“Pro-Life” Reimagined…

…as genuinely pro-life. Quite a concept.

Check out Nancy Goldstein’s great column on the issue. An excerpt:

What might the world look like if our elected officials and “pro-life” activists devoted the time, energy, and funding they currently spend on restricting abortion to helping women to care for their families? Or to ensuring that pregnant women live in a country where they need not worry that their children will survive infancy or go without health care, food, shelter, a good education, and a safe and healthy environment?
The reason women most often cite for getting an abortion is insufficient means to care for a child. Criminalizing abortion does absolutely nothing to solve that problem. Yet the anti-choice crowd continues their march against abortion, unconcerned with the inevitable consequence of any success they might have.

(Further related reading: See this one-two punch from LeMew on the conservative plan to incrementally dismantle Roe. It’s really good stuff; I can’t recommend it enough. And more from LeMew here.)

Shakesville is run as a safe space. First-time commenters: Please read Shakesville's Commenting Policy and Feminism 101 Section before commenting. We also do lots of in-thread moderation, so we ask that everyone read the entirety of any thread before commenting, to ensure compliance with any in-thread moderation. Thank you.

blog comments powered by Disqus