Showing posts with label Affordable Care Act. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Affordable Care Act. Show all posts

We Resist: Day 902

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures (plus the occasional non-Republican who obliges us to resist their nonsense, too, like we don't have enough to worry about) is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Earlier today by me: Migrant Children Allege Sexual Abuse and Retaliation and Primarily Speaking.

Let's start out with some GOOD news today!

[Content Note: Video may autoplay at link] Jenna Amatulli at the Huffington Post: Women's World Cup Soccer Champs Praised at NYC Parade with Glorious Signs. "The United States Women's National Team was honored in New York City with a parade on Wednesday after they brought home the 2019 Women's World Cup — and the signs did not disappoint." There is a great collection of the signs that greeted Donald Trump's least favorite professional sports team, but this one is defo my favorite:


So, yesterday, Amy McGrath announced that she is challenging Mitch McConnell for his senate seat, and then this happened... Kasie Hunt at NBC News: McGrath Raises a Record $2.5 Million on First Day of Senate Campaign. "Kentucky Democratic Senate candidate Amy McGrath raised more than $2.5 million in the first 24 hours of her campaign against Mitch McConnell — over $1 million of it coming in just the first five and a half hours after she announced, according to her campaign. McGrath campaign manager Mark Nickolas said it's the most ever raised in the first 24 hours of a Senate campaign." RIGHT FUCKING ON.

Jamie Ross at the Daily Beast: California Becomes First State to Give Health Care to Some Undocumented Migrants. "California has become the first state to offer taxpayer-supported health care to some undocumented migrants after Gov. Gavin Newsom signed the bill into law Tuesday. The new laws...will allow around 90,000 low-income adults below the age of 25 to access the state's Medicaid program, even if they're undocumented. ...Newsom said he plans to further expand coverage to more adults in the years to come." Woot!

* * *

Ann E. Marimow and Jonathan O'Connell at the Washington Post: Appeals Court Dismisses Emoluments Lawsuit Involving [Donald] Trump's D.C. Hotel.
A federal appeals court Wednesday sided with [Donald] Trump, dismissing a lawsuit claiming the president is illegally profiting from foreign and state government visitors at his luxury hotel in downtown Washington.

The unanimous ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit is a victory for the president in a novel case brought by the attorneys general of Maryland and the District of Columbia involving anti-corruption provisions in the emoluments clauses of the U.S. Constitution.

In its ruling, the three-judge panel said the attorneys general lacked legal standing to bring the lawsuit alleging the president is violating the Constitution when his business accepts payments from state and foreign governments.
Crap.

[CN: Rape culture]


Nicole Lafond at TPM: DOJ Instructs Two Mueller Deputies Not to Appear for Closed-Door Testimony. "House Democrats are attempting to make arrangements for two of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's deputies to appear for a private, closed-door testimony on the same day that Mueller is set to testify — July 17. But the Justice Department has reportedly instructed the two special counsel staffers, James Quarles and Aaron Zebley, not to appear. According to new reports in the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal, the DOJ's interference could muddy the deal that the department and lawmakers reached last month to get Mueller's testimony." Muddy the deal. That's polite.

Peter Jamison at the Washington Post: Trump's July Fourth Event and Weekend Protests Bankrupted D.C. Security Fund, Mayor Says. "Trump's overhauled July Fourth celebration cost the D.C. government $1.7 million, an amount that — combined with police expenses for demonstrations through the weekend — has bankrupted a special fund used to protect the nation's capital from terrorist threats and provide security at events such as rallies and state funerals. In a letter to the president Tuesday, D.C. Mayor Muriel E. Bowser (D) warned that the fund has now been depleted and is estimated to be running a $6 million deficit by Sept. 30. The mayor also noted that the account was never reimbursed for $7.3 million in expenses from Trump's 2017 inauguration." Fucking grifter.

Ally Boguhn at Rewire.News: Trump's Human Rights Commission Could Undercut Human Rights.
The Trump administration launched an advisory commission this week tasked with examining human rights in foreign policy — but advocates worry it could undermine global reproductive rights.

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on Monday announced the creation of the U.S. State Department's Commission on Unalienable Rights. He said the commission will conduct "an informed review of the role of human rights in American foreign policy" and provide him "with advice on human rights." A notice published in the Federal Register in May said the commission will provide "fresh thinking about human rights discourse where such discourse has departed from our nation's founding principles of natural law and natural rights."

Though the State Department has an office devoted to human rights, the commission was "conceived with almost no input from" it, Politico reported. Officials told the outlet that the commission is "advisory and will not create policy, and maintain that everyone has 'unalienable rights,' including LGBTQ people and other minorities."

Mary Ann Glendon, a professor of law at Harvard University who teaches on human rights, will chair the commission. Glendon's anti-choice activism earned her the "Proudly Pro-Life Award" from National Right to Life in 2009. That year, Glendon turned down a medal from the University of Notre Dame, citing its decision to give President Barack Obama an honorary degree.
Fucking hell.

[CN: Video may autoplay at link; ableist language at link] Jonathan Cohn at the Huffington Post: Obamacare Had Another Bad Day in Court; That's Pretty Alarming. "[T]he mere possibility that the two Republicans would invalidate part, let alone all, of the Affordable Care Act is hard to fathom. The consequences of such a ruling would be devastating, and the underlying argument of the lawsuit is, according to a wide array of respectable legal experts, positively [absurd]. And yet, here we are."

Rishika Dugyala at Politico: Pence Aide Still Refuses to Reveal Why Trip Was Mysteriously Scrapped. "The mystery surrounding Vice President Mike Pence's scrapped trip to New Hampshire last week is still alive, with his chief of staff telling reporters Wednesday morning that he can't yet offer up an explanation. 'I can't talk about that,' Pence chief of staff Marc Short told reporters on the White House driveway. He said the public could expect an answer 'in a few weeks.'" What horseshit. [Background.]

[CN: Nativism] Josh Israel at ThinkProgress: GOP Congressman Claims without Proof That 80% to 90% of Asylum Claims Aren't Legit. "Texas Rep. Michael Cloud (R) falsely stated that few asylum seekers have legitimate claims of political persecution, and that their cases should therefore merit only a very brief evaluation lasting 30 minutes to two hours maximum. The House Freedom Caucus member combined debunked statistics and a misunderstanding of what makes people eligible for asylum in a Fox News interview." These fucking lying assholes.

* * *


Maxwell Tani at the Daily Beast: CNN Tells Digital Staff: Take Some Cues from Fox News. "Fox News is already beating CNN on TV. Now, to ensure the conservative news network doesn't start winning online, CNN wants to make sure its employees know what stories Fox News is writing about. In recent months, CNN's newly revamped audience development team has begun highlighting the top daily stories people are searching for online in a widely seen company Slack messaging channel. The network has begun placing small fox emojis next to stories the right-leaning cable outlet covered online that CNN missed." Goddammit.

[CN: Misogyny] Larrison Campbell at Mississippi Today: Robert Foster, GOP Governor Candidate, Denies Woman Reporter Access Because of Her Gender. "In two phone calls this week, Colton Robison, Foster's campaign director, said a male colleague would need to accompany this reporter on an upcoming 15-hour campaign trip because they believed the optics of the candidate with a woman, even a working reporter, could be used in a smear campaign to insinuate an extramarital affair. 'The only reason you think that people will think I'm having a (improper) relationship with your candidate is because I am a woman,' this reporter said. Robison said the campaign simply 'can't risk it.'" Seethe.

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 901

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures (plus the occasional non-Republican who obliges us to resist their nonsense, too, like we don't have enough to worry about) is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Late yesterday and earlier today by me: Barr Says Trump Can Ignore Supreme Court; Add Citizenship Question to Census and Amy McGrath to Challenge Mitch McConnell for His Senate Seat and Primarily Speaking.

Here are some more things in the news today...

Priscilla Alvarez and Jeremy Herb at CNN: House Democrats Plan Subpoenas for Jared Kushner, Trump Officials, and Immigration Documents.
The House Judiciary Committee moved Tuesday to authorize subpoenas for two separate issues: an array of documents and testimony related to the administration's immigration policies and to former and current Trump administration officials, including the President's son-in-law Jared Kushner, as part of its probe into potential obstruction of justice.

The committee is planning a Thursday vote to authorize the subpoenas, which would ratchet up the Democrat-led panel's investigation into possible obstruction of justice and examination of the Trump administration's immigration policies. The vote would allow Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler, a Democrat from New York, to issue the subpoenas at his discretion.

The committee has previously requested numerous documents related to immigration matters from the administration, but Tuesday's notice to authorize subpoenas is an escalation of those requests. It shows the committee is broadening the investigation into [Donald] Trump as Democrats weigh whether to start an impeachment inquiry and comes ahead of former special counsel Robert Mueller's testimony before the House Judiciary and Intelligence Committees next week.
Good. Hope this matters. Don't understand why it's taking so long to make these critical decisions.

Meanwhile... Katie Benner at the New York Times: Barr Says House Subpoenaed Mueller to Create 'Public Spectacle'. "Attorney General William P. Barr accused House Democrats on Monday of subpoenaing testimony from Robert S. Mueller III to 'create some kind of public spectacle,' rather than elicit facts, pointing to Mr. Mueller's declaration that he would discuss only the facts laid out in the Russia investigation report. ...He also called the idea that Mr. Trump worked with the Kremlin to subvert the election 'bogus' and said the early stages of his review of the Russia inquiry suggested that he needed to toughen protocol for investigating political candidates."

So, just to be clear, the Attorney General of the United States just publicly accused the Democrats of theater for expecting a Special Counsel to give testimony on his findings, and then suggested he will use the Russia inquiry as justification for investigating political candidates — which naturally means Donald Trump's Democratic opponents.

We are in so much trouble.

* * *

[Content Note: Sexual violence] There is a lot about Jeffrey Epstein in the news today. I am frankly not inclined to cover this story ongoingly; it's easy enough to find updates if you are so inclined. If something notable happens, I will report it. Today, I will just recommend a piece at the Daily Beast by Vicky Ward, who tried to warn the world about Epstein 16 years ago and was silenced by her editor: Jeffrey Epstein's Sick Story Played Out for Years in Plain Sight.

* * *

Michael Isikoff at Yahoo News: The True Origins of the Seth Rich Conspiracy Theory: A Yahoo News Investigation.
In the summer of 2016, Russian intelligence agents secretly planted a fake report claiming that Democratic National Committee staffer Seth Rich was gunned down by a squad of assassins working for Hillary Clinton, giving rise to a notorious conspiracy theory that captivated conservative activists and was later promoted from inside [Donald] Trump's White House, a Yahoo News investigation has found.

Russia's foreign intelligence service, known as the SVR, first circulated a phony "bulletin" — disguised to read as a real intelligence report —about the alleged murder of the former DNC staffer on July 13, 2016, according to the U.S. federal prosecutor who was in charge of the Rich case. That was just three days after Rich, 27, was killed in what police believed was a botched robbery while walking home to his group house in the Bloomingdale neighborhood of Washington, D.C., about 30 blocks north of the Capitol.
How/why in the hell would the Kremlin even know who he was, get news of his "random" murder which police attribute to a botched robbery, and have that narrative ready to go within 3 days?

If this report of the conspiracy theory's origins are indeed accurate, that looks to me like the Russians killed him with the intent of using his death to launch their prepared narrative — which was that Hillary Clinton had him killed.

Which only underscores the likelihood that the Kremlin had him killed: Every conspiracy theory has a grain of truth, and the grain of truth to this one is that someone had him killed. Fucking gods.

* * *

[CN: Video may autoplay at link] Jonathan Cohn at the Huffington Post: Obamacare Is Going Back on Trial, with Insurance for 20 Million at Stake. "A federal appeals court is about to take up a Republican lawsuit that could wipe out the Affordable Care Act and, with it, health insurance for something like 20 million people. ...Now the case is before the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, where a panel of three judges will hear oral arguments on Tuesday. Two of the judges are Republican appointees and have ties to the conservative Federalist Society, just like the federal district judge who ruled in favor of the case in November." Goddammit.

D. Parvaz at ThinkProgress: Mike Pompeo Says 'We're Not Done' with Iran. "Speaking at the Christians United For Israel event in Washington, D.C., on Monday, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo threatened that the Trump administration is 'not done' with Iran. 'We've implemented the strongest pressure campaign in history against the Iranian regime and we are not done,' said Pompeo, adding that U.S. sanctions have deprived Iran of funds it would have used 'to destroy the state of Israel.' (Iran has never been at war with Israel.)" Everything about that is terrifying.

Ann E. Marimow at the Washington Post: Trump Cannot Block His Critics on Twitter, Federal Appeals Court Rules.
[Donald] Trump cannot block his critics from the Twitter feed he regularly uses to communicate with the public, a federal appeals court said Tuesday, in a case with implications for how elected officials nationwide interact with constituents on social media.

The decision from the New York-based appeals court upholds an earlier ruling that Trump violated the First Amendment when he blocked individual users critical of the president or his policies.

"The First Amendment does not permit a public official who utilizes a social media account for all manner of official purposes to exclude persons from an otherwise open online dialogue because they expressed views with which the official disagrees," wrote Judge Barrington D. Parker in the unanimous decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit.
Exactly right. Trump can't simultaneously use Twitter to make official announcements and engage in foreign policy and generally do most of his daily presidenting from that platform, and also claim that he's allowed to block people. Nope. Doesn't work that way, pal.

* * *

[CN: Gun violence; death]


[CN: White supremacist violence; eliminationism; death] David Williams at CNN: Police Say Man Cut Arizona Teen's Throat Because Rap Music Made Him Feel Unsafe. "Police say a man accused of fatally stabbing a 17-year-old in the throat at an Arizona convenience store told them he felt threatened because the teen had been listening to rap music. ...Witnesses told police that the man, who's been identified as Michael Paul Adams, 27, walked up behind the teen, grabbed him, and stabbed him in the neck, according to a probable cause statement obtained by CNN affiliate KPHO/KTVK. ...The witnesses told police that [the teen, Elijah Al-Amin] hadn't done or said anything to provoke the attack. One said Adams didn't say anything to the teen before stabbing him." Rage. Seethe. Boil.

I don't believe the killer was legitimately fearful (and it wouldn't justify murdering someone even if he were), but, given that's his explanation, here is some relevant reading: On Sitting with Fear.

[CN: Police brutality]


[CN: Ableism; suicidal ideation] Amanda Michelle Gomez at ThinkProgress: Chronic Nuisance Ordinances Are Forcing People with Disabilities out of Their Homes.
Emily Doe was nearly exiled from Maplewood, Missouri, because crisis hotline volunteers sent police to her home too many times within one year.

Emily, who's bipolar and suffers from anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder, called a crisis hotline because she was suicidal. Crisis volunteers sent emergency personnel to her house on three different occasions, and in one instance, she was taken to a psychiatric hospital for evaluation and treatment.

For doing what's medically recommended — that is, calling for help — Emily received a citation and summons from the City of Maplewood to attend an ordinance enforcement hearing for "generating too many calls for police services." Had the city determined her a "chronic nuisance," officials would have not only evicted Emily but revoked her occupancy permit, effectively exiling her from the community for at least six months.

"It's just so callous it's hard to believe," said Sejal Singh, co-author of a new paper titled "When Disability Is a 'Nuisance'" and published Monday in Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review.
Awful.

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 834

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures (plus the occasional non-Republican who obliges us to resist their nonsense, too, like we don't have enough to worry about) is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Late yesterday and earlier today by me: This Is Extremely Bad News and Primarily Speaking.

Here are some more things in the news today...

Eric Beech and David Alexander at Reuters: Trump Says He's Not Inclined to Let Former Counsel McGahn Testify to Congress. "Donald Trump said on Thursday he did not believe he would allow former White House counsel Don McGahn to testify to committees in Congress, saying McGahn had already spoken to the special counsel on the Russia probe. ...'I've had him testifying already for 30 hours,' Trump said, referring to McGahn's testimony to Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team. Trump said allowing McGahn to testify would open the gates for others to be called."

This is just the President of the United States openly admitting that he is obstructing justice, and no one who objects can do a fucking thing about it, because his party retains the majority in the Senate and is eager to abet his authoritarianism.

House Democrats are doing (mostly) what they can, but they can't really do anything of consequence without Senate support.

Manu Raju and Jeremy Herb at CNN: Nadler Threatens to Hold Barr in Contempt If DOJ Doesn't Comply with New Democratic Offer on Mueller Report. "Nadler sent Barr a new letter proposing that the committee could work with the Justice Department to prioritize which investigative materials it turns over to Congress, specifically citing witness interviews and the contemporaneous notes provided by witnesses that were cited in the special counsel Robert Mueller's report. ...Nadler set a deadline of 9 a.m. ET Monday for Barr to respond and said he would move to contempt proceedings if the attorney general does not comply."

Great. Except what's doing to happen when Barr doesn't comply? Nothing. And Barr knows it and Trump knows it and we all know it.

Which is why Democrats should quit faffing around and just go straight to impeachment at this point. Calling for Barr's resignation (for example) is a waste of time. He's not going to resign. Impeach him. Let's go.

In other Barr news... Mark Joseph Stern at Slate: William Barr's Justice Department Just Filed the Most Nakedly Political Brief in the Agency's History. "On Wednesday afternoon, after Attorney General William Barr finished his truculent and mendacious testimony before the Senate, the Department of Justice filed perhaps the most embarrassing, illogical, and nakedly political brief in the history of the agency. With Barr's assent, the DOJ argued that the entire Affordable Care Act is unconstitutional because Congress zeroed out the individual mandate's penalty in 2017."


Paul Waldman at the Washington Post: Trump Is Already Set to Use the Government to Destroy the Democratic Nominee.
The 2020 election is going to be ugly in many different ways. If you thought Donald Trump ran a rancid campaign when he was trying to make it to the White House, just you wait until he's fighting to preserve his power. It has been obvious for some time that [Donald] Trump is planning to promote hatred and division, but one thing we haven't yet focused on is how he will use the resources of the federal government to make sure he wins reelection.

...[D]o you think Trump would hesitate for an instant before telling Barr to open an investigation of the Democratic nominee for president? And given everything we've seen from Barr, do you think he’d refuse that order?

Trump may already be preparing to mobilize the federal government's resources to destroy his opponent, whoever that turns out to be. The New York Times has a new piece featuring what is sometimes called an oppo drop: a news story about a politician initiated by a political rival passing damaging information to reporters. It happens all the time, and it's not necessarily illegitimate as journalism, because the information itself may be relevant and the journalist does his or her own investigation to verify what they've been told.

But in this case, the Times acknowledges the story's provenance right in the headline: "Biden Faces Conflict of Interest Questions That Are Being Promoted by Trump and Allies."

...[W]hat we have here is the president's lawyer, with the direct involvement of the president himself, pushing a foreign official to open an investigation for the obvious purpose of embarrassing a potential rival, while the president is pushing the Justice Department to act in ways that could harm that rival as well.

That should be a scandal in and of itself. And I can't say this strongly enough: This is only the beginning.
Absolutely correct. And of course much of the political press is going to assist Trump in leveraging the power of the U.S. federal government to destroy his opponent(s), under the auspices of "campaign coverage," without clear indication of the role they are playing in undermining the integrity of both U.S. elections and the very U.S. government itself.

On that note... Matt Gertz and Rob Savillo at Media Matters: Study: Major Media Outlets' Twitter Accounts Amplify False Trump Claims on Average 19 Times a Day. "Major media outlets failed to rebut [Donald] Trump's misinformation 65% of the time in their tweets about his false or misleading comments, according to a Media Matters review. That means the outlets amplified Trump's misinformation more than 400 times over the three-week period of the study — a rate of 19 per day. The data shows that news outlets are still failing to grapple with a major problem that media critics highlighted during the Trump transition: When journalists apply their traditional method of crafting headlines, tweets, and other social media posts to Trump, they end up passively spreading misinformation by uncritically repeating his falsehoods."

* * *

[Content Note: Christian Supremacy] At Rewire.News, Jessica Mason Pieklo has more on the new HHS rule (about which I wrote yesterday): Trump Administration Finalizes Health-Care Discrimination Rule. "Louise Melling, deputy legal director at the American Civil Liberties Union, said in a statement, 'Once again, this Administration shows itself to be determined to use religious liberty to harm communities it deems less worthy of equal treatment under the law. This rule threatens to prevent people from accessing critical medical care and may endanger people's lives. Religious liberty is a fundamental right, but it doesn't include the right to discriminate or harm others.'"

[CN: Nativism; death]


[CN: Nativism]

Immigration lawyer Lily S. Axelrod has an important Twitter thread on an appalling decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals:


[CN: Climate change] Jonathan Watts at the Guardian: Biodiversity Crisis Is About to Put Humanity at Risk.
The world's leading scientists will warn the planet's life-support systems are approaching a danger zone for humanity when they release the results of the most comprehensive study of life on Earth ever undertaken.

Up to one million species are at risk of annihilation, many within decades, according to a leaked draft of the global assessment report, which has been compiled over three years by the UN's leading research body on nature.

The 1,800-page study will show people living today, as well as wildlife and future generations, are at risk unless urgent action is taken to reverse the loss of plants, insects, and other creatures on which humanity depends for food, pollination, clean water, and a stable climate.

The final wording of the summary for policymakers is being finalised in Paris by a gathering of experts and government representatives before the launch on Monday, but the overall message is already clear, according to Robert Watson, the chair of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.

"There is no question we are losing biodiversity at a truly unsustainable rate that will affect human wellbeing both for current and future generations," he said. "We are in trouble if we don't act, but there are a range of actions that can be taken to protect nature and meet human goals for health and development."
Grim.

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

Primarily Speaking

image of a cartoon version of me playing a tuba with the text 'womp womp' coming out of it, while standing in front of a patriotic stars-and-stripes graphic, to which I've added text reading: 'The Democratic Primary 2020: Let's do this thing.'

Welcome to another edition of Primarily Speaking, because presidential primaries now begin fully one million years before the election!

So, Senator Bernie Sanders was on All In with Chris Hayes last night, and he flat-out said that he would not support Democratic legislation to improve the Affordable Care Act. Here is how Chris Hayes (a big Sanders fan) himself described the incredible moment in a tweet: "This Sanders answer whether he would support House Dem legislation to improve ACA is pretty interesting. He says 'no' and says he doesn't support any incremental reforms, which is quite a departure from his record. He's voted for all kinds of incremental reforms including ACA."

"Interesting" is not the word I would use to describe Sanders' answer.

Healthcare analyst Charles Gaba adds further context: "[Hayes] asked him TWICE to clarify. Bernie SPECIFICALLY said he WOULDN'T vote for the House bill if it came to a vote in the Senate...and defined 'incremental' as the 4-year ramp up of his MFA bill." (Note: MFA = Medicare for All.)

He adds: "I should also note that the *House* MFA bill only has a 2-year ramp up, so gee, I guess Bernie is an evil incrementalist himself? He also just threw the House Dems under the bus...including many who presumably support BOTH #ACA2 (short term) AND #MFA (long term)."

So, let's be really clear about what this means: Bernie Sanders said he will not vote to make improvements to the Affordable Care Act because it's his way or the highway. The only support he will give is to his "Medicare for All" proposal (despite the fact that there are real problems with that legislation, too), and, in the meantime, he will refuse to help make improvements to existing healthcare legislation.

Lest you imagine that I am mischaracterizing his position, here is what Sanders tweeted last night: "We must defend the ACA from Trump's assault and protect people's existing coverage. However, protecting the ACA will not fully solve the health care crisis. To finally guarantee health care as a right, we must take on the insurance industry and pass a Medicare for All bill."

He wants to "take on the insurance industry," which is a massive undertaking that cannot happen quickly and will upend the economy and will cost millions of people their jobs, so it is something that necessarily has to happen very slowly and carefully and with a colossal amount of careful planning, and will only vote to "protect," but not to improve, the ACA in the meantime.

This should be absolutely disqualifying for anyone with even the most basic understanding of how governing works and a baseline functional sense of decency.

* * *

By comparison, here is Senator Kamala Harris: "Tens of millions of Americans have benefited from the Affordable Care Act, including the removal of pre-existing conditions as a barrier to receive care. We have been clear, I think, as a nation that we value and we want all Americans to be able to have access to affordable health care, period. The idea that people are playing politics, yet again, with the Affordable Care Act is the height of irresponsibility." She was talking about Trump. It's scandalous that it wouldn't be unreasonable to conclude she may have been talking about someone else in the Democratic primary.

Hey, speaking of Harris, you know who likes her pay-teachers-more plan that I mentioned yesterday? Senator Amy Klobuchar!


This is what the Democratic primary could look like — a roundtable of ideas in which the candidates come together to debate differences in a meaningful way and support each other along points of agreement. I am so here for that, as much as it can happen.

Speaking of good policy, Senator Elizabeth Warren's has introduced a sweeping childcare proposal that "calls for providing licensed early childhood care for every family in the country at a cost of no more than 7 percent of that family's income. For families making up to 200 percent of the federal poverty level ($51,000 for a family of four), child care would be free. Moody's estimates 12 million children will be eligible. Warren's Universal Child Care and Early Learning Act is certain to change lots about the federal budget. It has an estimated cost of $70 billion a year — or $700 billion over a decade. That's a big number, but it does represent only one-third of 1 percent of GDP, and Warren has cited estimates that the tax on the ultra-wealthy she would implement to pay for the program would generate near-$3 trillion in revenue over a decade."

Back to healthcare for a moment: Julián Castro also had a very good response to Trump's attack on healthcare. Check out all the Democratic talking points about their successes on healthcare he manages to seamlessly deliver in a minute and a half. He's very good on TV. So polished.

In case you want to find out more about Senator Cory Booker's policies and thoughts, CNN is doing a town hall with each of the candidates, and it's Booker's turn tonight at 10pm ET. Live from South Carolina and moderated by Don Lemon.

Senator Kirsten Gillibrand continues to get mighty pushback — and deservedly so — in response to her garbage opioid bill. Many concerns that have been voiced simply have not been addressed. Dr. Ryan Marino, an emergency medical physician and medical toxicologist at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, notes that "acute pain" is not defined in the legislation, "which is going to be a big problem, because that definition itself is my biggest issue with this proposed legislation." Ana Mardoll continues to flag that Congressional control on pill dispensing might be immediately co-opted to deny birth control. And Abraham Gutman has [Content Note: self-harm] a very good thread on many of the additional problems with the approach laid out in Gillibrand's bill. What an absolute mess.

In other news, Gillibrand has released her taxes and has a petition you can sign calling for every other candidate to release their taxes, too.

I really don't know about Mayor Pete Buttigieg. He's now utilizing a mendacious talking point about how "Democrats spent too much time in 2016 talking about Trump" and claims Hillary Clinton's whole message was "don't vote for him." That is such rank bullshit. And during the same interview, he said this about infamously homophobic Chick-fil-A: "I do not approve of their politics, but I kind of approve of their chicken. So maybe if nothing else, I can build that bridge. Maybe I'll become in a position to broker that peace deal." At this point, I've come to the conclusion that Mayor Pete just isn't my style. There's a long way to go, and plenty of time for him to win me back, but I'm guessing that isn't going to happen. We're on very different pages.

John Hickenlooper is still definitely running for president.

Talk about these things! Or don't. Whatever makes you happy. Life is short.

Open Wide...

Trump Justice Department Moves to Strike Down ACA

Congressional Republicans repeatedly tried, unsuccessfully, to repeal the Affordable Care Act, so now the Trump Regime is grabbing the baton and trying to get it done through the courts they're busily stacking.

Ariane de Vogue and Tami Luhby at CNN report:

The Trump administration on Monday said the entire Affordable Care Act should be struck down, in a dramatic reversal.

In a filing with a federal appeals court, the Justice Department said it agreed with the ruling of a federal judge in Texas that invalidated the Obama-era health care law.

In a letter Monday night, the administration said "it is not urging that any portion of the district court's judgment be reversed."

"The Department of Justice has determined that the district court's comprehensive opinion came to the correct conclusion and will support it on appeal," said Kerri Kupec, spokesperson for the Justice Department.

It's a major shift for the Justice Department from when Jeff Sessions was attorney general. At the time, the administration argued that the community rating rule and the guaranteed issue requirement — protections for people with pre-existing conditions — could not be defended but the rest of the law could stand.

After the Justice Department took that position, federal District Judge Reed O'Connor struck down the entire law and the case is currently before a federal appeals court.

...Because the case is before one of the most conservative appellate courts in the country, it almost guarantees that the issue will return to the newly solidified conservative Supreme Court at some point.
During Attorney General Bill Barr's confirmation hearing, Senator Kamala Harris asked him if he was "open to reconsidering the position" of the Justice Department, and he replied, "Yes." She was actually asking if he would consider reversing the Justice Department's decision not to defend the preexisting conditions provision, but apparently he was actually answering that he would reconsider reversing the Justice Department's decision to defend all the rest of it.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi issued a statement on the Trump Regime's decision to try to destroy the ACA:
Tonight in federal court, the Trump Administration decided not only to try to destroy protections for Americans living with pre-existing conditions, but to declare all-out war on the health care of the American people.

On the very first day that the Democratic Majority held the gavel, the House of Representatives voted to intervene against Republicans' monstrous health care lawsuit to defend people with pre-existing conditions and the health care of all Americans. While the Trump Administration broadens its monstrous ambitions from destroying protections for pre-existing conditions to tearing down every last benefit and protection the Affordable Care Act provides, Democrats are fiercely defending the law of the land and protecting all Americans' health care.

Democrats will continue to fight relentlessly to protect people with pre-existing conditions and to deliver lower health costs and prescription drug prices for every American.
Democrats will reportedly roll out ambitious healthcare legislation today. They will, of course, have a nigh impossible journey to getting a healthcare bill passed, given a Republican Senate majority and a president who will refuse to sign it. But all they can do is try mightily.

And we need to get ready to make some calls.

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 697

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures (plus the occasional non-Republican who obliges us to resist their nonsense, too, like we don't have enough to worry about) is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Earlier today by me: A Letter from the Woman Who Should Be President and Senate Report Details Vast Scope of Russian Election Interference and Trump Again Threatens War on Dissidents.

Here are some more things in the news today...

Late Friday, District Judge Reed O'Connor issued an absolutely ridiculous and heinous ruling striking down the Affordable Care Act.

Jonathan H. Adler, professor of law at the Case Western Reserve University School of Law, and Abbe R. Gluck, professor of law and the faculty director of the Solomon Center for Health Law and Policy at Yale Law School, penned a scathing op-ed for the New York Times, "What the Lawless Obamacare Ruling Means," the viciously blunt subhead of which reads: "It's not based on a solid legal argument. It's an exercise in raw judicial power." An excerpt:
In a shocking legal ruling, a federal judge in Texas wiped Obamacare off the books Friday night. The decision, issued after business hours on the eve of the deadline to enroll for health insurance for 2019, focuses on the so-called individual mandate. Yet it purports to declare the entire law unconstitutional — everything from the Medicaid expansion, the ban on pre-existing conditions, Medicare and pharmaceutical reforms to much, much more.

A ruling this consequential had better be based on rock-solid legal argument. Instead, the opinion by Judge Reed O'Connor is an exercise of raw judicial power, unmoored from the relevant doctrines concerning when judges may strike down a whole law because of a single alleged legal infirmity buried within.

We were on opposing sides of the 2012 and 2015 Supreme Court challenges to the Affordable Care Act, and we have different views of the merits of the act itself. But as experts in the field of statutory law, we agree that this decision makes a mockery of the rule of law and basic principles of democracy — especially Congress's constitutional power to amend its own statutes and do so in accord with its own internal rules.

...Friday was another sad day for the rule of law — the deployment of judicial opinions employing questionable legal arguments to support a political agenda. This is not how judges are supposed to act.
I encourage you to read the whole thing. Meanwhile, over at ThinkProgress, Ian Millhiser explains one of the primary reasons that O'Connor's ruling is unlikely to stand: Alito Cut the Legs Out of the Latest Attack on Obamacare — and Didn't Even Know He Did It.
[A] passage in Justice Samuel Alito's opinion for the Court in Hobby Lobby could — or at least, should — take on an entirely unexpected significance after Reed O'Connor, a partisan operative turned federal judge, struck down the entire Affordable Care Act on Friday in a case called Texas v. United States.

Judge O'Connor's opinion is a jurisprudential trainwreck. It misreads the text of the law, draws distinctions that the Supreme Court explicitly rejected, and it feigns ignorance regarding the outcome of a year-long debate where congressional Republicans tried and failed to repeal Obamacare. O'Connor's opinion is such an embarrassment to the judiciary that even Jonathan Adler, one of the architects of the last partisan lawsuit seeking to undermine Obamacare, called the opinion "strained and implausible."

But you don't have to take my or Adler's word for it. You can also take Justice Alito's.

O'Connor's opinion, to the extent that it engages in anything that can be described as legal reasoning, rests largely on statements of fact that Congress wrote into the Affordable Care Act's text when it enacted the law in 2010. Yet Hobby Lobby rejected O'Connor's use of such fact-finding statements. Indeed, the methodology O'Connor used in his opinion is so inconsistent with the methodology Alito used in Hobby Lobby that the two opinions cannot coexist.
There is much more at the link.

The long and the short of it is that O'Connor's ruling is being almost universally received as trash by legal experts. That doesn't guarantee it won't be upheld, but it is much more likely to be overturned. Even this conservative Supreme Court isn't going to be inclined to allow a judge to use faulty reasoning to eradicate the Affordable Care Act with a stroke of his pen.

* * *

Addy Baird at ThinkProgress: As Shutdown Looms, House Republicans Decline to Show Up for Votes. "With just days left before a possible partial government shutdown, a number of retiring House Republicans have been failing to show up for votes in the weeks since the midterms, the New York Times reported Sunday. [Donald] Trump vowed last week that he would 'own' a possible government shutdown in an effort to secure funding for a wall on the country's southern border. ...[But] even if Trump ultimately agrees to a package that will avoid a shutdown, the fact that many retiring Republicans are simply not showing up for votes means GOP House leadership doesn't know if they will have the votes to pass it." Good grief.

Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke is the latest Trump official to hit the road and will leave his cabinet position by the end of the year. Good riddance to corrupt rubbish. Trump tweeted that Zinke's replacement will be announced sometime this week, and I'm sure whoever it is will be even worse than Zinke. Shiver.

Rachel Weiner, Carol D. Leonnig, and Matt Zapotosky at the Washington Post: Michael Flynn's Business Partner Charged with Illegally Lobbying for Turkey.
A former business partner of Michael Flynn has been charged with acting as an agent of a foreign government and conspiracy for his efforts to get Turkish cleric Fethullah Gulen extradited from the United States.

Bijan Kian made his first appearance in Alexandria federal court Monday morning. According to the indictment, Kian, who ran a lobbying firm with Flynn, conspired with a Turkish businessman to illegally influence government officials and public opinion in the United States against Gulen.

The indictment demonstrates the extent to which Flynn was secretly working to advance the interests of his Turkish clients while publicly serving as a key surrogate to Donald Trump and auditioning for a role in his administration. According to the newly-unsealed court document, Flynn was texting and emailing frequently about how to advance the Turkish agenda throughout the final weeks of the presidential campaign.
[Content Note: Nativism; white supremacy] Frank Dale at ThinkProgress: Stephen Miller Uses White Nationalist Dogwhistle to Push Trump's Border Wall. "White House senior adviser Stephen Miller echoed white nationalist rhetoric to advocate for [Donald] Trump's proposed border wall during a rare television appearance on Sunday. Miller told CBS' Margaret Brennan that Trump is 'absolutely' willing to shut down the government this week if he doesn't receive funding for his border wall, calling it 'a fundamental issue' that will determine 'whether or not the United States remains a sovereign country.' The term 'sovereignty' has been used as a white nationalist dogwhistle for decades." These fucking assholes, pretending to care about the nation's sovereignty while undermining it by colluding with a foreign adversary. JFC.

[CN: Nativism; Islamophobia] Erin Allday at the San Francisco Chronicle: Trump Travel Ban Keeps Yemeni Mother from Seeing Dying 2-Year-Old Son in Oakland. "Abdullah Hassan was born in Yemen with a rare brain disease that initially affected his ability to walk and talk but quickly worsened. He is no longer able to breathe on his own. His father, a U.S. citizen who lives in Stockton, brought him to UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital Oakland for care about five months ago, and Abdullah is not expected to live much longer. The parents are ready to take Abdullah off life support, but they want his mother to have one more moment to hold him. So far, the U.S. State Department has ignored their pleas for a waiver to get her into the United States, they say." I hate this fucking cruel administration with the fiery power of ten thousand suns.

[CN: Nativism; death; video may autoplay at link] Anne Flaherty and Wil Cruz at ABC News: Border Patrol Head Didn't Tell Congress About Jakelin Caal Maquin to Avoid 'Politicizing' Girl's Death. "The head of U.S. Customs and Border Protection said he did not disclose the death of a 7-year-old girl at the border during his testimony to Congress because he wasn't sure that the mother had been notified and because he didn't want to 'risk politicizing the death of a child.' ...[Kevin McAleenan], who provided a detailed timeline of the events, called Jakelin's death a 'tragedy.' He went on to defend his agents' actions." Of course he did.

* * *

[CN: Homophobia] Andy Towle at Towleroad: Cory Booker Again Addresses Sexual Orientation: 'I'm Heterosexual'. "Cory Booker addressed his sexual orientation in a profile with the Philadelphia Inquirer, which mulled the New Jersey senator's possible 2020 presidential run as a bachelor. Wrote the Inquirer: 'But there's one factor that might be unique among the two dozen or so Democrats eyeing a 2020 run: He's single. America hasn't elected an unmarried president since 1884 — and only two have ever taken office without having been married first. If he runs, Booker, 49, would try to be the third.' ...Said Booker, who has addressed his orientation multiple times in the past: 'I'm heterosexual. Every candidate should run on their authentic self, tell their truth, and more importantly, or mostly importantly, talk about their vision for the country.'"

To be clear, I'm not including this item in the We Resist thread because I find something objectionable about Booker's response, but because I find it objectionable that he was obliged to respond at all. No one should be forced to announce their sexuality, for any reason, and for fuck's sake in the year of our lord Jesus Jones two thousand and eighteen no one's sexuality should even matter. It's irrelevant to whether someone is capable of doing the job of president.

Relatedly, Democrats may have their first openly gay presidential candidate in 2020, as South Bend, Indiana, mayor Pete Buttigieg is reportedly contemplating a run.

For the record, I have nothing against Buttigieg, but I don't think he's got nearly enough experience to run for president. And he's not the only person contemplating a run about whom I feel similarly. It's certainly interesting to me how, following the defeat of the most qualified candidate ever, who happened to be a woman, the field is now rife with wildly unqualified men. Cough.

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

The Republican Party Abets Trump's Tyranny

It's frankly feels trite at this point to make the indisputable observation that Congressional Republicans have totally abandoned their duty to provide checks and balances on the executive branch of the U.S. federal government. The GOP caucus is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Trump Regime and whatever nefarious masters (corporatists, oligarchs, the Kremlin) the president and his regime serve.

And yet: This evident fact rarely makes its way into coverage of the Trump presidency.

I read all three of the following pieces this morning, about Donald Trump's various abuses of power and contempt for the law, and none of them gave even passing mention to Congress' capacity and responsibility to limit Trump's behavior:


But who's gonna stop him, though?

The only one of the three branches with any inclination to rein in Trump's seemingly boundless authoritarian urges is the judicial branch, which he is busily reshaping with loyalists as quickly as possible.

Once he neuters the judiciary, and failing a highly unlikely "blue tsunami" in free and fair elections in November, Trump will have consolidated power entirely — with zero resistance and abundant assistance from the Republican Party.

Which is horrifyingly remarkable enough in itself, but it is truly extraordinary that he is managing to do so virtually without comment in the political press.

Instead, they largely remain stuck on the dead stupid narrative that Trump is somehow an outlier of the Republican Party, rather than its grandest inevitability.

So we never get to the part of the story where Congressional Republicans are actively abetting this vile nightmare. It's just story after story about how Trump is flouting the law or ignoring the law or outright breaking the law, with no attendant commentary on how such behavior is neither normal nor a foregone conclusion.

Trump is not an act of nature. He can be stopped. His party refuses to stop him. That warrants comment.

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 505

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures (plus the occasional non-Republican who obliges us to resist their nonsense, too, like we don't have enough to worry about) is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Earlier today by me: The Collusion Is Right Out in the Open and DREAMer Manuel Antonio Cano Pacheco Killed After Deportation.

Here are some more things in the news today...

Damian Paletta, David J. Lynch, and Heather Long at the Washington Post: France's Macron Threatens Rare Rebuke of U.S. at G-7, Trump Fires Back.
French President Emmanuel Macron on Thursday threatened to join with other world leaders to issue a rare rebuke of the United States at a global summit here this weekend, drawing immediate and sharp replies from [Donald] Trump.

Macron said Trump could be excluded from joining with other leaders in a joint declaration of unity at the end of a global summit here, a very unusual move that was meant to isolate Trump's recent burst of trade threats aimed at numerous U.S. allies.

"The American President may not mind being isolated, but neither do we mind signing a 6 country agreement if need be," Macron wrote on Twitter. "Because these 6 countries represent values, they represent an economic market which has the weight of history behind it and which is now a true international force."

Trump appeared unmoved, accusing Macron and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau of hurting the United States with unfair trade practices.

"Please tell Prime Minister Trudeau and President Macron that they are charging the U.S. massive tariffs and create nonmonetary barriers. The EU trade surplus with the U.S. is $151 Billion, and Canada keeps our farmers and others out. Look forward to seeing them tomorrow," Trump wrote.

He followed it up with another tweet targeting Trudeau. "Prime Minister Trudeau is being so indignant, bringing up the relationship that the U.S. and Canada had over the many years and all sorts of other things ... but he doesn't bring up the fact that they charge us up to 300% on dairy — hurting our Farmers, killing our Agriculture!" he wrote.

Later, Trump tweeted that he would raise undisclosed tariffs against Canada and European Union countries if they don't lower theirs. "Take down your tariffs & barriers or we will more than match you!" he wrote.

The exchanges cast an immediate shadow over the summit before it even began.
To put it mildly. And as if that weren't enough, Trump is also planning to make an early exit from the G7 summit: "By pulling out early, Trump will skip sessions focused on climate change, the oceans, and clean energy. He will also miss the traditional group-photo opportunity among fellow heads of state. The president may also miss the opportunity to host a summit-ending news conference, something world leaders traditionally do."

It's honestly time for everyone, inside the U.S. and outside, to acknowledge that Trump simply isn't a world leader. He's a destructive puppet with immense power which he uses to subvert what little and precarious global stability there is. And he's a deeply fear-driven man who masks his cowardice with fatalism, which makes him unfathomably dangerous.

Susan B. Glasser at the New Yorker: Under Trump, "America First" Really Is Turning Out to Be America Alone.
Ever since Trump took office, America's allies have desperately sought to avoid this moment. Over the last year and a half, though, many of them have come to realize, with growing dread, that it was inevitable. The rift between the world's great democracies that Trump's election portended is coming to pass, and it is about far more than Iran policy, obscure trade provisions, or whether Germany spends two per cent of its G.D.P. on nato. Many senior European officials speak of it, as one Ambassador to Washington did to me recently, as nothing less than a "crisis of the West."

...Nowhere in Europe has that subconscious been more rocked than in Germany, where its close relationship with the United States has defined the country's remarkable resurrection after the Second World War. "It took Germany the longest of all partners to come to terms with someone like Trump becoming President," the senior German official told me. "We were very emotional, because our relationship with America is so emotional—it's more of a son-father relationship—and we didn't recognize our father anymore and realized he might beat us."

Only in recent weeks, he said, after Trump reorganized his foreign-policy team, replacing his Secretary of State and national-security adviser with the more like-minded Mike Pompeo and John Bolton and launching his trade war, did they finally get that "this is real. And still many people haven't come to grips with the idea that Trump is not considering us an ally and as a son but maybe even as adversary."

...A year ago, after Trump returned from his first Presidential trip overseas with deeply unsettled allies in Europe, his national-security adviser, H. R. McMaster, and his chief economic adviser, Gary Cohn, teamed up to write a reassuring op-ed in the Wall Street Journal. "America First is not America alone," they promised. Neither of the two men still works for Trump.
Sob.

* * *

Amy Goldstein at the Washington Post: Trump Administration Won't Defend ACA in Case Brought by GOP States.
The Trump administration said Thursday night that it will not defend the Affordable Care Act against the latest legal challenge to its constitutionality — a dramatic break from the executive branch's tradition of arguing to uphold existing statutes and a land mine for health insurance changes the ACA brought about.

In a brief filed in a Texas federal court and an accompanying letter to the House and Senate leaders of both parties, the Justice Department agrees in large part with the 20 Republican-led states that brought the suit. They contend that the ACA provision requiring most Americans to carry health insurance soon will no longer be constitutional and that, as a result, consumer insurance protections under the law will not be valid, either.

The three-page letter from Attorney General Jeff Sessions begins by saying that Justice adopted its position "with the approval of the President of the United States."
Jessica Mason Pieklo at Rewire.News: Congress Couldn't Kill Obamacare, But Trump Is Still Trying. "In its brief, the Justice Department argues two main points. First, it claims that the individual mandate, which the U.S. Supreme Court upheld in 2012, is unconstitutional. Second, the administration argues that because the individual mandate is unconstitutional, other key provisions of the law should be struck down on the ground that they can't be severed, or removed, from the unconstitutional mandate. The provisions the Justice Department wants the court to invalidate are central to the ACA, or Obamacare, and would gut protections for those with pre-existing conditions."

screen cap of tweet authored by me, featuring an old tweet of mine reading 'Fuck every single person who said or implied there was no difference between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton.' to which I've added new commentary reading 'G7, Affordable Care Act, and literally just every goddamned thing edition.'

* * *


Justin Glawe at the Daily Beast: John Bolton's New Top Aide Is a Russia Truther. "National Security Adviser John Bolton's top aide hire said last year that U.S. intelligence reports on Russia's election meddling were 'rigged.' That's just one of the conspiracies Fred Fleitz espoused before he was hired last week as Bolton's chief of staff. Fleitz has also said it's 'impossible' to know if Russia was responsible for election-related hacks, and speculated that the Obama administration manipulated intelligence about Russia and that it schemed to 'trap' Trump officials by sanctioning Moscow. Fleitz even said that [Donald] Trump should 'pardon everyone' under investigation in the Russia matter.


Kira Lerner at ThinkProgress: North Carolina Tries to Revive Its Discriminatory Voter ID Law as Constitutional Amendment. "Two years after federal courts struck down North Carolina's discriminatory voter ID law, Republican lawmakers are trying to revive their strict requirements by passing an amendment to the state's constitution [despite the fact that the Supreme Court said last year that the law] targeted 'African-Americans with almost surgical precision.' ...Brandi Collins-Dexter, the senior campaign director for Color of Change, noted that House Speaker Tim Moore, the lead sponsor of the new bill, and the other Republicans pushing it left the details 'intentionally vague' — the bill does not specify which forms of photo ID would be accepted under the new law. 'To us, that's even more alarming,' she told ThinkProgress."

And finally, more horrendous news from the United States' deadly war on immigrants...

[Content Note: Nativism; self-harm; death] Staff at the Daily Beast: ICE Deportee Killed Himself En Route to Native Country. "A 34-year-old Eritrean killed himself while being deported back to his home country, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement announced Friday. Zeresenay Ermias Testfatsion was being held in Egypt's Cairo International Airport when authorities found him 'deceased in a shower area.' His body was then transported to a local hospital and en route to Eritrea's capital Asmara. Testfatsion was apprehended by immigration authorities last year at the Hidalgo Texas Port of Entry when he attempted to illegally cross the southern border, and was ordered to be deported by a federal immigration judge in October."

What are we doing? Shame on this nation. Shame on us.

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

We Resist: Day 475

a black bar with the word RESIST in white text

One of the difficulties in resisting the Trump administration, the Republican Congressional majority, and Republican state legislatures (plus the occasional non-Republican who obliges us to resist their nonsense, too, like we don't have enough to worry about) is keeping on top of the sheer number of horrors, indignities, and normalization of the aggressively abnormal that they unleash every single day.

So here is a daily thread for all of us to share all the things that are going on, thus crowdsourcing a daily compendium of the onslaught of conservative erosion of our rights and our very democracy.

Stay engaged. Stay vigilant. Resist.

* * *

Earlier today by me: Stormy Daniels' Lawyer Drops a Bombshell on Donald Trump's Lawyer and Trump Continues His Attacks on the Free Press and Trump Threatens Sanctions on European Allies.

Here are some more things in the news today...

Let's start with an ACTION ITEM: Contact your senators and tell them to support the Senate vote to PRESERVE NET NEUTRALITY.


MAKE YOUR CALLS.

* * *

[Content Note: Anti-Blackness; white supremacy. Covers entire section.]

Today in Shopping While Black: Kia Morgan-Smith at the Grio: Nordstrom Under Fire after Police Called on Black Teens Falsely Accused of Shoplifting Prom Clothes. "High school students Mekhi Lee, Dirone Taylor and Eric Rogers II were reportedly shopping for prom clothes and noticed that several employees started following them around the store. 'I was nervous the whole time,' Lee recalled. 'Every time we move, they move. When we looked up, they looked up.' Feeling uneasy about the situation, the teens decided to leave the store by were immediately surrounded and confronted by Brentwood Police in the parking lot. CBS News reports that police then informed the teens they were called to the scene because the store accused them of stealing. The police investigated and found the claims to be false and released them without charges."

Today in Working While Black: Katie Jane Fernelius at Indy Week: A Duke University VP Walked into the Campus Joe Van Gogh, Heard a Rap Song, Demanded That the Employees Be Fired. "On Friday, [vice president for student affairs Larry Moneta] came in during an afternoon rush. The baristas had a habit of playing music from Spotify over the speakers, usually on playlists curated by the service. When Moneta walked in, 'Get Paid' by Young Dolph was playing. The song's titular refrain included the n-word, as Young Dolph raps, 'Get paid, young nigga.' Britni Brown, who was manning the register, was in charge of the playlist that day. When he approached the counter, Moneta, a white man, told Brown, an African-American woman, that the song was inappropriate. ...She says she shut the song off immediately. She grabbed him a vegan muffin and offered it free of charge. ...On Monday morning, Brown and [Kevin Simmons, the other barista on duty] were called into Joe Van Gogh's Hillsborough office and asked to resign."

Today in Graduating While Black: Alex Harris and Madeleine Marr at the Miami Herald: Black UF Students Were 'Manhandled' off Graduation Stage. "It's a tradition for culturally black sororities and fraternities to 'stroll' across the graduation stage and perform their Greek organization's signature dance, but that tradition was interrupted Saturday at the University of Florida by an 'aggressive' graduation marshal. Video footage showed the orange-and-blue clad marshal physically hustling the celebrating students off the graduation stage — at one point bear-hugging a male student and dragging him away. The videos have spread widely on social media, with many critics calling the actions racist. On Tuesday, the school announced the faculty member serving as a marshal has been placed on paid administrative leave 'pending a review of the appropriate administrative steps.' He was not identified."

To realize the plea inherent in the call #BlackLivesMatter, Black people's lives must matter in all spaces and at all times. The relentless double standards that mean Black people are subjected to harassment and humiliation just for fucking existing as Black human beings must end.

* * *


That said, if the actual objective is stalling for time to allow the authoritarians to consolidate power, then a year is definitely not long enough. *side-eye*

Here is a piece of good news: Carol Morello, Anna Fifield, and David Nakamura at the Washington Post: North Korea Frees 3 American Prisoners Ahead of a Planned Trump-Kim Summit. "Three American men who had been imprisoned by North Korea are on their way to the United States, [Donald] Trump announced Wednesday after they were released to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo during his visit to Pyongyang."

I'm very glad indeed for Kim Dong-chul, Tony Kim, and Kim Hak-song that they are no longer imprisoned in North Korea.

I am also very angry that Donald Trump continues to say that President Obama failed to secure freedom for the three men, when two of the men were taken into custody in 2017, after Trump had taken office.

[CN: Class warfare] Amanda Michelle Gomez at ThinkProgress: Health Insurers Say higher Obamacare Premiums Are Coming, and It's Republicans' Fault. "Health experts warned this would happen. In fact, insurers who set the premium rates cautioned that costs would rise if lawmakers continued to undermine the Obamacare exchanges and not shore up the market. A letter issued to lawmakers in November from major health industry players said '[e]liminating the individual mandate by itself likely will result in a significant increase in premiums, which would in turn substantially increase the number of uninsured Americans.' Now the public at large is learning what it meant for Congress to repeal the individual mandate, the tax penalty for not having insurance, and then not doing anything to improve a fragile market."

Speaking of Republicans being unfathomable assholes...


[CN: Misogyny; queer hatred; child abuse] Samantha Schmidt at the Washington Post: Mormon Church Breaks All Ties with Boy Scouts, Ending 100-Year Relationship. "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints said Tuesday it will sever all ties with the Boy Scouts of America, ending a century-old tradition deeply ingrained in the religious life of Mormon boys. ...Church officials did not cite specific Scouts policy changes that spurred the split, but the two groups have increasingly clashed over values in recent years, particularly after the Boy Scouts' move to include openly gay troop leaders. The announcement also came less than a week after the Boy Scouts announced it would be changing its flagship name to Scouts BSA, promoting its decision last year to welcome girls into the program for the first time."


[CN: Sexual assault and harassment] And speaking of turning an indifferent eye toward sex abuse:


Does NBC imagine that this reflects well on them? Because it doesn't.

What have you been reading that we need to resist today?

Open Wide...

Malice Is the Centerpiece of Trump's Agenda: Access to Healthcare Edition

With the constant barrage of news about Trump administration failures, many of them of deliberate design, commanding our immediate attention at seemingly every moment, the long-term consequences of that sabotage often escapes notice.

This should be a headline with sustained coverage in every newspaper and magazine, on every network news broadcast, on every cable news channel: U.S. Americans' access to healthcare is eroding again under Trump's presidency.

The Washington Post editors, under the blunt and accurate headline "Americans Are Starting to Suffer from Trump's Health-Care Sabotage" write (empahses mine):

The Commonwealth Fund, a nonprofit foundation focused on health-care issues, announced last week that the rate of working-age Americans without health insurance in the group's annual survey rose to 15.5 percent, up about three percentage points since 2016. Things are worse in the 19 holdout states, such as Virginia, that have refused to expand their Medicaid programs: The rate of uninsured working-age Americans hit 21.9 percent in those areas, up nearly six percentage points over two years. Nationally, the spike has been particularly bad at the modest end of the income scale, rising nearly five percentage points since 2016 for low-income, working-age Americans.

Obamacare critics regularly describe all problems as the inevitable result of a poorly designed law. But the numbers suggest that the critics' sabotage efforts are to blame. After impressive declines during President Barack Obama's second term, the fund found that the uninsured rate increased in both of the years Mr. Trump has been in office. During the campaign, Mr. Trump regularly complained that the Affordable Care Act (ACA) left too many Americans uncovered. The result of nearly a year and a half of Mr. Trump's leadership is 4 million people added to that group.

Obamacare was never perfect. But Commonwealth Fund analysts noted that, rather than fixing the law's problems, Republicans have done concrete things to worsen them. "These include the administration's deep cuts in advertising and outreach during the marketplace open-enrollment periods, a shorter open enrollment period, and other actions that collectively may have left people with a general sense of confusion about the status of the law," they wrote. "Signs point to further erosion of insurance coverage in 2019: the repeal of the individual mandate penalty included in the 2017 tax law, recent actions to increase the availability of insurance policies that don't comply with ACA minimum benefit standards, and support for Medicaid work requirements."
Surely, a significant part of this sabotage is driven by Republicans' desire to dismantle the signature achievement of Barack Obama, the nation's first Black president and most recent Democratic president. But equally as significant, at least, is the fact that subverting the federal government's role in providing services to We the People (especially certain We the People) is a driving force of conservatism.

Yes, this vile cruelty is happening during the Trump administration, and the blame should be laid at his doorstep. It should be shared with the rest of his party, though. Trump, after all, is comparatively new to politics; there are Republican officeholders who have been diligently working for decades to lay the groundwork for this sort of (non)governance.

It's important to hold Trump accountable. It's also important to remember and center, always, that Trump is not an anomaly of Republican politics, but its inevitable endgame.

Open Wide...