan capital, Apia, where he told attendees they looked "beautiful" and could make hundreds of dollars working in the hospitality industry in the US. Brown and Huff said they had "no idea" the comments would be regarded as offensive.

"I was told by my people that you're not Scott Brown from New Hampshire any more, you're an ambassador, and you have to be culturally aware of different cultures and sensitivities," Brown said.

"We are in a different culture: even though we all speak English, sometimes when we say one thing it means the complete different thing."
Michael Calderone at Politico: Leon Wieseltier Acknowledges 'Misdeeds' with Female Colleagues. A joke, a misunderstanding, misdeeds. What none of these men will ever say is I am sorry for abusing women.
[Former New Republic literary editor Leon Wieseltier] acknowledged that he engaged in behavior with female colleagues that left them feeling "demeaned," and offered an apology.

"For my offenses against some of my colleagues in the past I offer a shaken apology and ask for their forgiveness," Wieseltier said in a statement. "The women with whom I worked are smart and good people. I am ashamed to know that I made any of them feel demeaned and disrespected. I assure them that I will not waste this reckoning."

...Wieseltier was also accused of "workplace harassment" on an anonymous list circulating called "Shitty Media Men" that's having reverberations in the industry.
I hope the "good men" are starting to get a clear picture of just how ubiquitous sexual abuse really is. I hope the "good men" are beginning to understand that the not-good men create a minefield of sexual abuse through which women have to walk every step of our lives. I hope the "good men" are thinking about what they can do to change this culture, because doing nothing isn't fucking good enough.

Open Wide...

I Write Letters

[Content Note: Rape culture.]

Dear James Corden:

I see that you are "truly sorry" for telling a bunch of Harvey Weinstein rape jokes at the amfAR Gala, and that offending people "was never [your] intention."

Oh.

As someone who was not offended but contemptuous when I read your rape jokes, I'm ostensibly one of the people to whom you're apologizing.

And I don't accept.

I don't accept because it is not a meaningful apology, but the same regurgitated insufficiency that countless comics have made before you: It wasn't your intent; you were trying to shame rapists not victims; you think sexual violence is terrible of course; you are so, so sorry if anyone was offended.

And I don't accept it because it isn't the apology I want. I neither want nor need you to apologize to me for the feelings I have about your garbage jokes. What I want is for you to apologize for coasting through life not giving a fuck about survivors of sexual violence.

I know you don't want to apologize for that, because it's much uglier than just telling a few inappropriate jokes — and probably because you don't believe it's even true.

But let me assure you that it is.

Even if you care about women you know personally who have survived sexual violence, and even if you care in some abstract way about the absolute plague of sexual harassment and assault against women, you don't care and haven't cared enough to internalize that it's fucking disgusting to make casual rape jokes about a sexual predator, no less in the middle of women coming forward — even before all his victims who want to be known have made themselves known.

And honestly, James, if we're being honest, even you have to admit that's a very, very low bar. The "don't make rape jokes" bar.

And what makes me angry that you can't even manage to pass that bar is that I don't have the luxury of not understanding that the jokes you told aren't funny. I haven't managed to slide through life not understanding that people are hurt and triggered and angered and made deeply sad (all very different things than "offended") by rape jokes.

I have a category for "rape jokes" in which this is the 95th entry. Can you imagine that, James? Can you imagine how very different our lives are that you "didn't know" how troubling your jokes would be to many survivors (and our allies), while this is the 95th time I have published an entry about how rape jokes are not merely upsetting but function to uphold the rape culture?

Can you imagine for a moment what it feels like to be a woman who has survived being sexually assaulted multiple times, including being violently raped by someone I trusted; who publicly disclosed that history only to have it horrifically used against her; who has dedicated 1/3 of her life to advocacating for the dismantling of the rape culture, at a steep personal cost; who carries with her the story of every survivor about whom she's written; who does this work, became an activist, to try to give meaning to a thing that happened to me which I cannot bear to be meaningless; who knows that my experience is hardly unique, which makes it somehow even more painful?

Can you imagine this life of mine and then have to hear men over and over tell flippant jokes and say cruel things and then apologize for offending me while simultaneously lecturing me that it wasn't their intent and assuring me they totally care that sexual violence is a serious problem?

Not serious enough that you didn't know that rape jokes are shit, though. Right?

Fuck your apology, James Corden. I don't accept it. You're not even apologizing for the right thing. If you want to give me a meaningful apology, then it needs to be this: I'm sorry I didn't know. That I never listened. That I never heard. That I traded on the luxury afforded to me by my privilege. That I never stopped to contemplate what life is like for the women about whose sexual assaults I was joking, not even as I composed jokes about them.

I am all outta fucks for anyone who remains blissfully ignorant while virtually every woman on the entire planet — and an enormous number of men and genderqueer folks — have been sexually abused.

Apologize for the absolutely breathtaking indecency of that ignorance, or just shut the fuck up.

Sincerely,
Liss

Open Wide...

The Golden Globes

[Content Note: Transphobia; rape.]

Last night was the Golden Globes, and I didn't watch, because Ricky Gervais was hosting and I don't like rape jokes. Nor transphobic jokes, which I hear there were a lot of, too. What a super fun person he is.

This was the sum total of my Golden Globes tweeting:

image of a tweet authored by me reading: 'Flipped to Golden Globes for one second; saw Paul Feig fake-laughing at something; figured it won't get any better than that; turned it off.'

image of a tweet authored by me reading: 'So Ricky Gervais just introduced Mel Gibson with a Bill Cosby rape joke? Yeah, that sounds about right. ' and accompanied by the image of a dumpster fire

Anyway. The complete list of winners is here. Please feel free to discuss the winners, the losers, the broadcast, how terrible Ricky Gervais is, or whatever.

Open Wide...

It Continues to Be a Real Mystery Why Republicans Aren't Connecting with a Majority of Female Voters

[Content Note: Rape culture.]

More terrific commentary on rape from another Republican legislator:

Using the profile name "Stick," [Republican Texas state Representative Jonathan Stickland] responded to a question about sex with his wife in a comment posted to a fantasy football discussion forum in 2008.

"Rape is non existent in marriage, take what you want my friend!" the lawmaker reportedly wrote to another forum user who complained that his wife would not perform the "reverse cowboy" position during sex.

Stickland suggested in another comment that he wanted to cheat on a drug test. ...The user called "Stick" later revealed that he had purchased a "detox drink" and was trying to hide it from his wife.
He seems neat! Since these comments were made public, Strickland, who obviously describes himself in his Twitter bio as a "Christian conservative liberty loving Republican" because what the fuck else would it say, has posted only "a single message on his normally busy Twitter timeline."

screen cap of tweet authored by Strickland reading: 'LIBERTY!!!! #txlege'

Sure.

Open Wide...

Get This Guy

[Content Note: Rape culture; rape jokes; privilege.]

So, there's this British comedian named Daniel O'Reilly, who's better known by his stage persona called Dapper Laughs, who was criticized for making rape jokes during one of his sets, including saying one of his female audience members was "gagging for a rape."

(He claims he was just repeating what someone in the audience said. But whatever. You're the one with the microphone, dude. Anyway.)

O'Reilly has now (sort of) apologized for it, whilst still defending himself, but here's the part that's just priceless:

Not once was I invited to learn more about sexual violence, rape, and sexism and the problem with the attitude of men.

Instead of attacking me, why not educate me? I would happily accept it and then help and educate the millions of men who watch my stuff.
LOLOLOLOL FUCK YOU.

There is so much wrong with those three measly sentences, I hardly know where to begin. But three quick points:

1. People pushing back on rape jokes are offering "an education." The ubiquitous framing of anger about content that upholds the rape culture as "an attack" doesn't actually make it "an attack." And, even if it were, "an attack" and "education" are not mutually exclusive. Lots of negative experiences in life can also be learning moments. Often what makes something an education is how much we're willing to learn.

2. "Not once," he says, was he "invited to learn" about sexual violence or sexism. Bullshit. I call absolute bullshit on this assertion that he has never once encountered a cultural "invitation" (via public awareness campaigns, investigative articles, news programs, etc.) to learn about sexual violence or sexism, nor has he never once been asked, or "invited," to learn some shit by a woman in his life. Bullshit.

3. The very fact that he imagines he needs an invitation is indicative of male privilege as thick as shit. Women don't have the luxury of waiting for an invitation to "learn more about sexual violence, rape, and sexism and the problem with the attitude of men." No one invited him? Jesus fucking Jones, this guy. Dude, your humanity is an invitation to the party where everyone gets to learn about how women are treated like fucking garbage by lots of men. Don't blame the rest of us because you failed to RSVP.

Open Wide...

Today in Rape Culture

[Content Note: Sexual violence; rape jokes; misogyny; Game of Thrones spoilers.]

This past weekend, there were two major incidents of rape in entertainment: Louis CK hosted the season finale of Saturday Night Live, and spent a large portion of the intro doing a "comedy" bit about child rape; and Game of Thrones featured a rape scene of a central female character, which served as a plot point for a male character.

On their face, the two incidents may seem to have very little to do with one another—or may appear to be simply another two typical instances of the pervasive rape culture that turns sexual violence into fodder for eager audiences. But what these two incidents particularly share in common is that they were both content created by straight white men who have previously been criticized for rape-related content, who have now clearly drawn lines about where they stand on sensitivity to survivors—and there is, as always, an aggressive phalanx of fans who have mobilized in their defense.

Louis C.K. on SNL

Louis C.K., like many stand-up comedians who host SNL, used the host's opening to do some straightforward comedy, rather than indulge in the song-and-dance numbers or staged audience question segments favored by other hosts. He started with a bit about how he's a "mild racist," then moved on to a piece about parenting (during which he compared his two daughters to Israel and Palestine and referred to them as "bitches"), then closed on an extended riff about child molestation.

Among the "jokes" featured in this bit was victim-blaming, in the form of suggesting that smart children avoid being raped simply by avoiding sexual predators' homes, as well as the old "rape is a compliment" narrative, in the form of saying that he's a little offended he was never assaulted by a known predator in his neighborhood when he was a kid.

The segment culminated with his commenting about the tenacity of child predators and observing that child rape "must be amazing to risk so much."

If someone said to me, you eat another Mounds Bar and go to jail everyone will hate you...I'd stop doing it. ...There's no worse life available to a human than being a caught child molester ...You could only really surmise that it must be really good...for them to risk so much.
Predictably, people with a modicum of sensitivity and a functional sense of decency criticized Louis C.K.'s onslaught of rape jokes. (And some of his fans expressed surprise that he would "go so far," despite the fact that he has repeatedly defended rape jokes.) And, like clockwork, Louis C.K.'s fans defended the routine as "humor" and "free speech" and hurled tired accusations of oversensitivity and humorlessness at anyone who found it insensitive, inappropriate, and/or a normalization of rape and a perpetuation of the rape culture. Insert Boilerplate 101: The Edgy Comic Response here.

I don't know if there's anything I can say that I haven't already said literally hundreds of times before about rape jokes and rape culture that could convince Louis C.K.'s defenders to reconsider their reprehensible position. But I will observe this: As has been discussed in this space previously, it is an open secret that Louis C.K. sexually assaults female colleagues. His defenders are not merely defending a comedian telling jokes; they are defending an accused sexual predator who tells jokes about sexual predation.

When the allegations about Bill Cosby finally gained traction, after years of being diligently ignored by the public, and dozens of women came forward to share their stories of being assaulted by Cosby, people gasped and wondered how it could happen—but he had joked about drugging and raping women right in his comedy act.

When Dylan Farrow finally told her story, in her own words, about Woody Allen assaulting her, people gasped and wondered how it could be true—but narratives of predation on girls runs through his work.

When charges were brought against Jian Ghomeshi, first by one woman and then more, people gasped and wondered how could he have gotten away with it for so long—but it was known; it was known and people who didn't want it to be true simply ignored it. They defended him.

There are always fans to defend these men, even when they tell us right in their work that they are predators. It's art; it's comedy; it's unfounded rumor.

And the women, we women, we survivors, we Cassandras who dedicate our lives to deconstructing the rape culture and understanding rapists, sound the alarm over and over, and are drowned out by a cacophonous chorus of defenders who marginalize us as crackpots and hysterics.

This is not defending art, or comedy, or free speech. It's aiding and abetting a predator.

The Rape Scene on Game of Thrones

Last night's episode of Game of Thrones ended with Sansa Stark being married to Ramsay Bolton, who established her virginity before raping her and commanding his torture victim Reek (nee Theon Greyjoy) to watch. The scene was filmed so that the rape happens out of view; instead, the camera focuses in on Reek's quivering face, as he watches a young woman, with whom he was raised as a virtual sibling, being raped by a man who has intensely tortured and sexually mutilated him.

Because of the way it's filmed, the entire rape is framed as just another terrible thing Ramsay is doing to Reek. It is his reaction we see. There is no close-up of Sansa's face. We only hear her being raped. (The captions on the scene merely read: "Sansa cries.")

We have already seen Ramsay harm women: We have seen him rape, hunt, and kill women, and we have seen him mercilessly torture Reek. There was no need to establish that he is monstrously cruel. If the entire point of the scene was to prompt Reek to reclaim his identity as Theon, the mere threat of Sansa being raped could have sufficed. The rape scene was, in every conceivable way, gratuitous. Just a vicious sacrifice of a female character without even centering her in the experience.

I am not reflexively averse to sexual violence in movies and TV shows, but, as I have said many times before, rape must be more than a plot point for character development of male characters.

(At The MarySue, Jill Pantozzi explains how "Using rape as the impetus for character motivations is one of the most problematic tropes in fiction," and why this scene was so unfathomably gross from a plotting standpoint.)

In the books on which the show is based, there is another character who is Ramsay's wife, and the showrunners for the television series collapsed that character and her story with Sansa's, to streamline the series. Many people have described the scene in the book as "even worse," because Ramsay forces Reek to participate in the rape, thus sexually victimizing him in the process. But, in that version, Reek draws the line with his torturer and captor at being forced to hurt another human in the way Ramsay does. In that version, he is a simultaneous victim, reacting to his own victimization. Here, he is a "savior" (at best, and only after the fact), and snaps out of his thrall only when he is forced to witness Ramsay raping a female character who "matters."

I am certainly not arguing that I wanted to see another character raped—but the fact that Reek is not raped in the show, despite being raped in the books, fundamentally changes the scene and, quite literally, means that Sansa was raped just so his character could experience growth. And that the writers wanted to make the scene about him without his actually being raped via forced participation is really telling.

Further, Ramsay not only violates Sansa's consent, but, now, care of the show's shitty nightmare writers, has now stolen her agency—because everything that Sansa does now will be seen as being motivated by that rape. Her entire character arc from here forward will be a direct line back to that moment: If she's strong, it's because she's a survivor. If she's weak, it's because she's a victim. If she's powerful, it's because rape magically turns women into superheroes. If she's evil, it's because rape magically turns women into monsters.

One man, a rapist, has now been given the entire responsibility for her character growth.

And what did one of the writers responsible for this fucking mess have to say about it? That the responsibility lies with Sansa:
"This is Game of Thrones," he said soberly. "This isn't a timid little girl walking into a wedding night with Joffrey. This is a hardened woman making a choice and she sees this as the way to get back her homeland. Sansa has a wedding night in the sense she never thought she would with one of the monsters of the show. It's pretty intense and awful and the character will have to deal with it."
This is a hardened woman making a choice. It is deeply problematic, to put it politely, to be using the language of "choice" in an explanation for how a female character came to be raped for the character development of a male character.

Meanwhile, the writer of the books, George R.R. Martin, merely observes that it's okay when the show deviates from the books. Super.

* * *

My position on rape in entertainment has long been clear. I am angry that I have been obliged to write about rape jokes and rape being used as a plot device once again, but I am writing about it because I want to validate the feelings of those who are also angry and provide a space in which there will be a zero tolerance policy on defense of this despicable shit.

Those of us who react to this with anger, horror, contempt, righteous indignation are not oversensitive. The people who create this sort of content, and the people who defend it, are not sensitive enough.

Open Wide...

On Louie. Again.

[Content Note: Description of depicted sexual assault. Misogyny.]

Yesterday afternoon, Kristin Rawls let me know that, in the latest episode of Louie, the titular character, played by the show's creator Louis CK, attempts to rape someone. I read a couple of articles about the episode, and then I watched the episode (and some lead-up episodes) last night.

A couple things to note, by way of background:

The name of the episode is "Pamela 1," which refers to the character Pamela, played by Pamela Adlon who plays Louie's longtime friend (and also played his wife in his short-lived HBO series Lucky Louie).

The innocuous description provided in the OnDemand cable listing is, simply: "Louie on the rebound."

The episode aired on FX with its usual warning (ahem) for mature language. There was no warning for sexual assault or violence.

Louie is fresh off a relationship with Amia, a woman with whom he shared no common language, thereby circumventing the inconvenience of having to acknowledge her actual personality instead of the fantasy he imposes on her. Hence his being "on the rebound."

Several episodes earlier, Pamela had returned to town and asked Louie if he wanted to try a romantic relationship, but he turned her down because he was pursuing a relationship with Amia, even though she had told him she was going to be leaving soon.

The coverage I've read about the episode has mostly been written by people who seem to like the show and are flummoxed by Louis CK showing an attempted rape, which is played for laughs. As a result, the seriousness of the episode has been largely played down. I'm going to give it as fair and comprehensive description as I can.

When the episode opens, Louie strolls through Amia's now-empty apartment sadly. Later, he gets a text from Pamela, and invites her to meet him in a diner, where he tells her he's ready to give a relationship a try.

Pamela: "Oh, so the thing with that lady, it didn't work out, and now you've come sniffing around me? Is that the basic outline of this thing here?"

Louie: [after a long pause] "Yeah, that's basically it."

Pamela: "Well, sorry. Ticket's no longer available. That ship has sailed. The option is closed."

Louie: "But you said that I got under your skin and that you thinking about us—"

Pamela: "Yeah, that was before, and you didn't bite. The cookie is gone."

Louie: "Jesus. Why are you so mean to me?"

Louie gets a call from his babysitter, who has canceled. He's got two shows that night. Pamela offers to watch his kids while he goes to work. He is very appreciative.

Later, we see Louie doing stand-up, which is described in other articles about this episode as a sort of "pro-woman" set. I'll come back to that.

When Louie gets home, Pamela is asleep on his couch, and he stands over her, looking at her. She sleepily mumbles that she is awake and asks him not to jerk off on her.

Pamela gets up to leave, and Louie stops her from walking out. He grabs her arm and holds her. "Okay, bye-bye now," she says. "BYE BYE." She tells him goodbye with increasing urgency, as he holds her by both arms and turns her around to face him. "I'm really late for not being in here right now," she tells him, trying to wriggle away.

He holds her and tells her to listen, then leans over her and tries to kiss her. "No no no no no," she says, leaning away from him, as he continues to grip her forearms.

"Come on," he says, dragging her across the room. She frees one arm and grabs the corner of a table; Louie drags her, and the table along with her, until she loses her grip. "Just come on," he says, trying to push her through a doorway toward his bedroom. She puts her arms across the open doorway and wedges herself inside. "I don't like that!" she says.

They continue to wrestle, and he tries to lift her t-shirt. "Oh my god," she exclaims. She puts her hand over his mouth as he tries again to kiss her. "This would be rape if you weren't so stupid," she tells him, shoving him away. "God, you can't even rape well."

With a heaving shove, she pushes him to one side and grabs her coat and makes for the front door. He races after her and corners her, literally holding her in the corner at the front door by putting his arms on either side of her. "Hey, listen to me! Listen! Look at me!" he tells her. "Please!"

She turns around toward him, her eyes closed, then reluctantly looks at him. He towers over her, pointing his finger at her. "You said you wanted to do something with me," he says, "and I don't believe you that the ship has sailed."

She looks at him without responding, and he tells her he sees in her face that she wants to do something with him but can't. She doesn't reply, which he takes as a confirmation (and we are certainly meant to take as a confirmation, too, that he knows better than she does what she really wants). He informs her that because she can't take charge, he's going to.

"I'm going to take control, and I'm gonna make something happen," he tells her. She just looks at him. She looks frightened. We're meant to interpret that as her being frightened of her feelings for Louie, and not frightened that he is trying to rape her.

"You said you wanted to be in a thing!" he says. She says, "Does kissing have to be a part of that, though?" and he tells her it does and informs her he's going to kiss her. "Eww," she says, and turns her head away. "I'm gonna do it," he says. "Hurry up," she tells him. Louie kisses her while she closes her mouth tightly and grimaces.

"Okay," she says, turning away from him into the wall. "Thank you for the that. Okay, bye now." She leaves and closes the door behind her.

Louie clenches his fists and says, "Yes!"

There are a lot of rape culture narratives at work in this scene—the idea that because Pamela wanted something sexual with Louie at one point that she doesn't have the right to rescind that offer; the idea that Louie knows what Pamela wants just by looking at her; the idea that rape isn't really rape if it's a Good Guy just being too aggressive because he's awkward and doesn't know any better; the idea that reluctant women really just need men to take control; the idea that bumbling men can nearly rape someone by accident without realizing what they're doing.

In reactions to the episode I've seen, people are trying to make sense of the attempted rape scene in light of the "pro-woman" stand-up that precedes it. But I think it might be more useful to try to make sense of the actual message of the stand-up in light of the scene of sexual assault.

That is, look at the stand-up material without affording Louis CK the benefit of the doubt that he's definitely a Good Guy about women—something no one should be inclined to do, if they've really listened to him instead of hearing what they want to hear, because they don't want to not like him.

In one part of the set, Louie shares his theory that women once ruled the world:

I think that, uh, I think that we made god a man because we wanted men to be in charge, so it made sense. 'Cause it doesn't make sense that men are in charge. It makes sense that women would be in charge.

Because your mom is the first person who takes care of you, so how— It just makes sense that mothers would run the world. And, uh, it's the opposite—so we have this weird system of, uh, you know, men being— It's kinda upside down.

And I think the reason is 'cause women were in charge, a long time ago, and they were really mean. They were horrible, and they would—you had to walk around naked and they'd flick your penis and laugh at ya. So we're so scared of them! And then finally one guy punched a woman and she was like, "Wahhhh!" and he was like, "We can hit them!" and then that was it! That was it.
The set is not actually as feminist as people seem to think it is—or want it to be.

Women once ruled—but were mean to men so men punished them with violence.

Let us now recall the scene in the diner, in which Louie asks Pamela, "Why are you so mean to me?" Louie is frustrated that she won't acquiesce to his request to start a "boy-girl thing" with him, and he justifies his use of force by saying he's taking control because it's "obvious" she wants more.

But is that it? Is that all? Or are we looking at a man using violence against a woman because she is in control and being mean?

I am continually amazed by people's willing refusal to hear what Louis CK is telling them.

[Previously: Louie & Fat Girls.]

Open Wide...

Today in Rape Culture

[Content Note: Sexual violence; rape jokes.]

My failure to appreciate the HBO series Girls—a feminist show produced by Judd Apatow—is well-documented. And that piece was written before the primary male protagonist (Adam) raped his then-girlfriend in a horrendously gross scene, only for her character to later be represented as a hysterical harpy when confronting him in public about it.

In Sunday night's episode, Adam, who is now dating the primary female protagonist (played by show creator Lena Dunham) Hannah, was disturbed by Hannah's absurd role-playing scenario which cast him as a violent rapist. Not because he has regrets (or even seemingly any self-awareness) about being a rapist, but because he was sanctimoniously shaming her for not understanding he wants to have "normal" sex with her because he loves her. Because Adam, a rapist, is constantly written to be a moral arbiter and life coach for his girlfriend, as well as all her female friends.

The show is just reprehensible on the issue of sexual violence, and, well, maybe it's because its creator is, ahh, insensitive on the subject herself.

Dunham was the host of Saturday Night Live last weekend, the day before this last episode aired, and in a sketch sending up Girls, on which Dunham is naked a lot, she was also naked in the sketch. This prompted some asshole to shame-tweet at her, "you don't always have to get naked!" to which Dunham replied, "Please tell that to my uncle, mister. He's been making me!"

After criticism for her rape joke, Dunham removed it, and then tweeted: "I just made and deleted a not so great molestation joke. Sorry guys. I am really sleepy." Followed by: "SNL has a way bigger audience than our usual cozy girls audience, so I was seeing a rash of very different kinds of twitter rage."

Because, as usual, asking someone to be sensitive to not minimizing rape with shitty jokes is "rage."

When called out on waving away a rape joke with a claim of sleepiness ("I really don't think you'd be cutting anyone else any slack if they made that joke and then blamed it on being 'really sleepy'"), Dunham then replied: "Not if they were a fifty year old man. But by my lights women can have a lot of joke flexibility. Ya gotta get by in this world."

Welp.

Needless to say, I disagree.

But I do find it interesting that Dunham imagines a joke about being sexually abused by a family member is somehow more justifiable when it's told by a young woman than when it's told by an older man.

The only context that matters here is the rape culture, not the attributes of the person abetting it.

That particular argument, however, provides a good insight into Dunham's view of Girls and why it is that she regards as "feminist" a show that wouldn't look much different at all were it written by a men's rights advocate. That is: If it's a young woman telling stories about how young women are narcissistic, selfish, manipulative, backstabbing, man-obsessed nightmares, it's saying something different about women than if "a fifty year old man" were telling the story.

Whoops.

For the record, it is eminently possible to write a show with complex female characters who are flawed and fail and flailing that doesn't look exactly like a show about women that was written by a misogynist.

Open Wide...

Assvertising

[Content Note: Rape culture.]

Shaker Mod aforalpha passed this one along to me—an advert called "Would You Whip It Out at Work?" for UrgentRx Critical Care Aspirin:

Two middle-aged white men are working in a warehouse, loading (or unloading?) boxes onto a pallet. White Man #1 turns to the camera and says, "Am I ready to whip it out? You betcha. I can feel my package in my pocket right now. Having it there makes me feel better. And if old man Dan here needed it, I wouldn't hesitate. I'd whip it out and give it to him." He reaches into his pocket as White Man #2 says, "Whoa whoa whoa whoa!" and holds up his hands. He pulls out a package of UrgentRx Critical Care Aspirin.

Cut to graphics of the product, with a male voiceover saying, "UrgentRx Critical Care Aspirin. It's the flavored fast powder you take right away—" graphic of a disembodied female mouth sticking the tongue out to receive a dose of powder "—to help improve the odds of surviving a heart attack." The camera zooms in through the open mouth and we return to the men in the warehouse.

White Man #2 says, standing with his hand on White Man #1's shoulder, "You'd whip yours out and give it to me?"

White Man #1 pokes him in the chest and replies, "That's the kind of guy I am."

White Man #2 says, "Aww, thanks, man."

Cut to graphics reading: "Whip it out. Save a life." The male voiceover says, "Learn how to save your bacon at whipitouturx.com."
Ha ha DO YOU GET IT?! It's FUNNY because it's like the guy is talking about whipping out HIS DICK, which would be a sexual assault, but he's really talking about whipping out MEDICINE. Ha ha OH MY ACHING SIDES.

teaspoon icon If you would like to contact UrgentRx and let them know that using sexual assault as a "hilarious" double-entendre in their advertising is a real bullshit move, you can contact them here, leave a note on their Facebook page, and/or tweet at them: @urgentRx.

Open Wide...

Whut.

[Content Note: Violent crime.]

I've never read Leif G.W. Persson's Backstrom books, so I have no idea what the tone of the books is, but the description of this television show based on the series is raising all the red flags:

The series centers on Detective Everett Backstrom (The Office's Rainn Wilson), an offensive, irascible detective, as he tries, and fails, to change his self-destructive behavior. Throughout the series, Backstrom leads his team, the Serious Crimes Unit, as they navigate Portland's most sensitive cases.
At this point, I wonder: Has comedic actor Rainn Wilson been cast in a serious drama, or is this basically Law & Order: SVU reimagined as a comedy? And apparently it's the latter.
"[Bones creator/exec producer] Hart Hanson and Rainn Wilson are the perfect combination of creative vision and on-screen talent to bring this one-of-a-kind character and story like Backstrom to Fox," said Fox chairman Kevin Reilly. "I've been in business with Hart for a long time, and not only does he have a rare gift for infusing darker themes with relatable humor, he's one of the best showrunners out there today." Added 20th TV chairmen Dana Walden and Gary Newman, "There are so few creators out there with the genuine ability to mix great procedural storytelling with humor, and Hart Hanson is one of those guys. Getting another show on the air with him has been a top priority of this company."

Backstrom reunites Wilson with his Office co-star Mindy Kaling, who toplines Fox's The Mindy Project, and Reilly. "Fox is the perfect home for this fun and disturbed piece of entertainment," Wilson said.
A "fun and disturbed piece of entertainment" about "the Serious Crimes Unit" and "Portland's most sensitive cases." Sure. It's about time we had an entire series that was one giant rape joke.

[Related Reading: Oh, Crap.]

Open Wide...

TV Corner: Brooklyn Nine-Nine

image of the cast of Brooklyn Nine-Nine

[Content Note: Spoilers for Brooklyn Nine-Nine and discussion of a rape culture joke.]

I know there are a lot of posts about TV shows this week, but the new television season started in the US this week, so there are a lot of new shows to discuss!

So, Brooklyn Nine-Nine, a new cop comedy on Fox, probably isn't a show I would have watched, except that I love like half the cast. So I watched the first two episodes to see if it was any good. And I was very pleasantly surprised!

First of all, let's talk about the cast: In the above picture, there are seven people, three of whom are women and four of whom are people of color. The show has passed the Bechdel Test, and even in the first two episodes, each character has been fleshed out, with varying degrees of success, beyond lazy stereotypes.

Andre Braugher plays the new hard-nosed but awesomely witty captain who won't let Andy Samberg jerk around all day anymore, and also the captain is gay. Also. In both episodes so far, his character has had serious things to say about what it has meant for his career to be a black gay police officer. Whoa.

Last night's episode was centered around police cars being vandalized with spray-painted dicks (lol), and the perpetrator turns out to be the police commissioner's kid. (Or deputy commissioner, or whatever. Some police muckety-muck.) Which puts the investigating officer (Samberg) in an awkward position. Originally, he decides to prioritize his career and lets the kid go, but then his new captain says smart things that make him reconsider.

He arrives to make the arrest, and the father defends his terrible, privileged, white son who he continually bails out of trouble so he avoids accountability—a defense which ends with (paraphrased from memory): "You can't arrest him. He's going to Duke next year on a lacrosse scholarship!"

[Reference, if you need it.]

I almost did a real-life spit take!

This was, in my estimation, what I call a rape culture joke:
Rape jokes uphold rape culture, while rape culture jokes seek to examine, challenge, dismantle it.

And even still, I understand and respect that some survivors do not and cannot find any rape-related humor funny.

I don't think that makes them "oversensitive." I think that means they've got a different sensitivity than I do.
The joke here, which followed a scene in which Braugher's character observes that never holding this kid accountable isn't doing him any favors, traces a direct line between privilege, entitlement, lack of accountability for harm, and hostility toward consent.

Maybe Brooklyn Nine-Nine will turn out to be total garbage, but, for the moment, it's got my attention.

Open Wide...

The Onion Fails Again, Or Why Sexual Abuse Is Not a Joke

by Shaker Mary, who can be found fighting the good fight on Twitter: @OHTheMaryD.

[Content Note: Rape jokes; misogynist slur; discussion of sexual violence statistics.]

On Tuesday, August 20th, The Onion ran a piece titled, "Adolescent Girl Reaching Age Where She Starts Exploring Stepfather's Body." Yes, it is as horrible as you think it is. I refuse to link to the original article, but here's the gist:

"It can be awkward and even a little scary for an adolescent girl when she experiences all these strange new feelings and starts to notice the sexual desires of her mother's husband…"

[…]

"But it's all part of growing up, and she should know that she is taking a very important step in life. It won't be long before her childhood is gone forever." Denton added that if the eighth-grader is confused or troubled by such experiences, she should try talking to friends her age who are going through the exact same thing.
In trying to use satire to critique the way the media covers sex abuse cases, The Onion focused on a fictional victim, sexualized young girls, and missed the mark completely. This can be added to the list of failures from a publication that thought it was the height of satire to call a 9-year-old Black girl a "cunt".

A 13-year-old in a sexual relationship with an adult is nothing to joke about. Incest is a very real and hellish experience that far too many people either have or are currently living through and to satirize that is not only offensive, it's disgusting and dangerous.

The rape and sexual abuse of children is not a joke.

It's not a joke when, according to the Administration for Children and Families, 18.5% of 9- to 11-year-olds, 26.3% of 12- to 14-year-olds, and 21.8% of 15- to 17-year-olds are sexually abused (these are conservative estimates, since sexual abuse is one of the most underreported crimes).

It's not a joke when, according to the American Psychological Association, 30% of the perpetrators of child sexual abuse are family members and the presence of a stepfather in the home doubles the risk of sexual victimization for girls.

It's not a joke when children with disabilities are 4 to 10 times more vulnerable to sexual abuse then non-disabled children.

We live in a society where news reporters go on national TV and lament the lost "promising futures" of convicted rapists and say very little about the teenage girl who was brutalized by them. Where, in a small town in Indiana, a pregnant 14-year-old is called a "slut" and a "whore" by her neighbors just because she's a rape victim.

We, as a society, already fail to treat rape and sexual assault/abuse claims with the gravity they deserve, continually shifting the blame off the perpetrators and blaming the victim. We have no business satirizing something that is already not taken seriously.

Open Wide...

Rape Joke, A Poem

With a content note that this is very difficult to read, so take a moment to assess your spoons, I direct to you Patricia Lockwood's "Rape Joke." Because, though difficult, it is also very brilliant and very powerful.

Yes. Yes, this. Yes.

Open Wide...

On Patton Oswalt's "Rape Joke Epiphany"

[Content Note: Rape culture; rape-related "humor."]

Everyone in the multiverse (and thanks to each and every one of you) has emailed me about comedian Patton Oswalt's "reversal" on rape jokes, which he published Friday, buried at the end of a long post about professional thievery, heckling, and rape jokes. Because the subject of rape jokes is one on which I've spilled a lot of digital ink, a lot of people are quite reasonably wondering what I think about it.

Well, I have a few thoughts.

I'm relieved—for all the reasons that have been well-documented in this space—that there is a popular comedian who (ostensibly) won't be telling rape jokes anymore. At least not ones that make survivors a punchline.

What follows will inevitably be interpreted, by those inclined to take it that way, as the insufficient gratitude of an angry feminist who is never satisfied, which I cannot control. But Oswalt says he is listening, and I see no reason not to take him at his word and offer my criticism.

Because there is a big hole in the middle of his piece—a big hole where no acknowledgment of the rape jokes he has told and an apology for those harmful jokes should be. If he now understands, as is his assertion, the harm caused by the telling of rape jokes that normalize rape and potentially trigger survivors, surely a meaningful reversal must include accountability.

He talks about Daniel Tosh's rape joke, and his reactions to it, and his defenses of rape jokes. But he does not say, straightforwardly, "I told rape jokes. And I am sorry I did that, now that I see the harm that they cause." Instead, he merely offers, "I'm a man. I get to be wrong. And I get to change."

And there is some bit of dishonesty in his claims that he never really got it until now, because at the end of an extended sequence in Comedians of Comedy, in which he assumes the persona of a murderer and rapist, talking to the camera/audience as if to his victim, he falls out of character and says, "Please cut the camera off. I just creeped myself out." It isn't that Patton Oswalt wasn't familiar with the rape culture previous to this moment: He was, like all privileged men, intimately familiar with its tropes and narratives. It's just that he was acting as a purveyor and defender of the rape culture. He was able to identify with rapists, but not survivors.

There is no neutral in the rape culture.

To this point, he was not merely insensitive out of ignorance; he was an agent of the rape culture who told jokes upholding that culture and who tried to discredit critics using well-worn tactics deployed by defenders of the rape culture. He says he was doing it as a comic—"This was about censorship, and the limits of comedy, and the freedom to create and fuck up while you hone what you create."—but, irrespective of the motivations and context of his deployment of silencing strategies, he was effectively (if not intentionally) doing it as a useful tool of the rape culture.

More is owed than "whoops."

I am a survivor of rape, and I have held myself accountable for perpetuating the rape culture: "I have done it. I have perpetuated the rape culture. We have all done it. We were born into it, and we were all socialized to have contempt for consent." One of many examples.

There is no shame in acknowledging we have expressed hostility for consent in one way or another. This is how trust is restored and maintained.

But Oswalt never quite gets there.

And while I certainly appreciate that Oswalt has has some change of heart and mind, this is A Big Problem:

There is a collective consciousness that can detect the presence (and approach) of something good or bad, in society or the world, before any hard "evidence" exists. It's happening now with the concept of "rape culture." Which, by the way, isn't a concept. It's a reality. I'm just not the one who's going to bring it into focus. But I've read enough viewpoints, and spoken to enough of my female friends (comedians and non-comedians) to know it isn't some vaporous hysteria, some false meme or convenient catch-phrase.
There is only no evidence of the rape culture if one discredits the lived experience of millions and millions of women (and men) who experience the prolific manifestations of the rape culture every goddamn day of our lives. Not to put too fine a point on it, but only in rape cases are victims of the crime not considered reliable eyewitnesses to their own victimization. Discrediting women as unreliable narrators, setting aside "evidence" as something that only Totally Objective Arbiters (ahem) can assess after filtering information through their Validity Prisms, is a key tool of the rape culture.

I realize Oswalt set "evidence" in scare quotes, but he follows it immediately by a reassurance that he has Objectively Determined After Speaking to Women that the rape culture isn't "some vaporous hysteria, some false meme or convenient catch-phrase." As opposed to, I dunno, all the other stuff feminists whinge about. Like the rape culture. Until he decided it wasn't.

Two of the most crucial means by which the rape culture will be dismantled are: Accountability and empowering all women (not just the Exceptional Women in one's life) as credible reporters on our lived experiences. I wish I had seen some trace of each in this well-circulated epiphany.

No cookies today, I'm afraid.

Open Wide...

The Parks and Rec Open Thread

image of Leslie Knope being hugged by the entire Gergich family
This family is terrible. Apparently.

[Content Note: Rape culture; rape jokes; bullying.]

I don't guess I need to tell you how excited I was to have two episodes of Parks and Recreation waiting for me at the end of last week. And I don't guess I need to tell you, either, that I would love more than anything to be able to write an enthusiastically happy post about how much I loved both episodes.

But, unfortunately, I can't do that.

1. Because the first episode prominently featured Patton Oswalt, who is a fan of rape jokes. He has tweeted such gems as:
"Uh-oh, Spaghettios..." -- Pelican Bay inmate before he's raped by his cellmate, "Spaghettios" DiCenzo
—and his comedy special, Comedians of Comedy, included an extended sequence in which he assumes the persona of a murderer and rapist, talking to the camera/audience as if to his victim. Because comedy.

That the above sequence happens at a log cabin only made the entire P&R arc where he and Leslie are living at a cabin all the more heinous for me to watch.

2. And because the second episode was perhaps the worst Jerry-hating episode of all time. And not just an entire episode built around everyone hating Jerry, but about how, if Jerry is removed from the group, everyone immediately turns on Tom, because "there's always a Jerry." I like Jerry, and I don't want to see him bullied. I don't want to watch other characters bully him, which makes me not like them so much. And I sure as shit don't want to see one more scene of Leslie and Ben perplexedly trying to figure out why Gayle would love Jerry or find him attractive.

The treatment of Jerry has always been the show's weakest spot, and I feel like the writers are trying to counter criticism by doubling-down on it. As if exposing us to more contempt for Jerry is somehow going to magically make it funny. It doesn't work. And even if it weren't mean-spirited garbage, it doesn't even seem consistent within the show's established characterizations. Even Chris, who is nice to EVERYONE and constantly expresses his fear of hurting other people, is now passive-aggressively mocking Jerry in order to win a bet with Ron? Nope. NOPE.

I am disappointed, Parks & Rec. I expect more.

Open Wide...