Showing posts with label Iowa. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Iowa. Show all posts

Primarily Speaking

image of a cartoon version of me riding on the back of a chubby unicorn, pictured in front of a patriotic stars-and-stripes graphic, to which I've added text reading: 'The Democratic Primary 2020: Let's do this thing.'

Welcome to another edition of Primarily Speaking, because presidential primaries now begin fully one million years before the election!

This weekend was Iowa's infamous Hall of Fame Celebration, which unofficially marks the start of campaigning for the Democratic Iowa Caucus, and 19 of the eleventy-seven candidates showed up to try to convince Iowans that they should be the next president.

There is coverage of the weekend events at Iowa Starting Line, which has a bunch of great pix: Early Scenes from the Biggest Iowa Caucus Yet.

At the Atlantic, Edward-Isaac Dovere is perhaps less enthusiastic about the political circus, lol:
When Winston Churchill said democracy was "the worst form of government except for all those other forms," he did not foresee the tailgate party that descended on northwest Iowa yesterday morning.

Former Representative Beto O'Rourke's campaign rented a taco truck and dished out free chorizo. Senator Amy Klobuchar's gang rattled little white bells. Former Representative John Delaney's team had a bagpiper and a mini blimp overhead. Some of Senator Elizabeth Warren's supporters wore bright feather boas, with a few women dancing up and down the street playing Dolly Parton's "9 to 5" on a portable speaker. South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg hosted a barbecue at a park and played keys with a local band while wearing sunglasses. Senator Bernie Sanders marched from a McDonald's alongside striking workers and activists.

...One tense moment occurred when Sanders arrived with his parade of workers through a crowd of Harris staffers, who started chanting, "We deserve a woman president!"
LOLOLOL all of that sounds pretty fun to me, but then I'm a person who willingly writes this thread every day, so.

Senators Elizabeth Warren and Cory Booker were standouts in Iowa, writes Natasha Korecki at Politico: "In the early state where field organization has traditionally mattered the most, Sen. Cory Booker and Sen. Elizabeth Warren have quietly and patiently concentrated their resources toward building grassroots machines designed to power them on caucus night. It showed here on Sunday as 19 Democratic presidential candidates converged for the first time in one venue to make their five-minute pitch to the party faithful." Smart cookies.

In other Warren news, here's another Washington Post piece about how she's got a plan for that. And that. And that. And that. And that other thing over there. And this. And that. And that. (I'm not complaining!) While I'm glad that Warren is getting favorable coverage about her intense policy strategy now, I fear that the other shoe will drop soon, and the same press that now commends her preparedness will start accusing her of being "over-prepared" and "too wonky" and all the same shit they threw at our last, very prepared, female nominee.

Also in Iowa, Senator Kamala Harris debuted (as far as I know) a new riff on why she, as a former prosecutor, is uniquely positioned to take on Donald Trump, and I really hate this:

Harris, standing onstage speaking into a microphone at an Iowa event: We got a President of the United States who made a whole lot of promises and betrayed the American people. What did we get? A lot of broken promises. So we need to prosecute the case.

And, Iowa, I'mma tell you: There's a rap sheet fulla evidence to make the case! [audience applause] Let's look at what happened.

He promised healthcare and then he tried to rip healthcare away from millions of people. What's that called? Healthcare fraud.

He said he was for working people, then he passed a tax bill benefitting the top one percent and the biggest corporations in this country. That's tax fraud.

He believes the president of Russia and a North Korean dictator over the word of the American intelligence community. Securities fraud.

And then he claims to be the best president we've seen in a generation. Well, I say let's call Barack Obama, 'cuz that's identity fraud!
What? No. Lying about healthcare isn't "healthcare fraud." The bait-and-switch of conservatives' class warfare isn't "tax fraud." And "securities fraud" has nothing to do with national security. Is that supposed to be a pun? I don't get it. I don't get any of this. And, to be honest, I find it extraordinarily unhelpful to be conflating Trump's shitty politics with criminal behavior when he's committed actual crimes that need to be prosecuted. This is a hot mess. Flush that one down the turd tunnel, Senator Harris. I beg you.

* * *

As I mentioned on Friday, Joe Biden was planning to skip the events in Iowa, which he did (to instead attend his granddaughter's graduation), and will instead show up in Iowa this week on the same day as Trump will be in Iowa, because of course. Biden is avoiding any event that looks like a Democratic primary and is trying to look like he's already won the nomination and is running against Trump in the general. That might be smart if he weren't already dropping in the polls.

Biden is also banking on his belief that he knows the Democratic base better than anyone else and that everyone else is wrong about it: "From his schedule to his messaging to his policy positions, the former vice president is carving a divergent path through the primaries based on a theory that few of his rivals appear to believe — that the Democratic base isn't nearly as liberal or youthful as everyone thinks." We'll see about that.

And in other Biden news, he's getting the same "old and sick" treatment from Fox News to which Hillary Clinton was subjected: "One month after Joe Biden announced his run for president, several Fox News stars have already begun quietly pushing rumors that the 76-year-old ex-veep is in poor health. Since the end of May, Fox Business Network and Fox News star Lisa 'Kennedy' Montgomery and Fox News primetime host Sean Hannity have speculated on-air, on at least four separate occasions, that the current Democratic presidential frontrunner is secretly dealing with health issues." Epic eyeroll.

* * *

This is not good, and this is one of many reasons why I keep urging people (voters and party leaders) to pay attention to Julián Castro: "Democratic presidential candidates are squandering a critical early opportunity to mobilize Latino voters ahead of 2020, potentially easing Donald Trump's path to reelection, according to leading Latino political operatives in battleground states. Interviews with more than a dozen strategists and organizers revealed rising alarm at the lack of attention being paid to Latinos in swing states where they could decide the outcome of both the Democratic primary and the general election." Castro is deeply connected to this community, was first out with a comprehensive (and excellent) immigration reform plan, and is, to be blunt, one of the best resources generally that the Democratic Party has. He's also one of the best candidates in this field.

Are you listening, Beto O'Rourke (and about six other candidates)? "'Democrats facing a steep uphill climb to win back the Senate want Beto O'Rourke to reconsider his long-shot bid for president and take another look at running for the Senate in Texas, especially if his White House bid fails to pick up momentum,' the Hill reports. 'They feel the same way about two other White House hopefuls who are polling at around 1 percent or lower: former Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper and Montana Gov. Steve Bullock.'"

Relatedly, Mayor Pete Buttigieg apparently enacted a great solution to help undocumented immigrants access social services in South Bend, but he's not talking about it on the campaign trail. He should.

Senator Bernie Sanders suddenly appreciates incrementalism and political calculation when he has to defend his own votes: "Sanders was asked on CNN's State of the Union about his support for bills containing the Hyde Amendment, which bans using Medicaid funds for abortions unless the woman's life is in danger or the pregnancy arises from rape or incest. 'Well, look, sometimes in a large bill you have to vote for things you don't like,' Sanders said." Okay for him, but no one else, I guess. Like literally everything else.

Andrew Yang maybe didn't think about this as much as he should have before tweeting it: "I think that every four years there should be at least one presidential candidate who comes from outside the government. It seems positive to have different points-of-view." Dude, I know that's a defense of your own vanity run, but it's a highly questionable position to advocate while Donald fucking Trump sits in the Oval Office.

John Hickenlooper is still definitely running for president — and I think he's stealing Kamala Harris' snacks!

Talk about these things! Or don't. Whatever makes you happy. Life is short.

Open Wide...

Iowa Legislature Passes "Heartbeat" Abortion Bill

[Content Note: War on agency; anti-choice oppression.]

The Iowa legislature's Republican majority has passed a bill that would ban abortions after the point at which a fetal heartbeat can be detected, which is around the sixth week of pregnancy and often before many women et. al. know they are pregnant. No Democrats voted for the bill, which now goes to the desk of Republican Governor Kim Reynolds.

"The time is now," bill manager Rep. Shannon Lundgren, R-Peosta, said early Tuesday afternoon when debate started on Senate File 359 that started in 2017 as a prohibition on the transfer of fetal body tissue. At about 11 p.m., the House passed the bill 51-46 and sent it to the Senate where debate started shortly before 1 a.m.

It's time for the GOP to "quit playing doctor and stop using your positions of power to harass, control, and disrespect Iowa women," Sen. Joe Bolkcom, D-Iowa City, said. And Sen. Liz Mathis, D-Hiawatha, said the bill isn't about reducing the number of abortions. Instead, its sponsors seem "hell-bent on making a name for those who are set to challenge Roe v. Wade," she said.

"Never mind how women's rights will be run over by the Family Leader bus that's headed to the U.S. Supreme Court," Mathis said.

Even though it was the middle of the night, Sen. Rick Bertrand, R-Sioux City, who led a group of Republicans who refused to vote for budget bills until getting a chance to vote for the fetal heartbeat bill, said it was a "good day for life."

He acknowledged this bill is an attempt to "take another run at Roe v. Wade," he said about the 1973 Supreme Court decision to allow abortion, and predicted the bill will be the vehicle for overturning that decision. "We're not hiding that."
Grim stuff.

Presuming Reynolds signs the bill into law, as she is expected to do, the law will be challenged in court. Which is precisely what its supporters are hoping.

And once again, the future of reproductive rights hangs in the balance. But do tell me again how there was "no difference" between an abusive misogynist with zero respect for women's agency and consent who chose as his running mate one of the most virulently anti-choice politicians in the nation, and a feminist who has spent her life advocating for healthcare access, including and especially reproductive healthcare.

Seethe.

Open Wide...

Trump in Iowa: A Disaster Tale

Last night, Donald Trump had another presidential rally in Iowa, because he is a vainglorious fascist who needs literal applause to survive. And lots of neat stuff happened there, obviously — but, before we get to that, first we need to talk about the open letter to Trump published by the editorial board of the Cedar Rapids Gazette ahead of his arrival. Because it is amazing.

The last time you visited us, you were a candidate for the presidency. Now, you're the commander in chief.

...Mr. President, the campaign is over. You won. Now is not the time to rally. Now is the time to sell your policies, listen to Americans with a stake in those efforts, and govern.

Iowans have questions and concerns about your plans. They can't be heard over the cheers of a rally.
The editors then go on to explain basic policy to Trump, on issues he consistently gets wrong, and repeatedly recommends he meet with the people of Iowa while he's there to learn what the impacts would be of his garbage proposals. The piece ends thus:
That's a lot of ground to cover while you're on the ground in Iowa. But we think it's critical you understand the real world implications of these and many other policies your administration is proposing.

We concede it's not as much fun as hearing the cheers and chants of folks convinced you're making America great again. But it's what presidents do.

Again, welcome to Cedar Rapids, and safe travels. Mr. President.
DAMN. It's one of the best things I've read about Trump in some time, and you should definitely read the entire thing.

So that was the backdrop against which his visit for a Make Clapsounds for Trump Again rally was to take place: Local grown-ups asking the baby king to try to behave like a president while he was in town.

And here's how Trump came to the stage (with grinning white girls taking selfies as one of them throws a "zieg heil" behind him [edit: or maybe she was dabbing, but isn't it fun, ahem, that the U.S. president is so terrible either one seems possible?]):

Thank you, everybody. It is great to be back in the incredible, beautiful, great state of...IOWA! [cheers and applause] Home of the greatest wrestlers in the world, including our friend Dan Gable. Some of the great, great wrestlers of the world. Right? We love those wrestlers. It's always terrific to be able to leave that Washington swamp [cheers] and spend time with the truly hardworking people. We call 'em American patriots. Amazing people.
Everything about that is clearly incredible, but I especially like the part where he says no one works hard in Washington.

Naturally, he isn't talking about himself, because he is working hard all the time to come up with tremendous ideas like the one he shared with the crowd later in his nearly hour-long rambling argle-bargle address.

And we're thinking of something that's unique. We're talking about [pauses and swishes his hand through the air] the Southern border. Lots of sun, lots of heat. We're thinking about building the wall as a solar wall, so it creates energy [applause] and pays for itself. And this way, Mexico will have to pay much less money! And that's good. Right? Is that good? [cheers] You're the first group I've told that to! A solar wall. Makes sense. Let's see. We're working it out. We'll see. Solar wall. [swishes hand through air] Panels. Beautiful. I mean, actually, think of it. The higher it goes, the more valuable it is. [chuckles] It's like— [audience laughter] Pretty good imagination, right? [he points at his head] Good? My idea. So we have a good shot. That's one of the places that solar really does work. The tremendous sun and heat. It really does work there. So we'll see what happens with that. That would be great. And I think we could make it look beautiful, too. It would really look beautiful. So that would be nice.
Sure.

Among the other big league ideas Trump proposed last night was the creation of a law that has existed since 1996: "Trump in a rally on Wednesday evening said immigrants who enter the United States should not be eligible for welfare benefits for five years, though such a law has already existed for 20 years. ...Known as the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA), the legislation was passed during the administration of former President Bill Clinton and said that an immigrant is 'not eligible for any Federal means-tested public benefit' for 5 years, which starts on the date the immigrant enters the country."

Having been through the immigration process with Iain, I can confirm that this law indeed already exists!

Details. Minor details.

The important thing is that Trump is winning. Winning so much. Just driving everyone crazy with all the win, win, winning.

And we are making such incredible progress. We are making progress like nobody can believe. These people [points at media] are being driven craaaaazy. Crazy. [applause] I mean, they have phony witch hunts going against me; they have everything going. And you know what? All we do is win, win, win. We won last night. They can't believe it. They say, "What is going on? WHAT IS GOING ON?!" [applause] We won last night. And even the worst of 'em said, "That was a big win for Trump. I couldn't believe it, actually." [points at media] Thank you very much, folks. I appreciate it. [audience laughter]
I'm not sure to what win he's referring. It must have been so big that my puny ears couldn't handle hearing about it.

So, in sum: Trump believes he is nonstop winning. He's got loads of great ideas, including laws that have existed for two decades. And he continues to be an embarrassing wreck who is only happy when he is standing on a stage basking in the sound of applause from people who don't know anything.

Everything is fine in America.

*jumps into Christmas tree*

Open Wide...

Iowa Caucus Wrap-Up

So, after a day of caucusing-a-go-go in Iowa yesterday, the Democratic side is still too close to call. Either Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders will win by the thinnest of margins.

In some places, ties were decided by coin toss, and Clinton reportedly won all five (or six, depending on the source) flips of the coin.

Lots of people are losing their shit that democracy could be decided with the flip of a coin, but the whole caucus format is absurd, with people shouting at each other and trying to convince people to literally move from one side of a room to another, and a breaking a tie with a coin toss might be the least absurd part of it.

I note there are a lot of people who are outraged about settling a tie with a coin toss, but cool with frontloading the primary schedule with disproportionately white states. Ahem.

[ETA. Here's some additional information about those coin tosses, and how they didn't actually matter as much as originally reported.]

After failing to register entirely with caucus-goers, Martin O'Malley has suspended his campaign. Goodbye, East Coast Gavin Newsom!

But all left-leaning people were winners last night, because none of our candidates were Donald Trump!

On the other side of the aisle...

image of Ted Cruz's face on a US flag background, with a banner over his head reading '#1 Worst!'

Ted Cruz pulled out a win over Donald Trump, with Marco Rubio having a surprisingly good showing in third place. Mike Huckabee tanked so hard he suspended his campaign. Seeya, shitlord!

After being declared the winner, Cruz gave what is the worst victory speech I believe I've ever heard. He sounded less like a president and more like the principal of a conservative evangelical elementary school, telling the kids about the big field trip to the dump.

Next stop: New Hampshire! One week from today.

Open Wide...

Today in the Radical Gay Feminist Agenda

[Content Note: Homophobia; anti-feminism.]

Sounds legit:

"By 2020, [feminists] want 50/50 in the state houses and the U.S. House and Senate. They want 50 percent women and 50 percent men, they want 50/50, they want equality," [Iowa Republican National Committee member Tamara Scott] said. "So my laugh is, then why wouldn't you want equality in a marriage? Why aren't those same women wanting that same argument at home? Because we know children do better when they're raised by their biological parents."

This led [RNC member Carolyn McClarty of Oklahoma] to explain that "the extreme feminist movement and the gay liberation movement really is using same-sex marriage as a way to destroy marriage."

"The feminist movement, they've been against marriage from the beginning, against traditional marriage, and it was up until the Massachusetts court case in 2003 where they recognized same-sex marriage in Massachusetts that they kind of changed their tune," she said. "And now they see that this would also destroy marriage, so they're for same-sex marriage."
Well, it's always fun anytime we pretend that feminists are monolithically united on any issue, but I'm just going to speak for myself here, because I'm just that kind of a pain in the ass: Advocating for an expansion of marriage is not engineering its destruction. Two plus two does not equal zero.

That said, if we're talking about the destruction of the institution of marriage as previously defined—the transfer of ownership of a woman from her father to her husband—then I am GUILTY AS CHARGED for being all the fuck for the destruction of the institution of marriage.

See also: Defining marriage exclusively on the basis of its being a child-making enterprise. Sorry, ladies, but my uterus is too busy emitting Radical Gay Feminist Agenda Gamma Rays of Ultimate Doom to be hosting fetuses. MY BODY MY CHOICE!

Open Wide...

In the News

Here is some stuff in the news today...

President Obama has accepted the resignation of Secretary of Veterans Affairs Eric Shinseki following revelations of what Shinseki described as "an 'indefensible' lack of integrity among some senior leaders of the VA health-care system," which resulted in "systemic" problems including Veterans Administration officials having "falsified records to hide the amount of time veterans had to wait for medical appointments."

[Content Note: Guns] The House of Representatives has passed "a small appropriation that will improve the accuracy of the national database used to conduct background checks prior to many gun sales. It's a modest step forward, given significant loopholes in the federal background system which allow many felons to evade background checks altogether—Congress has not yet addressed these loopholes. Nevertheless, this appropriation is a significant victory for supporters of gun regulation during an era when the National Rifle Association appears to have a veto power over legislation."

[CN: Guns; violence] Meanwhile, Joni Ernst, a Republican Senate candidate from Iowa referred to Elliot Rodger's killing spree as an "unfortunate accident" in the middle of defending gun rights: "[W]hat happened in that shooting and that stabbing is an absolute tragedy. However, I remain firm in my commitment to the Second Amendment. I have been endorsed by the NRA in this race, and again, just because of a horrible, horrible tragedy, I don't believe we should be infringing upon people's Second Amendment rights." Asked about her political ad that "contains violent imagery pointing a gun directly at the viewer and vowing to quote 'shoot [her opponents] down,'" and whether she'd change the ad, she said, "I would not—no. This unfortunate accident happened after the ad."

[CN: Violence; police brutality. Images of injury at link.] Nineteen-month-old toddler Bounkham Phonesavanh was severely injured during a police raid, when a SWAT team raided the family's home in the middle of the night and used a stun grenade, which "landed in his playpen and exploded on his pillow right in his face." Police say "they bought drugs from the house, and came back with a no-knock warrant to arrest a man known to have drugs and weapons. 'There was no clothes, no toys, nothing to indicate that there was children present in the home. If there had been then we'd have done something different,' [Cornelia police Chief Rick Darby] said." I don't even know where to begin.

Heads-up: "Ford Motor Co. is recalling 1.4 million SUVs and other cars in North America to fix steering, rust and floor mat problems." If you have a 2008-2011 Ford Escape or Mercury Mariner small SUV, a 2011-2013 Ford Explorer SUV, a 2010-2014 Taurus sedan, or a 2006-2011 Ford Fusion, Mercury Milan, Lincoln Zephyr, or Lincoln MKZ, check out the details of the recall at the link.

Former Microsoft chief executive Steve Ballmer will reportedly purchase the LA Clippers from Donald Sterling for $2 billion.

And finally: HAPPY GREYHOUND!

Open Wide...

In the News

Here is some stuff in the news today!

[Content Note: War on agency] The Iowa House has passed a bill banning telemedical abortion, which allowed "women to consult with doctors through video technology before being prescribed the abortion-inducing pill. It has been heralded as a safe and effective form of reproductive health care since its implementation five years ago, and allows women living in rural areas to obtain the medication without having to travel." So let's definitely ban it. Perfect.

[CN: Homophobia] The Arizona Senate has passed a bill "which would effectively allow businesses to deny services to LGBT people" under the auspices of "religious freedom." Fucking gross. There's no way this will pass constitutional muster.

[CN: Guns; police brutality] A 17-year-old boy was shot and killed by police in Georgia after he answered the door with a Wii remote in his hand, which the officer thought was a gun. Jesus Jones. I want to note, again, that our collective unwillingness to address our garbage gun policies is making police objectively less safe (as it is making all of us less safe), and surely there are individual officers whose fear about gun proliferation will inform an urge to use deadly force in situations where none is needed. That is not to absolve these officers of their crimes, not even a little bit, but to highlight yet another consequence of our failure to take action on guns. My point is not to make excuses for the officers, but to address what our communal responsibility is in having failed their victims.

[CN: Guns] Speaking of guns: "Rep. Jared Wright leaves loaded handgun in House committee room." The Republican Colorado state legislator says "he often carries a concealed handgun inside the Capitol" and: "I feel it's my duty to be a first responder wherever I am at. That's why I carry it." Good grief.

Astrophysicists have "made use of a high-energy X-ray observatory to perform an autopsy on a dead star," figuring out how stars explode into supernovas. Neat!

Sir Patrick Stewart has some fun on Twitter after the Guardian "outs" him. My favorite: "Well, @guardian it makes for a nice change...at least I didn't wake up to the internet telling me I was dead again." LOL.

The cast of the Fantastic Four reboot has been revealed, and they are: Jamie Bell, Michael B. Jordan, Kate Mara, and Miles Teller. Are you excited for this casting? Y/N?

Finally: Here is a picture of Peter Dinklage on the cover of the latest issue of Esquire. You're welcome.

image of actor Peter Dinklage on the cover of Esquire magazine, looking super foxy

Open Wide...

Reproductive Rights Updates: Iowa, Missouri, New Mexico, & National

Hello all! I'd like to start off apologizing for my absence lately. Offline life has been in upheaval for months and has only really just now settled down. So, if you were glad I was gone: too bad for you now! Muwahahaha!

In Iowa, a judge recently temporarily halted the Board of Medicine's ban on people being able to use teleconferencing for medication abortion services (which, as you can imagine, mostly serves rural citizens).

Polk County District Judge Karen Romano ordered a temporary stay on a rule passed by the Iowa Board of Medicine, which effectively would ban use of the first-in-the-nation video-conferencing system. The medical board said its rule was based on concern for patient safety. But Planned Parenthood supporters said the rule was a political attempt to limit rural women’s access to legal abortions.

[...]

Romano wrote that medical board members “have not supplied the court with any evidence whatsoever that telemedicine abortions are unsafe or negatively impact patient health.”

The judge expressed sympathy for Planned Parenthood’s argument that the medical board’s rule singled out the private agency’s video system, which has similarities to other health care providers’ systems.

“With respect to the lack of an in-person meeting, it is peculiar, as petitioners point out, that the board would mandate this for abortion services and not any other telemedicine practices in Iowa,” Romano wrote. “There is simply no evidence the court can rely on to come to the conclusion that the telemedicine abortion procedures, which have been offered for five years without issue, do not ‘protect the health and safety of patients.’ ”
The Board of Health is insistent that they are so, so right (they are not so, so right) and the fight will continue in court. The Des Moines Register editorial board strongly believes in the judge's ruling and wrote a kickass editorial yesterday.

***

In Missouri, a federal grand jury has indicted Jedediah Stout with regards to attempting to torch Planned Parenthood clinics early in October.
SPRINGFIELD, Mo. — A federal grand jury returned a two-count indictment Wednesday against Jedediah Stout in connection with arson attempts at the Planned Parenthood center in Joplin on Oct. 3 and 4.

Stout, 29, of Joplin, had been charged with the failed attempts to torch the Planned Parenthood building at 701 S. Illinois Ave. in a complaint filed Oct. 21 in U.S. District Court in Springfield. The indictment handed up Wednesday replaces that initial complaint.

[...]

Court filings have indicated the existence of some physical evidence allegedly linking Stout to the Planned Parenthood attempts.

When police stopped him a few blocks away after the second attempt at the Planned Parenthood center, he reportedly had a lighter in his possession, and an officer reported that one of his hands smelled of fuel.

Investigators said they have tied Stout to the purchase of a backpack and other components of the device that was used in the first of the Planned Parenthood arson attempts through manufacturing tags, uniform price codes and surveillance footage at a Wal-Mart store in Joplin.

They also allegedly found his fingerprint on a bottle containing accelerants that failed to ignite in the Oct. 3 attempt at Planned Parenthood.
He is still being held without bond.

This is another reminder of what people who work--and volunteer--to provide reproductive health care must face when it comes to their workplace.

***

Open Wide...

Reproductive Rights Updates: Michigan, North Carolina, Kansas, Iowa, North Dakota, Hawaii, & National

Quite a bit has happened in the past few days, some good and some, well, the same anti-autonomy bullshit as ever.

In Michigan, some legislators are trying to make it so more people can legally opt-out of doing their jobs if they don't want to because they choose to believe in some sort of supernatural rule system.

For 35 years, Michigan law has protected health care providers who refuse to perform an abortion on moral or religious grounds.

Hospitals and clinics can't be sued. Doctors and nurses can't lose their jobs for objecting to terminating a pregnancy.

Legislation that could be voted on as early as this week in the Republican-led Legislature would extend the same legal protections for any medical service such as providing contraception or medical marijuana, or taking someone off life support. Employers and health insurers — not just medical providers — also could opt out of paying for services as a matter of conscience.

Supporters say the legislation protects religious freedom and is needed particularly in the wake of the federal health care law mandating employer-provided birth control in their health plans. ...
You know what? If you cannot do your job because of your choice to believe in some set of religious rules, you should find a different fucking job. ESPECIALLY when your job is to provide needed health care and services to people. You are supposed to be a HELPER. Be a sanctimonious asshat when you aren't on the clock.

Also: we see your attempt at a workaround for employers to provide health insurance that includes birth control coverage, Michigan.

***

In North Carolina, eyeballs are now on the governor:
This session, [legislators] presented a bill that would require doctors performing abortions to have admitting privileges at local hospitals, which can be difficult to obtain.

One recent bill would establish civil penalties for doctors who knowingly perform abortions in cases in which the child's sex is the driving factor. Another would broaden so-called protections of conscience and exempt businesses from providing contraception coverage to employees, which its sponsor acknowledges contradicts federal law.
In his last election debate, Gov. McCrory promised he would not sign any new anti-choice legislation into law. His spokesperson said that McCrory will make the decision when the legislation is on his desk.

***

Open Wide...

Reproductive Rights Updates: North Dakota, Kansas, Iowa, Texas, Washington

Quite a bit happening in the anti-autonomy front, much of it this past Friday.

North Dakota made big news over the weekend with what happened Friday--three out of four anti-abortion bills passed. One of those being a resolution to bring "personhood" to ND voters.

Senate Concurrent Resolution 4009, passed and will be on the 2014 general election ballot.

Under the resolution, North Dakota voters will decide whether the state constitution should be amended to protect a human at every stage of life, which some say can mean at conception.

[...]

Senate Bill 2368, which defines life as starting at conception and would prohibit abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy, passed through the House by a 60-32 vote. It was sponsored by Sen. Joe Miller, R-Park River.

The bill also would increase reporting requirements for abortions and prohibit a public higher education institution from contracting with an entity that performs or counsels in favor of abortions.

It does exempt an abortion in the case of a medical emergency.

[...]

Senate Bill 2305, which would require a physician performing an abortion to have admitting privileges at a hospital within 30 miles of the abortion facility, passed 58-34 in the House.
The TRAP legislation is particularly harmful: there is only one clinic in North Dakota and, as noted in the article, a doctor would need to admit ten patients per year to retain privileges. The clinic has only had to admit one person in the past decade.

The sole defeated legislation last Friday was one that was more "personhood"-esque nonsense which would have defined a human as “as an individual member of the species homo sapiens at every stage of development.” It only lost by six votes.

***

Open Wide...

More Terrible Republican Ideas

[Content Note: Domestic violence; sexuality policing.]

Last year, when writing about Congressional Republicans' objections to the reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act, I wryly noted that the GOP was keen to protect the sanctity of traditional domestic violence.

Proving that once again the Republican Party is beyond parody, a bill being considered by the Iowa state House would "prohibit [married] parents of minor children from getting a 'no-fault' divorce" and would require married parents of minor children "to show a spouse was guilty of adultery, had been sent to prison on a felony conviction, had physically or sexually abused someone in the family, or had abandoned the family for at least a year."

No-fault divorce is a critical tool for abused spouses, and/or children being abused by one parent, but there is a segment of the population—insert a Venn diagram overlaying homophobic conservatives and MRAs—that routinely mischaracterizes no-fault divorce as a mechanism of egregious selfishness favored by capricious, man-hating, vengeful mothers who don't care about their children. So we get stupid Think of the Children! rationalizations for trying to unwind a key legal victory for abused women and children. (And men, too.)

A three-member subcommittee debated the bill today. Representative Tedd Gassman, a Republican from Scarville, said he's concerned about the negative impact divorce has on children.

"In my opinion, it's time to look out for the children instead of constantly worrying about the adults," Gassman said.
And naturally, what Gassman means by "look[ing] out for the children" is tasking fathers with policing their daughters' sexuality, so they don't become dirty sluts.
"This basically is an attempt on my part to keep fathers in the home," Gassman said. "I sincerely believe that the family is the foundation of this nation and this nation will go the direction of our families. If our families break up, so will this nation."

…Representative Gassman said the issue is "near and dear" to his heart because his daughter and son-in-law recently divorced, putting his granddaughter at risk.

"There's a 16-year-old girl in this whole mix now. Guess what? What are the possibilities of her being more promiscuous?" Gassman said. "What are the possibilities of all these other things surrounding her life that a 16-year-old girl, with hormones raging, can get herself into?"
I would be so thrilled if I were Gassman's daughter or granddaughter, listening to this blowhard justify a bill that would abet abuse by publicly discussing my marriage and/or sexuality. Which is to say nothing of the horrendo framing that 16-year-old girls "get themselves into" trouble with their "raging hormones."

Anyway. Some people spoke sense in Iowa in response to this absurd proposal:
Rachel Scott of the Iowa Coalition Against Domestic Violence told lawmakers the changes proposed often make homes a more dangerous place.

"One of the things that we’ve seen with places where there is fault divorce is it escalates tension and conflict between the two individuals," Scott said.

Representative Marti Anderson, a Democrat from Des Moines who opposes the bill, said the tension in her childhood home lasted eight years, until her parents divorced back when fault had to be proven.

"The stay-together time was very, very damaging to my family," said Anderson — the oldest of four children, "and although we're all adults now, I'm not sure any of us have ever really gotten past that."

Karl Schilling of the Iowa Organization for Victim Assistance said no-fault divorce was a carefully crafted solution to deal with those kind of problems.
Too bad Republicans have never seen a carefully crafted solution they didn't want to annihilate the fuck out of.

Open Wide...