Showing posts with label Dick Durbin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dick Durbin. Show all posts

On Bill Barr's Senate Judiciary Committee Testimony

Yesterday, Attorney General William Barr testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee regarding the Mueller report, and it was something. (As I mentioned, Aaron Rupar has an extensive Twitter thread with video, if you want to watch the highs and lows.) Barr's performance was so egregiously awful that multiple Democratic senators called for his resignation.

[Senator Kamala Harris stops to talk to reporters and laughs about how they're waiting for her, before agreeing to quickly answer some questions]

Female reporter, offscreen: You finally got [Barr] to sort of narrow down— Quick question on exactly what you wanted to hear: Do you feel like there's a huge conflict of interest now for him moving forward in any sort of capacity?

Harris: I do, I do believe that. And I believe that what was, I mean, absolutely enlightening and should be deeply troubling to the entire American public is that he made a decision and didn't review the evidence! No prosecutor worth her salt would make a decision about whether the President of the United States was involved of an obstruction of justice without reviewing the evidence. This Attorney General lacks all credibility and has, I think, compromised the American public's ability to believe that he is a purveyor of justice.

Male reporter, offscreen: Should he resign.

Harris: Yes. [walks away]
Harris is referring to the exchange in which she straightforwardly asked Barr if he reviewed all the evidence before deciding to clear Trump of possible obstruction of justice charges and he admits that he did not.

Barr also admitted, under questioning from Senator Dick Durbin, "that he had already been working on decision saying Trump did not commit obstruction — before receiving the Mueller report or having anyone look at it."

Barr was, in sum, a total disgrace, managing to undercut even my rock bottom expectations.

But all of the Democratic Senators running for president who are on the committee — Kamala Harris, Amy Klobuchar, and Cory Booker — did an outstanding job nailing Barr's ass to the wall.

Harris and Klobuchar were particularly great, which is the value of having prosecutors on your senate committee. (And, as Joy Reid noted, they were both demonstrating "what having a prosecutor on stage debating Trump would look like.")

Here is Klobuchar, backing Barr into a corner where he is unable to answer the simplest question about whether Donald Trump's actions, as detailed by Special Counsel Robert Mueller, meet the Constitutional requirement that the president uphold the law:

Barr: ...as have other officeholders.

Klobuchar: Okay, last question: Are the president's actions detailed in this report consistent with his oath of office and the requirement in the Constitution that he take care that the laws be faithfully executed?

Barr: Is what consistent with that?

Klobuchar: I said: Are the president's actions detailed in the report consistent with his oath of office and the requirement in the Constitution that he take care that the laws be faithfully executed?

Barr: Uh, well, the, the evidence in, in the report is conflicting and, and there's different evidence, and they, they don't, they don't come to a determination as to, uh, how they're coming down on it.

Klobuchar: And so you made that decision.

Barr: Yes. And, and as, as, yeah, if it's, if—

Lindsey Graham: All right, we got two minutes left.

Klobuchar: Okay.
In other words, the answer is no. Donald Trump's actions have not been consistent with his oath of office. We didn't need the Attorney General to confirm that, but there it is.

Perhaps because nothing about this shitshow has the ability to surprise me anymore, the thought that I couldn't shake watching the proceedings was this:


The problem is not just that Trump himself is surrounded by unethical, sadistic, civically disloyal sycophants who abet his behavior, but that each of them is surrounded by their own gang of unethical, sadistic, civically disloyal sycophants who abet their behavior in turn.

It's a toxic bubble which decency cannot penetrate. And it's going to consign us all to a terrible fate, unless we can find a way to pop it. Fast.

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 533

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures (plus the occasional non-Republican who obliges us to resist their nonsense, too, like we don't have enough to worry about) is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Earlier today by me: Trump Launches Racist, Sexist Attacks on Maxine Waters and Elizabeth Warren and Trump's War on Immigrants Continues Apace.

Here are some more things in the news today...


Kia Morgan-Smith at the Grio: Therese Patricia Okoumou Speaks Out After Arrest for Climbing Statue of Liberty to Protest Trump Immigration Policy.
Therese Patricia Okoumou, the soul sister who defiantly sat at the base of Lady Liberty to protest of Trump's inhumane immigration policies, spoke out for the first time and credited our Forever First Lady Michelle Obama as the inspiration for her Statue of Liberty sit-in.

"Michelle Obama … said when they go low, we go high. And I went as high as I could," Okoumou said.

The heroic Black woman, who is an immigrant herself, rose up in resistance and climbed the Statue of Liberty on the Fourth of July. The 44-year-year old was arrested and charged with trespassing, interference with government agency functions, and disorderly conduct, reports ABC7.

When she emerged from the court, crowds awaited her and cheered for Okoumou.

"Trump has ripped this country apart. It is depressing. It is outrageous," she said at a Thursday press conference. "His draconian zero-tolerance policy on immigration has to go."

...Okoumou is expected back in court August 3 for a status conference. She faces a maximum penalty of six months in prison and a fine.
I sincerely hope that she is not obliged to spend a single day in prison for calling attention to human rights abuses being committed by this administration, while they continue to live high on the taxpayer hog with no accountability in sight.

Speaking of no accountability, this thread by Democratic Senator from Illinois Dick Durbin about the incoming head of the DOJ Criminal Division is something.


And there's more where that came from.

Ana Swanson at the New York Times: Trump's Trade War Against China Is Officially Underway. "A trade war between the world's two largest economies officially began on Friday morning as the Trump administration followed through with its threat to impose tariffs on $34 billion worth of Chinese products, a significant escalation of a fight that could hurt companies and consumers in both the United States and China. ...The escalation of the trade war from threat to reality is expected to ripple through global supply chains, raise costs for businesses and consumers, and roil global stock markets, which have been volatile in anticipation of a prolonged trade fight between the United States and almost everyone else."

Lily Kuo at the Guardian: China Retaliates with Tariffs After U.S. Begins Trade War. "Minutes after the U.S. tariffs went into effect at 12.01am on Friday U.S. time, a spokesperson for China's ministry of commerce said, 'China promised not to fire the first shot, but in order to safeguard the country's core interests as well as that of the people, it is forced to fight back,' according to Xinhua. ...'If what the U.S. wants is to escalate a trade war with China, then so be it. A little fighting may be the only way the Trump administration clears its mind and allows everyone to sober up,' the state-run Global Times said on Friday. 'The Trump administration is behaving like a gang of hoodlums with its shakedown of other countries, particularly China,' said an English-language article in the China Daily. On Thursday, a spokesperson for China's ministry of commerce said the U.S. will be 'opening fire on the whole world and also opening fire on itself.'"

Karoun Demirjian at the Washington Post: Republicans on Russia Trip Face Scorn and Ridicule from Critics at Home.
Republican lawmakers who went to Russia seeking a thaw in relations received an icy reception from Democrats and Kremlin watchers for spending the Fourth of July in a country that interfered in the U.S. presidential election and continues to deny it.

..."Russians wooing with a shopworn song — repugnant as nails on a blackboard," Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) wrote in a Twitter post in response to the delegation's trip. "They are enemies and adversaries, attacking us."

Sen. Richard C. Shelby (R-Ala.) led the eight-member delegation on a multi-day tour of St. Petersburg and Moscow... Joining Shelby were Sens. Steve Daines (R-Mont.), John Hoeven (R-N.D.), Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), John Kennedy (R-La.), Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), John Thune (R-S.D.), and Rep. Kay Granger (R-Tex.).

Members of the delegation set off on their trip late last week promising to be tough with Russian officials ahead of the president's visit, especially on matters of election interference. But they struck a conciliatory tone once there: The point of their visit, Shelby stressed to the Duma leader, was to "strive for a better relationship" with Moscow, not "accuse Russia of this or that or so forth."
Fucking disloyal cowards.

[Content Note: Nativism; child abuse] Jonathan Blitzer at the New Yorker: Parents Are Struggling to Reclaim Their Children from the Office of Refugee Resettlement. "A few days ago, [a Honduran woman named Rosalinda Hernández] learned that it will be several more weeks, at least, before the government can return her [9-year-old son, with whom she'd crossed the border seeking asylum]. In order to regain custody of their children, immigrants like Hernández need to collect documents that prove their fitness as parents and submit their fingerprints — and the fingerprinting alone takes about twenty days to process."

[CN: Nativism; child abuse; rape culture] Rebekah Entralgo and Joshua Eaton at ThinkProgress: Man with History of Sex Crimes Working at Kansas Shelter for Unaccompanied Migrant Children. "A man with a history of serious sex crimes allegations is working at a shelter for unaccompanied immigrant children in Topeka, Kansas, according to public records reviewed by ThinkProgress. ...Alarmed by the 2014 news report, [Myra Gillum, a former case manager at the shelter] sent an email to the Department Health and Human Services, the Department of Homeland Security, and other federal agencies on Aug. 16, 2017, to let them know about his troubling past." And yet he is still working there.

[CN: White supremacy; death; anti-Black slur at link] Breanna Edwards at the Root: White Driver Who Fatally Struck Black Man, Called Him Racial Slur After Death, Cleared of All Fault in Collision. "A white driver who struck and killed a black Louisiana motorist who stopped to pick up debris off the roadway has been cleared of all wrongdoing in the fatal collision, state police said in a news release. This is despite the callousness that 18-year-old Matthew M. Martin allegedly showed after the crash, sending Snapchat messages after hitting and killing 31-year-old Sherell L. Lewis Jr. 'Y'all i just hit a whole guy on the highway,' one message, showing a red vehicle, read." Rage seethe boil.

[CN: White supremacy; anti-Blackness] Kristine Phillips at the Washington Post: A Black Lawmaker Was Canvassing Door to Door in Her District; a Constituent Called 911. "State Rep. Janelle Bynum, an Oregon Democrat, was talking to constituents, typing notes on her cellphone as she knocked on doors in her district just outside Portland. Then a sheriff's deputy pulled up. Bynum — who is black — said a resident in the Clackamas County neighborhood where she was canvassing had called the police on Tuesday, thinking she was 'suspicious' because she was going door to door and 'spending a lot of time typing on her cellphone after each house.'" FOR FUCK'S SAKE.

[CN: White supremacy; anti-Blackness] Sarah Newell and John Hinton at the Winston-Salem Journal: Man Accused of Racism No Longer Employed by Sonoco After Incident at Community Pool in Winston-Salem. "Winston-Salem police were called to a private community pool Wednesday afternoon after a white man asked a black woman to show her ID. ...About 2 p.m. Wednesday, Bloom asked a black woman, who was in the pool area, for identification, Gulkham said. ...In the video posted to Facebook, Bloom can be seen talking to the woman and police officers outside of the gate. The woman tells the two officers that Bloom asked for her address, then asked to see her ID. 'Where does it say that I have to show an ID to use my own pool,' the woman says." What a brave patriot, making sure no interloping babies get to use a pool during a heatwave. Fucking shitwheel.

[CN: Sexual harassment and assault; rape culture] Joshua Eaton at ThinkProgress: Leaked Notes Reveal Buddhist Leader Coerced Female Students into Sex. "A senior official in the Buddhist group Shambhala International admitted Monday that its head, prominent Buddhist teacher and author Sakyong Mipham, had coercive sexual relationships with his female students, according to meeting notes obtained by ThinkProgress. The notes come from a private video call Monday between ground-level Shambhala leaders and its governing body, called the Kalapa Council. They reveal a crisis of leadership, with members calling for Mipham, the council, or both to step down in the wake of a sex scandal that has rocked the organization. ...Last week, the advocacy group Buddhist Project Sunshine published a report detailing allegations of coercive relationships and sexual assault by Mipham — including a second-hand allegation that a woman in Chile accused him of rape."

[CN: Sexual harassment; hostility to consent]


[CN: Sexual assault; racism] Brian Slodysko at the AP: Indiana Governor, Legislative Leaders Call for AG to Resign. "Indiana Gov. Eric Holcomb and the two GOP Statehouse leaders on Thursday called for Republican Attorney General Curtis Hill to resign amid what they called credible claims that Hill drunkenly groped four women, including a lawmaker, at an Indianapolis bar. 'Four women had the courage to step forward to report sexual harassment by the Indiana attorney general,' the Republican governor said in a statement on Thursday night. 'The findings of the recent legislative report are disturbing and, at a minimum, show a violation of the state's zero tolerance sexual harassment policy.'" If it seems unusual that Indiana Republicans would so quickly disavow one of their own for sex abuse, let me assure you that it is and inform you that Curtis Hill is Black.

[CN: Sexual assault] Corky Siemaszko at NBC News: More Ohio State Wrestlers Say Rep. Jim Jordan Knew About Sexual Abuse When He Was Coach. "One of the wrestlers, Shawn Dailey, said he was groped half a dozen times by Dr. Richard Strauss in the mid-1990s, when Jordan was the assistant wrestling coach. Dailey said he was too embarrassed to report the abuse directly to Jordan at the time, but he said Jordan took part in conversations where Strauss' abuse of many other team members came up. 'I participated with Jimmy and the other wrestlers in locker-room talk about Strauss. We all did,' Dailey, 43, told NBC News, referring to Jordan. ...Dailey corroborated the account of one of those wrestlers, Dunyasha Yetts, who told NBC News that Yetts had protested to Jordan and head coach Russ Hellickson after Strauss tried to pull down his wrestling shorts when Yetts went to see him for a thumb injury."

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

Cambridge Analytica Stirred the (Supposedly Non-Existent) Bigotries of White America

It is March 2018 and the political class continues to be outraged that Hillary Clinton is not, in their esteemed opinions, being kind enough to the people who support Donald Trump.

Indeed, the media's fixation on this topic seems to be our post-2016-election dystopian version of "her emails," as even the slightest real or perceived critique Clinton renders of Trump voters is amplified as a human rights violations of the first order inflicted upon this vulnerable, protected class of citizen.

Aaron Blake at The Washington Post, for instance, wrote an entire "analysis" of Clinton's recent commentary about how Trump's message looked backwards and stirred old bigotries, observations which, by the way, are demonstrably accurate given that this messaging was a literal part of Trump's campaign slogan which, by way of reminder, was Make America Great Again. Nonetheless, Blake calls Clinton's comments "incendiary," and if you're wondering how charitable the analysis as a whole is, it includes an embedded video titled, "Bitter Hillary Clinton Trashes America's Heartland," which should clue you in.

Christian Snyder, in an op-ed piece, snarked, "Since the 2016 campaign ended, Hillary Clinton has demonstrated herself to be a singularly extraordinary former presidential candidate — 'extraordinary' only in the sense that no ex-candidate has ever been worse." The gist of it is that Clinton doesn't coddle Trump voters, which is very mean and snobbish.

Democratic Senator Dick Durbin even joined in, stating, "My friend Hillary Clinton is wrong. Thirty percent of the people that voted for Donald Trump had voted for President Obama." (Which, in addition to being a strange, voting version of the "I have a black friend so I can't be a bigot" defense, echoes Bernie Sanders' ongoing claim that Trump supporters are not bigots.)

So, what I find utterly amazing is how if we were to believe folks like these, bigots in America are few and far between, and yet we now know that Cambridge Analytica was able to precisely micro-target the bigotries of white Americans with the aim of swaying US elections.

Via The Washington Post, from an article published two days ago (emphasis added):

The data and analyses that Cambridge Analytica generated in [2014] provided discoveries that would later form the emotionally charged core of Trump's presidential platform, said [data scientist Chris] Wylie, whose disclosures in news reports over the past several days have rocked both his onetime employer and Facebook.

"Trump wasn't in our consciousness at that moment; this was well before he became a thing," Wylie said. "He wasn't a client or anything."

The year before Trump announced his presidential bid, the data firm already had found a high level of alienation among young, white Americans with a conservative bent.

In focus groups arranged to test messages for the 2014 midterms, these voters responded to calls for building a new wall to block the entry of illegal immigrants, to reforms intended to 'drain the swamp' of Washington's entrenched political community, and to thinly veiled forms of racism toward African Americans called "race realism," he recounted.
I recognize it as a political reality that any defense of Hillary Clinton will, no matter how rational, be rejected on its face by a segment of the population. So, let's put that aside for a bigger picture.

What is critical to understand is that the notion that Trump supporters are largely not bigots is a political fiction that is primarily perpetuated by influential white men in the media and political establishment as a perverse form of political correctness.

It is a political fiction because the data suggests that, actually, "racial attitudes towards blacks and immigration are the key factors associated with support for Trump." And, via The Washington Post:
[W]hite millennial Trump voters were likely to believe in something we call "white vulnerability" — the perception that whites, through no fault of their own, are losing ground to other groups. Second, racial resentment was the primary driver of white vulnerability — even when accounting for income, education level, or employment.
This political fiction of non-existent bigotry of white America fits squarely within the mainstream narrative of American Exceptionalism that has barely even begun to reckon with its historical treatment of non-white, non-male people both within and outside of its borders.

This political fiction is, like misogyny, a national vulnerability. It is one that certain data scientists, foreign agents, and a handful of writers seem to understand far better than some of the most prominent members of the political class, including multiple Democratic politicians who, in typical fashion, internalize and overreact to the views of other prominent white men (and their attendant biases) as they rush to to their respective fainting couches about the prospect of bigotry existing in white people.

Unfortunately, though, a political class that is more outraged by a private citizen accurately naming bigotry than the fact that significantly large numbers of Americans hold bigoted views, and can have these views stoked and stirred and played by an unqualified authoritarian predator, is a political class that does not adequately grasp a very important issue at hand.

And that issue is this: While Donald Trump ran a campaign against the "political correctness" that was purportedly making our nation unsafe from external threats, it very well could be the political class's unwillingness to acknowledge white America's bigotry that plays a key role in the subversion of our political system.

After all, how do we defend against a vulnerability if we can't even admit that it's real?

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 358

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures (plus the occasional non-Republican who obliges us to resist their nonsense, too, like we don't have enough to worry about) is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Here are some things in the news today:

Earlier today by me: Here Is a Thing That Is Still Happening and Donald Trump Is a Racist.

[Content Note: Racism] Because Donald Trump is not only a racist but a liar, of course he took to Twitter to deny having called Haiti, El Salvador, et. al. "shithole countries."


Unfortunately for Trump, Democratic Senator Dick Durbin, who isn't known as a compulsive liar, disputed the president's denial in a very straightforward and powerful way:

As Senator [Lindsey] Graham made his presentation, the president interrupted him several times with questions, and, in the course of his comments, said things which were hate-filled, vile, and racist.

I use those words advisedly. I understand how powerful they are. But I cannot believe that, in the history of the White House and that Oval Office, any president has ever spoken the words that I personally heard our president speak yesterday.

You've seen the comments in the press; I've not read one of them that's inaccurate. To no surprise, the president started tweeting this morning, denying that he used those words. It is not true. He said these hateful things, and he said them repeatedly.
Wow. Thank you, Senator Durbin.

In other news, Trump has cancelled a visit to London next month to open the new U.S. embassy, fearing mass protests. But he's too much of a coward to admit that he's afraid for the world to see how hated he is, and he won't admit that his trip has been downgraded by the UK because of his bigotry, so he claimed it was because President Obama made a "bad deal" selling the previous embassy.


Couple of problems with that:


Worst. President. Ever.

EVER.

* * *

Ashley Feinberg at the Huffington Post: Here Is a Draft of Trump's Nuclear Review: He Wants a Lot More Nukes.
In October, NBC reported that [Donald] Trump had told a gathering of high-ranking national security leaders that "he wanted what amounted to a nearly tenfold increase in the U.S. nuclear arsenal." While the report doesn't nearly go that far, it does call for the development of new, so-called low-yield nuclear weapons — warheads with a lower explosive force.

The logic of those pushing for the development of smaller nukes is that our current nuclear weapons are too big and too deadly to ever use; we are effectively self-deterred, and the world knows it. To make sure other countries believe that we'd actually use nuclear force, the thinking goes, we need more low-yield nukes.

..."Making the case that we need more low-yield options is making the case that this president needs more nuclear capabilities at his disposal," said Alexandra Bell, a former senior adviser at the State Department and current senior policy director at the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation, "regardless of the fact that we have 4,000 nuclear weapons in our active stockpile, which is more than enough to destroy the world many times over. So I don't think it makes a convincing case that we somehow lack capabilities. And, in fact, I don't think you can make the case that this president needs any more capabilities."
Not only do we have 4,000 nukes in our active stockpile, but, Feinberg notes, "we already have over 1,000 nuclear warheads in our arsenal with low-yield options, to say nothing of the fact that the more nuclear weapons you introduce into the world, the more likely it is that they'll one day be used."

Especially when the sitting president is someone who [CN: video may autoplay] doesn't understand why we even have nuclear weapons if we don't he doesn't get to use them.

Meanwhile...


But Trump is busily accusing members of the U.S. intelligence community of treason. Matt Shuham at TPM: Trump Tells WSJ That FBI Employees' Critical Texts Were Treasonous. "Donald Trump said Thursday that text messages critical of him shared by FBI employees amounted to treason, the Wall Street Journal reported. Journal reporters interviewed Trump for 45 minutes, the paper reported, in a conversation that touched on everything from North Korea to Steve Bannon. 'A man is tweeting to his lover that if [Democrat Hillary Clinton] loses, we'll essentially do the insurance policy,' Trump said. 'We'll go to phase two and we'll get this guy out of office. This is the FBI we're talking about — that is treason,' he added. 'That is a treasonous act. What he tweeted to his lover is a treasonous act.' Trump was referring to text messages between Agent Peter Strzok — once a member of special counsel Robert Mueller's team — and FBI lawyer Lisa Page, who worked briefly on Mueller's team as well." That is not treason. FYI.

Foreign Staff at the Telegraph: U.S. Ambassador to Panama Resigns, Saying He Can No Longer Serve Under Trump Administration. "U.S. Ambassador to Panama John Feeley, a career diplomat and former Marine Corps helicopter pilot, has resigned, telling the State Department he no longer feels able to serve [Donald] Trump. 'As a junior foreign service officer, I signed an oath to serve faithfully the president and his administration in an apolitical fashion, even when I might not agree with certain policies. My instructors made clear that if I believed I could not do that, I would be honor bound to resign. That time has come,' Mr Feeley said, according to an excerpt of his resignation letter read to Reuters."

James Hohmann at the Washington Post: Trump Has No Nominees for 245 Important Jobs, Including an Ambassador to South Korea. (Emphasis original.)
Next Saturday brings the anniversary of the inauguration. Over the first year, a fixation on the chaos and churn inside the West Wing has often overshadowed the less-sexy decay and neglect at the departmental level. There are a striking number of big jobs that have not been filled.

The Washington Post and the Partnership for Public Service, a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization, have been working together to track the status of 626 top jobs in the executive branch. This includes assistant secretaries, chief financial officers, general counsels, heads of agencies, ambassadors, and other leadership positions that experts believe are critical for the federal government to function effectively. These represent about half of the roughly 1,200 positions that require Senate confirmation.

The White House likes to blame Congress for dragging its feet, but that's only part of the story: As of this morning, there is no pending nominee for 245 of the 626 jobs we're tracking. Among them: Deputy secretary at Treasury and Commerce, director of the Census, director of ATF, director of the Office on Violence Against Women at Justice, and commissioner of the Social Security Administration.

At Veterans Affairs, no one has been tapped to be the undersecretary for health or benefits.

At the Transportation Department, there is not a nominee to be administrator of the Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration, or National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Trump has not submitted nominees to direct the National Park Service, Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, or the U.S. Geological Survey. He has also not picked someone to be assistant secretary of Interior for fish, wildlife, and parks.

Many of these jobs have "acting" directors, but these people aren't fully empowered and cannot indefinitely stay in these roles without being confirmed by the Senate because of laws related to vacancies. The lack of permanence creates uncertainty and makes strategic planning difficult. It also makes it harder to manage career staff, who are less likely to follow orders they disagree with when they realize that their boss is a short-timer.
Fucking hell. All of these vacancies are alarming, but the fact that there is a vacancy for the Director of the Office on Violence Against Women at Justice is chilling.

* * *

[CN: Rape apologia] "Andrew Sullivan writes that it's time to resist the excesses of #MeToo." Oh.


[CN: Sexual harassment and vengeance]


[CN: Fat hatred] Kaiser at Celebitchy: Megyn Kelly: Some Women Want to Be Fat-Shamed Because Fat-Shaming 'Works'. "Megyn was doing a segment on her Today hour about 'Fit Mom' Maria Kang, the woman who posted a photo of her fit body with the caption 'what's your excuse?' As Megyn and Maria spoke, Megyn talked about how she kept weight off when she was in law school. Megyn said: 'Some of us want to be shamed! When I was in law school, I was gaining weight, I said to my stepfather, 'If you see me going into that kitchen one more time, you say, 'Where you going, fat ass?' And it works!'" Fuck. Off.

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

I Would Like to High Five Senator Dick Durbin

Because YES:

Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) asked Republicans to stop reading Ayn Rand books and help Democrats pass legislation aimed to give struggling Americans a hand.

"I say to my conservative friends, put down those Ayn Rand books for a minute and take a look at the real world," Durbin said on the Senate floor Wednesday. "If we can't stand behind those who are struggling in life, who are we; what are we?"

Durbin was marking the 50th anniversary of President Lyndon Johnson's war on poverty speech.
PUT DOWN THOSE AYN RAND BOOKS! LOL! Awesome.

Unfortunately, it's hilarious because it's true. There is perhaps no one more reluctant to take a look at the real world than a modern conservative politician. The real world is just a thing that gets in the way of creating their own reality.

Open Wide...

Quote of the Day

"When you talk about raising the Medicare eligibility age, there's one key question—what happens to that early retiree? What about that gap in coverage between their workplace and Medicare? How will they be covered? Now I listen to Republicans say we can't wait to repeal Obamacare and the insurance exchanges. Well, where does a person turn if they're 65 years of age and the Medicare eligibility age is 67? They have two years there where they may not have the best of health. They need to have accessible, affordable medical insurance during that period."Democratic Senator Dick Durbin, on Meet the Press this weekend, after reports that the White House was considering, as part of the "fiscal cliff negotiations," raising the Medicare eligibility age from 65 to 67 in exchange for a modest tax hike.

It's important for Durbin (and Pelosi, et. al.) to keep publicly reiterating what a terrible idea this is and putting pressure on the administration not to make this concession.

Krugman, in typical style, lays it out plainly (emphases mine):

I'm going to cross my fingers and hope that this is just a case of creeping Broderism, that it's a VSP fantasy about how we're going to resolve this in a bipartisan way. Because if Obama really does make this deal, there will be hell to pay.

First, raising the Medicare age is terrible policy. It would be terrible policy even if the Affordable Care Act were going to be there in full force for 65 and 66 year olds, because it would cost the public $2 for every dollar in federal funds saved. And in case you haven't noticed, Republican governors are still fighting the ACA tooth and nail; if they block the Medicaid expansion, as some will, lower-income seniors will just be pitched into the abyss.

Second, why on earth would Obama be selling Medicare away to raise top tax rates when he gets a big rate rise on January 1 just by doing nothing? And no, vague promises about closing loopholes won’t do it: a rate rise is the real deal, no questions, and should not be traded away for who knows what.

...And if it does happen, the disillusionment on the Democratic side would be huge. All that effort to reelect Obama, and the first thing he does is give away two years of Medicare? How's that going to play in future attempts to get out the vote?

If anyone in the White House is seriously thinking along these lines, please stop it right now.
Yeah.

Open Wide...